Today’s News 4th March 2020

  • The Myth Of Moderate Nuclear War
    The Myth Of Moderate Nuclear War

    Authored by Brian Cloughley via The Strategic Culture Foundation,

    There are many influential supporters of nuclear war, and some of these contend that the use of ‘low-yield’ and/or short-range weapons is practicable without the possibility of escalation to all-out Armageddon.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    In a way their argument is comparable to that of the band of starry-eyed optimists who thought, apparently seriously, that there could be such a beast as a ‘moderate rebel’.

    In October 2013 the Washington Post reported that “The CIA is expanding a clandestine effort to train opposition fighters in Syria amid concern that moderate, US-backed militias are rapidly losing ground in the country’s civil war,” and the US Congress gave approval to then President Barack Obama’s plan for training and arming moderate Syrian rebels to fight against Islamic State extremists. The belief that there could be any grouping of insurgents that could be described as “moderate rebels” is bizarre and it would be fascinating to know how Washington’s planners classify such people. It obviously didn’t dawn on them that any person who uses weapons illegally in a rebellion could not be defined as being moderate. And how moderate is moderate? Perhaps a moderate rebel could be equipped with US weapons that kill only extremists? Or are they allowed to kill only five children a month? The entire notion was absurd, and predictably the scheme collapsed, after expenditure of vast amounts of US taxpayers’ money.

    And even vaster amounts of money are being spent on developing and producing what might be classed as moderate nuclear weapons, in that they don’t have the zillion-bang punch of most of its existing 4,000 plus warheads. It is apparently widely believed in Washington that if a nuclear weapon is (comparatively) small, then it’s less dangerous than a big nuclear weapon.

    In January 2019 the Guardian reported that “the Trump administration has argued the development of a low-yield weapon would make nuclear war less likely, by giving the US a more flexible deterrent. It would counter any enemy (particularly Russian) perception that the US would balk at using its own fearsome arsenal in response to a limited nuclear attack because its missiles were all in the hundreds of kilotons range and ‘too big to use’, because they would cause untold civilian casualties.”

    In fact, the nuclear war envisaged in that scenario would be a global catastrophe — as would all nuclear wars, because there’s no way, no means whatever, of limiting escalation. Once a nuclear weapon has exploded and killed people, the nuclear-armed nation to which these people belonged is going to take massive action. There is no alternative, because no government is just going to sit there and try to start talking with an enemy that has taken the ultimate leap in warfare.

    It is widely imagined — by many nuclear planners in the sub-continent, for example — that use of a tactical, a battlefield-deployed, nuclear weapon will in some fashion persuade the opponent (India or Pakistan) that there is no need to employ higher-capability weapons, or, in other words, longer range missiles delivering massive warheads. These people think that the other side will evaluate the situation calmly and dispassionately and come to the conclusion that at most it should itself reply with a similar weapon. But such a scenario supposes that there is good intelligence about the effects of the weapon that has exploded, most probably within the opponent’s sovereign territory. This is verging on the impossible.

    War is confusing in the extreme, and tactical planning can be extremely complex. But there is no precedent for nuclear war, and nobody — nobody — knows for certain what reactions will be to such a situation in or near any nation. The US 2018 Nuclear Posture Review stated that low-yield weapons “help ensure that potential adversaries perceive no possible advantage in limited nuclear escalation, making nuclear employment less likely”. But do the possible opponents of the United States agree with that? How could they do so?

    The reaction by any nuclear-armed state to what is confirmed as a nuclear attack will have to be swift. It cannot be guaranteed, for example, that the first attack will not represent a series. It will, by definition, be decisive, because the world will then be a tiny step from doomsday. The US nuclear review is optimistic that “flexibility” will by some means limit a nuclear exchange, or even persuade the nuked-nation that there should be no riposte, which is an intriguing hypothesis.

    As pointed out by Lawfare, “the review calls for modification to ‘a small number of existing submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) warheads’ to provide a low-yield option.

    It also calls for further exploration of low-yield options, arguing that expanding these options will ‘help ensure that potential adversaries perceive no possible advantage in limited nuclear escalation, making nuclear employment less likely.’ This is intended to address the argument that adversaries might think the United States, out of concern for collateral damage, would hesitate to employ a high-yield nuclear weapon in response to a ‘lower level’ conflict, in which an adversary used a low-yield nuclear device. The review argues that expanding low-yield options is ‘important for the preservation of credible deterrence,’ especially when it comes to smaller-scale regional conflicts.”

    “Credible deterrence” is a favourite catch-phrase of the believers in limited nuclear war, but its credibility is suspect. Former US defence secretary William Perry said last year that he wasn’t so much worried about the vast number of warheads in the world as he was by open proposals that these weapons are “usable”. It’s right back to the Cold War and he emphasises that “The belief that there might be tactical advantage using nuclear weapons – which I haven’t heard being openly discussed in the United States or in Russia for a good many years – is happening now in those countries which I think is extremely distressing.” But the perturbing thing is that while it is certainly being discussed in Moscow, it’s verging on doctrine in Washington.

    In late February US Defence Secretary Esper was reported as having taken part in a “classified military drill in which Russia and the United States traded nuclear strikes.” The Pentagon stated that “The scenario included a European contingency where you’re conducting a war with Russia and Russia decides to use a low-yield, limited nuclear weapon against a site on NATO territory.” The US response was to fire back with what was called a “limited response.”

    First of all, the notion that Russia would take the first step to nuclear war is completely baseless, and there is no evidence that this could ever be contemplated. But ever if it were to be so, it cannot be imagined for an instant that Washington would indulge in moderate nuclear warfare in riposte.

    These self-justifying wargames are dangerous. And they bring Armageddon ever closer.


    Tyler Durden

    Wed, 03/04/2020 – 00:05

  • China's Rare Earth Monopoly Is Diminishing
    China’s Rare Earth Monopoly Is Diminishing

    Some while ago, rare earth metals important in the production of microchips, electronics and electric motors were almost exclusively sourced in China. However, as Statista’s Katharina Buchholz notes, in recent years, several nations have picked up production again while new players entered the market, diversifying it at least to some degree.

    Infographic: China's Rare Earth Monopoly is Diminishing | Statista

    You will find more infographics at Statista

    China was still responsible for almost two thirds of global production in 2019, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. But as many countries are wary of depending on China, especially when it comes to technology products, countries with rare earth deposits are likely to exploit them further. The U.S., however, is still shipping its rare earths to China for processing, but a first processing plant on American soil is in the planning stages with funding help from the U.S. army.

    China also has the largest know deposits of rare earths, but Brazil, Vietnam and Russia also have a lot of (largely) untapped potential in the sector. The United States and Australia ramped up production of rare earths after 2010 and most recently, Myanmar has been mining considerable amount. As seen in the chart above, the U.S. had in the past mined and produced rare earths for military uses and re-entered the market as rare earths were getting more important as a part of the implementation of crucial technologies.


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 23:45

  • What Is An SDR And Will It Be The Next World Reserve Currency?
    What Is An SDR And Will It Be The Next World Reserve Currency?

    Submitted by Jan Nieuwenhuijs for Voima Insight.

    There’s no way IMF’s Special Drawing Right, a poorly designed synthetic reserve asset, will replace the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency.

    After several years of monetary madness—artificially lowering interest rates to the extent all asset prices are distorted—the world is slowly waking up to the fact that printing money by central banks is a one-way street. Once central banks enter this trajectory (and they have), they can’t reverse. Markets have become addicted to cheap money, and central banks feel compelled to print more when the economy, or stock market, weakens. The Federal Reserve, the issuer of the U.S. dollar, is trapped too. Possibly, a paradigm shift in the international monetary system will transpire during the coming economic downturn, and the dollar will lose its status as the world reserve currency.

    Some analysts proclaim the next world reserve currency is standing ready to replace the dollar. This would be the Special Drawing Right (SDR), issued by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). According to my analysis, though, the SDR isn’t capable of being the world reserve currency. It will never be much more than a unit of account.

    If you ask a random financial expert what an SDR is, he or she is likely to say, “It’s a currency issued by the IMF, comprising a basket of the world’s most important currencies.” Based on this definition, some analyst forecast the SDR will replace the dollar. But, from examining the anatomy of the SDR, it appears it’s not a currency and there is no free market to exchange them. Which is problematic.

    Introduction

    The SDR is a “supplementary international reserve asset” that was created by the International Monetary Fund in 1969. At first, it was defined as 0.888671 grams of gold. By denominating it in a fixed weight of gold, some thought SDRs were backed by gold. Alas, SDRs were created out of thin air and then given a gold exchange rate, but they could not be redeemed for gold (page 212).

    In 1974, after the collapse of Bretton Woods, the SDR’s value was redefined based on a basket of currencies. But, again, the SDR was not backed by these currencies. Rather, the SDR’s valuation was, and is, based on the weights given to the currencies in the basket.

    On the IMF website, we can read an illuminating definition of the SDR:

    The SDR is neither a currency nor a claim on the IMF. Rather, it is a potential claim on the freely usable currencies of IMF members.

    The SDR is not a currency, because it can’t be used by individuals; it’s not a medium of exchange. The word “potential” in the definition of the SDR is crucial. It reveals that any monetary authority holding SDRs, might be able to convert them into “freely usable currencies of IMF members”, or it might not. How come? In the IMF Financial Operations 2018 we can read:

    there is no market for the SDR itself in which excess supply or demand pressure can be eliminated by adjustments in the price, or value, of the SDR.

    The SDR is a “potential claim” on freely usable currencies, because there is no market for the SDR, and it’s not a liability of the IMF. The result is that possibly SDRs can be exchanged for actual currencies (below is explained how), but there is no guarantee.

    How the SDR can function as the backbone of the international monetary system (IMS) if there is not a (highly liquid) market for it? The answer is, it can’t.

    From this short introduction, we see that the SDR is essentially a unit of account. In the remainder of this article, we will delve into the anatomy of the SDR, how it’s traded and the likelihood of replacing the U.S. dollar.

    What Is an SDR?

    The SDR is a supplementary international reserve asset. SDRs can’t be held by private entities or individuals, but only by IMF member countries, and, currently, fifteen organizations approved by the IMF as “prescribed holders” (page 91). Let’s start with a brief introduction of the IMF’s governing structure, as a backdrop to understand how SDRs are created and used. We’ll start with the IMF’s General Department.

    Courtesy IMF Financial Operations 2018.

    The IMF’s resources are mainly held in its General Resources Account, which is managed by the General Department. Each IMF member country is required to transfer financial resources to the IMF based on its “quota”, set according to a member’s relative economic position in the world economy. The General Resources Account is a pool of currencies and reserve assets, mostly built from members’ paid capital subscriptions derived from quotas (page 13).

    Courtesy IMF Financial Operations 2018.

    For lending operations (for which the Fund is mostly known for), the IMF does offer SDRs as an alternative to “usable currencies” from its General Resources Account, but in practice, the majority of loans and repayments are made in usable currencies (page 92). (“Freely usable currencies”, according to the IMF are currencies “widely used to make payments for international transactions, and [are] widely traded in the principal exchange markets.”)

    Quotas are also tied to an IMF member’s voting power, and they determine the share of SDR allocations. When SDR’s are created by the IMF, out of thin air, they are allocated among all 189 IMF members according to the quotas. The IMF can’t allocate SDRs to itself or to prescribed holders (page 89).

     

    Once newly created SDRs are collected, two entries arise on an IMF member’s balance sheet: “SDR holdings” on the asset side, and “SDR allocations” on the liability side.

    Courtesy Users’ Guide To The SDR: A Manual of Transactions and Operations in SDRs.

    Members receive the SDR interest rate on SDR holdings and pay the SDR interest rate on SDR allocations. SDR interest rate transfer system is a zero-sum game. Those having less SDR holdings than allocations pay interest to those with more SDR holdings than allocations. The IMF’s SDR Department, the center of the SDR apparatus, manages all interest rate flows.

    So when, say, Norway exchanges SDR holdings for currency via the IMF’s SDR Department, Norway’s SDR holdings will be lower relative to its SDR allocations. Therefore, Norway will pay interest. Norway’s transaction will cause others, in the SDR universe, to have more SDR holdings than allocations who then will receive the interest paid by Norway.

    The SDR department receives interest on all outstanding SDR holdings and charges interest on all SDR allocations.

    How Is the SDR Value and SDR Interest Rate Determined?

    The exchange rate of the SDR, set daily, is based on the weights of the currencies comprising the SDR basket. Today, the basket contains five currencies: the U.S. dollar, Chinese renminbi, the Japanese yen, the euro, and the Great British Pound. In the second column in the table below, you can see what weight, in percentage, is assigned to each currency (“Currency weight”).

    The SDR is revised every five years. The most recent revision of the SDR basket was in 2015, when the Chinese renminbi was added. After the revision, on October 1, 2016, the new currency weights were set, and the exchange rates between the currencies that day prompted a “Currency amount” for each of them (page 100). The latter is displayed in the third column in the table above and can be seen as a multiplying factor for the SDR’s daily valuation.

    Because the exchange rates between the currencies in the SDR basket continuously fluctuate, prevailing rates are used for the SDR’s daily valuation as well. In the fourth column, you can see the prevailing “Exchange rate,” which is multiplied by the currency amount to arrive at a “U.S. dollar equivalent” (in the fifth column). All the U.S. dollar equivalents added up instigate the price of the SDR denominated in U.S. dollars. On February 14, 2020, the value of the SDR was expressed as $1.36751. With the U.S. dollar exchange rate, the SDR’s exchange rate with other currencies can be computed.

    So, the SDR is neither a claim on these currencies nor do they fully or fractionally back the SDR. Instead, the currency weights, currency amounts, and exchange rates produce a daily SDR value, which is used when SDRs are exchanged for currency.

    The SDR interest rate is set weekly and is based on the 3-months interest rate benchmarks of the five currencies and their respective weights in the SDR basket (page 89). The interest rate benchmarks are:

    —US dollar: three-month US Treasury bills

    —Euro: three-month rate for euro area central government bonds with a rating of AA and above published by the European Central Bank

    —Chinese renminbi: three-month benchmark yield for China Treasury bonds as published by the China Central Depository and Clearing Co. Ltd.

    —Japanese yen: three-month Japanese Treasury discount bills

    —Pound sterling: three-month UK Treasury bills.

    Remarkably, the floor for the SDR interest rate is 0.05%.

    How Are SDRs Traded?

    Because “there is no market for the SDR itself in which excess supply or demand pressure can be eliminated by adjustments in the price”, SDRs are primarily traded via Voluntary Trading Arrangements (VTAs). Meaning, supply and demand are connected through a managed market at the SDR Department. In the IMF Financial Operations 2018, we read:

    The role of the IMF [SDR Department] in transactions by agreement [VTAs] is to act as an intermediary, matching participants in this managed market in a manner that meets, to the greatest extent possible, the requirements and preferences of buyers and sellers of SDRs.

    In other words, a country wishing to sell SDRs for usable currency will notify the SDR Department to match the seller with a buyer. Trades are settled through the SDR Department. It’s not prohibited for countries to exchange SDRs for currency, but, again, there’s no market. The SDR is used almost exclusively in transactions with the IMF; for operations between IMF members and the General Resources Account (page 86).

    Next to VTAs through the SDR Department, there’s one more way for the IMF to make its members exchange SDRs: the designation mechanism. From the IMF Financial Operations 2018:

    In the event there is insufficient capacity under the voluntary trading arrangements [VTAs], the IMF can activate the designation mechanism: IMF members with a strong balance of payments and reserves position may be designated by the IMF to purchase SDRs from members with weak external positions.

    In case of emergency, the IMF will designate a member, with a strong balance of payments, to exchange currency for SDRs (page 105). Although, I doubt the designation mechanism has ever been activated, or ever will (page 86 and 93). The IMF states, “the functioning of the SDR Department … is based on the principle of mutuality and intergovernmental cooperation.” As far as I know, there is no judicial framework that can make the IMF command sovereign nations how to disperse their international reserves. In case the proverbial “shit hits the fan”, I’m doubtful members will buy SDRs according to the whims of the IMF.

    With respect to IMF loans, things are different. These are based on conditionality, in which case the Fund can exercise significant power over borrowing nations.

    Other Deficiencies

    According to my analysis, the SDR will never be the main international reserve asset. Not in its current form, nor in any future form. One of its deficiencies that I haven’t addressed extensively is that the essence of the SDR has changed regularly since 1969. First, it was a book entry defined in gold weight. In 1974 its value was redefined as a basket of sixteen currencies. And the SDR interest rate “set semiannually at about half the level of a combined market interest rate that was defined as a weighted average of interest rates on short-term market instruments in France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States [page 87].” In 1981 the basket was altered to five currencies, and the SDR interest rate was made equal to market rates. In 2000, the basket was brought down to four currencies, and new selection criteria were adopted. In 2015, the last significant change was made when they added the Chinese renminbi. But who knows what an SDR will be in the future?

    Now, why would any monetary authority hold most of its resources in an asset which essence can be modified (and its units created boundlessly)? And then to think there is no actual market for them to be exchanged, and Voluntary Trading Arrangements and the designation mechanism presage anything but liquidity.

    What Have SDR Scholars Written?

    Another core deficiency of the SDR was addressed by Eswar S. Prasad, former Chief of the Financial Studies Division at the IMF’s Research Department, in The Dollar Trap (page 280):

    In principle, SDRs can be exchanged for “freely usable” currencies but cannot be used directly in private transactions. Thus, increasing the stock of SDRs does not increase the total liquidity of the global monetary system.

    Because SDRs are not backed by anything and are not a medium of exchange, creating SDRs doesn’t create more “total liquidity of the global monetary system.”

    Now, what is the true value of these SDRs as they’re not backed by currency and there is no market to exchange them? The reality is that the SDR’s true value “derives from the commitments of members to exchange SDRs for freely usable currencies [page 86].” Consequently, when members aren’t committed to exchange SDRs, its true value drops to zero. Surely, a fictional exchange rate will continue to be published—to serve as a unit of account—but its true exchange rate would be zero.

    The economist Fred Hirsch, senior adviser to the IMF (1966-1972), published an essay in 1974 titled “An SDR Standard: Impetus, Elements, and Impediments.” Hirsch wrote that it was “generally recognized in both academic and official circles, [that] SDRs in their present form are inadequate … [as] a secure and controlled base for world monetary reserves.” To continue, “a more comprehensive SDR system would represent a substantial step toward a world central bank.”

    I agree. Maybe the SDR can succeed if its essence is changed once again, the world would fully financially integrate, and all countries would be subordinate to one world central bank that could control all of its members’ monetary policy. But that’s not going to happen. First, it makes no sense. Second, the current trend is financial disintegration. Look at Brexit and the trade war between China and the U.S. Are we really to believe that the world will submit under a new global central bank that will issue the “SDR 11.3.4”? And all nations will surrender their monetary sovereignty? I don’t think so.

    Additionally, central banks are buying gold or repatriating gold. The motivation to buy gold is to diversify away from what can be printed boundlessly. Repatriating gold was called “economic nationalism” by the Executive Director of the Austrian central bank in 2015, Peter Mooslechner. Which is a fitting description for the present trend.

    Hirsch also stated integration wasn’t feasible, nor, in his view, desirable:

    At present [1974], however, the integrationist objective is not generally regarded as feasible on a global basis (and some, including myself, would not regard it as desirable).

    Why China Is Promoting SDRs

    Some of you might think, “so what was all the fuss about when the renminbi was added to the SDR? Financial blogs were speaking of a new paradigm! What about the Governor of the People’s Bank of China (PBoC), Zhou Xiaochuan’s paper from March 23, 2009—Reform the international monetary system—in which the SDR was discussed?”

    Yes, Zhou wrote the IMS should be less centered around the U.S. dollar, and more towards, as an example, the SDR. From Zhou about the SDR:

    A super-sovereign reserve currency managed by a global institution could be used to both create and control the global liquidity.

    Special consideration should be given to giving the SDR a greater role.

    This will require political cooperation among member countries.

    Zhou’s remarks boil down to an SDR overhaul and a world central bank, as mentioned by Hirsch. Not feasible.

    In my view, Zhou mentioned the SDR as a decoy. There are two reasons why the Chinese like to talk about SDRs.

    One, the SDR is about symbolism. China’s goals are to internationalize the renminbi as a trade currency, and have it globally accepted as a reserve currency. In the end, to leverage the Chinese economy, equal to the extent economies of international currency issuers such as the U.S. and the eurozone have advantaged. Adoption into the SDR gave the renminbi a seal of approval as world reserve currency. This is one reason why China is cheering about the SDR.

    Two, the Chinese want to diminish the role of the U.S. dollar in every way possible. Hence, China currently publishes its international reserves denominated in U.S. dollars and SDRs. For the Chinese, the more attention is diverted from U.S. units of account, the better.

    China’s international reserves in 2019, denominated in U.S. dollars and SDRs.

    In 2016, the weight of the Chinese golden Panda coin changed from 1 troy ounce to 30 grams. Effectively, the coin’s weight went from 31.103 grams to 30 grams. This change was symbolic as well as strategic: to use as few U.S. units of account as possible. Similar to denominate value as much as possible, “not in U.S. dollars.” The Panda weight adjustment also streamlined it to be traded on the Shanghai Gold Exchange, where the gold price is quoted in yuan per fine gram (not troy ounce).

    Next to symbolism, China also develops concrete methods to gain international market share at U.S.’s expense. By, for example, launching international commodity trading in renminbi such as the Shanghai Gold benchmark and Shanghai Oil.

    Consider that since Zhou’s paper was published, in March 23, 2009, the PBoC added 520 million SDRs to its international reserves and 1,348 tonnes of gold. Measured in their own units of account (irrespective of the change in the gold price), China’s SDR reserves went up by 95%, and its gold reserves by 225%.

    But because a unit of gold is more expensive, and its price has gone up since 2009, the amount of gold added by the PBoC since then is worth 50 billion SDRs at today’s prices, which is 9,491% more than the 50 million in SDR reserves increment.

    Did Zhou mean to shift the IMS towards the SDR? Did he saw value in the SDR? If so, why didn’t he put his money where his mouth is?

    Or, was Zhou’s message simply to ditch the dollar, but he preferred not to speak about gold, as this would put steroids on the gold price? An escalating gold price would make the PBoC able to buy less gold in the process of diversifying its foreign exchange reserves. I think this is why Zhou mentioned SDRs.

    It’s always best to look at what central bankers do, not what they say. Across the globe many central banks have been shifting towards gold since 2009, not SDRs.

    Conclusion

    From all the deficiencies concerning the SDR—it’s not a currency, there is no market, no liquidity, it’s essence can be changed, etc.—I think the SDR will continue to play a marginal role in international economics. At most its use as a unit of account will be expanded.

    In the near future I expect gold’s role in the IMS to increase. When economic growth declines, countries will (likely) devalue their currencies, and when “economic nationalism” increases, reserve asset managers will prefer to hold the only universally accepted financial assets that doesn’t have counterparty risk and can’t be printed: gold.

    Stay up to date, subscribe to Voima Insight—click here

    The views expressed on Voima Insight are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official views or position of Voima Gold.

    You are allowed to copy our content, in whole or in part, provided that you give Voima Gold proper credit and include the appropriate URL. The name Voima Insight and a link to the original post must be included in your introduction. All other rights are reserved. Voima Gold reserves the right to withdraw the permission to copy content for any or all websites at any time.


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 23:25

  • Bernie-Supporting Denver Councilwoman Encourages Coronavirus Patients To Attend MAGA Rallies
    Bernie-Supporting Denver Councilwoman Encourages Coronavirus Patients To Attend MAGA Rallies

    A Denver councilwoman has come under fire for praising a now-deleted tweet from a user who said they would attend “every MAGA rally I can” if they are infected with the new coronavirus.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Candi CdeBaca (D) tweeted “#solidarity Yaaaas!!” in support of the message:

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    And surprise, she’s a supporter of Bernie Sanders – whose staffers were caught on hidden camera espousing the virtues of throwing rich people in literal gulags while they redistribute their wealth.

    In response to the tweet, CdeBaca’s office said: “Councilwoman CdeBaca made a sarcastic tweet on Twitter to call attention to the Trump administration’s downplaying of the Coronavirus outbreak as a “hoax” no more dangerous than the common flu. Rather than conservative outlets making a four-day-old Tweet their focus on Super Tuesday, they should focus their energy on demanding a competent Federal response to this public health crisis instead.”

    The Colorado Republican Party, meanwhile, said in response: “Councilwoman CdeBaca praising a social media post calling for Trump supporters to be infected with the coronavirus is simply disgusting. There can be no room in our politics for wishing harm on Americans who have different political beliefs. Democrats in Colorado and across the country need to condemn this evil statement,”  “In light of these comments, the Colorado Republican Party is calling on Councilwoman CdeBaca to resign immediately.”

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 23:05

  • The Syria Deception
    The Syria Deception

    Submitted by the Swiss Propaganda Research organization

    Understanding the geopolitical and psychological war against Syria.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    What is the Syria war about?

    Contrary to the depiction in Western media, the Syria war is not a civil war. This is because the initiators, financiers and a large part of the anti-government fighters come from abroad.

    Nor is the Syria war a religious war, for Syria was and still is one of the most secular countries in the region, and the Syrian army – like its direct opponents – is itself mainly composed of Sunnis.

    But the Syria war is also not a pipeline war, as some critics suspected, because the allegedly competing gas pipeline projects never existed to begin with, as even the Syrian president confirmed.

    Instead, the Syria war is a war of conquest and regime change, which developed into a geopolitical proxy war between NATO states on one side – especially the US, Great Britain and France – and Russia, Iran and China on the other side.

    In fact, already since the 1940s the US has repeatedly attempted to install a pro-Western government in Syria, such as in 1949, 1956, 1957, after 1980 and after 2003, but without success so far. This makes Syria – since the fall of Libya – the last Mediterranean country independent of NATO.

    Thus, in the course of the “Arab Spring” of 2011, NATO and its allies, especially Israel and the Gulf States, decided to try again. To this end, politically and economically motivated protests in Syria were used and were quickly escalated into an armed conflict.

    NATO’s original strategy of 2011 was based on the Afghanistan war of the 1980s and aimed at conquering Syria mainly through positively portrayed Islamist militias (so-called “rebels”). This did not succeed, however, because the militias lacked an air force and anti-aircraft missiles.

    Hence from 2013 onwards, various poison gas attacks were staged in order to be able to deploy the NATO air force as part of a “humanitarian intervention” similar to the earlier wars against Libya and Yugoslavia. But this did not succeed either, mainly because Russia and China blocked a UN mandate.

    As of 2014, therefore, additional but negatively portrayed Islamist militias (“terrorists”) were covertly established in Syria and Iraq via NATO partners Turkey and Jordan, secretly supplied with weapons and vehicles and indirectly financed by oil exports via the Turkish Ceyhan terminal.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    ISIS: Supply and export routes through NATO partners Turkey and Jordan (ISW / Atlantic, 2015)

    Media-effective atrocity propaganda and mysterious “terrorist attacks” in Europe and the US then offered the opportunity to intervene in Syria using the NATO air force even without a UN mandate – ostensibly to fight the “terrorists”, but in reality still to conquer Syria and topple its government.

    This plan failed again, however, as Russia also used the presence of the “terrorists” in autumn 2015 as a justification for direct military intervention and was now able to attack both the “terrorists” and parts of NATO’s “rebels” while simultaneously securing the Syrian airspace to a large extent.

    By the end of 2016, the Syrian army thus succeeded in recapturing the city of Aleppo.

    From 2016 onwards, NATO therefore switched back to positively portrayed but now Kurdish-led militias  (the SDF) in order to still have unassailable ground forces available and to conquer the Syrian territory held by the previously established “terrorists” before Syria and Russia could do so themselves.

    This led to a kind of “race” to conquer cities such as Raqqa and Deir ez-Zor in 2017 and to a temporary division of Syria along the Euphrates river into a (largely) Syrian-controlled West and a Kurdish (or rather American) controlled East (see map above).

    This move, however, brought NATO into conflict with its key member Turkey, because Turkey did not accept a Kurdish-controlled territory on its southern border. As a result, the NATO alliance became increasingly divided from 2018 onwards.

    Turkey now fought the Kurds in northern Syria and at the same time supported the remaining Islamists in the north-western province of Idlib against the Syrian army, while the Americans eventually withdrew to the eastern Syrian oil fields in order to retain a political bargaining chip.

    While Turkey supported Islamists in northern Syria, Israel more or less covertly supplied Islamists in southern Syria and at the same time fought Iranian and Lebanese (Hezbollah) units with air strikes, but ultimately without success: the militias in southern Syria had to surrender in 2018.

    Ultimately, some NATO members tried to use a confrontation between the Turkish and Syrian armies in the province of Idlib as a last option to escalate the war. In addition to the situation in Idlib, the issues of the occupied territories in the north and east of Syria remain to be resolved, too.

    Russia, for its part, has tried to draw Turkey out of the NATO alliance and onto its own side as far as possible. Modern Turkey, however, is pursuing a rather far-reaching geopolitical strategy of its own, which is also increasingly clashing with Russian interests in the Middle East and Central Asia.

    As part of this geopolitical strategy, Turkey in 2015 and 2020 even used the so-called »weapon of mass migration«, which may serve to destabilize both Syria (so-called strategic depopulation) and Europe, as well as to extort financial, political or military support from the European Union.

    What role did the Western media play in this war?

    The task of NATO-compliant media was to portray the war against Syria as a “civil war, the Islamist “rebels” positively, the Islamist “terrorists” and the Syrian government negatively, the alleged “poison gas attacks” credibly and the NATO intervention consequently as legitimate.

    An important tool for this media strategy were the numerous Western-sponsored “media centres”, “activist groups”, “Twitter girls”, “human rights observatories” and the like, which provided Western news agencies and media with the desired images and information.

    Since 2019, NATO-compliant media moreover had to conceal or discredit various leaks and whistleblowers that began to prove the covert Western arms deliveries to the Islamist “rebels” and “terrorists” as well as the staged “poison gas attacks”.

    But if even the “terrorists” in Syria were demonstrably established and equipped by NATO states, what role then did the mysterious “caliph of terror” Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi play? He possibly played a similar role as his direct predecessor, Omar al-Baghdadi – who was a phantom.

    Thanks to new communication technologies and on-site sources, the Syria war was also the first war about which independent media could report almost in real-time and thus for the first time significantly influenced the public perception of events – a potentially historic change.


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 22:45

  • Tesla Downgrades Hardware On "New" Model 3s In China, Then Delivers Them Anyway To Unsuspecting Customers
    Tesla Downgrades Hardware On “New” Model 3s In China, Then Delivers Them Anyway To Unsuspecting Customers

    It looks like Tesla may have finally found a way to use up all of that old, unused inventory that’s been sitting on the company’s balance sheet: make new cars with old parts, and blame the coronavirus.

    At least, that’s exactly what it appears the company is doing in China, according to a recent report by Xinhua

    On Tuesday, the news broke that Tesla was “downgrading” hardware on its China made Model 3 due to “supply chain status amid the epidemic” and it then promised free upgrades to its customers. Instead of just doing the right thing, which would be suspending production until you can make the product property, Tesla is doing what it does best: half assing it. 

    The report points out that some Chinese consumers were noticing that the hardware in their newly delivered Tesla vehicles was inconsistent with their orders. Tesla responded by saying that Hardware 2.5 had been installed in some vehicles that were promised Hardware 3.0.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Isn’t that a nice way to find out, as a consumer, that you’re not getting what you ordered?

    Elsewhere, this would look suspiciously like a bait and switch. And it appears from Xinhua’s report that Tesla only fessed up after consumers started to take notice. We’d also be extremely interested in finding out when and how Tesla delivers on the promise of “free upgrades” for the customers taking delivery of their vehicles, with the wrong hardware, now.

    The company’s Gigafactory in China resumed work on Feburary 10. 

    People on social media were skeptical – to say the least. But it seems as long as Tesla’s stock holds up, Elon Musk will continue to get away with things like this. It’s when the tide goes out on the stock that we’re most interested in finding out what bubbles to the surface:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 22:25

  • Physicist Says Parallel Universes Definitely Exist And We May Soon Explore Them
    Physicist Says Parallel Universes Definitely Exist And We May Soon Explore Them

    Authored by Aaron Kesel via TheMindUnleashed.com,

    Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll expressed that clues in the small-scale structure of the universe point to the existence of numerous parallel worlds.

    The shocking comments were made on the Jeff Rogan Experience (JRE) podcast last year. Carroll says that the fact that tiny particles like electrons and photons don’t have one set location in the universe is evidence that there are many parallel universes.

    Recently, in a follow up interview with News.com.au, Carroll expanded his thoughts.

    But there’s a lot more going on,” Carroll told News.com.au.Not every world you imagine actually comes true.”

    The common sense rules of physics that rule our lives everyday make sense to us but at very minuscule scales common sense breaks down altogether. At the quantum level, the empty vacuum of space is filled with tiny particles constantly popping in and out of existence.

    Bell’s theorem, a fundamental construct in quantum mechanics, may prove that multiverses exist.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    This theorem deals with situations where particles interact with each other, become entangled, and then go their separate ways, according to New Scientist.

    There are still equations, physical rules, patterns that must be obeyed. Some possible alternate worlds can come true. But not all of them,” Carroll said.

    In the past, Carroll has advanced some groundbreaking yet controversial theories on topics such as the Big Bang theory and the nature of time.

    He has said that the universe didn’t start in a huge explosion as most people now believe, but instead it is an infinitely old, constantly inflating entity in which time can run both forward and backward.

    For Carroll quantum physics is not something that can be broken down and explained in simpler terms.

    As far as we currently know,” he writes.

    “Quantum mechanics isn’t just an approximation to the truth; it is the truth.”

    Physics is stuck trying to understand the fundamentals of nature and the Big Bang,” Carroll said.

    It’s time to take a step back and understand its foundations. It’s time to tackle our understanding of the quantum world.”

    In 2011 physicist Brian Greene wrote a book exploring the possibility called The Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos.

    “You almost can’t avoid having some version of the multiverse in your studies if you push deeply enough in the mathematical descriptions of the physical universe,” Greene told NPR.

     “There are many of us thinking of one version of parallel universe theory or another. If it’s all a lot of nonsense, then it’s a lot of wasted effort going into this far-out idea. But if this idea is correct, it is a fantastic upheaval in our understanding.”

    Even Stephen Hawking suggested that, thanks to quantum mechanics, the Big Bang supplied us with an endless number of universes, not just one.

    Up until this point understanding quantum physics and its realms has been impossible, but Carroll hopes that is changing thanks to technology.

    Now we’re getting better at that,” Carroll says.Technology has improved. Maybe things are going to change.”

    Greene, Carroll, and Hawking may be right, and researchers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee want to find out if there are multiverses or mirror images of our own reality. The team was set to record experiments last year sending a beam of subatomic particles down a 50-foot tunnel, past a powerful magnet and into an impenetrable wall.

    If it exists, it would form a bubble of reality nestling within the fabric of space and time alongside our own familiar universe, with some particles capable of switching between the two,” lead researcher Leah Broussard told New Scientist.


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 22:05

  • "No Child Should Feel Stigmatized": California Bill Would Punish Retailers With Separate Boys And Girls Departments
    “No Child Should Feel Stigmatized”: California Bill Would Punish Retailers With Separate Boys And Girls Departments

    A bill introduced by a California Democratic lawmaker would punish stores that separate toys, clothing and other children’s items into separate boys and girls sections – forcing them to pay a $1000 fine, according to The Federalist Papers.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    I was inspired to introduce this bill after 8-year-old Britten asked, ‘Why should a store tell me what a girl’s shirt or toy is?” said California State Assembly member Evan Low of Silicon Valley, who unveiled AB 2826 last week. “Her bill will help children express themselves freely and without bias. We need to let kids be kids.”

    Via a press release by Low:

    Clothing and toys sections of department stores that are separated along gender lines pigeonhole children. No child should feel stigmatized for wearing a dinosaur shirt or playing with a Barbie doll, and separating items that are traditionally marketed for either girls or boys makes it more difficult for the consumer to compare products. It also incorrectly implies that their use by one gender is inappropriate.

    The bill states:

    This bill would require a retail department store with 500 or more employees to maintain undivided areas of its sales floor where, if it sells childcare articles, children’s clothing, or toys, all childcare items, all clothing for children, or all toys, regardless of whether a particular item has traditionally been marketed for either girls or for boys, shall be displayed. Beginning on January 1, 2023, the bill would make a retail department store that fails to correct a violation of these provisions within 30 days of receiving written notice of the violation from the Attorney General liable for a civil penalty of $1,000, as provided.

    (a) A retail department store shall maintain one, undivided area of its sales floor where, if it sells childcare articles, all childcare articles, regardless of whether a particular item has traditionally been marketed for either girls or for boys, shall be displayed.

    (b) A retail department store shall maintain one, undivided area of its sales floor where, if it sells children’s clothing, all clothing for children, regardless of whether a particular item has traditionally been marketed for either girls or for boys, shall be displayed.

    (c) A retail department store shall maintain one, undivided area of its sales floor where, if it sells toys, all toys, regardless of whether a particular item has traditionally been marketed for either girls or for boys, shall be displayed.

    Yet another ‘quirk’ for California retailers to love about the Golden State.


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 21:45

  • How James Madison Lay The Ground For American Paranoia
    How James Madison Lay The Ground For American Paranoia

    Authored by Daniel Lazare via The Strategic Culture Foundation,

    People have always wondered what makes America so paranoid. The historian Richard Hofstadter wrote about it in 1964 in a famous Harper’s essay, “The Paranoid Style in American Politics,” that he later expanded into a book. He took aim at all the usual suspects: Joe McCarthy going on about “a great conspiracy on a scale so immense,” turn-of-the-century Populists warning of international bankers seeking to crucify Americans on a cross of gold, antebellum Know-Nothings raving about Catholics and the Pope, and so on.

    But one aspect Hofstadter didn’t address is why.

    Why is it that Americans are so quick to blame their problems on others instead of themselves? Rather than analyzing their society in a calm and sensible way, why do they continually go in search of mysterious foreign cabals?

    The question has never been more relevant than in an age of Russia, Russia, Russia. If Joe Biden is sagging at the polls, if Bernie Sanders is surging, or if Donald Trump is seemingly headed for a second term, then it can only mean one thing: the Kremlin is at it again. As the New York Times declared in all seriousness in explaining why Sanders and Trump are benefiting at Biden’s expense, it’s because they “represent the most divergent ends of their respective parties, and both are backed by supporters known more for their passion than their policy rigor, which makes them ripe for exploitation by Russian trolls, disinformation specialists, and hackers for hire seeking to widen divisions in American society.”

    Since Russia finds it easier to manipulate Americans when they gravitate to the extremes, that’s where it somehow causes them to wind up.

    Or so corporate media assure us. But where does such paranoid nonsense come from and why does the press bombard us with it night and day?

    Although Hofstadter traced the problem back to the mid-nineteenth century, we can trace it back even farther – all the way, in fact, to the nation’s founding. Indeed, we might argue, with only slight exaggeration, that it began with a single individual: James Madison.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Madison, of course, is the wealthy Virginia slaveowner who played a leading role in the Constitutional Convention in 1787 and was an equally important figure in the great ratification debate that followed immediately after. He wrote 29 of the 85 newspaper articles known as the Federalist Papers, which expounded the new plan of government to his fellow countrymen.

    And he authored the all-important Federalist No. 10, the essay that political scientists never tire of quoting, which argues that democracy must be endlessly checked and balanced against itself in order to prevent Americans from coming together in “a rage for paper money, for an abolition of debts, for an equal division of property, or for any other improper or wicked project.”

    A Bernie supporter he was not. But Madison was even pithier in an October 1787 letter to Thomas Jefferson in which he summed up the meaning of checks and balances and separation of powers in a single sentence.

    Divide et impera,” he wrote, “the reprobated axiom of tyranny, is under certain qualifications, the only policy, by which a republic can be administered on just principles.

    These twenty-five words tell you everything you need to know about American politics, including why they’re now in such trouble. Divide et impera, Latin for “divide and conquer,” is Madison’s ironic justification for dividing government up into separate executive, legislative, and judicial functions and then pitting them against one another so as to neutralize democracy’s most dangerous tendencies.

    The idea is to structure the polity in such a way that it ends up more rational and moderate than any of its components. But divide et impera leads to a paradox. If, as the Preamble to the Constitution states, “we the people” are the prime movers in the new republic, able to “ordain and establish” new constitutions and destroy old ones in the bargain like the 1783 Articles of Confederation, then what happens once they undergo the self-division and conquest that Madison describes? Are they still “we the people”? Or are they now an agglomeration of splintered sub-groups without any sense of collective democratic identity or will?

    Anyone who studies American fragmentation will suspect it’s the latter. But that leads to another question. Psychologists tell us that a healthy, well-balanced adult is one whose intellect, emotions, and drives come together to form a balanced and integrated whole. Since the individual is in charge of all his faculties, he’s able to marshal his resources so as to solve problems, work creatively, and process information clearly, logically, and accurately.

    But if those same faculties are fragmented and mutually at odds, the opposite occurs. Instead of marshalling his resource, the individual is paralyzed and confused. Instead of seeing the world as it is, he shies at phantoms of his own making. As a Bosnian psychologist named Vito Zepinic explained a few years ago, “the vulnerable self-structure of traumatized individuals” leads to “difficulties in self-regulation (self-esteem maintenance, lower tolerance levels, and the sense of self-discontinuity)” and “frequent upsurges of anxiety/fear, depression, and specific fears or phobias regarding the external world…”

    What holds for individual patients also holds for a collective personality like the United States. Since 2000, it has suffered repeated traumas in the form of war, terrorism, military defeat, financial crisis, and stolen elections, the effect of which has been to take Madisonian self-disintegration and render it even more debilitating. “Difficulties in self-regulation” are what happens after decades of corruption and gridlock. Problems with “self-esteem maintenance” lead to an obsession with making America great again. “Lower tolerance levels” give rise to fears of alien hordes overrunning the border. “Phobias regarding the external world” are another term for mass paranoia about Russian agents lurking behind every bush and beneath every bed.

    The upshot is a country that is lost, disoriented, and unable to tell where reality begins and fantasy leaves off. When the Washington Post recently reported that Russia is working behind the scenes to boost the Sanders campaign, a sensible person would have demanded to see the evidence. But not Bernie. To the contrary, he snapped to attention even though there was no evidence to be had and denounced Putin as an “autocratic thug” who should “stay out of American elections.”

    Similarly, when CBS News asked Biden why he was doing so poorly, he replied that it’s because “the Russians don’t want me to be the nominee … they like Bernie.” When a reporter asked Pete Buttigieg what the Russias were looking to accomplish in the 2020 election, he explained with equal confidence: they “want chaos.”

    They can’t process information concerning what Russia is really up to and therefore make up horror stories to scare themselves in the dark. Instead of exposing a petty imperialist like Jeff Bezos, the Washington Post’s owner, they allow themselves to be manipulated.

    The upshot is a democracy that is too weak and fragmented to govern itself effectively. The big question is how to overcome Madisonian self-division so as to render democracy coherent and whole. But that’s a subject for another essay.


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 21:25

  • "Ground Zero For Trade" – Port Of Long Beach Warns Of Shipping Slump From China
    “Ground Zero For Trade” – Port Of Long Beach Warns Of Shipping Slump From China

    Investors are grossly underestimating the potential economic impact of Covid-19 as the first signs of China’s supply chain meltdown are now washing ashore on US West Coast ports. 

    The Port of Long Beach, the second-largest containerized port in the US, has had two top officials warn in the last several weeks of chilling effects of supply chain disruptions from China. 

    Last week, the Deputy Executive Director of Administration and Operations for the Port of Long Beach Noel Hacegaba warned China’s economic paralysis led to the increase of blank sails between China and the US. He said port activity plunged in January and February, with expected weakness to continue through March.  

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Hacegaba said the slowdown at Long Beach is starting to hit the local economy around the port. He said it could only be a matter of time before it triggers a broader slowdown in the region, and even maybe in the overall US economy. 

    As we’ve noted in many pieces of creaking global supply chains fast emerging in China and spreading outwards, Deutsche Bank’s senior European economist Clemente Delucia last month pointed out in a report titled “The impact of the coronavirus: A supply-chain analysis” that the US is overly exposed to a crashing China economy.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    As for the second Long Beach official, Bloomberg quoted Mario Cordero, executive director of the port, who said cargo volumes are expected to slump 9% YoY in February due to declining shipments from China.

    Cordero said February’s YoY loss is nearly double of 2019’s decline of 5.4%, which has already resulted in a 50% reduction in labor at the port. He said the East Asia shipping route accounts for 90% of shipments through the port. 

    “The port of Long Beach is ground zero for trade,” warns Cordero. “There was uncertainty with the trade war, but the coronavirus has taken it to chaotic.”

    Downward pressure from supply chain disruptions in China has now spilled over into the rest of the world. The transmission mechanism to the US is West Coast ports. The port Long Beach handles $200 billion in trade annually and supports 2.6 million trade-related jobs across the country, including almost 600,000 in Southern California.

    As for other West Coast ports, reports of a containerized volume declines from China are inevitable. These ports are a critical artery of the US economy’s transportation infrastructure and essential for the flow of imports and exports, representing about 12.5% of US GDP. 

    A slowdown of containerized volume at Long Beach and other West Coast ports could suggest a broader economic downturn is ahead for the US economy. 


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 21:05

  • China Composite PMI Crashes To Record Lows As Services Economy Implodes
    China Composite PMI Crashes To Record Lows As Services Economy Implodes

    Stagnating consumption amid the coronavirus epidemic has had a great impact on China’s service sector in February, as one would expect.

    February PMI data signalled the first reduction in business activity across China’s service sector on record due to restrictions implemented to contain the recent coronavirus outbreak. Firms across all sectors reported on the damaging effect that the virus was having on the economy via company closures and travel restrictions, with total new orders also falling at a record pace. Restrictions around travel also impacted firms’ ability to source workers, leading a renewed fall in staff numbers. Consequently, backlogs of work rose at a substantial pace.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Commenting on the China General Services and Composite PMI data, Dr. Zhengsheng Zhong, Chairman and Chief Economist at CEBM Group said:

    “The Caixin China General Services Business Activity Index fell to 26.5 in February, about half the reading of the previous month, marking its first drop into contractionary territory since the survey launched in November 2005. Stagnating consumption amid the coronavirus epidemic has had a great impact on the service sector.

    1) Demand for services shrank sharply. Both the gauges for total new business and new export business dropped to their lowest levels on record.

    2) It was difficult for service providers to recruit workers, and backlogs of work climbed. The drop in the employment gauge was relatively small, but its February reading marked the lowest point on record. The measure for outstanding orders surged to a record high. Supply capacity across the service sector was insufficient amid restrictions on the movement of people.

    3) The measure for input costs dropped at a steeper rate than that for prices companies charged customers, because of a sharp decline in supply capacity.

    4) Business confidence also fell to a record low. Although policies have been introduced to provide tax and financing support for industries and small businesses heavily impacted by the epidemic, service companies were still concerned about uncertainties resulting from the epidemic.

    In sum, Goldman concludes that the Caixin and NBS PMI surveys suggest activity growth in February was extremely weak. We expect service activity to partially recover in March, but in absolute level, it might take longer for services activities to normalize than manufacturing activities.

    Additionally, the Composite Output Index signaled the sharpest decline in total Chinese business activity on record in February, as company closures and travel restrictions were put in place due to the coronavirus outbreak.

    “The Caixin China Composite Output Index dropped to 27.5 in February from 51.9 in the previous month. While the gauges for new orders, new export orders and employment all weakened to their lowest levels on record, the gauge for backlogs of work rose to a record high. The decline in input costs was greater than that in output prices because upstream industries’ supply capacity was less affected.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    “The coronavirus epidemic has obviously impacted China’s economy. It is necessary to pay attention to the divergence of business sentiment between the manufacturing and the service sectors. While recent supportive policies for manufacturing, small businesses and industries heavily affected by the epidemic have had a more obvious effect on the manufacturing sector, it is more difficult for service companies to make up their cash flow losses.

    And as China’s Composite PMI collapses, US and Japan are also in contraction with Europe – for now – somehow managing to cling to expansion…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    But the funniest thing of all is the fact that Chinese stocks are dramatically outperfoming US and European since the start of the crisis…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Thanks National Team for making it all seem awesome!


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 20:57

  • School In Brooklyn Hands Out "Drag Queen In Training" Stickers To 4-Year-Old
    School In Brooklyn Hands Out “Drag Queen In Training” Stickers To 4-Year-Old

    Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

    A school in Brooklyn reportedly handed out stickers to 4-year-old children during a ‘drag queen story time’ event that said “drag queen in training.”

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    According to Twitter user @beyondreasdoubt, the stickers were handed out by the unnamed private school during a “family day” that included the appearance of drag queens.

    While leftists continue to deny that ‘drag queen story time’ is sexual in nature, despite the very performative nature of drag queens being similar to burlesque dancers, examples proving it is sexual continue to emerge.

    As we highlighted yesterday, a video clip out of the UK showed a drag queen teaching toddlers how to twerk, a sexual dance where the participant repeatedly gyrates their butt in the air.

    As we highlighted last week, many drag queens have engaged in sexually explicit behavior, including one called ‘Flowjob’ who visited a primary school in Scotland after posting pictures of himself on Twitter using a dildo and a ball gag.

    A separate video that caused controversy last week also showed a drag queen dancing suggestively in front of a little girl while adults in the room cheered and applauded.

    Last year during a speech in front of the Lafayette Library Board of Control in Louisiana, drag queen Dylan Pontiff candidly admitted the true purpose of drag queen story time.

    “This is going to be the grooming of the next generation,” he said.

    An admitted pedophile and convicted child porn peddler also wrote an article in which he describes ‘Desmond is Amazing’ – the 12-year-old drag queen kid – as “hot”.

    Reacting to concerns over Desmond’s performance at a gay night club in New York where attendees threw money at the child, his mother defended the decision, telling an Australian TV show, “I don’t understand what the controversy is.”

    Desmond was previously involved in ‘drag queen story time’ – in which drag queens visit schools and libraries across America to read to children.

    One of the participants at a drag queen story time event in Houston, 32-year-old Albert Garza, later turned out to be a registered sex offender who was convicted of assaulting an eight-year-old boy in 2008.

    *  *  *

    My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me. Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here. Support my sponsor – Emergency Survival Foods – delicious dishes & a 25 year shelf life!


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 20:45

  • Japanese Official Says Olympics Can Be Postponed As Virus Fears Surge
    Japanese Official Says Olympics Can Be Postponed As Virus Fears Surge

    A week after Japan started canceling sport and cultural events amid the broadening of the Covid-19 outbreak,  Seiko Hashitomo, Japan’s Olympic minister, raised the very real prospect of postponing The Olympic Games.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    With deaths and cases soaring in Japan (now at almost 300 cases – ex Diamond Princess – and 12 deaths, though the numbers are widely questioned), Fox News reports that Hashimoto told the upper house of parliament:

    “The IOC has the right to cancel the Games only if they are not held during 2020,” she

    “This can be interpreted to mean the games can be postponed as long as they are held during the calendar year.”

    Asked whether she believed the Games would be held if the coronavirus outbreak worsened, she replied:

    “We are making the utmost effort so that we don’t have to face that situation.”

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Notably, Japan’s Olympic Minister’s position is at odds with International Olympic Committee (IOC) member Dick Pound, who told AP News last Wednesday that the Games would most likely be canceled, rather than postponed if the outbreak continued to worsen in the months ahead.

    Pound said there’s a three-month window to decide the fate of the Games:

    “You could certainly go to two months out if you had to,” he said, which would mean the decision would come around late May.

    “A lot of things have to start happening. You’ve got to start ramping up your security, your food, the Olympic Village, the hotels, the media folks will be in there building their studios.”

    He noted that if the virus outbreak continued to deteriorate, then “you’re probably looking at a cancellation.”

    “This is the new war, and you have to face it. In and around that time, I’d say folks are going to have to ask: ‘Is this under sufficient control that we can be confident about going to Tokyo, or not?'” he said. 

    He added:

    You just don’t postpone something on the size and scale of the Olympics. There are so many moving parts, so many countries and different seasons, and competitive seasons, and television seasons. You can’t just say, we’ll do it in October.”

    Pound said, moving the Games to another city is highly unlikely.

    “To move the place is difficult because there are few places in the world that could think of gearing up facilities in that short time to put something on,” he said.

    Since 1896, the Olympics have only been canceled during wartime. And in 1976, 1980 and 1984 faced boycotts.

    The longer the outbreak continues, the more uncertainty it would create for Olympic organizers. All eyes on May.


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 20:25

  • There Are Now Over 7,000 Cryptocurrency ATMs Worldwide
    There Are Now Over 7,000 Cryptocurrency ATMs Worldwide

    Authored by Benjamin Pirus via CoinTelegraph.com,

    The number of crypto ATMs across the globe has grown to over 7,000, with machines in 75 countries.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    image courtesy of CoinTelegraph

    At press time, CoinATMRadar listed 7,014 cryptocurrency ATMs in existence. This number also includes machines hosting digital currencies other than Bitcoin (BTC), including assets such as Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Ether (ETH), Dash (DASH) and Litecoin (LTC).

    Crypto ATMs have come a long way

    The world saw its first Bitcoin ATM in 2013, when a company called Robocoin placed a machine in a Vancouver coffee shop. Allowing customers to trade Bitcoin for cash, and vice versa, the machine saw $10,000 in BTC transacted on its launch day.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    At present, 42 different manufacturers are responsible for the 7,000 global crypto ATMs.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Only two locations host Robocoin ATMs, CoinATMRadar data showed. Genesis Coin sits in the lead with machines in 2,348 locations.

    Digital asset ATMs keep coming

    The world now sees 11.7 new crypto ATMs installed per day, according to CoinATMRadar’s data from the past seven days.

    Last fall, Bitcoin ATM company Bitstop teamed up with massive United States-based mall operator Simon Malls, spurring the installation of five machines in five separate malls run by the operator.

    Florida’s Miami International Airport also received a Bitcoin ATM from Bitstop in the latter half of 2019.

    Crypto ATMs only recently surpassed the 6,000 landmark in November 2019, showing a growing public demand for cryptocurrency availability. This type of data shows digital asset adoption and presence continues waging forward, one step at a time.


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 20:05

  • Americans Will Soon See More US Military Members In Turbans, Beards & Hijabs
    Americans Will Soon See More US Military Members In Turbans, Beards & Hijabs

    Americans could soon begin seeing the unusual sight of US military service members walking around in Islamic hijab and other religious garb like turbans.

    This after the United States Air Force dramatically changed its dress code policy last month to allow airmen to wear religious apparel so long as it presents an overall “professional and well-groomed appearance.”

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    US Air Force/Army photographs

    According to the newest update to the “Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel” code, material used for religious headwear must fit the assigned uniform color, including camouflage.

    Furthermore, beards will be allowed for religious reasons. Individual members must request permission for unshorn hair and facial hair, but upon exceeding two inches the regulations call for it to be “rolled and/or or tied” to meet the new standards.

    US Air Force adherents to the Muslim and Sikh faiths are those most likely to take advantage of the loosening uniform changes — the latter which are now also authorized to wear under-turbans or patkas even in indoor areas (where headwear is typically removed).

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Image via ACLU

    But a couple of military members identifying with “Norse Heathen faiths” have already stepped up to claim a religious exemption for their beards, as The Air Force Times explains

    Airman 1st Class Harpreetinder Singh Bajwa in June 2019 became the first active-duty Sikh airman allowed to wear a turban, beard and long hair, which Sikhs tie in a bun and then cover with the turban.

    And at least two airmen who follow the Norse Heathen, or pagan, faiths have been granted permission to wear a beard.

    The new uniform regulations note, however, that the individual’s chain of command can order the removal of religious headgear in various circumstances if it “furthers a compelling governmental interest.”

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Image via ACLU/FOX News

    One example would be for exercises involving the necessity of donning a chemical/biological gas mask, which must fit snuggly over the head.

    For years the US armed services resisted such religious accommodation, emphasizing standard “clean cut” uniformity and appearance across the board — but various “religious freedom” lawsuits were recently brought by the ACLU, which began to drive limited policy changes. 


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 19:45

  • Super Tuesday: Biden Wins VA, NC, AL, OK, TN, MN, AR, MA; Bernie Wins CA, VT, CO, UT; Bloomberg Wins American Samoa
    Super Tuesday: Biden Wins VA, NC, AL, OK, TN, MN, AR, MA; Bernie Wins CA, VT, CO, UT; Bloomberg Wins American Samoa

    Fourteen states, one territory and Democrats abroad are voting in the Super Tuesday presidential primaries, with 1,357 delegates to the Democratic National Convention up for grabs.

    The big question remains – How will the coronavirus affect the turnout of millions of voters.

    And the results begin:

    • Biden wins Virginia, North Carolina, Alabama, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Minnesota, Arkansas, Massachusetts

    • Bernie wins Vermont, Colorado, Utah, & California

    • Bloomberg wins American Samoa?

    The projected delegate count is:

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Source: NYTimes

    The Trump campaign puts out a statement:

    The results only increase the likelihood that no candidate will have enough delegates for a first ballot victory at their convention, which only means more chaos! The media is hyperventilating about Joe Biden but everyone should remember that he is just as terrible a candidate right now as he was a few days ago.”

    Even if Bernie is not on November’s ballot, his big government socialist ideas will be because they have become mainstream in today’s Democrat Party. President Trump will wipe the floor with whatever Democrat is unlucky enough to be the nominee.”

    Details:

    VIRGINIA (99 delegates)

    Winner: Joe Biden

    The former VP got 66% of the black vote. Bloomberg was a distant third which is a major blow given the time and effort he focused in that state.

    VERMONT (16 delegates)

    Winner: Bernie Sanders

    100% expected to clinch his home state. Mike Bloomberg in 4th behind Warren

    NORTH CAROLINA (110 delegates)

    Winner: Joe Biden

    NBC’s Kornacki showing exit polls showing “a landslide” for Joe Biden in North Carolina. He’s crushing among African Americans and winning by double digits among white voters too.

    AMERICAN SAMOA (6 delegates)

    Winner: Mike Bloomberg

    “A decisive victory, we are led to believe, over Tulsi Gabbard…” says MSNBC’s Brian Williams on Bloomberg’s win in American Samoa.

    ALABAMA (52 delegates)

    Winner: Joe Biden

    Exit polls again showing huge support among African Americans powering Biden to a big win in Alabama, per MSNBC.

    OKLAHOMA (37 delegates)

    Winner: Joe Biden

    Fox is calling it for Joe – With 413 of 1,948 precincts reporting, Biden 32%, Sanders 23%, Bloomberg 17%, Warren 14%, Gabbard 2%.

    COLORADO (67 delegates)

    Winner: Bernie Sanders

    NBC project Bloomberg finishing second in Colorado.

    TENNESSEE (64 delegates)

    Winner: Joe Biden

    MINNESOTA (75 delegates)

    Winner: Joe Biden

    Biden winning Minnesota is first genuine whoa of the night, apparently after he was endorsed by Amy Klobuchar. Bernie Sanders carried the state in 2016.

    ARKANSAS (31 delegates)

    Winner: Joe Biden

    UTAH (29 delegates)

    Winner: Bernie Sanders

    Fox projects Sanders as the winner, Biden is 4th.

    MASSACHUSETTS (91 delegates)

    Winner: Joe Biden

    “They don’t call it Super Tuesday for nothing,” Biden says. Warren finishes 3rd in her home state.

    CALIFORNIA (415 delegates)

    Winner: Bernie Sanders

    Worth noting the significance of AP feeling confident enough to call Sanders winning California, the state with the largest number of delegates, immediately after polls closed. Sanders is polling 12 points ahead of Biden in California, according to Real Clear Politics average of polls.

    Developing…

    By the way, Donald Trump has a big lead in the race for the Republican presidential nomination. With 1,276 bound delegates needed to win, Trump has 548 delegates right now, versus former Massachusetts Gov. William Weld, with 1.

    *  *  *

    Biden is screaming ahead of Bernie in the prediction markets…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The market is bid on the back of Biden’s gains for now…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    When asked if Mike Bloomberg will drop out tonight, Bloomberg Campaign Manager Kevin Sheekey says, “absolutely not.” President Trump has other ideas..

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Hillary Clinton tells NPR she doesn’t plan to endorse anyone.

    “I am going to say the same thing I’ve been saying from the beginning of this vigorous primary contest: I hope the voters will pick the person that is most able to beat Donald Trump in the electoral college. At the end of the day, that is all that matters.”

    It appears The DNC have pulled out all the dirty tricks to defeat Bernie…

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    But, Sanders strikes a defiant tone.

    “Tonight I can tell you with absolute confidence we are going to win the Democratic nomination.”

    Trump tweets Warren was the loser of the night, other than Bloomberg, he says…

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    *  *  *

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Source: FiveThirtyEight.com

    *  *  *

    Lots more to come.

    • MAINE (24 delegates): Polls close at 8 p.m.

    • TEXAS (228 delegates): Polls close at 8 p.m.

    • DEMOCRATS ABROAD (13 delegates): Voting continues through March 10.

    *  *  *

    The Democratic presidential contenders are poised to face off on Tuesday in one of the most consequential contests of the primary race so far, with 14 states set to vote and 1,300 delegates up for grabs.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    As The Hill reports, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) heads into the contests as the front-runner after wins in New Hampshire and Nevada, as well as a virtual tie in Iowa, but former Vice President Joe Biden got a major boost after decisively winning South Carolina.

    However, it appears the money is piling into Biden as prediction markets now have him at 54% chance of getting the nomination (vs Bernie, who has plunged to 40%)…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Super Tuesday will also mark the debut of former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg on the ballot. He will join a race that has significantly winnowed over the past three days with Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg, and billionaire Tom Steyer all dropping out.

    The Primary Voters are considerably more diverse than recent primaries. Roughly four in 10 voters in today’s Democratic presidential primaries are people of color, according to the NBC News Exit Poll conducted in 12 of the 14 Super Tuesday states but today’s voters are on the older side – 64% of today’s Democratic voters are 45 or over, including the 29% of voters who are age 65 or over.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Here are the most crucial states to watch out for on Tuesday, according to The Hill: 

    California 

    California is the biggest prize of the evening, with 415 delegates up for grabs. 

    Sanders is currently the clear favorite to win the Golden State, but Biden has an opportunity to put a dent in his support. The RealClearPolitics average from the Democratic primary’s California polls shows Sanders with a nearly 17 point lead over his rivals, but Biden’s support has ticked up in a few recent polls.  A CBS News/YouGov poll released Monday showed Sanders with 31 percent support in the state and Biden at 19 percent support, with Warren at 18 percent. Biden also stands to benefit in the state if he receives the support of former Buttigieg and Klobuchar voters. That would give him a better chance of reaching the 15 percent viability threshold in the state, providing him with a share of the delegates even if he does not win the state as a whole.  “We’re no longer dividing the pot between four, five or six people. We’re dividing it between three people,” said Kelly Dietrich, the founder and head of the National Democratic Training Committee, which trains Democrats to run for public office. However, it still remains to be seen what influence Bloomberg will have in the state where he’s spent $36 million on advertising alone.  “I think he’s going to have trouble competing in California,” Democratic strategist Brad Bannon said. “The fact that Joe Biden is a stronger candidate than he was three days ago hurts Bloomberg, who is also in the moderate lane.”  “Part of Bloomberg’s vote strategy was associated with [Biden’s] weakness, and Biden is now a stronger candidate,” he said. 

    Texas 

    The Lone Star State has the second-most delegates up for grabs, at 228. Sanders is leading in the state, but by a much narrower gap than in California. 

    The RealClearPolitics polling average in Texas’s Democratic primary puts Sanders six points ahead of Biden.  Sanders is relying on his strong support among the Latino community in the state after he was propelled to victory in Nevada thanks in large part to Hispanic voters. A poll conducted by the firm Latino Decisions for Univision and the University of Houston’s Center for Mexican American Studies, shows Sanders polling at 31 percent support among Texas Hispanics, while Bloomberg and Biden trailed at 23 and 19 percent, respectively. The poll was released before South Carolina’s primary. Moe Vela, a Democratic strategist and White House adviser in the Clinton and Obama administrations, said Biden will need to improve his standing among the Hispanic community in order to perform well in states like Texas.  “As much credit as you have to give Bernie Sanders, I also have to say the vice president’s campaign needs to get their act together when it comes to the Latino electorate,” Vella, who sits on the board of Transparent Business, told The Hill. 

    Massachusetts 

    The Bay State could prove to be a death knell for Warren’s campaign if she does not perform well.

    Despite her high name recognition and endorsements from some of the state’s progressive lawmakers, including Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Joe Kennedy (D-Mass.), recent polling shows Warren slipping in her home state. Suffolk University/Boston Globe/WBZ-TV poll released on Saturday shows Warren’s fellow New Englander Sanders leading with 24 percent support in the state, while she trailed at 22 percent, within the survey’s 4.4-percentage point margin of error. A WBUR survey released earlier last week showed an even wider gap, with Sanders at 25 percent support and Warren at 17 percent support. That poll’s margin of error was plus or minus 4.9 percentage points.  Warren’s performance in New Hampshire could offer some insight into how well she will perform in Massachusetts. The Granite State is famous for choosing New England candidates, voting for Sanders in 2016 and 2020. Warren, by contrast, came in fourth in New Hampshire, behind Midwesterners Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar.  “I think she definitely has to win Massachusetts tomorrow, in part to go out to the next wave of states,” Bannon said. [How] can you make a plea for votes there when you can’t win your own state?”

    Virginia 

    Virginia has the fourth largest share of delegates of the Super Tuesday contests and Bloomberg has paid close attention to the state.

    Bloomberg has visited Virginia seven times, more than any other Super Tuesday state. The campaign has eight offices across the commonwealth, including in the Republican-leaning strongholds of Danville and Roanoke. More than 80 Bloomberg staffers are dispersed throughout Virginia. His campaign cites the need to keep the state blue after the legislature flipped to Democrats in 2019 and points to his heavy investment in advocating for stronger gun control measures in Virginia. The issue has played a central role in the state’s political discourse since the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting. “Virginia is a microcosm of one part of the future of the party, you know the moderate, progressive and suburban voters,” senior Bloomberg adviser Tim O’Brien told The Hill. Bloomberg himself touted his own work in the state’s 2019 elections during a get-out-the-vote event in McLean on Saturday. “It [was] so important to help flip the Virginia legislature blue this fall, and I was glad to help get it done,” Bloomberg said to a boisterous crowd. However, a number of recent polls show Bloomberg trailing Sanders and Biden in the state. Biden, in particular, could hurt Bloomberg’s chances in the state after a big win in South Carolina.Biden was also endorsed by a number of notable Democratic figures in Virginia recently. Former Gov. Terry McAuliffe, Sen. Tim Kaine, Rep. Elaine Luria, and Rep. Bobby Scott were all on hand for a Biden rally in Norfolk on Sunday evening where the former vice president received a rock star-like reception. 

    Alabama 

    African American voters make up a large share of the Democratic vote in Alabama, making the state critical for candidates looking to appeal to a voting group that is widely considered the backbone of the Democratic Party. 

    Five Thirty-Eight’s forecast shows Biden with a 61 percent chance of winning the state. The former vice president stands to perform well with African American voters after an overwhelming win in South Carolina. Biden received a warm welcome in Selma on Sunday at an event marking the anniversary of the civil rights march. “The moderate African Americans tend to be the majority of the Democratic Party, or at least a large part,” Democratic strategist Jamal Simmons told The Hill. “Older African Americans who tend to be the leadership of these big parties in the states like Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, they tend to be very pragmatic, if not more moderate. So that means they’re more likely to be Joe Biden voters.” While Sanders has relied on younger voters of color for support, he and Biden appeared to split the black youth vote in South Carolina, which might not bode well for the progressive senator in Alabama. “Bernie didn’t have his over performance with young African-Americans that he had in other places,” Simmons said, referring to South Carolina.

    Who would Trump prefer? For now, prediction markets appear confident that whoever it is, Trump will win…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 19:43

  • The Places In America With The Best (And Worst) Hospitals
    The Places In America With The Best (And Worst) Hospitals

    Via Priceonomics.com,

    Medical outcomes and the quality of healthcare are incredibly difficult to measure in America.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Patients often see many different doctors and hospitals and each of them administering small parts of the patient care. Getting the data from these disparate providers and assessing their relation to patient outcomes is next to impossible. Not only that, but how do you measure patient outcomes exactly? If a patient dies, is it because they got bad care or because they were extremely sick.

    Amidst this chaos, there is one data source attempting to rate the quality of healthcare, particularly in hospitals — Medicare. Medicare, for those who are not familiar, is the federally funded insurance organization for senior citizens. Because virtually all spending and treatment for this population flows through Medicare, it’s in a unique position to measure hospital quality.

    Starting April 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS.gov) started releasing hospital quality rankings. This data was most recently updated in January 2020. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CMS.gov, is part of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS.gov).

    Along with Priceonomics customer PsyDPrograms.org, we decided to analyze this Medicare hospital quality data to see the states and cities with the best (and worst) hospitals in America. 

    On the state level, Wisconsin, South Dakota and Utah have the best hospitals on average while Washington DC, New York, and Nevada have the worst-rated ones. Among the major cities we looked at Cincinnati, Austin and Indianapolis ranked as having the best hospitals, while Las Vegas, Brooklyn, and Washington DC ranked as having the worst.

    *  *  *

    Before diving into the data, it’s worth spending a moment on the methodology.

    For this analysis we looked at the CMS “Overall Hospital Quality Star Ranking” made most recently available in January 2020. In this data set, 3,698 hospitals were scored on a rating from 1 to 5 stars, with 5 stars being the best.

    The CMS outlines their methodology for creating and the scoring hospitals here, which includes 57 different measures in categories such as patient experience, mortality, and safety of care. While this data is for Medicare and Medicaid patients, these hospitals tend to service patients of all age groups and income levels.

    To begin, let’s look at which states have the highest rated hospitals on average according to the CMS. We group all hospitals by state and then calculate the average among hospitals that were given a star rating by the CMS. Below are all 50 states plus Washington, DC, ranked from states with the highest score to the lowest:

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Wisconsin hospitals rank as the top in the country, with a 3.9 average quality score. Part of the reason for the state’s success is that it has a high number of Mayo Clinic hospitals in the state, all of which got over 5 stars. In South Dakota the Avera hospital network has five hospitals attaining the 5 star ranking.

    Washington DC ranks as the area with the worst rated hospitals with a 1.4 star rating on average. While better rated hospitals are available in nearby Maryland and Virginia, DC hospitals have been criticized for failing at patient safety and maternal health. New York has the second worst CMS hospital ratings, despite spending more than any other state on healthcare.

    Next, let’s extend this analysis to determine which cities have the best and worst rated hospitals according to the CMS. The chart below shows the average star quality in cities with at least 7 rated hospitals. Cities are ranked from highest average score to lowest:

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Cincinnati ranks as the city with the highest rated hospitals in the United States, just beating out Austin and Indianapolis. Each of the top cities have mostly 5 and 4 star hospitals. On the other end of the spectrum, Las Vegas ranks as the the city with the worst rated hospitals in the country. Nearly every hospital in Las Vegas attains a 1-star rating, the lowest score given by the CMS. Part of this low score can be attributed to a shortage of doctors in the state of Nevada.

    Lastly, is there any difference in quality score based on who owns the hospital? Do non-profits provide better quality of care over for-profits? Or are government organizations more effective? The chart below shows the average rating by ownership type:

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    By a considerable margin, physician-owned properties have the highest rating with a 3.9 average quality score. While there were only 34 of these types of properties rated by the CMS (approximately 1% of rated hospitals), it may be worth exploring if physician-owned hospitals have the promise to deliver better healthcare. State and Federal hospitals rank last when it comes to quality, just beating out proprietary (private hospitals).

    *  *  *

    The CMS hospital data reveals there are huge disparities in the quality of care across America. For example, if you live in Las Vegas, almost every single hospital available is rated one-star. Other places like Cincinnati or Austin are virtually all four or five-star hospitals. While measuring health care quality is a challenging effort, the CMS data is a great starting point for finding out which hospitals are offering quality care and which ones are not.  As the old adage goes, you can’t improve what you don’t measure.

    *  *  *

    If you’re a company that wants to work with Priceonomics to turn your data into great stories, learn more about the Priceonomics Data Studio


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 19:25

  • "It's Life Or Death For Us" – Maryland's Seafood Industry In Crisis Over H-2B Visa Program Cap
    “It’s Life Or Death For Us” – Maryland’s Seafood Industry In Crisis Over H-2B Visa Program Cap

    Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf said last week that there’s no decision yet to raise the cap on the H-2B visa program for seasonal workers, and this could complicate things for Maryland’s seafood industry heading into crab season.

    There are at least nine crab picking houses scattered in Dorchester County, Maryland, which produce about 95% of the state’s crab meat. Many operators are now warning the state government that they will have to scale back operations without an ample supply of seasonal workers from the H-2B visa program, reported the Maryland Department of Agriculture

    “Blue crabs are an integral part of our state’s heritage and our economy,” said Secretary of Agriculture Joe Bartenfelder. “The world-class crabmeat produced by Maryland processors relies heavily on the availability of seasonal labor via the H-2B visa program. This survey reinforces what we have learned in previous years: a lack of reliable access to H-2B workers poses a major threat to the future of this iconic industry.”

    Many of these crab picking businesses are family-owned and operated and are now on the brink of shuttering their doors without the proper access to cheap labor.

    “It’s life or death for us,” said Bryan Hall, with W Hall & Son Hand Picked.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    CBS Baltimore said seafood operators along the Chesapeake Bay heavily rely on the temporary work visa program to supply cheap labor. 

    “Right now, there are six of us in danger of not opening up at all this year,” said John Walker, with Phillips AE Sons.

    Walker said after a century in business, there’s the uncertainty that operations in 2020 could remain closed as labor shortages persist.

    “If we do not get these pickers, we’re closed,” Walker said.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The Department of Agriculture warned that if additional help is not seen on the Chesapeake Bay during the start of the crab season, the industry could lose as much as $150 million.

    “If you take 2.54 American jobs created by each one of these folks that come here, we’re looking at over 1,000 jobs, American jobs, that are dependent on these visas,” said Jack Brooks, with the Chesapeake Bay Seafood Foundation.

    Crab season starts on April 1, and if cheap labor isn’t supplied to crab pickers via the H-2B program in the next couple of weeks, it could turn out to be a disastrous year for Maryland’s beloved seafood industry.


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 19:05

  • Majority Of Coronavirus Deaths Reported Outside China For First Time Since Outbreak Began: Live Updates
    Majority Of Coronavirus Deaths Reported Outside China For First Time Since Outbreak Began: Live Updates

    Summary:

    • US virus death toll hits 9
    • 2nd case confirmed in NY
    • Oregon officials warn up to 500 cases may be in state already
    • US now screening everyone aboard flights from SK and Italy
    • Spain reports 1st death
    • 1st case confirmed in North Carolina
    • Westchester Temple closes
    • Italy mulls cancelling all sporting events for a month
    • 2nd NY case commuted to Manhattan, traveled to Miami
    • Chile, Argentina report first cases
    • Germany reports 46 new cases
    • 2nd case confirmed in New Hampshire
    • Santa Clara confirms 11th case
    • 1st case reported in Berkeley
    • Third case possibly identified in Fla.
    • Stocks surge, then fade, after surprise 50 bp rate cut
    • 4th person dies in France
    • Fauci says we should know soon whether Gilead’s vaccine will work
    • Son of Westchester corona case attended NYC school that closed
    • Pope tests negative for coronavirus
    • NYC high school closes over ‘suspected case of coronavirus’
    • Global case total passes 91,000
    • UK case total hits 51
    • US case total tops 100 across 15 states (including evacuees)
    • South Korea case total passes 5,000; death toll hits 34
    • Italian death toll surpasses Iran
    • Iran confirmed cases pass 2,000, 70+ dead
    • Head of European football says Euro 2020 will go on
    • 9 new cases confirmed in Japan

    * * *

    Update (19305ET): Here are a few late-breaking virus stories we’d like to add before we starting winding down for the day.

    Alphabet became the latest tech giant to cancel its developer conference (following Facebook’s lead): the annual Google I/O event has been cancelled over coronavirus fears.

    Meanwhile, the Italian government is about to release a series of recommendations to try to halt the coronavirus outbreak, the Guardian reports.

    The tips are contained in a document issued by the the country’s scientific committee that will be released within the next few hours. They include:

    Social distancing: remaining away from crowded environments and maintaining a distance of two meters from other people; especially within enclosed spaces.

    Greetings: avoiding kisses and hugs when greeting people.

    Elderly population: people older than 75 years with underlying health conditions are advised to remain at home and avoid social events.

    Moreover, the Juventus and Milan’s upcoming Italian Cup semi-final second leg match has been postponed. The match was meant to be held on Wednesday night and would have followed the 1-1 first-leg draw in Milan’s San Siro. The committee has called for all sporting events to be held behind closed doors.

    The death toll from Covid-19 in Italy has risen to 79 and confirmed cases to 2.263, the emergency commissioner and civil protection chief Angelo Borrelli has said.

    According to Reuters, Irish authorities have confirmed a second case of coronavirus, a woman in the the country’s east who just returned from Italy – yet another example of how the virus has spread from Italy all across Europe, as European bureaucrats have opted to leave their borders open.

    “Today we are confirming that Ireland has diagnosed one new case of COVID-19. The case arises in a female in the east of the country and is associated with travel from Northern Italy,” Dr Tony Holohan, Chief Medical Officer with the Department of Health told a news briefing.

    Earlier, Ford became the latest company to limit travel for employees after two in China caught the virus, per Reuters.

    Meanwhile, Lyft CEO Brian Roberts told his audience at the KeyBanc Capital Markets 15th Annual Emerging Technology Summit in San Francisco that the outbreak had not yet impacted demand for Lyft’s ride-hailing services, per Reuters. The bulk of the company’s business is US focused.

    Earlier we reported that deaths in Italy climbed to 79 on Tuesday as health officials reported 27 new deaths tied to the virus, surpassing the 77 on Iran’s official death toll.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The total number of cases in Europe’s worst-hit country climbed to 2,502 from 2,036 on Monday.

    * * *

    Update (1845ET): Santa Clara County reported 2 additional cases on Tuesday afternoon, increasing the number of cases in the county to 11, according to KTVU.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Both of the new cases are still under investigation to determine the source of transmission, the health department said in a news release. Currently, of the total, only two have been determined to be transmited from person to person, four are travel-related; three are close contacts to known cases; and the two new cases remain under investigation, health officials said.

    In other news, a Berkeley resident who recently returned from traveling in Europe has become the first confirmed patient in Berkeley.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    It sure has been an eventful 24 hours…

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    * * *

    Update (1835ET): Germany has reported another 46 cases, increasing its total to 196.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    How much more will it take before they stop jawboning and start spending?

    Meanwhile, the US is tightening border controls.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    * * *
    Update (1810ET): As investors turn their attention to the 14 Super Tuesday primaries, with bulls everywhere pulling for a strong showing from Joe Biden, who appears to have prevailed over his challengers. For somebody who was considered the ‘presumptive’ nominee at the beginning of the contest, Biden almost didn’t make it, and if it wasn’t for Mike Bloomberg’s debate implosion, he would likely be where Bloomberg is now (except, without the limitless funds, Biden would be forced to concede a whole lot earlier).

    So let’s review: Around the world, about 40 deaths have been attributed to the virus in the past 24 hours outside mainland China, while only 31 deaths were reported in China during the same period, marking the first time that deaths ex-China surpassed deaths in mainland China, according to NBC News.

    With three more deaths in Washington State confirmed on Tuesday, the US is stealing the spotlight from South Korea, which, thanks to its much smaller economy, doesn’t have the same kind of influence over global markets. Around the world, some 3,100 people have died from the virus since the outbreak began.

    New Hampshire confirmed the most recent case at around 6 pm ET.

    Almost equally alarming: The New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services reported that the state’s first infected patient attended an invitation-only private event on Friday, Feb. 28, despite being told to remain in isolation. That patient was identified only as an employee of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. It’s unclear whether the second patient was exposed as a result.

    For anybody in the US who hasn’t voted, the CDC has issued some tips for how to not catch the virus while voting.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Here’s a map of US cases so far, courtesy of  NBC News:

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

     

    * * *

    Update (1740ET): The confirmation that a Westchester lawyer from New Rochelle who works at an office near Grand Central is New York’s second coronavirus case has set off a wave of quarantines, including a school where the infected is part of the ‘feeder network’ – he doesn’t even have a kid currently going there.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Now, Temple Young Israel in New Rochelle is closing temporarily, and guests who attended two events at the temple late last month have been asked to self-quarantine.

    The health department of Westchester County, New York, ordered Temple Young Israel in New Rochelle to halt all services immediately due to potential coronavirus exposure connected to a member of the congregation. The congregant, an attorney who tested positive for the virus Tuesday, was reported in serious condition at New York Presbyterian Hospital.

    Congregants who attended services on Feb. 22 and a funeral and a bat mitzvah on Feb. 23 must self-quarantine until at least March 8, Westchester health officials said. Those who don’t comply will be required to do so, officials said.
    The synagogue has 380 member families, according to its website.

    Oh, and just as we suggested earlier, it’s believed that the patient did travel on Metro North, the most obvious public-transit route between his home and office, according to the New York Post.

    The patient has two kids, one who attends the high school in Riverdale, and the other who attends college in the city.

    * * *

    Update (1700ET): Most of the focus on Tuesday has lingered on Washington and New York State. But officials in Oregon are reportedly warning that there could be between 300 and 500 Oregonians who were unknowingly exposed to the virus, according to Dr. Dean Sidelinger, the state health officer and epidemiologist, the Oregonian reports.

    The advance of coronavirus to a remote town more than 200 miles from Portland means the virus “is fairly widespread in our community.” On Monday, officials announced Oregon’s third presumptive coronavirus case. The person is a casino worker who attended a youth basketball game at a Umatilla County middle school.

    Also, officials have confirmed that deceased patients No. 8 and No. 9 were both diagnosed with the virus postuhumously, helping to explain some of they mystery surrounding their cases. Two of the three deaths reported Tuesday died last week.

    * * *

    Update (1610ET): Some footage of President Trump from a press conference earlier in the day, where he said “anything can happen” with the virus, sounding slightly less dismissive of the risks.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Meanwhile, for American stocks, it was a “not-so-super Tuesday” as the risk of a prolonged pandemic in the US and across the world appeared to climb.

    Trump added during a brief meeting with reporters after the market closed that he felt the Fed wouldn’t do more and “that’s unfortunate”, he added that the economy is in “great shape” and added that one vaccine is heading to trials and other remedies are being tested – he even mentioned the possibility of a middle class tax cut.

    * * *

    Update (1535ET): A special committee guiding Italy’s virus response has reportedly recommended that the government force the cancellation of every sporting event in the country for a month, stopping football just weeks before Euro 2020.

    Earlier, the organizers of Euro 2020 said the virus wouldn’t stop the tournament.

    As the virus spreads across the US, one notable standout is Hawaii, which hasn’t confirmed a single case despite facing several scares early on. On Tuesday, local media reported that the annual Honolulu Festival has been cancelled over virus fears, according to Hawaii News Now.

    Meanwhile, we’re hearing reports that the lawyer who is the second case of the virus in New York worked at a firm based in Grand Central, increasing the probability that he took public transit, like the Metro North commuter train on the New Haven line that passes through his home town of New Rochelle.

    On Capitol Hill, an emergency funding bill to finance the fight against the coronavirus could be completed and ready for the signature of the US president Donald Trump by Friday evening, Senator Patrick Leahy said.

    Mike Pence and Chuck Schumer met on Tuesday, and talks were reportedly productive, with a deal possible in the near future.

    Algeria has confirmed three new cases, bringing the country’s total to eight, according to the nation’s health ministry.

    Ireland has confirmed a second case on Tuesday; like the first, it was tied to travelers to Italy, something that’s becoming a theme as the virus spreads from Italy across the continent.

    * * *

    Update (1530ET): Officials have confirmed the first case of the virus in North Carolina, Reuters reports. This comes after state officials in Georgia, New Hampshire and Florida among others have confirmed their first cases as the virus nears the point of spreading to half of the 48 states in the Continental US (though, importantly, Hawaii has had some close calls).

    Meanwhile, here’s a handy breakdown of the cases in Washington State, the hardest hit state so far.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    All 27 cases are clustered in two counties considered to be ‘suburban Seattle’, making the Washington outbreak the largest concentration detected to date by the US public health system.

    * * *

    Update (1520ET): The WHO said during its Tuesday press conference that the death rate for Covid-19 is higher than the 2% previously believed.

    “More people are susceptible to infection and some will suffer serious disease. Globally about 3.4 percent of COVID-19 cases have died,” he said. “By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1 percent of those infected.”

    By comparison, the flu kills 0.1% of those infected. The WHO credited the “rapidly growing insight” into the virus thanks to the research that has been carried out since the outbreak began.

    * * *

    Update (1455ET): Reuters has confirmed two additional deaths in Washington State on top of the one reported earlier by the NYT.

    • WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REPORTS TOTAL NUMBER OF CONFIRMED CORONAVIRUS CASES NOW STANDS AT 27, INCLUDING 9 DEATHS, UP FROM 18 CASES AND 6 DEATHS ON MONDAY

    As BNO pointed out, we were also initially confused about whether these were two additional deaths, or if there was an overlap with the case reported earlier by NYT.

    Turns out, there wasn’t.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    In addition, there are now 27 confirmed cases in Washington alone, nearly double the number in the entire US (outside the evacuees) a week ago. The death toll in the US has climbed to 9, all in Washington State. At this rate, the state’s death toll is climbing faster than the 10-year yield is falling.

    By BNO’s count, the US case total has climbed to 111.

    Meanwhile, as more patients report being unable to receive coronavirus tests, or of being hit with a hefty medical bill after receiving a negative test, President Trump said Tuesday that he would look into getting insurance companies to cover coronavirus-related costs.

    * * *

    Update (1420ET): A seventh individual has died of the coronavirus in the suburban Seattle. This time, the case wasn’t identified until long after the patient died, according to the NYT. Since the individual died last week, they are technically the earliest known fatality from the infection.

    The person was brought to Seattle’s Harborview Medical Center on Feb. 24 and died two days later, before the outbreak really hit the state.

    A spokeswoman for the hospital said on Tuesday that test samples from the person, who was a resident of the same nursing home that has had a number of coronavirus cases and deaths, have tested positive for the virus.

    “In coordination with Public Health, we have determined that some staff may have been exposed while working in an intensive care unit where the patient had been treated,” said Susan Gregg.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    The Dow is about to be down 1,000 on the day once again, despite the Fed’s emergency 60 bp rate cut.

    In Iran, officials will release 54,000 inmates to curb the spread of the coronavirus in its prisons.

    How could things get any worse? Maybe if officials confirm a slate of already-dead individuals actually died from the virus.

    Elsewhere, officials in Spain reported the country’s first death, after reporting 129 cases earlier on Tuesday. Chile and Argentina have also reported their first cases as the virus spreads in Latin America. Reporters also confirmed that the 2nd case identified in NY state is an example of “community transmission”, having no obvious source of infection.

    * * *

    Update (1325ET): Following reports last night about a Miami woman who was denied proper testing despite suspicions she might be infected, state officials have identified a third coronavirus case in Florida, according to local media reports.

    Mirroring the situation in the states, Boris Johnson has been accused of playing down the coronavirus emergency in the UK. Two hours after he delivered a speech claiming the government’s No. 1 priority is containing the virus, about which he said there’s no need to panic, the NHS declared the outbreak a “Level 4 incident”, its possible alert level.

    In other news, Bloomberg reports that a Florida student whose classmates shook hands last Friday with the vice president has been quarantined after his mother came into contact with a coronavirus patient.

    Put another way: BBG is essentially reporting that Pence shook hands with someone, who knows someone, who knows someone who interacted with a coronavirus patient. How did they even figure that out?

    * * *

    Update (1250ET): As we reported yesterday, the IMF and World Bank have apparently confirmed rumors that they will hold their annual meetings ‘virtually’, instead of holding the annual massive gatherings in Washington.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    * * *

    Update (1155ET): Italian health officials have confirmed another rash of cases and deaths: The Italian death toll of patients who have tested positive for the virus has risen to 79 from 52, surpassing the ‘official’ death toll in Iran (though most suspect the real numbers are far higher in Iran).

    Meanwhile, the total number of cases has climbed to 2,502, up from 2,036 late Monday.

    • ITALIAN DEATH TOLL OF PATIENTS WHO TESTED POSITIVE FOR CORONAVIRUS RISES TO 79 FROM 52
    • TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES IN ITALY RISES TO 2502 FROM 2036 ON MONDAY

    Most of the cases have been diagnosed in Lombardy, a region in the north that’s been the hardest hit (it’s also a major contributor to Italian GDP).

    * * *

    Update (1035ET): The WHO is holding its daily press conference, though they’ve been thoroughly upstaged by the Fed:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    * * *

    Update (1030ET): Some comments from Treasury Secretary Mnuchin during his testimony before the House:

    • MNUCHIN SAYS NOT CONSIDERING CHINA TARIFF ROLLBACK AT THIS TIME
    • MNUCHIN SAYS NOT ENOUGH INTEREST TO ISSUE 50 YR BOND
    • MNUCHIN: ‘THERE WILL BE SOME ISSUES’ FOR U.S. GDP THIS YEAR DUE TO CORONAVIRUS
    • MNUCHIN: CORONAVIRUS WILL BE WORSE THAN FLU

    Some comments from Dr. Anthony Fauci are also hitting the tape:

    • NIH OFFICIAL FAUCI SAYS WE SHOULD KNOW WITHIN SEVERAL MONTHS WHETHER OR NOT GILEAD’S ANTIVIRAL CORONAVIRUS TREATMENT WORKS, IMPLEMENTATION COULD BE IMMINENT AFTERWARD
    • NIH OFFICIAL FAUCI SAYS IT WILL BE AT LEAST A YEAR OR A YEAR AND A HALF UNTIL A CORONAVIRUS VACCINE IS READY TO BE DEPLOYED

    In other virus-related news, Al Jazeera reports that a fourth person in France has died from the virus. Yesterday, French officials confirmed a fourth death, before revising the death toll down to three blaming a reporting error. 6 new cases were confirmed earlier in Oman, while the Ayatollah urged Iranians to fight the virus’s spread by washing their hands.

    “Don’t violate the recommendations and instructions of the responsible authorities in terms of prevention, in terms of keeping hands, face and living environment clean and not infecting these and preventing the infection of these,” he said. Khamenei also said the outbreak should not be overblown.

    “The issue is an issue that will pass. It’s not something extraordinary,” he said. “I don’t want to minimize the issue but let’s not make it very big either.

    Let’s hope the Iranians are developing a more elaborate containment strategy.

    * * *

    Update (1012ET): The Fed sucker-punched shortsellers in the face Tuesday morning with a “surprise” emergency 50 bp rate cut, acquiescing to President Trump’s demands after the president went on a tear bashing Powell during last night’s Trump rally in NC.

    The news sent stocks AND gold higher. But amazingly, the rally in stocks is already starting to fade.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    But…but…but we though the only reason stocks were selling off is because the G7 suggested there wouldn’t be any cuts, which has now been exposed as part of an elaborate head-fake by central bankers to prime markets for maximum impact.

    And even after all that…clearly worries about a wealthy lawyer spreading the virus among the denizens of NYC’s white-shoe law firms and their clients is an image that traders can’t seem to escape.

    Looks like we’re gonna need another rate cut, Jerry.

    Before we go, we’d like to highlight some thoughts from WSJ editor Michael Derby.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    The Fed launched the review back in November 2018, following the first bout of Q4 volatility.

    And if ever there was a time for bold new thinking from the Fed, this is it. Because, as the market’s erratic response suggests, the same old policy prescription of rate cuts and QE isn’t going to cut it. Start buying stocks and doling out cash to the people like they did in Hong Kong, or log off.

    * * *

    Update (0950ET): Here are some more details from Cuomo’s presser, including announcing that the city is keeping two families in the Buffalo region ‘under observation’ and that the state legislature has approved a $40 million emergency aid package on Monday night.

    Governor Cuomo said the news of the second New York patient should not be a cause for alarm, reiterating that health officials had expected that the disease would be found in multiple locations around the state and would be likely to spread.

    “Yes, people are going to get infected,” the governor said, in an interview on Long Island News Radio, adding that “80 percent self-resolve,” referring to the estimated recovery rate for mild or asymptomatic cases.

    Mr. Cuomo said that the new patient is hospitalized and that he works in Manhattan, and had an underlying respiratory illness. The governor, a Democrat, said the state is also monitoring two families in the Buffalo region who had recently traveled to Italy, one the centers of Europe’s outbreaks.

    “The real issue is how many people will get seriously ill,” Mr. Cuomo said. “How many people, God forbid, could lose their lives.”

    Acting on a proposal by Mr. Cuomo, the state legislature approved on Monday night a $40 million emergency aid package to help the state Department of Health hire additional staff and equipment to help track and fight the disease.

    The NYT also reported that a high school in Westchester County had closed as a precautionary measure. The patient didn’t have any children at the school, but it said he’s a part of its feeder program. The patient is said to be a lawyer, and has been hospitalized at a hospital in Bronxville. He also reportedly recently visited Miami. The patient is said to have an “underlying respiratory illness” (he’s been transferred to New York-Presbyterian Hospital in Manhattan for maximal care). It’s unclear if he ever took public transportation.

    * * *

    Update (0920ET): In a statement, NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio revealed that the Westchester resident who became NY’s second coronavirus case was diagnosed in a city hospital. Their test was confirmed in a city lab during its first day of coronavirus operation.

    Recent media updates also claimed that the Westchester man works in Manhattan.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Additionally, Cuomo confirmed that the man recently traveled to Miami. Florida has confirmed more than 4 cases in different parts of the state. Later during the presser, Cuomo confirmed that the Riverdale school that closed was attended by the son of the Westchester patient, and that other schools might close as a precaution.

    In addition to the Riverdale school where one of the patient’s children attended closing, the Westchester Day School, a private Jewish day school in Mamaroneck, has closed out of an “abundance of caution” because the still-unidentified patient is part of its feeder program.

    The man was said to be a lawyer from New Rochelle, who is currently hospitalized at Lawrence Hospital in Bronxville.

    We still haven’t learned the identity of the woman who tested positive after visiting Iran, it’s unclear if we’ll ever learn this patient’s name.

    * * *

    Update (0855ET): During this morning’s press conference, Gov. Cuomo announced that New York public health officials have confirmed the second case of the coronavirus in the state, this time in a man in his 50s from Westchester County.

    Per the NYT, the patient was confirmed overnight via a state lab in Albany. Cuomo added that the two cases, which have no obvious connection to cases abroad, suggest that the virus may be “spreading in communities with no known connection to hot spots for the disease.”

    Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo announced on Tuesday morning a second confirmed case of coronavirus in New York, a man in his 50s in Westchester County, just outside of New York City, suggesting that it was spreading in communities with no known connection to hot spots for the disease.

    The patient, whose test was confirmed overnight by a state lab in Albany, had no direct connection with any known center of the contagion, which was first identified in China in late December.

    On Sunday, officials announced the state’s first case, a 39-year-old woman in Manhattan, a health care worker who had been visiting Iran, one of the epicenters of the virus’s rapid worldwide spread.

    Governor Cuomo said the news of the second New York patient should not be a cause for alarm, reiterating that health officials had expected that the disease would be found in multiple locations around the state and would be likely to spread.

    “We don’t see any direct connection,” Mr. Cuomo said, noting that the patient is hospitalized.

    So that’s one case in Manhattan (a woman who visited Iran) and one case in Westchester (with no obvious link to anyone) plus a school in Riverdale (right on the border of Westchester) closing because some may have been exposed to the virus.

    Also, more details on the school closing, per Reuters: The SAR Academy and SAR High School in Riverdale, in the Bronx ,is the school that will close to Tuesday.

    “At this time it important to remain calm,” according to the statement, which didn’t provide any more details.

    Readers who are too young to remember the 2003 SARS outbreak might not remember, but NYC narrowly avoided an outbreak when a doctor from Singapore who had been infected by a patient flew to NYC for a conference. He grew increasingly ill while in New York, eventually cutting short his trip and boarding a flight for home, as the NYT reminds us.

    Fortunately, the city already has MTA workers out in force disinfecting the subway.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    * * *

    Update (0840ET): With only one case confirmed in NYC, the hysteria is already descending, and it’s not limited to the Brooklyn Costco.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    An NYC high school said it will close Tuesday due to a “suspected case of coronavirus in its community.”

    • NEW YORK CITY HIGH SCHOOL SAYS CLOSED TUESDAY AFTER SUSPECTED CASE OF CORONAVIRUS IN ITS COMMUNITY – STATEMENT

    Stocks aren’t going to like that.

    Gov. Cuomo said he would hold a press conference to update the public at 9 am in New York.

    Last night, Cuomo tweeted that he would require NY health insurers to cover coronavirus-related costs for New Yorkers.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    We suspect we’ll know more soon.

    * * *

    Update (0800ET): UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock has confirmed 11 new cases in the UK, raising the total to 51.

    * * *

    Following the longest publicly-disclosed illness of Pope Francis’s papacy, the Vatican has confirmed that the leader of 1 billion Catholics has tested negative for the coronavirus. After days of insisting that the pope didn’t have the virus…somebody at the Vatican was clearly worried that the Pope might have been exposed.

    Pretty soon, millions of Americans and Europeans will know that feeling, if they don’t already.

    Yesterday, the death toll in the US climbed to 6, while the death toll across Europe has moved closer to 100. Late last night, officials in Washington State confirmed what many probably already suspected: 4 of the six deceased were either patients or staff at a nursing home in Kirkland, suburban Seattle.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Yesterday, the Dow posted its biggest one-day rebound in points as an endless parade of strategists and talking heads on CNBC jawboned hopes of ‘coordinated central-bank intervention’ into reality, though in the hours since Monday’s close, though hopes have dimmed somewhat, thanks in part to this Reuters report. As G7 finance minister and central bankers prepare for Tuesday morning’s conference call, it seems traders around the world have suddenly remembered that there’s not much central banks can do, even after the OECD called for a mix of monetary and fiscal stimulus to rescue global growth.

    In the span of days, the number of confirmed coronavirus cases in the US has climbed to more than 100 across 15 states if we include the evacuees, along with six deaths so far. the White House, and other governments, are shifting their focus, according to the New York Times, to distributing tests and focusing on early identification and containment instead of trying to keep the virus out.

    This comes as the number of cases worldwide surpassed 90,000 on Tuesday.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    In China, Communist Party officials are luxuriating in their success, or at least a convincing image of success, in suppressing the outbreak: Now that the novel coronavirus appears to be on the decline, vindicating Beijing’s heavy handed tactics (for weeks, 760 million were subjected to some form of restriction on their movements, while 100 million faced punishment for leaving their homes without permission).

    On Tuesday, Shanghai and Beijing instituted ‘travel bans’ directed at travelers from hot zones including Italy, South Korea and – of course – the US, turning President Trump’s ‘racist’ travel restrictions on their head. Here’s more from the NYT:

    Major cities across China have announced new travel restrictions on people who have recently visited countries where coronavirus infections are on the rise.

    On Tuesday, the authorities in Shanghai said that all travelers entering the city who had visited countries with significant outbreaks within the last two weeks must undergo a 14-day quarantine at home or at an approved isolation center. Officials in Guangdong Province announced similar measures, the state news media reported on Tuesday.

    And a city official in Beijing announced on Tuesday that all arrivals into the capital from countries struggling with outbreaks — including Iran, Italy, Japan and South Korea — would be subject to a 14-day quarantine.

    At least 13 people in China were found to be infected with the coronavirus after returning from countries such as Iran and Italy, two places that have seen some of the most severe outbreaks outside of Asia in recent days, according to the authorities.

    A 31-year-old Chinese woman had worked in a restaurant in the Italian city of Bergamo before returning home to Qingtian County, in the southeastern province of Zhejiang, where she tested positive for the virus. Seven more people who worked at the same restaurant in Bergamo were later found to be infected after they returned to Zhejiang, the local authorities said.

    In recent days, county officials in Qingtian have urged overseas residents to reconsider any plans to return home, citing the challenges they could pose to China’s efforts to control the epidemic.

    Minutes ago, South Korean health officials released their second coronavirus update for Tuesday: Another 974 confirmed cases raised the country’s total to 5,186. Meanwhile, South Korea’s death toll climbed to 34.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Public fury in SK so far has been directed at a strange, cult-like church called Shincheonji. Its leader issued an apology yesterday following reports that public prosecutors were being pressed to charge him and 11 other church leaders with murder. Now, investigators are looking into two church members who traveled to South Korea in January from Wuhan. One of them have tested positive, while the other tested negative, according to CNN.

    In Japan, another case was reported in Tokyo Tuesday, along with two additional cases in Osaka, and six cases between Nagoya and Kyoto.

    Over in Europe, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson said “we are ready for potential economic downside” as the UK faces a “national challenge” in defeating the virus.

    Johnson added: “I am very confident that Britain will get through it in good shape.”

    Asked about school closures, Johnson said “we don’t think schools should be closing in principle – they should stay open,” he said. But the public must follow the advice of Public Health England. However, given that children are actually considered “low risk” for COVID-19, Johnson said school closures might not fit into the government’s strategy. On Tuesday, cases in the UK climbed to 40.

    In France, the increasingly unpopular “President for the Rich” Emmanuel Macron has become the latest victim of coronavirus rumors, after the president reportedly caught a cold and tried to pull out of an event. He has now reportedly been cajoled into visiting a hospital ward in Paris to try and dispel rumors that he’s dying of pneumonia.

    In Iran, where the virus has killed at least 77 people (and more than 200 according to some reports), public health officials (at least those who haven’t already succumbed to the virus) confirmed that 2,336 cases have been counted. As case totals in Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Qatar, Oman, the UAE and Egypt climb, Iran’s regional neighbors have shut their borders and severed travel and trade links with the Islamic Republic. The head of Iran’s emergency medical services has become at least the fifth senior government official to be diagnosed with the virus after a senior advisor to the Ayatollah died yesterday. Additionally, 23 Iranian MPs were among the new cases on Tuesday.

    As more companies restrict employee travel, Google on Tuesday told the bulk of staff at its European headquarters in Dublin have been asked to work from home after a staffer reportedly caught the flu.

    As more countries cancelled cultural and sporting events across Europe, the head of European football’s government body said Tuesday that the Euro 2020 soccer tournament would move ahead as planned.

    “You don’t know how many concerns we have when we organize a big competition […] We have security concerns, we have political instability concerns and one of those concerns is the virus. We are dealing with it and we are confident that we can deal with it,” said UEFA President Aleksander Čeferin at a presser in Amsterdam.

    As the total number of cases in Spain climbs to 129, a person in Gibraltar has tested positive, the first case identified in the British territory on the southern coast of Spain.

    Thailand has imposed compulsory self-quarantine on travelers arriving from hot zones in Asia, the Middle East and Europe following a spate of deaths in the country.

    But now that the G7 communique has dashed the market’s hopes, get ready for another wild day.


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 18:48

Digest powered by RSS Digest

Today’s News 3rd March 2020

  • Macau Gaming Revenue Collapses 87.8% In February
    Macau Gaming Revenue Collapses 87.8% In February

    Just as we saw happen with auto sales  in China, Macau’s gaming revenue collapsed in February as a result of China grinding to a halt while the entire country remains mostly in lockdown as a result of the coronavirus spread.

    Macau businesses closed for 15 days to help control the spread of the virus, but it cost them. Gross gaming revenue for February was just 3.1 billion patacas ($386.5 million), a 87.8% fall from 2019. Analysts were predicting the pain ahead of time, estimating for a median of a 90% drop, according to Bloomberg

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Macau, the world’s largest gambling hub, had its government suspend casino operations from February 5th to about February 19th. The epicenter was already dealing with falling revenue numbers from 2019 – and this closure just adds insult to injury. It was the longest closure on record, second only to a 33 hour shutdown that occurred as a result of a typhoon in 2018. 

    When business resumed around February 20th, foot traffic at casinos was still weak. China continued to halt visas to Macau and transportation remained restricted. 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Analysts continue to see the near-term outlook as “murky”. JP Morgan estimates a 24% decrease in gross gaming revenue for the year, based on a 70% drop in March and a 35% decline in the second quarter. 

    The same analysts said in a March 1 note: “We do not think COVID-19 will curb gamblers’ enthusiasm in a sustainable way, so its impact on the industry’s sustainable earnings power should be limited.”

    It continued: “Looking at the glass half-full, we feel it could have been worse given the extensive level of disruption suffered.”

    Yeah, good thinking. After all, revenues could have been down 100%.


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 01:00

  • Why The Coming Economic Collapse Will Not Be Caused By Covid-19
    Why The Coming Economic Collapse Will Not Be Caused By Covid-19

    Authored by Matthew Ehret via Off-Guardian.org,

    With last week’s collapse in the stock market, the internet has been set ablaze with discussion of a new crash looming on the horizon (even with today’s record-breaking point-gain in the Dow). The fact that such a chain reaction collapse was only kept at bay due to massive liquidity injections by the Federal Reserve’s overnight repo loans should not be ignored.

    These injections which began in September 2019, have grown to over $100 billion per night… all that to support the largest financial bubble in human history with global derivatives estimated at $1.2 quadrillion (20 times the global GDP!).

    Sadly economic illiteracy is so pervasive among today’s modern economists that the real reasons for this crisis have been entirely misdiagnosed with financial experts from CNN, to Forbes blaming the volatility on the spread of the Corona virus!

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    NOT THE CORONA VIRUS: THE REAL CAUSE OF THE ONCOMING FINANCIAL COLLAPSE.

    As refreshing as it is to hear candid criticisms of the system’s failure and even support for the restoration of Glass-Steagall bank separation from presidential candidates like Bernie Sanders, Tulsi Gabbard or even the lame Elisabeth Warren… we find that in each case, those candidates are on record supporting policies cooked up by the very same oligarchs they appear to despise in the form of the Green New Deal.

    In spite of what many of its progressive proponents would wish, such a global green reform would not only impose Malthusian depopulation upon nation states globally were it accepted, but would establish a the supranational authority of a technocratic managerial elite as enforcers of a “de-carbonization agenda”.

    Due to the rampant lack of comprehension of how this crisis was created such that such idiotic proposals as “green new deals” are now seriously being suggested as remedies to our current ills, a bit of history is in order.

    SOME NECESSARY BACKGROUND

    “The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization. We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths. The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit.”

    – Franklin Delano Roosevelt, first Inaugural Address 1933

    Knowing that the “money changers” had only been able to create the great bubbles of the 1920s via their access to the deposits of the commercial banks, Franklin Roosevelt made the core of his battle against the abuses of Wall Street centre around a 1933 legislation entitled “Glass-Steagall”, named after the two federally elected officials who led the reform with FDR.

    This was a bill which forced the absolute separation of productive from speculative banking, guaranteeing via the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) only those commercial banking assets associated with the productive economy, but forcing any speculative losses arising from investment banking to be suffered by the gambler. The striking success of this law inspired other countries around the world to establish similar bank separation.

    Alongside principles of capital budgeting, public credit, parity pricing and a commitment to scientific and technological development, a dynamic had been created that would express the greatest hope for the world, and the greatest fear for the financial empire occupying the City of London and Wall Street.

    The death of John F. Kennedy ushered in a new age of pessimism and cultural irrationalism from which our society has never recovered. The destruction of a long term vision as exemplified by the space program, the St. Lawrence Seaway and the New Deal projects had resulted in a tendency within the population to increasingly look upon present pleasures as the only reality, and future goods as the mystical expression of the sum of present pleasures.

    In this new philosophical setting, so alien in previous epochs, money was permitted to act as a power unto itself for short term gains instead of serving the investments into the real productive wealth of society. With this new paradigm shift into the “now”, a new economic model was adopted to replace the industrial economic model which had proven itself in the years preceding and following World War II.

    The name for this system was “post-industrial monetarism”. This would be a system ushered in by Richard Nixon’s announcement of the destruction of the fixed-exchange rate Bretton Woods system and its replacement by the “floating rate” system of post 1971 fame.

    During that same fateful year of 1971, another ominous event took place: the formation of the Rothschild Inter-Alpha Group of banks under the umbrella of the Royal Bank of Scotland, which today controls upwards of 70% of the global financial system.

    The stated intention of this Group would be found in the 1983 speech by Lord Jacob Rothschild:

    “two broad types of giant institutions, the worldwide financial service company and the international commercial bank with a global trading competence, may converge to form the ultimate, all-powerful, many-headed financial conglomerate.”

    This policy demanded the destruction of the sovereign nation-state system and the imposition of a new feudal structure of world governance through the age-old scheme of controlling the money system on the one side, and playing on the vices of credulous fools who, by allowing their nations to be ruled by the belief that hedonistic market forces govern the world, would seal their own children’s doom.

    All the while, geopolitical structures foreign to the United States constitutional traditions were imposed by nests of Oxford-trained Rhodes Scholars and Fabians who converted America into a global “dumb giant” enforcing a neo colonial program under a “Anglo-US Special Relationship”. The Dulles brothers, McGeorge Bundy, Kissinger, and Bush all represent names that advanced this British directed plan throughout the 20th century.

    LONDON’S ‘BIG BANG’

    The great “liberalization” of world commerce began with a series of waves through the 1970s, and moved into high gear with the interest rate hikes of Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker in 1980-82, the effects of which both annihilated much of the small and medium sized entrepreneurs, opened the speculative gates into the “Savings and Loan” debacle and also helped cartelize mineral, food, and financial institutions into ever greater behemoths.

    Volcker himself described this process as the “controlled disintegration of the US economy” upon becoming Fed Chairman in 1978. The raising of interest rates to 20-21% not only shut down the life blood of much of the US economic base, but also threw the third world into greater debt slavery, as nations now had to pay usurious interest on US loans.

    In 1986, the City of London announced the beginning of a new era of economic irrationalism with Margaret Thatcher’s “Big Bang” deregulation. This wave of liberalization took the world by storm as it swept aside the separation of commercial, deposit and investment banking which had been the post-world war cornerstone in ensuring that the will of private finance would never again hold more sway than the power of sovereign nation-states.

    After decades of chipping away at the structure of regulation that FDR’s bold intervention into history had built, the “Big Bang” set a precedent for similar financial de-regulation into the “Universal Banking” model in other parts of the western world.

    THE DERIVATIVE TIME BOMB IS SET

    In September 1987, the 20-year foray into speculation resulted in a 23% collapse of the Dow Jones on October 19, 1987. Within hours of this crash, international emergency meetings had been convened with former JP Morgan tool Alan Greenspan introducing a “solution” which would have the future echoes of hyperinflation and fascism written all over it.

    “Creative financial instruments” was the Orwellian name given to the new financial asset popularized by Greenspan, but otherwise known as “derivatives”.

    New supercomputing technologies were increasingly used in this new venture, not as the support for higher nation building practices, and space exploration programs as their NASA origins intended, but would rather become perverted to accommodate the creation of new complex formulas which could associate values to price differentials on securities and insured debts that could then be “hedged” on those very spot and futures markets made possible via the destruction of the Bretton Woods system in 1971.

    So while an exponentially self-generating monster was created that could end nowhere but in a meltdown, “market confidence” rallied back in force with the new flux of easy money. The physical potential to sustain human life continued to plummet.

    NAFTA, THE EURO AND THE END OF HISTORY

    It is no coincidence that within this period, another deadly treaty was passed called the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). With this Agreement made law, protective programs that had kept North American factories in the U.S and Canada were struck down, allowing for the export of the lifeblood of highly skilled industrial workforce to Mexico where skills were low, technologies lower, and salaries lower still.

    With a stripping of its productive assets, North America became increasingly reliant on exporting cheap resources and services for its means of existence.

    Again, the physically productive powers of society would collapse, yet monetary profits in the ephemeral “now” would skyrocket. This was replicated in Europe with the creation of the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 establishing the Euro by 1994 while the “liberalization” process of Perestroika replicated this agenda in the former Soviet Union. While some personalities gave this agenda the name “End of History” and others “the New World Order”, the effect was the same.

    Universal Banking, NAFTA, Euro integration and the creation of the derivative economy in a space of just several years would induce a cartelization of finance through newly legalized mergers and acquisitions at a rate never before seen. The multitude of financial institutions that had existed in the early 1980s were absorbed into each other at great speed through the 1990s in true “survival of the fittest” fashion. No matter what level of regulation were attempted under this new structure, the degree of conflict of interest, and private political power was uncontrollable, as evidenced in the United States, by the shutdown of any attempt by Securities and Exchange Commission head Brooksley Born to fight the derivative cancer at its early stages.

    By 1999 a politically castrated Bill Clinton found himself signing into law a treaty authored by then Treasury Secretary Larry Summers known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which would be the final nail in the coffin for the Glass-Steagall separation of commercial and investment banking in the United States.

    The new age of unregulated trading and creation of over-the-counter derivatives caused these strange financial instruments to grow from $60 trillion in 2000 to $600 trillion by 2008.

    THE 2000-2008 FRENZY

    With Glass-Steagall now removed, legitimate capital such as pension funds could be used to start a hedge to end all hedges. Billions were now poured into mortgage-backed securities (MBS), a market which had been artificially plunged to record-breaking interest rate lows of 1-2% for over a year by the US Federal Reserve making borrowing easy, and the returns on the investments into the MBSs obscene.

    The obscenity swelled as the values of the houses skyrocketed far beyond the real values to the tune of one hundred thousand dollar homes selling for 5-6 times that price within the span of several years.

    As long as no one assumed this growth was ab-normal, and the unpayable nature of the capital underlying the leveraged assets locked up in the now infamous “sub-primes” and other illegitimate debt obligations was ignored, then profits were supposed to just continue infinitely. Anyone who questioned this logic was considered a heretic by the latter-day priesthood.

    The stunning “success” of securitizing housing debts immediately induced a wave of sovereign wealth funds to come into prominence applying the same model that had been used in the case of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDO) to the debts of entire nations.

    The securitizing of bundled packages of sovereign debts that could then be infinitely leveraged on the de-regulated world markets would no longer be considered an act of national treason, but the key to easy money.

    CONCLUSION

    This is the system which died in 2008. Contrary to popular belief, nothing was actually resolved. For all the talk of an “FDR revival” under Obama, speculation wasn’t actually regulated under the Dodd-Frank Act or the Volker Rule of 2010. No productive credit was created to grow the real economy under a national mission as was the case in 1933-1938.

    Banks were not broken up while derivatives GREW by 40% with the new bubble concentrated in the corporate/household debt sector now collapsing. During this time, nation states continued to be stripped, as austerity was rammed down the throats of nations.

    It should be no surprise that in the midst of this despair, a creative alliance was consolidated in defense of the interests of sovereign nation states and humanity at large led by the leadership of Russia and China.

    This leadership took the form of the China-led Belt and Road Initiative which has grown to embrace over 130 countries today and looking more and more like an Asian-led version of the New Deal of the 1930s.

    Indeed, China’s capacity to unleash long term credit for thousands of international long term infrastructure projects was made possible by the fact that it was the only country on the globe which had not given up the principles of bank separation which were destroyed in every other nation.

    Very few western figures stood up to this self-induced destruction over the decades, but one notable exception here worth mentioning is the figure of the late American economist Lyndon LaRouche (1922-2019) who not only resisted this process for over four decades, but fought alongside the Schiller Institute to promote New Silk Road as early as 1996.

    With the 2016 Brexit and election of President Trump, a new wave of nationalist spirit has become a fire which the technocrats have lost their capacity to snuff out.

    Increasingly, the idea that nation-states have a power over the private banking system has become revived and discussion for reforming the now dead Trans-Atlantic system is increasingly shaped not by the calls for a “New World Order” as Sir Kissinger would have liked, but rather for a New Silk Road and a true New Deal.

    The Eurasian nations are already firmly committed to this new system, and if the west is to qualify morally to take part in this new epoch, then the first step will be a return to a Glass-Steagall.


    Tyler Durden

    Tue, 03/03/2020 – 00:00

  • "It's Sad" – First Chinatowns, Now LA's Koreatown, 'Asianphobia' Crashes Food Sales Amid Coronavirus Fears
    “It’s Sad” – First Chinatowns, Now LA’s Koreatown, ‘Asianphobia’ Crashes Food Sales Amid Coronavirus Fears

    Pandemic fears grip the world as cases and deaths surge ex-China. Last month, we reported that Chinatowns around the globe were struck with a demand shock as consumers ditched Chinese restaurants for fear they could catch Covid-19. Eater LA says Los Angeles’ Koreatown has also seen plunging food sales as ‘Asianphobia’ rises with increasing virus cases in the US. 

    General Tso’s chicken has left a sour taste among consumers’ mouths as eating habits rapidly shift because of virus fear. From Australia to New York City to Toronto to England to San Francisco, Chinatowns around the world have had their food sales halved in the last month. Some restaurants warned if low traffic continues into the next quarter, their operations would have to be shuttered. 

    It’s not just Sinophobia that has consumers absolutely terrified that they could contract the virus if they are near a Chinese person, it’s now anyone who looks Asian, otherwise known as ‘Asianphobia.’ 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Eater LA notes that on Friday a KBS America’s news story on Tuesday detailed how a Korean Airlines flight attendant with symptoms of the virus recently visited LA’s Koreatown turned out to be entirely false. Though, in the wake of the story, food sales of restaurants in the Central LA neighborhood centered near Eighth Street and Irolo Street, west of MacArthur Park, plunged. 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    LA County Public Health Department stated in a presser on Thursday that no information suggests the flight attendant visited Koreatown. 

    Food sales at Han Bat Shul Lung Tang were halved last week because of the rumor. Hangari Kalguksu, a popular restaurant offering various noddle dishes, made a statement on Instagram that they hired a professional cleaning company to sanitize the restaurant, dismissing the virus rumor. 

    A trade group representing LA’s Koreatown restaurants said business conditions deteriorated last week on the rumor, contributed to a 50% decline in food sales. 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    “In the Korean American community here, it [the rumor] went like wildfire,” Alex Won told AP News on Friday as he chowed down on a bowl of beef brisket soup at Han Bat Shul Lung Tang. “It’s sad.”

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Won said he’s never seen Han Bat Shul Lung Tang “this empty, “adding that “there are always people here.”

    AP News notes that their interactions with various shop owners in Koreatown said business died overnight because of the rumor. 

    “It’s a bad rumor, but people like bad rumors,” said Jay Choi, manager of Hanshin Pocha.

    The streets of Koreatown last week and this weekend had people wearing masks, out of fear the virus is stealthily spreading on the West Coast. 

    State Assemblyman Kansen Chu, D-San Jose, said Chinatowns had taken severe economic losses as a result of Sinophobia. Now it appears, Asianphobia has claimed its next victim: LA’s Koreatown. 

    If community spreading across the US erupts, could the virus lead a bust of Asian eateries?


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 23:40

  • The Threat Of Nuclear War Between US & Russia Is Now At Its Greatest Since 1983
    The Threat Of Nuclear War Between US & Russia Is Now At Its Greatest Since 1983

    Authored by Scott Ritter, op-ed via RT.com,

    When the Commander of NATO says he is a fan of flexible first strike at the same time that NATO is flexing its military muscle on Russia’s border, the risk of inadvertent nuclear war is real.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    US Air Force Gen. Tod D Wolters told the Senate this week he “is a fan of flexible first strike” regarding NATO’s nuclear weapons, thereby exposing the fatal fallacy of the alliance’s embrace of American nuclear deterrence policy.

    It was one of the most remarkable yet underreported exchanges in recent Senate history. Earlier this week, during the testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee of General Tod Wolters, the commander of US European Command and, concurrently, as the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe (SACEUR) also the military head of all NATO armed forces, General Wolters engaged in a short yet informative exchange with Senator Deb Fischer, a Republican from the state of Nebraska. 

    Following some initial questions and answers focused on the alignment of NATO’s military strategy with the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the US, which codified what Wolters called “the malign influence on behalf of Russia” toward European security, Senator Fischer asked about the growing recognition on the part of NATO of the important role of US nuclear deterrence in keeping the peace.

    “We all understand that our deterrent, the TRIAD, is the bedrock of the security of this country,” Fischer noted.

    “Can you tell us about what you are hearing…from our NATO partners about this deterrent?”

    Wolters responded by linking the deterrence provided to Europe by the US nuclear TRIAD with the peace enjoyed on the European continent over the past seven decades. Fischer asked if the US nuclear umbrella was “vital in the freedom of NATO members”; Wolters agreed.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Remarkably, Wolters linked the role of nuclear deterrence with the NATO missions in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere outside the European continent. NATO’s mission, he said, was to “proliferate deterrence to the max extent practical to achieve greater peace.”

    Then came the piece de resistance of the hearing.

    “What are your views, Sir,” Senator Fischer asked, “of adopting a so-called no-first-use policy. Do you believe that that would strengthen deterrence?”

    General Wolters’ response was straight to the point.

    “Senator, I’m a fan of flexible first use policy.”

    Under any circumstance, the public embrace of a “flexible first strike” policy regarding nuclear weapons employment by the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe should generate widespread attention. When seen in the context of the recent deployment by the US of a low-yield nuclear warhead on submarine-launched ballistic missiles carried onboard a Trident submarine, however, Wolters’ statement is downright explosive. Add to the mix the fact the US recently carried out a wargame where the US Secretary of Defense practiced the procedures for launching this very same “low yield” weapon against a Russian target during simulated combat between Russia and NATO in Europe, and the reaction should be off the charts. And yet there has been deafening silence from both the European and US press on this topic.

    There is, however, one party that paid attention to what General Wolters had to say–Russia. In a statement to the press on February 25–the same date as General Wolters’ testimony, Sergey Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister stated that “We note with concern that Washington’s new doctrinal guidelines considerably lower the threshold of nuclear weapons use.” Lavrov added that this doctrine had to be viewed in the light “of the persistent deployment of US nuclear weapons on the territory of some NATO allies and the continued practice of the so-called joint nuclear missions.”

    Rather than embracing a policy of “flexible first strike”, Lavrov suggested that the US work with Russia to re-confirm “the Gorbachev-Reagan formula, which says that there can be no winners in a nuclear war and it should never be unleashed.” This proposal was made 18 months ago, Lavrov noted, and yet the US has failed to respond.

    Complicating matters further are the ‘Defender 2020’ NATO military exercises underway in Europe, involving tens of thousands of US troops in one of the largest training operations since the end of the Cold War. The fact that these exercises are taking place at a time when the issue of US nuclear weapons and NATO’s doctrine regarding their employment against Russia is being actively tracked by senior Russian authorities only highlights the danger posed.

    On February 6, General Valery Gerasimov, the Russian Chief of Staff, met with General Wolters to discuss ‘Defender 2020’ and concurrent Russian military exercises to be held nearby to deconflict their respective operations and avoid any unforeseen incidents. This meeting, however, was held prior to the reports about a US/NATO nuclear wargame targeting Russian forces going public, and prior to General Wolters’ statement about “flexible first use” of NATO nuclear weapons.

    In light of these events, General Gerasimov met with French General Fançois Lecointre, the Chief of the Defense Staff, to express Russia’s concerns over NATO’s military moves near the Russian border, especially the Defender 2020 exercise which was, General Gerasimov noted, “held on the basis of anti-Russian scenarios and envisage training for offensive operations.”

    General Gerasimov’s concerns cannot be viewed in isolation, but rather must be considered in the overall historical context of NATO-Russian relations. Back in 1983, the then-Soviet Union was extremely concerned about a series of realistic NATO exercises, known as ‘Able Archer ‘83,’ which in many ways mimicked the modern-day Defender 2020 in both scope and scale. Like Defender 2020, Able Archer ‘83 saw the deployment of tens of thousands of US forces into Europe, where they assumed an offensive posture, before transitioning into a command post exercise involving the employment of NATO nuclear weapons against a Soviet target.

    So concerned was Moscow about these exercises, and the possibility that NATO might use them as a cover for an attack against Soviet forces in East Germany, that the Soviet nuclear forces were placed on high alert. Historians have since observed that the threat of nuclear war between the US and the USSR was at that time the highest it had been since the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962.

    US and NATO officials would do well to recall the danger to European and world security posed by the “Able Archer ‘83” exercise and the potential for Soviet miscalculations when assessing the concerns expressed by General Gerasimov today. The unprecedented concentration of offensive NATO military power on Russia’s border, coupled with the cavalier public embrace by General Wolters of a “flexible first strike” nuclear posture by NATO, has more than replicated the threat model presented by Able Archer ’83. In this context, it would not be a stretch to conclude that the threat of nuclear war between the US and Russia is the highest it has been since Able Archer ’83.


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 23:20

  • Here Are The 5 Richest Men Of The 20th Century
    Here Are The 5 Richest Men Of The 20th Century

    Nikolai Romanov. Muammar Ghaddafi. John Rockefeller…

    What do these three men have in common? As it turns out, they were all three recently included in a list of “Five Richest Men of the 20th Century” following a quick study by LearnBonds.com.

    The total list is as follows: 5) Ghaddafi, 4) Mir Osman Ali Khan, 3) Romanov, 2) John D Rockefeller, 1) Andrew Carnegie.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Their aggregate net worth, adjusted for inflation, would amount to $1.62 trillion in 2019 dollars. In 1913, that would have worked out to a fortune of $63 billion – an unimaginable sum at the time. To arrive at these numbers, LearnBonds used the CPI index.

    The valuation was arrived at by incorporating the consumer price index change over the years as provided by the Usinflationcalculator.com. To calculate 1913 wealth in US dollars the formula 2020 Price x (1913 CPI / 2020 CPI) was used.

    Historical records show that Andrew Carnegie, a Scottish-American industrialist, was the richest man in the world back in 1913. But if his wealth were adjusted into today’s dollars, he would still occupy the top spot with a net worth of $419.8 billion. His vast fortune was credited to his legendary decision to sell Carnegie Steel Company to JP Morgan for $480 million in 1901. From the sale, Carnegie also received $230 million in gold bonds. Carnegie left most of his estate to charity after his death in 1919.

    Since wealth inequality is such a big theme in this year’s presidential election (everybody who watched Wednesday’s debate probably remembers the drubbing Bloomberg took just for being a humble self-made billionaire), LearnBonds also thought it would be informative to compare the wealth of America’s ‘Robber Barons’ to their contemporary counterparts – the tech barons who dominate Silicon Valley and the American economy.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Though there’s little doubt that the wealth gap has grown since the financial crisis thanks, in large part, to the Fed’s monetary stimulus which heavily inflated asset prices from their post-crisis lows.

    But for everybody who complains about Jeff Bezos, just remember: wealth concentration still hasn’t reached ‘Gilded Age’ levels.


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 23:00

  • All Of A Sudden, People All Over America Are Prepping Like Crazy
    All Of A Sudden, People All Over America Are Prepping Like Crazy

    Authored by Michael Snyder via The Economic Collapse blog,

    I can’t remember a time when we have seen such widespread “panic buying” all over the nation.  Today I spoke with someone that just visited the closest Wal-Mart in this area, and I was told that there are empty shelves all over the store.  There are very few canned goods left, some of the most essential medications have been cleaned out, and there was nothing left in the long-term storable food section at all. 

    Of course similar things are being reported at major retail stores all across the United States.  All of a sudden, fear of COVID-19 has motivated thousands upon thousands of Americans to start prepping like crazy.  But most of the population is still not taking this crisis seriously enough. 

    As the number of confirmed cases all over the world continues to rise at an exponential rate, what are the stores going to look like when most of the country finally realizes that they should be prepping for an extended pandemic?

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Over the past several days, this coronavirus outbreak has escalated significantly.

    From Saturday to Sunday, the number of confirmed cases in Italy jumped by 50 percent

    Italy reported a 50% increase in coronavirus cases Sunday, as the US further restricted travel and the famed La Scala opera house closed.

    Italy’s Civil Protection Authority reported the country now has 1,694 confirmed coronavirus cases, up from 1,128 confirmed cases on Saturday. Thirty-four people have died.

    And in Germany, the number of confirmed cases actually doubled in just 24 hours.

    Here in the United States, confirmed cases are now popping up all over the nation, and we are being warned to brace for a “boom” of confirmed cases

    A “boom” of confirmed cases of the coronavirus that has now killed more than 3,000 people around the world — including two in the U.S. — could already be racing across America despite ramped-up efforts to contain the outbreak, experts say.

    The spread of the virus by “community transmissions” is an indication that we could indeed be looking at the tip of the iceberg,” Ogbonnaya Omenka, an assistant professor and public health specialist at Butler University’s College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, told USA TODAY on Sunday.

    Overall, the number of confirmed cases outside of China has more than tripled over the past week.  If we continue to see that sort of a growth rate, there will be more than a million confirmed cases outside of China just five weeks from now.

    I don’t think that it will happen that quickly, and let us pray that we don’t hit that number at all, but right now this outbreak is starting to spiral out of control.

    As fear of this virus rises, grocery stores from coast to coast are stocking up on essential supplies in an effort “to prevent shortages”

    Now grocers are working to prevent shortages and preparing for a spike in demand for disinfectants and long-lasting items such as pasta and canned food. Some are ramping up orders from suppliers.

    “This is like a natural disaster, but it’s an illness,” said Doug Baker, vice president of industry relations at FMI, a trade group for food retailers.

    In the short-term, hopefully things won’t be too bad.

    But without a doubt global supply chains are becoming extremely strained due to the widespread shutdowns inside of China, and that has led one analyst to predict “empty shelves in Target and Walmart as early as April”

    “Literally, empty shelves in Target and Walmart as early as April,” predicts David Iwinski, a local China business consultant who once ran a factory in China.

    Most retail stores are likely to have shortages because the coronavirus in China is hampering the manufacture of products shipped to America.

    If there are things that you need to go buy, you need to do it now, because thousands upon thousands of Americans are already storming the stores.

    In Los Angeles, a local Costco was quickly raided of the most essential supplies when the store opened on Saturday morning

    At a Costco Wholesale market in Los Angeles Saturday morning, a swarm of shoppers loaded up carts with essential items to prepare for a possible period of quarantine.

    According to the chain, water, paper towels and Clorox disinfecting wipes were the most in-demand products.

    And up in northern California, photos of completely empty shelves over the weekend were rapidly shared on social media

    On social media, residents further north shared shocking photos and videos from Costco centers in San Francisco.

    Shelves were depleted of tinned food, while some shoppers climbed up onto shelving in order to reach remaining supplies of rice.

    Of course the exact same thing is happening in other states as well.

    In Washington, one local resident claimed that “thousands of people” have been descending on the local Costco centers…

    I live in the epicenter of the coronavirus outbreak in Washington State. My advice for those elsewhere – go to Costco now. Thousands of people at local stores yesterday – not where you want to be if there is a virus spreading. Glad I went a week ago.

    And one video that has been very widely shared shows hundreds of people lined up at a Costco in Brooklyn before it even opened in the morning.

    Up to this point, only six people have died from the virus in the United States.

    So what will things look like if thousands of people start dying?

    Already, there is a worldwide shortage of protective face masks.  In fact, things have gotten so bad that Surgeon General Jerome Adams posted a tweet demanding that people stop buying them

    The surgeon general has a message for people who want to run out and stockpile masks to combat the coronavirus – don’t.

    “Seriously people – STOP BUYING MASKS!” Surgeon General Jerome Adams tweeted. “They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus, but if healthcare providers can’t get them to care for sick patients, it puts them and our communities at risk!”

    Personally, I don’t understand his logic.  If the masks are not effective, then why do healthcare providers need them?

    Yes, the masks have limited effectiveness against a virus that is so easy to catch.  But at least they are better than nothing.

    The time of “the perfect storm” is here, and this virus has the potential to greatly accelerate our problems.

    We still don’t know if this will be the great global pandemic that so many have warned about, but Bill Gates certainly seems to believe that this may be the “once-in-a-century pathogen we’ve been worried about”

    Billionaire and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates said the coronavirus that has killed at least 2,859 people and infected more than 83,700 globally may be the “once-in-a-century pathogen we’ve been worried about.”

    “I hope it’s not that bad, but we should assume it will be until we know otherwise,” Gates wrote in an article published Friday in The New England Journal of Medicine.

    Personally, I am still hoping that this outbreak will start to subside once warmer weather arrives.

    But so far nothing is slowing this virus down.  As I mentioned above, the total number of cases outside of China has more than tripled over the last seven days, and that is a huge red flag.

    If you need to get to the store, do it now.  Because at the rate that people are raiding the stores, there could soon be shortages of some of the most important supplies.


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 22:40

  • Fox News Crushes Prime-Time With Highest Ratings In 24-Year History 
    Fox News Crushes Prime-Time With Highest Ratings In 24-Year History 

    Fox News dominated the basic cable news industry in February, according to a new report, which specifies the conservative news network hit the highest ratings in its 24-year history.

    A meltdown of leftist cable news networks has allowed Fox News to obtain the highest ratings ever to become the most-watched channel in all of basic cable for the 44th consecutive month, reported Nielsen Media Research.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Fox averaged 3.53 million viewers, followed by MSNBC’s 1.78 million, and CNN’s 1.05 million for the month.

    Fox’s prime time hosts, Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, and Laura Ingraham, had the top shows in all of cable.

    Hannity had the most-watched show, finishing the month with about 4.3 million viewers, while Carlson was second with 4.115 million and Ingraham third with 3.6 million.

    Ingraham is the first woman in all of cable news to reach an average viewership of more than 3 million views on any given month.

    Coverage of President Trump’s State of the Union address on Feb 4 was impressive for Fox, averaged an audience of more than 11.6 million viewers.

    Fox had 13 of the highest-rated shows for the month in all of cable.

    Year-over-year trends show Fox’s viewership increased by 35% this month while CNN fell 3%, and MSNBC plunged 9%.

    The increase in viewership for Fox suggests more and more people are turning off liberal media and gravitating towards conservative networks. 

    Fox is dominating all of cable news as its primary left-leaning competitors are imploding.

    “CNN is suffering a credibility crisis as viewership is in a mass exodus, fleeing the fake news network to more conservative networks, such as Fox News. There appears to be no plan of action by CNN or liberal media to fix the hemorrhaging of viewership, indicating the trend will persist through 2020,” we noted several months ago.


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 22:20

  • This Video Shows How Far Those In Power Will Go To Maintain Control Of A Quarantine
    This Video Shows How Far Those In Power Will Go To Maintain Control Of A Quarantine

    Authored by J.G.Martinez G. via The Organic Prepper blog,

    In our modern world, information is power. We know all that. Whether if some information we find allows us to sleep at night, that´s a different question.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Technology has made readily available information we never thought could be possible. This has allowed the shaping of our society in ways we never imagined.

    Under severe circumstances, those in control will take extreme measures to keep it. This is, has been, and very likely will continue being a norm. Losing control is the worst nightmare for politicians. They know, that once public law enforcement organizations have been overrun, they will be targeted. Should they have their conscience clean, that wouldn´t happen. But in every society of the world, with the extremely few exceptions, the norm seems to be these politicians don´t have it so clean. Therefore, they will do whatever they have to do, to avoid losing their grip.

    How is China maintaining control?

    Now let´s analyze Chinese idiosyncrasy. Their culture has been going on for thousands of years. They are right to be proud. Whether that strange and modern concept of “human rights” was respected, it´s not part of the equation. Poor people had “human” rights thousands of years ago? I am not by any means an expert in history; but I would say, most of the actual “empires” are on a basis of total lack of respect for individual rights.

    How is it possible that 1.5 billion people are kept under control so they don´t take over the status quo? It´s a mystery for me. But the future is unpredictable and can be really surprising. Things can change. The only constant is change.

    We never can underestimate how far the system can go, just to avoid that huge beast called “the masses” getting out of control. This being said, I am going to describe what is in the videos of the link I submit here. This is my personal opinion, strictly. I´m totally responsible.

    Warning: The video has some strong violent scenes including female mistreating.

    Expect violent measures

    Never been in the military, but I know most of the uniformed forces all over the world some kind of protocol to counterattack every possible contingency. That is something great. Law-abiding citizens will applaud this. Including me of course. But things are different when the contingency is becoming increasingly…threatening.

    And this is exactly what seems to be happening. The reactions are extremely violent. The actions are extreme, and it´s hard to understand, if everything is under control, then why this footage is online? Despite all the censorship? These are the dystopian methods used by a desperate government.

    Remember, the doctor who first alerted about this outbreak was thrown in a corner to die. It was a plain death sentence. I don´t know in China, but in Venezuela, the time and effort needed to provide someone with the means to be a real, prepared and competent doctor in medicine (not like those posers in Cuba who just want to get off the island to ask for asylum and going to work in someone´s restaurant) is huge: 7 years, and 10 years with an specialty. This shameless contempt for human life, once the owner of such life decides to make a move against whatever affects the interests of the totalitarian regime in charge, is a trait that sooner or later will be the nemesis of such soulless machinery of propaganda, built to feed decadent bureaucrats. Those who have seen how creepy the uniformity of certain “party leadership” is, will understand perfectly what I intend to say.

    Maybe some of those watching this video could understand the methodology.

    I don´t, and please don´t ask me to do so.  They act so violently, for being authorities, that one could think they seem to be on the verge of collective hysteria.

    The video shows, in the first 20 seconds officers with masks dragging people out and immobilizing people on the floor. People are chased on the streets, by officers with sticks. Carried on hanging from legs and arms, by personnel with full-body hazmat suits.

    An “officer” hits with both fists several times to a woman. Obviously he loses it after the woman reacts badly to his requests, and he starts throwing fists like a little girl. Shame on him.

    Incredibly, a building gets its steel gates welded, shutting it closed for good. Officers in white hazmat suits barricade (on the outside!) a building gate. A pile of dirt and debris is found burying another gate. All of these buildings were suspicious of being infected with the disease.

    Officers are seen fighting over people on the floor. They even kick the faces of some citizens. I know people can be annoying, but these officers don´t act like they´re controlling a disease: they look like thugs mobbing someone. I mean, how much time a trained officer lasts getting someone handcuffed? Dragging people on the streets is their idea of “crisis management”?

    Another outrageous image is several people handcuffed, but chained by the waist to each other, just like circus monkeys. Jeez, I don´t even like monkeys being chained like that.

    Desperate authorities are dangerous

    Just to be clear, this is NOT a political article, God forbid it. This is a small exhibition of how the desperation of authorities can lead to very dangerous situations for us citizens. No matter where you are. Or even who you are.

    Just imagine why I´m so concerned. I´m a foreigner in this country. The only person I care about, and the reason I am here, is a kid. I don´t have a fridge. I have to eat outside, or open a can otherwise.

    Just think someday an outbreak makes its way here, and some sort of quarantine is enforced. What the heck am I going to do? Of course, I have some cans and water stored. A small couple of flashlights, and some other stuff. But I won´t be able to make it more than a week, and that is with luck.

    What would happen if I have to defy the quarantine, get out the 7 blocks to the next supermarket, to buy some food (if there even is food left)…and a bunch of police throws me in a patrol car with other (possibly infected) guys?

    If I never was exposed or contaminated, now I´m done. My only way to escape would be, to fight back (and with the risk they take my papers off me) and run. No one is going to get to look for me in any hospital or some other place. I would be on my own. (This book is an excellent guide to being prepared for quarantines so you can stay out of harm’s way.)

    This is starting to be a situation that has been slowly occupying spaces in my mind. After all, 5 years ago I was sitting in my living room, enjoying a cold beer while playing videogames with my kiddo and torturing my annoying neighbors with the full power of my home theater.

    5 months from here, God knows what will happen.

    Do you see why I´m so concerned about this stuff? It´s amazing this has not made viral yet. The rest of the world (especially some countries in Latin America) seems not to give a f*** about the virus.

    My brother-in-law is a really, really nice guy. I appreciate him a lot. I´m almost 20 years his senior but I see him as my (another) younger brother, indeed. He´s a simple man, a country boy now living in a huge city. Sent him the video and he said, immediately “Jose, this is serious. We will have to look for a place without so many people around! Your cottage would be the ideal place!! If you have some plan let me know.”

    Thanks for your reading, and I look forward to your comments.

    Be safe.


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 22:00

  • China Warns Of Looming "Locust Invasion" As Coronavirus Outbreak Fades
    China Warns Of Looming “Locust Invasion” As Coronavirus Outbreak Fades

    Is the world’s largest constitutionally atheist state facing a revival of the 10 biblical plagues of Egypt? It’s starting to look that way.

    Just days after Beijing promised to send a a 1,000-duck “army” to Pakistan to help farmers fend off one of the largest locust swarms in decades, senior government officials warned that China could soon face an “invasion” of desert locusts and urged local authorities to prepare for battle, even as the country struggles to get back on its feet after being shut down for so long.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The locusts are reportedly approaching China via Pakistan and India. Swarms could enter Tibet from Pakistan and India, or the southwestern province of Yunnan through Myanmar, depending on climate conditions, the notice said. Swarms could also fly across Kazakhstan and into China’s Xinjiang region, according to Reuters.

    To be sure, the National Forestry and Grassland Administrations said on its website that the risk of the swarm entering China and attacking farms is “low”. But if the swarms do arrive, Beijing will be limited by a paucity of knowledge about the locusts’ migratory patterns and techniques to fight them (aside from the ducks, apparently).

    Swarms could also attack the southwestern province of Yunnan via Myanmar. It all depends on climate conditions. Swarms could also fly across Kazakhstan and into China’s Xinjiang region.

    Chinese customs officials at Khunjerab, a crossing between China and Pakistan in southwestern Xinjiang, have started monitoring the surrounding 2 km for locusts. They inspect vehicles crossing the border and, if they find locusts or locust eggs hidden, they destroy them.

    The desert locusts have already ravaged crops and pastures in several countries in Africa, as well as India and Pakistan.

    Thankfully, as we mentioned above, Beijing has a secret weapon:


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 21:40

  • Google's Creepy Line Exposed
    Google’s Creepy Line Exposed

    Authored by M G via The Burning Platform blog,

    The Creepy Line is a particularly sinister term used in an unguarded remark by former Google CEO Eric Schmidt in 2010. In hindsight, what is most disturbing about the comment is how casually he explained Google’s policy regarding invading the privacy of its customers and clients.

    “Google policy on a lot of these things,” Schmidt says about 45 seconds into the introduction, “is to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it.” Time pointer needed.

    The Creepy Line is an 80-minute documentary available through several options available here

    For now, it is available for free at Amazon Prime, but I’m not sure how long it will be offered there considering many current concerns regarding censorship of anti-establishment themes on various social media platforms.

    This film offers a very frank look at the number one source of news in our country: Facebook and Google.

    Early in the film, you will discover how Google acquired an enormous and permanent cache of data about users. Initially, the data was used to refine search algorithms used to help index the websites and information uploaded to the world wide web. Now, however, it is used to fine-tune ads and content that most suits your interests, storing the information to better provide content suggestions for you. But, this film will give you a really disquieting idea (at least it should) about what else they may be doing with that data.

    Initially, Google was simply the most popular Search engine, basically the largest available “indexing” algorithm on the net. Then, Google came up with Google Chrome, a browser, to track and log not only what you look for but also where you go and every keystroke you make while there. In fact, Google realized they could serve you best if they know what you are doing even when offline, which is why the the Android system can track you everywhere you take your phone. With all the free apps available and used globally, Google has a very accurate picture of what everyone’s daily life looks like anywhere in the world.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    At intervals during the presentation, Professor Jordan Peterson offers insight from his own experience with social media and agenda setting.  For those unfamiliar with Peterson, he was propelled into fame when he very publicly refused to use the new gender pronouns approved by Canada’s Political Correct Policy. Peterson’s outspoken refusal to yield to the thought police led to him being interviewed as being a spokesman for the Millennial Mindset, especially their willingness to accept new technology without questioning it.

    “These are all free services but obviously they’re not,” notes Peterson, during his commentary, as he discusses the impact upon his life his sudden notoriety and the negative publicity Google and You Tube caused for him. He discusses his own battle with depression as well as insights into his daughter’s experiences with social media, which gives him special psychiatric insight into teenage (millennial) angst, perhaps.  Some may find his frank openness about the issues off-putting, but he comes across to me as a man who has walked through hell and doesn’t want to talk about it, but has decided he will do so, if you are interested. I find Peterson’s point of view extremely relevant, especially in light of the the news regarding Peak Prosperity’s de-platforming today and the implications for our own sources of information going forward.

    He is not the main speaker during the film, but Peterson does an excellent job explaining how the surveillance business model works.  This leads to a discussion of how Google Maps, Google Docs, and the use of Gmail (even drafts of emails you don’t send!) combine together to form and shape your thoughts and behavior, similar to a bunch of people in a control room with dials which monitor and control your every interaction with the world. (15:28)

    Less than ten minutes into the movie, you might have already decided to turn to non-Google search engines, but there is no hope of your retrieving any information they already have on you. It belongs to them, a legal point discussed several times during the presentation.

    We already know Facebook censors conservative views and downplays trending stories favorable to conservatives, and the movie assures us Google and You Tube work on similar algorithms. Algorithmic choices must be based on something, but to remain supposedly objective, nothing should be completely filtered out, only put into some sort of rational order. Rational could be chronological, or most viewed, or relevant, for instance, but for that rational variable in the algorithm, something will come first.

    As long as nothing is excluded, albeit, as long as you can find them on the list somewhere, there is at least a rational reason for their placement and the semblance of objectivity is retained.  Whether you agree with the rationality is not relevant at this point.  Except, that we know filters are restricting information for very irrational reasons.

    In the discussion, we discover Facebook Social Engineers insert stories into news feeds which they want people to see. This means not only is Facebook a gatekeeper for your news, they are also propaganda pushers. The concerns that Facebook could easily influence elections by sending messages to certain types of individuals most likely to be influenced deserves at least some discussion by some governmental agency, doesn’t it?

    Well? the discussion with Zuckerberg during the film shows his disregard for users’ privacy concerns.  That CYA attitude is obvious throughout when we are reminded of all the “terms of use” we have agreed to over the years.

    Facebook and these other internet entities claiming company rights without accountability are communities without voting citizens. Since the majority of voters claim to get their news from Facebook or Google associated sources, this is an issue people should realize really will impact our ability to use social media for reliable news.  We have no access to details concerning how decisions are made regarding censorship on any of these platforms.  We have every reason to believe they are not necessarily rational or definitely are not ethical. While Facebook seemed at one time to be a wonderful way to connect humanity across the world, it brought with that connection an overabundance of unintended consequences which may introduce a new Dark Age.

    Google and Facebook are a kind of corporate partnership which has unprecedented power and influence over public opinion. Psychologist and Google critic Robert Epstein (a large contributor to the documentary) found that, by sheer coincidence, the day after he wrote an article called “Could Google Tilt a Close Election?” he couldn’t access the Internet through any browser. If you are time-constrained and hope for the meat of the matter, around the 34-minute point, Peterson discusses his reaction to Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt’s comment about getting close to the creepy line but not crossing it.  He suggests cultures once taught children to stay away from the creepy line, but that somehow, digital capability has altered the understanding of what the creepy line represents.

    The movie discusses the concepts behind Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME) which has powerful implications since 90% of searchers select the first on the list. At 38:30 a good introduction to the impact of Negativity Bias helps explain the ability to suppress ideas deemed “negative” in public opinion.

    “If they have this kind of power then democracy is an illusion,” says Roger Epstein.

    “There have to be in place numerous safeguards to make sure not only that they don’t exercise these powers but that they can’t exercise these powers.” 

    At 44:28, you will discover that the Federal Government runs on Google and when you learn how much of our nations classified data is trusted to Google, it should make most of us even more aware of our lapses in internet discernment in days gone by.

    I believe, it is vital to note the film was made by the makers of “Clinton Cash.”

    And Google executive Eric Schmidt, infamous for his “creepy line” comment, became part of the Clinton campaign in 2016 but by then, we’d all come to realize there was something a little creepy about Google, anyway, hadn’t we? While the video does provide a lot of anecdotal evidence with some scientific (social statistics) analysis to support the idea that internet gatekeepers introduce liberal bias, the evidence is sketchy about how internet platforms are monetized and what we might do to resist the influence these tech giants possess in our government institutions.

    This is a discussion  we should force our federal servants to have because those agencies have become part of the hiring grounds for big tech companies.  They simply hire influence.  It is a discussion we do need to have as we face the direction technology is pushing us toward: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Artificially Intelligent Decisions.

    Instead of War Games’ discovery there is no way to win, AI may decide nobody really has a need to know who won. Google got caught before favoring its own commercial services by antitrust regulators, which is discussed in the movie. Assuming those who control Google might very well show favor in politics is a valid worry when considering the ability of many of their hired “monitors” to delete or insert content based on their own bias at will. (The video discusses several known instances of this happening.)

    Unfortunately, there is not an obvious solution, but one suggestion is that Google, Facebook, YouTube, et al be legally defined as media companies and be subject to the same legal burdens which apply to mainstream media corporations. In other words, the suggestion is that they be held accountable for their actions. These enormous companies have created algorithms that in turn have created sorting systems that attempt to direct and control (quite successfully) every aspect of our lives, without our even being fully aware of their impact on our decisions.

    It is time we educate ourselves before we become “re-educated.”

    Overall, I think The Creepy Line is a good way to begin a much needed public debate, but it is at least a way to get yourself educated a bit about why you should send a donation to The Burning Platform today and thank Jim Quinn for continuing to host a wide variety of contributors here at this page while he can.


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 21:20

  • Boeing Bets Big On Max Production Restart By Mid-Year With New Hires
    Boeing Bets Big On Max Production Restart By Mid-Year With New Hires

    Boeing is making a massive bet with the hiring of new mechanics for its shuttered 737 Max production line that a restart could begin imminently, reported Bloomberg

    Max production lines were suspended last month as there was no clear pathway for the planes to return to the skies via the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

    Boeing started hiring hundreds of new employees late last year with the expectation production would resume by mid-2020. In early December, Boeing hired 115 new mechanics to its Pacific Northwest manufacturing hub. Another 122 were brought on in early January and another 143 by mid-month. IAM District 751, Boeing’s largest labor union, said the plane manufacturer had hired 730 new workers, a figure that is entirely net increases, despite 31 mechanics leaving. 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Boeing’s labor and supply chain management expenses related to the Max have been soaring since the planes were grounded about a year ago, and the company incurred even higher costs associated with production shutdowns last month. About 3,000 employees remain on payroll to avoid a fracturing of its supply chain. 

    Boeing’s timetable for a mid-year production restart could be a little too optimistic with planes grounded. The FAA has provided limited details on when the aircraft will return to the skies. 

    There are some signs that Boeing’s restart could be nearing, or maybe it’s just more gambling by its suppliers: Spirit AeroSystems Holdings Inc., Boeing’s top supplier with 3,200 employees, said it would resume Max fuselage production at the end of March.

    Ken Herbert, an analyst with Canaccord Genuity, said 200 of the recent Boeing hiring’s had been mechanics for the Max production line. Herbert said other workers had been shifted to other product lines but would be diverted back to Max production when restart occurs.

    Doug Alder, a Boeing spokesman, told Bloomberg that “we’ve maintained our staffing levels on the 737 program to focus on factory initiatives, while temporarily assigning some employees.” 

    Getting Max production off the ground by mid-year could be a difficult task for Boeing, and the number of resources it’s allocating into its supply chain for immediate restart could prove disastrous if delays continue.

    Hints of new delays are coming from Southwest and United Airlines, who have extended Max cancelations until late August to the early September timeframe.

    And more issues are developing, with about half of undelivered Max planes have foreign-object debris (FOD) in their fuel tanks.

    Boeing’s big bet on mid-year production restart could prove disastrous if more delays are seen. 


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 21:00

  • Is China's Economy Finally Starting To Recover? Here Is What The Real Data Shows
    Is China’s Economy Finally Starting To Recover? Here Is What The Real Data Shows

    Over the weekend, China-watchers – or at least the ones who don’t really watch China all that closely and instead rely on others’ “hot takes” – were shocked to learn that in February both the Chinese manufacturing and non-manufacturing PMIs had crashed far below consensus expectations, tumbling to record low levels, surpassing even the economic contraction observed at the peak of the global financial crisis.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Meanwhile, anyone who was following out periodic updates of China’s “alternative”, high-frequency indicators demonstrating the real state of the economy was hardly surprised, because as we showed over the past few weeks, after China’s catastrophic post-Lunar New Year collapse the economy has yet to stage a material rebound as profiled previously:

    And yet, judging by the market’s torrid surge on Monday, it appears that – as so often happens – traders took China’s latest numbers in stride, and specifically as an indication of Beijing “kitchen sinking” the collapse in February, with a V-shaped recovery sure to follow.

    Or maybe not, because while not only has China’s economy not picked up even modestly, but it is only a matter of time before Beijing, which has forced people to go to work against their will, succumbs to a second wave of coronavirus infections, one which will result in an even worse economic slump than the current one, which incidentally has yet to show any actual recovery!

    So what do the latest high-frequency economic indicators show? It may come as a surprise to some that not only has China’s economy barely posted any improvement since our last update on this topic a week ago, but it has in fact lost ground in some metrics. Courtesy of Goldman, here is the latest “alternative” data:

    First, daily coal consumption has barely rebounded from the recent lows, and is in fact where it was when the Lunar Near Year started, and tracking almost 30% Y/Y:

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    In line with the reduced daily coal consumption, railway-loaded coal volumes are also tracking substantially below the average level of the past three years, and what’s worse, the 2020 series appears to have slowed down in recent days.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    An even more ominous indicator is China’s traffic congection index – a proxy of overall trade and commerce – which has barely budged since its new year lows and remains far below the same period in previous years.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    With commerce frozen and amid fears that the government is lying about the true extent of the coronavirus spread, it will hardly come as a surprise that passenger traffic has failed to stage even a modest rebound from its new year lows, and is about a quarter of where it was one year.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    One of Wall Street’s favorite real-time indicators, traffic congestion in major Chinese cities, has seen a modest rebound in recent days, however even it remains just barely above its level at the start of the lunar new year, and is below half where it has been in recent years.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    It’s not just passenger traffic that is moribund: the load factor on domestic flights remains a fraction of where it has been in recent years.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Even the one area where there was been a modest rebound in recent days, daily property sale, remains in dire territory, or about 68% down compare to last year.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Looking at end markets for commodities used in construction, the operating rate of rebar  slumped further on both weak demand and high inventories. Likewise, the operating rate of HRC and galvanized steel, mainly used in the manufacturing sector, is now at just 50% of capacity and shows no signs of recovery.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    And, as Goldman points out, while the bank has found increased orders from cable and wires fabricators while, operating rate of copper rod producers remained as low as 50% for big companies and 30% for medium-sized producers. What’s more, some small producers have not restarted yet at all, according to a Goldman survey with onshore contacts.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    There is a silver lining to China’s ongoing economic paralysis: anyone who ventures into one of the country’s thousands of cinemas will have the building all to themselves.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The failure of China’s economy to reboot comes even as authorities have ordered owners of closed factories – whose employees are scared to return to work – to boost electricity usage to pretend that the economy is back to normal, and to fool those people who look at the charts above, into getting the impression that China’s economy is humming again. We described this bizarre example of central planning on Saturday, and here is Rabobank’s Michael Every commenting on this very phenomenon on Monday morning:

    Saturday’s China PMI data were frankly shocking. Manufacturing was at 35.7 and services at 28.9: these are not recessionary levels, but outright depressionary. The private Caixin PMI was also awful at 40.3, again saying a deep downturn is biting. Of course, the real issue is if we get a V-shaped recovery in output – or in virus infections. Optimists, and Chinese stocks this morning, are cheering the former – and Chinese stocks are always freely traded and never, ever manipulated by the authorities, as well all know. Realists, and NASA satellite imagery of no pollution over China, lean towards the latter: as does one anecdotal, unsubstantiated report trending over the weekend that China has been ordering factories to leave the lights on to make them look busier from space and to boost electricity output in case pesky foreigners start trying to use that as a GDP proxy.

    Finally, for all those expecting that Beijing will unleash another massive stimulus to kick-start the economy which remains paralyzed at a time when most analysts said activity would be back to normal by the first week of March, we give the last word to Nomura’s China economist Ting Lu, who not only correctly predicted the plunge in PMIs, but also said that “the likelihood of another round of massive stimulus appears low as policy space remains limited.””

    “We believe markets might underestimate the scale of the current growth slump. Due to a slower-than-expected rate of business resumption, we have cut our year-on-year Q1 real GDP growth forecast to 3.0% and expect Beijing to ramp up policy easing measures in coming months. That said, the likelihood of another round of massive stimulus appears low as policy space remains limited.

    In short, for China – which was the world’s growth dynamo during the global financial crisis and helped the world rebound from the 2009 global depression while raking up tens of trillions in debt – the end of the economic road may finally be here.


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 20:40

  • Forced Labor? – China Pushes 1000s Of Uyghur Muslims To Work In Factories
    Forced Labor? – China Pushes 1000s Of Uyghur Muslims To Work In Factories

    The Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) published a new report that says at least 27 factories in nine Chinese provinces are using forced labor of at least 80,000 Muslim Uyghur minority from the western Xinjiang autonomous region. 

    Under conditions that strongly suggest forced labour, Uyghurs are working in factories that are in the supply chains of at least 83 well-known global brands in the technology, clothing and automotive sectors, including Apple, BMW, Gap, Huawei, Nike, Samsung, Sony, and Volkswagen,” ASPI’s report said.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    After several years of intense international criticism of China’s Uyghur re-education camps of more than one million people, many of these folks have graduated and been funneled into government-directed factories around the country. 

    The report said, “It is extremely difficult for Uyghurs to refuse or escape these work assignments, which are enmeshed with the apparatus of detention and political indoctrination both inside and outside of Xinjiang. In addition to constant surveillance, the threat of arbitrary detention hangs over minority citizens who refuse their government-sponsored work assignments.” 

    It added that “local governments and private brokers are paid a price per head” by the Xinjiang provincial government to “organise the labour assignments,” which ASPI says a new phase of government “repression” of Uyghurs is underway in forced labor factories making products for Western consumers. 

    The Shandong-based Taekwang factory is one of many factories Uyghurs have been forced into labor. Taekwang is owned by South Korean chemical and textile conglomerate (chaebol), is one of the largest manufacturers of shoes for Nike, turning out upwards of eight million pairs per year. 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    ASPI said hundreds of Uyghurs workers did not choose to work at the factory; they were assigned by the government. 

    “The Chinese government is now exporting the punitive culture and ethos of Xinjiang’s ‘re-education camps’ to factories across China,” said Vicky Xiuzhong Xu, the report’s lead author.

    It was seen in some cases that Uyghurs were transferred from re-education camps directly to factories. 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

     “For the Chinese state, the goal is to ‘sinicise’ the Uyghurs; for local governments, private brokers and factories, they get a sum of money per head in these labour transfers,” Xu added.

    And while the appeal of cheap slave labor is enticing for Western companies, the Chinese government promotes Uyghurs integration in factories as their strong efforts at ‘multicultralism’…

     “By ‘encouraging’ ethnic minorities in Xinjiang to ‘interact and develop themselves,'” Wang Yang, an official in charge of Xinjiang labor policies, recently said. “China has immensely promoted interaction and integration among different ethnicities.”

    As China attempts to restart its manufacturing base, specifically in the Hubei region, where shortages of workers remain because of the virus outbreak, it’s only a matter of time before the government sends in Uyghurs to pick up the broken pieces. 


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 20:20

  • Did CDC Stop Disclosing How Many Americans Are Being Tested For Covid-19? – Live Updates
    Did CDC Stop Disclosing How Many Americans Are Being Tested For Covid-19? – Live Updates

    Summary:

    • US death toll climbs to 6; all in WA, which has 18 cases
    • 2 new cases confirmed in Tampa Bay
    • 1st case reported in New Hampshire
    • Hubei reports 114 new cases, 31 new deaths
    • South Korea case total hits 4,812 as nearly 500 new cases reported; death toll hits 34
    • Santa Clara County confirms 2 more cases, bringing county total to 9
    • Gottlieb warns US cases likely in ‘low thousands’
    • Illinois announces 4th case
    • Boris Johnson: “A very significant expansion” of the virus is “clearly in the cards”
    • Italian death toll climbs 18 to 52 while total cases surpasses 2,000
    • BMW tells 150 to quarantine after Munich employee infected
    • Algeria total hits 5
    • Senegal becomes 2nd sub-Saharan country to confirm virus
    • WHO’s Tedros: Virus is “common enemy” of humanity so don’t focus on blame
    • Jordan reports first two cases
    • French death toll revised to 3, total cases climb to 191
    • Tunisia reports first case
    • UK total climbs to 40
    • OECD warns global growth could fall by half
    • Indonesia reports first cases
    • “Progress is being made” toward a vaccine
    • Cuomo says NY expects more cases
    • India confirms 2 more cases
    • ‘Official’ Iran death toll hits 66
    • EU confirms 38 deaths across 18 members
    • First cases confirmed in Fla.
    • 2 Amazon employees test positive in Milan
    • Virus now in 8 US states: Washington, California, Illinois, Rhode Island, New York, Florida, Oregon and New Hampshire
    • San Antonio virus patient re-hospitalized after testing positive
    • China warns it could face ‘locust invasion’

    * * *

    Update (2015ET): Health officials in South Korea have reported the first batch of numbers for Tuesday: 477 new cases, bringing the total to 4,812.

    Three more deaths in South Korea, bringing death total to 34 in South Korea, still behind Italy’s 52.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    *  *  *

    Update (1920ET): Hubei has reported 114 newly confirmed cases of the virus, along with 31 new deaths, the Global Times reports. That’s the lowest daily case total since Jan. 21, as Beijing tries to convince its citizens now that they’ve returned to work that everything is all right and there’s no need to fear the virus anymore.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Outside of Hubei, officials reported just 11 additional cases, and no deaths.

    Glancing through the Global Times twitter feed is an always-rewarding activity, and on Monday evening, we noticed this gem: the GT reports that South Korea is struggling to contain the outbreak because of “high levels of religious fanaticism” in the country.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    * * *

    Update (1850ET): Washington Governor and former Democratic presidential candidate Jay Inslee said Monday that Washingtonians shouldn’t be surprised when authorities start cancelling “big public events” – though he assured the public that he wasn’t requesting a mass cancellation right now(despite the fact that 6 people are dead in his state).

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    * * *

    Update (1845ET): UK PM Boris Johnson is reportedly planning to unveil a “plan” to help combat the outbreak in Britain as the total number of cases nears 30, amid signs of ‘community transmission’ inside its borders.

    * * *

    Update (1805ET): During VP Pence’s virus press conference, FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn confirmed that the US will be able to perform around 1 million tests by the end of the week. What this means is simple – more tests, more positives. And we wonder – absent G& actual action, not just talk – if this will take the shine back off stocks.

    However, there is one more concerning thing as US authorities appear to take a page out of communist China’s authoritarian playbook.  As Jedd Kegum noted on Twitter, the CDC has stopped disclosing the number of Americans tested for coronavirus.

    On the left is how the website looked last night. On the right is what it looks like now, with the testing info removed.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Coming right as CDC says it will be massively expanding testing, Legum warns: “The lack of testing is a scandal…This is the coverup.”

    *  *  *

    Update (1550ET): State officials announced the first case of coronavirus in New Hampshire Monday, according to a local TV station.

    Dr. Benjamin Chan, a New Hampshire state epidemiologist, said during a press conference that one of four people reently tested for coronavirus came back positive. The individual had recently traveled to Italy.

    The individual is an adult from Grafton County in the northwestern part of the state. They are not sick enough to be hospitalized, but have been asked to self-quarantine at home. The person is reportedly an employee of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. The hospital has reportedly set up an incident command center.

    “We will be working very closely with healthcare providers in the community and the hospital system involved in order to investigate this case of COVID-19 and try and prevent further transmission in our community,” Chan said.

    Health officials in the state said they have no reason to suspect a community outbreak since the history of transmission is clear.

    “We will be working tirelessly to investigate this most recent identification and to identify any potential susceptible contacts who may need themselves to be placed under self quarantine,” Chan said.

    In an interview that will air tonight, Dr. Anthony Fauci of the CDC said the outbreak in the US has “reached outbreak proportions and likely pandemic proportions.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Eight US states have no confirmed cases of the coronavirus: Washington, California, Illinois, Rhode Island, New York, Florida, Oregon and New Hampshire

    During a short, impromptu briefing with reporters after his meeting with drug company CEOs at the White House on Wednesday, Trump hinted at tightening travel restrictions, something critics have been demanding.

    In other news, critics slammed VP Mike Pence after the CDC abruptly delayed a Monday briefing.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    * * *

    Update (1540ET): Now that France’s confirmed cases have more than doubled over the past two days, French drug giant Sanofi said it is producing an experimental lot of the vaccine. We assume the experimental doses will be distributed to the most in-need patients.

    * * *

    Update (1455ET): In his latest comment of the day, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson said “we are ready for potential economic downsides from coronavirus”.

    Most of Google’s 8,000 employees and contractors in Ireland have been told to work from home tomorrow after a member of staff reported flu-like symptoms.

    * * *

    Update (1440ET): The US death toll is now changing by the minute.

    Washington State authorities are now saying six patients have died from the virus (presumably all of them were elderly or sick, as the first patients who died were), and the total number of patients in the state has climbed to 18, with all of the new cases of “unknown origin” as experts warn there could be hundreds, possibly thousands, of infections in the state.

    And US stocks are moving further off their highs as yet another intraday rally fizzles.

    Over in Australia, which confirmed its first case of community transmission on Monday, organizers said the Formula One season-opening Australian Grand Prix will be held as scheduled on March 15, despite the looming virus threat. The number of cases in Qatar, meanwhile, has climbed to 7.

    * * *

    Update (1420ET): Washington State health officials announced Monday that three more coronavirus patients in King County have died, bringing the US death toll to 5. The new cases announced brings the total cases in the county to 14.

    Jeffrey Duchin, a health officer for Seattle and King County, said during a press conference that the county had confirmed 4 new cases on Monday, bringing its total to 14. Of these 4 new cases, two had died, while 1 previously reported patient had also passed away.

    There are the newly confirmed patients who passed away:

    • A male in his 50s, hospitalized at Highline Hospital. No known exposures.
    • A male in his 70s, a resident of LifeCare, hospitalized at EvergreenHealth in Kirkland. The man had underlying health conditions, and died 3/1/20.

    And the previously confirmed who have died:

    • A female in her 70s, a resident of LifeCare, hospitalized at EvergreenHealth in Kirkland. The woman had underlying health conditions, and died 3/1/20.
    • A female in her 80s, a resident of LifeCare, was hospitalized at EvergreenHealth.
    • In addition, a woman in her 80s, who was already reported as in critical condition at Evergreen, has died. She died on 3/1/20

    The Seattle Times reported that the F5 Office Tower in downtown Seattle had closed for cleaning after an employee had contact with a coronavirus patient.

    Circling back to the press conference, officials promised to do everything they could for our health workers. They added that the people of Washington State can help by “saving masks” for medical workers and people who really need them, which is a surprising thing to say considering the outbreak is obviously accelerating.

    Masks are not recommended for healthy people to prevent infection, but they are so important for our health care workers to have.

    King County Chief Executive Dow Constantine confirmed during an 11 am (local time) press conference that his county is in final negotiations to buy a motel and convert it quickly into modular housing.

    That presser is ongoing for whoever wants to watch:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    In other recent news, Oman has become the latest Middle Eastern state to ban travelers from coronavirus-impacted countries, joining Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

    Senegal has become the second country in sub-Saharan Africa to confirm a coronavirus case, joining a growing list of countries and cities that have reported their first cases on Monday. In Northern Africa, Algeria reported two new cases, bringing its total to 5.

    * * *

    Update (1400ET): French officials just confirmed their country’s 191st case as of Monday, with confirmations doubling in two days. They also reported that earlier figures were incorrect, and that France’s death toll had been reduced to 3, down from 4. The most recent death was an 89-year-old woman who was confirmed post-mortem. 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    In other news, the UAE is evacuating its citizens in Iran as the coronavirus spreads.

    The CDC just announced that it has confirmed Florida’s first two coronavirus cases confirmed late Sunday night.

    One Washington County is also reportedly devising a plan to buy a motel to start housing coronavirus patients.

    * * *

    Update (1345ET): Public health officials in Santa Clara County have confirmed two new cases of COVID-19 on Monday.

    This brings the total number of cases in the county to 9. The state added that the increase in cases is “not unexpected.”

    Read the full media statement below:

    • Media Statement: County of Santa Clara Public Health Department Reports Two New Cases of COVID-19
    • The County of Santa Clara Public Health Department confirms two new cases of COVID-19 in Santa Clara County. This brings the total number of cases to nine.
    • The eighth case is an adult male household contact of a confirmed case in another county. He is under home isolation.
    • The ninth case is an adult male household contact of a previously confirmed case in Santa Clara County.  He is also under home isolation.
    • Due to medical privacy requirements and to protect their identity, further information about these cases will not be released.
    • An increase in cases is not unexpected. The Public Health Department will continue to identify anyone who has come into contact with these cases. The department will also be conducting community surveillance to determine the extent of possible disease spread in our community.
    • Individuals and organizations need to take action to help slow down the spread of the disease. For individuals, the recommendations are simple, but very important:
    • Keep your hands clean by washing them frequently, especially after you touch common surfaces, such as doorknobs, elevator buttons, handrails, light switches, countertops, and tables. It is one of the most important steps you can take to avoid getting sick and spreading germs to others. Always cover your cough and stay home when you are sick.
    • Stay away from people who are sick, and stay home if you are sick.
    • Work on not touching your face because one way viruses spread is when you touch your own mouth, nose or eyes. If you do need to touch your own mouth, nose or eyes, wash your hands before you do so.
    • Start thinking about family preparedness, how to take care of sick family members while not getting infected. Think about a room to isolate a sick person.
    • There are practical measures that can help limit spread by reducing exposure in community settings:
    • Schools: should plan for absenteeism and explore options for learning at home and enhance cleaning of surfaces.
    • Businesses: whenever possible, can replace in-person meetings with video or telephone conferences and increase teleworking options, as well as modify absenteeism policies and enhance cleaning of surfaces.

    Shortly after, Fox News reported that officials in Tampa Bay confirmed two more cases, marking the 3rd and 4th cases in the state of Florida.

    Of course, thanks to Florida’s reputation as a haven for retirees, a reputation that’s bolstered by the fact that Florida has the largest population of senior citizens in the US, the state is particularly vulnerable, as many members of vulnerable communities also live in close proximity to one another. 

    * * *

    Update (1305ET): Boris Johnson said Monday that “a very significant expansion” of the virus is “clearly in the cards.”

    * * *

    Update (1300ET): Public health officials in Illinois have announced another “presumptive positive” case of coronavirus. Like the prior cases, Illinois case No. 4 is also in Cook County.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    The total number of coronavirus cases confirmed in Italy has climbed to more than 2,000 on Sunday, according to a statement from Italian public health officials. The country’s death toll climbed by 18 to 52.

    The march of first-cases continues, with Saudi Arabia becoming the latest to announce its first case on Monday.

    In Washington, 34 firefighters and police are being quarantined after visiting the nursing home in Kirkland where two cases were confirmed over the weekend.

    * * *

    Update (1130ET): Toward the end of the Q&A with reporters following Monday’s press briefing, Dr. Tedros told a reporter that humanity now has a “common enemy” and should focus on fighting it instead of apportioning blame. The WHO Director-General made the remark in response to a question about the culpability of certain governments for the global spread of the coronavirus.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The outbreak only kills roughly 2% of those it infects, Dr. Tedros said. Because of this, he said, Dr. Tedros believes that “the stigma to be honest is more dangerous than the virus itself,” he said. “Let’s really underline that. The stigma is the most dangerous enemy, for me it’s more than the virus itself.”

    Translation: The WHO is prioritizing defending Beijing’s actions – i.e. ‘battling racism’ – over its responsibility to combat the virus.

    “Concerns and worries are understandable. It’s fine to be concerned and worried, but let’s calm down and do the right thing,” he added later before ending the briefing.

    • WHO’S TEDROS SAYS HUMANITY NOW HAS A COMMON ENEMY
    • WHO’S TEDROS SAYS STIGMA IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN VIRUS ITSELF

    Dr. Tedros then launched into a defense of the WHO’s decision to delay the decision to declare the virus a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), before pointing out the fact that in 55 countries have confirmed less than 100 cases.

    “Even if it’s more, it can be contained.”

    So, Dr. Tedros started the press conference explaining why it’s not appropriate to describe the outbreak as a pandemic, before declaring it a “common enemy” of the human race.

    We seem to have lost the thread.

    * * *

    Update (1100ET): The WHO’s daily presser is still ongoing. Meanwhile, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said Monday after two people were diagnosed with the virus that 23 Floridians have now been tested, and 184 are under monitoring by publi health officials.

    California has warned about how the virus could impact its finances.

    * * *

    Update (10:55ET): Mary Lou McDonald, the leader of Ireland’s Sinn Fein, has revealed that her children attend the Dublin school that has been temporarily shuttered after a student who recently returned from Italy was diagnosed with the virus, according to the Guardian.

    The roughly 400 students and staff at the school have been advised to ‘stay home’ and ‘restrict their movements’.

    * * *

    Update (1045ET): WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said Monday that he wouldn’t call the outbreak a pandemic until “evidence warrants” – adding that right now, 90% of cases are in China (even as the virus as been confirmed in nearly 70 countries).

    • WHO’S TEDROS SAYS WILL CALL IT A PANDEMIC IF EVIDENCE WARRANTS
    • WHO’S RYAN SAYS STILL HOPEFUL CONTAINMENT IS RIGHT STRATEGY
    • TRUMP SAYS HE ASKED TO ACCELERATE WORK ON VIRUS VACCINES
    • WHO’S TEDROS STILL URGES CONTAINMENT FOR KOREA, CHINA, ITALY
    • CHINA HAS SENT TECHNICAL TEAM TO AID RESPONSE IN IRAN

    In other news, Qatar’s public health officials have announced 4 new cases of the virus.

    * * *

    Update (1030ET): Tunisia has reported its first case of coronavirus, joining a growing list of major cities and countries that have reported their first cases of the virus on Monday, drawing even more scrutiny to the WHO and its unwillingness to call the outbreak a ‘pandemic’.

    Meanwhile, the WHO will hold its daily press breifing at 10:30 am ET.

    Watch live below:

    * * *

    Update (0900ET): Here’s a funny headline about the G7 emergency coronavirus meeting.

    • FRANCE’S FINANCE MIN. LE MAIRE: G7 CORONAVIRUS MEETING IS TO BE HELD BY TELEPHONE TO LIMIT TRAVEL.

    The ECB, meanwhile, called off a joint event with the European Commission that was supposed to happen on Tuesday because several participants cancelled because of the outbreak.

    In the UK, the total number of cases has climbed to 40.

    In other news: As fear spreads in Washington State, six schools and one university have closed Monday for a ‘deep clean’.

    * * *

    Update (0845ET): Echoing the news out of San Antonio, Rajasthan Health Minister Raghu Sharma warned Monday morning in the US that one of India’s first cases was a passenger who landed in Jaipur from Italy on Feb 29. He was admitted to the isolation ward at a hospital after he showed symptoms of COVID-19 in the screening and at first he tested negative, and he was sent home.

    However, a later confirmatory test later showed he was positive.

    It just underlines the notion that the most dangerous thing about the novel coronavirus is it’s ability to remain undetected for lengths of time.

    * * *

    Update (0820ET): The French death toll doubled Monday morning when health officials reported 2 new deaths, bringing the total to four.

    * * *

    Update (0800ET): Former FDA Director Scott Gottlieb, who has been far more vocal than the current FDA director thanks to his regular appearances on CNBC and other cable news channels, warned during an interview on CNBC Monday morning that the public shouldn’t trust the administration’s rhetoric.

    The fact is, things are far from ‘okay’, Gottlieb said. Now that the government is expanding testing, the US case count will ‘grow rapidly’. The public should start stocking up on supplies and preparing for widespread disruptions. Gottlieb warned that the number of cases in the US has probably already reached the ‘low thousands’. Hundreds could be confirmed by the end of the week.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Scott Gottlieb

    As the GT pointed out earlier, the CDC is telling Americans that wearing facemasks in public right now isn’t necessary. We suspect Gottlieb would beg to differ.

    Meanwhile, Jordan has reported its first 2 cases as the coronavirus outbreak in the Middle East spreads.

    BMW has reportedly told 150 R&D employees to quarantine at home for two weeks ater coming into contact with an employee in Munich contracted the virus. The Munich case was sent home to self-quarantine. Large companies that have now confirmed employees have been infected include Amazon, Nike, Google and BMW. 

    Before we go, we’d just like to point out: In the past 24 hours, Moscow, New Delhi, NYC, Berlin, Rome and Brussels have all confirmed their first cases, as have Indonesia, Portugal and now Jordan on Monday morning.

    And yet…

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Earlier, European Commission President Von der Leyen followed the OECD’s breakthrough warning by saying the risk in the EU had risen from “moderate” to “high.”

    * * *

    Update (0730ET): As we reported last night, a group of drug company CEOs are on their way to meet with President Trump at the White House.”Progress is being made” toward a vaccine, Trump said.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Meanwhile, NY Governor and Trump nemesis Andrew Cuomo told CNN Monday that he expects more cases to be confirmed in New York. NYC’s first patient is a woman in her late 30s who contracted the virus while traveling abroad in Iran.

    Amazingly, despite all of Cuomo’s boasts about his state’s state of the art labs and medical resources, the woman is apparently “isolated in her home.”

    * * *

    Update (0715ET): A Reuters headline from late Sunday just caught our eye, and we felt obligated to share: China’s State Forestry and Grasslands Administration has warned that the world’s second-largest economy could face a devastating “Locust Invasion”.

    • CHINA FACES RISK OF LOCUST INVASION – FORESTRY AND GRASSLAND ADMINISTRATION

    Last month, we reported that China was deploying an “army of ducks” to help Pakistan fight an invasion of locusts, a plague that is also hurting farmers across Africa.

    Looks like Beijing is going to need its ducks back.

    The Global Times, meanwhile, is now mocking the CDC for refusing to recommend that Americans should wear facemasks.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    * * *

    Update (0640ET): Japan reports 15 new coronavirus cases, Reuters reports, bringing the country total to 271, excluding the 705 from the Diamond Princess.

    * * *

    Update (0615ET): Stella Kyriakides, the European Commissioner for Health and Food Safety, confirmed on Monday that the EU Has 2,100 confirmed cases and 38 confirmed deaths across 18 member states. The bloc has also raised its risk alert level from “moderate” to “high”.

    Yet all the borders remain open…

    Shortly after South Korea reported 599 new cases of coronavirus raising its total to 4,335 and death toll to 22, South Korea’s transport ministry said flights from South Korea to the US would begin screening all passengers with mandatory temperature checks – techniques that have already been shown to be not entirely effective.

    Trump has seemed hesitant to slap South Korea and Italy with the same travel restrictions he used on China. If he cares about being reelected, he might want to reconsider.

    China reported 202 additional coronavirus cases and 42 additional deaths last night, as we reported. This morning in the US, Chinese Premier Li said the coronavirus outbreak was at a crucial stage and that positive trends outside Hubei mean strict control measures must be maintained.

    * * *

    Update (0600ET): After six weeks of speculation about how Indonesia had managed to avoid an outbreak, especially considering the thousands of travelers from Hubei that visited the country, the government of the world’s fourth-largest country had confirmed that two patients had tested positive on Monday, Reuters reports.

    In other news, Goldman Sachs has postponed all non-essential travel for its staff “effective immediately” according to a memo seen by Reuters.

    * * *

    Meanwhile, here’s the State Department’s ‘Travel Advisory’ map. Areas marked ‘red’ indicate ‘Do Not Travel’, areas in yellow or yellow-black stripes are ‘exercise increased caution’ (it’s not clearly visible, but Italy has yellow-black stripes).

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The CDC has its own travel advisory map (courtesy of NPR):

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    * * *

    As the wild swings in US equity futures over the last few hours would suggest, we’re headed for another insane week of coronavirus news as America comes to grips with the outbreak as it claims a second life and spreads to the country’s largest city.

    The American coronavirus outbreak accelerated rapidly over the weekend, as health officials confirmed the first virus-linked death on Saturday, before confirming a second death of a US citizen – this time a 70-year-old man – in the same area of Washington State.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    As we explained last night, state and federal public-health officials are focusing on what appears to be a cluster of confirmed cases in Washington, where both deaths have occurred, as well as outbreaks in Oregon and California where patients had no clear path of transmission for the virus, leading officials to suspect that a more widespread outbreak has already begun. Late Sunday night, Gov. Cuomo confirmed the first case in Manhattan, involving a woman who had recently traveled to Iran. The news followed a seemingly unceasing stream of scares and negative tests in America’s largest city, according to the New York Times.

    As we pointed out, the global death toll climbed above 3,000 last night as China reported another 42 deaths.

    “Coronavirus Czar” and Vice President Mike Pence reiterated promises to make more testing kits available to state officials, reiterating promises made over the weekend. President Trump and other administration officials are also scheduled to meet with drug company execs on Monday.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The cases confirmed over the weekend were found in seven states: Washington, California, Illinois, Rhode Island, New York, Florida and Oregon, and included a mix of people who had traveled to high-risk countries, and others believed to have contracted the virus in the US.

    Republican-controlled Florida defied Pence’s urges to ‘remain calm’ and declared a state of emergency on Sunday after the governor’s office confirmed 2 “presumptively positive” cases late Sunday, according to a Florida TV station. 

    Russia reported the first case of the virus in Moscow in a man who returned from Italy on Feb. 23, local newswires reported.

    The cases were discovered in Florida’s Manatee County and Hillsborough County.

    A patient in San Antonio, one of the evacuees, appeared to recover from the coronavirus illness and had been released from a health care facility after having tested negative twice in more than 24 hours was placed back into isolation, even after the CDC’s Dr. Anthony Fauci insisted that there was no evidence that people could be ‘reinfected’ after recovering from the virus.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    India’s health minister confirmed 2 new cases as the virus spreads in India and neighboring Pakistan. Health authorities in Portugal confirmed the first 2 cases in the country early Monday as the virus continues its spread across Europe. And Iran reported 523 new cases of coronavirus Monday morning and 11 new deaths, bringing the total to 1,501 cases confirmed and 66 dead.

    After advising employees to stop non-essential travel over the weekend, Amazon said late Sunday that two of its employees in Milan have contracted the virus and are now under quarantine, the NYT reports.

    “We’re supporting the affected employees who were in Milan and are now in quarantine,” company spokesman Dan Perlet said.

    The world’s biggest online retailer said it was unaware of any U.S. employees who had contracted the virus. On Friday, Amazon told employees to stop non-essential travel, within the United States and beyond. The company also confirmed on Sunday it is moving some recruiting interviews to video rather than in person.

    Over in China, on-the-ground reports claim that most Chinese have returned to work at this point. However, in the rush back to work, the CCP appears to have overlooked a few things…like worker-safety standards.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    As Chinese officials continue their campaign to convince the world, and the Chinese population, that the outbreak is subsiding and that everything will soon return to normal, State TV reports the first of 16 hospitals specially built in Wuhan to tackle the coronavirus epidemic.


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 20:19

  • Friday's Dip Buying By Hedge Funds Was The Most Extreme In The Past Decade: Why This Is Worrying Morgan Stanley
    Friday’s Dip Buying By Hedge Funds Was The Most Extreme In The Past Decade: Why This Is Worrying Morgan Stanley

    Amid the broader market carnage which culminated with the fastest 10% S&P correction from an all time high, last week also we observed the biggest one-day point drop in the Dow Jones ever (this in turn was followed by the biggest one-day Dow point surge ever on Monday). But more notably, following several days of freefall, on Friday equity long/short hedge funds finally stepped up, and whether it ends up being the “best trade”, the “worst trade”, or something in between, Morgan Stanley’s prime brokerage writes that “the buying of US equities among Equity L/S funds on Friday was the biggest we’ve seen in the past decade.” And while Monday’s ramp certainly eased some concerns about another year of woeful hedge fund performance, Morgan Stanley cautions that depending on what happens to stocks from here, it “raises the risks that we could see a rotation and alpha drawdown, should these flows look to reverse in the future.”

    As we first observed two weeks ago, the record high leverage, crowding, and factor risks among the hedge fund community have raised the risk for future violent hedge fund rotations.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    And while we have not yet seen these risks realized in the sharp sell-off over the past weeks, the recent behavior and mixed performance among HFs has made Morgan Stanley more concerned that we could be getting closer to a sharp rotation. In particular, three of the things the bank is watching have changed recently and are driving its greater concern:

    • HFs have been actively adding to gross leverage, particularly by adding longs in the largest amounts of the past decade last Thurs and Fri. This is concerning because in 3 of the 4 similar past episodes since 2014, large long selling has followed afterwards and has coincided with negative HF alpha (see Figure 1 below)
    • L/S funds bought large amounts of Momentum last week (and sold Value), once again crushing Marko Kolanovic’s argument that a rotation out of momentum/low-vol and into value stocks is imminent.
    • Performance (while good relative to the markets) has declined in absolute terms into negative territory and crowded stock performance has been mixed

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    So was Friday’s record dip buying a sign that hedge funds have finally gotten their mojo back and are again able to time market inflection points? According to Morgan Stanley that is hardly the case, and instead last week’s flush into risk assets merely underscores the top three rotation risks, which are as follows:

    Rotation Risk Consideration #1: Largest Long Buying of Past Decade

    Throughout the sharp sell-off last week, HF activity showed almost no signs of active de-grossing. In fact, the opposite was largely the case as L/S funds bought longs throughout last week and Quant funds generally added to both sides of their  books to keep their leverage from falling as fast as it would simply due to the falling markets. Put simply, there were no real signs of capitulation among Hedge funds.

    While this behavior of buying dips and adding to gross exposure is fairly common during market pullbacks, the magnitude of the long buying among L/S funds spiked to unprecedented levels on Friday. For context, the long buying on Thursday was in line with the prior high from 2010-2019 and Friday’s buying was ~75% higher than that. Similarly, large long buying has often come near short term market troughs, aside from what happened in late 2018 (i.e. HFs generally exhibited good timing from a broad market perspective). Looking at the peak long buying within the green ovals in Figure 1, they peaked on the following dates:

    • Feb 6, 2014
    • Aug 27, 2015
    • Feb 9, 2018
    • Oct 17, 2018

    However, this behavior raises the rotation risk that Morgan Stanley’s Prime Brokerage has been getting more concerned about for a while. Essentially, the concern is that HFs have tended to sell longs afterwards (often as markets rebounded) and this selling coincided with negative alpha from L/S funds.

    Notably, the one time there wasn’t a subsequent alpha drawdown in the next few months was early 2018. But as one can see from the next chart below, the long buying then was a reversal from long selling into the Jan ’18 peak, rather than an acceleration of long buying as we’ve seen recently. The chart below tracks the trend in the cumulative long activity over time to help show when longs have been built up or reduced. To be clear, HFs were covering shorts aggressively from 4Q17 to early ’18 so nets were going higher, but L/S funds weren’t arguably pressing their longs into the market high.

    In addition, this chart shows that, while the long buying in Jan 2016 and Aug 2019 were not quite as extreme over a short period of time (as highlighted in the green rectangles in Figure 1), the long risk had been building for months leading up to  the drawdowns in 1Q16 and Sep-Oct 2019.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Rotation Risk Consideration #2: Increased Momentum Buying (and Value Selling)

    It’s not just that L/S funds were adding risk by buying the dip last week, what’s also notable is what they were buying. From a sector/industry perspective, they were mostly buying areas they’re already quite long: Software, IT Services (payments), Aero & Defense, Semis, Internet Retail, Hotels Restaurants & Leisure, and Entertainment.

    From a factor standpoint, this manifested itself in one of the largest weeks of buying of Momentum in many years. It was the largest since last Sep (during the brief rebound after the sharp drawdown) and last Aug. In addition, it was the largest selling of Value in years. From a net exposure standpoint, L/S fund Momentum exposure is around the 50th %-tile since 2010 (and similar to where it stood prior to the selloff last Sep) while Value is around the 10th %-tile since 2010.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Rotation Risk Consideration #3: Performance Declines

    For many HFs that are net long the market, there were few places to hide last week. Thus, it’s not surprising that funds lost about 4-5% gross last week as markets were down about 10%. This shifts returns into negative territory on a YTD basis. Needless to say, dipping into negative territory on a YTD basis early in the year is very different from doing so late in the year and leads to different investing behavior. Thus, being down about 2% hasn’t apparently triggered large de-grossing, especially as equity markets are now down 8-9% on the year.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    For those looking for a performance trigger, Morgan Stanley suggests that one reference point might be early 2016. As the S&P sold off 9% from Dec 31 to Jan 20, L/S funds were down about 4-5%. However, the tipping point was that as the S&P rallied towards the end of Jan to be down only 5%, L/S were still down about 3.5-4% (i.e. there was little upside capture on the rebound). When markets started to sell-off again in early Feb and funds went back to being down closer to 5% on the year, they aggressively switched to de-grossing.

    So while performance has held up so far, the concern is that a breakdown in returns could cause risk appetite to decline and de-grossing to increase. Two things to note on this front are:

    1. The crowded longs in the US have held in relatively well lately, but the 2 best days last week were last Thurs & Fri, which coincided with outsized long buying among HFs
    2. The crowded shorts have not been working well, which may suggest less cushion if the longs start underperforming

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    In conclusion, Morgan Stanley reminds us that a few weeks ago that the Combined Risk Metric of leverage-crowding-factors was back at highs, BUT that we had not yet seen aggressive HF behavior at that point and the rotations usually came a couple months after the metric hit highs. As such, “with the changes in behavior last week and more time passing, the risks of a rotation appear to be greater now and if capitulation (i.e. de-grossing) does play out among HFs, this would likely be fairly painful.”


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 20:05

  • Beto O'Rourke Becomes Third Former Democratic Rival To Endorse Biden As 'Super Tuesday' Looms
    Beto O’Rourke Becomes Third Former Democratic Rival To Endorse Biden As ‘Super Tuesday’ Looms

    Update (2010ET): Buttigieg is looking like a strong contender in the nascent race to become Joe Biden’s VP pick.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    * * *

    Beto O’Rourke will be the third former Democratic presidential contender to endorse Vice President Joe Biden Monday night during a rally in Dalls, the New York Times reports.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Former Representative Beto O’Rourke of Texas, who became a progressive star in his spirited race against Senator Ted Cruz before mounting a less-successful presidential campaign, will endorse Joseph R. Biden Jr. and appear with him in Dallas Monday night, according to two Democratic officials familiar with his plans.

    Mr. O’Rourke, who dropped out of the primary last fall, has returned to his native El Paso and largely stayed out of the campaign.

    But one night before the Texas primary, he will line up with his fellow former candidates, Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar, in their effort to coalesce behind Mr. Biden and slow the momentum of Bernie Sanders.

    The shock-and-awe message is clear: Despite his innumberable stumbles and the fact that his campaign was on life-support just days ago (though he still has tens of millions in his campaign war chest), the DNC has anointed Joe Biden the winner of the primary.

    At this point, the only non-Bernie frontrunner who hasn’t dropped out is Elizabeth Warren, who was probably busy Monday night celebrating the demise of Chris Matthews’ career, just the latest ‘scalp’ on Warren’s wall.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    On Twitter, Warren was busy sharing one of the several stories published Monday bashing the rich over imaginary resource hoarding that isn’t even happening.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Still, Robyn Kanner’s 72 hours aren’t yet up.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Here’s Buttigieg endorsing Biden live. We expect to see Beto and Amy shortly.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Though Bloomberg is stubbornly hanging on (for now), unless something incredibly shocking happens tomorrow, it’s pretty much down to Biden vs. Bernie. Although, as Trump argued earlier, it’s not really a race – it’s a coup.


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 20:04

  • Matthews Out At MSNBC After Sexism, Bigotry, Racism, & Senior Moments
    Matthews Out At MSNBC After Sexism, Bigotry, Racism, & Senior Moments

    Oh, the perfect irony that after almost four years of abusing Donald Trump (during his campaign and presidency) for endless character flaws, it will be President Trump that outlasts the MSDNC anchor.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    At the beginning of tonight’s show – ‘Hardball’ – Chris Matthews abruptly announced his retirement after a tumultuous month that included calls for his firing.

    “I’m retiring. This is the last ‘Hardball’ on MSNBC, and obviously this isn’t for lack of interest in politics,” the 74-year-old said in addressing the audience in scripted remarks.

    “As you can tell, I’ve loved every minute of my 20 years as host of Hardball. Every morning I read the papers and gung-ho to get to work. Not many people have had this privilege.”

    “Retired” is one way of calling it…

    Matthews was notably absent from the network’s live coverage of the South Carolina primary on Saturday, one day after being accused of sexual harassment by GQ columnist Laura Bassett (lambasting Matthews for comments made to a variety of women during his MSNBC career).

    “I was afraid to name him at the time for fear of retaliation from the network; I’m not anymore. It was Chris Matthews. In 2016, right before I had to go on his show and talk about sexual-assault allegations against Donald Trump, Matthews looked over at me in the makeup chair next to him and said, ‘Why haven’t I fallen in love with you yet?

    So he is a sexist?

    “Another time, he stood between me and the mirror and complimented the red dress I was wearing for the segment. ‘You going out tonight?’ he asked,” Bassett wrote, adding that Matthews told the makeup artists at the time, “Make sure you wipe this off her face after the show. We don’t make her up so some guy at a bar can look at her like this.”

    And a bigot?

    Then things got super awkward during coverage of President Donald Trump’s rally in South Carolina on Friday evening when Matthews thought Republican South Carolina Senator Tim Scott was Jaime Harrison, a Democrat running against the other senator from that state, Lindsey Graham.

    The exchange between Matthews and Harrison occurred after the two had already spoken several minutes prior. Later, when Matthews saw Scott standing next to Graham, he mistook the junior South Carolina senator for Graham’s black Democratic opponent.

    “Jaime, I see you standing next to the guy you’re gonna beat right there, maybe, maybe maybe, Lindsey Graham,” Matthews quipped.

    “That’s Tim Scott, Tim Scott,” a female voice said off-camera.

    “Jaime?” Matthews said.

    “Who is that?” said the obviously confused MSNBC anchor after another correction.

    “That’s Tim Scott,” Harrison said, smiling.

    And is having senior moments?

    Confusing two Americans because they have the same skin color?

    Or is he racist?

    Perhaps he should have ‘removed from office’ sooner?

    In fact after his statement of retirement, Matthews attempted to address some of the recent controversies and allegations around him, trying to offer an apology.

    “After my conversation with NBC, I decided tonight will be my last ‘Hardball.’ I’ll tell you why. The younger generations are ready to take the reigns. We see them in Politics, the media, they have proven in the workplace. They grew up with better standards, fair standards.”

    Compliments on a woman’s appearance some men, including me, might have once incorrectly thought were okay were never okay. Certainly not today. For making such comments in the past, I’m sorry.”

    Have a great retirement Chris. Watching Trump win in November.


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 19:40

  • The Nobility Of Tulsi Gabbard
    The Nobility Of Tulsi Gabbard

    Authored by W.J.Astore via BracingViews.com,

    In the South Carolina primary won on Saturday by Joe Biden, Tulsi Gabbard earned only 1.3% of the vote.  Her poor showing was due in part to her outcast status among the Democratic establishment joined by mainstream media outlets like MSNBC and CNN. 

    Speaking of CNN, I caught a few minutes of coverage over the weekend during which its commentators confessed they couldn’t understand why Tulsi was still running. One person (Anderson Cooper, the weasel) suggested she was angling for a job with Fox News. 

    Of course, Tulsi’s principled opposition to regime-change wars and other disastrous U.S. foreign policy decisions went unmentioned.  When her name is mentioned by the corporate-owned media, it’s usually in the context of the candidate most likely to succeed – in Russia.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    By running in the election, Tulsi Gabbard continues to make an invaluable contribution:

    She highlights the power of the military-industrial-Congressional-media complex and its rejection of any candidate willing to challenge it

    Gabbard’s status as a major in the Hawaii Army National Guard, her service in Congress on the House Armed Services Committee, her military deployments to Iraq: all of this is downplayed or dismissed.  Meanwhile, Mayor Pete’s brief stint in Afghanistan is celebrated as the height of military service.  What’s the difference between them?  Mayor Pete plays ball with big donors and parrots talking points of the Complex – Tulsi doesn’t.

    In a recent op-ed for The Hill, Tulsi yet again does America a service by calling out red baiting in America’s elections.  Here’s how her op-ed begins:

    Reckless claims by anonymous intelligence officials that Russia is “helping” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) are deeply irresponsible. So was former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s calculated decision Tuesday to repeat this unsubstantiated accusation on the debate stage in South Carolina. Enough is enough. I am calling on all presidential candidates to stop playing these dangerous political games and immediately condemn any interference in our elections by out-of-control intelligence agencies.

    A “news article” published last week in The Washington Post, which set off yet another manufactured media firestorm, alleges that the goal of Russia is to trick people into criticizing establishment Democrats. This is a laughably obvious ploy to stifle legitimate criticism and cast aspersions on Americans who are rightly skeptical of the powerful forces exerting control over the primary election process. We are told the aim of Russia is to “sow division,” but the aim of corporate media and self-serving politicians pushing this narrative is clearly to sow division of their own — by generating baseless suspicion against the Sanders campaign.

    Tulsi is right here – and she’s right when she says that:

    The American people have the right to know this information in order to put Russia’s alleged “interference” into proper perspective. It is a mystery why the Intelligence Community would want to hide these details from us. Instead it is relying on highly dubious and vague insinuations filtered through its preferred media outlets, which seem designed to create a panic rather than actually inform the public about a genuine threat.

    All this does is undermine voters’ trust in our elections, which is what we are constantly told is the goal of Russia.

    She also accurately notes how the “corporate media will do everything they can to turn the general election into a contest of who is going to be ‘tougher’ on Russia. This tactic is necessary to propagandize the American people into shelling over their hard-earned tax dollars to the Pentagon to fund the highly lucrative nuclear arms race that the military-industrial complex craves.

    Tulsi Gabbard may not be in the democratic race much longer, but that’s not because she lacks guts.  Indeed, her willingness to buck the system – and her commitment to making the world a less militaristic place – make her a notable candidate.  She’s been a noble voice crying in a corrupt and self-serving wilderness.


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 19:20

  • Bill Fleckenstein: Coronavirus Will Cause A "Confidence Crisis" In The Fed
    Bill Fleckenstein: Coronavirus Will Cause A “Confidence Crisis” In The Fed

    Money manager and metals specialist Bill Fleckenstein appeared on the Quoth the Raven Podcast on Sunday to give his thoughts about gold, the market’s reaction to coronavirus and the Fed’s coming “confidence crisis”.

    Gold

    First, talking about last week’s move in gold, Fleckenstein says he doesn’t attribute the move to margin calls, as many had speculated. He instead says that gold likely just fell victim to “hot money”, which he noted often happens when gold spot rallies hard and the miners don’t follow – exactly what happened last week.

    Bill said:

    “Gold has gone up, but the mining stocks really didn’t participate. That concerned me because when the mining stock sputter and gold keeps going, then gold gets hit,” he says.

    He continued:

    “When gold was spiking on the coronavirus news, it didn’t quite act right in conjunction with other things, and I was a little nervous. Then, of course, it got destroyed on Friday. I suspect there was a lot of trend following money in gold. A lot of hot money. Hot money because it’s going up.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The Market’s Volatility

    The rally late last week was because people thought the “Fed was going to save them”. Fleckenstein says he doesn’t believe it to be the case that the Fed is going to give the market a rate cut anytime soon. He thinks the market will have to crash further before central banks intervene.

    He also doesn’t think we’ve seen real panic in the equity markets yet. 

    “When I look at the personalities of some of the absolute crap, like Tesla, they’re still valued like a total joke. I don’t think we saw a hell of a lot of panic,” he says.

    “This was not about illiquidity”.

    The Fed’s Coming Crisis

    Bill continued: “The Central Banks are going to get panicked. They’re panic prone because they’re so stupid,” he says.

    He also thinks the market is eventually going to wise-up to what the Fed is doing: 

    “This is the moment in time we have been waiting for. Those of us who think these central bank policies are no good. We’re at the moment in time where they could lose credibility to a certain degree,” he says of the Federal Reserve.

    “Slowly but surely people could realize it’s not working.”

    He continued: “The Fed probably won’t cut today and the market’s going to keep getting tatered until the Fed does. But the real opportunity on the short side will be the big rally after when the Fed cuts. That rally ought to fail. If that failed rally occurs and they start down again, they will accelerate a lot, and you will have broken the psychology of the ‘The Fed can rescue us’.”

    “Then you can have much more of the crash. That’s kind of the road map that I see,” he says.

    You can listen to the entire podcast here:

    *  *  *

    The QTR Podcast is a completely, 100% listener supported podcast that is always going to be free. The podcast is full time work, if you enjoy the content, please support the QTR Podcast in any, or all of the following ways:

    Please make a small recurring donation, which is gratefully accepted at: https://www.patreon.com/QTRResearch


    Tyler Durden

    Mon, 03/02/2020 – 19:00

Digest powered by RSS Digest

Today’s News 2nd March 2020

  • Does The Coronavirus Make The Case For World Government?
    Does The Coronavirus Make The Case For World Government?

    Authored by Jeff Deist via The Mises Institute,

    Sometimes terrible things happen without any human malfeasance, and the novel Wuhan coronavirus may in fact be one of those things. It is entirely plausible the virus emerged from “wet markets” in the Hubei Province of China rather than as a fumbled (or worse, intentionally released) bioweapon cooked up by the Xi Jinping government. 

    We may never know, of course. But easy or readily apparent answers to the question of how this could have been avoided should be viewed with the skepticism appropriate to any state propaganda. Crises of all kinds, whether economic, political, military, or health, send ideologues scrambling to explain how such events fit neatly into their worldview. In fact, political partisans often attempt to paint any crisis as having occurred in the first place precisely because their policies and preferences have not been adopted. 

    The Wuhan coronavirus seems tailor-made for this. Alarmists who argue for (i) much more robust and comprehensive “public health” measures by national governments and (ii) greater supranational coordination inevitably point to infectious diseases as justification for increased state power over personal medical decisions. Scary and fast-spreading viruses are perfect fodder for their busybody argument that people cannot simply be left to their own devices.

    Cross-border outbreaks of illnesses are particularly well suited to the preexisting bureaucratic desire for power over populations: they make the public much more willing to accept forced quarantines and arrests for noncompliance; forced immunizations; involuntary commitments to state facilities; curfews; restrictions on business operations and travel; and import controls. They also allow public health officials to commandeer and manage efforts to find “the cure,” who then take credit when the virus eventually relents. 

    These are the sorts of things that authoritarian politicians want all the time. Crises simply provide an opportunity to ratchet up their power and also to accustom the public to being ordered around and taking cues from centralized government sources.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Antistate libertarians are not immune to this phenomenon of attempting to place square events into round holes. We tend to explain crises as the result of state (or central bank) interference, either created or made worse by the lack of market discipline, incentives, and property rights lacking due to state action or state regulation. Libertarians think the Food and Drug Administration, for example, kills more people than it saves by approving bad drugs and delaying regulatory approvals for promising treatments. 

    Moreover, an individualist libertarian perspective on bodily sovereignty poses an obvious challenge to public health. No individual should be forced to accept quarantine or immunization against his will, and in fact no individual should be forced to consider herd immunity or other collectivist notions when making medical decisions. Just as most libertarians don’t think Doritos and Mountain Dew should be banned because their consumption imposes “public” healthcare costs in a statist/fascist system of mandatory insurance and tax-funded Medicaid, most don’t think that individual health decisions should be overridden by politicians—even in an “emergency” outbreak situation. 

    So how do we reconcile public health with individual rights? Should the latter be sacrificed to protect the former?

    Three observations present themselves.

    First, even the highly authoritarian Chinese national state has been unable to contain the virus, though it can cordon off whole cities by dictatorial fiat and impose wholesale house arrest over cities in a manner unthinkable in Western countries. Chinese state police literally drag people suspected of carrying the virus out of their cars, forcibly put them handcuffed in hazmat vehicles, and haul them off to what amount to prison hospitals. Chinese citizens who speak out publicly against the Xi government’s handling of the crisis are arrested. So, if the Chinese government can’t contain it, even with martial law and control over media, how in the world do Western countries expect to do so? Imagine trying to quarantine, say, Dallas and Fort Worth!

    Second, poor countries (and China is quite poor per capita compared to the West, ranking around sixty-fifth internationally) almost invariably suffer from worse public health conditions. Sanitation, nutrition, and access to drugs, facilities, and competent doctors matter a great deal when it comes to incubating infectious diseases. Richer countries are healthier countries, and the West benefits when conditions improve and modernize in the Third World.

    Third, we already have de facto supranational bodies such as World Health Organization tasked with preventing and lessening the spread of diseases like the coronavirus. The WHO has been around since 1948 and hasn’t prevented a host of modern epidemics like SARS and Zika; excatly what new international agency or organization will do better?

    If anything, pandemics call for decentralization of treatment. After all, the best approach is to isolate infected people rather than bringing them into large hospital populations in crowded city centers. What doctor or nurse wants to work in a hospital full of coronavirus cases?

    We might wish for a utopian libertarian answer to public health crises like the coronovirus, along the lines of a Rothbardian externality argument for airborne pollution. But sometimes bad things simply happen. The best hope is market incentives, the rapid application of individual human ingenuity and self-interest to the situation. Liberty is better, not perfect. And governments, including the Chinese government, are clueless as always.


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 23:55

  • Gabbard Urges Trump: Don't Drag Us Into War At Bidding Of Islamist Dictator Of Turkey
    Gabbard Urges Trump: Don’t Drag Us Into War At Bidding Of Islamist Dictator Of Turkey

    Tulsi Gabbard has once again gone on the offensive, skewering Washington mainstream foreign policy and the Trump administration’s refusal to stand up to “dictator” Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

    Trump reportedly told Erdogan in a phone call last week as the Idlib crisis escalates, now in an open state of war between the Turkish and Syrian armies, and with Russia supporting the latter, that the US “reaffirmed” its support for Turkey in Idlib. Ankara is now demanding greater support from NATO as well, after Russian jets were widely believed behind last Thursday’s massive air strike which killed 33 Turkish soldiers.

    Congresswoman and Democratic presidential hopeful Gabbard attacked this stance in a weekend video statement, urging Trump instead to make clear that “the United States will not be dragged into a war with Russia by the aggressive Islamist expansionist dictator of Turkey via NATO.”

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    She also slammed the mainstream media’s efforts to renew holding up al-Qaeda terrorists on the ground in Idlib as mere “rebels” and “freedom fighters” — saying it’s a disgrace to men and women in uniform who signed up to fight terrorists in the wake of 9/11.

    “Turkey’s been supporting ISIS and al-Qaeda terrorists from behind the scenes for years,” she pointed out.

    “Turkey’s Erdogan wants to create an Islamist caliphate in Syria, reestablish the Islamist Ottoman Empire, and is working with al-Qaeda and other terrorists to achieve his goal.”

    “He wants to be the caliph,” she added, explaining further he’s not a “friend” of America, but remains one of the most dangerous dictators in the world.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    She ended by urging the American people to get behind passage of her Stop Arming Terrorists Act, which seeks to remove all support to terrorist factions in Syria as well as aid to those state actors like Turkey which back them.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Notably, she also called out President Trump for contradicting past accurate statements which highlighted the terrorist links of Syria’s so-called “moderate rebels”. 

    And in what could be a first, Syrian state media has reportedly translated Gabbard’s speech and broadcast it all over Syria.

    * * *

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 23:30

  • Were Coronavirus Samples Destroyed By China To Coverup The Outbreak?
    Were Coronavirus Samples Destroyed By China To Coverup The Outbreak?

    Via GreatGameIndia.com,

    Since the outbreak of Coronavirus in Wuhan, the Chinese Communist Party has concealed the epidemic from the local government to the central government and shirked from its responsibility. Recently, Caixin, a Beijing-based media group published a shocking report that the Hubei Provincial Health and Medical Commission ordered the destruction of Coronavirus samples. Soon after the story was gagged with the article subsequently taken down.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Were Coronavirus Samples Destroyed By Chinese Health Commission?

    Gene sequence detected and reported at the end of December

    On February 26, Caixin published a shocking article titled “Tracking the Source of New Coronavirus Gene Sequencing“. Caixin sources told GreatGameIndia on condition of anonymity that the article was taken down due to mounting pressure from the Chinese authorities. The article was archived on the web but even the archived version redirects to an error page. So, we decided to publish the Caixin report in full translated into English from Chinese (found at the above link).

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Archived version of the deleted Caixin report “Tracking the Source of Novel Coronavirus Gene Sequencing” also redirects to an error page

    The Caixin report said:

    As of February 24, more than 2660 people have died and more than 77,000 people have been diagnosed with the novel coronavirus, a novel coronavirus similar to SARS. When was it found? Caixin reporters conducted interviews from various sources and sorted out relevant papers and database materials. By piecing together all sorts of information, the full picture is gradually emerging.

    The Caixin article stated that there were no less than 9 unknown pneumonias before the end of December last year. Samples of the cases were collected from various hospitals in Wuhan. Gene sequencing showed that the pathogen was a SARS-like Coronavirus (similarity is about 80% and infectious). These test results were returned to the hospital and reported to the Health and Medical Commission and the Center for Disease Control.

    A private enterprise in Huangpu district of Guangzhou, analysed the gene sequence of the virus on December 26. The results of the study found that it was most similar to the bat SARS Coronavirus, with an overall similarity of about 87% and a similarity with SARS of about 81%.

    The company officials communicated with the hospital and CDC by telephone on December 27 and 28, and even went to Wuhan to report all the results of the analysis in person to the hospital management and CDC on December 29 and 30.

    Zhang Jixian, director of the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Xinhua Hospital of Hubei Province, received four consecutive unexplained pneumonia cases on December 26. On December 27, Zhang Jixian reported the discovery of four “unknown viral pneumonias” to the hospital, which was inturn reported by the hospital to Jiang Han District Center for Disease Control.

    From December 28th to 29th, Xinhua Hospital treated 3 patients from the South China Seafood Market. They had similar symptoms of viral pneumonia. At 1 pm on December 29th, Xia Wenguang, deputy director of Xinhua Hospital, convened ten experts to discuss the seven cases. The experts agreed that the situation was unusual. Xia Wenguang reported directly to the disease control department of the provincial and municipal health committees.

    On December 29, the industry leader Huada Gene (Shenzhen, China) completed a case of gene sequencing, and the results showed that the virus and SARS gene sequence similarity was as high as 80%. On January 1, the company’s three sample test reports were reported to the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission.

    On December 30, Beijing Boao Medical Laboratory reported the patient report to the doctor, and the test result was – “SARS Coronavirus”.

    Health and Medical Commission of Hubei Province ordered destruction of Coronavirus case samples

    The Caixin report said that it was not until January 9th that the Chinese Communist Party officially declared the pathogen a “new Coronavirus.”

    The report also quoted a person from a gene sequencing company who disclosed that on January 1, 2020, he “received a phone call from an official of the Health and Medical Commission of Hubei Province, informing him that samples of cases of new Coronavirus in Wuhan could not be re-examined. Existing case samples must be destroyed and sample information cannot be disclosed. Relevant papers and related data cannot be released to the public. If you detect it in the future, you must report to us.”

    This article from Caixin has now been deleted, but has been circulated widely overseas and in Chinese social media attracting a strong response from the administration.

    Beijing authorities concealed the epidemic

    In fact, not only the authorities in Wuhan and Hubei provinces and related medical units were involved in the Coronavirus coverup, but also the National Health and Medical Committee of the Communist Party of China and the Chinese authorities concealed the epidemic.

    On January 5th, the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center detected a new SARS-like Coronavirus and sequenced it to obtain the entire genome sequence of the virus. On the same day, the center immediately reported to the National Health Commission of the Communist Party of China and “suggested to take corresponding prevention and control measures in public places.”

    The report states that the virus shares 89.11% homology with SARS Coronavirus and is named Wuhan-Hu-1 Coronavirus.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    On January 5, the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center reported to the National Health Commission of the Communist Party of China, asking for the prevention of Coronavirus

    Numerous such internal circulars, notifications and reports of studies warning the Chinese administrations were sent out in the weeks leading to the outbreak which were not only ignored but actively suppressed from reaching to people. We have cataloged these findings in our scientific investigation on the origin of Coronavirus – the COVID19 Files – from five major areas, including epidemiological investigation, virus gene comparison, cross-species infection research, key “intermediate hosts” and the findings on the Wuhan P4 lab.

    However, the Wuhan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Health Commission of the Communist Party of China declared that the epidemic was “preventable and controllable” until January 19, and “the possibility of limited transmission from person to person was not ruled out”.

    On February 3rd, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Hua Chunying said that since January 3rd, the Chinese Communist Party has notified the United States of a total of 30 outbreak information and control measures. Immediately after the remarks were published, it was strongly condemned.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    When Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Hua Chunying’s remarks appeared in the press, it immediately aroused the anger of the Chinese people

    However, it was not until January 20th that Xi Jinping and Li Keqiang made public statements on the prevention and control of the epidemic for the first time. Zhong Nanshan, a CCP expert, acknowledged for the first time that the new Coronavirus was “person-to-person.”

    On January 26, the Communist Party of China set up a task force for epidemic prevention and control with Li Keqiang as the leader. It was after more than two months since the outbreak.

    Wuhan pneumonia cases were discovered by the Communist Party of China CDC, Wuhan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the CPC Health and Medical Committee, and the Hubei Health and Medical Committee by December 1st, and the relevant results were published in international journals.

    However, the Chinese Communist Party has been concealing the epidemic, suppressing doctors and people who spread the truth of the epidemic, and spreading a false narrative that the epidemic is “preventable and controllable” and is not “person-to-person”.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    The claims of the Caixin report that gene sequencing studies carried out by the Chinese administration found that COVID-19 Coronavirus is almost 80% similar to SARS gives further credence to GreatGameIndia‘s report on how Chinese Biowarfare agents smuggled SARS Coronaviruses from Canada and weaponized it – Coronavirus Bioweapon. Further, the Canadian Scientist Frank Plummer who received these SARS Coronavirus samples of the first patient from Saudi Arabia was found dead in mysterious conditions in Nairobi, Kenya within 11 days of the publication of our report.

    *  *  *

    We need your support to carry on our independent and investigative research based journalism on the external and internal threats facing India. Your contribution however small helps us keep afloat. Kindly consider donating to GreatGameIndia.


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 23:05

  • Anti-Greta Knocks 'Climate Alarmists' During CPAC Speech
    Anti-Greta Knocks ‘Climate Alarmists’ During CPAC Speech

    A 19-year-old European activist dubbed the ‘anti-Greta’ slammed “climate alarmists” on Friday at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Maryland, according to Bloomberg

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Self-proclaimed “climate realist” Naomi Seibt, who has roughly 60,000 followers on YouTube, told a panel sponsored by the Illinois-based Heartland Institute think tank: “The climate has always been changing, and so it’s ridiculous to say we deny climate change.”

    Man vastly overestimates his power if he thinks he can, with CO2 emissions, destroy the climate.”

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Seibt dismissed allegations she is being used by climate skeptics to woo young people and counter Thunberg, the Swedish activist who has won international acclaim for arguing the world needs to rapidly throttle the greenhouse gas emissions fueling a warming world. “I am not the puppet of the right wing or the climate deniers or the Heartland Institute either,” Seibt said. –Bloomberg

    Seibt has come under fire after a video began circulating on Friday of her saying “The normal German consumer is at the bottom, so to speak. Then the Muslims come somewhere in between. And the Jew is at the top. That is the suppression characteristic,” remarks she said were taken out of context, and that she was expressing her view that it is “wrong to comment on different races differently and view them differently.”

     


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 22:40

  • Equity & Oil Futures Soar After BoJ Promises To "Ensure Market Stability"
    Equity & Oil Futures Soar After BoJ Promises To “Ensure Market Stability”

    Update (2225ET): Well who could have seen that coming? Following The BoJ’s promise to do ‘whatever it takes’ to stabilize the markets (though nothing about the economy of course), the reaction was delayed until someone got the tap on the shoulder to buy with both hands and feet…

    NKY Futs are up 900 points from the opening lows…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Dow futures are now up 850 points from the opening lows…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    WTI is soaring…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    And Treasury yields have reversed dramatically higher…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Did Stevey make the call?

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Or is The National Team on the case?

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    *  *  *

    Update (2000ET): Following, now confirmed, rumors of The BoJ “striving to provide market stability via open market operations and asset purchases”, US Treasury yields are collapsing…

    2Y Yields are down a stunning 15bps and 30Y down 11bps to 1.58%…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    10Y is getting very close to 1.00%!

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    And bonds are signaling a lot more pain for stocks

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    …as stocks refuse to bounce…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    And eurodollars’ open signaling 38bps of rate-cuts in March and 50ps by April…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    As the yield curve is getting dramatically more inverted (3m10y – 8bps)…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Safe-haven flows are flooding back into gold, pushing Futures back above $1600…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    *  *  *

    After Friday afternoon’s combination of Jay Powell’s statement and a major rebalancing flow sent stocks soaring into the close, a lack of the much-demanded ‘coordinated global easing’ this weekend has spoiled the party and futures are opening down hard.

    Friday’s almost 1000 point surge in less than an hour – on absolutely nothing but hope that somebody will do something –

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Oil is also collapsing with WTI at a $43 handle…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    And gold is bid…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    And bond prices have hit a new high, erasing the late-Friday spike in yields…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Additionally, we detailed earlier, the following chart from Deutsche Bank shows, overall liquidity for S&P500 futures has fallen to all time lows even though the S&P was trading near all time highs as recently as a week ago. As such, the recent melt up levitation was nothing more than a mirage, propelled mostly by stock buybacks among the Top 5 tech stocks and fickle retail investors, and once these were removed, the market entered the proverbial “trapdoor opening” formation.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The problem is that virtually no liquidity, extreme moves to the downside are now very likely which in turn creates a reflexive relationship with risk sentiment, as the lower the liquidity and greater the selloff, the higher volatility surges leading to even lower liquidity, even more selling and so on.

    In short: absent central bank intervention, it will be virtually impossible for any major player to arrest the market’s collapse.

    Of course, that is a big ask the market is already pricing in almost 4 rate-cuts in 2020…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    And almost completely priced-in 2 rate-cuts in March…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    That’s a lot to expect from a Fed that doesn’t want to signal panic and burn through its ammunition so fast without evidence of economic disruption.


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 22:29

  • Humanity Is Making A Very Important Decision When It Comes To Assange
    Humanity Is Making A Very Important Decision When It Comes To Assange

    Authored by Caitlin Johnstone via CaitlinJohnstone.com,

    The propagandists have all gone dead silent on the WikiLeaks founder they previously were smearing with relentless viciousness, because they no longer have an argument. The facts are all in, and yes, it turns out the US government is certainly and undeniably working to exploit legal loopholes to imprison a journalist for exposing its war crimes. That is happening, and there is no justifying it.

    So the narrative managers, by and large, have gone silent.

    Which is good. Because it gives us an opening to seize control of the narrative.

    It’s time to go on the offensive with this. Assange supporters have gotten so used to playing defense that it hasn’t fully occurred to us to go on a full-blown charge. I’ve been guilty of this as well; I’ll be letting myself get bogged down in some old, obsolete debate with someone about some obscure aspect of the Swedish case or something, not realizing that none of that matters anymore. All the narrative manipulations that were used to get Assange to this point are impotent, irrelevant expenditures of energy compared to the fact that we now have undeniable evidence that the US government is working to set a precedent which will allow it to jail any journalist who exposes its misdeeds, and we can now force Assange’s smearers to confront this reality.

    “Should journalists be jailed for exposing US war crimes? Yes or no?”

    That’s the debate now. Not Russia. Not Sweden. Not whether he followed proper bail protocol or washed his dishes at the embassy. That’s old stuff. That’s obsolete. That’s playing defense.

    Now we play offense: “Should journalists be jailed for exposing US war crimes? Yes or no?”

    Demand an answer. Call attention to them and demand that they answer. Dig them out of their hidey holes and make them answer this. Drag them out into the light and make them answer this question in front of everyone. Because that is all this is about now.

    Don’t get sidetracked. Don’t get tricked into debating defensively. Force the issue: the US government is trying to establish and normalize the practice of extraditing and imprisoning journalists for exposing its misdeeds. That is the issue to focus on.

    You will find that anyone who dares to stick their head above the parapet and smear Assange now gets very, very squirmy if you pin them down and force them to address this issue. Because they cannot answer without admitting that they are wrong. And that they’ve been wrong this entire time. It’s a completely unassailable argument.

    We now have two and a half months to prepare for the second half of Julian Assange’s extradition hearing: all of March, all of April, and half of May. We’re going to need all that time to seize control of the narrative and make it very, very clear to the world that a very important decision is about to be made by the powerful on our behalf, if we don’t make that decision for them.

    This really is do or die time, humans. If we allow them to extradite and imprison Julian Assange for practicing journalism, that’s it. It’s over. We might as well all stop caring what happens to the world and sit on our hands while the oligarchs drive us to ecological disaster, nuclear annihilation or authoritarian dystopia. It’s impossible to hold power accountable if you’re not even allowed to see what it’s doing.

    If we, the many, don’t have the spine to stand up against the few and say “No, we get to find out facts about you bastards and use it to inform our worldview, you don’t get to criminalize that,” then we certainly won’t have the spine it will take to wrest control of this world away from the hands of sociopathic plutocrats and take our fate into our own hands. 

    We are deciding, right now, what we are made of. And what we want to become.

    This is it. This is the part of the movie where we collectively choose the red pill or the blue pill. 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    We are collectively being asked a question here, and our answer to that question will determine the entire course we will take as a species.

    So what’s it going to be, humanity?

    Truth, or lies?

    Light, or darkness?

    A world where we can hold power to account with the light of truth, or a world where power decides what’s true for us?

    A world with free speech and a free press, or a world where journalists are imprisoned whenever they expose the evils of the most powerful institutions on this planet?

    A world where we all actively fight to free Assange and get the job done, or a giant, irreversible leap toward the end of humanity as we know it?

    Do we free Assange?

    Or do we sit complacent with our Netflix and our KFC and trust the authority figures to do what’s best?

    Do we take the red pill?

    Or do we take the blue one?

    Choose your path, humans.

    Choose wisely.

    *  *  *

    Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my website, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, checking out my podcast on either YoutubesoundcloudApple podcasts or Spotify, following me on Steemit, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypalpurchasing some of my sweet merchandise, buying my books Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone and Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.

    Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 22:15

  • 'Losing A Billion Dollars A Month' – No Rebound In Sight Amid Global Shipping Slump 
    ‘Losing A Billion Dollars A Month’ – No Rebound In Sight Amid Global Shipping Slump 

    America’s seaports are now starting to feel the chilling effects of supply chain disruptions from China, warned Noel Hacegaba, the Deputy Executive Director of Administration and Operations for the Port of Long Beach, California. 

    Hacegaba said the Port of Long Beach, the second-largest containerized port in the US – is experiencing weakness in volume, down 6% YoY in January, and down another 6% YoY in February. For the quarter, he said the port could see a decline of 12% YoY.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    He warned that economic paralysis in China has led to blank sails of containerships across shipping lanes between China and the US. 

    World Maritime News adds more color onto blank sailings and economic loss that is shocking the global shipping industry right down to the haul. 

    So far, 105 blank sailings between Asia to North America and Europe have been recorded from January 20 to February 10. The shuttering of dozens of manufacturing hubs in China for virus containment purposes has left the country’s factory output well below full capacity in February, and likely depressed into March.   

    Data from the UK-based maritime research consultancy, Drewry, said, “the cancellation of 105 sailings per month represents a shortfall in revenue of roughly USD 1 billion (105 x 10,000 TEU x USD 1,000), of which a portion will be made up later via full ships and extra loaders, but the short term damage to carrier profits is large.” 

    Drewry said port operations in China remained down 20 to 40% during the period. It said ports in the US are only now starting to feel the shock, which is what Hacegaba described last week was beginning at West Coast ports. 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Drewry warned that the plunge in container volume in China would severely weigh on global port volumes for the quarter: 

    “Cargo owners and shipping lines are desperate for a swift resolution that will see Chinese factories resume production and start churning out the goods and parts that grease the global supply chain. It is inevitable that world port throughput will suffer a large contraction in 1Q20, but the question is now whether we can expect a v-shaped recovery later this year or something else entirely?” 

    For some color on why container volumes in China and likely the rest of the world will collapse this quarter, we specifically outlined in semi-official data from China that business conditions are printing at depression levels (as a reminder, China has been responsible for 60% of the world’s credit creation in the last decade – if China’s catches the flu – so does everyone): 

    And for confirmation of China’s economic paralysis, China’s National Statistics Bureau reported Friday night the latest, February PMIs and they were absolutely catastrophic:

    • Manufacturing PMI crashed to 35.7 in Feb, far below the 45.0 consensus estimate, and sharply down from 50.0 in January. A record low.
    • Non-Manufacturing PMI plummets to 28.9, also far below the 50.5 consensus, estimate, and down nearly 50% from the 54.1 in Jan. This too was a record low.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Putting these numbers in context, the collapse in China’s economy will continue to weigh on global supply chains that are entirely dependent on the Asian country as a manufacturing source. 

    “Whatever the outcome, COVID-19 has exposed the fragility of global supply chains that are overly dependent on a single manufacturing source. We suspect that shippers will look to broaden their sourcing options as a form of insurance,” Drewry said.

    The nightmare scenario is that the virus outbreak shocks the world into recession as containerized volumes collapse along with trade growth would be devastating for the shipping industry: 

    “Under this scenario, we anticipate a prolonged downturn for freight rates and an elevated risk of a carrier bankruptcy. To avoid such a prospect, carriers would be forced to revisit the playbook from the financial crash of a decade before and undertake large scale capacity withdrawal in the form of mass idling and demolitions,” Drewry concludes.

    And for all those expecting that Beijing will unleash another massive stimulus to kick-start the economy at any cost, it seems that the likelihood of another round of massive stimulus appears low, which means markets are underestimating the scale of the growth slump. 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The outbreak in South Korea and Japan may be the next big concern for American ports, as creaking global supply chains has underlined the fragility of the global economy. 


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 21:50

  • "This Crisis Will Spill Over Into Disaster" – Dr.Doom Sees 40% Collapse In "Delusional" Stock Market
    “This Crisis Will Spill Over Into Disaster” – Dr.Doom Sees 40% Collapse In “Delusional” Stock Market

    “The Democratic field is poor, but Trump is dead. Quote me on that!”

    That’s Nouriel Roubini’s take on how the escalating global health crisis will morph into a financial crisis (it’s starting) and a political crisis…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    In an interview with Germany’s Der Speigel, Dr.Doom – who correctly predicted the bursting of the U.S. housing bubble in addition to the 2008 financial crisis along with the ramifications of austerity measures for debt-laden Greece – believes that coronavirus will lead to a global economic disaster and that U.S. President Donald Trump will not be re-elected as a result.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    DER SPIEGEL: How severe is the coronavirus outbreak for China and for the global economy?

    Roubini: This crisis is much more severe for China and the rest of the world than investors have expected for four reasons: First, it is not an epidemic limited to China, but a global pandemic. Second, it is far from being over. This has massive consequences, but politicians don’t realize it.

    DER SPIEGEL: What do you mean?

    Roubini: Just look at your continent. Europe is afraid of closing its borders, which is a huge mistake. In 2016, in response to the refugee crisis, Schengen was effectively suspended, but this is even worse. The Italian borders should be closed as soon as possible. The situation is much worse than 1 million refugees coming to Europe.

    DER SPIEGEL: What are your other two reasons?

    Roubini: Everyone believes it’s going to be a V-shaped recession, but people don’t know what they are talking about. They prefer to believe in miracles. It’s simple math: If the Chinese economy were to shrink by 2 percent in the first quarter, it would require growth of 8 percent in the final three quarters to reach the 6 percent annual growth rate that everyone had expected before the virus broke out. If growth is only 6 percent from the second quarter onwards, which is a more realistic scenario, we would see the Chinese economy only growing by 2.5 to 4 percent for the entire year. This rate would essentially mean a recession for China and a shock to the world.

    DER SPIEGEL: And your last point?

    Roubini: Everyone thinks that policymakers will react swiftly but that’s also wrong. The markets are completely delusional. Look at fiscal policy: You can do fiscal stuff only in some countries like Germany, because others like Italy don’t have any leeway. But even if you do something, the political process requires a great deal of talking and negotiating. It takes six to nine months, which is way too long. The truth is: Europe would have needed fiscal stimulus even without the corona crisis. Italy was already on the verge of a recession, as was Germany. But German politicians aren’t even thinking about stimulus, despite the country being so exposed to China. The political response is a joke – politicians are often behind the curve. This crisis will spill over and result in a disaster. 

    DER SPIEGEL: What role do the central banks have to play?

    Roubini: The European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan are already in negative territory. Of course, they could lower rates on deposits even further to stimulate borrowing but that wouldn’t help the markets for more than a week. This crisis is a supply shock that you can’t fight with monetary or fiscal policy.

    DER SPIEGEL: What will help?

    Roubini: The solution needs to be a medical one. Monetary and fiscal measures do not help when you have no food and water safety. If the shock leads to a global recession, then you have a financial crisis, because debt levels have gone up and the U.S. housing market is experiencing a bubble just like in 2007. It hasn’t been a time bomb so far because we have been experiencing growth. That is over now.

    DER SPIEGEL: Will this crisis change the way the Chinese people think of their government?

    Roubini: Businesspeople tell me that things in China are much worse than the government is officially reporting. A friend of mine in Shanghai has been locked in his home for weeks now. I don’t expect a revolution, but the government will need a scapegoat.

    DER SPIEGEL: Such as?

    Roubini: Already, there were conspiracy theories going around about foreign interference when it comes to swine flu, bird flu and the Hong Kong uprising. I assume that China will start trouble in Taiwan, Hong Kong or even Vietnam. They’ll crack down on protesters in Hong Kong or send fighters over Taiwanese air space to provoke the U.S. military. It would only take one accident in the Strait of Formosa and you would see military action. Not a hot war between China and the U.S., but some form of action. This is what people in the U.S. government like Secretary of State Mike Pompeo or Vice President Mike Pence want. It’s the mentality of many people in D.C.

    DER SPIEGEL: This crisis is obviously a setback for globalization. Do you think politicians like Trump, who want their companies to abandon production abroad, will benefit?

    Roubini: He will try to reap benefits from this crisis, that’s for sure. But everything will change when coronavirus reaches the U.S. You can’t build a wall in the sky. Look, I live in New York City and people there are hardly going to restaurants, cinemas or theaters, even though nobody there has been infected by the virus thus far. If it comes, we are totally fucked.

    DER SPIEGEL: A perfect scare-scenario for Trump?

    Roubini: Not at all. He will lose the election, that’s for sure.

    DER SPIEGEL: A bold prediction. What makes you so sure?

    Roubini: Because there is a significant risk of a war between the U.S. and Iran. The U.S. government wants regime change, and they will bomb the hell out of the Iranians. But Iranians are used to suffering, believe me, I am an Iranian Jew, and I know them! And the Iranians also want regime change in the U.S. The tensions will drive up oil prices and lead inevitably to Trumps defeat in the elections.

    DER SPIEGEL: What makes you so sure?

    Roubini: This has always the case in history. Ford lost to Carter after the 1973 oil shock, Carter lost to Reagan due to the second oil crisis in 1979, and Bush lost to Clinton after the Kuwait invasion. The Democratic field is poor, but Trump is dead. Quote me on that!

    DER SPIEGEL: A war against Iran is needed to beat Trump?

    Roubini: Absolutely, and it’s worth it. Four more years of Trump means economic war!

    DER SPIEGEL: What should investors do to brace for the impact?

    Roubini: I expect global equities to tank by 30 to 40 percent this year. My advice is: Put your money into cash and safe government bonds, like German bunds. They have negative rates, but so what? That just means that prices will rise and rise – you can make a lot of money that way. And if I am wrong and equities go up by 10 percent instead, that’s also OK. You have to hedge your money against a crash, that is more important. That’s my motto: “Better safe than sorry!”


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 21:25

  • WHO Encourages Adoption Of "Alternative Greetings" Like The "Elbow Tap" And "Foot Shake" To Fight Coronavirus
    WHO Encourages Adoption Of “Alternative Greetings” Like The “Elbow Tap” And “Foot Shake” To Fight Coronavirus

    As humanity struggles to “adapt” to the coronavirus outbreak, which has suddenly introduced a patina of sinister risk to mundane activities like greeting a friend or visiting the supermarket, the Yon Loo Lin School of Medicine has published a ‘new greetings’ guide to help people in virus-stricken communities learn new greetings like the “elbow tap”, “foot shake” and, of course, the “wave.”

    Dr. Sylvie Briand, the WHO’s director of epidemic and pandemic, tweeted a screenshot of what appears to be a new WHO guide to these ‘alternatives’ to the cheek-kiss and the handshake, popular greetings throughout the world.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    We’ve mentioned this issue a few times in recent days. Videos shared on Twitter suggest that the ‘foot shake’ is gaining popularity in Iran.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Walter Cotte, the regional director of the international federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent for America and the Caribbean, shared the guide on twitter.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    The final pane on the comic-format graphic encourages readers to develop their own greetings.

    Funny, we thought of one:


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 21:00

  • Lies, Damned Lies, & Presidential Debates: The Rhetoric And Reality Of Gun Control
    Lies, Damned Lies, & Presidential Debates: The Rhetoric And Reality Of Gun Control

    Authored by Jonathan Turley,

    There is a yawning chasm between the reality and rhetoric of gun control in light of promises in the Democratic primary. The fact is that many of the ideas raised by the candidates have merit but they are likely to be marginal in their impact on real gun-related fatalities.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The Democratic presidential debate down in South Carolina this week has proven once again the famous line that there are “lies, damned lies, and statistics.” The line is the perfect warning to the unwary about politicians citing statistics. The quote itself is widely misrepresented as the work of Mark Twain or British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, so it seems nothing can be trusted when it comes to statistics, not even quotes on statistics.

    Some false statistics, however, are so facially absurd that they are indeed harmless except to the most gullible. That was the case when former Vice President Joe Biden attacked Senator Bernie Sanders over a vote that had favored the gun industry. Biden declared that, since the vote, 150 million Americans have been killed by guns. He also said the vote happened in 2007, when it was actually in 2005. Many people immediately scratched their heads, thinking they may have missed a holocaust that had claimed roughly half the population. Later, the Biden campaign insisted it was just another one of his gaffes and the real number is 150,000 Americans.

    However, even that figure is wrong, but a Democratic primary is no place for the factually preoccupied. Trillions have been pledged for reparations, free college tuition, free medical care and free child care, all to be funded using math that would embarrass Bernie Madoff. First, on the threshold statistical controversy, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention claims that all gun deaths since 2007 total about 450,000. Thus, Biden went from overstating it by more than 300 times to understating it by three times. It is possible to get this figure down to around 180,000 by excluding the 60 percent of gun deaths that occur due to suicide.

    The much greater danger, however, is not the statistical but the legal misrepresentations on gun control, and those are not confined just to Biden. After all, cracking down on guns is one of the defining issues for former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who has pledged to “stop this nationwide madness.”

    In the debate, Biden dramatically glared into the camera to speak directly to the National Rifle Association: the NRA:

    “I want to tell you, if I’m elected NRA, I’m coming for you, and, gun manufacturers, I’m going to take you on and I’m going to beat you.”

    The other Democratic candidates have made similar claims that they will reduce gun violence significantly with executive orders and laws.

    Such statements are far more dishonest than the statistical flight of fancy promoted by Biden. Gun ownership is an individual constitutional right under the Second Amendment. A constitutional right cannot be reduced or changed by either executive order or legislation. You can only work on the margins of such exercises of constitutional rights, which belies the promise by Bloomberg that these measures would make an “enormous difference.”

    Elizabeth Warren declared that “we need a president willing to take executive action” to end gun violence without any explanation what she can do to limit an individual right, let alone do it unilaterally.

    It is true that, in the 2007 case of District of Columbia versus Dick Anthony Heller, the Supreme Court held that “like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited.” But like other constitutional rights such as the freedom of speech, legally imposed limits cannot deny the right itself but only place reasonable limits on its use. Thus, it may be possible to limit the size of ammunition magazines or such devices as bump stocks. Certainly, background checks would be allowed.

    Red flag laws allowing interventions are also likely to pass muster. But those limits are unlikely to “enormously” reduce gun violence. The vast majority of gun possessors, and many of those involved in massacres, would pass background checks. Indeed, there remains a serious question of whether states could outlaw weapons like AR-15s. Even if the Supreme Court upheld such a ban, there are over eight million AR-15s in private hands, and a wide variety of guns with equal or higher firepower.

    Then there is the problem that most gun deaths involve a single round fired by someone into themselves rather than into others. In 2017, six out of 10 gun deaths were suicides. Less than 40 percent were intentional murders, and the remaining gun deaths in the country were accidental or law enforcement shootings. While gun suicides reached their highest recorded level in 2017, nonsuicide deaths that involve guns have been declining and stand significantly lower from its high point in 1993.

    While the other candidates on the debate stage forced Sanders into a rare flip on his vote to protect gun manufacturers from lawsuits, it was another example of a misleading promise. I actually opposed the 2005 bill that protected gun manufacturers and sellers from lawsuits because it was unnecessary and because I generally oppose legislation that limits tort liability. The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, however, was not the sweeping immunity claimed by Biden and other candidates.

    It barred liability for injuries due to the fact that firearms were later used by criminals. The bill saved the industry some litigation costs, but the industry would have prevailed in such actions anyway if they were tried. Product liability and tort actions against manufacturers have uniformly and correctly been rejected by the courts. Guns are lawful products, and holding companies liable for later misuse of such products is absurd. You might as well sue an axe manufacturer for the Lizzy Borden murders.

    Thus, even if you remove immunity protections, ban certain magazines or devices, require background checks, or even ban a couple weapon types, the reduction in gun deaths would not likely fall significantly. Individuals still would have a constitutional right to possess guns. Moreover, the vast majority of guns would remain unaffected. That does not mean we should not try to reduce those fatalities or pass these measures. Any saved life is worth the effort. But candidates are misleading voters in suggesting that, if elected, they can dramatically impact the numbers of these cases.

    Of course, none of that would make for a memorable debate moment for any of the candidates. Biden would be less than riveting if he glared into the camera and poked a figurative National Rifle Association in the chest while saying he would take them on and “marginally reduce the minority of deaths associated with nonsuicidal gun incidents.”

    That is the reason why there are lies, damned lies, statistics, and presidential debates.

    *  *  *

    Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. You can follow him on Twitter @JonathanTurley.


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 20:35

  • Lisa Page Simmers After CPAC 'Lovebirds' Skit Mocks Infidelity, Bias
    Lisa Page Simmers After CPAC ‘Lovebirds’ Skit Mocks Infidelity, Bias

    Former FBI attorney Lisa Page is spitting mad after a dramatized reading of text messages between her and former FBI agent Peter Strzok was performed at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) near Washington.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Page and Strzok famously sent anti-Trump, pro-Clinton text messages to each other while they were spearheading separate investigations into each 2016 presidential candidate. The two were also having an affair at the time – which has resulted in President Trump frequently mocking their tryst at rallies with full-on theatrics.

    Here are highlights of stars Dean Cain and Kristy Swanson performing it in September (longer version here).

    And after a Washington Post Op-Ed revealed that President Trump met with the cast and crew of “FBI Lovebirds: Undercover” the day before CPAC, Page raged on Twitter – quoting the Post: “More than three years later, long after his election victory, Donald Trump is still obsessed with two officials who did their jobs while personally not liking him. They are still the stars of Trump rallies, where the president performs their exchanges, grotesquely.”

    Efforts to mock the pair arguably reached a new level at CPAC. The skit where the texts were dramatized was performed by actors Dean Cain, who once portrayed Superman on television, and Kristy Swanson, star of the 1992 film, “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.” The effort was written and produced by Phelim McAleer and Ann McElhinney.

    “We met the president of the United States today in the Oval Office for 40 minutes,” McElhinney told the conference during a Q&A session after a performance. “He loves the play.”

    He said he wants to play a part,” added Swanson. –Bloomberg

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Page raged on MSNBC last December, saying that Trump had performed a “vile, sort of simulated sex act” about her and Strzok.


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 20:10

  • Coronavirus Panic Is Causing A Worst-Case Scenario For Oil
    Coronavirus Panic Is Causing A Worst-Case Scenario For Oil

    Authored by Julianne Geiger via OilPrice.com,

    As the World Health Organization on Friday upgraded its global risk assessment for the coronavirus to “very high”, anxious oil markets are wondering when might be a good time to panic about the oil demand and its effect on inventories, investment dollars, and ultimately, oil prices.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Now could be as good of a time as any.

    Where We Stand

    So far, the coronavirus has infected more than 80,000 people worldwide, claiming nearly 3,000 lives. It has spread to 49 different countries in just a few short weeks, and continues to disrupt airline travel on a massive scale. In California, one possible case of community transmission reared its head—bringing awareness of what the virus can do to a whole new level.

    And make no mistake, there is more pain coming.  

    Already, COVID-19 is disrupting manufacturing and industrial output, specifically in China, and the FDA said this week that the world is experiencing its first drug shortage from these coronavirus-induced manufacturing disruptions.

    China’s massive oil refiners have felt the pain too, scaling back their petroleum products output, resulting in a big gaping hole in the demand side of the now precarious supply and demand equation for crude oil. Some suggest that China’s fuel demand now has a 4-million-barrel-per-day hole, and China’s imports of crude oil is expected to have dropped by 160,000 bpd in February. March may be worse, if Saudi’s oil exports to China next month are any indication.

    This decreased fuel demand has caused at least one trading arm of independent Chinese refiner Tianhong Chemical Co to go into receivership this week after feeling the coronavirus pinch. While this is just a single instance of an oil trader going under due unfavorable market conditions courtesy of COVID-19, the development is cause for alarm. Is this just the first of many in China’s independent oil arena to go under?

    This would spell disaster for China, and be painful for any of China’s many crude oil suppliers. After all, it is these independent refiners—the teapots—that have driven most of China’s oil import growth in recent years. Crude suppliers that would feel the pain of China’s refining industry meltdown would naturally be Russia, Saudi Arabia, Angola, and Iraq—who together represented 55% of all China’s crude oil imports as of 2018.

    Saudi Arabia, for example, typically ships between 1.8 million bpd and 2 million bpd, but already for March the Kingdom is cutting its oil exports to China by 500,000 bpd as refineries are throttling output. 

    But smaller suppliers, too, would be hit, particularly countries that ship most of their oil to China—countries like Iran, for example, which ships 50-70% of its oil to China.

    Where We’re Headed

    So things are bad, but surely the virus has run its course? 

    Nothing could be further from the truth. US health officials warned Americans this week to roll up their sleeves, pull up their bootstraps and settle in, because the coronavirus is on its way.

    “It’s not so much a question of if this will happen anymore but rather more of a question of exactly when this will happen,” Nancy Messonnier, director of the National center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases said in a press briefing this week.

    And if you want a preview of what’s to come, you only need to look at how major institutions such as the federal reserve are behaving.  

    The Federal Reserve and other central banks are expected to act soon—as early as this weekend—to staunch the market bleeding in the financial markets. The Fed’s have suggested that they will indeed cut rates “if” a global pandemic were to develop.

    About that “if” scenario, Moody’s Analytics yesterday suggested that the risk of the current coronavirus outbreak turning into a pandemic has actually doubled from 20% to 40%, calling their previous assumptions that COVID-19 would be contained to China as “optimistic”.

    This pandemic, Moody’s said, would result in a global recession during H1 2020.

    ““The economy was already fragile before the outbreak and vulnerable to anything that did not stick to script. COVID-19 is way off script,” Moody’s said.

    And Moody’s isn’t the only one who is rethinking their former optimism about the deadly virus.

    The IMF is likely to downgrade its global growth projections due to the virus, according to an IMF spokesperson on Thursday. And no doubt, because lethal viruses tend to scare people away from mingling among the potentially sick at places such as malls and other public areas—a situation that naturally lends itself to serious stifling of economic activity. And all that economic stifling will have a profound effect on industry, and industry in turn will have an effect on oil demand. 

    The IMF is now warning that there is the potential for greater economic fallout, and it is cutting its forecast for 2020 global growth by 0.1%.

    Rystad, too, stepped into the doom-spreader game on Friday, warning that the virus outbreak could cut oil and gas industry investments by $30 billion and could delay oil platform deliveries slated for Asia by three to six months. Those hit hardest would likely be shale operators in the US, and offshore E&P companies, according to Rystad. 

    Rystad doesn’t see the situation on the road to improvement. In fact, it sees the situation worsening in March, and affecting the entire global service industry.

    Overall, travel restrictions, reduced industrial throughput, people staying home because they’re scared—these factors have not peaked, and when they do, they will dent oil demand even further. Already WTI has sunk below $45, with Brent below $50. And OPEC may lack the fortitude to cut enough production to offset the major demand losses.

    It’s not out of the realm of possibility to suggest that more pain is on its way to the oil industry in the months that follow. The only question is, how painful will it be.


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 19:45

  • NY State Admits First Confirmed Covid-19 Case As Global Deaths Pass 3,000: Live Updates
    NY State Admits First Confirmed Covid-19 Case As Global Deaths Pass 3,000: Live Updates

    Summary:

    • Global virus deaths hit 3,000 as China reports another 42

    • NY State confirms 1st case of Covid-19

    • Rhode island announces “presumptive” case; patient recently visited Italy

    • Washington State confirms 2 more cases

    • 2 new cases confirmed in California

    • Israel case total hits 10 day before vote

    • South Korea death toll hits 22

    • Germany case total doubles in 24 hours to 129

    • Mexico case total climbs to 5

    • White House to hold meeting tomorrow with 8 pharma CEOs

    • Italy reports 42% jump in cases overnight to nearly 1,700

    • France reports 30 new cases, bringing total to 130

    • Czech Republic, Dominican Republic report first cases

    • Chinese health officials report first ‘double lung’ transplant connected to virus case

    • Iraq, Bahrain confirm 6 new cases; Lebanon confirms 3

    • 6 being tested in NYC for coronavirus

    • South Korea confirms 18th death, officials seek murder charges for founder of church at epicenter of outbreak

    • American Physical Society cancels major scientific conference

    • Juventus quarantines U23 squad

    • Iran death toll hits 54 as Trump offers aid

    • Thailand, Australia report first deaths

    • Spain case count hits 73; France hits 100

    • Independent scientist says it could have been spreading in WA for six weeks, with hundreds infected

    • Italian cases number more than 1,100; South Korea reports more than 3,700

    • Italian death toll hits 29

    • Luxembourg reports first cases, says it’s linked to Italy

    • UK cases rise to 35 as 12 new cases confirmed; 2 cases infected inside UK

    • UK health secretary says China-style lockdowns “an option”

    *  *  *

    Update (2025ET): A woman who recently traveled to Iran is New York’s first confirmed case of the novel coronavirus, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said on Sunday night.

    “There is no cause for surprise – this was expected,” the governor said in a statement.

    “I said from the beginning it was a matter of when, not if, there would be a positive case of novel coronavirus in New York.”

    The Wall Street Journal reports that the woman, who wasn’t named, is in her late 30s and contracted the virus while traveling abroad in Iran.

    *  *  *

    Update (1920ET): Global coronavirus deaths have surpassed 3,000 as China reports 42 new deaths on Sunday.

    • GLOBAL CORONAVIRUS DEATHS SURPASS 3,000 AS INFECTIONS SPREAD
    • CHINA REPORTS 202 ADDITIONAL CORONAVIRUS CASES MARCH 1
    • CHINA REPORTS 42 NEW CORONAVIRUS DEATHS MARCH 1

    3,000 – that’s roughly equivalent to the number of Americans who die every 2-3 weeks from drug overdoses.

    How much longer until we see 6,000?

    * * *

    Update (1915ET): The White House will host a meeting with 8 drug company CEOs to discuss “progress” on finding a coronavirus vaccine to stop COVID-19. The meeting will take place Monday afternoon.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    We suspect we’ll see a leak in the NYT, WaPo or CNN by 4:30.

    * * *

    Update (1900ET): South Korea’s Arirang News reports another death in South Korea, raising the death toll in the country to 22.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Meanwhile, over in Japan, PM Shinzo Abe said it’s imperative that Japan avert an outbreak in the country’s schools. This comes after Abe asked all schools across the country to close until further notice. Abe also said he’s looking into passing a law to enable a declaration of emergency, presumably to give his administration more leeway to act unilaterally.

    We’re glad that, after his administration’s previous mistakes with the handling of the ‘Diamond Princess’, they now recognize this is a priority.

    * * *

    Update (1800ET): Public health officials in Seattle and Washington State’s King County announced on Sunday that two more confirmed cases of the coronavirus had been confirmed, according to a local TV station.

    Additionally, ABC 7 reports that 2 Bay Area healthcare workers have received a “presumptive positive” from state labs.

    Alameda County Public Health Department and Solano Public Health are reporting that two health care workers are presumptive positive for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19); these cases are pending confirmatory testing from the CDC.

    Both cases are NorthBay VacaValley Hospital health care workers and are currently in home-isolation. One is a Solano County resident and the other is an Alameda County resident.

    They were both infected by the “unknown origin” case announced on Friday. They were discovered early, as part of investigators’ efforts to trace the individual’s contacts. Already, about 124 health care workers, including at least 36 nurses, are self-quarantining as we speak.

    The two patients both had exposure to the community-acquired case currently hospitalized at UC Davis Medical Center in Sacramento. The initial case is slowly recovering and the individual’s family members have negative test results so far and remain in quarantine, officials say.

    Alameda County has declared a state of emergency over the outbreak, joining San Francisco, which declared an emergency early last week. Washington Gov. Jay Inslee also declared a state of emergency on Saturday.

    “We understand that the evolving news about COVID-19 is concerning, and we are taking the situation very seriously,” said Dr. Erica Pan, Health Officer, Alameda County Public Health Department. “This news is not unexpected in the Bay Area, and we are ready for cases here. This is not the time to panic; now is the time for all of us to work together.” Dr. Pan said.

    In Washington, both new cases – a 70-year-old resident and 40-year-old employee – were from a Kirkland, WA. nursing home called Life Care Center of Kirkland (we suspect they’ll be seeing some negative Yelp! reviews in the  near future). Johns Hopkins put the US case total at 76 Sunday night, but it’s unclear how many of the cases reported this weekend have been officially ‘confirmed’ and added to their total. Across the world, more than 80,000 have been infected.

    According to state public-health officials, additional 27 residents of the nursing home and 25 staff members are reporting symptoms of the virus, which can be similar to that of the common flu.

    These two new cases bring the total number of confirmed cases in the county to six. Since the outbreak began, 8 cases have been confirmed in the state.

    Fox confirmed that the two new cases are:

    • A man in his 60s, hospitalized at Valley Medical Center in Renton. The man has underlying health conditions, and is in critical but stable condition.
    • A man in 60s, hospitalized at Virginia Mason Medical Center in Seattle. The man has underlying health conditions, and his status is critical.

    And the four prior cases (including one who passed away) that we already reported include:

    • A woman in her 50s, who had traveled to South Korea, recovering at home
    • A woman in her 70s, who was a resident of LifeCare in Kirkland, hospitalized at EvergreenHealth
    • A woman in her 40s, employed by LifeCare, who is hospitalized at Overlake Medical Center
    • A man in his 50s, who was hospitalized and died at EvergreenHealth

    One of these women is an employee of the US Postal Service, the Washington Examiner reports. Though her position didn’t directly require her to handle mail, she had contact with others who did handle mail.

    Scientists can’t say anything for certain about the virus and its ability to live on surfaces, but given its relation to other coronaviruses like SARS and MERS, it’s possible that the virus could survive on surfaces for up to 9 days.

    The LifeCare nursing home facility has been closed until further notice. Several nursing students from the Lake Washington Institute of Technology who reportedly visited the LifeCare nursing facility last wee are also being ‘closely monitored’, along with all 110 residents and 180 LifeCare employees.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Despite all the nearby infections – and a rash of cancellations affecting states and countries with no confirmed cases – the Emerald City ComicCon, which is two weeks away, will proceed as scheduled, according to organizers.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Members of the Washington State press corps have been sharing an estimate from another viral disease expert named Mike Baker, who said there could be as many as 1,500 people infected in Washington State since mid-January.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    In other news, ahead of Monday’s big vote, Israel has confirmed three more cases of coronavirus, bringing its total number to 10. Two of the new cases had recently returned from a trip to Italy, and the third is thought to have been infected within Israel. Mexico have confirmed a fifth case of the virus – an 18-year-old woman who had been studying in Milan and had recently returned to Chiapas state. The number of cases in Germany has doubled in one day on Sunday, from 66 to 129.

    * * *

    Update (1530ET): President Trump hasn’t tweeted much so far today, but minutes he go, he broke his silence to highlight a New York Post poll showing a majority of Americans “have confidence in their government’s ability to contain the coronavirus.”

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    * * *

    Update (1500ET): Chinese health officials reported that a patient in serious condition has undergone a “double-lung transplant” in the city of Wuxi. Even after testing negative for the virus, the 59-year-old patient’s lungs failed to recover, so doctors decided to go ahead with the transplant.

    * * *

    Update (1330ET): French health officials have confirmed another 30 cases on Sunday, bringing France’s total to 130.

    Meanwhile, the list of countries confirming their first cases of the virus on Sunday continues to grow: The Czech Republic and Dominican Republic each have confirmed their first cases, joining Australia and Luxembourg.

    The Czech Republic has actually confirmed three cases on Sunday, according to Health Minister Adam Vojtech.

    Qatar has reported 2 new cases, bringing its total to 3, while Iraq just reported six new cases.

    Iraq reported six new coronavirus cases, bringing the total number to 19. Two of the newly confirmed cases were in Baghdad, the other four were in Sulaimaniya.  All cases in the country are travelers who just returned from Iran.

    Bahrain also confirmed six new cases: five Bahraini citizens, and a Saudi national who traveled on an “indirect” flight routed to Iran.

    Earlier, Lebanon confirmed 3 new cases, bringing its total to 10.

    Though it hasn’t confirmed any cases yet, Morocco is set to postpone sports and cultural events over coronavirus fears, the government health committee has announced.

    Meanwhile, Global Times editor Hu Xijin tweeted that Europe and the US will eventually have to accept the coronavirus, arguing that “if the epidemic emerges repeatedly, it would have a “profound impact.”

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    What about China?

    * * *

    Update (1230ET): Italian health authorities have reported more than 500 new coronavirus cases, bringing Italy’s total to 1,694, a 42% surge overnight, and raising the death toll to 34, the second-highest outside mainland China (after Iran).

    Despite reporting less than half of the number of cases confirmed in South Korea, Italy has recorded significantly more deaths, suggesting that the virus is much more widespread than officials realize.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Meanwhile, NBC News reports that 2 more people in New York City are being tested for the coronavirus, according to the Department of Health. Since yesterday, another suspected cases was deemed negative, bringing the total of negative cases in NYC to nine so far.

    * * *

    If there’s one thing we’ve learned since the coronavirus outbreak went global in January, it’s that a lot can change in 24 hours. Seemingly overnight, the viral hysteria has apparently arrived in the US, alongside the news of the first virus-related death in Washington State.

    Hoarding has already begun. President Trump has issued “do not travel” warnings affecting ‘hot zones’ in Italy and South Korea. In Italy, the Level 4 State Department advisory affects the hardest-hit provinces of Lombardy and Veneto, where ‘community transmission’ has already been confirmed.

    In South Korea, it affects the city of Daegu. In Europe, France and Switzerland have banned large gatherings over 5,000, and cancelled all sporting events. Games, events and conferences across the world have been cancelled as airlines continue to cut back on routes, with the focus turning to Italy and South Korea.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Adding to the growing list of cancellations, the American Physical Society has cancelled one of the world’s major international scientific conferences just a day before it was supposed to begin.

    In South Korea, Samsung announced that a worker at its smartphone plant in Gumi had contracted the virus. The pace of newly confirmed cases is growing so rapid, it’s becoming difficult to keep up: The number of confirmed cases worldwide has reached nearly 87,000, with more than 7,000 cases outside mainland China. The virus has now been detected in at least 60 countries and/or territories. South Korea remains home to the biggest outbreak outside of China with more than half of all cases outside the mainland. As of Sunday afternoon in Rome, Italian health authorities had reported 1,128 cases, while the death toll climbed to 29, according to Al Jazeera.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    As frustration against a strange cult-like church at the center of the country’s outbreak intensifies, officials are pushing for the leaders of a church at the center of the country’s outbreak be investigated on murder charges as the country’s death toll hit 18.

    With 71 cases confirmed in the US (73 if you count the “presumptive” case announced by Illinois public health officials late last night and a new case in Rhode Island), the outbreak has spread much more quickly than most Americans had realized, though we should also point out that the bulk of these cases were already quarantined when they were confirmed, since they were evacuees from either the ‘Diamond Princess’, or ‘Wuhan’.

    Perhaps the most shocking news out of Italy on Sunday was that Juventus, the Serie A soccer club based in the northern city of Turin, has quarantined its entire under-23 squad after 3 players on an opposing team and their coach tested positive for the virus. The team has also cancelled training and suspended matches, including amatch against Inter Milan, a team that recently played a match before an empty stadium has been postponed.

    According to the Daily Mail, the Serie A outfit announced the decision after their youth team played Serie C Pianese, a team that has seen three players and a manager test positive for the virus, causing an uproar in European soccer.

    Following President Trump’s Saturday press conference, where he and Vice President Mike Pence acknowledged the virus coronavirus-related death outside Seattle in Washington State (note: the deceased was identified as a male, following earlier inaccurate reports claiming the victim was female), the president attended CPAC’s annual conference, where he claimed during his keynote address that the US would be willing to help the Iranians contain their brutal outbreak, the NYT reports. Officials in Washington State fear the virus may have been circulating in the state for weeks.

    “If we can help the Iranians, we have the greatest health care professionals in the world,” he said, adding that “we would love to be able to help them.”

    “All they have to do is ask,” he said.

    Trevor Bedford, a cancer researcher, claimed that the virus may have been spreading in Washington for as long as six weeks, and said that hundreds of people may already be infected.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Over in Iran, officials said the total number of confirmed cases had climbed to 978, with 54 confirmed deaths, just days after government officials denied reports that 50 had died in the city of Qom. Recently, the BBC reported that the true death toll has already surpassed 200.

    Hoping to quell the growing sense of panic following a brutal week for US stocks, Trump appealed to the press and politicians in Washington to “not do anything to incite a panic” during his press conference, where he also said he was ‘considering’ closing the southern border, a remark that elicited a frustrated response from the Mexican foreign ministry.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Courtesy of NYT

    During separate Sunday appearances on Fox News, HHS Secretary Alex Azar said 75,000 test kits are now available to detected cases of the virus, while VP Pence said a vaccine won’t be available this season (some experts are saying it won’t be ready for next season, either). More cases are expected, Azar said, adding that “we don’t know where this will go,” as public health officials in Washington, California, Oregon, Illinois and Rhode Island scramble to trace the contacts and movements of the newest cases.

    About 90 minutes ago, public health officials in Rhode Island announced the state’s first “presumptive” case of the virus, reporting that the individual is in their 40s and recently returned from a trip to Italy in mid-February, before the outbreak in that country had accelerated, Boston 25 News reports. That’s a relief: The clear path of origin means that the latest American patient isn’t another case of “unknown origin”. Health officials are still assuming the worst: That the lack of a clear source of transmission for at least 4 American patients indicates that potentially dozens of others might also be infected, even if they aren’t yet exhibiting symptoms.

    After emerging as a model of outbreak suppression, Thailand reported its first virus-linked death on Sunday.

    Elsewhere, Australia, a country with only 25 confirmed cases (several from the ‘Diamond Princes’), has reported its first COVID-19-linked death: An elderly man from the remote city of Perth who had traveled aboard the Diamond Princess became the first Australian to die from the virus. The 78-year-old man and his 79-year-old wife were among the 164 Australians who traveled aboard the ‘Diamond Princess’. According to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, the elderly couple were initially flown to Howard Springs in the Northern Territory where Australia’s Diamond Princess evacuees were sent.

    Speaking of the Diamond Princess, Japan’s Health and Labor Minister Katsunobu Kato said Sunday that the last passengers and crew, including the captain, had disembarked on Sunday.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    While Italy remains the uncontested epicenter of the outbreak in Europe, twelve more people have tested positive for the virus in the UK, including a second case of an individual believed to have caught the virus inside the country, bringing the total to 35. Health officials are trying to trace a 35-year-old man from Shenzhen who had reportedly been working in Bristol, the Guardian reports.

     

    During an appearance on the Andrew Marr, the UK’s premier political talk show, on Sunday, UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock confirmed that the NHS is bringing doctors out of retirement to fight a potential outbreak, before adding that the UK is leaving the option of China-style, city-wide lockdowns on the table, saying the government needs to consider all available tools:

    Marr asked Hancock: “China, of course, isolated entire cities. Is it conceivable under any circumstance, you try and cut off the city in this country?”

    Hancock replied: “There’s clearly a huge economic and social downside to that. But we don’t take anything off the table at this stage, because you’ve got to make sure that you have all the tools available, if that is what’s necessary. But I want to minimise the social and economic disruption.”

    As of Sunday, Spain has confirmed 73 cases, according to Fernando Simón, the head of the country’s Center for the Coordination of Health Emergencies and Alerts. He added that 90% of the cases were imported or related to imported cases of the virus.

    In France, which has reported 100 cases, the Louvre Museum closed on Sunday, and said it would remain shut as workers objected to the risk of catching the virus while working among the millions of visitors who pass through the museum, the AP reports.

    Around 300 Louvre staff met Sunday morning and voted “almost unanimously” not to open, according to Christian Galani of the CGT labor union, who spoke with AFP.

    Luxembourg has reported its first case, a traveler who recently returned from Italy. Health Minister Paulette Lenert told reporters the patient is a man in his 40s, per Al Jazeera.

    As Brazil confirms a second case, international health authorities pointed out that the fact Africa has only reported 3 cases so far, one in Egypt, one in Algeria and one in Nigeria, is something of a miracle, even as the Nigerians have identified 100 people who may have come into contact with the sick individual, as France 24 reports.

    Finally, we’d like to leave readers with a glimpse of levity before we go: We’d like to draw readers’ attention to the front page of the Saturday Star, a Canadian daily. 

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    You know it’s bad when the Canadian newspaper editors start whipping out the Wayne Gretzky comparisons.


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 19:26

  • Goldman Now Sees 2 Rate Cuts In Next 2 Weeks, Expects "Coordinated" Central Bank Easing
    Goldman Now Sees 2 Rate Cuts In Next 2 Weeks, Expects “Coordinated” Central Bank Easing

    It was just Friday that Goldman finally gave up on its bizarrely optimistic global outlook that it had adopted in late 2019, and instead of seeing no rate cuts – or hikes – in 2020, the bank’s chief economist Jan Hatzius capitulated, and said that the Fed will likely cut at least three times in the first half to offset the global economic slowdown due to the coronavirus, late on Sunday, just 48 hours after its first rate forecast revision, Goldman has officially thrown in the towel on even a trace of optimism for the foreseeable future, and now expects not only the Fed to cut 4 times by the end of Q2, but also cautions of a a high risk that the easing it expects over the next several weeks could occur “in coordinated fashion, perhaps as early as the coming week“, which of course is disappointing for all those who were hoping the Fed would step in as soon as Sunday afternoon/evening.

    In justifying the implosion of its outlook, Haztius writes that “on Friday morning, we downgraded our baseline view of global GDP growth in 2020 from just over 3% to around 2% on the back of developments related to the coronavirus, with weakness concentrated in the first half of the year. We also changed our Fed call to project 75bp of rate cuts by June, starting with a 25bp cut on March 18.

    This was on Friday morning. Since then, so over the weekend, it appears that newsflow has taken a decided turn for the worse, and as Goldman adds, “the news on the outlook has remained negative, with significant further increases in infections outside of China and an exceptionally weak China PMI release. Moreover, the statement by Fed Chair Powell on Friday afternoon that the Federal Reserve is “closely monitoring” developments and “will use [its] tools and act as needed to support the economy” strongly hints at a rate cut at or even before the March 17-18 FOMC meeting.”

    Based on these developments, Goldman is making further adjustment to its Fed call and now projects a 50bp rate cut by March 18 followed by another 50bp of easing in Q2, for a total of 100bp in the first half. Which means that the US Fed Funds rate will be just above zero as the US enters the second half, and has a high chance of tipping negative around the time of the election. Hatzius explains:

    The clear signal in Chair Powell’s statement has led the bond market to price in more than 25bp of easing, and the FOMC will not want the cut to come as a disappointment in the present situation.

    But wait, there’s more: Goldman is now also forecasting rate cuts by most other G10 (and some EM) central banks, including a cumulative 100bp of cuts in Canada, 50bp in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Norway, India and South Korea, and 10bp in the Euro area and Switzerland. The chart below shows Goldman’s new central bank forecasts along with market pricing as of Friday’s close.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    So does 4 rate cuts seem excessive? Not at all, and in fact Goldman even says that relative to some of its new policy rate forecasts, “the risk is on the downside, at least in terms of timing.”

    Specifically, we see a high risk that the easing we expect over the next several weeks occurs in coordinated fashion, perhaps as early as the coming week. Chair Powell’s statement on Friday suggests to us that global central bankers are intensely focused on the downside risks from the virus. We suspect that they view the impact of a coordinated move on confidence as greater than the sum of the impacts of each individual move. If a coordinated move does occur, we think some central banks for which we are projecting a first 25bp cut in our new baseline forecast may well join the Fed in cutting by 50bp. This might apply to New Zealand and—if the move occurs very soon—Australia. While it is a close call, our baseline is that the UK and Canada will both cut the policy rate by 50bp at their next meetings, even if a coordinated move does not occur very soon.

    Finally to all those who point out the obvious, namely that monetary policy is ill-suited to address the impact of
    the virus on the economy, and that it is really public health policy (and fiscal policy more broadly) that needs to act, Goldman agrees “but thinks that central bankers will still want to do their part” to support what Goldman erroneous calls the economy, when it clearly means the market, especially since there is not a trace yet of the US economy being impacted by the coronavirus, and last time we checked, the Fed is not a pre-cog cutting rates in advance of data developments. And while that obvious, what the Fed does do, is cut when stocks tumble, as they have now, and with the world habituated to a central bank bailout any time there is even a modest, 10% correction, this will be the first time we have a global coordinated central bank action in response to… the flu.

     


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 19:20

  • Coronavirus: A Great Opportunity For Dems To Attack Trump?
    Coronavirus: A Great Opportunity For Dems To Attack Trump?

    Authored by Lorraine Silvetz via LibertyNation.com,

    As Coronavirus continues to make its way around the world, sickening and killing thousands, the U.S. government’s response to the crisis has become riddled with dissension between President Trump and the Democrats.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Trump requested $2.5 billion in funding from Congress to deal with the outbreak. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), however, said that amount was too little as he put down the administration’s preparedness for a disease federal officials say could cause “severe” disruption to everyday life in the U.S.

    “With no plan to deal with the potential public and global health crisis related to the novel coronavirus, the Trump administration made an emergency supplemental appropriations request on Monday,” Schumer said in a statement on Feb. 26.

    It was too little and too late — only $1.25 billion in new funding. For context, Congress appropriated more than $6B for the Pandemic Flu in 2006 and more than $7B for H1N1 flu in 2009.”

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Donald Trump and Mike Pence

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) also insulted the president’s funding request, calling it “completely inadequate” and criticized the president for previously cutting funding to public health programs. She called the response “anemic.”

    After Trump tapped Vice President Mike Pence to lead the Coronavirus response in the U.S.,  Democrats, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), attacked Pence for his handling of HIV while still the governor of Indiana. True to form, in the words of Obama’s former Chief of Staff, Rahm Emmanuel, Democrats “never let a good crisis go to waste.”

    “As governor, Pence’s science denial contributed to one of the worst HIV outbreaks in Indiana’s history,” AOC tweeted.

    “He is not a medical doctor. He is not a health expert. He is not qualified nor positioned in any way to protect our public health.”

    Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Thursday said she spoke with Pence and voiced her concerns regarding Trump’s choosing him to spearhead the Coronavirus initiative. “We have always had a very candid relationship and, I expressed to him a concern that I had of his being in this position,” she said at her weekly press conference on Capitol Hill.

    At Trump’s announcement of his position on Wednesday, Pence said his time serving as governor provided valuable training for this.

     “I know full well the importance of presidential leadership, the importance of administration leadership, and the vital role of partnerships of state and local governments, and health authorities in responding to potential threats and dangerous infectious diseases,” the vice president said.

    Pence announced the appointment of Debbie Birx, a medical doctor and HIV and global health expert, as the “White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator.” She had previously been appointed by President Obama to the position of U.S. Global AIDS coordinator and confirmed by the Senate.

    Presidential candidates didn’t hesitate to jump on the Coronavirus bandwagon declaring how they would respond to the outbreak.

    “Like so much else, the Trump administration’s bungled response to the coronavirus outbreak is a mess,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) tweeted. 

    “As president, I will lead a competent administration prepared to combat outbreaks—because our public health, economy, and national security depend on it.”

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Mike Bloomberg

    Former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg also joined the clamor of Trump insults regarding his approach to the coronavirus.

    “I led NYC through its recovery after 9/11 and the financial crisis,” the billionaire tweeted Wednesday.

    We faced health epidemics and weather emergencies. The key to leading in a crisis like the coronavirus is sharing the facts, demonstrating control and trusting the experts. Unfortunately, not Trump’s strong suit.”

    Trump said that Democrats and the media are playing up the Coronavirus threat for political gain, as he sought to ease fears about the virus this week both in his Wednesday press conference and in public appearances during his trip to India and on Twitter.

    And it turns out the majority of Americans have faith in Trump to handle it…

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    It is clear that the jury’s still out regarding how malignant Coronavirus will be both in the U.S. and around the world. Some experts estimate the mortality rate is 20 times higher than that of the seasonal flu. And while the seasonal flu kills roughly 35,000 Americans a year, if the coronavirus infects half the U.S. population, the 2% mortality rate still means 3.3 million American lives lost. Is Trump being misled by some of his advisors as to the magnitude of the coronavirus threat?


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 18:55

  • Watch: SpaceX's "Starship" Explodes On Launch Pad During Routine Pressurization Test
    Watch: SpaceX’s “Starship” Explodes On Launch Pad During Routine Pressurization Test

    When the world first caught a glance of SpaceX’s “Starship” super rocket, many joked about it looking like an abandoned grain silo wrapped in tin foil. 

    OK, we admit. That was mostly us joking that it looked like an abandoned grain silo wrapped in tin foil. But look at it…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Now it turns out that had it actually been an abandoned grain silo, it may have performed better during SpaceX’s pressure test of the “vehicle” that was held right before the weekend. 

    Instead, the product of Elon Musk innovation wound up blowing up on the launch pad at the company’s South Texas facility, after being tested for pressure with inert liquid nitrogen. The photographs from the morning after show the extent of the damage on the rocket, which we’re certain will not be reused. 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Initial reports claim that the tank may have suffered a structural failure during pressurization and information about injuries and the extent of the damage was not readily available from SpaceX. The protoype ship was designed only for an “initial round of tests”, according to Yahoo News, who said that future prototypes would be used for more ambitious tests.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    But judging by the streaming video of this test, SpaceX has a long way to go. Next Spaceflight’s Michael Baylor  said on Twitter:

    “Test, fail, fix, test, fail, fix is SpaceX’s game. They will learn from it and get it right.”

    Streaming video caught the Starship N1 tank popping and imploding as the ship flew into the air, before crashing back down to Earth. 

    Social media skeptics of Elon Musk couldn’t help but say “I told you so”. We wonder if Tesla skeptics will have a similar day at some point soon.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

     


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 18:30

  • Trump Warns "Dems Taking Bernie Out Of Play" After Buttigieg Quits Democratic Presidential Race
    Trump Warns “Dems Taking Bernie Out Of Play” After Buttigieg Quits Democratic Presidential Race

    Update (1845ET): It didn’t take long for President Trump to chime on Mayor Pete’s exit, warning that “This is the REAL beginning of the Dems taking Bernie out of play”

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    *  *  *

    One day after billionaire Tom Steyer dropped out of the presidential race after spending hundreds of millions on a very expensive ego trip, mayor Pete is also officially out after his dismal performance in South Carolina.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    For a brief few moments after his narrow victory in the Iowa caucus, things looked good for the first openly gay major presidential candidate, but since then things have slumped and following a crushing loss in the South Carolina primary where his poor performance with black Democrats signaled an inability to build a broad coalition of voters, he has reportedly decided to pull the plug.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Buttigieg is on his way to South Bend where he will reportedly make the announcement later tonight (likely on his way to CNN, following Yang to become a ‘talking head’ commentator on the debacle ahead).

    Buttigieg’s exit comes a day after billionaire Tom Steyer ended his campaign after paying the price for focussing far too much of his campaign on climate change, instead of addressing issues people care about.

    Mayor Pete had collapsed in the odds already but not as fats as Mike Bloomberg has since the first debate (and the second debate did nothing for him).

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Biden’s rebound is of note, but Bernie remains the bookies’ favorite, but the real question is will Mike Bloomberg quit too after a surprisingly strong performance by Biden amid accusations mini Mike will steal from Biden’s centrist base if he does not quit before Super Tuesday.

    What is perhaps just as worrying is the fact that with Buttigieg out, Hillary is now #4 in the odds…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    As NYTimes notes, in the last presidential debate, on Tuesday in South Carolina, Mr. Buttigieg forcefully warned that nominating Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, the front-runner, would lead to crushing defeat in the fall, not just “four more years of Donald Trump,’’ but the loss of the Democratic House majority secured by moderate candidates who won in suburban swing districts in 2018.

    It would appear that thesis is about to be tested… but of course, after Tuesday everything will change.


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 18:16

  • Coronageddon: Can A "Minsky Moment" Be Avoided?
    Coronageddon: Can A “Minsky Moment” Be Avoided?

    Authored by Mike Whitney via The Unz Review,

    There’s a chance that the coronavirus will be contained in the United States and that fewer people will be infected than in China or Iran. But there’s also a possibility that the highly-contagious virus will spread and that there will be sporadic outbreaks across the country.

    If this latter scenario takes place, then the ructions in the stock market will intensify making it impossible to form a bottom or spark a relief rally.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    If stocks can’t find a bottom, then pressure will build on the weak players, who purchased securities with borrowed cash, to sell their good assets along with the bad in order to repay their debts. These massive selloffs can quickly turn into firesales where it’s nearly impossible to find a buyer regardless of price. This is what the financial media calls “panic selling”, a vicious, self-reinforcing downward spiral in which stock prices collapse in a frantic, disorderly selloff. The phenomenon has also been described by Pimco’s Paul McCulley as a “Minsky Moment”. Here’s a definition from Investopedia:

    “Minsky Moment crises generally occur because investors, engaging in excessively aggressive speculation, take on additional credit risk during prosperous times, or bull markets. The longer a bull market lasts, the more investors borrow to try and capitalize on market moves. Minsky Moment defines the tipping point when speculative activity reaches an extreme that is unsustainable, leading to rapid price deflation and unpreventable market collapse. What follows, as hypothesized by Hyman Minsky, is a prolonged period of instability.” (Investopedia)

    So, how close are we to a Minsky Moment?

    In the last week alone, US stocks have shed $3.6 trillion in market value while benchmark 10-year Treasury yields have dropped to all-time lows and the ominously-named “fear gauge” or VIX (Volatility Index) has spiked to levels not seen in more than two years. The losses have been savage and severe, but the credit markets have held up fairly well so far. Next week could be a different matter altogether though, after all, there’s only so much fat on the bone. Another week like last week, would lead to widening credit spreads, major dislocations in the corporate bond market and, very likely, a few sizable defaults. Over-extended corporations that have borrowed over a trillion dollars from Mom and Pop investors to buy back their own shares, would certainly face a day of reckoning as their cash flow vanishes overnight and their prospects for rolling over their prodigious pile of debt drops to zero. This is typically how credit cycles end, in a fetid cloud of blood and smoke.

    Despite persistent warnings from the IMF and other establishment institutions, Central Banks have done nothing to curtail the 11-year orgy of debt-fueled spending or the rampant reckless speculation that has sent stock prices through the roof even while workers wages have remained flat and standards of living have continued to slip. For more than a decade the Fed has kept interest rates locked on their emergency setting while pumping trillions in liquidity into the financial system at the first sign of trouble. So now stocks are the biggest bubble in history and the Fed finds itself without the tools it needs to counter the effects of the coronavirus. This has all the makings of a major catastrophe.

    So how does this end?

    Well, next week the Fed will announce that it is slashing rates by 50 basis points and that it’s coordinating its action with its fellow central banks, the BoE, the BoJ, and the ECB. The Fed might also announce an additional liquidity program aimed at banks and financial institutions that suddenly find they themselves unable to borrow at the Fed’s discount rate. The announcement could ignite a relief rally, but the surge is not likely to last long since it will not have any material effect on either the virus or the disruptions to supply-lines. The Fed’s easy money will not create the Chinese-made components that laptop manufacturers need to sell their products. They won’t put skittish workers back in the factories or passengers back on airplanes or consumers back in the retail stores. The Fed’s low rates are designed to stimulate demand, but they do nothing to mitigate a “supply shock”. Regrettably, the problem is on the supply side not the demand side.

    For a better understanding of how the coronavirus is roiling markets, I’ve transcribed a short interview with market analyst Mohamed El-Erian who explains recent developments and provides a window into the future. El-Erian sees the current drama unfolding in four phases.

    Mohamed El-Erian — “Phase one, is the economic and corporate shock. Global growth slows, companies generate less earnings, their costs go up, and their supply chains get disrupted.” (This is already happening.)

    “Phase two is financial disruptions. Now we will see pockets of illiquidity, pockets of distress selling, market dislocations, and a complete closure of markets for any kind of funding other than bank funding. These two phases feed onto each other.” (This is also happening now.)

    “Phase three, the formation of a bottom which happens in finance first, then in the economy. But for that to happen, it’s not about central banks like a financial sudden stop. It’s about addressing the underlying issue, which is the virus.” (No bottom in sight.)

    “Phase four, when we have to look at the longer-term (scare? inaudible) Central banks realize whatever they do, will be shown to be ineffective and the faith that investors have always had that central banks can bolster valuations, is going out the window…..The Fed will cut rates because markets will begin to dysfunction, but (rate cuts) will not deliver a better economic outcome.”

    “The problem is…you need the fundamentals to stop deteriorating in order to form a bottom. But the “technicals” can not stabilize long enough to form a bottom in the face of the continuously negative news. …What we need is hope, realistic hope that we have a way to solve this issue, and a vaccine is the best way to do that but that’s not coming anytime soon.” (No vaccine, no remedy.)

    Bloomberg –“Is this selloff still orderly?”

    “It was until yesterday (Friday afternoon) but now we’re starting to see the things you typically see when too many people are trying to reposition themselves and their isn’t enough risk-taking capacity in the middle. So we are seeing massive price gaps, very little liquidity in certain sectors of the corporate bond markets and emerging markets, and finally people are realizing what you and I have talked about for a long time. They took on too much liquidity risk.” (Watch the whole interview on: “Mohamed El-Erian Breaks Down Coronavirus Impact Into Four Stages”, Bloomberg News)

    This interview will help readers understand how hard it’s going to be to calm the markets and stop the downward slide. There are four points that need to be emphasized:

    1– In order to turn markets around, a bottom must be formed. Unfortunately, forming a bottom is impossible when stocks are whipsawed every few hours by more bleak information. In short, the news cycle is driving stocks lower.

    2– On Friday signs of distress began to appear as a result of the the 5-day Wall Street bloodbath. (“Financial disruptions, pockets of illiquidity, pockets of distress selling, market dislocations, and a complete closure of markets for any kind of funding other than bank funding.) These are the red flags signalling a Minsky Moment is approaching, that is, when speculative activity reaches a tipping point leading to “rapid price deflation and unpreventable market collapse”..followed by “a prolonged period of instability.” In short, a stock market crash.

    3– “Markets will begin to dysfunction, but (rate cuts) will not deliver a better economic outcome.”
    In other words, Wall Street is demanding lower rates, but lower rates won’t help, in fact, they will further undermine the Fed’s credibility.

    4– Finally , what’s needed to stop the selloff is a vaccine. Regrettably, there probably won’t be a vaccine for another 12 to 18 months. By that time, Wall Street could be a pile of smoldering rubble.


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 18:05

  • "It's A Betrayal" – ICE Runs Millions Of Facial-Recognition Searches On Maryland Drivers
    “It’s A Betrayal” – ICE Runs Millions Of Facial-Recognition Searches On Maryland Drivers

    The real-world use of facial-recognition technology in the justice system is fraught with problems, according to a new report from The Baltimore Sun

    New evidence suggests the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has accessed the Maryland state database of licensed drivers numerous times in the last several years, using facial-recognition software to scan millions of licenses without state or court approval.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The move by ICE has alarmed immigration activists in the state, alleging that the agency has used the database to scan for undocumented immigrants that have received a special driver’s license in the last seven years.

    ICE can take a photograph of an unknown person and run it through the database, in search of a match. 

    “It’s a betrayal of immigrants’ trust for the [state] to turn around and let ICE run warrantless searches on their faces,” said Harrison Rudolph, a senior associate at Georgetown University Law School’s Center on Privacy and Technology. It’s a bait-and-switch. … ICE is using biometric information in the shadows, without government notice or public approval, to hunt down the most vulnerable people.”

    A new bill backed by state Democrats would force ICE agents to obtain a warrant before running images through the motor vehicle records and driver’s license database. The bill would also allow the state to track federal queries into the system. 

    ICE has used the database to scan for undocumented immigrants, mainly in the Baltimore–Washington metropolitan area. 

    “We have seen certain cases where they didn’t have any sort of criminal record but were targeted,” said Lydia Walther-Rodriguez, operations head of Baltimore CASA. 

    Rodriguez said ICE has used the database to search for immigrants “for years now.” 

    The Washington Post said ICE has also deployed the software in other state databases, such as ones in Utah, Vermont, and Washington. 

    “They have a wide-open door to be able to search through anything in this database,” said Maryland Sen. Clarence K. Lam (D-Howard), who has openly told state officials that there needs to be more oversight on ICE’s use of the database. “They’ve not been forthcoming in their willingness to [stop it] or coming up with solutions.”

    Rudolph said ICE searches affect everyone, not just immigrants, due in part because of the facial-recognition software can produce errors and misidentify people, leading agents to pursue the wrong person. 

    “If you’re a US citizen and thinking ICE facial-recognition searches don’t affect you, you’re wrong,” he added. “With face recognition, the question is not whether you are an immigrant, but whether an error-prone technology thinks you look like an immigrant.”

    Facial-recognition software deployed by ICE to track immigrants is something that tyrannies like China are using to control their population. 

    Law enforcement agencies across the country have also embraced facial recognition and AI surveillance. 

    Last month, the Chicago Police Department was caught using a controversial facial recognition tool that scans social media platforms to pinpoint the identity of unknown suspects. 

    There are additional downside risks of AI surveillance and data harvesting; that is, a hacker can steal the treasure trove of data. This is what happened with a Manhattan-based facial recognition company that uses AI to collect data from unsuspecting social media users reported this week that their entire client list was stolen.

    Although AI promises to make ICE and other law enforcement agencies more effective in crimefighting, the troubling trend is that the US could be sleepwalking into a technological tyranny, just like China.


    Tyler Durden

    Sun, 03/01/2020 – 17:45

Digest powered by RSS Digest

Today’s News 1st March 2020

  • The Trilateral Commission: Using Crisis As An Opportunity To Reform
    The Trilateral Commission: Using Crisis As An Opportunity To Reform

    Authored by Steven Guinness,

    A couple of years ago I posted an article that gave a brief overview of the Trilateral Commission, quoting directly from numerous former members of the institution and how their overarching goal was for the integration of nation states at the expense of self determination.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    It was in the article where I argued that the prevailing model for globalists dating back to at least the First World War has been to use crisis as an opportunity, first by instigating periods of chaos before presenting themselves as the order to the ensuing turmoil. Four of the world’s largest global institutions – The Bank for International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the United Nations – were founded on this principle. Without a series of crises there would have been no rationale for them to exist.

    A trend over the past few years has been how in the midst of geopolitical conflict global bodies and world leaders have called for the likes of the European Union and the World Trade Organisation to undergo substantial reforms in the wake of a rise in political nationalism and protectionism. The push for reform has been largely justified on the grounds that the international ‘rules based global order‘ – brought to be out of the ruins of World War II – is under threat, and all as a direct consequence of the growth in anti-globalisation movements that are often characterised as ‘populism‘.

    So if global institutions want to broaden their level of power through deeper centralisation, where exactly does the Trilateral Commission fit into that? Earlier this month I happened by chance on a blog called ‘Dorset Eye‘, which launched in 2012 and describes itself as ‘an online citizen media magazine in which local, national and international members of the public have their voices heard‘.

    One of Dorset Eye’s recent articles focused on the Trilateral Commission, and made reference to a report published by the institution in the summer of 2019 titled, ‘Democracies Under Stress: Recreating the Trilateral Commission to Revitalize Our Democracies to Uphold the Rules-Based International Order‘. Strangely, the brochure in question is not directly accessible from the Trilateral Commission’s website. A search on google for the document produces an authentic and downloadable PDF file, but no actual location for it on the group’s web page. For whatever reason, the Commission has not made this document easily accessible.

    Before we look at some of detail contained within the brochure, it should be noted that its publication came two years after the deaths in 2017 of the Trilateral Commission’s two founding members – David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski. It also followed the death of Peter Sutherland, who was the European Chairman of the Commission from 2001 to 2010 and also the former chairman of Goldman Sachs. In particular, with Rockefeller and Brzezinski now deceased, the Trilateral Commission now sees a need to ‘recreate‘ itself and carry on the work of it’s founding father’s.

    In the executive summary of the brochure, the Commission remarks how ‘the global order that seemed so invincible at the end of the Cold War is now in doubt‘:

    Whether the world proves able to tackle the most urgent problems facing mankind today will in part depend on the ability of advanced democracies to overcome their current malaise and work together as they have in past decades.

    A forty-five year old organization, the Trilateral Commission is recreating itself to be a leader and an indispensable resource in this effort.

    They talk of ‘rediscovering their roots‘, ‘sharpening‘ their mission, and the need for ‘rejuvenating‘ their membership – all under the pretext of overcoming the challenges of the 21st century and to ‘uphold the rules-based international order.’

    One of the main challenges, according to the Commission, is that whilst ‘the drive toward deeper integration and greater globalization seemed irreversible until just a few years ago‘, the ‘unintended consequences of these trends— from inequality to cultural alienation—have fueled new forms of discontent, spurring a rise in populism and nationalism in the most advanced economies and democracies in the world.’

    The Commission opens themselves up as a solution by stating that ‘today’s institutions—both global and domestic—seem ill-equipped to face these trends down and ensure the maintenance of the rules-based international order.’

    They mention how the rise in populism and nationalism has caused nations around the world to become ‘compromised by internal divisions and governed by institutions that are no longer well-suited to the realities of the day.’

    As you would expect, the Commission has a plan for meeting these challenges. Firstly, it will require the democracies of North America, Europe and Asia to be ‘revitalized‘, and for the purging of ‘authoritarian regimes gaining confidence and establishing themselves more firmly on the global stage.’ Secondly, for this ‘democratic renewal‘ to be achievable, it will ‘require new voices and thinking from all segments of these societies.’

    One potential avenue for ‘renewal‘ is the adoption at national levels of the UN devised Green New Deal, championed heavily in the United States by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Come the 2024 election, she will be eligible at thirty five years old to run for the presidency.

    But seemingly, the Trilateral Commission’s drive to begin reforms is more immediate than four years into the future. Amidst supposed authoritarian regimes and the breakdown of the international order, they believe themselves to be ideally placed to deal with ‘global ills‘:

    The Trilateral Commission is well-poised to play a vital role in this revitalization
    effort, and seeks to once again become an analytical home for assessing the stresses
    on the advanced democracies, offering solutions for dealing with them, and catalyzing cooperation among these countries on global economic, political, and security matters.

    As noted in the brochure, one of the purposes of creating the Trilateral Commission back in 1973 was to ‘buttress a beleaguered trading order.’ When considering the rise in political protectionism, trade is at the forefront of the discussion. As well as the future trading relationship between the UK and the EU, and the ongoing trade conflict between the U.S. and China, there is now the added element of the Coronavirus which threatens to restrict global supply chains. Taken together, it is a melting pot of developing crises.

    Not surprisingly, the Commission considers itself ‘uniquely well-suited to address the many challenges that are common to advanced democracies and to spur greater cooperation across them‘:

    It is the only organization to bring all the affected countries together in this trilateral structure, positioning it well to connect experts, institutions, and other entities to diagnose what is straining these democracies and to prescribe steps to shore them up.

    By coincidence or otherwise, in detailing how the international structure of the Commission is capable of meeting ‘pressing global problems‘, one of the examples given for this is in dealing with pandemics. Nuclear proliferation, climate change and protectionism are also recognised as problems.

    As I have written about previously, the roots of the Commission stem from the field of banking. Founder David Rockefeller used to be the chairman of Chase Manhattan bank, and at one time eight members of the board at Chase were members of Rockefeller’s Commission. A look at the membership list for 2020 shows that the Commission remains largely populated by corporate interests within the banking, oil and media sectors. You will also find as part of the membership former Prime Ministers and members of national parliaments. In the UK one of the most notable examples is Keir Starmer, who is currently running to be the next leader of the Labour Party. Michael Bloomberg, who is running to be the Democrat candidate in the U.S. election, is also a member.

    What began as an elitist organisation remains so today given that is remains dominated by the CEO’s, chairmen and representatives of the some of the biggest corporations and political jurisdictions on the planet.

    At a special event in 1998 to mark 25 years of the Trilateral Commission, a list of financial supporters from 1973 to 1998 was published to show names such as Exxon Corporation, AT&T Foundation, The Coca-Cola Company, The First National Bank of Chicago, Morgan Stanley & Co and Goldman Sachs. A list for the present day is not readily available.

    Putting that to one side, in devising a ‘new, more focused mission‘, the Trilateral Commission has identified a handful of themes in which it plans to return to regularly. One of these is populism. If the Commission are signalling that populism will be a leading theme of theirs going forward, it suggests that the resurgence in nationalism and protectionism still has some way to run. When you read between the lines they are anticipating that the ramifications of populism will see the fracturing of the international based order, and so will require the rejuvenation of global bodies e.g. greater centralisation of powers, to deal with.

    Another interesting statement made by the Commission is that they are ‘also identifying issues that can be advanced by its mix of policy and business leaders and do not necessarily require the adoption by national governments to have an impact.’ Tied into the whole narrative of the breakdown of the ‘rules based global order‘ is how national administrations risk becoming impotent in meeting international challenges. This passage may be suggesting that in the future the traditional model of government legislation – often maligned for not being decisive or willing enough to combat issues such as climate change – could be bypassed in favour of global governance. A world where corporate interests in step with reformed global institutions become in effect an international legislature.

    This theory is perhaps further reinforced when the Commission states that they will now ‘focus on tending to the strains that compromise the abilities of today’s advanced democracies to collectively tackle global dilemmas.’ It is my belief that without these ‘strains‘, the Commission does not have sufficient grounds to be able to justify advancing their sphere of influence.

    The brochure leaves us in no doubt that the Commission is ‘remaking itself‘. One of the ways it wants to do this is through ‘injecting new, innovative prescriptions into the national
    debate and governmental process‘ to achieve ‘better domestic and foreign policy
    outcomes.’

    With numerous global media outlets represented on the Commission, along with significant corporate interests, they appear well placed to begin fashioning these ‘prescriptions‘ and directing future public discourse through the mediums of the national press and social media. After all, within the membership are journalists from the UK, Europe and the U.S., a link that makes disseminating information from the Trilateral level down to the general population a much easier task.

    This will not be the last example we learn about of global institutions seeking wide scale reforms amidst rising geopolitical instability. The greater level of chaos that is inflicted upon nation states will only strengthen the hand of the Trilateral Commission and others to supersede national sovereignty in favour of globally devised solutions.


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 23:10

  • The Countries Best And Worst Prepared For An Epidemic
    The Countries Best And Worst Prepared For An Epidemic

    The Centers For Disease Control and Prevention has stated that another case of the coronavirus has been detected in the United States, pushing the total number of confirmed cases over 60 with 22 outside of the evacuees (and Washington State has announced the first US death from Covid-19) According to tracking by Johns Hopkins University, over 85,000 people have been infected, the vast majority of them in China. The coronavirus has also slowly spread to many other countries with cases reported across the globe.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Even though Chinese authorities have said that they have observed evidence of person-to-person transmission, health officials in Orange and LA counties in the United States have said that the precautions in place should stop any spread of the coronavirus.

    As Statista’s Niall McCarthy notes, that raises the question: which countries are the most and least prepared to contain large outbreaks of disease?

    In October of last year, the Global Health Security Index was released and it assessed levels of global health security across 195 countries. It specifically analyzed levels of preparation by focusing on whether countries have the proper tools in place to deal with serious disease outbreaks. Countries were scored on a scale of 0 to 100 where 100 is the highest level of preparedness.

    Infographic: The Countries Best And Worst Prepared For An Epidemic | Statista

    You will find more infographics at Statista

    The United States was named as the country with the strongest measures in place and it came first with 83.5 out of 100.

    The United Kingdom came second with 77.9 followed by the Netherlands with 75.6.

    China, which has initiated a series of lockdowns in response to the outbreak, comes 51st with a score of 48.2.

    This map shows levels of preparation across the world and Africa’s vulnerability is immediately noticeable. It has struggled with serious diseases in the past and in 2014 a major Ebola outbreak devastated parts of West Africa, killing over 10,000 people.

    So far, countries in Africa have only reported 3 confirmed cases of the coronavirus. Nevertheless, the continent has some of the weakest countries when it comes to containing disease with Equatorial Guinea (16.2) and Somalia (16.6) the worst scoring countries in the Global Health Security Index.


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 22:45

  • Trump And The Politics Of Coronavirus
    Trump And The Politics Of Coronavirus

    Authored by Tom Luongo via Gold, Goats, ‘n Guns blog,

    Normally I agree with Moon of Alabama’s analysis on foreign affairs and certainly geopolitics. But the latest post discussing the political fallout from spread and potential mismanagement of nCOVID-19 is nothing short of fantasy.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    I don’t disagree that China, assuming that the numbers they’ve published are any more real than a lot of their economic numbers, has shown remarkable power to stop the spread of the disease.

    And they have done so so as to disrupt supply chains all across the world. This week the equity markets finally came to terms with the real world effects of such a disruption, even if the disease itself is, in the end, controllable and the response to it to this point, overblown.

    I’m not saying it is one way or the other. I’ve heard every conspiracy theory about this virus you can imagine. It speaks directly to the power of rumor and the ability for people absent good information to make up stories that fit their personal bias.

    And in this post B. betrays his in a way that, frankly, highlights just how little he understands America, its culture and the electorate.

    Under the U.S. medical system testing will be expensive for the patients. Insurances may not pay for it. Many people will be unable or unwilling to spend money on it. Care for serious cases will also be limited by high prices. This guarantees that the virus will spread further. China was smart enough to guarantee 100% state coverage for testing and all necessary care. The U.S. should follow that principle but is  unlikely to do so.

    Trump announced that Vice-President Pence, a man who does not believe in science, will lead the response. The libertarian and neo-liberal approach to the problem will further the epidemic’s growth. Only after it becomes really severe will the necessary measures be taken. 

    His assumptions are ridiculous. People in the U.S. get the annual flu shot, which is demonstrably ineffective, by the millions. The flu shot is subsidized through insurance and government redistribution of wealth via taxes.

    If the threat becomes truly real to people in the U.S. they will get tested. The Trump administration will allocate billions to it and the people here, already inculcated over the generations in public health will respond accordingly.

    If China was able to test 320,000 people that quickly, and the test is so effective, why is the CDC going it alone developing its own test and not just using China’s?

    This is what we pay governments to do, coordinate disaster response, work with other governments, provide basic infrastructure for society.

    The dysfunctional medical system in the U.S. isn’t a function of the “libertarian or neo-liberal approach,” which itself is a criticism that doesn’t understand the very real difference between those two schools of thought.

    It’s a function of the ever-growing push to socialize medical care (and everything else) in the first place.

    The great myth of central planning is that capital can be rationally allocated through the elimination of profit and incentive. And that will just magically produce the right outcomes for society.

    Because in the end, the U.S. doesn’t have a libertarian medical system. It has a socialized system so arcane and expensive that is designed to make the argument for more control over public health not less.

    But this isn’t B.’s biggest error. His biggest error is in thinking that Donald Trump is some kind of bastion of the free market and in favor of the rational allocation of scarce resources through it.

    He’s not. He never has been and he won’t ever be. Trump likes markets he can control and doesn’t believe in open competition. If he did he wouldn’t erect trade barriers and engage in economic strangulation.

    So to say that Trump is in trouble because of this virus to this point is nonsensical.

    Trump’s reelection chances are sinking as Covid-19 cases rise. The incompetence of his administration will come under new light. The stock markets will continue to tumble and erase the economic gains Trump had claimed. Bernie Sanders’ chances of winning, if he survives the pandemic, will increase as his prime campaign promise -Medicare for all- will become even more acceptable when the problems with the current U.S. healthcare system come under new public scrutiny.

    Trump’s re-election chances will rise with this coronavirus. Those who hate him will hate him more, like B. (who is German and doesn’t vote here). Those who love him will rally around him if he leads.

    And on this point I agree with Pat Buchanan who also feels like this is an opportunity for Trump to rise above the petty politics of Congress and show leadership and strength, allocating resources at his disposal the same way he did for domestic natural disasters like the recent Hurricanes that pounded the Gulf Coast and Florida.

    … the president occupies what Theodore Roosevelt called the “bully pulpit,” the White House. He can use that pulpit daily to command the airwaves and inform, lead, unite and direct the nation during what could be a months-long crisis. And Trump alone has the power to declare a national emergency, should that be needed.

    If Trump acts as a leader, urging unity in the struggle to contain the virus and discover a vaccine, the hectoring from the Democratic left, already begun, can come to be seen as unpatriotic.

    And this is something he can and will do. I wasn’t crazy about Trump’s presser the other day, blasting the CDC for creating a panic which Trump feels helped drop the stock markets this week.

    That’s not leadership. That’s whining. And the biggest threat to Trump’s re-election at this point is Trump, not Bernie Sanders or whomever the Democrats nominate after stealing it from him.

    The biggest fear the leftists in the U.S. and Europe have at this point is that Trump and his band of ‘know-nothings’ like Pence actually steer the U.S. through the upcoming crises well.

    The CDC is facing a large budget cut so it’s no shock that they would try to blindside Trump to make him look reckless now. But Trump shouldn’t take that bait and move past it.

    What if the U.S. healthcare system survives this? What if the doom porn purveyors are all wrong? What if COVID-19 really isn’t that much worse, in the end, than the annual flu?

    Trump can and will make easy political work of his opponents trying to hector him for spending cuts by reminding them all that they have done nothing but block his ability to control the border to the country.

    If anything this will strengthen Trump’s hand across a number of real issues.

    During times of crisis and/or war how often is there a radical change in leadership? Not often. It will take a lot more than a few thousand points off the Dow and some fear-mongering to shift the electoral map of the U.S. far enough for Bernie Sanders to beat him.

    Public health crises are not the time to grind political axes. The fact that even the best critics of the U.S. succumb to that tells you the depth to which the failures of Marxism scare them.

    Because make no mistake, any failure to contain this virus will come from our having too much faith in the myth of central planning, not in not having enough of it.

    *  *  *

    Join My Patreon if you remain skeptical of everything the gov’t tells you.  Install the Brave Browser if you want the option of still talking about it.


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 22:20

  • Tom Steyer Drops Out After Getting Spanked By Joe Biden In South Carolina
    Tom Steyer Drops Out After Getting Spanked By Joe Biden In South Carolina

    Update (1035ET): And there it is.

    In a tweet confirming his decision to drop out, Steyer reminds the voters who rejected him that he got into this race to “fight for racial, climate and economic justice,” before inviting them to “Join me in doing whatever it takes to beat Mr. Trump.”

    Does that mean you’ll support Bernie Sanders financially and with your endorsement if he wins the nomination?

    Well…

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    As the Washington Examiner put it, “After half a year and more than $200 million spent, Tom Steyer finally closed the door on his spectacular failure of a mid-life crisis masquerading as a presidential campaign.”

    Nicely done.

    We’d also like to note that Robyn Kanner, a web designer who has worked for at least one democratic campaign this election cycle, and is now employed at a political consulting firm, tweeted earlier that “we’re only 72 hours from an overwhelming majority of Presidential candidates dropping out.”

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    * * *

    Update (2156ET): Still nothing on Steyer’s twitter feed (no slickly produced video? We thought that was your thing?) but Bloomberg has apparently confirmed.

    • TOM STEYER ENDS CAMPAIGN FOR THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION FOR PRESIDENT – CAMPAIGN SOURCE

    Steyer has zero delegates, and despite being on track for a third-place finish Saturday night in SC, he likely won’t pick up any delegates. We suspect the quest for his endorsement won’t be all that fierce among his former rivals.

    * * *

    Leave it to a comically out-of-touch billionaire to go out on a low note.

    After Joe Biden savagely spanked him in front of millions of Americans during the pre-SC debate, then spanked him again in the actual primary, which Biden is projected to win by a surprisingly large margin, billionaire financier Tom Steyer is reportedly dropping out of the Democratic Primary.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    There hasn’t been any official word out of the Steyer camp yet; the last thing the ‘candidate’ tweeted was a tweet urging supporters to go out and support the race’s true champion of climate justice, an issue that Biden, Bloomberg and the rest of the Democratic pack brutalized him over his investing record (which of course includes holdings in fossil fuel companies etc…).

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Steyer is most famous for financing an advertising campaign urging lawmakers to sign his petition to impeach President Trump – he called it the ‘Need to Impeach’ campaign. They eventually did, but we suspect that Steyer’s unyielding support for the issue had little to do with it.

    Sayonara, Tom. We’ll miss you, and your dumb tie, too.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

     

     


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 22:15

  • Illinois Reports Another "Presumptive" Case Of Coronavirus, Bringing US Total To 24; Washington Declares State Of Emergency After 1st US Death: Live Updates
    Illinois Reports Another “Presumptive” Case Of Coronavirus, Bringing US Total To 24; Washington Declares State Of Emergency After 1st US Death: Live Updates

    Summary:

    • CDC says “no national spread of coronavirus in US”

    • Cook County reports “presumtive” coronavirus case

    • S.Korea reports another 376 new cases

    • Another Chinese doctor dies in Wuhan

    • China reports 573 new cases.

    • US reports first death from Covid-19 (in Washington State)

    • Washington declares state of emergency

    • US Surgeon General says “stop buying masks”

    • Trump blasts media/Dems for ‘hoax’-gate

    • South Korea’s Shincheonji Church members found 1557 out of 1900 tested positive for virus

    • Germany boosts border controls

    • Italy tops 1000 cases (1,128, with 29 possible virus-linked deaths)

    • France bans large gatherings

    * * *

    Update (2200ET): Public health officials in Illinois said Saturday night that they had a new “presumptive case” , what would be the state’s third case of coronavirus since the outbreak began. If confirmed by the CDC, the case would increase the total in the US to 24 (aside from the evacuees, who are all in quarantine right now).

    The case was confirmed in Cook County, the second-largest county in the US, which includes the city of Chicago, where about half of its residents live. All three of the state’s cases now will have been confirmed in Cook County, with the prior two cases being a husband and wife who had recently traveled to Wuhan. It’s unclear whether this is another case of ‘unknown transmission’.

    The positive test results must still be confirmed in a CDC lab in Atlanta. Until then, the patient is being hospitalized in isolation and CDC protocols are being implemented, according to NBC News.

    Yesterday, Illinois Gov. Jay Pritzker requested that hospitals across the state implement additional testing to improve surveillance for coronavirus.

    * * *

    Update (2030ET): And here comes the NHC with China’s numbers from Saturday. Mainland China reported 573 new coronavirus cases. Note the ~150 case increase from 427 on Friday. 51,856 are still under “medical observation” across China. In all, there have been 79,824 confirmed cases in mainland China, though most experts believe the true total could be much higher.

    Here’s the rest of the NHC press release,  translation courtesy of the NHC:

    On Feb 29, 31 provincial-level regions on the Chinese mainland as well as the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps reported 573 new cases of confirmed infections, 132 new cases of suspected infections, and 35 deaths (34 in Hubei province and 1 in Henan province). 2,623 patients were released from hospital after being cured. 8,620 people who had had close contact with infected patients were freed from medical observation. Serious cases decreased by 299.

    As of 24:00 on Feb 29, the National Health Commission had received 79,824 reports of confirmed cases and 2,870 deaths in 31 provincial-level regions on the Chinese mainland and the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, and in all 41,625 patients had been cured and discharged from hospital. There still remained 35,329 confirmed cases (including 7,365 in serious condition) and 851 suspected cases. So far, 660,716 people have been identified as having had close contact with infected patients. 51,856 are now under medical observation.

    On Feb 29, Hubei reported 570 new cases of confirmed infections (including 565 in Wuhan), 64 new cases of suspected infections (including 50 in Wuhan), and 34 deaths (including 26 in Wuhan). 2,292 patients were released from hospital after being cured, including 1,675 in Wuhan.

    As of 24:00 on Feb 29, Hubei had reported 66,907 cases of confirmed infections (including 49,122 in Wuhan) and 2,761 deaths (including 2,195 in Wuhan). In all, 31,187 patients had been cured and discharged from hospital, including 19,227 in Wuhan.There still remained 32,959 confirmed cases (including 27,700 in Wuhan), with 7,107 in serious condition (including 6,393 in Wuhan), and 646 suspected cases (including 393 in Wuhan).

    As of 24:00 on Feb 29, 144 confirmed infections had been reported in the Hong Kong and Macao special administrative regions and Taiwan province: 95 in Hong Kong (2 had been dead and 33 had been cured and discharged from hospital), 10 in Macao (8 had been cured and discharged from hospital) and 39 in Taiwan (1 had been dead and 9 had been cured and discharged from hospital).

    In other news, the Korea Times just reported that a 45-day-old baby has been infected with the virus. Another tragic story – this time out of China: Another doctor has died in Wuhan, making him at least the fourth or fifth to die since the death of Dr. Li Wenliang a month ago.

    The doctor’s name was Jiang Xueqing. He was 55.

    * * *

    Update (2000ET): Yonhap just reported the latest numbers out of South Korea: the country reported another 376 new cases on Saturday, raising the countrywide total to 3,526. Most of the cases reported so far have been concentrated in the city of Daegu, particularly among members of a strange cult-like church that has become entangled in the outbreak.

    It doesn’t look like any new deaths were reported – at least not yet.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    To review: three new cases of the virus were announced Saturday in Washington State bring the total number of infections in the US to 23, excluding repatriations, according to the CDC. 47 of the evacuees from Wuhan and the Diamond Princess are also being quarantined.

    As part of its virus-suppression efforts, South Korea has sent its troops to disinfect the streets of Daegu.

    In Mexico, the government hit back at President Trump’s comment Saturday that it might be necessary to close the border to prevent transmission of coronavirus, with the Foreign Ministry reminding the administration that “there are four cases of covid-19 registered in our country and 22 in the U.S.”

    Trump said closing the border probably wouldn’t be necessary.

     

    *  *  *

    Update (19120ET): We’re moving into a ‘twilight zone’ of sorts for coronavirus-related news: It’s still early in the morning in Asia, and it’s the middle of the night in Europe.

    But, while we have time, we’d just like to point out that Singapore, a city that has been praised as a role model (ignore what the WHO said about China) for outbreak suppression. 

    But as we reported below, the four new cases reported out of Singapore on Saturday put the total over 100. As the Straits-Times pointed out, eight recent cases have been linked to one e-learning solutions company that might be the center of a new outbreak.

    Meanwhile, over in Thailand, health officials reported a new case yesterday that brought its total to 42.

    Going forward, it will be a question of whether governments succeed in mimicking Bangkok, or Daegu. Will public health officials succeed in suppressing the outbreak before things get out of hand? Or will we see a flood of videos on social media showing citizens collapsing in the streets?

    * * *

    Update (1630ET): The BBC reports that in Daegu, South Korea, 1900 Shincheonji Church members have been tested for coronavirus. 1300 had symptoms & 600 did not. Among those 1300 with symptoms, 87.5% were confirmed with the virus . BUT out of the 600 WITHOUT symptoms, 70% were confirmed with coronavirus.

    *  *  *

    Update (1530ET): Following the first death of a Coid-19-infected person in the US, Washington state has declared a state of emergency.

    King County official Jeff Duchin says that 27 patients and 25 staff members at the long-term care facility in Kirkland, WA are showing symptoms.

    CDC’s Messonnier stated that “there is not a national spread of the virus in the US,” and adds that US has capacity to test 75,000 people.

    CDC erroneously identified the patient as a female in a briefing earlier today with the President and Vice President.

    *  *  *

    Update (1515ET): President Trump has finally wrapped up a lengthy press conference that most agreed was more convincing than his previous effort on Wednesday. Trump confirmed that there are now 22 cases in the US outside of the evacuees from Wuhan and the ‘Diamond Princess’.

    Read more about it here.

    Washington State is expected to hold a press conference of its own at 4 pm ET.

    * * *

    Update (1350ET): Trump is officially 20 minutes late, and following reports about Trump tightening the border with Mexico, the governor of the northern Mexican state of Coahuila has confirmed what appears to be the country’s fourth case.

    Here’s more on the border reports from Reuters.

    The administration is also weighing possible restrictions on the entry of travelers from South Korea, Italy and Japan. The White House instructed DHS to draft a range of options about travel restrictions related to those countries.

    Yesterday, Hugo Lopez-Gatell, Mexico’s assistant health secretary, confirmed a case in Mexico City and at least one other case in the cartel-dominated region of Sinaloa. He also encouraged Mexicans to hold back on hearty greetings involving kisses and hugs and close contact.

    * * *

    Update (1325ET): Trump is set to start speaking in a few minutes, but a rash of important virus-related headlines just hit, including a Reuters report that the administration is considering imposing restrictions at the Mexican border as part of its effort to suppress the outbreak.

    France just confirmed roughly 30 new cases, raising its total from 73 to north of 100, according to the latest reports.

    One more thing: We neglected to mention earlier that Washington State discovered another case of coronavirus, which it announced at press conference late last night: The state’s third coronavirus patient overall had recently traveled to South Korea.

    Also, the CDC has announced a press conference of its own at 3 pm, while Washington State is planning a press conference at 4 pm.

    In other words, it’s gonna be a busy Saturday afternoon.

    • FRANCE RAISES NUMBER OF CONFIRMED CORONAVIRUS CASES TO 100 – HEAD OF FRENCH PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
    • TRUMP ADMINISTRATION CONSIDERING IMPOSING ENTRY RESTRICTIONS AT BORDER WITH MEXICO OVER CORONAVIRUS THREAT – U.S. OFFICIALS
    • CDC PRESS CONFERENCE AT 3 PM

    While we wait to hear from Trump, who will almost inevitably begin late, here’s a graphic showing the history of pandemics for you to ponder.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Meanwhile, here’s a chart showing the France:

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    And Italy:

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    * * *

    Update (1310ET): As we wait for President Trump’s latest update, here’s another roundup of updates from across the Middle East and Europe, via Al Jazeera.

    • Two more people in the Netherlands have been diagnosed with the coronavirus, increasing the total number of the cases to six, according to health agency RIVM.
    • Iraq has detected five new cases of coronavirus, four in Baghdad and one in Babel province, the health ministry said, taking the total number of cases there to 13.
    • Azerbaijan shuts its border with Iran after the country confirmed its first case yesterday; two patients have been placed in quarantine after testing positive.
    • Lebanon has confirmed three new cases, bringing its total to 7.
    • Pakistan has confirmed two new cases, bringing its total to 4.

    Over in the US, more colleges are cancelling their study abroad programs: UConn just joined a growing list of schools, which CNN is tracking here.

    * * *

    Update (1250ET): Minutes after President Trump announced his 130pmET press conference to discuss the latest coronavirus developments, Washington State health officials have reported the first death from the coronavirus in the US.

    No details yet, but it’s probably reasonable to suspect that the death is the state’s latest case (remember, it was also home to the first confirmed case in the US, a case that reportedly recovered) of ‘unkown origin’ which it announced last night.

    Of course, it’s also possible that this could have been a post-mortem confirmation…meaning it would also constitute a new case.

    Washington State health officials are also planning to hold a press conference shortly.

    So much for routing all information through the VP’s office…

    In Italy, officials confirmed that the number of confirmed cases has passed 1,000. The number of confirmed deaths in the country climbed to 21 on Friday.

    The US isn’t the only country struggling with a rash of unexplained cases. The same phenomenon has frustrated public health officials in Japan, Italy and the UK.

    The BBC reports that the UK’s 20th case is also believed to be the first person who was infected inside the UK, since they hadn’t traveled abroad recently.

    As we wait to learn more, here’s some more information about the latest FDA announcement, courtesy of the NYT’s virus live feed:

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced Saturday that it was authorizing American laboratories to develop their own coronavirus tests, which should significantly increase the country’s testing capacity.

    The effect could be rapid. About 80 labs and private companies have applied for emergency approval for tests they have already created. If they have submitted evidence that the tests work, the labs and companies will be able to use them immediately, rather than wait for the F.D.A. to complete reviews and issue approvals.

    “This action today reflects our public health commitment to addressing critical public health needs and rapidly responding and adapting to this dynamic and evolving situation,” the F.D.A.’s commissioner, Stephen M. Hahn, said in a statement.

    Experts have been frustrated with the limited availability of coronavirus tests in the U.S., which until now could only be provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Broader testing will enable more rapid detection and isolation of people who have the coronavirus to help contain the spread of disease.

    * * *

    Update (1235ET): President Trump will hold another press conference to discuss “the latest CoronaVirus developments” at 1:30pm.

    * * *

    The unceasing 24/7 flood of coronavirus news yielded some disturbing developments last night as public health officials in Oregon and Washington State confirmed the third and fourth coronaviruses of “unknown origin” in the US.

    To President Trump’s chagrin, public health officials on the west coast warned that the cases are evidence that community outbreaks have already begun in Northern Cali, Oregon and Washington State. So if you were planning on traveling to the Pacific Northwest any time soon…you might want to reconsider.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    In Europe, the Middle East and the Far East, we saw a rash of new cases overnight (including the first case in Qatar) nearly doubled on Friday to  along with news of more cancellations of sports games, concerts and public events. France has temporarily banned all public events involving more than 5,000 people. Health Minister Olivier Véran announced the decision after an emergency government meeting on Saturday.

    Veran also confirmed 16 new cases of coronavirus on Saturday, bringing the country’s total taking to 73 since the outbreak began. Two patients have died, a 60-year-old French teacher and an 80-year-old Chinese tourist. On Friday alone, the number of confirmed cases nearly doubled.

    Across France, all gatherings of more than 5,000 people in confined spaces will be cancelled.” The same applies to events “in an open environment where people can mix with others from areas where the virus is possibly circulating,” according to France24.

    France’s decision follows Switzerland, which announced a similar ban on Friday. In Italy’s three virus-hit northern provinces, schools and universities are preparing to remain shut for a second week.

    South Korea reported more than 800 new coronavirus cases on Saturday, the biggest jump of any country, and twice the number reported yesterday by Chinese authorities in Hubei. Unsurprisingly, the increase was mostly concentrated in Daegu, the epicenter of the outbreak in South Korea.

    But the biggest news Saturday morning was in the US, where the FDA released sweeping new guidelines speeding up hospitals’ ability to test for the virus, appearing to resolve an issue about which public health officials, epidemiologists and labs from NYC to Cali had loudly complained. According to WaPo, some experts are worried that these new measures will still fall short. We suspect we will soon know for certain if the changes were effective, or not.

    Read the full briefing below:

    Virus by Zerohedge on Scribd

    Elsewhere in the US, while much of the focus so far has been on the west coast, local media outlets reported on Saturday that a suspected coronavirus patient has been isolated at Bayshore Medical Center in Holmdel, New Jersey, as the hospital awaits the results of a test, which could take a few days.

    The patient has yet to test positive, but is showing suspicious symptoms, the hospital said. It continues to screen all patients who have recently visited hot zones, or who are showing suspicious symptoms.


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 22:13

  • Wealth Of World's Ten Richest Men Now Greater Than GDP Of 85 Poorest Countries
    Wealth Of World’s Ten Richest Men Now Greater Than GDP Of 85 Poorest Countries

    Bernie Sanders appears on track to clinch the Democratic nomination to the consternation of the DNC, and every American voter who abhors his vision of a ‘Democratic socialist’ society has been reflecting on the successes and failures of capitalism. Of course, over the past ten years, there’s no question that economic inequality has widened, if only because the Federal Reserve and the rest of the central banks embarked on an unprecedented experimented in loose monetary policy.

    Now, as LearnBonds pointed out in a recent report, the cumulative wealth of the world’s ten richest people is now larger than the aggregate GDP of 85 impoverished countries.

    According to IMF figures for 2019 released back in October, the poorest 85 countries have a combined GDP of $813 billion. For comparison, by LB’s count, the net worth of the world’s 10 wealthiest individuals is $858.1 billion.

    In a bar chart, LB offers a few more helpful comparisons:

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Here’s another example:There isn’t a single African country that has a higher GDP when compared to the cumulative wealth of the top ten richest people. Nigeria, which has Africa’s highest GDP of $446.543 billion, amounts to about half of the net worth of the top ten wealthiest.

    Here’s another fun chart:

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Of course, the one thing Bernie Sanders’ supporters always seem to leave out during their tirades about evil billionaires is that most of this wealth isn’t real. It’s not like they have a giant vault filled with dabloons that they can swim in like Scrooge McDuck. Jeff Bezos, for example, holds like 99% of his wealth in Amazon stock. If something were ever to happen to Amazon, like – god forbid – Microsoft overtaking it as the top provider of cloud computing services, Bezos’ net worth will take a huge nosedive.

    Millions of savers and retirees would also get hurt as well, as the value of much of their equity index holdings would vanish.

    Of course, after this week, perhaps the elitest of the elites’ wealth is a little lower.


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 21:55

  • "The Public Doesn't Decide The Nominee": DNC Leaders Move To Limit Democratic Choice In The Convention
    “The Public Doesn’t Decide The Nominee”: DNC Leaders Move To Limit Democratic Choice In The Convention

    Authored by Jonathan Turley,

    As we have been discussing, establishment figures in the Democratic party and the media have been preparing to block any nomination of Bernie Sanders, including using the “superdelegates” to hand the nomination to another candidate. The New York Times reported Thursday that the Democratic establishment was preparing for open warfare over blocking Sanders, even if it shatters the unity of the party.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    If Sanders does not receive the necessary votes, they intend to take away the nomination even if he has the most votes in the first round. The key again are the superdelegates who are not elected in the primaries but given votes as elected officials.

    On MSNBC, former Obama adviser Anton J. Gunn was particularly blunt. He declared”:

    “The party decides its nominee. The public doesn’t really decide the nominee.”

    In 2016, many of us objected to the concerted effect of the Democratic establishment and the Democratic National Committee to rig the primary for Hillary Clinton. Later it was revealed that the Clintons have largely taken over the DNC by taking over its debt and the DNC openly harassed and hampered Sanders at every stage. Despite this effort, Sanders came close to beating Clinton, who has never forgiven him for contesting a primary that she literally bought and paid for with the DNC. The simmering rage was still evident in Clinton’s attack on Sanders and suggestion that she might not support him if he were the nominee (a suggestion that she later took back).

    Well the supers are back and Sanders may again find that it is the party elite, not the voters, who determine who will be the next nominee. The irony is that the elite hardly has an inspiring record. In 2016, every poll showed that voters did not want an establishment figure so the establishment rigged the process for the ultimate establishment figure. Clinton lost to the most unpopular Republican candidate in history. I remain convinced that Sanders could have won that election, a position recently suggested by Michael Bloomberg.

    Yet, the same people that gave us the Clinton nomination will be working their magic again at the Democratic Convention. What is fascinating is that the establishment would prefer to risk the election by alienating the huge young following of Sanders rather than allow Sanders to be the nominee. If they give the nomination to another establishment figures like Biden or a billionaire like Bloomberg, the establishment would enrage millions of Sanders followers who could well stay home in 2020.


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 21:30

  • After The Market's Week From Hell, Here's A List Of Who Was Puking
    After The Market’s Week From Hell, Here’s A List Of Who Was Puking

    Over the past 7 days, which came just after the stock market hit an all time high, and which turned out to be the worst week for the S&P since the vomit-inducing days of the 2008 financial crisis, and also saw the fastest 10% correction from a market peak on record

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    … we tried to put together the pieces of the “liquidation puzzle” to find out i) just who is selling, whether machines or people or some combination of both, and ii) is there more selling to go?

    Of course, as we now know, the answer to ii) was “oh yes” as an entire generation of traders who had never seen a violent market crash recoiled in terror at the relentless selling, which sent the Dow more than 3% lower on 3 distinct occasions.

    “A lot of us hadn’t seen this type of crash in our careers,” admitted Justin Wilder, a 31-year-old research analyst at DRW Holdings LLC in Montreal who has never experienced an actual bear market in his career. “There’s definitely some nervousness on the floor, both for the trading and our health” added Justin who was still in high school when Lehman filed for bankruptcy and the S&P lost more than half of its value before the Fed stepped in with QE… and the rest is history.

    Other Millennials were just as incredulous: “With coronavirus, the market has found a reason to correct in a way that I’d never seen before,” Julian Carvajal, a 30-year-old FX trader at TCX Investment Management told Bloomberg.

    It’s been mental, and that’s probably an understatement,” said Rishi Mishra, a 29-year-old research analyst at Futures First, who was definitely in high school when Lehman filed for bankruptcy. “Many of us who weren’t trading during the 2008 crisis see this as one of those days you could tell your grandchildren about.” Well, Rishi, you may want to hold off on the grandchildren stories, especially if the Fed does not step in some 24 hours from now to prevent what may be a historic puke on Monday now that “community-spread” cases have emerged in the US, as well as the first coronavirus death.

    But while we now know the answer to ii) what about i)? Courtesy of the latest weekly report from Deutsche Bank’s flow expert Parag Thatte, we now know the answer to that too.

    The answer to “who was selling” is, in short, everybody.

    But before we get into the details, a quick reminder: we have been warning for the past two months that positioning and pricing in equities was extremely elevated, with most investors “all-in” in many cases with record leverage, and increasingly disconnected from growth indicators. And just in case any of the abovementioned millennial “traders” claim there were no signs a crash was imminent, well… there were, like the market being the most overbought and complacent ever, with every investor all-in as recently as last month:

    … only to become even more overbought and even more complacent, with investors even more all-in…

    … with record leverage and unprecedented “smart money” concentration in the same handful of stocks:

    … and since nothing could dent the relentless Nasdaq ascent, even as Apple cut guidance due to the coronavirus…

    … retail investors unleashed a never-before seen buying spree, and not just momentum stocks, but calls of momentum stocks…

    … to the point where retail investors’ record levered beta helped them outperform the entire hedge fund class!

    … and ushered in the “Profane, Greedy Traders of Reddit” who “Are Shaking Up the Stock Market” even as US consumers just reported the highest median current value of their market investments.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    In short, everyone felt invincible, and all thanks to the Fed’s QE4 which injected $600BN in the market and made even a modest drop appear impossible.

    Only… it was not meant to last, and in a market that took the express elevator up and the Wile-E Coyote anvil down, especially with short interest at all time lows providing almost no natural buffer to a selloff (as there were almost no shorts covering into the plunge)…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    … less than a week after markets hit an all time high, stocks crashed, suffering three 3%+ drops in the past week as algos suddenly realized that not even the Fed can print viral antibodies, resulting in the biggest one-day Dow Jones point drop on record (down 1,191 on “Viral Thursday”), but more importantly, the fastest 10% correction from an all-time Dow Jones high since just a few months before the start of the Great Depression.

    * * *

    Which brings us back to the original question: who was selling?

    We already know that retail investors were steamrolled, with the Goldman Sachs Retail Favorite basket tumbling after returning more than 16% YTD just last week, and is now down for the year (curiously, it is still outperforming the GS Hedge Fund VIP basket which as of this morning is down more than 3% in 2020.)

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    What about non-retail investors?

    Oh, where to start with a historic selloff that has sent equities catching down to all other asset classes?

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Well, how about at the top: as Thatte writes, equities positioning has flipped from being extremely overweight (95th percentile) to very underweight (12th percentile). DB’s consolidated positioning metric, which was at the top of its historical range last week (95th percentile) has now fallen very sharply to underweight levels (12th percentile).

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Meanwhile, the bank’s cross asset breadth indicator has crashed from a near all time high, to what is basically an all time low.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Worse, the true decline in positioning is likely bigger as some data is available only with a lag: as a result positioning is likely to decline further as momentum signals across all asset classes have now flipped to extreme, and in most cases record risk-off.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    A more detailed breakdown of selling classes finds that while discretionary investors were indeed taken to the woodshed, it was systematic investors who were absolutely hammered.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Among them:

    Vol control funds equity allocation is down sharply and their selling should start to diminish. Vol control funds have cut exposure to equities from historical maximum last week down to near the bottom of their range (5th percentile), selling $65bn of equities over the last one week.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    They can still cut equity exposure further if vol rises but with allocations already low, their sensitivity to incremental selloffs should start to diminish.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    CTAs have cut equity exposure to being short but are likely to go further. CTAs were extremely long equities until last week and have now flipped to being slightly short (18th percentile) but their positioning remains above levels seen during prior large selloffs in 2011, 2016 and 2018. Volatility as well as trend signals continue to deteriorate and point to them raising their short positions further.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Risk parity funds’ equity exposure is down from a record high but remains elevated. Risk parity funds are likely to cut exposure further as volatility  continues to remain elevated, but they tend to move more gradually compared to other systematic funds.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    How about non-retail, non-systematic investors? Here too the selling was widespread, with huge outflows from equity funds this week but more to come. Equity funds have seen outflows of -$28bn since the selloff began last Friday. However, prior inflows since late October had been extremely strong…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    … far more than implied by the modest rebound in global growth and we estimate that equity funds would need to see outflows of about -$130bn just to catch down.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Hedge funds, which were perhaps the least euphoric investors into the February meltup thanks to their curiously low beta…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    … suffered the least of all investors…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    For quants, the pain was widespread, but nowhere more so than the contrarians with value funds cratering to new all time low.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    And here is the worst news for Buy-The-Fucking-Dippers: according to Thatte, “in past large selloffs, outflows typically continued for several weeks”… which means that this thing will go on for a long time.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    There was some good news: after last week’s rout, stocks are finally realizing that there will be no earnings growth for the second consecutive year, and as a result the S&P is now pricing in negative EPS growth…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    … and an ISM plunging to 47.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    At the same time the put/call volume has reversed dramatically amid a surge in put buying which – at least from a contrarian standpoint – suggests that the market may finally be at a support level.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Putting this together, it means that unless it is now consensus that a global recession is coming – and as we discussed yesterday, one is certainly likely – the record sell-off may finally be poised to take a break.


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 21:05

  • 2A Under Fire In CA: Santa Clara Forms Gun Confiscation Team
    2A Under Fire In CA: Santa Clara Forms Gun Confiscation Team

    Authored by James Fite via LibertyNation.com,

    California continues to proudly lead the charge toward a disarmed citizenry. In the latest attack on the Second Amendment, Santa Clara County is forming what they call a “county gun team” – a unit of lawyers, analysts, and prosecutors authorized to seek out and confiscate firearms from those the state feels shouldn’t have them.

    Okay, Fine. We’re Coming For Your Guns

    Remember when Democrats used to try to mollify armed Americans by saying, “No one’s coming for your guns” with every incremental gun control measure they proposed?

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Well, it’s official: They’re coming for the guns – some of them, at least. Surprised? You shouldn’t be. As Liberty Nation’s Graham J. Noble once wrote, “Democrats have never come across a gun restriction they didn’t like.”

    The Santa Clara Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to approve funding for the proposal, which was put forth by board president Cindy Chavez. The team will consist of seven people – three crime analysts, two lawyers, and two prosecutors. They will be tasked with identifying those who have been ordered to surrender their weapons and ensure these dangerous people aren’t still armed. If necessary, they’ll obtain search warrants for local law enforcement to go and take the guns.

    Deputy District Attorney Marisa McKeown explained that “the very voluminous California laws on guns mean nothing if we don’t adequately and smartly enforce them.” She is correct, of course. Those who don’t care to follow the old laws aren’t likely to care much about the new ones. That’s why Second Amendment advocates say gun control doesn’t work.

    “The law says that there are categories of people who are not allowed to have a gun,” McKeown said. “If you are a domestic abuser with a restraining order, you can’t have a gun. If you are a convicted felon, you can’t have a gun. If you are a repeated, mentally ill offender who is dangerous, you can’t have a gun.”

    The List Grows Ever Longer

    While the Board dressed the proposal up as simply a way to protect the victims of domestic abuse, consider the words of the deputy DA. Now let’s have a look at the ever-growing list of people who aren’t allowed to own guns in California – by no means did she disclose them all. According to the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, as of December 10, 2019, the following groups are considered prohibited persons:

    • Those convicted of a felony or certain domestic violence crimes.

    • Those addicted to narcotic drugs.

    • Those convicted of specific crimes (both felony and misdemeanor) involving violence, hate crime offences, or the unlawful misuse of firearms.

    • Those convicted of violating state laws regarding safe storage of firearms around minors and prohibited people. This usually results in a ten-year prohibition.

    • Anyone who knows they are subject to an outstanding arrest warrant for a firearm-prohibiting offense – not convicted, simply subject to a warrant.

    • Those prohibited as a condition of probation.

    • Wards of the juvenile courts due to the commission of an offense involving violence, drugs, or firearms. This prohibition remains in effect until age 30.

    • Anyone who knows they are subject to a protective order, restraining order, temporary restraining order, or injunction issued by a court pursuant to state law – including extreme risk protection orders, otherwise known as red flag laws.

    • Anyone prohibited because of a history of severe mental illness or chronic alcoholism.

    This isn’t simply about disarming convicted felons – which is another issue in its own right. The Santa Clara County Gun Team might well be tasked with disarming anyone with a record of mental illness, drug or alcohol abuse, who might be suspected of some crime – violent or otherwise – or even parents who simply didn’t lock up their guns while the kids were home. Will the squad also be used to hunt down any firearms or accessories the state manages to ban in the future? Which groups, exactly, deserve to be stripped of the right to self-defense?

    The Costs – In Money, Liberty, And Lives

    Santa Clara County already employs one lawyer and a prosecutor who will be on this team. Taxpayers will fork over $427,247 to cover the $215,653 annual salary for the new attorney and the additional prosecutor’s $211,594. Grant money will cover the other expenses, including the remaining three staff member salaries, but the amount was not disclosed.

    But what about the human cost? What of the liberty lost when armed citizens are arrested for refusing to surrender their arms – or the lives lost should the encounter turn violent?

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The Second Amendment clearly states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, but let’s not pretend that actually matters in California. The Golden State has so infringed that right that any argument on Second Amendment grounds seems almost pointless. In truth, many other states and even the federal government have as well.

    The argument against this now seems to center on the violation of the right to due process. Under current state laws, this confiscation crew can get search warrants to disarm people who haven’t actually been convicted of anything. But as Herman Cain was always so fond of saying, “the devil is in the details.”

    Just as the gun grabbers reinterpreted the Second Amendment by setting their own definition for the word “arms” – or perhaps it was “people” or “infringed,” or some combination – they seem to be the ones deciding just what, exactly, due process means.


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 20:40

  • Bernie Boards Wrong Private Jet In Awkward Senior Moment
    Bernie Boards Wrong Private Jet In Awkward Senior Moment

    Democratic Socialist Bernie Sanders experienced a brain malfunction on Saturday when he accidentally boarded the wrong private jet, according to TMZ.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Photo via TMZ

    While wrapping up campaign stops in South Carolina and Massachusetts ahead of Super Tuesday, the 78-year-old boarded the wrong gulfstream.

    As for this little mix-up here, it’s kinda funny. Bernie’s been flying all over the country for different campaign events — so the guy’s definitely busy and has a preoccupied mind at the moment. Mistakes like this (getting on the wrong Gulfstream) are bound to happen. –TMZ

    While Sanders has been pictured on multiple commercial flights, he’s taken criticism for flying private jets at all while railing against the elites. Earlier this month, he was pictured boarding a different private jet – while candidate Elizabeth Warren took her own to the same D.C. airport from different locations just 36 minutes apart, according to the report – which notes that they could have simply flown together and saved the planet.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 20:15

  • Study Suggests That Moderate Drinkers Live Longer Than Those Who Totally Abstain
    Study Suggests That Moderate Drinkers Live Longer Than Those Who Totally Abstain

    Authored by Elias Marat via TheMindUnleashed.com,

    Enjoying a small bit of booze on a daily basis could actually help boost your life-span to a healthy 90 years of age, researchers have found.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The study, spearheaded by a team of scientists at Maastricht University Medical Centre in the Netherlands, discovered that men and women who indulge in a daily drink are 40 percent more likely to reach their 90th birthday than those who completely abstain.

    But before folks get carried away, it is important to note that the benefits of booze are restricted to those who stick to one daily drink, as binge-drinkers are prone to die earlier.

    While women can benefit most from drinking wine, men were found to benefit most from such liquors as brandy, gin, and whiskey.

    For the study, lead researcher Prof. Piet van den Brandt and his team tracked the drinking habits of over 5,500 people over the span of 20 years. Most of those people tracked by the Dutch team were born in 1914-1918, during the First World War.

    The volunteers were surveyed on their drinking habits while they were in their sixties and seventies before researchers monitored how many of them made it to the age of 90.

    According to the results published in the journal Age and Ageing, 34 percent of the women and 16 percent of the men reached that age.

    However, those who drank between 5 to 10 grams of alcohol per day – the equivalent of a half-pint of beer, a small glass of wine, or a standard shot of liquor – were 40 percent more likely to reach 90 years.

    And while drinking up to 15g per day slightly improved volunteers’ chances of reaching 90, any more than that led to premature death.

    In his report on the findings, Dr. van den Brandt said:

    “We found alcohol intake was positively associated with the probability of reaching 90 years of age in both men and women.

    Wine was associated with women reaching 90 but not with men. Instead, intake of gin, brandy and whisky increased their longevity.”

    Researchers remain unclear as to why the small daily doses of alcohol are so beneficial.

    However, researchers also warned that older people should be aware of how alcohol could potentially interfere with prescription medications. They also noted that the study should not be seen as an endorsement of imbibing alcohol.

    Dr. van den Brandt said:

    “This should not be used by anyone who does not currently drink alcohol as motivation to start drinking.”

    According to the Daily Mail, Lucy Holmes, a director of research and policy at Alcohol Change UK, said:

    “This study shows again what all the evidence points to and what the UK’s top doctors tell us – the healthiest choice is to drink 14 units a week or less.

    That’s a bottle and a half of wine, or six pints of normal strength lager, spread over three or more days. But if you don’t drink at the moment, this isn’t a reason to start.”


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 19:50

  • Joe Biden Wins South Carolina Primary, Trump Says "End Of Bloomberg's Joke Campaign"
    Joe Biden Wins South Carolina Primary, Trump Says “End Of Bloomberg’s Joke Campaign”

    Biden, who had only earned 15 delegates after the first three states had voted in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary, outpaced current front-runner Vermont Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders with a projected 60% of the vote to take control of at least 20 of South Carolina’s 54 pledged delegates.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    This was the first time in his three presidential runs that he won a state primary or caucus.

    Biden was quick to take a victory lap:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Amid a larger than expected African American voter turnout, Biden dominated the initial vote count…

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    And is forecast to win the primary.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The double-digit win for Biden, along with the likelihood of collecting many or most of the 54 delegates at stake, gives his campaign a much-needed shot in the arm ahead of the Super Tuesday primaries next week.

    President Trump was not slow in reacting either:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Does this mean the market will rally on Monday?


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 19:23

  • 2020 Crash – Complacency Came Before The Fall
    2020 Crash – Complacency Came Before The Fall

    Authored by Sven Henrich via NorthmanTrader.com,

    Complacency came before the fall. All of 2019 market participants ignored the non existent earnings growth. Too strong was the now pavlovian reflex to chase easy central bank money. Too trusting in central banks to again produce a reflation scenario that would make all the troubles go away.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Everything was ignored and markets and stocks were relentless chased higher into some of the highest market valuations ever. Even the coronavirus was ignored. A dip to buy in January they said. AAPL warning? Let’s ignore it and buy AAPL to new all time highs again.

    Nothing mattered until it did.

    Then markets crashed last week. Perhaps not in percentage terms, but in terms of vertical velocity to the downside it was unmatched in history. The fastest 15% correction off of all time highs ever and by far.

    Worse, months of buyers of stocks and markets at high valuations suddenly found themselves trapped as the bottom fell out inside of a few days:

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    $NYSE, the broader index dropping below the January 2018 highs and closing below the summer 2019 lows now showing an index that has gone nowhere in 2 years and the recent highs being a complete mirage.

    The big message: It was not different this time. Bears were right. Full stop.

    $DJIA fell all the way to the June 2019 low taking out 9 months of buying:

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Don’t anybody tell me everybody sold the top. No, lots of buyers are trapped at much higher prices and are now again dependent on central banks coming to the rescue.

    The very central banks that have led them into another liquidity trap. By printing, cutting rates, adding to the balance sheet at a record clip and even producing new record holdings of treasury bills the Fed has created a stock buying frenzy. In denial of its actions and the historic valuations that were created in the process the Fed caused a massive melt up in stocks and markets and now investors have paid the price as the Fed lost control:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    And now everybody is in hopes that the Fed can print even more to rescue markets once again.

    Sure enough on Friday Jay Powell came out and tried to “sooth” markets.

    It was oh so predictable:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    And I called it the week before:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    And here we are, the market now pricing in a 100% probability of a rate cut by March and Powell sending the signal it will come. Indeed markets are now pricing in nearly 4 rate cuts by early 2021 and there’s chatter about an emergency rate cut coming or global coordinated central bank intervention.

    They will react for certain and this reaction may well an drive aggressive counter rally in coming weeks from now extreme oversold conditions in markets.

    But the bigger issue now is that central banks are very much at risk of losing final control here, having left themselves vulnerable, intervening always at the first sign of trouble, and now they have precious little ammunition to deal with a real emergency if coronavirus is turning into something much more serious.

    Money printing does not start production chains or cause airlines to fly. So the risk of a global recession unfolding is a clear and present danger and then futures rallies would continue to get sold and markets may embark on a multi year bear market. That’s the risk they tried to avoid in 2019.

    We can’t know how any of this plays out of course and hopes are the virus will calm down in the next month or two and then this current shock to the system can recover and pent up demand can rescue the economy and markets into the second half. It’s possible, but it may also not be possible depending on the severity. Because frankly, we are watching a historic experiment unfold:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    I repeat: Nobody can know how this will play out. However we can let the technicals guide us, the very technicals that told us this rally was unsustainable, that it had massive issues, and that a reversion was coming.

    In this week’s video I’m focusing on what just happened and why, the damage that has been inflicted, the orchestra of support we witnessed on Friday, and what we may expect going forward including potential for an aggressive counter rally, but also resistance on any moves up given the technical damage that has occurred.

    *  *  *

    Please be sure to watch it in HD for clarity. To get notified of future videos feel free to subscribe to our YouTube Channel. For the latest public analysis please visit NorthmanTrader. To subscribe to our market products please visit Services.


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 19:00

  • Trump Exposes "Dishonest" Media Critics, Insists "We're Super Prepared" To Handle COVID-19 Outbreaks
    Trump Exposes “Dishonest” Media Critics, Insists “We’re Super Prepared” To Handle COVID-19 Outbreaks

    Update (1430ET): Despite a barrage of aggressive and even “dishonest” questions from reporters during an impromptu press conference held Saturday afternoon and the bombshell announcement of the first death in the US just minutes before it started, President Trump managed to convey a sense that the administration is really on top of things, and that initial reports about missteps and the “muzzling” of CDC officials were misrepresentations that may have been deliberately deceitful.

    President Trump, Vice President Mike Pence, HHS Secretary Alex Azar, CDC Director Robert Redfield and infectious disease head Dr. Anthony Fauci and several others delivered statements and took turns answering questions.

    Unsurprisingly, the first question, of course, was about Trump’s comment about the virus being a “hoax”, a statement Trump made at a rally in South Carolina that was misquoted and misrepresented by the press. Asked if he thought the outbreak was “hoax”, Trump clarified that he was talking about the Democrats criticism of his administration’s response to the outbreak, not the outbreak itself.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Nevertheless, reporters continued to harp on Trump’s “hoax” comment while hammering him on a range of issues from allegations that DHS workers were exposed to the virus while transporting evacuees, to reports that the administration was “muzzling” the CDC to try and prevent the ‘real scientists’ from breaking with the administration’s optimistic takes on the risk to the public health and economy.

    But as it turns out, the ‘real scientists’ actually agree with Trump: While the US needs to take deliberate steps to contain the outbreak, things so far actually haven’t been all that bad!

    During one particularly memorable moment, a reporter asked Trump about a WaPo report claiming that Vice President Pence “muzzled” CDC officials like Dr. Fauci, while intimating that the administration was emulating Beijing by trying to prevent ‘bad news’ from getting out.

    Fortunately, Dr. Fauci was there to rebut the claim: Which he did, with vigor.

    “I have never been muzzled – ever – and I’ve been doing this since the administration of Ronald Reagan. We were set up to go on some shows and when the VP took over…we had to stand down on a couple of shows and resubmitted for clearance, which we immediately got.”

    Moving on, at one point, Trump insisted that the US was “super prepared” to deal with the outbreak, while advising that “most Americans” who catch the virus will probably only experience mild flu-like symptoms (not the most reassuring thing he could have said, but hey…).

    The doctor, and legendary virus expert, then went on to reiterate that President Trump and the administration did act swiftly to try and contain the spread of the virus, and deserved some credit for doing so.

    Anyway, during the opening minutes of the press conference, President Trump confirmed that the US has confirmed 22 cases of COVID-19 outside of the dozens of evacuees from either Wuhan or the ‘Diamond Princess’.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Of the non-evacuee cases, four are very ill, 14 have recovered, and, as we learned just before the press conference started, one woman succumbed to the virus in Washington State. Trump then went on to claim that his administration has taken “the most aggressive action in modern history” to confront an outbreak.

    “Since the early stages of the foreign outbreak my administration has taken the most aggressive action in modern history to confront the spread of this disease,” Trump said.

    He added that he’s remained in contact with President Xi, and that China has made “tremendous progress.”

    “And I wanna say that China seems to be making tremendous progress. And if you read Tim Cook of Apple, you’ll see that they’re back to full operation in China,” Trump said.

    As far as we can tell, this isn’t exactly true, the company’s suppliers including Foxconn are still struggling to ramp up production. But most of the Apple stores in China have reopened.

    Next up was VP Pence, who announced new restrictions on travel from Iran – an expansion of existing travel restrictions – while increase travel advisories for hot zones in Italy and South Korea to ‘Level 4’. Pence added that he’s spoken to Washington State Gov. Jay Inslee, and that “every American would be proud of what I heard.” Pence credited the governor and his state for being on top of the outbreak in Washington, and declared that Pence’s team has been working “seamlessly” with state and local officials on the ground.

    But most importantly, Pence said that the risk to the American public – even those who live nearby where infections have been reported – remains “low.”

    “The average American does not need to go out and buy a mask,” Pence said.

    But if they feel like buying one anyway, Pence said the US has 40 million masks available today, and that the government has a new contract with 3M to produce 35 million more masks a month. Pence added that if the situation worsens, the administration would increase the availability of these masks.

    “Let me assure every American…that this is an ‘all hands on deck’ effort,” Pence said.

    Secretary Azar started his statement by offering condolences to the family of the woman who passed away from the virus in Washington State. He also said that the CDC and federal officials will fight the virus by assiduously “identifying and isolating” patients, while tracing their steps and warning everybody who came into contact with the infected persons that they need to be on high alert and report any suspicious symptoms. “This is an evolving situation and we will keep you appraised,” one said.

    Supporters and critics alike conceded that the press conference was far more reassuring than what Trump said on Wednesday. And by playing up Dr. Fauci’s role in the response, the administration has skillfully undercut its critics.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    But the real question is: Will the market feel the same?

    * * *

    Three days after President Trump held his first White House press briefing on the coronavirus threat – where he appointed Vice President Mike Pence to be the administration’s “not-Coronavirus Czar”, before quickly clarifying that it wasn’t a demotion for HHS Secretary Alex Azar (rumored to be near the top of the president’s shit list) – Trump will hold another presser at 1:30 ET to discuss the coronavirus threat.

    The presser is being held to discuss “the latest CoronaVirus developments”…

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Earlier this morning, the FDA announced a new plan to speed up testing and loosen restrictions on local labs, a decision that will likely lead to a surge in newly confirmed coronavirus cases as the true scope of the outbreak in the US becomes apparent.

    And don’t forget: State public health officials in Oregon, California and Washington State announced new coronavirus cases “of unknown origin” as others complained about restrictive CDC guidelines that slowed states’ ability to test new patients for the virus.

    In other words: Trump has some explaining to do.

    Watch live below:


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 18:55

  • 81% Of South Korean 'End Of Days' Worshippers Test Positive For Coronavirus
    81% Of South Korean ‘End Of Days’ Worshippers Test Positive For Coronavirus

    Last week we noted an in-depth report by Bloomberg on how a 61-year-old Korean ‘typhoid Mary‘ spread coronavirus throughout her doomsday religious cult after praying with at least a thousand other adherents.

    What made this case so much worse was that this person spent a considerable amount of time in a very crowded area,” said Seoul National University professor of health policy, Kim Chang-yup. “There’s growing fear and resentment among the people right now.”

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    As a result, over 1,900 members of the Shincheonji Church have been screened for coronavirus, of which 1,551 – or 81%, tested positive according to the BBC‘s Laura Bicker.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Of note, because the church’s leader (who believes he’s an immortal prophet sent by Jesus Christ) preaches about the end-of-days, followers have been accused of purposefully spreading the disease – however those reports are unconfirmed and there is no evidence to suggest this is occurring.

    What is known is that the church held religious gatherings in the Chinese city of Wuhan – the epicenter of the current outbreak.

    In short, expect similar results – assuming reports of purposeful infection are false – at similar places of worship around the world.


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 18:30

  • "Don't Test, Don't Tell!"
    “Don’t Test, Don’t Tell!”

    Authored by Ben Hunt via EpsilonTheory.com,

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    I believe that a healthy society should not have only one voice.

    – Li Wenliang, Wuhan physician, born October 12, 1986, died February 7, 2020.

    Last night, I received a Twitter DM that included screenshots of an email that went out to staff at the UC Davis Medical Center. After checking for authenticity, I posted the screenshots in a tweet of my own.

    And that’s when, as the kids would say, it blew up.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    I want to highlight a couple of quotes from this email.

    Since the patient did not fit the existing CDC criteria for COVID-19, a test was not immediately administered. UC Davis Health does not control the testing process.

    The facts here are pretty clear. Patient comes in from another hospital on Wednesday, Feb. 19 – this is one week ago – already intubated and on a ventilator, and the doctors at UC Davis – who have treated other COVID-19 cases – IMMEDIATELY suspect COVID-19.

    But the CDC refuses to test for COVID-19.

    Why? Because it didn’t fit their “criteria” for testing. They didn’t know for sure that the patient was in mainland China within the past 14 days, and they didn’t know for sure that the patient was in close contact with another confirmed case, so BY DEFINITION this patient can’t possibly have COVID-19. No test for you!

    This is “Don’t Test, Don’t Tell” and it is the single most incompetent, corrupt public health policy of my lifetime.

    And it’s happening all over the country.

    Here, take a look at yesterday’s press conference from Nassau County, Long Island.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Excruciating. They spend the first five minutes of the presser congratulating each other. Then the update: 83 people are in self-quarantine at home, where they are supposed to “check their temperature” daily. Don’t have a thermometer? Not to worry! The Nassau County Health Commission will provide one for you!

    Who are the 83 in self-quarantine? Why, they’re everyone that Homeland Security says should be in self-quarantine, based on “current guidelines” of someone who was in mainland China within the past 14 days.

    Has it been 15 days since your mainland China visit?

    Have you been to Northern Italy in past 14 days?

    Have you been to Iran in past 14 days?

    Have you been to South Korea in past 14 days?

    Well, no self-quarantine for you! You’re fine!

    And here’s the kicker. Not only is there ZERO tracking or monitoring of anyone who has been swimming in the coronavirus stew of South Korea, Northern Italy and Iran, but let’s say that you have in fact been to one of those areas recently and now you’re feeling sick. You go to the doctor and you tell her the whole story. Both of you suspect it might be COVID-19. You’re trying to do the right thing here. You call the county health authority. You call the state health authority. You call the CDC. And then you learn the awful truth of Don’t Test, Don’t Tell.

    It’s not that testing is not available…It’s that testing is not ALLOWED.

    I’m not panicked. I am perfectly calm.

    But I am really, really pissed off.

    Because here’s the other quote from the UC Davis email that I’d like you to pay close attention to:

    When the patient arrived [Wednesday], the patient had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition. … On Sunday, the CDC ordered COVID-19 testing of the patient and the patient was put on airborne precautions and strict contact precautions.

    Translation: for four days, every healthcare professional treating this patient at UC Davis was exposed to airborne transmission of COVID-19. And so was every healthcare professional at the hospital before UC Davis. Because the CDC refused to test this patient for COVID-19 in a timely manner, the doctors and nurses and technicians caring for this patient were put at risk.

    Sure enough:

    We are asking a small number of employees to stay home and monitor their temperature.

    This is the part of the story that we must yell at the top of our lungs.

    Don’t Test, Don’t Tell is not just hiding the true extent of COVID-19 cases in the United States.

    Don’t Test, Don’t Tell is not just perpetuating the politically corrupt “Yay, Containment!” narrative of this White House.

    Don’t Test, Don’t Tell is endangering the lives of our doctors and nurses.

    Just like in China.

    Just like in Wuhan.

    A city falls when its healthcare system is overwhelmed. A city falls when its national government fails to prepare and support its doctors and nurses. A city falls when its government is more concerned with maintaining some bullshit narrative of “Yay, Calm and Competent Control!” than in doing what is politically embarrassing but socially necessary.

    That’s EXACTLY what happened in Wuhan. More than 30% of doctors and nurses in Wuhan themselves fell victim to COVID-19, so that the healthcare system stopped being a source of healing, but became a source of infection. At which point the Chinese government effectively abandoned the city, shut it off from the rest of the country, placed more than 9 million people under house arrest, and allowed the disease to essentially burn itself out.

    And so Wuhan fell.

    The disaster that befell the citizens of Wuhan and so many other cities throughout China is not primarily a virus. The disaster is having a political regime that cares more about maintaining a self-serving narrative of control than it cares about saving the lives of its citizens.

    We must prevent that from happening here. From happening anywhere. Yes, containment has failed. But that does NOT mean the war is lost. We can absolutely do better – SO MUCH BETTER – for our citizens than China did for theirs.

    The CDC’s Don’t Test, Don’t Tell policy came crashing down last night. So did Trump’s “buh, buh the flu” and “Yay, Containment!” narratives.

    Now let’s get to work preparing for the fight to come.

    Not in panic. Not in fear. But with resolve, sacrifice and righteous anger for those who would use us instrumentally for their own political ends.

    Clear eyes. Full hearts. Can’t lose.


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 18:00

  • Iran Blasts US Offer To Help Fight Coronavirus As "Political-Psychological Game"
    Iran Blasts US Offer To Help Fight Coronavirus As “Political-Psychological Game”

    Washington momentarily put aside the fact that it’s essentially at war with Iran and in a very rare moment actually offered to “help” Iran combat the rapidly spreading and deadly coronavirus according to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Friday.

    “We have made offers to the Islamic Republic of Iran to help, and we’ve made it clear to others around the world and in the region that assistance, humanitarian assistance to push back against the coronavirus in Iran is something the United States of America fully supports,” Pompeo said.

    Pompeo clarified after the hearing to reporters that the offer of support was made “to the Iranian people” and “formally conveyed to Iran through the government of Switzerland,” The Hill reported.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Despite Iran’s official death toll now standing at multiple dozens, rising to 43 as of Saturday morning, with a total number of infected at 593 (though the true numbers of infected are believed to be in the thousands or possibly tens of thousands), the Islamic Republic’s leaders promptly mocked Pompeo’s claim to have extended a hand of “support”. 

    Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman Abbas Mousav on Friday slammed America’s offer as “ridiculous,” according to the Mehr news agency.

    “The claim to help Iran in dealing with corona from a country who with their economic terrorism has created widespread pressure for the people of Iran and even closed the paths for buying medicine and medical equipment, is a ridiculous claim and a political-psychological game,” Mousavi said.

    Meanwhile, a number of reports have analyzed the impact of US sanctions on Iran’s coronavirus crisis – the hardest hit country outside of China – and concluded the US administration’s punitive attempt to devastate the Iranian economy is a contributing factor to Covid-19’s rapid spread there. The National Interest reported that the White House has responded to this criticism by opening up humanitarian avenues. 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Image source: AP

    “The Trump administration is partially reversing course on economic sanctions that have slowed down Iran from importing coronavirus test kits as the country faces down the most deadly COVID-19 outbreak outside of East Asia,” according to the report.

    Iranian leaders have blamed Washington for the worsening crisis, given the limited ability to import virus testing kits and equipment and medicines. 

    “The U.S. Treasury announced on Thursday morning that it was lifting some terrorism-related sanctions on the Central Bank of Iran, which re-opens a channel for humanitarian trade that had been closed since September 2019,” The National Interest said further.


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 17:30

  • Meanwhile At A Costco In Brooklyn, The Hoarding Begins
    Meanwhile At A Costco In Brooklyn, The Hoarding Begins

    The same long lines that we’ve seen in China, Japan, South Korea, and across the world as people panic buy food and health supplies have started in the US.

    On Saturday, the US Surgeon General urged people to “stop buying masks,” saying on Twitter that they’re not effective in preventing the general public from catching coronavirus.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Despite the CDC telling everyone to calm down, alleged video of long lines pouring out of a Costco store in Brooklyn, New York, surfaced on YouTube Saturday afternoon.

    This angle shows hundreds of people lined up outside of the Brooklyn Costco today in the freezing cold for a chance to load up on supplies amid virus fears. 

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    This comes days after we reported Hawaiians raced to Sam’s Club and Costco to panic buy food and health supplies as virus fears surge.

    And as we noted earlier today: “The great panic of 2020 is underway” as Americans are now stocking up on supplies as a pandemic could be imminent.


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 17:00

  • Did China Close First Lab To Sequence Covid-19 Out Of Fear It Would Lose Bat Soup Narrative? 
    Did China Close First Lab To Sequence Covid-19 Out Of Fear It Would Lose Bat Soup Narrative? 

    The question we all should be asking: Why was the first medical research lab, located in Shanghai, to sequence the whole genome of Covid-19 and publicly share the data shut down? 

    The Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center & School of Public Health at Fudan University was the first lab in the world to sequence the whole genome of the virus on Jan 11. Then, the Shanghai Health Commission, one day later, on Jan 12, shuttered the lab for “rectification.” 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    “The center was not given any specific reasons why the laboratory was closed for rectification. [We have submitted] four reports [asking for permission] to reopen, but we have not received any replies,” a source from the lab told the South China Morning Post (SCMP). 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The source said it wasn’t clear if the closure of the Level 3 biosafety facility was a direct result of the lab publishing virus sequence data on virological.org, an open-access virus discussion forum, and GenBank, an open-access data repository. 

    The release of the genome data on the public domain allowed researchers to develop a new test kit to diagnose the virus. By Feb 3, the lab’s Professor Zhang Yongzhen, who was responsible for the sequencing, found his data published in Nature. 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    “It was not about any individual’s achievements. It’s about having biological test kits ready in the face of a previously unknown respiratory disease, especially when a large part of the population [was] moving [across the country] during the Lunar New Year holidays,” said the source. 

    The source warned that the closure of the lab slowed down scientists and their research when they should have been developing new tools and vaccines to manage the virus outbreak, but for some reason, and it’s still unknown, the government immediately closed the lab after the genome sequence was published in the public domain. 

    “There have been applications from research institutes and universities to try drugs and compare the effects of different treatment and the development of vaccines, but [all these will have] to be turned down. Closing down the laboratory also affects the studying of the virus,” the source added.

    China’s lack of transparency since the outbreak began late last year is a significant concern. The likely reason behind the lab’s closure early last month was pressure by the Chinese government on Shanghai Health Commission to prevent the spread of scientific data to the international community that would likely debunk the official narrative that the virus came from a food market in Wuhan, China. But as we noted last week, it’s too late, and the Global Times had to admit that a “New Chinese study indicates novel coronavirus did not originate in the Huanan seafood market.”

    Even China has had to question its official narrative; the NY Post published an article which sounds very familiar to ours: “Don’t buy China’s story: The coronavirus may have leaked from a lab” in which the author writes “the evidence points to SARS-CoV-2 research being carried out at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

    As to why China pressured Shanghai to close the lab that first sequenced the virus and published it on open-access sites for the world’s scientific community to observe is that it attempted to limit information about the virus so its official narrative wouldn’t be debunked; oops too late. 


    Tyler Durden

    Sat, 02/29/2020 – 16:40

Digest powered by RSS Digest

Today’s News 29th February 2020

  • Escobar: The Afghanistan "Peace Deal" Riddle
    Escobar: The Afghanistan “Peace Deal” Riddle

    Authored by Pepe Escobar via The Asia Times,

    Nearly two decades after the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan post-9/11, and after an interminable war costing over $ 2 trillion, there’s hardly anything “historic” about a possible peace deal that may be signed in Doha this coming Saturday between Washington and the Taliban.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    We should start by stressing three points.

    1- The Taliban wanted all US troops out. Washington refused.

    2- The possible deal only reduces US troops from 13,000 to 8,600. That’s the same number already deployed before the Trump administration.

    3- The reduction will only happen a year and a half from now – assuming what’s being described as a truce holds.

    So there would be no misunderstanding, Taliban Deputy Leader Sirajuddin Haqqani, in an op-ed certainly read by everyone inside the Beltway, detailed their straightforward red line: total US withdrawal.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    And Haqqani is adamant: there’s no peace deal if US troops stay.

    Still, a deal looms. How come? Simple: enter a series of secret “annexes.”

    The top US negotiator, the seemingly eternal Zalmay Khalilzad, a remnant of the Clinton and Bush eras, has spent months codifying these annexes – as confirmed by a source in Kabul currently not in government but familiar with the negotiations.

    Let’s break them down to four points.

    1- US counter-terror forces would be allowed to stay. Even if approved by the Taliban leadership, this would be anathema to the masses of Taliban fighters.

    2- The Taliban would have to denounce terrorism and violent extremism. That’s rhetorical, not a problem.

    3- There will be a scheme to monitor the so-called truce while different warring Afghan factions discuss the future, what the US State Dept. describes as “intra-Afghan negotiations.” Culturally, as we’ll see later, Afghans of different ethnic backgrounds will have a tremendously hard time monitoring their own warring.

    4- The CIA would be allowed to do business in Taliban-controlled areas. That’s an even more hardcore anathema. Everyone familiar with post-9/11 Afghanistan knows that the prime reason for CIA business is the heroin rat line that finances Langley’s black ops, as I exposed in 2017.

    Otherwise, everything about this “historic” deal remains quite vague.

    Even Secretary of Defense Mark Esper was forced to admit the war in Afghanistan is “still” in “a state of strategic stalemate.”

    As for the far from strategic financial disaster, one just needs to peruse the latest SIGAR report. SIGAR stands for Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. In fact virtually nothing in Afghanistan has been “reconstructed.”

    No real deal without Iran

    The “intra-Afghan” mess starts with the fact that Ashraf Ghani eventually was declared the winner of the presidential elections held in September last year. But virtually no one recognizes him.

    The Taliban don’t talk to Ghani. Only to some people that are part of the government in Kabul. And they describe these talks at best as between “ordinary Afghans.”

    Everyone familiar with Taliban strategy knows US/NATO troops will never be allowed to stay. What could happen is the Taliban allowing some sort of face-saving contingent to remain for a few months, and then a very small contingent stays to protect the US embassy in Kabul.

    Washington will obviously reject this possibility. The alleged “truce” will be broken. Trump, pressured by the Pentagon, will send more troops. And the infernal spiral will be back on track.

    Another major hole in the possible deal is that the Americans completely ignored Iran in their negotiations in Doha.

    That’s patently absurd. Teheran is a key strategic partner to its neighbor Kabul. Apart from the millenary historical/cultural/social connections, there are at least 3.5 million Afghan refugees in Iran.

    Post 9-11, Tehran slowly but surely started cultivating relations with the Taliban – but not at a military/weaponizing level, according to Iranian diplomats. In Beirut last September, and then in Nur-Sultan in November, I was provided a clear picture of where discussions about Afghanistan stand.

    The Russian connection to the Taliban goes through Tehran. Taliban leaders have frequent contacts with the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. Only last year, Russia held two conferences in Moscow between Taliban political leaders and mujahideen. The Russians were engaged into bringing Uzbeks into the negotiations. At the same time, some Taliban leaders met with Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) operatives four times in Tehran, in secret.

    The gist of all these discussions was “to find a conflict resolution outside of Western patterns”, according to an Iranian diplomat. They were aiming at some sort of federalism: the Taliban plus the mujahideen in charge of the administration of some vilayets.

    The bottom line is that Iran has better connections in Afghanistan than Russia and China. And this all plays within the much larger scope of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. The Russia-China strategic partnership wants an Afghan solution coming from inside the SCO, of which both Iran and Afghanistan are observers. Iran may become a full SCO member if it holds on to the nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, until October – thus still not subjected to UN sanctions.

    All these actors want US troops out – for good. So the solution always points towards a decentralized federation. According to an Afghan diplomat, the Taliban seem ready to share power with the Northern Alliance. The spanner in the works is the Hezb-e-Islami, with one Jome Khan Hamdard, a commander allied with notorious mujahid Gulbudiin Hekmatyar, based in Mazar-i-Sharif and supported by Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, more interested in restarting a civil war.

    Understanding Pashtunistan

    Here’s a blast from the past, reliving the context of the Taliban visit to Houston, and showing how things have not changed much since the first Clinton administration. It’s always a matter of the Taliban getting their cut – at the time related to Pipelineistan business, now to their reaffirmation of what can be described as Pashtunistan.

    Not every Pashtun is a Taliban, but the overwhelming majority of Taliban are Pashtuns.

    The Washington establishment never did their “know your enemy” homework, trying to understand how Pashtuns from extremely diverse groups are linked by a common system of values establishing their ethnic foundation and necessary social rules. That’s the essence of their code of conduct – the fascinating, complex Pashtunwali. Although it incorporates numerous Islamic elements, Pashtunwali is in total contradiction with Islamic law on many points.

    Islam did introduce key moral elements to Pashtun society. But there are also juridical norms, imposed by a hereditary nobility, that support the whole edifice and that came from the Turko-Mongols.

    Pashtuns – a tribal society – have a deep aversion to the Western concept of the state. Central power can only expect to neutralize them with – to put it bluntly – bribes. That’s what passes as a sort of system of government in Afghanistan. Which brings the question of how much – and with what – the US is now bribing the Taliban.

    Afghan political life, in practice, works out from actors that are factions, sub-tribes, “Islamic coalitions” or regional groups.

    Since 1996, and up to 9/11, the Taliban incarnated the legitimate return of Pashtuns as the dominant element in Afghanistan. That’s why they instituted an emirate and not a republic, more appropriate for a Muslim community ruled only by religious legislation. The diffidence towards cities, particularly Kabul, also expresses the sentiment of Pashtun superiority over other Afghan ethnic groups.

    The Taliban do represent a process of overcoming tribal identity and the affirmation of Pashtunistan. The Beltway never understood this powerful dynamic – and that’s one of the key reasons for the American debacle.

    Lapis Lazuli corridor

    Afghanistan is at the center of the new American strategy for Central Asia, as in “expand and maintain support for stability in Afghanistan” coupled with an emphasis to “encourage connectivity between Central Asia and Afghanistan.”

    In practice, the Trump administration wants the five Central Asian “stans” to bet on integration projects such as the CASA-1000 electricity project and the Lapis Lazuli trade corridor, which is in fact a reboot of the Ancient Silk Road, connecting Afghanistan to Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan and Georgia before crossing the Black Sea to Turkey and then all the way to the EU.

    But the thing is Lapis Lazuli is already bound to integrate with Turkey’s Middle Corrido r, which is part of the New Silk Roads, or Belt and Road Initiative, as well as with the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor Plus, also part of Belt and Road. Beijing planned this integration way before Washington.

    The Trump administration is just stressing the obvious: a peaceful Afghanistan is essential for the integration process.

    Andrew Korybko correctly argues that “Russia and China could make more progress on building the Golden Ring between themselves, Pakistan, Iran, and Turkey by that time, thus ‘embracing’ Central Asia with potentially limitless opportunities that far surpass those that the US is offering or ‘encircling’ the region from a zero-sum American strategic perspective and ‘forcing’ it out.”

    The late Zbigniew “Grand Chessboard” Brzezinski’s wishful thinking “Eurasian Balkans” scenario may be dead, but the myriad US divide-and-rule gambits imposed on the heartland have now mutated into hybrid war explicitly directed against China, Russia and Iran – the three major nodes of Eurasia integration.

    And that means that as far as realpolitik Afghanistan is concerned, with or without a deal, the US military have no intention to go anywhere. They want to stay – whatever it takes. Afghanistan is a priceless Greater Middle East base to deploy hybrid war techniques.

    Pashtuns are certainly getting the message from key Shanghai Cooperation Organization players. The question is how they plan to run rings around Team Trump.


    Tyler Durden

    Fri, 02/28/2020 – 23:45

  • "This Is Serious" – Virus Hunter Who Discovered Ebola Discusses 'Worst-Case Scenario' For Coronavirus
    “This Is Serious” – Virus Hunter Who Discovered Ebola Discusses ‘Worst-Case Scenario’ For Coronavirus

    As the coronavirus becomes the all-consuming news story of the moment, the Financial Times decided to invite an extremely apropos guest for this weekend’s “Lunch with the FT”. That guest is: Belgian scientist Peter Piot, the “Mick Jagger of Microbes”, best known for discovering the Ebola virus.

    Obviously well-qualified, how does Piot feel about COVID-19? He didn’t mince words: “This is serious.”

    “I’m not the scaremongering type,” he says. “But I think this is serious in the sense that we can’t afford not to consider it as a serious threat.”

    “It could be that, indeed, it’s going to be over in a few months,” he continues, crunching into a tempura-covered sage leaf. “But just take the counterfactual. We say, ‘OK, it’s fine and we don’t do anything.’ I bet that we would already have had far more cases in Singapore, the UK, Germany. Let’s not forget, we are already well over 1,000 deaths. That’s not a detail.”

    The interview took place on Feb. 13, which means that since Piot made these comments, 1,500 more people have died, and serious outbreaks have emerged in Iran, South Korea and Italy. Saudi Arabia has halted pilgrimages to Mecca, and Japanese PM Shinzo Abe has asked all schools in the country to close.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    As the discussion delved deeper into the subject of the outbreak, Piot pointed out that although this “certainly isn’t SARS” it spreads much more easily because it resides in the tissues of the throat, allowing it to be spread through the air more easily.

    With all this in mind, the “big question”, as Piot sees it, is how many will ultimately be infected.

    “Now, let’s say, the mortality rate is 1 per cent. So, the big question is, how many people will get infected? Are we talking about hundreds of thousands or millions? Now 1 per cent of one million is 10,000; that’s 10,000 people who will die,” he says.

    “It’s clearly not Sars,” he continues, referring to severe acute respiratory syndrome, which killed nearly one in 10 who contracted it 17 years ago. “That’s the good news. But the bad news is, it spreads much faster. The Sars virus sits deep in your lungs. With this virus, it seems that it’s in your throat and that’s why it’s far more contagious.”

    But since there is no vaccine, Piot pointed out that if it things do get bad, we’re screwed, since we only have “medieval” methods of containment at our disposal.

    “Secondly, we have no vaccine. All we have is medieval ways of containment: isolation, quarantine, contact tracing.”

    Piot then offered an interesting comparison to the AIDS outbreak. He recalls that, back in 1981, when the first AIDS cases were discovered among six or seven gay men in California, nobody expected it to go on to infect 75 million people.

    In situations like this, he adds, it’s always better to overreact than to dismiss the threat.

    Piot remembers hearing about the first cases of a mysterious virus in Los Angeles in 1981. “The first report of HIV was six or seven gay men in California. Cumulatively, now we have, like, 75m people who have been infected. Who would have thought that then? Nobody. I’d rather be accused of overreacting than of not doing my job.”

    After exchanging some comments about the food, the epidemiologist explained to his FT interlocutor why he doesn’t begrudge the WHO for ‘going easy’ on China.

    He praises the role of the World Health Organization, which he says is nimbler under Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, an Ethiopian and its first African director. Dr Tedros has been criticised for going easy on China, which suppressed information in the early stages of the outbreak. “The dilemma is he could have his five minutes of fame by bashing China. But what happens afterwards? You need to work with them,” he says, scooping up some juicy borlotti beans.

    As for what will happen with the outbreak in China? Piot suspects the situation will get “much worse” before it gets better.

    What’s the worst-case scenario with coronavirus, I ask. “That we’ll have a pandemic,” he replies. “I think it will get much worse in China. And here we will see more and more transmission. That’s my gut feeling. But how big it’s going to be, I honestly don’t know.”

    He actually has some experience in this department: When he was battling the spread of AIDS in 2002 as the head of UNAids, the United Nations-backed NGO dedicated to fighting the global outbreak, he made the mistake of publicly criticizing China about the number of AIDS cases going unreported.

    “It’s a fine line. I learnt this the hard way,” he says, referring to 2002 when UNAids, the organisation he ran from 1995 to 2008, issued the so-called “Titanic Peril” report, which argued that China had many more cases of HIV than it was admitting. “It’s the only time that my then boss, Kofi Annan, called me on a Sunday afternoon. He said, ‘Peter, you’re a brave man, but nobody has ever won against the People’s Republic of China.'”

    Though he also eventually convinced the CCP to make some progressive policy changes to contain an AIDS outbreak.

    “Wen asked me, ‘What’s the situation, what should we do?’ And I thought, you have 10 seconds to think. Am I going to be diplomatic or am I going to say the truth? He must have seen it. He said, ‘Forget who I am. Forget that we’re the Communist party. Tell me what you think and I’ll see what I can do.’ Piot advised Beijing to be more open about the problem and to work with people who were vulnerable, including drug addicts and sex workers, rather than jailing them. China’s policy changed decisively after that encounter.

    Overall, in Piot’s estimation, the world has done a decent job of recognizing the threat posed by pandemics. Still, there’s still plenty of room for improvement, as the epidemic is showing the world, particularly now that the issue of mask shortages is becoming a problem in the US after playing a major role in exacerbating the outbreak in China.

    Piot thinks differently. “If we do nothing, then that’s the case,” he says, particularly since new viruses – as coronavirus appears to have done – can always jump from animal to human. But these days far more people die of non-communicable diseases than of infectious ones, he says.

    “Collectively, we’ve done quite a good job. That’s why we need, how to say it, a fire brigade,” he says, of a stronger and better-prepared global health system. “You don’t set up a fire brigade when your house is already on fire.”

    That’s a catchy line. Hopefully, once the dust settles, the global community will remember that this wasn’t the first global pandemic, and it likely won’t be the last.


    Tyler Durden

    Fri, 02/28/2020 – 23:25

  • Is Wall Street Behind The Delay In Declaring The Covid-19 Outbreak A "Pandemic"?
    Is Wall Street Behind The Delay In Declaring The Covid-19 Outbreak A “Pandemic”?

    Authored by Whitney Webb via MintPressNews.com,

    A little known specialized bond created in 2017 by the World Bank may hold the answer as to why U.S. and global health authorities have declined to label the global spread of the novel coronavirus a “pandemic.”

    Those bonds, now often referred to as “pandemic bonds,” were ostensibly intended to transfer the risk of potential pandemics in low-income nations to financial markets.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Yet, in light of the growing coronavirus outbreak, the investors who purchased those products could lose millions if global health authorities were to use that label in relation to the surge in global coronavirus cases.

    On Tuesday, federal health officials at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced that they are preparing for a “potential pandemic” of the novel coronavirus that first appeared in China late last year. The World Health Organization (WHO) has stated that an estimated 80,000 worldwide have contracted the disease, most of them in China, while more than 2,700 have died.

    However, some have argued that the CDC’s concerns about a likely pandemic have come too late and that action should have been taken much earlier. For instance, in early February, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, had told the New York Times that the novel coronavirus is “very, very transmissible, and it almost certainly is going to be a pandemic,” while former CDC director Dr. Thomas R. Frieden had echoed those concerns at the time, stating that it is “increasingly unlikely that the virus can be contained.”

    Despite those warnings, among many others, the CDC waited to announce its concerns that the virus could spread throughout the United States. Their Tuesday announcement riled markets, wiping out $1.7 trillion in stock market value in just two days. The CDC’s warning has reportedly angered President Trump, who accused the agency of needlessly spooking financial markets.

    Notably, WHO officials have taken an even more cautious approach than the CDC in their recent comments, stating that it is still “too early” to declare the coronavirus outbreak a “pandemic” while also asserting that “it is time to do everything you would do in preparing for a pandemic.”

    The refusal to label the outbreak a pandemic is odd, since it refers to an epidemic or actively spreading disease that affects two or more regions worldwide. This currently describes the geographical spread of the highly contagious novel coronavirus, which has now resulted in significant clusters of cases far from China, namely in Italy and Iran. Countries closer to China, like South Korea, have also recently experienced an explosion in novel coronavirus infections.

    It is possible that concerns over using the word “pandemic” could upset global markets and lead to economic turmoil, similar to what happened to the U.S. stock market following the CDC announcement on Tuesday. Though such concerns are valid, there is also evidence that a particular class of bonds issued by the World Bank that are closely related to official declarations of pandemics may also be responsible for having steered WHO and CDC officials away from using this term, even though the consequences of doing so could negatively impact global public health.

    Pandemic Bonds: a “scheme like no other”

    In June 2017, the World Bank announced the creation of “specialized bonds” that would be used to fund the previously created Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility (PEF) in the event of an officially-recognized (i.e. WHO-recognized) pandemic.

    They were essentially sold under the premise that those who invested in the bonds would lose their money if any of six deadly pandemics hit, including coronavirus. Yet, if a pandemic did not occur before the bonds mature on July 15, 2020, investors would receive what they had originally paid for the bonds back in addition to interest and premium payments on those bonds that they recieve between the date of purchase and the bond’s maturation date.

    The PEF, which these pandemic bonds fund, was created by the World Bank “to channel surge funding to developing countries facing the risk of a pandemic” and the creation of these so-called “pandemic bonds” was intended to transfer pandemic risk in low-income countries to global financial markets. According to a World Bank press release on the launch of the bonds, WHO backed the World Bank’s initiative.

    However, there is much more to these “pandemic bonds” than meets the eye. For example, PEF has a “unique financing structure [that] combines funding from the bonds issued today with over-the-counter derivatives that transfer pandemic outbreak risk to derivative counterparties.” The World Bank asserted that this structure was used in order “to attract a wider, more diverse set of investors.”

    Critics, however, have called the unnecessarily convoluted system “World-Bank-enabled looting” that enriches intermediaries and investors instead of the funds intended targets, in this case low-income countries struggling to fight a pandemic. These critics have asked why not merely give these funds to a body like the Contingency Fund for Emergencies at the World Health Organization (WHO), where the funds could go directly to affected countries in need.

    Notably, WHO determines if a pandemic meets the criteria that would see investors’ money be funneled into PEF as opposed to their own pockets, which would take place if no pandemic is declared between now and when the bonds are set to mature this upcoming July.

    In 2017, the news site Quartz described the mechanism of “pandemic bonds” as follows:

    Investors buy the bonds and receive regular coupons payments in return. If there is an outbreak of disease, the investors don’t get their initial money back. There are two varieties of debt, both scheduled to mature in July 2020.

    The first bond raised $225 million and features an interest rate of around 7%. Payout on the bond is suspended if there is an outbreak of new influenza viruses or coronaviridae (SARS, MERS). The second, riskier bond raised $95 million at an interest rate of more than 11%. This bond keeps investors’ money if there is an outbreak of Filovirus, Coronavirus, Lassa Fever, Rift Valley Fever, and/or Crimean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever. The World Bank also issued $105 million in swap derivatives that work in a similar way. (emphasis added)”

    In 2017, the World Bank issued $425 million in these “pandemic bonds” and the bond sale was reported to have been 200 percent oversubscribed, “with investors eager to get their hands on the high-yield returns on offer,” according to reports. The premiums bondholders have received thus far were largely funded by the governments of Japan and Germany, who are also the top nation-state funders of WHO behind the United States and United Kingdom. Reports have claimed that most of the bondholders are firms and individuals based in Europe.

    Some analysts have argued that these pandemic bonds were never intended to aid low-income pandemic-stricken countries, but instead to enrich Wall Street investors. For instance, American economic forecaster Martin Armstrong has called the World Bank’s pandemic bonds “a giant gamble in the global financial casino” and a “scheme like no other,” recently arguing that these bonds could present a “a structured derivative time bomb” that could upend financial markets if a pandemic is declared by WHO. Armstrong went on to say that it is in WHO’s interest to declare the coronavirus outbreak a pandemic, but noted that, in doing so, they would cause bondholders to take significant losses.

    Even establishment economists like former World Bank chief economist and Secretary of Treasury Larry Summers have criticized the World Bank’s program, dismissing the PEF as “financial goofiness.” Bodo Ellmers, the director of the Global Policy Forum’s sustainable development finance program, has similarly called pandemic bonds “useless,” while Olga Jonas, who worked at the World Bank as an economist for over 30 years, said the program was “designed to fail” because the bonds were crafted in order “to reduce the probability of payout.”

    Economic and business analyst and host of the podcast “Quoth the Raven” Chris Irons told MintPress News that, with respect to the pandemic bonds, “What’s important is to focus on who stands to benefit from this not being declared a pandemic,” a difficult task given that the identity of most bondholders are not currently publicly available.

    Irons also noted that, in his opinion, “WHO and the CDC have been caught a little flat-footed here” and that some governments that fund WHO, particularly the Trump administration, appear “more concerned with the stock market than giving people information that may be necessary and vital.” He added that behind-closed-doors pressure on WHO by those who stand to lose financially from an official declaration of a pandemic would be “unsurprising.”

    How to trigger a payout

    As the coronavirus outbreak grows, concern has grown among those invested in pandemic bonds that payout to countries affected by coronavirus will be triggered, despite the clear delay by WHO in declaring the outbreak as a pandemic. While WHO could theoretically alter the criteria that would trigger payout and cause bondholders to lose big, some recent reports have claimed that bondholders are seeking to rid themselves of the bonds prior to their July maturation date.

    German media outlet Deutsche-Welle noted that the trigger for the first class of pandemic bonds, valued at $225 million, would normally have already been met due to the criterion of more than 2,500 deaths in a “developing country.” However, WHO has said this does not meet said criterion because it does not consider China to be a developing country, even though the World Bank’s own criteria do consider China to be a developing country.

    For the second and riskier category of pandemic bonds, those bonds are triggered when the disease in question crosses an international border and causes more than 20 deaths in the second country. At the time of publication of this article, Iran has recorded at least 50 deaths, which should have triggered this second category of pandemic bonds, valued at $95 million. Yet, WHO yet to comment on how this criterion for the second category bonds has been met.

    The WHO’s decision to refuse to use the “p-word” may be the result of several factors, though the pandemic bonds loom large as a $425 million incentive for not doing so. While avoiding the use of the term may please pandemic bondholders, it is set to have major negative consequences for global public health, particularly given the fact that early action against epidemic and pandemic outbreaks is widely considered to be an imperative.


    Tyler Durden

    Fri, 02/28/2020 – 23:05

  • Oregon Officials Confirm Third Coronavirus Case "Of Unknown Origin"; Risk Of "Community Outbreak" Is High
    Oregon Officials Confirm Third Coronavirus Case “Of Unknown Origin”; Risk Of “Community Outbreak” Is High

    Summary:

    • Health authorities in Texas and Oregon report 12 new coronavirus cases in US
    • US coronavirus case total hits 63, 2nd case ‘of unknown origin’ confirmed
    • US issues travel advisory for Italy
    • Italy says first case discovered in Lazio
    • China, SK release nightly figures
    • Google says employee who visited Zurich office has coronavirus
    • France confirms 57 cases
    • Italy reports 3 deaths in Lombardy; nat’l toll now 21; total cases 821
    • Google employee tests positive for coronavirus after visiting Zurich office
    • British man becomes 6th ‘Diamond Princess’ passenger to die
    • Two Japanese dogs tested positive for coronavirus
    • Mulvaney says school closures, transit disruptions may happen in US
    • Dr. Tedros said Friday that there’s no evidence of ‘community outbreak’
    • Mexico confirms 1st virus case
    • Fauci warns virus could take ‘two years’ to develop
    • Kudlow says “no higher priority” than the “health of the American people
    • Toronto confirms another case
    • WHO says 20 vaccines in development
    • St. Louis Fed’s Bullard pours cold water on market hopes
    • Netherlands confirms 2 more
    • United cuts flights to Japan
    • Advisor to CDC says shortage of tests in US creating a “bottleneck”
    • Nigeria confirms first case in sub-saharan africa
    • SK reports more than 1,000 new cases in under 48 hours
    • Italy cases surpass 700
    • WHO says virus will ‘soon be in all countries’

    * * *

    Update (1100ET): With Washington State health officials expected to brief reporters tonight, we will hopefully have more information about the latest reported coronavirus case in the US – another case that’s believed to be “of unknown origin” – meaning it could be evidence of an emerging community outbreak.

    But before we go, we’d like to leave readers with a few thoughts courtesy of Dr. Scott Gottlieb, the former FDA director and frequent CNBC contributor.

    Remember: This shortage of coronavirus tests won’t last forever.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Sleep well.

    * * *

    Update (2230ET): China released its final coronavirus numbers late on Friday. They were roughly equivalent to yesterday’s figures.

    China’s NHC reported 427 new cases confirmed on Friday on the mainland. Once again,almost all of the cases were in Hubei province. The mainland total now stands at 79,251.

    Here’s the NHC press release (with English translation provided by the NHC):

    On Feb 28, 31 provincial-level regions on the Chinese mainland as well as the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps reported 427 new cases of confirmed infections, 248 new cases of suspected infections, and 47 deaths (45 in Hubei province, 1 in Beijing municipality, and 1 in Henan province). 2,885 patients were released from hospital after being cured. 10,193 people who had had close contact with infected patients were freed from medical observation. Serious cases decreased by 288.

    As of 24:00 on Feb 28, the National Health Commission had received 79,251 reports of confirmed cases and 2,835 deaths in 31 provincial-level regions on the Chinese mainland and the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, and in all 39,002 patients had been cured and discharged from hospital. There still remained 37,414 confirmed cases (including 7,664 in serious condition) and 1,418 suspected cases. So far, 658,587 people have been identified as having had close contact with infected patients. 58,233 are now under medical observation.

    On Feb 28, Hubei reported 423 new cases of confirmed infections (including 420 in Wuhan), 159 new cases of suspected infections (including 114 in Wuhan), and 45 deaths (including 37 in Wuhan). 2,492 patients were released from hospital after being cured, including 1,726 in Wuhan.

    As of 24:00 on Feb 28, Hubei had reported 66,337 cases of confirmed infections (including 48,557 in Wuhan) and 2,727 deaths (including 2,169 in Wuhan). In all, 28,895 patients had been cured and discharged from hospital, including 17,552 in Wuhan.There still remained 34,715 confirmed cases (including 28,836 in Wuhan), with 7,370 in serious condition (including 6,585 in Wuhan), and 1,171 suspected cases (including 788 in Wuhan).

    As of 24:00 on Feb 28, 138 confirmed infections had been reported in the Hong Kong and Macao special administrative regions and Taiwan province: 94 in Hong Kong (2 had been dead and 30 had been cured and discharged from hospital), 10 in Macao (8 had been cured and discharged from hospital) and 34 in Taiwan (1 had been dead and 9 had been cured and discharged from hospital).

    In South Korea, the total number of coronavirus cases rose to 2,931 on Saturday as 594 new cases were reported.

    As we wait to see if we’ll hear from Washington health officials tonight, here’s a copy of a press release from the Oregon Health Authority about Friday night’s press conference:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    * * *

    Update (2130ET): During the presser – which is still ongoing – Oregon officials confirmed that the case is of “unknown origin”, the third such case in the US. The individual is a Washington County resident, but has spent time at the Forest Hills elementary school in Oswego. The school will inform students and family about the risks.

    The case will remain “presumptive” until they get the test result back from Atlanta, though CDC protocols call for treating presumptive cases as legitimate cases. For the record, the Oregon state health lab was able to conduct an initial test, which came back positive.

    Amazingly, officials confirmed that the patient is still hospitalized, and has been isolated, but hasn’t been subjected to “quarantine” status. They’re reportedly being treated at a hospital in Hillsborough Oregon run by Kaiser Permanente.

    Health officials said they’re scrambling to trace the patient’s movements over the past days and weeks and ferret out anyone who might have come into contact with her during that time.

    “The most important thing to do – as mundane as it sounds – cover your face when you sneeze, wash your hands, and if you have any flu-like symptoms, stay home.”

    As far as the patient’s condition, officials wouldn’t go into specifics beyond saying that she remains “hospitalized”. Since the patient didn’t travel abroad, the assumption is that the infection was acquired “in the community.”

    The officials said they hope Oregonians would “go about their daily lives” and not let the news affect them. We suspect that might be difficult, considering that the patient hasn’t even been quarantined, and is likely only the “tip of the iceberg” when it comes to infections in the state.

    Before we go, we wanted to point out an interesting detail from the press conference: When asked by a reporter about a rumor from earlier in the week about a coronavirus patient at a Kaiser Permanente facility in the state, officials said that they believed that rumor “didn’t refer to this case” – when it’s obvious to anybody with a brain that the rumor was accurate.

    Officials insist that they’re conveying the information to the public “just hours” after finding out. But the presence of this rumor seems to contradict that. And if officials did know about the case earlier in the week (their phrasing seemed to imply that the materials for confirmation were sent to the CDC in Atlanta days), why did they wait to tell the public?

    * * *

    Update (2045ET): Any reporters who were hoping for a quiet night relatively free of coronavirus news, well, those hopes have unfortunately been dashed.

    Because in a major bombshell that seriously undercuts President Trump’s ‘everything is under control’ message from his big press conference Wednesday night, state health authorities in Oregon and Texas reported a combined 12 new cases of the virus.

    This is in addition to two new cases that were confirmed earlier on Friday, and brings the total number of cases confirmed in the US to 74.

    11 new cases have been confirmed by federal officials, according to local media reports.

    The new cases include nine from the Diamond Princess cruise ship, one from the Wuhan group of quarantined passengers, and one that was transferred from the Marine Corps Air Station Miramar in San Diego.

    City officials in San Antonio insisted that the risk of infection remains very low, since the patients have all been under mandatory quarantine. Another 145 people are still quarantined at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland. Ninety Americans evacuated from Wuhan were released after finishing their quarantine without contracting the virus, said the CDC’s Nancy Knight during a Thursday news conference in Austin led by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott.

    Meanwhile, state officials in Oregon announced the state’s first “presumptive” case of the virus (“presumptive” since the CDC’s strict protocols often delay – or prevent – testing in at-risk patients, as we discussed earlier, as well as in an update from last night).

    State officials are holding a press conference to disclose more details beginning at 9 PM ET.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Watch live below:

    Outside of the US, Mexico confirmed its second case (though it also hedged by calling it a “presumptive” case), this time in Sinaloa – which is bad news for the drug cartels. Iraqi authorities reported the first case in Baghdad. Also, in South Korea, the number of new cases exploded again on Friday, with authorities warning that the next batch of confirmations will likely bring total cases above 3k.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Once again, China reported only a handful of cases outside Hubei.

    • CHINA REPORTS 427 ADDL CORONAVIRUS CASES FEB. 28
    • CHINA HUBEI REPORTS 423 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES FEB. 28

    Over the past day or so, a series of critical reports knocked the CDC’s strict testing protocols, blaming them for delaying the confirmation of Cali’s second coronavirus case of “unknown origin” by up to a week. Well, one Reddit user posted an anonymous account of their experience after they returned from a week in Japan and reported to a hospital after developing suspicious symptoms.

    Since he didn’t display the “most serious” symptoms (like shortness of breath which could signify advanced pneumonia) he wasn’t even allotted a test, and told the individual that they were free to “ride the subway, return to work, do whatever I want” even as their doctor “disagreed” and advised them to stay home in a self-quarantine.

    President Trump better pray this thing dies out soon, because it looks like his administration is already repeating some of the same mistakes made by Japan.

    * * *

    Update (1730ET): Health officials in Santa Clara County have confirmed the county’s third case of COVID-19, bringing to total case count for the US to 63.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Shortly after officials made the case public, the Washington Post revealed that the female patient is 65 years old and has no known history of travel to countries hit hard by the outbreak, which means she’s the second case “of unknown origin” in the state.

    This means that the odds of a more widespread outbreak in California is extremely possible. As Jennifer Nuzzo, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, told WaPo: Two separate cases of community transmission likely means that there are others in the United States, said Jennifer Nuzzo, senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

    “I think there’s a strong possibility that there’s local transmission going in California. In other words, the virus is spreading within California, and I think there’s a possibility other states are in the same boat. They just haven’t recognized that yet,” she said.

     

    Meanwhile, over in Italy, the first case of the coronavirus has been reported in Lazio, a region in central Italy, showing that the virus is spreading across Italy.

    The US has issued a travel advisory for Italy, which should encourage some travelers to cancel their trips since many travel and hospitality companies won’t refund an individual’s money without at least a level 3 advisory.

    Trump had no problem angering the Chinese by imposing a ban on anybody traveling from China or who had recently visited China. But he has appeared to be more cautious about pissing off his European allies, who have opposed travel bans and border closures in what seems like a misguided commitment to their principles of ‘openness’.

    Then again…

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Earlier on Friday, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio and city health officials said that they were ‘frustrated’ by the CDC’s strict testing protocols which reportedly prevented the city from running its own tests, extending the time it takes to clear a patient by days. 

    Officials blamed an obscure bureaucratic quirk for the decision, and said the CDC should move to rectify it. De Blasio insisted that city has the resources and facilities, but hasn’t received the OK from the CDC, for some reason.

    “We have the facilities; they are underutilized by the CDC,” de Blasio said.

    NYC Health Commissioner Dr. Oxiris Barbot said this was because of the city’s inability to carry out a final validation step in the testing sequence. However, she said “there are specific procedures in place so every time the test is run, it’s valid…issues were found with the third component.

    So it sounds like us like de Blasio trying to blame the Trump Administration for the shortcomings of NYC’s public-health emergency response system.

    * * *

    Update (1610ET): Another wild market session has ended, cementing the worst run for equities since the financial crisis.

    As for virus-related news heading into the close, well, there really wasn’t a ton. CNN reports that Kenya’s High Court has ordered all 239 passengers who recently arrived in Nairobi on a flight from Guangzhou into a mandatory quarantine at a Kenya Defense Forces base, or a guarded medical facility.

    Following the cancellation of joint military exercises between the US and South Korea, along with reports that an American serviceman was infected in South Korea, the Pentagon has warned that the coronavirus poses an “Increased threat” in certain areas where US troops are stationed around the world (but…mostly in South Korea). Notably, the warning breaks from the administration’s insistence that “everything is under control.”

    The travel industry is the latest to be hit by cancellations as its largest trade group cancelled its annual trade show due to the virus. The event, called ITB Berlin, had been due to attract 160,000 attendees beginning on Wednesday. But it was canceled by city authorities in Berlin.

    In other unfortunate news impacting the travel industry, the Global Business Travel Association estimated in a new report that the coronavirus outbreak could cost the industry as much as $46.6 billion per month, which translates to $559.7 billion annually, the Washington Post reports.

    A couple of hours after BI revealed that a Google employee had been infected with the coronavirus, media reports are now claiming two employees at Intesa Sanpaolo, the Italian banking group, have also been stricken.

    * * *

    Update (1350ET): A Google employee who was recently in the company’s Zurich office has tested positive for the coronavirus, Business Insider reports.

    In response, Google has instituted travel advisories for all employees. Google said it would take all necessary measures advised by public health officials. So far, all Google offices – including the office in Zurich – remain open.

    • GOOGLE IS PREVENTING EMPLOYEES FROM TRAVELING TO IRAN, AS WELL AS TO 2 ITALIAN REGIONS WHERE VIRUS IS SPREADING, LOMBARDY AND VENETO- BUSINESS INSIDER
    • GOOGLE WILL BAN EMPLOYEES FROM TRAVELING TO SOUTH KOREA AND JAPAN- BUSINESS INSIDER

    It’s unclear whether this case was included in the US total, or where that employee is now – if they’ve left Zurich or traveled anywhere, like to the US, for example. Switzerland has fewer than 20 confirmed cases.

    Meanwhile, France confirmed that it’s total confirmed cases just climbed to 57 as the French health minister says the virus is now “circulating” in French territory, and that some schools will be kept closed after holiday in the Oise region because of virus-related worries.

    * * *

    Update (1330ET): In a company-wide memo, Amazon instructed all of its employees to avoid ‘nonessential’ travel within the US. Though many companies have been cancelling events and conferences while issuing travel warnings, this is one of the more extreme warnings we’ve seen, CNBC reports.

    Perhaps Jeff Bezos’ animosity toward Trump has something to do with it?

    As President Trump insists that investors are more worried about Bernie Sanders’ and his ‘democratic’ Communist Revolution, here’s a chart that might offer some insights on what’s inspiring the market’s mentality.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    * * *

    Update (1240ET): The CDC’s Dr. Messonier announced two new cases of the coronavirusin the US on Friday afternoon, confirming that the number of Americans infected aboard the ‘Diamond Princess’ has climbed to 44.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    It’s just the latest sign how bad the shortage of coronavirus tests has gotten. Addressing the issue, Dr. Messonier admitted that the situation with the tests has been suboptimal, but that the CDC hopes to have it cleared up by early next week.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Dr. Messonier

    So expect the ‘official’ US total to shoot higher after that.

    * * *

    Update (1210ET): Italian health authorities just confirmed three more deaths in Lombardy, bringing the national death toll to 21, while the number of confirmed cases rises by nearly 200 to 821.

    Italy now has the third-largest death toll, behind only Iran and mainland China.

    * * *

    Update (1145ET): Reports are claiming a vote on the emergency spending bill to combat the virus could come as soon as next week, which is earlier than the week of March 9, as was previously reported.

    * * *

    Update (1130ET): The People’s Daily reports that Beijing is tightening its “entrant management” – which we believe means it’s once again restricting who can and cannot enter the city – as the government continues to implement measures to suppress outbreaks even as Beijing insists the virus has finally been ‘contained’.

    * * *

    Update (1120ET): Infectious-disease expert Anthony Fauci, who has been one of the federal government’s main spokespeople on the timeline for developing a vaccine, said Friday that it could take “up to two years” for a vaccine to be market-ready, according to Rep. Jan Schakowsky, Dem of Illinois. Notably, that’s a longer timeline than the 1 year to 18 months that Fauci and HHS Secretary Alex Azar shared earlier in the week.

    * * *

    Update (1115ET): Ontario has confirmed another coronavirus case in Toronto, the first since an Iranian passenger aboard an Air Canada flight to Montreal tested positive earlier this week.

    * * *

    Update (1100ET): As the left attacks the Trump Administration’s virus response, Trump has dispatched one of his top TV defenders, top economic advisor Larry Kudlow, to drive home the message that the White House has “no higher priority” than “the health of the American people.”

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Kudlow added that 6 of the 15 coronavirus patients in the US have been released.

    His statement follows a barrage of criticism from Trump’s political opponents claiming his decision to task Mike Pence and Alex Azar with leading the containment effort suggests the president is m ore concerned about the economic fallout, and protecting his own image.

    Speaking to the press corp., Kudlow sounded less like he was trying to jawbone the markets higher and more like he was trying to understand why the selloff has become so ‘overdone’, as he sees it.

    The WHO said in a report published Friday morning that the global community “is not yet ready to implement measures that have contianed the coronavirus in China,” while Dr. Tedros reiterated his view that the “window of opportunity” for stopping a ‘pandemic’ is narrowing every day.

    More importantly, Kudlow insisted that the outbreak wouldn’t have much of a long-term impact on the market.

    “I just don’t think at this point that it’s going to have much of an impact,” Kudlow said.

    Asked what advice he would give a friend planning a cruise, Kudlow responded “stay home.”

    Questions about yesterday’s Trump news presser prompted Kudlow to praise the president – saying “the way he is handling this” will help his reelection. He also said he’s not expecting any “precipitous action” on China tariffs.

    As for complaints about Pence asking all CDC officials to route all decisions and every through his office, Kudlow insisted that the administration wasn’t trying to “stifle” or cover up anyone.

    “No one is being stifled, no one is being told what to say…we are all ears we want to hear what they have to say,” Kudlow said. “I think you have to coordinate.”

    Countries need to understand that they must contain the virus, even if it requires seemingly draconian measures, and while coronavirus cases might increase in the US, it’s unlikely that they will “skyrocket.”

    Finally, the WHO has raised its global alert rating to “Very High” from “High” as it continues to do and say everything that would suggest COVID-19 has become a global pandemic, if if the WHO refuses to acknowledge it (with reason). “Very high” is the last level of the WHO risk assessment short of “pandemic.”

    * * *

    Update (1030ET): WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, better known as Dr. Tedros, said Friday that the WHO has seen no evidence of the type of “community transmission” that the CDC warned about. There’s no evidence that the virus is spreading freely in communities, even though seven countries have reported their first cases over the last 24 hours. 

    He added that there are more than 20 vaccines in development, and that several therapeutics are in clinical trials. The first results are expected in a few weeks, Dr. Tedros said. The spread from both Italy (which has spread cases across Europe) and Iran (which has leaked the virus to its Persian Gulf neighbors) is “concerning”. The WHO added that it has found “no evidence” that the virus will react differently in different climates.

    CDC Director Redfield then added that risks from the virus across the US remain “low.”

    As the market awaits some kind of coordinated central-bank response, perhaps Sunday evening around the time futures open, the Fed’s Jim Bullard said the adjustment to US GDP growth expectations “doesn’t look that severe”, but that he would be willing to act if he saw evidence of a “very severe” economic hit. In other words, Bullard is pouring cold water on the market’s only source of optimism with the Dow off by 1,000 points intraday for the third time this week.

    Fortunately, Bullard won’t have a vote on the FOMC until 2022 (though it’s telling that even the doves at the Fed are skeptical of an ’emergency’ rate cut).

    * * *

    Update (1020ET): CNBC’s Eunice Yoon sent a handful of informative tweets, reminding the world that the outbreak in China isn’t over yet (while suggesting that two more patients reported re-infection in China).

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Yoon has been reporting from Beijing this entire time, and her feed has been a source of some of the best reporting from the capital.

    * * *

    Update (1014ET): Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney acknowledged on Friday that the coronavirus outbreak is likely to disrupt everyday life in the US, with possible school closures and public transit disruptions included on the list of potential annoyances.

    “Are you going to see some schools shut down? Probably. Maybe see impacts on public transportation? Sure, but we do this. We know how to handle this,” Mulvaney said Friday during an appearance at CPAC, which, notably, did not cancel for fear of the outbreak.

    If you want to read more about how the US outbreak might impact schools, the New York Times wrote a story about what the outbreak might mean for US schools yesterday.

    The CDC’s Dr. Nancy Messonnier stressed the need for companies and schools to develop strategies for keeping employees and students at home during a presser a few days ago.

    * * *

    Update (0950ET): Nigeria’s top public health official said Friday that the country is “more than capable” of dealing with the outbreak.

    “Nigeria is ready,” Chikwe Ihekweazu said. “We successfully managed Ebola and we manage outbreaks all the time and are currently managing Lassa fever. We have a strong team that is used to doing this.”

    United Airlines announced plans to change its flight schedule to Japan now that coronavirus fears are impacting travel and tourism to the world’s third-largest economy.

    Here are the specific flights affected:

    • Los Angeles to Tokyo canceled March 8 until April 24
    • Chicago to Tokyo canceled March 8 to March 27, then switches to Chicago to Haneda on March 28
    • Haneda schedule is not affected
    • Newark to Tokyo reduction to 5 times weekly for April (from daily)
    • Honolulu to Tokyo down-gauged from 777-200 to 787-8 for April
    • San Francisco to Kansai reduction to 5 times weekly in April (from daily)
    • San Francisco to Singapore reduction to 1 time daily for March 8 until April 24 (from 2 times daily)
    • San Francisco- to Incheon reduction to 3 times weekly for March 8 until April 30 (from 1 time daily in March and 2 times daily in April)
    • San Francisco to Taiwan down-gauged from 777-300 to 787-9 for March and April.

    In the US, a longtime advisor to the CDC told CNN that the shortage of COVID-19 tests in the US has created a “bottleneck.”

    “We haven’t been able to test more broadly as many of my colleagues in infectious disease would like,” Dr. William Schaffner, medical director of the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, told CNN on Friday.

    * * *

    Update (0925ET): Japanese TV news network NHK has reported that a British man has died after becoming infected with the coronavirus aboard the cruise ship “Diamond Princess”, which was home to the largest COVID-19 outbreak outside mainland China until this week, when South Korea assumed the mantle.

    Moreover, CNN reported that the Japanese Health Ministry confirmed the death of a 79-year-old woman, who it said was the fifth passenger to die from a case of the virus contracted aboard the ‘Diamond Princess’. 10 have died from the virus in Japan.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    The man is the first Brit to die from the virus, and the first foreign passenger to die from a case linked to the Diamond Princess, and the sixth death linked to the cruise ship.

    A spokeswoman for Princess Cruises, which operates the Diamond Princess, issued a statement: “All of us at Princess Cruises, including the crew of the Diamond Princess, offer our sincere condolences to family members and friends for their loss. Our dedicated care team are on hand to provide support.”

    Speaking on CNBC Friday morning, host Jim Cramer went on an interesting rant about China deliberately infecting people to test its vaccine, before slamming the WHO for kowtowing the China, a criticism that has been widely shared. A spokesperson for the giant NGO said Friday that the virus would likely make it to most, if not all, countries.

    * * *

    Update (0900ET): Spain reported 18 new cases Friday afternoon, bringing its total to 32, although 29 of them have direct links to ‘risk zones’ abroad (including Italy in particular). 

    Still, Spanish doctors and epidemiologists haven’t been able to trace the origins of 3 cases, contributing to anxieties that the outbreak might be much larger than presently detected.

    Some 130 guests at the H10 Costa Adeje Palace hotel in Tenerifem the largest of Spain’s Canary Islands, will be allowed to leave Friday after several days on lockdown. Four hotel guests have tested positive so far, as Spain’s Health Ministry tested every guest.

    With China’s economy humming at less than 50% capacity, the Communist Party has decided to offer another 300 billion yuan (roughly $43 billion) in emergency loans to Chinese companies, particularly the SMEs who are in the most dire need of funding.

    • CHINA TO GUIDE ANOTHER 300B YUAN LOW-INTEREST LOANS AMONG AIDS

    * * *

    Update (0820ET): After several scares, Mexico has finally confirmed its first case of coronavirus, according to Mexico’s deputy health minister.

    According to Reuters, the patient recently traveled to Italy and came up positive on the initial test. His case is only the second confirmed in Latin America, outside Brazil. The patient is said to be “not in a serious condition.”

    In corporate news, following Facebook, Goldman Sachs and a host of other companies, Kraft Heinz has taken the precautionary step of postponing its March conference in Chicago. The conference was supposed to host 250 of the troubled packaged-food company’s best managers.

    * * *

    On Wednesday, the coronavirus outbreak reached a new milestone when the number of new cases confirmed in the world ex-China finally surpassed the number being confirmed on the mainland. Two days later, and we’re almost at the point where the number of Thursday new cases confirmed by Iran was roughly half the total coming out of Wuhan.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    As of Friday morning, the number of confirmed cases worldwide had passed 83,000, while the number of deaths topped 2,800.

    Since yesterday, we we first noted this chart, the number of cases outside China has soared, particularly in South Korea and across Europe, as the number of new cases in mainland China (but outside Wuhan) dropped into the single digits. Vietnam joined the group of countries restricting South Koreans from entry, announcing Friday that it would stop issuing visas for South Koreans, according to CNN.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Of course, China still had nearly two months of lead time over the rest of the world, and it has been home to the bulk of cases so far.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Here’s a rundown of deaths outside mainland China:

    Iran: 34
    Italy 17
    South Korea: 14
    Japan: 10 
    Hong Kong and France: 2 each
    The Philippines and Taiwan: 1 each

    A WHO Spokesman said Friday that the coronavirus outbreak is ‘getting bigger’, and that the possibility of it reaching some ‘if not all countries’ is something that we have warned about for a while.

    Every Brooklyn hipster who’s been living in blissful ignorance of the pandemic unfolding all around them – dismissing every new warning as ‘racist right-wing alarmism’ – is about to start paying attention: The dog of a coronavirus patient in Hong Kong has been found to carry a “low level” of the deadly virus, according to a statement from the region’s government.

    Infographic: Where COVID-19 Has Been Confirmed in the U.S. | Statista You will find more infographics at Statista

    According to the New York Post, researchers tested the dog’s nasal cavities and swabbed its mouth on Wednesday, and soon discovered that a test returned a “weak positive” for the samples.

    “At present, the [Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department] does not have evidence that pet animals can be infected with COVID-19 virus or can be a source of infection to people,” Hong Kong’s government said in a press release.

    Don’t worry, dog lovers: The animal is being quarantined in a animal shelter holding no other animals. The pooch will remain under quarantine until it tests negative. Fortunately, it doesn’t appear to be showing symptoms.

    South Korea has confirmed an additional 571 cases of the novel coronavirus so far on Friday, bringing its total to 2,337, making it the largest outbreak outside of mainland China.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country with more than 200 million people, reported the first case in Sub-Saharan Africa late Thursday night (ET). On Friday, Nigerian Health Minister Osagie Ehanire told reporters in Lagos that his government has contacted the airline on which the country’s ‘patient zero’ traveled to try and trace people he came in contact with. Lagos Health Commissioner Akin Abayomi said the patient traveled to Nigeria on Turkish Airlines flight.

    “We are not panicking,” Ehanire says. “We are not banning airlines. We have not seen the need. We are also not profiling and stigmatizing.”

    Nigerian officials offered some more details about their first case on Friday, according to Al Jazeera.

    The first confirmed case was not detected at the airport, allowing them to travel through densely populated Lagos before becoming ill and visiting a hospital, the country’s health minister said.

    The Italian man, who authorities said arrived in Nigeria from Milan on the evening of Feb. 24, had no symptoms when their plane landed.

    Authorities are now working to “meet and observe” all those who were on the flight with him, and are also identifying all the people he met and places he visited in Lagos, a giant city of 20 million.

    Perhaps the most shocking development overnight was the surge of new cases in Germany, confirming the dire warnings of health officials. Europe’s largest economy has now quarantined about 1,000 people and affirmed “about 60” cases of coronavirus across the country.

    Mexico’s streak of being the only country in North America to have rebuffed the coronavirus is about to end: The country just reported its first preliminary positive test on Friday morning, according to Bloomberg.

    as the number of confirmed cases in Switzerland slowly grows, one of the most important events for the global auto industry, the Geneva International Motor Show, has been canceled now that Swiss authorities have banned major public events.

    In Iran, authorities have nearly caught up to a lawmaker’s warning about 50 deaths  in the city of Qom earlier this week: The Islamic Republic reported 143 new cases overnight, raising the countrywide total to 388. It also reported 8 more deaths, bringing the death toll to 34.

    “Iran expects an upward trajectory in confirmed coronavirus cases in the next few days,” the health minister said.

    Singapore has become the latest country to crack down on the South Korean Christian cult at the center of that country’s outbreak.

    Moving over the commonwealth of independent states, Azerbaijan confirmed its first case on Friday, while a second case was confirmed in Georgia. Another case has been confirmed in Thailand after a long period of calm, raising the total to 41.

    German Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann said on Friday that the central bank’s official forecasts for 2020 growth were probably a little too optimistic, given the supply-side shock rocking Europe’s export powerhouse. Authorities in Germany’s Heinsberg, which is situated near the Dutch border, asked people who came into contact with a married couple with the disease to stay at home. Over in the UK, the first case was reported in Wales, following the first case in Northern Ireland last night. The tally for the four-country kingdom was 19 as of Friday morning in the US.

    An update on the hotel in Tenerife where an Italian doctor was diagnosed with the virus and hundreds of guests have been quarantined: The first 9 guests of about 700 who have been isolated since Tuesday have been allowed to leave.

    In Italy, cases soared to 650 on Thursday from 400 a day earlier, bringing the European total to more than 700. France has confirmed another 20 cases, according to the Washington Post, while Charles de Gaulle airport is suspected as a source.

    Offering a picture of political unity to millions of terrified South Koreans, President Moon Jae-in joined with the leaders of rival parties to speak about the necessity for “bold and swift extraordinary measures,” including some deficit-widening fiscal stimulus, to combat the outbreak and revitalize economy, Yonhap News reported, citing a joint statement from South Korea’s parties. Meanwhile, in Japan, the Northern Island of Hokkaido has declared a “State of Emergency” following an outbreak.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Following the confirmation of the 60th case on US soil, the New York Times blasted the White House Task Force on Thursday for reportedly requiring that all statements and public appearances be coordinated through the office of the VP, a move that the NYT fretted might ‘rob’ Americans of sober, scientific advice. We suspect this isn’t really that major of a violation of norms (otherwise, what’s the point of having someone like Pence in charge of coordinating everything), and the NYT is joining its Democratic partners in slinging mud at the Trump Administration.

    As if that weren’t enough, the NYT quickly pivoted to bashing Pence for selecting a trained scientist as the White House’s coronavirus response coordinator, a position that will report to him. The NYT blasted Pence, saying the appointment confused the public about who will be speaking for the administration.

    Last night, President Trump bashed the press coverage of the outbreak in the US during an event celebrating Black History Month at the White House.

    “15 people is almost, I would say, a miracle,” Trump bragged.

    While PM Shinzo Abe tries to quell speculation about the possible cancellation of the Olympics, Japanese Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi and top Chinese diplomat Yang Jiechi said Friday that President Xi Jinping’s scheduled visit to Tokyo would go ahead as planned.

    Heading into the weekend, stock futures in the US are in the red once again as virtually nobody seems to want to be caught holding risk moving into the weekend.

    Dear reader, if you’re wondering why global equities are once again in the red on Friday, CNBC’s Eunice Yoon has got you covered:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    What a relief to see China getting back to work!


    Tyler Durden

    Fri, 02/28/2020 – 22:59

  • American Brides Face A Shortage Of Wedding Dresses Thanks To Coronavirus Outbreak
    American Brides Face A Shortage Of Wedding Dresses Thanks To Coronavirus Outbreak

    As the coronavirus disrupts supply chains from automotive to tech to retail, thousands of American brides might be left without ‘the dress’ of their dreams when the big day arrives.

    As KMBC, a local TV station in Kansas City, reports, even without any confirmed cases of the virus in the Kansas City area, the outbreak in China is going to have an impact on local brides – as well as brides across the country.

    Brides might be facing a shortage of dresses as the summer wedding season approaches, they said.

    With so many factories still shut down across China, and only 30% of small businesses back on line, the television station warns that if your dress isn’t already in the country, you might want to start thinking about a ‘Plan B’.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Salespeople at a local bridal shop told the station that the coronavirus is impacting which dresses they show and sell.

    “In the past, we’d say go ahead and order it, they’ll manufacture it. It’ll be here in time. I can’t do that today. Today I have to say, ‘You know what sweetheart? We need to find you a different dress,” said Lisa Carson, a stylist at Natalie M. bridal shop in Overland Park.

    As of Tuesday, some shipments have been delayed indefinitely, and the shop will no longer order dresses with any exposure to China anywhere along the supply chain.

    It is not just the dresses; it’s everything that it takes to make the dress that is now on hold.

    “It could be the stones. It could be the thread that’s utilized,” Carson said.

    Sometimes, these factors aren’t explicitly known, so the bridal shops are scrambling to trace the provenance of their merchandise and attain a level of familiarity with their products that they have never before needed.

    “What people need to understand is even if the factory where the goods are manufactured is up and running, maybe it’s the factory where the fabric is made or the notions are made, so there’s all those different pieces of the supply chain and they need to all be back on line,” Carson said.

    The issue isn’t limited to bridal dresses: Prom dresses, bridesmaids gowns – anything, really. If you’re planning to order formal wear, and you don’t have a tracking number showing it’s already in the country, you might be screwed.

    Some shops managed to beef up inventory before the shutdown. But only a handful of retailers had the foresight and financing to pull this off.

    For every thousand women who can’t get ‘the dress’, some will inevitably cancel or postpone their weddings, assuming that the supply-chain problem might be a recurring annoyance.

    That would have knock-on effects for venues, country clubs, so much of the service and hospitality industry which is already being hammered by a drop in tourism could see the other shoe – domestic demand – drop.


    Tyler Durden

    Fri, 02/28/2020 – 22:45

  • During The 70s, The CIA Created A "Robot Dragonfly Spy"
    During The 70s, The CIA Created A “Robot Dragonfly Spy”

    Authored by Mac Slavo via SHTFplan.com,

    The United States’ Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is well known for its desire to spy on, track, and contact mass surveillance in order to store information on every single human being possible. And now, thanks to a Freedom of Information Act request, it’s known that they created a robot dragonfly to spy on us.

    Newly-released CIA documents show how the espionage agency developed a robot dragonfly spy. The tiny aerial surveillance device – known as the “insectothopter” – was built in the 1970s according to the CIA Museum, where it has been displayed for 16 years.

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    But blueprints for the robotic insect were released this week by the U.S. spy agency to the website The Black Vault. Those blueprints reveal the finely honed microengineering behind the little spy machine.

    They show how CIA engineers had built miniature listening devices by 1970, but getting them over obstacles such as an embassy wall remained a major obstacle. Many know that the U.S. government, under the Patriot Act, began to spy relentlessly on our every move and store all of the information that they could on us.

    When it was first revealed that the Bush Administration had implemented a secret program of warrantless wiretaps and domestic spying on US citizens, few Americans knew that all of this had happened before. In the early 1970s, it was revealed that US government agencies, including the FBI, CIA, NSA, and IRS, were being used as part of a deliberate plan to infiltrate and disrupt political opponents, and this plan had continued for 20 years under four different Presidents, both Democratic and Republican. This report by the Senate Select Committee (the Church Committee) details the elaborate efforts by the FBI, CIA, and NSA to spy on Americans by tapping their telephones, by intercepting and copying their mail, and even by burglarizing their homes (known as “black bag jobs”). In response to this report, Congress established the FISA courts that Bush bypassed when he directed the NSA to once again spy on Americans without court approval or oversight.

    “The ultimate demonstration of controlled powered flight has not yet been achieved,” the CIA chief scientist, who helped develop the robotic dragonfly wrote.

    In the end, the robot dragonfly – developed 40 years before unmanned drones – never flew and the spy agency closed the project, but they didn’t stop their quest to find new ways to conduct mass surveillance.


    Tyler Durden

    Fri, 02/28/2020 – 22:25

  •  Walmart Developing A Membership Program To Rival Amazon's Prime
     Walmart Developing A Membership Program To Rival Amazon’s Prime

    Amazon is dominating the retail space, putting massive pressure on brick and mortar retail outlets. Now it appears Walmart is going to flank Amazon with a taste of its own medicine by launching a new paid membership program to take on Prime. 

    For the last 18 months, Walmart has been secretly working on a paid membership program called Walmart+, reported Vox

    For just $98 per year, subscribers will get the benefits of unlimited delivery for groceries and all other store items. Walmart had previously rolled out a program called ShippingPass, which shut down three years ago. 

    <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

    Chief Customer Officer Janey Whiteside is overseeing the development and rollout of Walmart+. Additional perks of the service could include discounted drugs and fuel, as well as a new service called Scan & Go that allows subscribers to dodge long cashier lines. 

    Walmart+ is expected to launch a pilot program next month, Vox said. Walmart executives are hoping that future subscribers would lead to more consumption of products and services under the Walmart roof, which would boost profit margins and help stabilize its losing e-commerce business.  

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    The online retail war between Walmart and Amazon is about to heat up. As we’ve previously noted, Walmart has offered free two-day shipping on orders of $35 or more since early 2017, which helped it keep up with Amazon. Amazon still accounts for about half of all e-commerce spending in the US. 

    Walmart teased Amazon last April when it tweeted, “One-day free shipping…without a membership fee. Now THAT would be groundbreaking. Stay tuned.” 

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    In preparation to take on Amazon, Walmart acquired Jet.com in 2016 to expand its e-commerce reach. Now the retail giant believes it has what it takes to challenge Amazon and keep subscribers in a perpetual loop of consumption, enticed by perks and credit cards to overindulge in products.

    Consumption and capitalism, hand in hand: it’s the American way. 


      Tyler Durden

      Fri, 02/28/2020 – 22:05

    • Americans' Vanishing Fear Of Foreign Trade
      Americans’ Vanishing Fear Of Foreign Trade

      Authored by Lydia Saad via Gallup

      Story Highlights

      • Nearly four in five Americans now see trade as mainly an opportunity

      • Fewer than one in five consider trade an economic threat, an all-time low

      • New U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement on trade is favored by both parties

      More Americans than Gallup has seen in a quarter century view foreign trade positively, with 79% calling it “an opportunity for economic growth through increased U.S. exports.”

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Fewer than one in five (18%) — down by about half from 34% in 2016, and the lowest Gallup has recorded — now perceive trade as mainly a “threat to the economy from foreign imports.” A high of 52% of Americans held this skeptical view of trade during the last recession.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      While the percentage of Americans viewing trade as a threat has slipped three percentage points in the past year, the share viewing it positively has risen five points to 79%.

      The latest results are from Gallup’s 2020 World Affairs survey, conducted Feb. 3-16. Gallup has asked this question periodically since 1992, including annually since 2011.

      Americans’ perceptions of whether trade is more of a benefit or a hindrance have closely tracked the U.S. economy, particularly since the 2007-2009 recession. As that recession got underway, Americans were highly likely to view trade as a threat because of imports. But as the economy improved and unemployment declined to historical lows, so too have perceptions of trade as an economic threat.

      Party Groups Largely Agree on Trade

      Trade enjoys strong bipartisan support in the U.S. today, with roughly eight in 10 Democrats (82%) and Republicans (78%), in addition to 76% of independents, seeing it as more of an opportunity for growth than a threat from imports.

      Today’s views by party reflect marked increases in both Democrats’ and Republicans’ positive outlook on trade since their low points in 2008 and 2012, respectively.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      NAFTA’s Replacement Enjoys Broad Support

      The new poll was conducted shortly after President Donald Trump signed the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) — his long-promised replacement for the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) — after bipartisan approval of the bill in both houses of Congress over the prior month. Trump and his North American counterparts signed the initial agreement over a year ago, but its implementation has been held up as congressional Democrats negotiated with the Trump administration over environmental and labor provisions.

      Americans’ views of the USMCA closely mirror their opinions of trade overall. Eight in 10 say the agreement will be good for the U.S., while 13% predict it will be bad.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Reflective of the bipartisan nature of the USMCA’s passage, the newly minted trade agreement receives high support from all party groups, including 88% of Republicans, 78% of independents and 73% of Democrats.

      This reaction is similar to Americans’ initial response to NAFTA after that agreement was proposed during Republican George Bush’s presidency in 1991. At that time, 72% of U.S. adults thought it would be good for the U.S., including 71% of both Republicans and independents, and 73% of Democrats. It was only in later years that NAFTA became more controversial, as well as more closely associated with the Democrats, possibly in part due to Trump’s declaring the agreement a “disaster” during his 2016 campaign.

      Public Not Following USMCA News Story Closely

      Americans’ attention to news about the USMCA has been on the low side for news stories Gallup has measured since 1991. Twelve percent say they have followed it very closely and another 34% somewhat closely, while 28% say not too closely and 26% have not followed it at all. Republicans (56%) are more likely than Democrats (45%) and independents (39%) to have followed it at least somewhat closely.

      The 46% of all Americans following news about the USMCA very or somewhat closely falls short of the 60% average attention score for nearly 230 news items in Gallup’s trend. Support for the agreement is a bit higher among those following it closely (88%) than among those following it not too closely (79%) or not at all (67%).

      Bottom Line

      The large majority of Americans now see trade as mainly an opportunity for economic growth through increased exports rather than a threat from imports. Apart from continued low U.S. unemployment, which raises everyone’s comfort level with trade, Republicans and Democrats likely have differing reasons to feel positively about what trade means for the country. Republicans may feel confident that trade is in better hands under Trump, while Democrats may feel that supporting trade is supporting the effectiveness of the trade deals put in place or championed by Trump’s Democratic predecessors.

      View complete question responses and trends.

      Learn more about how the Gallup Poll Social Series works.


      Tyler Durden

      Fri, 02/28/2020 – 21:45

    • Billionaire Paul Singer Seeks To Kick Out Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey
      Billionaire Paul Singer Seeks To Kick Out Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey

      Some will say it’s long overdue. We would agree.

      According to Bloomberg, billionaire Paul Singer’s activist hedge fund Elliott Management has taken a sizable stake in Twitter and plans to push for changes at the social media company, including replacing Chief Executive Officer Jack Dorsey. As part of its activist campaign, Elliott has nominated four directors to Twitter’s board, and while there are only three seats becoming available at this year’s annual meeting Elliott wanted to ensure that it nominated enough directors to fill all three seats or any other vacancies that may arise.

      Initially, Elliott reportedly approached Twitter about its concerns privately “and has had constructive discussions with it since then”, although the hostile turn of events suggests that discussions were not all that “constructive.”

      Elliott’s push to revamp Twitter comes at a pivotal time – just as Twitter cracks down on alternative voices, silencing and suspending anyone who disagrees with the company’s ultraliberal, virtue signaling ethos without as much as a second thought. As an example of Twitter’s unprecedented anti-conservative bias we can point to the recent tweet of the company’s associate General Counsel Jeff Rich, who in direct breach of his own employer’s Terms of Service, recently urged his followers to “cull” Trump from the herd, in what appears to have been a clear appeal to assassinate a sitting US president.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      We wonder what, if not that, is grounds for Twitter to conclude that someone is violating its rules against abuse and harassment.”

      Not only has twitter taken to silencing voices that its own employees disagree with, while falling prey to foreign powers as demonstrated by the company’s Saudi Arabia infiltration,  which may have culminated with the murder of Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi, but the company has also fallen behind on innovation, choosing to focus on its “core service”, while other social media competitors like Snap and Instagram develop filters and stories popular with their users.

      Besides Elliott, Twitter has been a target for several activist investors over the years as the company has one only class of stock, which means co-founder Dorsey doesn’t have voting control of the company like Facebook Inc.’s Mark Zuckerberg or Snap co-founders Evan Spiegel and Bobby Murphy.

      Dorsey is one of the only people to serve as CEO of two large public companies at the same time — he also runs Square Inc. That makes him a potential target for criticism whenever Twitter stumbles. Bizarrely, the “woke” CEO also said he plans to work up to six months a year in Africa.

      As Bloomberg notes, Elliott isn’t the only investor to voice concerns about Dorsey and Twitter’s governance. Last December, outspoken NYU marketing professor Scott Galloway  penned a letter about his own concerns as an investor in the company.

      “To be clear, my primary objective is the replacement of CEO Jack Dorsey,” Galloway said in an open letter to the company’s executive chairman, Omid Kordestani. “However, your firm’s weapons of mass entrenchment include a staggered board that may force shareholders to seek to replace other directors, including yourself, first.”

      Twitter stock has seesawed in the past year, plunging after its Q3 earnings which fell far short of analyst estimates. At the time, Twitter said its privacy issues involving targeting data would continue to weigh on its advertising business. The company blamed the miss on “bugs” in the way it targeted ads and shared personal information.

      The good news for Twitter shareholders, if not necessarily Jack Dorsey, is that one Elliott gets involved, people get fired. Most recently, the multi-billion fund went activist on Japan’s SoftBank and said it planned to push for a larger share buyback and governance changes at the firm’s Vision Fund, which in recent years has invested billions in virtually every disastrous venture idea it could get its hands on, most notably WeWork.

      Needless to say, once Jack is gone not a single tear will be shed on this website.


      Tyler Durden

      Fri, 02/28/2020 – 21:26

    • Mapping The Oldest Companies In Existence
      Mapping The Oldest Companies In Existence

      In just a few decades, it’s possible that some of today’s most recognized companies may no longer be household names.

      As Visual Capitalist’s Iman Ghosh notes, corporate longevity, or the average lifespan of a company, has been shrinking dramatically.

      In the 1960s, a typical S&P 500 company was projected to last for more than 60 years. However, with the rapidly transforming business landscape today, it’s down to just 18 years.

      The Companies With the Strongest Staying Power

      Even with companies skewing younger, there are always exceptions to the rule.

      Luckily, many companies around the world have stood the test of time, and today’s detailed map from Business Financing highlights the oldest company in existence in each country.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      For centuries, here are the world’s oldest corporations which have made their mark:

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Whether they were born out of necessity to support a rapidly growing population—requiring new infrastructure and more money circulation—or simply to satisfy peoples’ thirst for alcohol or hunger for fried chicken, these companies continue to play a lasting role.

      The Oldest Company in Every Country, by Region

      Let’s dive into the regional maps, which paint a different picture for each continent.

      In the following maps, countries are color-coded based on the major industry that the oldest company falls under:

      • Primary: Natural resources

      • Secondary: Manufacturing and processing

      • Tertiary: Services and distribution

      • Quaternary: Knowledge and information

      Notes on Methodology:

      This research considers both state-run and independent businesses in their definitions. For countries where data was hard to pin down, they have been grayed out.

      As well, since many countries have a relatively new inception, present-day names and borders have been used. The map does not factor in older companies that are no longer in operation, or if it was unclear whether they were still open.

      Click here to explore the full research methodology.

      North America

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Mexico’s La Casa de Moneda de México (founded 1534) is the oldest company across North America, and the first mint of America. Owned by the Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés, it was where the famous ‘pieces of eight’, or Spanish dollars were created.

      In the U.S., the Shirley Plantation in Virginia is an ongoing reminder of the history of slavery. First founded in 1613, business actually began in 1638—and as many as 90 slaves were under indentured labor on the estate growing tobacco.

      Further north, Canada’s Hudson’s Bay (founded 1670) was at the helm of the fur trade between European settlers and First Nations tribes—the two parties agreed on beaver pelts as a common, valuable trade standard.

      South America

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Three of the five oldest companies in South America are mints—specifically in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru.

      The oldest of these mints, Casa Nacional de Moneda in Peru, was built on order from Spain and established in 1565. After the great influx of newly-mined silver from America to Europe, the Spanish crown outlined to King Felipe II that building a mint would give the colony economic benefits and more control.

      Europe

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      In total, 15 of Europe’s oldest companies are related to the food and beverage industries, from distilleries, vintners (winemaking), and breweries alongside restaurants and pubs. Austria’s St. Peter Stifts Kulinarium (founded in 803) is Europe’s oldest restaurant, located inside the St. Peter’s Abbey monastery.

      Although Germany is famously known for its beer culture, its oldest company is in fact the Staffelter Hof Winery (founded in 862). Today, Germany is still a top wine country, with the industry generating up to $17 billion in revenue per year.

      Asia

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Asia has six oldest companies in the banking and finance category, as well as another six in the aviation and transport sector. The continent is also home to two of the world’s oldest companies, located in Japan and China.

      The Japanese temple and shrine construction company, Kongō Gumi Co., Ltd. (founded in 578) has weathered a few storms over the millennia, from nuclear bombs to financial crises. In 2006, it was bought by the construction conglomerate, Takamatsu Construction Group Co., and continues to operate today.

      In neighboring China, Ma Yu Ching’s Bucket Chicken House has endured dynasties of change as well. The company’s simple premise has come a long way, and it was named a cultural heritage in the country’s Henan Province.

      Africa

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Africa’s oldest companies are another vestige of the colonial legacy, with 11 transport companies—airlines, ports and shipping, and railways—and 9 postal services.

      In fact, Cape Verde’s Correios de Cabo Verde (postal service, founded in 1849) and the DRC’s Société nationale des Chemins de fer du Congo (national railway company, founded in 1889) still go by their Portuguese and French names respectively.

      Banking is another one of the oldest industries, with 17 companies across Africa. Zimbabwe’s Standard Chartered branch has been around since 1892, a subsidiary of its London-based parent company.

      Oceania

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Australia officially became a country on January 1st, 1901—but its oldest company, the Australia Post (founded in 1809) precedes this by almost a century.

      Interestingly, just one more old company could be located for this region, which is the Bank of New Zealand—one of the country’s Big Four banks.

      All in all, these oldest companies paint a historical picture of the major industries which have shaped entire regions.

      Did you recognize any on the list?


      Tyler Durden

      Fri, 02/28/2020 – 21:25

    • The Greatest Gold Quotes Of All Time
      The Greatest Gold Quotes Of All Time

      Via SchiffGold.com,

      People have treasured gold for millennia. They’ve draped it over the bodies. They’ve used it as money. They’ve even adorned their tombs with the yellow metal. As beloved as it is, it should come as no surprise that gold has been the subject of many famous quotes.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      So, what are the greatest quotes featuring gold of all time? We wanted to find out so we held a contest. The prize – once ounce of pure gold.

      Roy Sebag ran the contest through his Twitter account. Roy is the founder of GoldMoney, and SchiffGold is part of the GoldMoney family.

      The contest was pretty simple. Respond to Roy’s tweet with a name and original quote by a historic figure in relation to gold.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      The response was fantastic. Over 500 people responded with quotes. Roy picked the top four and drew the winner out of a hat.

      And the winner was…

      “Love is the soul’s electric flame,
      And gold its best conductor.” -Robert Burns

      The quote comes from a poem.

      She asked why wedding rings are made of gold;
      I ventured this to instruct her;
      Why, madam, love and lightning are the same,
      On earth they glance, from Heaven they came.
      Love is the soul’s electric flame,
      And gold its best conductor.

      The other finalists were as follows.

      “Gold loves to make its way through guards, and breaks through barriers of stone more easily than the lightning’s bolt.” – Horace

      “Truth, like gold, is to be obtained not by its growth, but by washing away from it all that is not gold.” – Leo Tolstoy

      “Only as an image of the highest virtue did gold get to be the highest value. The giver’s glance gleams like gold. A golden brilliance concludes the peace between the moon and the sun. Uncommon is the highest virtue and useless, it is gleaming and gentle in its brilliance.” – Nietzsche

      “The return on gold does not depend on the fulfillment of some material condition. It is an ideological problem. It presupposes only one thing: the abandonment of the illusion that increasing the quantity of money creates prosperity.” Ludwig von Mises

      And here are some more of the greatest gold quotes.

      “Let us rejoice that we are poor, And have no gold to keep: We do not need to bar the door Ere we can go to sleep.” -Robert Leighton

      “Gold is money. Everything else is credit.” – J.P. Morgan

      “Brass shines as fair to the ignorant as gold to the goldsmiths.” – Queen Elizabeth I

      “Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants – but debt is the money of slaves.” – Norm Franz

      “Gold — what can it not do, and undo?” — William Shakespeare

      “We are often told that the Gold Standard will shackle us to the United States. I will deal with that in a moment. I will tell you what it will shackle us to. It will shackle us to reality. For good or for ill, it will shackle us to reality. – Winston Churchill

      “The desire of gold is not for gold. It is for the means of freedom and benefit.” ― Ralph Waldo Emerson

      “O Gold! I still prefer thee unto paper which makes bank credit like a bark of vapour.” – Lord Byron

      “Because gold is honest money it is disliked by dishonest men.” – Ron Paul

      “O Zeus, why is it you have given men clear ways of testing whether gold is counterfeit but, when it comes to men, the body carries no stamp of nature for distinguishing bad from good?” ― Euripides

      “Everything has its limit- iron ore cannot be educated into gold.” – Mark twain

      “Gold makes the ugly beautiful.” – Moliere

      “[Gold] can be made either into bars, ingots, or coins…has no nationality [and] is considered, in all places and at all times, the immutable and fiduciary value par excellence.” – Charles de Gaulle

      “When Gold argues the cause, eloquence is impotent.” — Publilius Syrus

      “An inch of time is an inch of gold, but an inch of time cannot be purchased for an inch of gold. Pure gold does not fear furnace. Read critically, and you will find each word worth a thousand ounces of gold. Words are mere bubbles of water, but deeds are drops of gold.” – 中国谚语

      “Gold was a gift to Jesus. If it’s good enough for Jesus, it’s good enough for me!” — Mr. T

      “Gold was not selected arbitrarily by governments to be the monetary standard. Gold had developed for many centuries on the free market as the best money; as the commodity providing the most stable and desirable monetary medium.” -Murray Rothbard

      “Now a river went out of Eden to water the garden, and from there it parted and became four riverheads. The name of the first is Pishon … where there is gold. And the gold of that land is good.” Moses, Genesis 2:10-12

      “Gold is tried by fire, brave men by adversity.” -Seneca

      “Stay gold Ponyboy.” – Johnny Cade in The Outsiders

      “From a strictly economic point of view, buying gold in a major inflation and holding it probably presents the least risk of capital loss of any investment or speculation.” – Henry Hazlitt

      “Dare to love yourself as if you were a rainbow with gold at both ends.” Author-Poet Aberjhani


      Tyler Durden

      Fri, 02/28/2020 – 21:05

    • US Spy Agencies Monitor Covid-19 Spread, Warn Of Threat To India's 1BN+ Population
      US Spy Agencies Monitor Covid-19 Spread, Warn Of Threat To India’s 1BN+ Population

      This could actually be a rare example of taxpayer money being put to good use by US intelligence agencies for a change, instead of the usual overthrowing governments, funding fanatical “rebels”, and eavesdropping on domestic communications.

      Reuters reports that US spy agencies are closely monitoring the coronavirus and as a global threat to the homeland, and foreign governments’ ability to respond:

      U.S. intelligence agencies are monitoring the global spread of coronavirus and the ability of governments to respond, sources familiar with the matter said on Thursday, warning that there were concerns about how India would cope with a widespread outbreak.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      CIA headquarters in Langley, VA. Image source: Library of Congress

      Both India and Iran are said to be of top concern for intelligence officials, given especially India’s densely packed population of over 1 billion people.

      The New York Post writes

      Spy agencies in the US are monitoring the spread of coronavirus across the world — with a focus on India — as officials grapple with concerns over the country’s ability to handle a widespread outbreak.

      India has confirmed just three cases of COVID-19 in the country, while its government says 23,531 people are under observationthe Economic Times reported.

      As for Iran, it’s widely believed the Islamic Republic’s leaders are concealing the true numbers in the hardest hit Middle East country, while lashing out at Washington for stoking fear and “propaganda” – as President Hassan Rouhani put it in a Wednesday speech.

      A new report in The Daily Beast  cites health researches who say Iran’s true numbers of infected could be closer to 18,000 and not the current official figure of over 240.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      India’s Economic Times: “Places like Mumbai’s Dharavi slum can facilitate contact with virus-bearing droplets emitted by breathing, talking, coughing or sneezing.”

      Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said earlier this week that US remains “deeply concerned” Tehran is covering up the true level of its outbreak.

      Meanwhile, the Reuters report notes further that the House Intelligence Committee is being regularly briefed by US intelligence

      “The Committee has received a briefing from the IC (intelligence community) on coronavirus, and continues to receive updates on the outbreak on a daily basis,” a House Intelligence Committee official told Reuters.

      “Addressing the threat has both national security and economic dimensions, requiring a concerted government-wide effort and the IC is playing an important role in monitoring the spread of the outbreak, and the worldwide response,” the official said.


      Tyler Durden

      Fri, 02/28/2020 – 20:45

    • Domestic Terror? Canadian Environmentalist Protesters Attempt To Derail Train
      Domestic Terror? Canadian Environmentalist Protesters Attempt To Derail Train

      Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

      Shocking video out of Ontario, Canada shows left-wing environmentalist protesters attempt to derail and then set fire to a train.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Members of the Mohawk First Nation, who are engaging in rail blockades in an effort to stop the construction of a pipeline, were filmed standing in front of a train before pelting it with rocks and then laying thick tree branches on the tracks.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      The footage then shows the protesters burning wooden pallets in an attempt to set fire to the train.

      Another video shows firefighters attending to a car that was engulfed in flames and placed on the railway tracks.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Some reacted to the clips by calling for the group to be listed as a domestic terror organization.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      “It is extremely concerning to see people endangering their own lives and the lives of others by trying to interfere with the trains,” remarked Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

      According to Quebec Premier Francois Legault, some of the demonstrators have also been seen carrying AK-47s.

      While some of the protesters have been arrested while manning the blockades, no charges have been brought.

      *  *  *

      My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me. Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here. Support my sponsor – Emergency Survival Foods – delicious dishes & a 25 year shelf life!


      Tyler Durden

      Fri, 02/28/2020 – 20:25

    • China Reports Catastrophic Data: PMIs Crash To Record Low, Confirming Coronavirus Collapse
      China Reports Catastrophic Data: PMIs Crash To Record Low, Confirming Coronavirus Collapse

      One week ago, ahead of today’s Chinese data release which would for the first time capture the devastation from the coronavirus pandemic, we wrote that “to those who have been following our series of high-frequency, daily indicators of China’s economy, it will probably not come as a surprise that the world’s second biggest economy has ground to a halt, its GDP set to post the first negative print in modern history. To everyone else who is just now catching up, we have some news: it’s going to be bad.”

      Specifically, we said that ahead of official Chinese economic data which will soon start capturing the period when the coronavirus crippled the country’s economy, Nomura’s Chief China economist Ting Lu pointed out that China’s Emerging Industries PMI (EPMI), which gauges momentum in the country’s high-tech industries and is closely correlated with official manufacturing PMI, slumped to 29.9 in February (from 50.1 in January!), its lowest-print on record, which was a “pure reflection of the devastating impact of the COVID-19 outbreak.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      What would this mean for the closely followed China manufacturing PMI? As Nomura added, “even adjusting for seasonality and expected progress in business resumption in the coming week, we estimate the official manufacturing PMI could drop to a range of 30-40 in Feb.”

      In retrospect, it turns out that Nomura’s dire forecast was optimistic, because moments ago China’s National Statistics Bureau reported the latest, February PMIs and they were absolutely catastrophic:

      • Manufacturing PMI crashed to 35.7 in Feb, far below the 45.0 consensus estimate, and sharply down from 50.0 in January. A record low.
      • Non-Manufacturing PMI plummets to 28.9, also far below the 50.5 consensus, estimate, and down nearly 50% from the 54.1 in Jan. This too was a record low.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Putting these numbers in context, they are far, far worse than the prints for both series reported during the financial crisis, when the mfg PMI dropped to “only” 38.8, while the non-manufacturing PMI never even contracted.

      What is even more ominous is that while China’s non-mfg PMI has traditionally been stronger, in February not only did it collapse into deep contraction, but it plunged to 5 points below where the manufacturing sector currently finds itself, a catastrophic 20-handle. This means that China’s service industries, long seen as the guiding light to China’s successful transition away from a manufacturing-led economy, is now devastated.

      Commenting on the unprecedented number, Bloomberg’s China economist Tom Orlik said that “the first credible gauge of how China’s economy is fairing under virus lock down – the official PMI – is pointing to a brutal drop into contraction.” Well, no: anyone who read our recent series analyzing “high-frequency”, real-time Chinese data already was already aware of the catastrophic collapse in China’s economy.

      Of course, we are confident that as so often happens, the market will take these numbers in stride, as they will be an indication that China is “kitchen sinking” the collapse, and a V-shaped recovery will follow. Alas, it won’t because while not only has China’s economy not picked up even modestly, but it is only a matter of time before Beijing, which has forced people to go to work against their will, succumbs to a second wave of coronavirus infections, one which will result in a far worse economic collapse than the current one, which incidentally has yet to show any actual recovery!

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Finally, for all those expecting that Beijing will unleash another massive stimulus to kick-start the economy at any cost, we give the last word to Nomura’s Ting Lu, who not only correctly predicted the plunge in PMIs, but also says that “the likelihood of another round of massive stimulus appears low as policy space remains limited.””

      “We believe markets might underestimate the scale of the current growth slump. Due to a slower-than-expected rate of business resumption, we have cut our year-on-year Q1 real GDP growth forecast to 3.0% and expect Beijing to ramp up policy easing measures in coming months. That said, the likelihood of another round of massive stimulus appears low as policy space remains limited.

      In short, for China – which was the world’s growth dynamo during the global financial crisis and helped the world rebound from the 2009 global depression while raking up tens of trillions in debt – the end of the economic road may finally be here.


      Tyler Durden

      Fri, 02/28/2020 – 20:23

    • "Trump Faces An Impossible Trade-Off": Why A Global Recession Is Now Inevitable
      “Trump Faces An Impossible Trade-Off”: Why A Global Recession Is Now Inevitable

      With California reporting late on Friday that a second coronavirus case of “unknown origin” has been uncovered, prompting Santa Claria’s Health Department to caution that “now is the time to prepare for the possibility of widespread community transmission” echoing similar warnings from the CDC, the Trump administration’s response to what now appears an inevitable surge in US-based coronavirus cases is becoming an increasingly politicized topic, and not without justification: after all, it is hardly a secret that Trump’s favorite “job approval” barometer has been the stock market – which hit an all time high as recently as last week – and it is also hardly a secret that Trump hardly wishes to inspire a stock market panic by disclosing the full extent and severity of any potential domestic epidemic (which ironically, aligns Trump ideologically with China, which is now willing to sacrifice its population in the pursuit of restarting the Chinese economy).

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Yet the more Trump, or various domestic institutions, appears evasive over the full extent of the corona crisis inside the US, the more markets get hit. Worse, the longer Trump avoids addressing the potential domestic epidemic, the more likely it is that the market crash that saw stocks plunge this week at the fastest rate since the financial crisis, will persist.

      This brings us to an absolutely spot-on observation made by Bank of America’s rates strategist Ralf Preusser, who explains why for Trump, and US stocks, it may only get worse, before it gets even worse. That reason is that markets now seem to be taking the view that authorities – i.e., Trump – face an impossible trade-off:

      • On one hand, they can adopt the Draconian quarantine measures seen in China and trigger a global recession as worldwide economic activity grinds to a halt
      • Or, they can risk a pandemic by failing to take more aggressive action on Covid-19, also resulting in a global recession

      China initially tried the first only to watch its economy grind to a halt, and then flipped in pursuit of the second option (while covering up the full extent of the ongoing coronavirus crisis within its borders) in hopes of rebooting the economy (the results of this diabolical approach are dismal at best as the following charts show), at least until the wave of new infections overruns the system and forces Beijing to once again “come clean”, while blaming it on a definition “glitch.”

      Similar to China, the Trump administration realizes the “Catch-22” nature of the dilemma it is facing and is hoping to delay making a decision for as long as possible, knowing well that either choice could trip the US into a recession and with the November elections looming, a recessionary outcome could devastate Trump’s odds for reelection.

      Of course, there will come a moment when even Trump will have to pick an approach, and if it is the first, the US economy would grind to a halt on short notice, similar to China, while the second will not only spark risks of an even greater epidemic over in the long run but trigger an aggressive popular response against Trump (one spearheaded by the resistance media), and which will paint the US President as the American version of Xi Jinping – one willing to sacrifice US citizens just to keep stock prices elevated.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      While we wait to see which option in this Faustian bargain Trump picks, BofA writes that while it is hopeful that we are ” faced with a situation where the epidemic remains under control with clusters of outbreaks that are contained” even there it “cannot rule out recession risks given possible supply chain disruptions and the extent to which the global recovery is dependent on the consumer.”

      Moreover, Preusser adds, “we need to acknowledge that even after recent corrections in risk assets (equities, credit, EM, periphery), allocations to risk remain meaningful and markets are short of hedges.” From that perspective, Bank of America warns that the “30-50% recession risks implied by the market do not seem extravagant to us.”

      So is a recession looming, and when will we know? According to Preusser, “the question is to what extent next week’s data will incorporate this week’s deterioration in Covid-19.” One place that should give a sense of the supply disruptions is China PMIs, although this data has been notoriously massaged in the past. Separately, the US ISM print may show the sentiment effect of the China element of the outbreak, but would fail to reflect this week’s realization that the virus may be spreading meaningfully beyond Asia. Likewise the labor market report will be backward looking at this stage. Finally, German January factory orders and the details of the European PMI prints will not tell us much about the risks to the European recovery from the outbreak in Italy.

      In short, the lack of any clear confirmation that the global economy is stalling may give Trump just the ammo to keep his head stuck in the sand, pretending there is no trouble and that only Powell is to blame for the market’s woes. The irony, of course, is that the longer Trump delays picking an approach, leading to what Bank of America calls a state of “Schrodinger’s Recession”…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      … the more likely it is that a very real recession will be the inevitable outcome, and this week the stock market, whose discounting abilities have been crushed by the Fed’s central planning in the past decade but still function if just barely, finally realized that.


      Tyler Durden

      Fri, 02/28/2020 – 20:05

    • Why Are Polar Bears Going Extinct? (Spoiler Alert: They're Not!)
      Why Are Polar Bears Going Extinct? (Spoiler Alert: They’re Not!)

      Via Dr. Susan Crockford’s PolarBearScience.com,

      Google says many people ask this question so here is the correct answer: polar bears are not going extinct.

      If you have been told that, you have misunderstood or have been misinformed. Polar bears are well-distributed across their available habitat and population numbers are high (officially 22,000-31,000 at 2015 but likely closer to 26,000-58,000 at 2018): these are features of a healthy, thriving species.

      Why are polar bears going extinct?’ contains a false premise – there is no need to ask ‘why’ when the ‘polar bears [are] going extinct’ part is not true.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      It is true that in 2007, it was predicted that polar bear numbers would plummet when summer sea ice declined to 42% of 1979 levels for 8 out of 10 years (anticipated to occur by 2050) and extinct or nearly so by 2100 (Amstrup et al. 2007). However, summer sea ice has been at ‘mid-century-like’ levels since 2007 (with year to year variation, see NOAA ice chart below) yet polar bear numbers have increased since 2005. The anticipated disaster did not occur but many people still believe it did because the media and some researchers still give that impression.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The prediction of imminent extinction of the polar bear was an utter failure, as I’ve shown in this scientific paper (Crockford 2017) and my most recent book, The Polar Bear Catastrophe That Never Happened.

      Examine the evidence and you will see that claims of polar bears going extinct are simply not true. So far, the response of polar bears to recent ice loss suggests that they will continue to thrive with even less summer ice than there has been in recent years as long as ice in winter (December-March) and spring (April-June) remains reasonably abundant, as has been the case to date. The most recent information available is summarized in the upcoming State of the Polar Bear Report 2019, to be released 27 February 2020 but see also the 2018 report (Crockford 2019b).

      The graph below was constructed by NASA sea ice expert Walt Meier and published by the US National Snow and Ice Data Center in early October 2019. It shows clearly that summer sea ice (measured as the average for September) has not declined further since 2007 but has had a flat trend.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The graph below is from my book and shows the growth of global polar bear numbers since the 1960s.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The final estimate 26,000-58,000 or 39,000 average) is my plausible and scientifically defensible ‘best guess’ based on extrapolation of recent survey results, summarized here and explained in detail in my book.

      FOOTNOTE

      One of Google’s top ‘suggestion’ when I search for the term ‘polar bear’ is a list of questions that people supposedly ask the most (‘People also ask’), including ‘Why are polar bears going extinct?’

      The ‘answer’ provided is not an actual answer but a statement from WWF, an multi-national organization financially invested in promoting the idea that polar bears are suffering due to declining sea ice: it’s paid Google advertising meant to look like answers and facts:

      ‘Because of ongoing and potential loss of their sea ice habitat resulting from climate change, polar bears were listed as a threatened species in the US under the Endangered Species Act in May 2008. The survival and the protection of the polar bear habitat are urgent issues for WWF.’

      Note the statement misleadingly says ‘sea ice’ when it really means ‘summer sea ice’ – the predictions of potential polar bear population decline were based exclusively on summer ice (Amstrup et al. 2007; Crockford 2017, 2019).

      As I said above, ‘Why are polar bears going extinct?’ contains a false premise – there is no need to ask ‘why’, when the ‘polar bears [are] going extinct’ part is not true. This post is for the people who search the internet thinking that polar bears really are going extinct.

      Another question Google offers is: ‘How many polar bears are left?’ Answer [my bold]:

      ‘In fact, the World Wide Fund for Nature (or WWF) estimates that there are only 22,000 to 31,000 polar bears left in the world. Jan 25, 2019’

      Only? This global estimate, provided by the IUCN Red List (not the WWF) means there are almost three times more polar bears than the 10,000 or so there were in 1960 (Regehr et al. 2016; Wiig et al. 2015). But the Red List figure includes out-of-date estimates and low-balled guesses for many of the 19 subpopulations and my book (Crockford 2019) explains why this 2015 estimate sanctioned by the IUCN was almost certainly too low.


      Tyler Durden

      Fri, 02/28/2020 – 19:45

    • Greece Sends 50 Naval Vessels & Commandos To Block Refugee Wave Out Of Turkey
      Greece Sends 50 Naval Vessels & Commandos To Block Refugee Wave Out Of Turkey

      Greece sealed its key land Kastanies border crossing with Turkey Friday after Ankara declared it’s allowing refugees to flee Idlib and on to Europe for at least 72 hours, in response to Syrian-Russian airstrikes killing 33 Turkish troops Thursday.

      Germany’s Bild newspaper reported Friday that Greece is taking further emergency measures to prevent Erdogan from effectively “opening the gates” on new waves of refugee and migrant hordes seeking entry to the EU, noting the country “completely closed off its borders with Turkey: not just for refugees, but for EVERYONE.”

      The newspaper said 50 naval ships, likely most of them small patrol vessels, have been deployed by the Hellenic Navy to ensure those coming out of Turkey don’t get through.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Hellenic Navy file image

      Citing a top Greek government official, Bild reported further this will include air support.

      “According to BILD information, the government sent 50 warships to the Greek islands to protect the EU’s external borders,” the German tabloid said. “Ten helicopters are also supposed to secure the transitions to Turkey on land.”

      Greece’s Ekathimerini newspaper said military commandos were being sent to key crossings following an emergency meeting of key government officials Friday to deal with the crisis:

      Patrols along the land and river border in northeastern Evros have been bolstered since Friday morning, when the first large groups of migrants began to arrive following an announcement on Thursday night by a Turkish government official saying that Ankara would no longer try to prevent Syrians fleeing war in their country from attempting the crossing to the European Union.

      The army has also dispatched two commando units to help the Hellenic Police guards at the border, and particularly to patrol the more dangerous sections of the Evros River.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      And The Guardian reported further early Friday: “Hundreds of Syrian refugees in Turkey have begun preparing to travel towards the country’s borders with Greece and Bulgaria after Ankara’s sudden decision to no longer impede their passage to Europe.” 

      “Turkish police, coastguard and border security officials were ordered to stand down overnight on Thursday, Turkish officials briefed reporters,” the report added.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Bild: Greece uses tear gas against refugees at the Pazarkule border crossing Photo. Image: Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

      As European officials mull whether this is but more of Erdogan’s threats or perhaps an early “taste” of what’s to come, or whether the flood has begun, Bulgaria has begun taking extra security action as well, bolstering patrols along border areas with Turkey

      Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis vowed that “no illegal entries into Greece will be tolerated” – noting greatly tightened security along the EU’s external borders.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Turkey’s communications director Fahrettin Altun had earlier said Turkey had “no choice” but to relax border controls after its pleas for greater European help in assisting with the over 3 million refugees on its territory went unheeded. 

      However, Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu sought to downplay new reports of Turkey encouraging refugees exit toward Europe, saying Turkey’s policy hasn’t changed. But footage coming out of Turkey and the Greece-Turkey main crossing throughout Friday speaks otherwise.


      Tyler Durden

      Fri, 02/28/2020 – 19:25

    • Corona-Crash Sparks Fastest 'Correction' In History On Record-Breaking Volume
      Corona-Crash Sparks Fastest ‘Correction’ In History On Record-Breaking Volume

      It was a historic week…

      S&P crashed from peak to correction at the fastest pace in history…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Dow crashed from peak to correction at its fastest pace since 1928 – right before The Great Depression

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Right on time…we’re gonna need more liquidity…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Some more historical context…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The last 7 days has been carnage…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      As SunTrust’s chief market strategist  Keith Lerner wrote:

      “Investors are selling stocks first and asking questions later.”

      “We are seeing signs of pure liquidation. ‘Get me out at any cost’ seems to be the prevailing mood. There is little doubt the coronavirus will continue to weigh on the global economy, and the U.S. will not be immune. There is much we do not know. However, it is also premature to suggest the base case for the U.S. economy is recession.”

      But, James McCormick, global head of desk strategy at NatWest Markets noted:

      Asset prices diverged significantly from growth in the past year, in part because of central bank policy, but also because passive investment’s main signal is price action.

      The COVID-19 escalation runs a real risk of virtuous cycle turning to a vicious one. Either way, given where growth estimates are heading for the next few months, I’d expect more downside.”

      Some of the week/month/year’s high- and low-lights…

      • S&P is down 7 days in a row – longest losing streak since Nov 2016 (worst month since Feb 2009 – equal to Dec 2018’s drop, worst week since Lehman – Oct 2008)

      • Dow is down 7 days in a row – longest losing streak since June 2018 (worst month since Feb 2009, worst week since Lehman – Oct 2008)

      • Dow volume today hit an all-time record high.

      • MAGA stocks lost $780 Billion in market cap in the last 7 days.

      • World stocks lost $5 trillion in market cap in the last 7 days

      • VIX exploded 30 points higher in Feb – its biggest monthly spike in vols ever

      • Bank stocks suffered their biggest weekly drop since March 2009 (worst month since Feb 2009)

      • Airline stocks suffered their biggest weekly drop since March 2009 (worst month since Nov 2008)

      • 2Y yields fell 39bps in Feb – the biggest yield drop since Nov 2008

      • 30Y yields fell 33bps in Feb – the biggest yield drop since Aug 2019

      • Treasury Vol highest since Sept 2013

      • HY Credit Spreads widened by the most since the financial crisis in Feb

      • The USDollar rose by the most since July 2019 in Feb (but the worst week since 2019)

      • Silver suffered its worst monthly drop since May 2016

      • Gold’s worst day today since June 2013

      • Oil collapsed again in February for its worst start to a year since 1991

      At its low today, the Dow wiped out almost all of last year’s 22% gain…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Stocks rebounded a little today on hopes of an emergency cut this weekend… but that failed… and then sheer panic-buying (PPT?) which pushed Nasdaq just into the green!!!

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Just look at the closing ramp – End of month flows? Algos gone wild…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Notably Nasdaq bounced off its 200DMA…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Looks like month-end rebalancing, and bonds reversed after the cash close…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Fed speakers and Jay Powell issued statements which definitely didn’t suggest that a Sunday night rescue was planned (despite Kevin Warsh’s urging)…

      0830ET Kaplan: “I’ll be prepared to make a judgement as we go into the March meeting, I am trying to keep my attention on what’s going on in the underlying economy.”

      0905ET Bullard: “Further policy rate cuts are a possibility if a global pandemic actually develops with health effects approaching the scale of ordinary influenza, but this is not the baseline case at this time… Longer-term U.S. interest rates have been driven lower by a global flight to safety, likely benefiting the U.S. economy.” Bullard added that “even with the current stock market price drop, equities have been on a long upswing.”

      1030ET Bullard spoke again reaffirming that US GDP Forecasts “don’t look very severe” and The Fed is “willing to react if virus has major impact but will want to wait and monitor events until the next meeting.”

      1430ET Powell: “The fundamentals of the U.S. economy remain strong. However, the coronavirus poses evolving risks to economic activity. The Federal Reserve is closely monitoring developments and their implications for the economic outlook. We will use our tools and act as appropriate to support the economy.”

      Powell’s pumping plan failed…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      CNBC’s Steve Liesman also summed things up well:

      “At what level of interest rates would I be willing to go to a rock concert and risk infection?”

      Nevertheless, the market is now demanding 36bps of cuts in March (so one cut guaranteed and a 50% or so chance of 50bps), additionally market is pricing in 65bps of cuts by June.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      China, finally, was ugly overnight, starting to catch down to EU and US stocks since Covid-19 struck…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Despite today’s desperate attempt to rebound – perhaps on hopes of an emergency rate-cut by The Fed this weekend and Powell’s statement – the S&P and Dow are down 7 days in a row…with 4 intraday 1,000 point drops in a row

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      The S&P 500 just suffered its fastest crash from peak to correction ever… and US stocks saw their worst week since Lehman (Oct 2008), leaving everything red year-to-date…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Stock market volume has exploded higher as the crash has accelerated – notably higher volumes than during the Dec 2018 crash…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The Dow saw its biggest volume since April 2006…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      FANG stocks were FUBAR…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      MAGA stocks have lost $780 billion in the last week…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      World Stocks lost over $5.1 trillion in market cap in the last 6 days – that is the biggest loss ever…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Airline stocks collapsed over 21% this week – their worst since March 2009…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Bank stocks were a bloodbath this week…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      The biggest 6-day collapse in bank stocks since the peak of the financial crisis…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      VIX surged over 30 points in Feb…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      VIX closed at its highest since Aug 2011…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Liquidity has collapsed in the VIX complex as bid-offer spreads have exploded…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Credit markets imploded in the last week, with HY Bond OAS blowing out in Feb by the most

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Treasury yields plunged in February, with the long-end crashing 33bps – the biggest drop since Aug 2019…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      But while all yields were lower, the 2Y saw the biggest drop – down 39bps – the biggest monthly decline since Nov 2008

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      As an aside, the Austria 100-year bond price is back to record highs…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      While equity vol is exploding, Bond vol is also spiking dramatically, to its highest since Sept 2013

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      10Y Real Treasury Rates crashed down to -75bps…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      The yield curve (3m10Y) flattened for the second month in a row, closing inverted…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      The entire Treasury curve is now trading below the Fed Funds rate…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      The dollar fell 0.25% on the week, thanks to a last-minute statement from The Fed’s Jay Powell. This was the worst week for the dollar since 2019…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Cryptos had an ugly week (BTC -11%, ETH -15%) erasing the month’s gains leaving only Ethereum positive in Feb…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Thanks to today’s carnage in gold, the yellow metal actually ended the month in the red

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      The week was also a bloodbath for all commodities… led by oil…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Silver was clubbed like a baby seal this week to the lowest since Aug 2019…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Gold was also monkey-hammered today on massive volume… its worst day since June 2013

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Oil extended its losses from January for the worst start to a year since 1991…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Lots of questions about the crash in gold today – we point to one key chart for the culprit – BoJ!!

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Finally, as @QTRResearch noted:

      MON – People on CNBC said buying – WRONG
      TUE – People on CNBC said buying – WRONG
      WED – People on CNBC said buying – WRONG
      THU – People on CNBC said buying – WRONG
      FRI – People on CNBC said buying – WRONG

      And as Jim Bianco noted, CNBC hit the panic button this week…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Or did the market panic over Bernie?

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      From “Extreme Greed” to “Extreme Fear” in 2 months…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: CNN

      Still, we know who will be buying this dip… or telling you to…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      White House Economic Adivser Larry Kudlow suggested investors “buy the dip.”


      Tyler Durden

      Fri, 02/28/2020 – 19:11

    • Democrats Have No Choice Left But To 'Feel The Bern'
      Democrats Have No Choice Left But To ‘Feel The Bern’

      Authored by Tim Kriby via The Strategic Culture Foundation,

      Now that Bernie Sanders has been informed that the Kremlin is trying to support him (whether he likes it or not) he has officially become a viable candidate who may actually desire to make real systemic change. In a way the Russia connection accusation can now be worn as a badge of honour by Gabbard and Trump due to them truly being a limited threat to the status quo. Sanders got a gentler version of this form of Deep State virtue signaling by just being told that Russians are pushing for him on their own, meaning that there “may be hope for him yet” to turn around and jump right back on the Beltway bandwagon. Ultimately, the #Russiagate tactic did not disway voters from electing Trump but it did eat up a massive amount of his precious time/resources as US President and put an invisible Iron Curtain between any possible positive cooperation between America and Russia. This “collusion” revelation of dubious validity for Sanders will probably have a similar impact on his campaign and possible time in the Oval Office as it did with Trump, but regardless he is the only chance the Democrats have of winning in 2020.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Democratic and Republican voters are obviously different in their beliefs falling onto one of two different sides of every wedge issue, but one thing unites all American voters – no one actually cares about Russia or really any foreign power. Over the last 6 months, less than 0.5% of Americans said their primary concern was “Situation with Russia” based on polling by Gallup. (Gallop lists all concerns with a tiny response at 0.5% meaning that literally one person could have listed this as their big issue and it would be rounded up to half a percent). If we then take a look at the biggest concerns that Americans do have, then not surprisingly it is things like the economy, healthcare, government/poor leadership, immigration, poverty and surprisingly unifying the country.

      This has been a consistent fact for decades, the American voter is vastly more concerned about things that affect them personally than some greater threat or ideological goal. America is a society of individualists so naturally most people’s demands from power are based their own individual needs. There is nothing surprising here, except for the desire to “unify the country” which has not been a priority in previous years.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Photo: Bernie speaks to youth better than men half his age

      Perhaps some people in the Beltway are concerned with Russia, but the voting masses are not and the narrative that “Bernie is getting help from Moscow, but then again he didn’t ask for it and is not involved” is very weak sauce. This will not dissuade any real large number of people away from voting for him as the Democratic Candidate.

      What Sanders offered in 2016 that got crushed by inner Democratic Party moves and Hillary Clinton is still fresh and relevant today – “Free” Stuff and cutesy poo Socialism. Just like last time the only hope the Dems have is the man from Vermont with the thick New York accent as all the other candidates are dismal offerings to the public. Sanders’ position is what a large portion of the population wants. Is it viable and can Sanders actually do it? These questions do not matter as the average voter does not think about them, they want their college debt annulled and medical care guaranteed and who cares how it gets done. Sanders promises this clearly and bluntly while the others are too busy looking at percentages from focus group reactions to shift their image from day-to-day. Bernie is really the only choice for the Democrats to compete with Trump.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Graphic: A simple message that is deeply relevant to Americans is what gets votes

      Biden managed to throw away all the years of positive brand recognition that he had attained thanks to standing next to Barack Obama by allowing #Russiagate to meltdown into #Ukrainegate expositing his corrupt dealings in America’s newest colony. Additionally there are lots of videos of Biden inappropriately touching children, which is far more important from an electoral standpoint. Biden had it and lost it.

      Tulsi Gabbard as a female veteran (who doesn’t look White) should have gotten the Left excited, but instead they trounced her as she seemed unwilling to play ball. Yang has one idea (Universal Basic Income) and the complete lack of personality needed to push it. Elizabeth Warren has all the problems of Hillary Clinton while still managing to have less humanity on camera. Stuffy anti-gun nut Buttigieg will probably give the Republicans the largest amount of minority votes seen during our lifetimes. Bloomberg is a boring version of Trump who seems to be obviously trying to buy his way into the election, which will ultimately backfire. Who is this Amy Klobuchar woman and how did she actually get a tiny amount of delegates? Bernie’s competition is a joke.

      Sanders, despite being the old rich bald White guy the Left claims to loath, is head and shoulders above anyone else in terms of his ability to deliver a message and get a positive reaction out of people. Basically, he has the showmanship and the ability to relate to people well enough to get the youth and minority vote. Most of all, he promises free stuff that he is going to tax us for which is the naive instant gratification solution that the masses want. The entire country has brutal college debt and the fear of life-crushing medical debt. Even though Sanders has almost zero chance of actually getting Scandinavian Style Socialized Medicine or a Student Loan Amnesty accomplished, just the promise alone is very tempting. When faced with the option of possibly getting tens of thousand of dollars of debt cancelled vs. a 0% chance of that happening with Trump, well you can see whom debt ridden Americans will be casting their ballots for.

      Yang’s Universal Basic Income also speaks to the millions of voices fighting to get from paycheck to paycheck but he was unable to deliver it. Sanders has the charisma and the big pleasant sounding simple solutions that the common man will buy into. If the Democrats again somehow try to sabotage Bernie, then they will be the ones feeling the “Bern” as they will be utterly crushed by Trump, allowing the Republican party to continue its transformation from the perception of a pro-business party to one of a multi-racial pro-Constitutional populist party. The DNC can either back someone they don’t like or shoot themselves in the foot, but judging by their overall irrational political views and emotion driven logic they are probably already trying to put the “magazine” in the revolver as we speak.


      Tyler Durden

      Fri, 02/28/2020 – 19:05

    Digest powered by RSS Digest

    Today’s News 28th February 2020

    • Fiat Cuts 1,500 Jobs At Canada Minivan Plant
      Fiat Cuts 1,500 Jobs At Canada Minivan Plant

      If the consumer has gone cold or just silly millennials not forming families because of their limited financial mobility due to insurmountable debts, minivan demand in North America is plunging, resulting in planned production cuts and job losses at one Fiat Chrysler Automobiles plant in Canada. 

      Bloomberg reports Fiat will cut production output at its minivan plant in Windsor, Ontario, beginning June 29. The wind-down of the factory will result in the loss of 1,500 jobs. The Italian-American automaker is phasing out the Dodge Grand Caravan by May. The plant will continue to build Chrysler Pacifica and Voyager minivans but at lower volumes. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      “This decision comes as the company works to align volumes with demand,” Fiat Chrysler spokeswoman Jodi Tinson said in an emailed statement, adding that the company “will make every effort to place indefinitely laid-off hourly employees in open full-time positions as they become available based on seniority.”

      Since 1983, the company produced 12 million minivans, turning out about a half-million per year since the early 1990s. Rising demand for minivans coincided with baby boomer family formations of the 1980/90s, and their great wealth creation from soaring home and stock prices allowed for large families and McMansions. However, everything changed when millennials started dominating the workforce in the last five years. Millennials are broke, plagued with insurmountable debts, delaying family formation and homebuying – so the need for a minivan to haul a family around has become obsolete.  

      Fiat slashed a production shift last September, and the latest comments from local union chief Dave Cassidy is that “We will not stop. We are going to do every damn thing we can to get everyone back to work!”

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Fiat has idled several North American plants on and off in the last several years, including the Windsor plant and a Jeep Cherokee plant in Belvidere, Illinois.

      On top of waning consumer demand and shifts in tastes, the auto market worldwide has been diving into recession. We have covered, at length, the collapse of auto sales not only in the U.S. but in leading global markets like China and Europe for the last 20 months. 


      Tyler Durden

      Fri, 02/28/2020 – 01:00

    • What Is The Deep State?
      What Is The Deep State?

      Via GreatGameIndia.com,

      A new focus on the Deep State in undermining the national interests has become a serious thought for many citizens. Not known to many, the Deep State has its origin in the British Empire and how the Round Table infiltrated former British colonies (including India) through America.

      Last year, fuel was added to this fire when internal memos were leaked from the British-run Integrity Initiative featuring a startling account of the techniques deployed by the anti-Russian British operation to infiltrate American intelligence institutions, think tanks and media.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The Integrity Initiative

      For those who may not know, The Integrity Initiative is an anti-Russian propaganda outfit funded to the tune of $140 million by the British Foreign office. Throughout 2019, leaks have been released featuring documents dated to the early period of Trump’s election, demonstrating that this organization, already active across Europe promoting anti-Russian PR and smearing nationalist leaders such as Jeremy Corbyn, was intent on spreading deeply into the State Department and setting up “clusters” of anti-Trump operatives. The documents reveal high level meetings that Integrity Initiative Director Chris Donnelly had with former Trump Advisor Sebastien Gorka, McCain Foundation director Kurt Volker, Pentagon PR guru John Rendon among many others.

      The exposure of the British hand behind the scenes affords us a unique glimpse into the real historical forces undermining America’s true constitutional tradition throughout the 20th century, as Mueller/the Five Eyes/Integrity Initiative are not new phenomena but actually follow a modus operandi set down for already more than a century. One of the biggest obstacles to seeing this modus operandi run by the British Empire is located in the belief in a mythology which has become embedded in the global psyche for over half a century and which we should do our best to free ourselves of.

      Myth of the “American Empire”

      While there has been a long-standing narrative promoted for over 70 years that the British Empire disappeared after World War II having been replaced by the “American Empire”, it is the furthest thing from the truth. America, as constitutionally represented by its greatest presidents (who can unfortunately be identified by their early deaths while serving in office), were never colonialist and were always in favor of reining in British Institutions at home while fighting British colonial thinking abroad.

      Franklin Roosevelt’s thirteen year-long battle with the Deep State, which he referred to as the “economic royalists who should have left America in 1776″, was defined in clear terms by his patriotic Vice-President Henry Wallace who warned of the emergence of a new Anglo-American fascism in 1944 when he said:

      “Fascism in the postwar inevitably will push steadily for Anglo-Saxon imperialism and eventually for war with Russia. Already American fascists are talking and writing about this conflict and using it as an excuse for their internal hatreds and intolerances toward certain races, creeds and classes.”

      The fact is that already in 1944, a policy of Anglo-Saxon imperialism had been promoted subversively by British-run think tanks known as the Round Table Movement and Fabian Society, and the seeds had already been laid for the anti-Russian cold war by those British-run American fascists. It is not a coincidence that this fascist Cold War policy was announced in a March 5, 1946 speech in Fulton, Missouri by none other than Round Table-follower and the butcher of Bengal, Winston Churchill.

      The Round Table Movement

      When the Round Table Movement was created with funds from the Rhodes Trust in 1902, a new plan was laid out to create a new technocratic elite to manage the re-emergence of the new British Empire and crush the emergence of nationalism globally. This organization would be staffed by generations of Rhodes Scholars who would receive their indoctrination in Oxford before being sent back to advance a “post-nation state” agenda in their respective countries.

      As this agenda largely followed the mandate set out by Cecil Rhodes in his Seventh Will who said “Why should we not form a secret society with but one object: the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilized world under British rule, for the recovery of the United States, and for the making of the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire?”

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      With the help of an anglophile, racist president in America, leading figures organizing these think tanks first advanced a program to create a “League of Nations” as the solution to the “nationalist problem” which humanity was told “caused” World War One. Nationalist forces in America rejected the idea that the constitution should be rendered obsolete and the plan for global governance failed. However that did not stop the Round Table Movement from trying again. Leading Round Table controller Lord Lothian (British Ambassador to the USA) complained of the “American problem” in 1918.

      There is a fundamentally different concept in regard to this question between Great Britain and the United States  as to the necessity of civilized control over politically backward peoples…. The inhabitants of Africa and parts of Asia have proved unable to govern themselves…. Yet America not only has no conception of this aspect of the problem but has been led to believe that the assumption of this kind of responsibility is iniquitous imperialism.

      They take an attitude towards the problem of world government exactly analogous to the one they [earlier] took toward the problem of the world war. If they are slow in learning we shall be condemned to a period of strained relations between the various parts of the English-speaking world. [We must] get into the heads of Canadians and Americans that a share in the burden of world government is just as great and glorious a responsibility as participation in the war”.

      A Chinese leader of the American-inspired republican revolution of 1911 named Sun Yat-sen warned of the likes of Lord Lothian and the League of Nations in 1924 when he said:

      “The nations which are employing imperialism to conquer others and which are trying to maintain their own favored positions as sovereign lords of the whole world are advocating cosmopolitanism [aka: global governance/globalization -ed] and want the world to join them… Nationalism is that precious possession by which humanity maintains its existence. If nationalism decays, then when cosmopolitanism flourishes we will be unable to survive and will be eliminated”.

      Council on Foreign Relations

      By 1919, the Round Table Movement changed its name to the Royal Institute for International Affairs (aka: Chatham House) with the “Round Table” name relegated to its geopolitical periodical. In Canada and Australia, branches were created in 1928 under the rubrics of “Canadian and Australian Institutes for International Affairs” (CIIA, AIIA). However in America, where knowledge of the British Empire’s subversive role was more widely known, the name “American Institute for International Affairs” was still too delicate. Instead the name “Council on Foreign Relations” was chosen and was chartered in 1921.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Rhodes Scholar William Yandall Elliot surrounded by a few of his leading disciples: Sir Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski Samuel Huntington and Pierre Trudeau

      Staffed with Rhodes Scholars and Fabians, the CFR (and its International Chatham House counterparts) dubbed themselves “independent think tanks” which interfaced with Rhodes Scholars and Fabians in academia, government and the private sector alike with the mission of advancing a foreign policy agenda that was in alignment with the British Empire’s dream of an Anglo-American “special relationship”. One such Rhodes Scholar was William Yandall Elliot, who played a major role mentoring Henry Kissinger and a generation of geo-politicians from Harvard, not the least of whom include Zbigniew Brzezinski, Pierre Elliot Trudeau and Samuel (Clash of Civilizations) Huntington.

      Coup Against FDR

      In Canada, five leading Rhodes Scholars were busy creating the League of Social Reconstruction as a self-described “Fabian Society of Canada” in 1931 which was meant to be a fascist/technocratic answer to the chaos of “greedy nationalism” that supposedly caused the economic collapse of Black Friday in 1929. During the same time in America, a different path to fascism was taken by these networks during the early 1930s. This plan involved installing a General named Smedley Butler into power as a puppet dictator steered by the Anglo-American establishment. Luckily for America and the world, General Butler blew the whistle on the coup against Franklin Roosevelt at the last minute.

      Kissinger’s British Takeover of America

      Though it took a few assassinations throughout the post war years, Kissinger’s takeover of the State Department ushered in a new era of British occupation of American foreign policy, whereby the republic increasingly became the “Dumb Giant” acting as “American Brawn for the British brains” using Churchill’s words. While a nihilistic generation of youth were tuning in on LSD, and an old guard of patriots surrounding Wallace and Kennedy had fallen to the “red scare” witch hunt, geopolitical theory was fed like a sweet poison down the throat of a sleeping nation, replacing a policy of peace and “win-win cooperation” advanced by true nationalist patriots as FDR, Wallace and the Kennedys, with an imperial clone masquerading as a republic.

      Sir Kissinger did nothing less than reveal his total allegiance to the British Empire on May 10, 1981 during a Chatham House conference in Britain when he described his relationship with the British Foreign office in the following terms:

      “The British were so matter-of-factly helpful that they became a participant in internal American deliberations, to a degree probably never practiced between sovereign nations… In my White House incarnation then, I kept the British Foreign Office better informed and more closely engaged than I did the American State Department… It was symptomatic”.

      During this period, Kissinger worked closely with CIA director George Bush Senior, who was later rewarded for his role in advancing the British-planned first war on Kuwait with a knighthood. This war set the stage for the second wave of Middle East wars beginning with the Anglo-Saudi orchestrated operation known as 9/11 and the ushering in of the new “post-nation state order” by Kissinger and Blair.

      This was the era which was celebrated by both Kissinger and Bush in sundry places as “the New World Order”.

      CTD Advisors – Rebuilding British Empire of Modern Times

      CTD Advisors is a UK-based advisory that with insider information from its highly-placed members aims to rebuild the British Empire of modern times. The firm is founded by the son of a Pakistani British spy and heavily infested with former British intelligence chiefs advocating foreign intervention in Kashmir.

      CTD Advisors is full of spies decorated as the Commanders of the British Empire.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      • Chris Nickols – a Retd Air Marshal in the Royal Air Force, whose final appointment was Chief of Defence Intelligence. Prior to that he served as Assistant Chief of the Defence Staff (Operations).

      • Lord Stuart Polak is the last Commander of the British Empire at CTD Advisors. A British Conservative politician and member of the House of Lords, he is the Honorary President of the Conservative Friends of Israel Group and widely known as an Israeli lobbyist.

      • Theresa Mary May the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom is perhaps the most high-profile member of CTD Advisors. After graduating in 1977, May worked at the Bank of England and is a member of the Church of England. In 2003 May was appointment to the Privy Council of the United Kingdom.

      • Sir Mark Lyall Grant awarded the Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George before being promoted to Knight Commander (KCMG).

      • Shoaib Bajwa, founder of CTD Advisors and the son of a Pakistani born British spy. In his obituary, Salim Nasir Bajwa, the father of Shoaib is said to have served in British security services for almost 10 years in 1950s and was engaged in multiple entrepreneurial activities in Pakistan and abroad during his life.

      • Shashi Tharoor is a serving Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha from Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, since 2009 (Mr. Tharoor has in a tweet claimed that “this is premature. They’ve been in discussions about a consultancy role but no agreement has yet been signed.”)

      In an interview to the London based Asian Voice, Shoaib explains the reason for founding CTD Advisors. He says, “Since the time of the Second World War, Britain has gradually lost influence in commonwealth states and the emerging markets. It has constricted itself by the EU and kept itself tied to that region.”

      He says, “western businesses severely lack insider knowledge” and through his company, he “wants to help construct new economic corridors, from within places such as Nigeria to countries and continents that are as far flung as India and Asia. Essentially, rebuilding a “Global Britain” in modern times.”

      General David Petraeus – Deep State Pointman in India

      Operation Timber Sycamore

      The Pentagon project Operation Timber Sycamore that spawned ISIS was the brainchild of former CIA Director General David Petraeus. It is now coordinated by the investment fund KKR, established by Henry Kravis and whose military activities are led by Petraeus.

      Intervention in India

      KKR where Petraeus sits as Chairman belongs to the equity partners who owns 80% stake in NXP Semiconductors who supplied chips for the Electronic Voting Machines in India – the integrity of which is being investigated by Indian agencies. Gen Petraus is also credited to have trained former United States National Security Advisor Herbert Raymond McMaster who is responsible for pulling India into the Anglo-American orbit as a “major defense partner” implemented through ‘Washington’s Man in New Delhi’.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Deep State Airbase in Kashmir

      Gen Petraeus is also the key player in the ongoing plot for an Anglo-American Airbase in Kashmir under the trusteeship of the United Nations – a policy drafted by Mountbatten himself. When asked about US intervention in Kashmir, then US Central Command Chief Gen Petraeus disclosed in a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Kashmir: “Together with my great diplomatic wingman Ambassador Richard Holbrooke, this effort actually has started”.

      As per intel with GreatGameIndia, Petraeus is the pointman for Deep State in India. In 2018, Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar and former CIA Director David Petraeus together formed strategies for the “dramatic transition of India in the New World Order” at a six-day Raisina Dialogue also attended by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

      Recently, a high-level conference was organized in London to chart our the strategies for this transition. Needless to say the key speaker for this UK-India Summit 2019 was Petraeus. The event is well known in intelligence circles to be organized by British intelligence.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      It were such meeting, albeit secret that took place in London in the late 90s where the blueprint for the return of East India Company was drafted. Called Vision 2020 the scheme was a brainchild of an American consultancy firm born out of US military, McKinsey and the Big Four. Fortunately the project was met with a lot of opposition and as a result was stopped in its tracks. Since then they have their eyes set on Kashmir now.

      *  *  *

      We need your support to carry on our independent and investigative research based journalism on the external and internal threats facing India. Your contribution however small helps us keep afloat. Kindly consider donating to GreatGameIndia.


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 23:45

    • "Fundamentally Parasitic" – Reddit CEO Lashes Out At "Spyware" TikTok 
      “Fundamentally Parasitic” – Reddit CEO Lashes Out At “Spyware” TikTok 

      Reddit CEO Steve Huffman criticized the Chinese TikTok video app, describing it as a “parasitic” application at an event Wednesday, reported TechCrunch.  

      Huffman was speaking in front of a large group of tech entrepreneurs gathered at the “Social 2030” conference hosted by Lightspeed Venture Partners and former Facebook VP of Product Sam Lessin’s VC firm Slow Ventures. 

      “Maybe I’m going to regret this, but I can’t even get to that level of thinking with them,” Huffman said. “Because I look at that app as so fundamentally parasitic, that it’s always listening, the fingerprinting technology they use is truly terrifying, and I could not bring myself to install an app like that on my phone.”

      “I actively tell people, ‘Don’t install that spyware on your phone,'” he said.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Huffman’s accuses the company and its Chinese parent company ByteDance of stealing sensitive user data. 

      A similar claim was made in a lawsuit filed in California federal court in December, accusing TikTok and ByteDance of stealing user data to sell targeted ads.

      “TikTok’s lighthearted fun comes at a high cost,” according to the lawsuit. 

      As of November, the app had been downloaded more than 1.5 billion times across the world. The US government has been actively warning personnel from using the Chinese app. 

      The Navy and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) have been the latest agencies to ban the app, citing potential security risks. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Chuck Schumer and Tom Cotton recently penned a letter to the head of national security, asking for an investigation into the app as a counterintelligence risk.

      The lawsuit also said the company had been secretly gathering biometric data on its users, including harvesting phone and social network contacts, location, IP addresses, email addresses, and other sensitive data. 

      Huffman’s critique of TikTok was part of a more extensive discussion at the conference on social media’s influence on society.


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 23:25

    • Milwaukee Mass Shooter Is A Black Elizabeth Warren Supporter
      Milwaukee Mass Shooter Is A Black Elizabeth Warren Supporter

      Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

      The Milwaukee man who killed five co-workers at a beer company’s corporate office is a black Elizabeth Warren supporter, providing a clue as to why the mass shooting disappeared from the discussion so quickly.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      51-year-old Anthony Ferrill showed up at the MillerCoors facility from where he had been fired earlier in the day wearing his uniform and carrying a silenced gun.

      He proceeded to gun down five colleagues before turning the weapon on himself.

      It subsequently emerged that Ferrill was an African-American Elizabeth Warren supporter (presuming that Ferrill shared the same political beliefs as his wife, who took a selfie with Warren at a rally last year).

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      “Ferrill’s wife posted photos of her family and expressing liberal political views,” confirms Heavy.com. “In July 2019, Ferrill’s wife attended a speech by U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren at South Division High School Gym in Milwaukee. Following the speech, Ferrill’s wife took a photo with the Massachusetts senator.”

      Despite being the worst mass shooting in Wisconsin’s history, the incident has largely disappeared from headlines and discussion, with online outrage noticeably dampened in comparison with other mass shootings.

      “I hope it’s clear to everyone that if political capital can’t be made off a tragedy it will get memoryholed faster than the Jussie Smollett hoax,” commented one Twitter user.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      If the culprit had been white, one suspects the media and Democrat politicians would be talking about white supremacy and gun control all week, but they seem oddly reserved on this occasion.

      *  *  *

      My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me. Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here. Support my sponsor – Emergency Survival Foods – delicious dishes & a 25 year shelf life!


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 23:05

    • Controversial NSA Phone Surveillance Program Led To Exactly Zero Arrests
      Controversial NSA Phone Surveillance Program Led To Exactly Zero Arrests

      <p content="A National Security Agency (NSA) programme that analysed logs of phone calls and text messages made by Americans cost $100m and yielded one investigation and zero arrests from 2015 to 2019.” data-reactid=”16″ type=”text”>In yet more absurdity and confirmation that Edward Snowden was never an “enemy of the state” — as top intelligence officials and some congressional leaders have charged for years — it’s been revealed that the latest National Security Agency (NSA) program to analyze logs of phone calls and text messages made by Americans was an utter failure and waste, yielding exactly zero arrests from 2015 to 2019, despite having swept up some trillion US phone records.

      <p content="A National Security Agency (NSA) programme that analysed logs of phone calls and text messages made by Americans cost $100m and yielded one investigation and zero arrests from 2015 to 2019.” data-reactid=”16″ type=”text”>It cost taxpayers $100 million and was reported to produce a mass amount of redundant information, revealing information that the FBI didn’t already know only twice, resulting in only one investigation which led to no charges. This according to a government watchdog group which briefed Congress last week on the matter, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB).

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      NSA headquarters, file photo.

      <p content="A National Security Agency (NSA) programme that analysed logs of phone calls and text messages made by Americans cost $100m and yielded one investigation and zero arrests from 2015 to 2019.” data-reactid=”16″ type=”text”>It was one among many broader controversial NSA programs to sweep up and analyze communications, which critics say routinely violate the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. 

      <p content="A National Security Agency (NSA) programme that analysed logs of phone calls and text messages made by Americans cost $100m and yielded one investigation and zero arrests from 2015 to 2019.” data-reactid=”16″ type=”text”>The NSA can still gather phone logs on Americans through other means of course, relying on other invasive programs, likely some of which still remain unknown and highly classified. 

      <p content="A National Security Agency (NSA) programme that analysed logs of phone calls and text messages made by Americans cost $100m and yielded one investigation and zero arrests from 2015 to 2019.” data-reactid=”16″ type=”text”>According to The Independent cited in Yahoo News:

      <p content="The low success rate and high cost support the NSA’s decision to shut off the programme in 2019. Politicians must now decide whether to allow the expiration of the legislation that makes the programme possible. The USA Freedom Act of 2015 expires on March 15.” data-reactid=”18″ type=”text”>The low success rate and high cost support the NSA’s decision to shut off the program in 2019. Politicians must now decide whether to allow the expiration of the legislation that makes the program possible. The USA Freedom Act of 2015 expires on March 15.

      The Trump administration is reportedly seeking to extend the life of the program, in order to provide the government’s top signals intelligence spy agency with a future option to initiate the program if deemed necessary.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      The report in The Independent further said “The 2015 Act shifted responsibility for data collection from the government to telecommunications companies.”

      The end result of this practice, alarmingly, was that “In some cases they would send the agency more data than they were legally allowed to collect.”


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 22:45

    • Bernie Sanders Is Funded By The Wealthiest Zip Codes In America
      Bernie Sanders Is Funded By The Wealthiest Zip Codes In America

      Authored by Daniel Greenfield via FrontPageMag.com,

      In Los Angeles, it’s not unusual to see a Beemer streak by with a Bernie 2020 sticker on the back bumper. There’s no such thing as a poor socialist and Bernie’s backers tend to have lots of cash.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      While Bernie Sanders accuses Bloomberg of trying to buy his way to the nomination, the socialist bought his surge with $50 million in spending. He raised $25 million just in January. There’s more buying to do.

      And while he boasts of backing from small donors, the wealth of his donors is anything but small.

      Google, Amazon, and Microsoft. Their employees are three of the top 4 Bernie donors. Apple is in fifth place. These dot coms are not exactly organizations known to employ members of the proletariat. Google software engineers have sent thousands of dollars, individually, to Bernie.

      Google’s senior engineers, like the ones who have backed Bernie, make $250,000 a year.

      Geographically, Bernie’s top dollar zip code is 94110 in San Francisco. The average household income in this part of the Mission District, specifically the Inner Mission, the Bernal Heights area, is $166,302. The median home value is around $1.5 million and the median rent is almost $5,000 a month.

      There are no poor socialists in what was dubbed as “the hottest neighborhood in San Francisco.”

      This was the area that Salon founder David Talbot blasted as the “hottest zip code in the country” overrun by “Silicon Valley movers and shakers” in “new-model Teslas, BMWs and Uber limousines”. It’s only fitting that it should also be the spigot through which so much of Bernie’s tech bros dollars flow.

      The second top dollar Bernie zip code in San Francisco, 94117 or Haight-Ashbury, seems like a better fit for Bernie. But the Summer of Love has long since given way to the Winter of Trust Fund Hipsters in the Haight where the average income is $201,503 and average home values top $1.6 million.

      The media has made much of Bernie’s flow of donations from Brooklyn. But the money isn’t coming from the working-class Brooklynites of Bernie’s old neighborhood, but the gentrifying areas of the borough. 11215 or Park Slope is the second biggest top dollar zip code of Bernie donors.

      The neighborhood, formerly urban, known as the home of Mayor Bill de Blasio, and the Park Slope Food Co-Op and its anti-Semitic push to boycott Israel, is filled with renovated brownstones filled with wealthy hipsters. It’s a place where a three-bedroom apartment can go for $2.9 million.

      To New Yorkers, Park Slope has become a curse word embodying everything wrong with the new elite.

      In third place on Bernie’s donor list is 10025 or the Upper West Side of Manhattan. With an average rental price of $4,695, it’s not exactly an inexpensive place to live. The UWS is the 8th richest neighborhood with a $190,281 mean household income. And this is where Bernie’s cash comes from.

      11238 or Prospect Heights, in fourth place, is a newly gentrified neighborhood in Brooklyn where the median sales price passed $1 million, and you can expect to spend $800,000 for a one-bedroom co-op. The formerly urban neighborhood has been colonized by wealthy hipsters from Park Slope, and much of what goes for Park Slope also goes for Prospect Heights. They’re the gentrifiers funding Bernie Sanders.

      In fifth place is 98103, the Seattle neighborhood of Wallingford. With an average household income of $124,504, the University of Washington neighborhood with its $800,000 homes isn’t working class. Among the cheapest housing options is a $400,000 one-bedroom condo that’s a mere 757 square feet. The area is so expensive because it’s home to tech employees, including Microsoft engineers.

      Microsoft employees are among Bernie’s top dollar donors.

      And in seventh place is 90026. The Echo Park neighborhood in Los Angeles is a hipster haven which boasts the most expensive pizza in the city where the median price for housing is $813,000, and rents can hit $6,700 a month. Like Park Slope and Haight-Ashbury, Echo Park is full of wealthy hipsters.

      That’s Bernie’s core demographic.

      In eight place is the Logan Square neighborhood of Chicago at zip code 60647. Logan Square is among the most expensive neighborhoods in the Windy City. A condo will set you back over half a million dollars. The rush got so bad that a garage transformed into a home was going for $2.85 million. With its hipster bars and a farmers market, it’s the perfect area for Bernie’s upscale and trendy base.

      Ninth and tenth on the list of Bernie’s money neighborhoods are two expensive Manhattan areas.

      10003, Union Square and Greenwich Village in downtown Manhattan, is home to NYU, once a hive of angry radicals, now stuffed full of luxury co-ops with wealthy radicals, where condos cost millions of dollars. Greenwich Village has been listed as the ninth most expensive neighborhood in New York City. So, it’s only fitting that it’s the ninth on the list of areas funding the Sanders 2020 presidential campaign.

      In tenth place is 10011 or Chelsea and the West Village of Manhattan. It’s also the single most expensive zip code in New York City. Not only is it the most expensive area in New York, but it’s the 23rd most expensive area in the country with a median sale price approaching $2 million. And with average monthly rents of over $4,000, it’s the 19th most expensive rental area in the entire United States.

      It’s also home to New York’s Silicon Alley, the city’s tech industry ghetto of dot com and fintech startups.

      What do Bernie’s top donor zip codes have in common? Beyond wealth, Bernie’s cash flow is coming from a handful of very blue cities, almost all of them in California and New York City. Only two of the top ten zip codes are located outside San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York City. That alone conveys the insular and unrepresentative nature of Bernie’s funding base compared to the rest of the country.

      Bernie’s campaign is powered by the very concentrations of power and wealth that he condemns.

      The unrepresentative nature of Bernie’s backers isn’t just a matter of geography, but of culture. Some of Bernie’s top dollar zip codes overlap with the tech industry. His candidacy represents another example of how the tech industry has not only distorted our economy, but also warped our politics.

      Much of Bernie’s money comes from hipster hubs where wealthy young white people in major urban areas have made old neighborhoods, including Bernie’s Brooklyn, unaffordable to the working class and middle-class people who once used to live there. Bernie’s donors, especially in places like Prospect Heights and Echo Park have also played a significant role in displacing minorities and the poor.

      Follow Bernie’s money and it’s easy to see his campaign for the hypocritical farce that it is.

      Tech industry bros and trust fund hipsters are buying the nomination for Bernie, while displacing minority candidates, the way they bought up brownstones in Brooklyn and displaced black people.

      He’s the candidate of class warfare, not on behalf of the poor, but of young wealthy people seeking more power and influence at the expense of the more established wealth of an older generation. It’s tech industry bros warring for influence with fossil fuel titans, not for the poor, but for themselves.

      Bernie’s base is much less than 1%. Call it the 0.001%. A wealthy and influential young lefty elite with disproportionate influence over the internet is setting the nation’s agenda using digital media, tech dominance, and the Weekend at Bernie’s campaign of a senile socialist who barely knows where he is and won’t release his medical records after a heart attack because they will show he’s barely there.

       “Not me. Us.”

      That’s Bernie’s slogan. It’s true, just not how people are meant to perceive it. Bernie is little more than a puppet of the campaign pros who made him a household name in 2016 and are trying to make him more than that now. The “Us” are not Americans or even Democrats. It’s the elites of these zip codes.

      0.001% of the country is using a confused elderly socialist as a proxy for imposing their will on America.

      The 2020 election will be a test of wills between Americans and the 0.001% living in Park Slope, Echo Park, the Mission District, and Haight-Ashbury. After eight years of hipster rule under Obama, is the country ready to bow its heads and let a handful of wealthy young radicals run their lives again?


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 22:25

    • CDC Suggests Men Shave Their Beards To Protect Against Covid-19
      CDC Suggests Men Shave Their Beards To Protect Against Covid-19

      The rapid spread of Covid-19 across the world has prompted federal health officials this week to warn Americans that an outbreak could be imminent.

      When it comes to preparing for a health crisis, good hygiene practices are needed to limit the transmission of the virus, such as mask-wearing and regularly sanitizing hands. 

      Nancy Messonnier, the director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said earlier this week that the virus is rapidly evolving and expanding, it’s only a matter of time before confirmed cases in the US start increasing.

      Additionally, HHS Secretary Alex Azar told the Senate this week that the Trump administration is seeking upwards of $2.5 billion to stock up on masks, ventilators, and other virus-fighting tools.

      About 30 million N95 masks are stockpiled, but another 300 million more are needed for healthcare workers, Azar said.

      A 2017 workplace safety infographic compiled by the CDC has been circulating social media in recent days, outlining the wearer of the mask must shave beards and mustaches for a tight fit.

      Any facial hair within the respirator should be fine, but “full beard,” “chin curtain,” “mutton chops,” and “extended goatee,” to name a few, are not permitted for a properly functioning mask, and must be shaved off if the wearer wants to survive a virus crisis. “Soul patch,” “pencil,” and “zorro” are mustaches that work.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      For those who want to keep their mustaches but continue to wear protective gear to shield against the virus, you might have to spend a few bucks. We outlined last week that Ao Air’s Atmos Faceware is the next generation of masks to block germs up to 50 times better than traditional masks currently on the market.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The company commissioned its own study (note: the research isn’t published nor peer-reviewed) describes how Atmos Faceware is a much better solution against particulate matter than standard air filter mask certified by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

      Ao Air claims Atmos Faceware is unlike traditional face masks because it doesn’t require an airtight seal to be effective, which means the wearer doesn’t have to shave.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The high-tech mask costs between $350 to $400 and could be a hot commodity among the hipster crowd, who want to keep their “van dyke” or “dali” mustaches during a possible pandemic.


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 22:05

    • We Just Experienced The Fastest 10% Correction In S&P500 History
      We Just Experienced The Fastest 10% Correction In S&P500 History

      If only there were signs that the market was poised for a crash. Oh wait, there were, like the market being the most overbought and complacent ever, with every investor all-in as recently as last month:

      … only to become even more overbought and even more complacent, with investors even more all-in…

      … with record leverage and unprecedented “smart money” concentration in the same handful of stocks:

      … and since nothing could dent the relentless Nasdaq ascent, even as Apple cut guidance due to the coronavirus…

      … retail investors unleashed a never-before seen buying spree, and not just momentum stocks, but calls of momentum stocks…

      … to the point where retail investors’ record levered beta helped them outperform the entire hedge fund class!

      … and ushered in the “Profane, Greedy Traders of Reddit” who “Are Shaking Up the Stock Market” even as US consumers just reported the highest median current value of their market investments.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      In short, everyone felt invincible, and all thanks to the Fed’s QE4 which injected $600BN in the market and made even a modest drop appear impossible.

      Only… it was not meant to last, and in a market that took the express elevator up and the Wile-E Coyote anvil down, less than a week after markets hit an all time high, stocks crashed, suffering three 3%+ drops in the past week as algos suddenly realized that not even the Fed can print viral antibodies, resulting in the biggest one-day Dow Jones point drop on record (down 1,191 on “Viral Thursday”), but more importantly, the fastest 10% correction from an all-time Dow Jones high since just a few months before the start of the Great Depression.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      What about S&P? Well, since that particular index wasn’t around at the time of the Great Depression, one has to look elsewhere, which is what Deutsche Bank’s Torsten Slok has done, and as he shows in the next slide, the outcome is just as stark: with just 6 trading days passing between last week’s the all-time S&P500 high and today’s 10% correction, this was the fastest correction from a peak on record.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      This means that in under six trading sessions, the US stock market lost half of its massive (mostly post-QE4) gains from all of last year.

      Even more amazing, is that in under a week the S&P has lost a third of all its peak gains (which hit 62% last week) since the Trump election!

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The only question now is what will Trump do – besides more jawboning that the US is extremely well prepared for “whatever this thing is” – to prevent even more furious losses in the market, culminating with the fastest bear market in history.


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 21:45

    • "Worst Thing In My Career" – US Stocks Suffer Fastest Collapse From Record Highs Since Great Depression
      “Worst Thing In My Career” – US Stocks Suffer Fastest Collapse From Record Highs Since Great Depression

      This didn’t age well…

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      A sea of red…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The Dow has collapsed from a record high into ‘correction’ in the space of just six days. As we detailed earlier, this is the fastest collapse from an all-time peak since 1928, just ahead of The Great Depression:

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      As Guggenheim’s Scott Minerd declared on Bloomberg TV:

      “…this is possibly the worst thing I have seen in my career… it’s hard to imagine a scenario in which you can contain the virus threat,” adding that “Europe and China are probably already in recession and US GDP will take a 1.5-2.0% hit.”

      “The stock market could be down 15-20%… and would likely force The Fed’s hand.”

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Investors are piling into safe-havens (bonds and bullion) as they dump stocks…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Still, could be worse…

      The market is already demanding 3 rate-cuts this year…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      With the odds of an emergency cut in March soaring…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      And, stocks have erased most of the ‘NotQE’/Repo liquidty bailout gains…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      From the turn down last Wednesday, all the major stock indices are in correction territory, down over 10%…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The Dow was down over 12% from its highs at the lows of the day today…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Today was the biggest single-day point drop in Dow history…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Today’s price action was stunning. Weakness overnight extended lower after the open, then a massive ramp higher (pushing Trannies and Small Caps briefly green), before it all fell apart again…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Dow futures show the action best – Futures were down almost 1000 points, extending the overnight losses through the open, that was followed by a quick 800 point ramp – which failed to take out overnight highs – and then faded back towards the lows into the close…Dow 26k seemed the Maginot Line…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      S&P closed below 3,000…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      and broke below its 200DMA (as did the Dow and Russell 2000), Nasdaq closed below its 100DMA…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      FANG Stocks have lost $350 billion in market cap in the last 6 days…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Bank stocks continue to bloodbath…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Airlines staged an epic comeback today after crashing at the open, but faded lower into the close to end red…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Why is everyone so surprised at the drop in the Dow, when earnings expectations have already plummeted…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      VIX topped 36 intraday, dipped a little, then ramped back to 34 in the last hour…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      VIX is also catching up to the outlook suggested by the collapsing yield curve…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Credit markets are crashing wider in cash and derivatives…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      And rather stunningly, XOM’s dividend yield has exploded to its highest since Feb 1986 (as the stock price crashes)…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Before we move on to bonds, this is utterly insane!!! China is now dramatically outperforming US and EU stocks since the start of the virus headlines…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Today’s two hour panic-buying stocks, panic-selling bonds effort looked a lot like pension-rebalancing…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Lots of volatility in bond land today with yields crashing overnight to fresh lows, ramping back to unch after the US cash equity open, then falling back towards the record lows (down 4-5bps across the curve on the day)…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      30Y Yields fell to a 1.74% handle!

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      The dollar tumbled today to one-week lows…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Cryptos bounced back today after an ugly week…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Gold and copper were flat today as silver and crude tumbled…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      WTI collapsed today to a $45 handle, down a stunning 30% from the early January spike highs on Iran missile strikes…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      And as oil prices crash, Energy credit markets are collapsing – HY Energy OAS at widest since April 2016…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Finally, gold was flat today as the odds of a Bernie nomination slipped modestly… but that correlation is quite stunning…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Partying like its the end of 1999…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      We’re gonna need more liquidity…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Somebody’s got to get their boot back on the throat of global financial market volatility…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Bloomberg

      Seemed like the right time to bring out the deer!!

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 21:35

    • Bank Of America: "Nowhere To Hide"
      Bank Of America: “Nowhere To Hide”

      It’s not just the markets that are in freefall, so are crushed revised estimates of global economic growth.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Overnight Bank of America has taken the axe to its GDP growth forecasts, and in a note titled “Nowhere to Hide”, the bank’s chief economist Ethan Harris, writes that “we have taken another slice out of our 2020 global GDP forecast. The downward revisions are broad based, and we now expect just 2.8% global growth this year (Table 1). This would be the first sub-3% print since the financial crisis.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Explaining why it’s “Gloom but not doom”, Harris writes that last month he cut his 2020 China growth forecast from 5.8% to 5.6%, “but left other major economies unchanged on the expectation of a brief and contained disruption. Our previous base case now looks increasingly like a best-case scenario.” However, with the V-shaped recovery no longer looking realistic, BofA’s new forecasts “account for a more “U-shaped” growth recovery, and a greater permanent loss in output.”

      Explaining further, BofA writes that the weakness in the global economy is being driven by three factors.

      • The first is the lack of momentum going into the year. When we published our year-ahead report last November, we were calling for just 3.2% global growth, which was already well below trend, in our view. Since then 4Q GDP came in even weaker than expected, suggesting that trade and tech war uncertainty remained a headwind for global growth.
      • The second factor, of course, is China’s aggressive response to the COVID-19 outbreak. Economic disruptions have lasted for more than a month and many migrant workers are yet to return to work, leaving factories unable to operate at full capacity. As a result we have cut our China forecast again. We expect roughly zero sequential growth in 1Q, and a more delayed recovery, pushing 2020 growth down to 5.2%.
      • Last, we are now looking for large spillover effects. Extended disruptions in China should hurt global supply chains. Weak tourist flows will be another headwind for Asia. And limited outbreaks, similar to the one in Italy, are possible in many countries, leading to more quarantines and weighing on confidence. Therefore we have cut our forecasts across the board. We project just 2.2% growth outside China, also the lowest rate since 2009.

      Not surprisingly, Harris cautions that “while the distribution of risks around our forecasts is now more balanced, we think the risks are still skewed to the downside.” The reason for that, is that his forecasts “do not incorporate a global pandemic that would basically shut down economic activity in many major cities. Accordingly, we are also not calling for a global recession (i.e., sub-2% global growth).” In other words, BofA’s global recession forecast will depend on whether China can reboot its economy, something it has been scrambling to do by fabricating low infection numbers and manipulating its Coronavirus statistics.

      The risk, of course, is that in its panicked scramble to restart the economy, Beijing launches a second wave of infections, destroys what little confidence the people have in the communist party, and terminally cripples its – and the global – economy.


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 21:25

    • Is It Racist? NYPost Journalist Busted Mocking Indian Reporter During White House Presser
      Is It Racist? NYPost Journalist Busted Mocking Indian Reporter During White House Presser

      Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

      A New York Post journalist who once wrote about casual racism being widespread was caught on camera mocking an Indian reporter behind his back during a White House press conference.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The clip shows Ebony Bowden pulling strange faces and asking another journalist sat next to her “who is this guy?” as the Indian expresses his best wishes that the Trump administration will “keep America safe” from coronavirus.

      Bowden then appears to look at another journalist to her right and bursts out in laughter before shaking her head.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      She then scowls as if trying to understand the Indian reporter’s accent before raising her eyebrow.

      The Twitter user who posted the video remarked, “Who is that reporter in the green mocking an Indian reporter? I bet she thinks Trump is racist..”

      He then posted a link to an article Bowden had written in which she asserts that “casual racism” is “widespread” in Australia.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      The Indian reporter in question, Raghubir Goyal, has been a White House reporter since the days of President Carter, so it’s unlikely that Bowden hasn’t seen or heard him before.

      *  *  *

      My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me. Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here. Support my sponsor – Emergency Survival Foods – delicious dishes & a 25 year shelf life!


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 21:05

    • It Begins: Hawaii Stores Empty Out On Coronavirus "Panic Buying"
      It Begins: Hawaii Stores Empty Out On Coronavirus “Panic Buying”

      Hawaii is urging residents to prepare for a potential breakout of Covid-19 amid new warnings earlier this week from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that the deadly virus quickly spreading across the world could cause a “significant disruption” to American life.

      Although there are no confirmed virus cases in Hawaii (the state Health Department says 80 people are self-monitoring for the coronavirus in Hawaii after recent travel to China), the CDC’s warning sparked a buying frenzy among residents this week as they emptied store shelves of food and supplies. 

      Twitter handle @zoeywoeyzoey said, “Hawaii Sam’s club is sold out of toilet paper hand sanitizer alcohol.” 

      KHON Honolulu said flatbed carts “were overflowing with boxes of canned goods, bottled water, toilet paper, and paper towels” at Costco’s Iwilei location. 

      “The essentials toilet paper, paper towels, bottles of water, soap, a lot of Clorox stuff, cleaning supplies… I figure with all the coronavirus scare and everything, it’s better to be safe than sorry,” said Honolulu resident Keane Zakimi.

      Hawaii Foodbank told KHON that residents are panic buying non-perishable foods and medical masks. They said the same fear that is seen in Asia has now spread to Hawaii. 

      “If there’s no inventory at the store, then there’s very little for stores to donate to the Foodbank and also at home if you’re stocking up and hoarding for your family, the last thing you’re thinking about is making a donation. It impacts us in a very great way,” said Hawaii Foodbank President Ron Mizutani.

      Honolulu Star-Advertiser said retailers across the state are experiencing shortages of 3M N95 masks. We noted last month that masks were selling out across the US. Prices of the masks have doubled or tripled since mid-January. 

      It’s only a matter of time before a virus case is confirmed in the state, and this could lead to an epic bust of its top industry: tourism, resulting in a recession for the island economy.


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 20:45

    • Retail Investors Just Got Nuked: Here Are The Stocks They Are Puking
      Retail Investors Just Got Nuked: Here Are The Stocks They Are Puking

      Stocks typically take the escalator up and elevator down. However, over the past three months, it seemed the most popular retail stocks were taking the express elevator to the top floor (in part thanks to a record surge in call buying among a certain group of reddit “investors”).

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      As a result, just this weekend we observed that in this “bizarro market”, retail investors had managed to outperform hedge funds YTD, a divergence which we said we “doubt divergence will last long”.

      We didn’t have long to wait, and with stocks now skipping the elevator altogether and going the gravitational freefall route and crashing back to earth with the Dow entering the fastest correction from an all time high since just months before the Great Depression…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      … the Goldman Sachs Retail Favorite basket, after returning more than 16% YTD just last week, is now down for the year (curiously, it is still outperforming the GS Hedge Fund VIP basket which as of this morning is down more than 3% in 2020.)

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      And while we pointed out that retail momo darling Tesla has gotten crushed, it’s just one of the 50 or so retail favorite stocks that make up the Goldman basket. So for those wondering which stocks they should short if this is indeed the long-awaited retail capitulation, the answer is below: these are all the 50 stocks that make up the Goldman Retail Favorites list.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Meanwhile, a quick look at the r/wallstreetbets forum on reddit, where the world’s biggest momentum chasers have now gathered (even making it to Bloomberg in the process), and where a lot of millennials got very rich, very fast, well… they are probably not quite as rich any more.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 20:44

    • The 2020 Democratic Primary Is Already The Most Expensive In History
      The 2020 Democratic Primary Is Already The Most Expensive In History

      Authored by Karl Evers-Hillstrom via OpenSecrets.org

      With only a sprinkling of delegates pledged to presidential contenders, the 2020 Democratic primary is already the most expensive. Candidates vying for the Democratic nomination have spent more than $1.2 billion, more than they shelled out throughout 2008 or 2016.

      At this point in the highly competitive 2008 Democratic primary, candidates spent a combined $313 million, or $382 million when adjusting for inflation. The 2020 primary is roughly six times more expensive than the 2016 race was at this point in the cycle.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Source: Ethan Miller/Getty Images

      Two billionaires, Michael Bloomberg and Tom Steyer, are driving the spending record by self-funding their campaigns at unprecedented levels. They account for more than half of the total spending by primary candidates. But even when excluding the two billionaires, the 2020 Democratic primary is still the most expensive of its kind at this point in the cycle.

      The 2020 primary includes more competitive candidates than previous races, and those candidates are unwilling to drop out of the race before Super Tuesday. That comes as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) increasingly becomes the favorite to win the nomination while the more moderate candidates split votes

      Bloomberg, who based his expensive strategy around Super Tuesday, has urged his primary opponents to drop out or risk giving Sanders the nomination. The 2020 Democrats didn’t go along with that plan. Instead, they told Bloomberg to drop out

      That stubbornness is driving up campaign spending. And it’s one aspect that separates the 2020 race from past contests. In 2008, the primary featured two fundraising giants, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, and well-funded contenders like Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.), Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson. However, each of those low-polling candidates ended their campaigns before Super Tuesday. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      This time around, the Democratic candidates trailing Sanders still believe they can win despite facing odds that become less favorable with each primary result. Former Vice President Joe Biden says his campaign will rebound with a win in South Carolina. Former South Bend, Ind., mayor Pete Buttigieg launched a massive Super Tuesday fundraising push last week. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) embraced a super PAC that is supporting her cash-poor campaign ahead of the March contest. 

      Six Democratic candidates spent north of $60 million through January, according to the most recent filings. Meanwhile, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), a late riser in the field, spent nearly $31 million. 

      At its peak last year, the Democratic field included two dozen candidates, each of whom were focused on earning a spot in national debates. The Democratic National Committee required candidates to reach polling and individual donor thresholds to participate in the debates. Those rules forced candidates to spend big on social media advertisements and email lists to attract small-dollar donors, even though they were sure to lose money on those transactions. Steyer spent millions of dollars on Facebook ads that urged users to give just $1. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Sources: MetrocosmFederal Election CommissionNew York Magazine

      The DNC scrapped those rules late last month in exchange for stricter polling thresholds and guaranteed spots for those who had already won delegates. That opened the door for Bloomberg — a recent six-figure donor to the committee — to make the debates. The decision was criticized by current and former candidates who had crafted their strategy around the DNC rules. Bloomberg’s campaign, which is entirely funded by the New York billionaire himself, is spending $6 million per day

      Still, it’s the third highest spender in the race who has the best shot at the Democratic nomination. With his dominant win in Nevada, Sanders secured his third popular vote victory in three contests. Sanders’ fundraising haul of $133 million is on par with Hillary Clinton’s $130 million total at this point in 2016, and he has nearly $17 million cash on hand compared to $19 million combined for the rest of the non-billionaires. 

      Researcher Doug Weber contributed to this report.


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 20:25

    • 2 California Community College Students Exposed To Mystery Coronavirus Patient; S.Korea Nears 1,000 New Cases In 48 Hours: Live Updates
      2 California Community College Students Exposed To Mystery Coronavirus Patient; S.Korea Nears 1,000 New Cases In 48 Hours: Live Updates

      Summary:

      • Nigeria confirms first case
      • South Korea reports 256 new cases
      • WHO says outbreak in Iran likely worse than official numbers suggest; outbreak could go in “any direction”
      • Cali monitoring 8400, 28 cases in the state
      • China reports 327 new cases and 44 new deaths on Thursday
      • Dozens of hospital staffers who treated US coronavirus patient with ‘unknown’ origin being ‘monitored’
      • Facebook cancels annual ‘F8′ developers’ conference
      • 700 in New York asked to ‘self-isolate’
      • Iran confirms 26 deaths, vice president for women and family affairs infected
      • The Netherlands has confirmed its first case
      • Northern Ireland confirms first case
      • Norway confirms three new cases
      • Germany confirms 14 new cases
      • Lagarde: Not yet time for ECB to intervene to fight economic backlash of outbreak
      • HHS says risk to public remains “low”
      • Italy reports 3 more deaths, bringing total to 17; total cases hit 650
      • Pence, Azar appoint Mnuchin, Kudlow & Surgeon General Adams to Coronavirus Task Force
      • Starbucks says it has reopened 85% of Chinese restaurants
      • Azar: Sonoma case might be ‘community transmission’
      • Salvini meets with Italian president amid national unity government speculation
      • South Korean new cases surpass China’s new cases as SK confirms 505 new cases
      • China, Japan close school nationwide
      • CDC fears ‘community outbreak’ in Sonoma County after discovering first US case of “unknown origin”
      • CDC says patient from Solano county
      • Saudi Arabia suspends pilgrimages to Holy Sites
      • Hawaiian Airlines suspends service to South Korea
      • Brazil’s neighbors take steps to keep virus out

      * * *

      Update (2008): South Korea reported 256 newly confirmed cases in its first update of the day on Friday (this week, health officials have been updating the count every 12 hours or so). The new batch brings the small East Asian country’s total to 2,022, and also puts South Korea on track to confirm more than 1,000 new cases in 48 hours.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      There have been a flurry of other interesting developments in the global coronavirus outbreak over the last hour or so:

      -Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa with 200M people and a population density of 212.04 individuals per sq km, has confirmed its first coronavirus case.

      -Following the hysteria in California, Hawaii health officials said they will ‘soon’ begin testing for the virus, and the state already has 80 people on ‘self-monitoring’

      -Obama’s Ebola Czar has lashed out at the Trump administration following an unflattering NYT story

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      On another note: Check out the front page of “The Australian”, the Murdoch-controlled broadsheet that is Australia’s only nationally distributed general-interest newspaper:

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      * * *

      Update (1945): Japanese Health Minister Katsunobu Kato said Friday morning in Tokyo that he wouldn’t rule out the possibility that that the schools might be shut down longer than 1-2 weeks, as the government presently hopes. He said it will depend on developments with the outbreak.

      * * *

      Update (1915T): Fox 40 Sacramento is reporting that students at two Los Rios community colleges briefly came into contact with the 60th American coronavirus patient – the one whose case might be the first harbinger of a “community outbreak” inside the US.

      According to a statement from the Los Rios Community College District, two students – one who attends American River College and one who attends Cosumnes River College – both came into contact with the patient in their roles as ‘medical professionals’.

      The exposure happened last week.

      Sacramento County’s public health department said there doesn’t appear to be a risk of potential exposure. Both students were told to self-quarantine.

      The school has no plans to cancel classes.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Sure, the schools may not have cancelled classes. But they can’t force the students to attend, either.

      * * *

      Update (1900ET): Chinese health officials have released the latest numbers, and once again, demonstrated a sharp drop. Once again, it appears the latest number of new cases – 327 for the whole country – is the lowest daily report since the crisis began. Notably, officials only reported 14 new cases outside of Wuhan.

      • MAINLAND CHINA REPORTS 327 NEW CONFIRMED CASES OF CORONAVIRUS ON FEB 27 VS 433 ON FEB 26
      • CHINA’S HUBEI PROVINCE, EPICENTRE OF CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK, REPORTS 318 NEW CASES ON FEB 27 VS 409 ON FEB 26
      • MAINLAND CHINA’S TOTAL NUMBER OF CONFIRMED CORONAVIRUS CASES HITS 78,824 AS OF END-FEB 27
      • CHINA’S HUBEI PROVINCE, EPICENTRE OF CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK, REPORTS 41 NEW DEATHS ON FEB 27 VS 26 ON FEB 26
      • MAINLAND CHINA’S TOTAL NUMBER OF CORONAVIRUS DEATHS REACHES 2,788 AS OF END-FEB 27
      • DEATH TOLL FROM CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK IN CHINA’S HUBEI AT 2,682 AS OF END-FEB 27

      Here’s the NHC press release, translated via Google:

      At 04:00 on February 27, 31 provinces (autonomous regions, municipalities) and the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps reported 327 new confirmed cases and 44 new deaths (41 in Hubei, 2 in Beijing, and Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps 1 Cases), newly added 452 suspected cases.

      On the same day, 3,622 cases of discharged patients were cured, 10,525 close contacts were released from medical observation, and 394 severe cases were reduced.

      As of 24:00 on February 27, according to reports from 31 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) and the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, there were 39,919 confirmed cases (among which 7,952 were severe cases), 36,117 cases were discharged from the hospital, and 2,788 were dead cases A total of 78824 confirmed cases were reported, and 2308 suspected cases were reported. A total of 656,054 close contacts were traced, and 65,225 close contacts were still in medical observation.

      There were 318 newly confirmed cases in Hubei (313 in Wuhan), 3203 cases of cured discharges (2498 in Wuhan), 41 deaths (28 in Wuhan), and 36,829 confirmed cases (30,179 in Wuhan). Among them, 7633 cases were severe cases (6775 cases in Wuhan). A total of 26403 discharged patients were cured (15826 in Wuhan), a total of 2682 deaths (2132 in Wuhan), and 65914 confirmed cases (48137 in Wuhan). There were 332 new suspected cases (295 in Wuhan) and 1989 suspected cases (1488 in Wuhan).

      A total of 135 confirmed cases were reported from Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan: 93 cases in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (26 cases discharged, 2 deaths), 10 cases in the Macau Special Administrative Region (8 cases discharged), and 32 cases in Taiwan (6 cases discharged, 1 case died).
       

      * * *

      Update (1655ET): More comments from CDC Director Redfield are hitting the tape. His focus: the virus’s ability to survive on surfaces.

      • CDC DIRECTOR REDFIELD SAYS WE ARE AGGRESSIVELY EVALUATING HOW LONG CORONAVIRUS CAN SURVIVE AND BE INFECTIOUS ON SURFACES
      • CDC DIRECTOR REDFIELD SAYS CORONAVIRUS SURVIVAL TIME ON COPPER AND STEEL SURFACES IS “PRETTY TYPICAL… ABOUT 2 HOURS”, OTHER SURFACES LIKE CARDBOARD OR PLASTIC IS LONGER
      • CDC DIRECTOR REDFIELD SAYS CORONAVIRUS SURVIVAL ON SURFACES MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO OUTBREAK ON DIAMOND PRINCESS CRUISE
      • CDC DIRECTOR REDFIELD SAYS CORONAVIRUS SURVIVAL ON SURFACES MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO OUTBREAK ON DIAMOND PRINCESS CRUISE

      * * *

      Update (1640ET): It looks like the CDC is responding to a critical NYT story published late Wednesday that exposed the agency for waiting days to test the California patient whose coronavirus infection seemingly has no ties to China, or any other cases, which means she may have contracted the virus domestically from an unknown source.

      The CDC said Thursday evening that they will start testing people with unexplained, severe symptoms. The patient in question was reportedly already on a ventilator when she arrived at UC Davis, where they are currently being kept in isolation.

      Moving away from China, it looks like the number of new cases ex-China will once again surpass the number of mainland cases on Thursday.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      * * *

      Update (1535ET): Robert Redfield told Congress on Thursday that the CDC revised its definition for “persons under investigation”. In other words, the US is possibly taking a play out of China’s playbook to limit the numbers of people declared to be ‘under surveillance’.

      • CDC DIRECTOR REDFIELD TELLS CONGRESS THAT CDC REVISED ITS CASE DEFINITION FOR “PERSONS UNDER INVESTIGATION” FOR CORONAVIRUS

      This comes after the NYT reported earlier on Thursday that the patient in California with the case of “unknown origin” wasn’t tested for days because of restrictive federal criteria.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Photo of coronavirus testing kit

      * * *

      Update (1520ET): The Netherlands has confirmed its first case.

      * * *

      Update (1515ET): Mike Pence, the new captain of Trump’s virus-response team, said that according to the government’s “best estimate”, the virus threat remains low.

      If you keep saying it, it will come true.

      * * *

      Update (1450ET): 700 people in New York have been asked to ‘self-isolate’ for two weeks because of coronavirus fears, according to the New York State Health Department.

      Over in Italy, Angelo Borelli, the head of the Italian Civil Protection, said 650 people have now tested positive for the virus as total cases increased by roughly 50% on Thursday.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Explaining the sudden jump, Borelli blamed Lombardy for not “properly updating” the Italian Civil Protection Agency – in effect, confirming that local officials were hiding or concealing cases, whether deliberately or inadvertently.

      “The big jump from yesterday (Wednesday) is because yesterday we didn’t have the latest numbers from Lombardy,” he said.

      Some 35,000 masks have been sent to the affected areas, he added.

      * * *

      Update (1430ET): The Modesto Bee reports that UC Davis Medical Center in Sacramento, the hospital where the mysterious coronavirus patient with no link to China is being treated, has told several workers exposed to the virus to stay home and watch for symptoms.

      Below, we reported some of the comments from Gov. Newsom’s 11 am PT presser. He also insisted that the chances of an outbreak in California are “extremely low”, and that the state is not planning on making an emergency declaration.

      “Right now, I don’t think it’s necessary,” he said.

      Otherwise, the paper added, it’s just “business as usual” at the UC Davis Medial Center (we’re sure the thousands of freaked-out patients and staff would agree).

      The hospital first became entangled in the crisis after local and federal health officials confirmed that the facility on Stockton Boulevard was treating the first US case of COVID-19 from an unknown origin.

      * * *

      Update (1405ET): France has reported its 38th case, as 20 new confirmations are announced.

      • FRANCE NOW HAS 38 CONFIRMED CASES OF CORONAVIRUS – FRENCH HEALTH MINISTER

      * * *

      Update (1355ET): Norway has confirmed three more cases as the flow of coronavirus news accelerates dramatically.

      Finally, some good news on Thursday: Apple CEO Tim Cook says he believes China is getting the coronavirus outbreak under control: “It feels to me that China is getting the coronavirus under control” during interview with Fox Business Network’s Susan Li.

      * * *

      Update (1250ET): Minutes after Newsom’s disturbing confirmation, the Trump Administration, in an obvious attempt to pump the market, leaked their plans to use the ‘Defense Production Act’ to force American companies to start manufacturing protective masks and other medical supplies.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      This is critical since the supply chains across China have collapsed.

      • EXCLUSIVE-TRUMP ADMINISTRATION DISCUSSING USING DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT TO COMPEL COMPANIES TO RAMP UP MANUFACTURING OF CORONAVIRUS PROTECTIVE MASKS AND CLOTHING -OFFICIALS   

      Meanwhile, health officials have just confirmed the first case in Northern Ireland, bringing the UK total to 16.

      * * *

      Update (1345ET): As the hysteria surrounding the mysterious coronavirus case in California with no obvious connection to China mounts, California Gov. Gavin Newsom just confirmed that the state is ‘monitoring’ 8,400 people. Given the lack of context, the market is clearly assuming the worst, as stocks puke.

      He also confirmed that there are 28 people infected in the state. All told 33 people tested positive in the state, but 5 have been moved out-of-state. Whether this includes any new cases is unclear.

      Newsom assured the state that the CDC promised to speed processing of coronavirus tests.

      He also warned that the state has an “inadequate” supply of testing kits.

      “We have just a few hundred testing kits in the state of California … That is simply inadequate,” Gov. Newsom said.

      Stocks have puked, spoiling the intraday rally.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Cali’s HHS Secretary assured the public that, other than the shortage of tests, the state is ‘well-prepared’.

      “It’s natural to feel concerned about the novel coronavirus, but I want Californians to know that we have rigorously planned for this public health event,” says CA Health and Human Services Secretary Mark Ghaly.

      If Californians are freaked out, can’t say we blame them.

      * * *

      Update (1330ET): The German state of North Rhine-Westphalia has confirmed 14 new cases of the virus in the Heinsberg Area, bringing Germany’s total to 26.

      Here’s what Johns Hopkins map and register of confirmed cases looked like at 1:30ET:

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Goldman is also asking some to skip a conference over the virus, Reuters confirms.

      * * *

      Update (1315ET): Facebook is the latest major tech firm to cancel a conference or employee event. The social media giant said Thursday that it’s cancelling its annual F8 developer conference, the biggest FB event of the year, over coronavirus concerns, according to CNET.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The cancellation will be a major hit for San Jose, where the conference was scheduled to take place at the McEnery Convention Center on May 5 and 6. Last year, the event attracted more than 5,000 developers, creators and entrepreneurs from all over the world.

      Zuckerberg typically delivers a widely covered keynote speech at the conference. With all of the scrutiny the company is facing during this election season, Zuck is passing up an opportunity to potentially take a swing at his critics, or show them up.

      The company said it’s planning to bring developers together at locally hosted events, videos and live streamed content.

      * * *

      Update (1300ET): Dozens of staffers at the California Hospital – believed to be UC Davis Medical Center – who treated the coronavirus patient with the untraceable coronavirus case are reportedly being ‘monitored’ for symptoms, according to media reports.

      We suspect this is part of the CDC and Cali health authorities efforts to prevent the forewarned “community outbreak.”

      * * *

      Update (1245ET): Italian health officials have reported another three deaths in Northern Italy, bringing the death toll to 17, Reuters reports.

      • THREE FURTHER DEATHS IN CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK IN NORTHERN ITALY, BRINGING DEATH TOLL TO 17

      As one twitter user points out…

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Meanwhile, Vice President Mike Pence has added Larry Kudlow, Steve Mnuchin and Surgeon General Jerry Adams to the White House’s Coronavirus Task Force.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Notice how the press release headline includes Pence and Secretary Azar, following all the press questions about Trump being disappointed with Azar’s performance, as the former pharmaceutical lobbyist has been criticized for being unfamiliar with key details and slow on his feet during yesterdays’ Congressional subcommittee hearing.

      Also, it looks like economic concerns will be well-represented during these task force meetings.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      * * *

      Update (1220ET): An update on the case of “unknown origin” in the US, since it has caused some confusion.

      Last night, the Washington Post reported that the case was isolated in Sonoma County. The CDC later warned about the possibility of a community outbreak in the county.

      On Thursday, the CDC confirmed that the patient is from Solano County, according to local media reports and a statement from the CDC.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      * * *

      Update (1150ET): A rare glimpse of bullish economic news out of China: Starbucks says it has reopened 85% of its stores in China, its “second home market,” according to a company statement to CNBC.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      * * *

      Update (1120ET): After cheering reports of German fiscal stimulus yesterday, the ECB’s Christine Lagarde said the outbreak isn’t yet at the stage to justify ECB intervention as investors in the US, and President Trump, look to Powell for a rate cut at the next meeting.

      Of course, Lagarde is probably only saying this because she knows there’s nothing she can do to salve the European economy from a ‘supply-side’ shock, which is why she’s picking up where Mario Draghi left off and calling on EU governments to spend more to keep the Continental economy from sliding off a cliff.

      Meanwhile, Bloomberg reports that the CDC is allowing states to “modify” old test kits to use them on any suspected coronavirus patients.

      Hopefully, these tests aren’t sacrificing accuracy for availability.

      U.S. health officials will let state and local health labs modify a test for the coronavirus that has been plagued by weeks of delays because of inconclusive results, said the head of the trade group for public-health testing labs.

      Officials from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration held a conference call Wednesday in which they gave permission for state and local labs to drop a troublesome step in the tests that stopped them from being used, said Scott Becker, CEO of the Association of Public Health Laboratories. Becker’s group represents state and local testing labs.

      The change should speed testing and allow state and local labs to start using hundreds of test kits that were sent out earlier this month, rather than having to wait for an improved, new version of the test to be sent by federal health authorities.

      “In the next week we are going to have much more testing,” Becker said in a phone interview. “It is going to increase capacity across the country.”

      Source: Bloomberg

      Over on Capitol Hill, Nancy Pelosi said she spoke to Trump’s “Coronavirus Czar” Mike Pence about the emergency spending bill.

      * * *

      Update (1100ET): Azar admits that the case in a Sonoma County hospital might signal the start of “community transmission” as the CDC warned.

      • AZAR: CASE IN CALIF. COULD BE POTENTIAL FIRST COMMUNITY SPREAD

      * * *

      Update (1030ET): With US stocks deep in the red one again, HHS Secretary Alex Azar said at least 40 public health labs in the US should now be able to test for the coronavirus using “modified existing CDC kits”.

      • IMMEDIATE U.S. CORONAVIRUS RISK REMAINS LOW, AZAR SAYS
      • HHS SECRETARY AZAR SAYS AT LEAST 40 PUBLIC HEALTH LABS IN U.S. SHOULD NOW BE ABLE TO TEST FOR CORONAVIRUS USING MODIFIED EXISTING CDC KITS

      in the US, investors are worried about the first case of unknown origin, which the CDC confirmed last night. This comes as critics slam Azar for refusing to guarantee that the coronavirus vaccine would be “affordable to all”.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      The IMF said Thursday that it’s likely to downgrade its global growth outlook in the next world economic outlook, which is due in the spring.

      Switzerland has become the latest country to cancel games and events over the outbreak, with the Engadin Ski Marathon, said to be the tiny Alpine country’s largest annual sporting event.

      Over on Wall Street, US stocks are on track for their worst week since the financial crisis.

      Pakistan, meanwhile, has become the latest country to suspend all flights to Iran.

      * * *

      Update (0920ET): WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said Thursday during the organization’s daily press briefing that “we are at a decisive point” in the epidemic, while others warned it could go “in any direction.”

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Iran has confirmed 26 deaths and more than 140 cases, including a vice president who was the third senior official to catch the virus. But many fear the full extent of the outbreak is much broader. During the press conference, another WHO official singled out Iran, claiming the virus had crept into the country “undetected”, before adding that the WHO fears the outbreak inside the country is even worse than the government claims.

      “The outbreak can go in any direction based on how we handle it,” Dr. Tedros said during the group’s daily briefing in Geneva.

      Iran “has a very high clinical capacity”, said Dr. Mike Ryan, the executive director of the WHO’s health emergency program. The 10% death rate probably has more to do with the fact that many cases have gone undiagnosed, he said. The country has gone so far as to cancel Friday prayers in Tehran, after the Saudis told pilgrims they wouldn’t be allowed in to the Muslim Holy Sites.

      Following European stocks dive into correction territory, in the US, the Dow is on the cusp of falling into correction territory intraday for the first time since December 2018 (remember when?).

      As traders digest the implications of the new case in Sonoma County that could be evidence of the first case of “community transmission” in the country, as well as President Trump’s rambling press conference on Wednesday, the focus has shifted back to Europe, where in Italy, cases climbed above 500.

      According to the FT, Matteo Salvini, the leader of the League, the head of the parliamentary opposition, has met with President Sergio Mattarella as speculation mounts about the prospects for a national unity government to deal with the crisis, following several political missteps by PM Conte.

      * * *

      Update (0735ET): After yesterday’s rally fizzled, Germany is giving the ‘fiscal stimulus’ tape bomb one more go.

      • GERMAN GOVERNMENT CONSIDERING POSSIBLE STIMULUS PROGRAMME IN CASE CORONAVIRUS EPIDEMIC HITS GERMAN ECONOMY HARD – HANDELSBLATT

      Yesterday, a German lawmaker poured cold water on reports that Germany might ditch its constitutional ‘debt break’ to boost spending in response to the economy-killing outbreak.

      * * *

      Update (0715ET): with the country’s third election in a year just days away, Israel is taking serious pains to avoid acknowledging the coronavirus cases that have been confirmed in the country by blaming them on Italy and South Korea (each case involved a traveler who had recently returned from one of those two countries).

      The country said Thursday it would bar non-Israelis who had recently visited Italy after confirming that a man who had recently visited the country had tested positive for the virus, according to Reuters.

      * * *

      US equity futures are pointing to yet another lower open on Thursday morning after WaPo interrupted President Trump’s press conference last night to reports the first COVID-19 case “of unknown origin,” which the CDC later confirmed was in Sonoma County, and could be the epicenter of America’s first “community outbreak.” Shortly after, South Korea reported its largest number of new coronavirus cases in a single day, as the number of new cases reported outside China once again surpassed the number inside China. Brazil confirmed the first case in South America yesterday, bringing the virus to every continent except Antarctica.  

      A few hours later, and South Korea has reported another 171 cases, bringing the total cases confirmed on Thursday to 505 – surpassing China’s daily total (433) for the first time, as Bloomberg pointed out. So far, South Korea has confirmed 1,766 cases, along with 13 deaths, in the 38 days since the first case was reported on Jan. 20. The US and South Korea have cancelled planned military exercises after a US soldier caught the virus in Korea.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Over in Hawaii, Hawaiian Air has suspended service to South Korea starting March 2 through April 30, while Delta reduces flights as the outbreak in South Korea intensifies (Hawaii has already had one COVID-19 scare involving a Japanese tourist; we suspect the state wants to avoid a similar episode involving South Korea). Congresswoman and presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard requesting a suspension of flights from South Korea and Japan as the outbreak in the US worsens.

      Fearing the sudden breakout in the Middle East might spread inside its borders, Saudi Arabia has halted pilgrimages to Islam’s holy sites – known as the Hajj – that are a mandatory practice for Muslims, an unprecedented decision that is likely to spark controversy across the Muslim world. Across the Persian Gulf, Iran has now confirmed 26 deaths 245 cases. But given the virus’s rapid spread throughout the Islamic Republic, many suspect that the real number of cases is far higher (earlier in the week, a local lawmaker said 50 people had died in the city of Qom alone).

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Iran Health Ministry spokesman Kianoush Jahanpour said the large number of new cases is due to more labs handling virus tests. He warned that the public should expect more cases in the future.

      Yesterday, Greece was one of eight countries – Brazil, Pakistan, North Macedonia, of course Greece, Georgia, Algeria, Norway and Romania – to confirm their first cases. On Thursday, Greece confirmed two more cases, one of them in its capital city of Athens. The initial case was found in Thessaloniki, Greece’s second city.

      At last count, coronavirus has infected more than 80,000 people around the world and caused more than 2,700 deaths since the outbreak began in Wuhan back in December.

      Following Brazil’s confirmation overnight, its Latin American neighbors are taking steps to stop the virus from spreading across their borders. According to the AP, Peru is keeping a team of specialists working 24/7 at Jorge Chávez International Airport. Argentina has asked citizens to report any flu-like symptom. Puerto Rico has established a task force to prepare for an outbreak in Puerto Rico. And Chile has announced a health emergency and purchased millions of masks and protective outfits for health workers.

      But perhaps the biggest story overnight came out of Japan, where the government swore yesterday that the Tokyo Games would take place as scheduled this summer, after an IOC member speculated that if the virus wasn’t cleared up by late May, Japan might be forced to cancel the Olympics.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      PM Shinzo Abe asked all schools in Japan to remain closed until the spring holidays begin late next month to try and contain the virus. Abe’s decision follows a rash of new cases reported in the north of Japan, including the first cases in Hokkaido, with no discernible path of origin, Nikkei reports.

      As of Thursday, 175 cases have been confirmed across 19 of Japan’s prefectures, including Hokkaido, Tokyo, Aichi, and Chiba. Earlier on Thursday, Hokkaido instituted a weeklong closure of all 1,600 public elementary and junior high schools. Abe made the announcement during a meeting of the government’s headquarters.

      Schools must now decide whether to abide by the PM’s non-binding ask, though it’s expected that nearly all schools will comply.

      Chinese Premier Li Keqiang, President Xi’s ‘point-man’ in charge of the coronavirus response, said that China will extend its school closures for another month because of the virus, according to CCTV.

      Earlier this week, we noted that WHO’s team of researchers claimed they found no evidence that the virus had ‘mutated’ during their study of 100+ strains isolated from patients. Well, another group of scientists have done some research that appears to conflict with this.

      In Australia, which confirmed a handful of cases during the early days of the outbreak, but has since gone quiet, PM Scott Morrison said Thursday in what some might describe as a ‘fearmongering’ speech that “there is every indication that the world will soon enter a pandemic phase of the coronavirus.”

      “As a result, we have initiated the implementation of the coronavirus emergency response plan. While the WHO is yet to declare the nature of the coronavirus and its move toward a pandemic phase, we believe that the risk of a global pandemic is very much upon us and as a result, as a government, we need to take steps to prepare.”

      WHO’s Dr. Tedros, who yesterday asked officials not to use the word ‘pandemic’, must have been thrilled to hear Morrison’s screed.

      Morrison said Australians can still go “to the football match, or the concert” because Australia has “stayed ahead” of the virus. But now it’s time to move onto the next phase, which includes “preparation for the possibility of a much more significant event.”

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Over in France, French President Emmanuel Macron said “we have a crisis before us. An epidemic is on its way” during a visit to a Paris hospital where coronavirus patients are being treated. His statement followed reports that 2 have died in France, an elderly Christian tourist and a 60-year-old French national. The Frenchman died earlier this week in Paris at the hospital Macron visited Thursday. The total number of cases in France reached 18 on Wednesday, roughly the same number as neighboring Germany.

      Spain detected two more cases on Thursday, bringing the total this week to 14. Neither was connected to Italy, health authorities said. Switzerland confirmed 3 more cases, bringing its total to 4, though Swiss authorities said they’re testing 66 others. In Italy, the number of confirmed cases climbed to 528. Of those, 278 are self-isolating at home, 159 recovered with symptoms in hospital and 37 are in intensive care.

      As the AP reminds us, Germany’s health minister said Wednesday that the country was “at the beginning of an epidemic” as authorities in the west tested dozens of people. New cases on Thursday brought Germany’s total to 21.

      Two new cases confirmed in the UK on Thursday raised the total to 15. A primary school in Buxton was forced to close for “a deep clean” after a parent of one of the students tested positive for the virus.

      The EU Commission doubled-down on its anti-border-closure position, saying no EU country wants to close internal borders. Meanwhile, the FT reports that EU officials are weighing the risks of clusters of Italian-style outbreaks surface across the continent.

      What will it take for the EU to acknowledge that border closures might be necessary?


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 20:21

    • Whistleblower Claims 'Corrupt Cover-Up' Of Dangerous Coronavirus Quarantines
      Whistleblower Claims ‘Corrupt Cover-Up’ Of Dangerous Coronavirus Quarantines

      A complaint filed with Health and Human Services (HHS) and promptly leaked to the New York Times alleges that federal health employees interacted with Americans quarantined for possible coronavirus exposure without proper medical training or protective gear, and that health agency leaders engaged in a ‘corrupt cover-up‘ when staff members complained, according to the Times.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Filed with the Office of the Special Counsel, a whistleblower described as a ‘senior leader’ at HHS said the team was “improperly deployed” to two California military bases to assist with processing American evacuees from coronavirus hot zones in China and elsewhere.

      The staff members were sent to Travis Air Force Base and March Air Reserve Base and were ordered to enter quarantined areas, including a hangar where coronavirus evacuees were being received. They were not provided training in safety protocols until five days later, the person said.

      Without proper training or equipment, some of the exposed staff members moved freely around and off the bases, with at least one person staying in a nearby hotel and leaving California on a commercial flight. Many were unaware of the need to test their temperature three times a day. –New York Times

      I soon began to field panicked calls from my leadership team and deployed staff members expressing concerns with the lack of H.H.S. communication and coordination, staff being sent into quarantined areas without personal protective equipment, training or experience in managing public health emergencies, safety protocols and the potential danger to both themselves and members of the public they come into contact with,” reads the complaint, which HHS has acknowledged receiving.

      “We take all whistle-blower complaints very seriously and are providing the complainant all appropriate protections under the Whistleblower Protection Act,” said deputy assistant secretary Caitlin B. Oakley, who is also the department’s national spokeswoman for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Public Affairs. “We are evaluating the complaint and have nothing further to add at this time.”

      The Times notes that the complaint comes right after President Trump began to downplay the risks of coronavirus on US soil “amid bipartisan concern about a sluggish and disjointed response by the administration to an illness that public health officials have said is likely to spread through the United States.”

      In other words, the coronavirus response officially an election issue now.

      The whistle-blower’s account raised questions about whether the Trump administration has taken adequate precautions in its handling of the virus to date, and whether Mr. Trump’s minimization of the risks has been mirrored by other top officials when confronted with potentially disturbing developments. –New York Times

      The first American case of coronavirus emerged neary Travis Air Force Base this week in an American patient with no known contact with hot zones or other coronavirus patients.

      The Times also reports that similar incidents ‘appear to have happened elsewhere,’ pointing to HHS employees were also dispatched to Marine Corps Air Station Miramar to help evacuees from Wuhan, China “someone with direct knowledge of the effort” leaked.

      The levels of protection varied even while he was at Miramar, he said. Standards were more lax at first, but once people arrived who appeared to be sick, workers began donning personal protective equipment. He is now back at work, and has yet to be tested for coronavirus exposure.

      In the complaint, the whistle-blower painted a grim portrait of agency staff members who found themselves on the front lines of a frantic federal effort to confront the coronavirus in the United States without any preparation or training, and whose own health concerns were dismissed by senior administration officials as detrimental to staff “morale.” They were “admonished,” the complaint said, and “accused of not being team players,” and had their “mental health and emotional stability questioned.”

      After a phone call with health agency leaders to raise their fears about exposure to the virus, the staff members described a “whitewashing” of the situation, characterizing the response as “corrupt” and a “cover-up,” according to the complaint, and telling the whistle-blower that senior officials had treated them as a “nuisance” and did not want to hear their worries about health and safety. New York Times

      California Democratic Rep. Jimmy Gomez, whose office received the complaint, appeared to reference it during a Thursday morning hearing with HHS secretary Alex M. Azar in the House Ways and Means Committee. Gomez was contacted by the whistleblower, who he had met before entering Congress, due in part because his committee has jurisdiction over HHS.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-CA)

      “To your knowledge, were any of the ACF employees exposed to high-risk evacuees from China?” Gomez asked Azar during a tense exchange.

      “They should never have been, without appropriate PPE,” Azar responded – referring to ‘personal protective equipment’ used to protect workers from disease. “If you were anyone in quarantine, to maintain quarantine, that should be the case.”

      Gomez claimed that the teams sent to March and Travis air bases dealt with a “chaotic” situation.

      “I would not accept your proposition that it was chaotic at all times,” Azar responded. “I am not aware of any violation of quarantine or isolation protocols.”

      “Do you think that breaking basic protocols and exposing untrained human service employees to the coronavirus before allowing them to be dispersed around the country could have endangered the employees and other Americans?” Gomez asked.

      “I don’t believe that has taken place,” replied Azar.

      The complaint, which was reported by The Washington Post, surfaced the day after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed the first known instance of a person testing positive without exposure to anyone known to be infected with the coronavirus, also known as Covid-19, or recent travels to any of the countries where it is circulating. The C.D.C. said that it was possible the patient, who is a resident of Solano County, Calif. — home to Travis Air Force Base — could have been exposed to a returning traveler who was infected.

      March Air Reserve Base in Riverside, Calif., housed 195 people evacuated from Wuhan, China, for 14 days beginning in late January, while Travis in Northern California has housed a number of quarantined people in recent weeks, including some of the approximately 400 Americans on the Diamond Princess cruise ship that had docked in Japan. –New York Times

      The whistleblower claims that the staff members, who had some experience with emergency management, were not properly prepared for the task at hand.

      “They were not properly trained or equipped to operate in a public health emergency situation,” wrote the official. “They were potentially exposed to coronavirus; appropriate measures were not taken to protect the staff from potential infection; and appropriate steps were not taken to quarantine, monitor or test them during their deployment and upon their return home.”


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 20:05

    • Is The Coronavirus Pandemic About To Become Another Spanish Flu
      Is The Coronavirus Pandemic About To Become Another Spanish Flu

      Authored by Michael Every of Rabobank

      COVID-19 vs The Spanish Flu

      Summary

      • In light of the recent outbreak in Europe, it appears a question of when –rather than whether– the COVID-19 epidemic will be declared a global pandemic
      • Countermeasures such as quarantine or travel bans remain necessary to contain the virus’ spread. This will continue to cause disruption, as policy makers chase a moving target
      • There is an increasing interest in the 1918-19 Spanish flu, and there are indeed some similarities in terms of virulence, infectiousness, and the potential attack rate.
      • Anecdotal evidence suggests a similar economic impact both despite and because of changes in society.
      • The key lesson from COVID-19 is the same as with the financial sector: complex interconnected systems greatly increase underlying risks, which are multiplicative and exponential, rather than additive and linear.

      Chasing a moving target

      Since the middle of January, the number-one worry for businesses, policy makers and market participants has been the outbreak of a new coronavirus known as COVID-19. In an effort to gauge its potential impact, analysts initially resorted to comparisons with the outbreak of SARS and MERS, two previous diseases resulting from coronaviruses. But we are now already way past this. It appears a question of when –rather than whether– this epidemic will be declared a global pandemic.

      This is why there has been an increase in interest in previous pandemics. In particular, we have noticed a lot of comparisons with the ‘Spanish flu’, which originated in the final year of the First World War, spread rapidly, and resulted in an estimated 50-100 million deaths worldwide. So far, COVID-19 has led to more than 80,000 illnesses and 2,700 deaths, predominantly in China’s Hubei province, but more recently also in places such as South Korea, Iran, and Italy.

      At the same time, we have also heard plenty of comparisons with another viral epidemic: the seasonal flu. In the US alone, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that so far this season there have been at least 26 million flu illnesses, 250,000 hospitalizations and 14,000 deaths. It is then argued that COVID-19 isn’t much of a big deal compared with seasonal flu, and that ‘business as usual’-conditions should return as soon as possible.

      This is too complacent. Virologists have studied seasonal flu for decades. Despite the high number of illnesses, we generally have a good idea on what to expect. As the Northern Hemisphere moves towards spring, it is certain that flu cases will go down. In contrast, very little is known about COVID-19. Its basic reproduction number is also unknown, but the explosive rise in cases signal that it’s significantly higher than 1. Therefore, countermeasures such as quarantine or travel bans remain necessary to contain the virus’ spread.

      The philosopher Søren Kierkegaard once wrote that “life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards”. Indeed, COVID-19 appears to be a wild card in terms of how far it will spread, how many deaths it will cause, and how severe the demand and supply shock is going to be. Let’s find out whether the Spanish flu could provide us with some pointers.

      La gripe Española

      The Spanish flu was a strain of avian influenza. Starting in late 1917, the virus spread across Europe, North America and Asia. Initially, it resembled seasonal flu, and those most at risk were the sick and the elderly. But around August 1918, the virus mutated to a much deadlier form, and deaths peaked between September and November 1918, eventually culminating in an estimated 500 million infections and 50-100 million fatalities. The Spanish flu is therefore the deadliest pandemic in human history, claiming many more lives than the First World War itself.

      Whereas infectious diseases prior to the Spanish flu had mostly spread along trade routes (the 14th century Black Death is a good example of how intensified contact along dense networks increases a disease’s potential), the global context of the First World War appeared to enable the great spread of this flu. There was a lot of movement and interaction between people –with and without guns– and transmission was facilitated by extremely poor sanitary and health conditions.

      The pandemic occurred in three waves with different characteristics. The first originated in early March 1918, and was a relatively mild one. The second wave was extremely deadly and came in the autumn of 1918. The third and final wave took place in the winter of 1919. Virologists have proposed several mechanisms to explain why this flu came in waves, including viral evolution (e.g. mutations), environmental changes (e.g. the weather) and behavioral changes in response to the pandemic (e.g. containment efforts), but there appears no real consensus of the interactions of these factors. This is partially due to data limitations and a lack of expertise at that time.

      It has also been hypothesized that the unique circumstances of the First World War altered the virus’s natural selection process. Typically, the dangerous strains make their hosts very sick, who then recognize their symptoms relatively easily and move either into quarantine or pass away rapidly. These strains tend to die out relatively quickly – even if it is with their hosts, in the case of Ebola, for example. Milder strains, on the other hand, make people only mildly ill. Their hosts will have a stronger tendency to remain active in public life, and to expose others with these milder strains. One benefit of this is that it (partially) improves immunity to the more aggressive strains. In the First World War, however, very sick soldiers were sent on very crowded trains to even more overcrowded field hospitals, while the mildly ill remained at the front. This eventually helped spread deadlier strains in the second half of 1918, wreaking havoc in those parts of the world were the milder strains hadn’t presented themselves yet.

      Comparisons with COVID-19

      A rather similar epidemic?

      As it stands now, COVID-19 seems to be a virus with relatively modest virulence: the case fatality rate being estimated to be around 2%, much lower than SARS or MERS. However, it has relatively high infectiousness. with the initial estimates of R0 –the basic reproduction number– are around 2.5. Simply put, this means that each case can generate 2.5 other cases. This may change over time, as people adjust their behavior, yet the relatively long incubation period for COVID-19 (perhaps up to 27 days) ensures that people can carry and transmit the virus without showing any symptoms.

      The Spanish flu had a case-fatality rate of more than 2.5%, although estimates vary, and a reproduction number in the range of 2.0–3.0 in cities (which is what we should look at now, given the population shift from rural areas to urban areas). In other words, if countermeasures are as ineffective in containing the virus as they were in 1918-1919, when they were arguably non-existent, it could be argued that the current virus has a potential attack rate of 60-80%. We can therefore learn from the Spanish flu that as long as this virus remains transmissible but relatively mild, it has the potential to spread rapidly around the world. This pessimistic theoretical approach has been backed up by the Harvard University epidemiologist Marc Lipsitch.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      What’s in a name? The rose still stinks regardless

      The origins of the Spanish flu remain shrouded in mystery, even though it is generally accepted that there was very little Spanish about it. Instead, Spain was a neutral country in the war and the freedom of its press was greater than in the warring nations. As a consequence, there were lots of reports about the virus’ devastating effects in Spain, while in most other European countries any information that was likely to impact morale or indicate weakness was strongly censored.

      We can draw a parallel here. Even though China has now taken extreme precautionary measures to limit the spread of COVID-19, they were rather late in their response. The authorities have also acknowledged this recently. But as the Chinese government continues to control the flow of information it is likely that a wide distrust in the officially published data on cases and fatalities will remain. The same holds true in Iran, for example, while many other countries, even the US, are not really testing their populations to any real extent: no tests means no cases – but it does not mean no virus is present.

      But does that still matter at this point? While the lack of good and timely information potentially contributed to the initial spread of the virus, the genie is now out of the bottle. Moreover, whether the virus is or is not present does not seem to be altering the pattern of public behavior much. With full transparency of the risks people generally go into panic-buying mode and then into a voluntary lockdown almost as aggressively as they do under a state-imposed quarantine: for example, Chinese restaurants are deserted, even in areas of countries with no reported virus links.

      The public reaction in some countries to date already seems to echo the panic seen in 1918-19.

      Not W-shaped, but J-shaped

      The curve of influenza deaths by age has historically been U-shaped, but the Spanish flu had a W-shaped curve. It was extremely deadly for those in the 19-40 age cohort, who are usually least vulnerable to viruses. This is in stark contrast to the mortality rates for COVID-19, which seems to have the worst impact on those aged over 65 and/or with co-morbidity factors such as diabetes, lung and/or heart conditions. This would then be a J-shaped curve.

      The figures below are based on a study that examined data from 72,314 patients and was carried out by a group of experts at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. This would seem to argue for COVID-19 to present a much less significant threat to the global economy than its predecessor a century ago. However, we would argue that this overlooks some mitigating factors.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Notably, the population profile of developed countries today, where the most economic damage could be done, skews significantly higher than it did back in 1918-19 in its own J-shape. This means that while younger people have less to worry about with COVID-19 than with Spanish flu, there are more of those who are potentially most vulnerable to the current virus. For example, the average life expectancy in the US was around 56 years in 1919, well below the 65+ band where COVID-19 seems to do the most damage today. Moreover, more than 16% of the US is aged over 65, and so most at risk from the virus, and that rises to 27% in Japan, 23% in Italy, 22% in Portugal, 21% in Germany, and 20% in France.

      Second, although healthcare today is vastly superior to that of the early 20th century in almost all locations, which is a huge comfort, it is also much more expensive than the relatively simple treatments available in 1918-19, and hence more rationed. While a fully-equipped ICU may ensure a better and faster recovery from a virus, how many ICU beds would be available to patients if the elderly demographic were to fall victim to COVID-19 en masse in each country? They would be overwhelmed, as we already see from normal seasonal flu epidemics in the UK, and currently in China, a country which despite aging rapidly still only has around 12% of its citizens aged over 65. Meanwhile, in emerging economies with a much younger demographic, which is a positive, the public healthcare systems are generally far weaker and less prepared, meaning that the virus can again potentially still wreak havoc.

      In short, COVID-19 could still potentially compare with the Spanish flu – in a worst-case scenario.

      Fear and trembling, indeed

      From a purely economic perspective, there isn’t a lot of data which we can use to examine the impact of the Spanish flu with any sort of precision given the absence of detailed national accounts data in most countries. Clearly, however, 1918-19 was a totally different structure for a virus to hit. Agriculture still accounted for a far larger share of GDP than today, and rural economies were still relatively more important: in those areas, the virus spread less rapidly due to lower population density.

      By contrast, the bulk of today’s economy is about the urban environment and services, the former the prime environment for virus transmission. Moreover, both cities and services are hit hardest by any virus lockdown, making the modern economy arguably even more susceptible than in 1918-19 despite our advances in technology and communications. For example, a 2009 UK study found that even in a mild pandemic scenario the economic cost would be 0.5-1.0% of GDP, rising to 4.3% of GDP, and potentially even higher, in the case of a severe “high fatality” scenario. (Please see our recent special report on the potential global economic impact of the virus.)

      Clearly, however, there are already some worrying parallels between Spanish flu and COVID-19. For example, this paper published by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis contains some anecdotes that any person who reads today’s business news might very well recognize. We’ve picked just three:

      1. “Merchants in Little Rock, Arkansas say their business has declined 40%. Others estimate the decrease at 70%.”
      2. “The only business in Little Rock in which there has been an increase in activity is the drug store.”
      3. “Physicians report they are kept too busy combating the disease to report the number of their patients and have little time to devote to other matters.”

      More broadly, the authors also surveyed economic research and conclude that most of the evidence indicates that the effects of the 1918-19 pandemic were short-term. Then again, there was a lot of euphoric post-war reconstruction that needed to be done in 1919 in Europe at least, which flowed through to the US economy to some extent. Today’s businesses seem to find it hard to locate profitable investment opportunities despite ultra-low rates, and a further sharp drop in global demand is all that they need.

      The Fed also found that back in 1918-19 “a decrease in the supply of manufacturing workers that resulted from influenza mortalities would have had the initial effect of reducing manufacturing labor supply, increasing the marginal product of labor and capital per worker, and thus increasing real wages”. Yet another study on the impact of the 1918 pandemic on Swedish economic performance found robust evidence that “the influenza had no discernible effect on earnings” but that it instead led to “a significant increase in poverty rates” – obviously as the state played a much smaller counter-cyclical role in 1919 than it does in 2020.

      In today’s economic environment, where wage growth has proved almost universally sticky to the downside, we find it very hard to believe that COVID-19 will lead to an increase in real wages – at least near term. Rather, for developed economies with ever more ‘gig’ workers and self-employed, even in developed economies, an increase in poverty appears far more likely, ceteris paribus.
      In short, the 1918-19 Spanish Flu massively disrupted a global economy already shattered by the First World War (1914-18). COVID-19, while so far much less virulent in some key respects, also looks potentially able to do a huge amount of damage to a modern global economy with its own pre-existing health conditions.

      ‘Stating’ the obvious

      However, unlike in 1918-19, the state will almost certainly step in: populations, and markets, will demand it. Fiscal spending will accelerate hugely, with little concern over deficits, just as would be the case in a war. Even traditionally-prudent Hong Kong, hard hit by both political unrest and now COVID-19, has just announced a HKD10,000 (USD1,274) fiscal transfer for each adult permanent resident to try to jump-start the economy. Yet can a virus-hit emerging market do the same? That seems highly unlikely. Indeed, some emerging markets are incapable of testing for COVID-19 and others are charging for doing so (and for treating it), which ensures the poor will try to avoid reporting any illness. As such, the virus could have a ‘home base’ to linger in and spread from.

      Even in richer economies physical bottle-necks, e.g., ICU beds, would remain for a long time. No other country can build a new hospital in just a few days as China just has (though the finished product is of questionable quality according to some reports). Imagine a global pandemic with a shortage of key inputs, such as masks: even China, the world’s workshop, experienced this recently. In the worst case we would see shortages of masks, and drugs, and beds, and nurses and doctors. Naturally, the public cry for wider and better healthcare would grow the deeper COVID-19 bites. As such, the potential flow-on effects from a worst-case virus scenario may be as socio-economically substantial as the revolutionary European social reforms that followed the end of World War 1.

      Conclusion: just a passing fever?

      Indeed, having considered “sick-stemic risk” stemming from COVID-19, we also need to consider the following: against a political tailwind blowing towards right-wing populism anyway, as explored in last year’s The Age of Rage; with businesses already rethinking their global strategies in the wake of the US-China trade war; and with a health-scare now seeing voters panic and look for answers, will we see a more pronounced shift towards anti-globalization movements in the wake of the virus?

      The prevailing political trend of “national security” will likely also come into play: “How can it be,” populations will ask, “that we have no local production of virus masks, or drugs? Surely we need to keep them for ourselves first! Why are we allowing foreigners in when they might be infected? Let’s prioritize health and not markets!”

      Deglobalization will arguably accelerate – and that is before we address the issue of how states will be able to pay for the higher healthcare spending that populations will demand, which does not sit alongside a small-government, free-trade globalization that we have grown accustomed to.

      For now we can see that in the short-term there will undoubtedly be far less global travel and much less trade: we already see that. In the long-term it all depends on how COVID-19 plays out.

      If it passes quickly, then just as in 2008-09 the key structural lessons on systemic risk of globalization will arguably be ignored in favour of the obvious near-term benefits, while lip-service is paid to the risks in public. However, should COVID-19 spread and linger, meaning that each new journey, each new encounter means a risk of infection with a 1 in 5 chance of serious illness and a 1 in 50 chance of death (based on data so far), then things may change very significantly on many socio-economic fronts. After all, the word “quarantine” emerged from the established practice in Venice of holding visiting sailors off its coast for 40 days to ensure they did not carry any disease.

      To repeat, the lessons of COVID-19 are far older than the century-old Spanish flu: complex interconnected systems may produce what look like superior outcomes/returns in the short-term, but they also greatly increase underlying risks that will eventually emerge at far greater cost. These are multiplicative and exponential rather than additive and linear. Markets still aren’t pricing such outcomes, even after the recent equity sell-off.

      Let’s conclude with Søren Kierkegaard again: his seminal work was titled “Fear and Trembling”, which seems appropriate enough today looking at COVID-19 vs. Spanish flu. However, he also argues for a leap of faith and states that “Hope is a passion for the possible.” Indeed.


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 19:45

    • Why Is Tesla Quietly Moving Crates & Loaded Pallets Out Of Gigafactory 2?
      Why Is Tesla Quietly Moving Crates & Loaded Pallets Out Of Gigafactory 2?

      WGRZ Buffalo reported Tesla is “quietly” moving “a large number of crates and loaded pallets” out of its taxpayer-funded factory in Buffalo, New York.

      This comes one day after we reported Tesla ended its partnership with Panasonic to produce solar panels at the factory, also known as Gigafatory 2.

      Panasonic is expected to stop production in May and be completely moved out of the factory by September.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      As we noted, Tesla continues “continues to lie tell NY state officials that it’s going to continue to produce its solar roof in Buffalo and that the company is exceeding its required job counts by the state, which was a condition of the deal for the company to receive an insane $959 million in taxpayer money to build its factory.”

      WGRZ said the crates and loaded pallets are being hauled to a warehouse in Wheatfield Business Park, once the home to Bell Aerospace.

      Tesla’s landlord at Gigafatory 2 is the state of New York, also known as Empire State Development (ESD). Tesla famously started operations at Buffalo in 2018 after getting a sweetheart deal to lease the facility from ESD for $1 per year and pledged to commit $5 billion in investments. Tesla faces a monster $41.2 million fine if it doesn’t keep operations open or have a headcount above 1,500.

      Reuters and Bloomberg both reported in 2018 that crates and pallets of machinery were sitting in the factory. WGRZ provided no further details of what exactly was shipped out.

      Considering the events this week, it couldn’t get any worse for Tesla – it remains to be seen if Gigafatory 2 will still be operating in the quarters ahead. Maybe ESD is about to evict Musk?…


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 19:25

    • Anonymous Sources & Iraq War Enablers Are Now Claiming The Kremlin Is At It Again
      Anonymous Sources & Iraq War Enablers Are Now Claiming The Kremlin Is At It Again

      Authored by Philip Giraldi via The Strategic Culture Foundation,

      Those hapless individuals who run the United States are again slipping into a fantasy world where Americans are besieged by imaginary threats coming from both inside and outside the country. Of course, it is particularly convenient to warn of foreign threats, as it makes the people in government seem relevant and needed, but one might recommend that the tune be changed as it is getting a bit boring. After all, there are only so many hours in the day and Russian President Vladimir Putin must pause occasionally to eat or sleep, so the plotting to destroy American democracy must be on hold at least some of the time.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Yes, anonymous sources and the guys and gals who made the Iraq war a reality are now claiming that the Kremlin is at it again! Hints over the past year that Putin might try to replay 2016 in 2020 only do it better this time have now been confirmed! Per one news report the enemy is already at the gates: “U.S. intelligence officials told lawmakers last week that Russia is interfering in the 2020 election campaign by aiming to cast doubt on the integrity of the vote and boost President Donald Trump’s re-election.”

      And there’s more! In a New York Times article headlined “Same Goal, Different Playbook: Why Russia Would Support Trump and Sanders: Vladimir Putin is eager both to take the sheen off U.S. democracy and for a counterpart who is less likely to challenge his territorial and nuclear ambitions,” it was revealed that the Kremlin is intending to also help Bernie Sanders, so whichever way the election goes they win.

      According to the Times Bernie has been “warn[ed]… of evidence that he is the Russian president’s favorite Democrat.” The article then goes on to explain, relying on its anonymous sources, that “…to the intelligence analysts and outside experts who have spent the past three years dissecting Russian motives in the 2016 election, and who tried to limit the effect of Moscow’s meddling in the 2018 midterms, what is unfolding in 2020 makes perfect sense. Mr. Trump and Mr. Sanders represent the most divergent ends of their respective parties, and both are backed by supporters known more for their passion than their policy rigor, which makes them ripe for exploitation by Russian trolls, disinformation specialists and hackers for hire seeking to widen divisions in American society.”

      The Times article was written by David Sanger, the paper’s venerable national security correspondent. He is reliably wedded to Establishment views of the Russian threat, as is his newspaper, and strikes rock bottom in his assessment when he cites none other than “Victoria Nuland, who in a long diplomatic career had served both Republican and Democratic administrations, and had her phone calls intercepted and broadcast by Russian intelligence services.” Nuland, clearly the victim of a nefarious Russian intelligence operation that recorded her saying “fuck the EU,” opined that “Any figures that radicalize politics and do harm to center views and unity in the United States are good for Putin’s Russia.” Nuland is perhaps best known for her role in spending $5 billion in U.S. taxpayer money to overthrow the legitimate government of Ukraine. She is married to leading neoconservative Robert Kagan, which Sanger fails to mention, and is currently a nonresident fellow at the liberal interventionist Brookings Institution. She also works at former Clinton Secretary of State Madeleine Albright’s consultancy, presumably for the Benjamins. Albright, one might recall, thought that killing 500,000 Iraqi children through U.S. sanctions was “worth it.”

      Given the fact that Russia will have very limited resources in their effort to corrupt American democracy, which is, by the way, doing a very good job of self-destruction without any outside help, how exactly will they do it? Sanger explains:

      “As they focus on evading more vigilant government agencies and technology companies trying to identify and counter malicious online activity, the Russians are boring into Iranian cyberoffense units, apparently so that they can initiate attacks that look as if they originate in Iran — which itself has shown interest in messing with the American electoral process… And, in one of the most effective twists, they are feeding disinformation to unsuspecting Americans on Facebook and other social media. By seeding conspiracy theories and baseless claims on the platforms, Russians hope everyday Americans will retransmit those falsehoods from their own accounts. That is an attempt to elude Facebook’s efforts to remove disinformation, which it can do more easily when it flags ‘inauthentic activity,’ like Russians posing as Americans. It is much harder to ban the words of real Americans, who may be parroting a Russian story line, even unintentionally.”

      So those wily Russians are making themselves look like Iranians and they are planning on “feeding disinformation” to “unsuspecting Americans” consisting of “conspiracy theories” and “baseless claims.” Sounds like a plan to me as the various occupants of the White House and Congress have been doing exactly that for the past twenty years. That we had a national election in 2016 in which a reality television personality ran against an unindicted criminal would seem to indicate that the effort to brainwash the American people has already been successful.

      The usual bottom feeders are also piling on to the Russian interference story. Jane Harman, former congresswoman who once colluded with Israeli intelligence to lobby the Department of Justice to drop criminal charges against two employees of AIPAC in exchange for Israel’s support to make her chair of the House Intelligence Committee, warns “How dangerous it would be if we lose the tip of the spear against those who would destroy us.”

      Former CIA Director John Brennan also has something to say. He is “very disturbed” by his conviction that Russia is actively meddling in the 2020 campaign in support of President Trump. He said “We are now in a full-blown national security crisis. By trying to prevent the flow of intelligence to Congress, Trump is abetting a Russian covert operation to keep him in office for Moscow’s interests, not America’s.” Brennan is best known for having orchestrated the illegal campaign to vilify Trump and his associates prior to, during and after the 2016 election. He also participated in a weekly meeting with Barack Obama where he and the president would add and remove names from a “kill list” of U.S. citizens residing overseas. He and his boss should both be in prison, but they are instead fêted as American patriots. Go figure.

      Time to take a step back from the developing panic. As usual, the U.S. government intelligence agencies have produced no actual evidence that Moscow is up to anything, and there are already reports that the Office of National Intelligence briefer “overstated” her case against the Kremlin in her briefing of the House Intelligence Committee. Sure, the Russians have an interest in an American election and will favor candidates like Trump and Sanders that are not outright hostile to them, but to claim as the NY Times does that Russia has incompatible “territorial and nuclear interests” is a stretch. And yes, Moscow will definitely use its available intelligence resources to monitor the nomination and election process while also clandestinely doing what it can to improve the chances of those individuals they approve of. That is what intelligence agencies do.

      In American Establishment groupthink there is one standard for what Washington does and quite a different standard for everyone else. Does it shock any American to know that the United States has interfered in scores of elections all over the world ever since the Second World War, to include those in places like France and Italy well into the 1980s? And in somewhat more kinetic covert actions, actually removing Mohammed Mossadeq in Iran, Salvador Allende in Chile, Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala and Mohamed Morsi in Egypt just for starters, not even considering the multiple plots to kill Fidel Castro. And it continues to do so today openly in places like Iran and Venezuela while also claiming hypocritically that the U.S. is “exceptional” and also a “force for good.” That anyone should be genuinely worrying about Russian proxies buying and distributing a couple of hundred thousands of dollars’ worth of ads in an election in which many billions of dollars’ worth of propaganda will be on the table is ridiculous.

      It is time to stop blaming Russia for the failure of America’s ruling class to provide an honest and accountable government and one that does not go around the world looking for trouble.

      That is what the 2020 election should really be all about.


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 19:05

    Digest powered by RSS Digest

    Today’s News 27th February 2020

    • Sweden's Victimized Children
      Sweden’s Victimized Children

      Authored by Judith Bergman via The Gatestone Institute,

      The number of children who rob other children has increased by 100% in only four years, according to a new study by Swedish police about reported violent crimes in which children under the age of 15 are both the victims and the perpetrators.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      In 2016, there were 1,178 robberies against children under 18 years of age. In 2019, the number had increased to 2,484. The number of violent crimes where the suspect is a child under 15 years of age has also gone up dramatically: In 2015, there were 6,359 reported violent crimes where the suspect was a child under 15. In 2019, that number had increased to 8,719 reported violent crimes.

      The crimes involve “Violence to the head, kicks, gun threats, burning with lighters, threats to kill, threats to bomb the school, stabbings with food knives, bites and children who have been scratched, dragged, thrown and locked up by other children”.

      The lowest age of a suspected perpetrator was seven. There has also been an increasing number of girl gangs. One girl was violently assaulted by a gang of five girls who kicked her, beat her and spat at her. The girl said she thought she was going to die.

      “It’s ordinary children who are robbed on their way to and from school, they are called ‘whore’ and told that they’re going to get a Glock in the mouth. I think we are letting the kids down”said regional police chief Carin Götblad.

      Crimes committed by children under 15 years of age are not investigated by the police; they are left to the social workers. “When we get [such cases], we send [them] to [the social workers] and then it goes a little under the radar. This is not something we have discussed before,” said Götblad, who criticized municipalities for not taking crimes committed by children seriously enough.

      “I think there is an inherent reflex to ignore it because it’s not very nice, but then we who are professionals need to look at this in particular and raise awareness. I am terribly worried about all vulnerable victims of crime,” Götblad said.

      “The suspects are also victims in some sense, but this is still something we have to deal with, that children also commit crimes”.

      According to Götblad, parents are afraid to report the crimes committed by other children against their children.

      “Parents are afraid of threats and harassment of their children”, said Götblad. “It’s really important to report, [but] at the same time I can’t say I don’t understand their fear”.

      The parents may not only be motivated by fear, but by an unwillingness — or inability — of Swedish authorities to help them and ensure the safety of their children — a basic duty of authorities everywhere.

      In August 2019, 13-year-old Filip and his family had no other choice than to move from the city of Uppsala after a gang of minors made his life there unbearable. He was abused, robbed and his life was threatened by gangs, with Swedish authorities telling him not to report it to the police as this would make things “worse” for him. The police even told the family that moving was their best option.

      When authorities fail to honor their responsibilities, lawlessness results. This is visible in all of Swedish society, not only with respect to children.

      Recently, children found explosive material hidden in a sandbox in the Sorgenfri elementary school in the city of Malmö, according to Sveriges Radio. It is still unclear who put them there.

      Last year there were 257 reports of explosions — including attempted explosions — an increase of 59% compared to 2018, according to SVT Nyheter. Yet, only seven people have been convicted for any of those 257 crimes. In 2020, at least 10 explosions have already taken place.

      In addition to the rise in crimes against children and the rise in explosions, the number of reported rapes against women also increased by 10% in 2019, compared to the previous year, with a total of 4,670 reported rapes. The number of reported rapes against men has also soared by 35% to 260 reported cases. Reported rapes against children remained unchanged at around 3,400.

      As previously noted by Gatestone Institute, this summer, a private foundation, Det Goda Samhället (“The Good Society”) published a report based on statistics from Swedish authorities. The report showed:

      “For the first time now, more crimes – in absolute terms – are committed by persons of foreign background than by persons of Swedish origin…

      The most crime-prone population subgroup are people born [in Sweden] to two foreign-born parents”.

      According to Prime Minister Stefan Löfven, however, Sweden’s problems with gang violence would supposedly have been the same without immigration. When asked in November 2019 about the links between mass immigration and gang violence, Löfven refused any connection, while indirectly acknowledging, in a somewhat self-contradictory manner, that gang violence is an imported problem:

      We didn’t use to have this kind of [gang] violence then but now we have it… The segregation is because there is too low employment and too high unemployment in these areas. But that would have been the same regardless of who had lived there. If you would put people born in Sweden in the same conditions, you would get the same result.”


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 02:00

    • "It's Crazy" – Pandemic Potential Crushes 'Chinatowns' Worldwide
      “It’s Crazy” – Pandemic Potential Crushes ‘Chinatowns’ Worldwide

      Discrimination against China and Chinese people have erupted since the Covid-19 outbreak in January. Anxieties are high as many are avoiding Chinatowns across the world for fear, they might contract the deadly virus.

      From Australia to New York City to Toronto to England to San Francisco, Chinatowns in many regions of the world have transformed into ghost towns. We noted this phenomenon last week. 

      Lily Zhou, 39, who owns a Shanghai-style restaurant in Australia’s Chinatown, told Bloomberg her food sales had crashed 70% since late January, which is around the time the virus started making headlines. She said her operation can withstand another few months of low traffic, and then after that, she would have to close down. 

      At 99 Favor Taste in Manhattan, store manager Echo Wu said traffic volume has plunged by a third since the virus started making headlines. Wu said depressed sales could begin impacting the long-term outlook for the restaurant. He believes people are irrational, and the media has drummed up Sinophobia.

      “They may have a bias toward Chinese restaurants now,” He said. “I hope people can be more reasonable. After all, there are no cases in town yet.”

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      The Rol San Restaurant in Toronto’s Chinatown has seen sales slump by at least 30% in the last month. Bloomberg asked the manager if the virus is driving Sinophobia, he replied: “Of course.”

      Other restaurants in Toronto’s Chinatown have experienced a slowdown in patrons. Streets are bare, and a nearby supermarket to Rol San has seen traffic halved since the end of last month. 

      Chinatown in Manchester, England, has seen a 40% decline in its customer base, many of which are Chinese students. “There are fewer visitors, fewer customers. They’re really, really suffering — at the moment we haven’t come up with any solution yet,” Raymond Chan of the local business association said. 

      As for the oldest and most established Chinatowns in the US, which is in San Francisco, the streets are deserted as people avoid the area for fear of contracting the virus. Henry Chen, 56, owner of the AA Bakery & Cafe on Stockton Street, said his business fell 30% since the virus outbreak in China and confirmed US cases started to tick higher earlier this month. “There are fewer people on the street,” he said. “Lunch, dinner, breakfast, there is no business.”

      The plunge in traffic to Western Chinatowns is nothing compared to paralysis that has developed in China’s economy. More than 700 million people are in lockdown in dozens of towns, manufacturing hubs are shuttered, and retail stores remain closed. 

      However, in Sydney’s Lower North Shore, and Eastwood in the north-west, which has a sizeable Chinese population, stores are thriving and selling out of face masks. 

      “It is crazy!” the Phoenix health and beauty store assistant manager Ruby Han told Bloomberg, referring to the demand for virus masks, hand sanitizers, and alcohol swabs.

      “It’s like every 10 minutes people will come to check — ‘Do you have some masks? Do you have some masks?'” she said. “To be honest, we can’t handle it because the demand is just too high.”

      We noted last month that worldwide searches for ‘virus mask’ erupted. Then detailed how a global run on masks was starting. 

      AuMake International Ltd. said online sales for masks have exploded: “This is a once in a decade, or two decades, event,” said Executive Chairman Keong Chan. “We know with Chinese New Year, we anticipate a fairly decent amount of sales, and it is way more than that. I can only conclude that the virus is a huge part of that.”

      The same is being said at a pharmacy inside the Dragon City Mall in Toronto: “We probably used to sell about 100 masks a week, now we sell north of 700” despite lower foot traffic, said pharmacist Timothy Tran, 57.

      With the virus not yet under control, restaurant owners in many Chinatowns across the world could soon shutter their doors as Sinophobia fears have resulted in plunging sales. 


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 01:00

    • The Looming Financial Nightmare: So Much For Living The American Dream
      The Looming Financial Nightmare: So Much For Living The American Dream

      Authored by John Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute,

      “When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.

      – Frédéric Bastiat, French economist

      Let’s talk numbers, shall we?

      The national debt (the amount the federal government has borrowed over the years and must pay back) is $23 trillion and growing.

      The amount this country owes is now greater than its gross national product (all the products and services produced in one year by labor and property supplied by the citizens). We’re paying more than $270 billion just in interest on that public debt annually. And the top two foreign countries who “own” our debt are China and Japan.

      The national deficit (the difference between what the government spends and the revenue it takes in) is projected to surpass $1 trillion every year for the next 10 years.

      The United States spends more on foreign aid than any other nation ($50 billion in 2017 alone). More than 150 countries around the world receive U.S. taxpayer-funded assistance, with most of the funds going to the Middle East, Africa and Asia.

      Meanwhile, almost 60% of Americans are so financially strapped that they don’t have even $500 in savings and nothing whatsoever put away for retirement, and yet they are being forced to pay for government programs that do little to enhance or advance their lives.

      Folks, if you haven’t figured it out yet, we’re not living the American dream.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      We’re living a financial nightmare.

      The U.S. government—and that includes the current administration—is spending money it doesn’t have on programs it can’t afford, and “we the taxpayers” are the ones who will pay for it.

      As financial analyst Kristin Tate explains,When the government has its debt bill come due, all of us will be on the hook.” It’s happened before: during the European debt crisis, Cypress seized private funds from its citizens’ bank accounts to cover its debts, with those who had been careful to save their pennies forced to relinquish between 40% to 60% of their assets.

      Could it happen here? Could the government actually seize private funds for its own gain?

      Look around you.

      It’s already happening.

      In the eyes of the government, “we the people, the voters, the consumers, and the taxpayers” are little more than pocketbooks waiting to be picked.

      Consider: The government can seize your home and your car (which you’ve bought and paid for) over nonpayment of taxes. Government agents can freeze and seize your bank accounts and other valuables if they merely “suspect” wrongdoing. And the IRS insists on getting the first cut of your salary to pay for government programs over which you have no say.

      We have no real say in how the government runs, or how our taxpayer funds are used, but we’re being forced to pay through the nose, anyhow.

      We have no real say, but that doesn’t prevent the government from fleecing us at every turn and forcing us to pay for endless wars that do more to fund the military industrial complex than protect us, pork barrel projects that produce little to nothing, and a police state that serves only to imprison us within its walls.

      If you have no choice, no voice, and no real options when it comes to the government’s claims on your property and your money, you’re not free.

      It wasn’t always this way, of course.

      Early Americans went to war over the inalienable rights described by philosopher John Locke as the natural rights of life, liberty and property.

      It didn’t take long, however—a hundred years, in fact—before the American government was laying claim to the citizenry’s property by levying taxes to pay for the Civil War. As the New York Times reports, “Widespread resistance led to its repeal in 1872.”

      Determined to claim some of the citizenry’s wealth for its own uses, the government reinstituted the income tax in 1894. Charles Pollock challenged the tax as unconstitutional, and the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in his favor. Pollock’s victory was relatively short-lived. Members of Congress—united in their determination to tax the American people’s income—worked together to adopt a constitutional amendment to overrule the Pollock decision.

      On the eve of World War I, in 1913, Congress instituted a permanent income tax by way of the 16th Amendment to the Constitution and the Revenue Act of 1913. Under the Revenue Act, individuals with income exceeding $3,000 could be taxed starting at 1% up to 7% for incomes exceeding $500,000.

      It’s all gone downhill from there.

      Unsurprisingly, the government has used its tax powers to advance its own imperialistic agendas and the courts have repeatedly upheld the government’s power to penalize or jail those who refused to pay their taxes.

      Irwin A. Schiff was one of the nation’s most vocal tax protesters. He spent a good portion of his life arguing that the income tax was unconstitutional, and he put his wallet where his conscience was: Schiff stopped paying federal taxes in 1974.

      Schiff paid the price for his resistance, too: he served three separate prison terms (more than 10 years in all) over his refusal to pay taxes. He died at the age of 87 serving a 14-year prison term. As constitutional activist Robert L. Schulz noted in Schiff’s obituary, “In a society where there is so much fear of government, and in particular of the I.R.S., [Schiff] was probably the most influential educator regarding the illegal and unconstitutional operation and enforcement of the Internal Revenue Code. It’s very hard to speak to power, but he did, and he paid a very heavy price.”

      It’s still hard to speak to power, and those who do are still paying a very heavy price.

      All the while the government continues to do whatever it likes—levy taxes, rack up debt, spend outrageously and irresponsibly—with little thought for the plight of its citizens.

      To top it all off, all of those wars the U.S. is so eager to fight abroad are being waged with borrowed funds. As The Atlantic reports, “For 15 years now, the United States has been putting these wars on a credit card… U.S. leaders are essentially bankrolling the wars with debt, in the form of purchases of U.S. Treasury bonds by U.S.-based entities like pension funds and state and local governments, and by countries like China and Japan.”

      If Americans managed their personal finances the way the government mismanages the nation’s finances, we’d all be in debtors’ prison by now.

      Still, the government remains unrepentant, unfazed and undeterred in its money grabs.

      While we’re struggling to get by, and making tough decisions about how to spend what little money actually makes it into our pockets after the federal, state and local governments take their share (this doesn’t include the stealth taxes imposed through tolls, fines and other fiscal penalties), the police state is spending our hard-earned tax dollars to further entrench its powers and entrap its citizens.

      For instance, American taxpayers have been forced to shell out more than $5.6 trillion since 9/11 for the military industrial complex’s costly, endless so-called “war on terrorism.”

      That translates to roughly $23,000 per taxpayer to wage wars abroad, occupy foreign countries, provide financial aid to foreign allies, and fill the pockets of defense contractors and grease the hands of corrupt foreign dignitaries.

      Mind you, that staggering $6 trillion is only a portion of what the Pentagon spends on America’s military empire.

      That price tag keeps growing, too.

      In this way, the military industrial complex will get even richer, and the American taxpayer will be forced to shell out even more funds for programs that do little to enhance our lives, ensure our happiness and well-being, or secure our freedoms.

      As Dwight D. Eisenhower warned in a 1953 speech:

      Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. This is, I repeat, the best way of life to be found on the road the world has been taking. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron. […] Is there no other way the world may live?

      This is still no way of life.

      Yet it’s not just the government’s endless wars that are bleeding us dry.

      We’re also being forced to shell out money for surveillance systems to track our movements, money to further militarize our already militarized police, money to allow the government to raid our homes and bank accounts, money to fund schools where our kids learn nothing about freedom and everything about how to comply, and on and on.

      Are you getting the picture yet?

      The government isn’t taking our money to make our lives better. Just take a look at the nation’s failing infrastructure, and you’ll see how little is being spent on programs that advance the common good.

      We’re being robbed blind so the governmental elite can get richer.

      This is nothing less than financial tyranny.

      “We the people” have become the new, permanent underclass in America.

      It’s tempting to say that there’s little we can do about it, except that’s not quite accurate.

      There are a few things we can do (demand transparency, reject cronyism and graft, insist on fair pricing and honest accounting methods, call a halt to incentive-driven government programs that prioritize profits over people), but it will require that “we the people” stop playing politics and stand united against the politicians and corporate interests who have turned our government and economy into a pay-to-play exercise in fascism.

      We’ve become so invested in identity politics that label us based on our political leanings that we’ve lost sight of the one label that unites us: we’re all Americans.

      The powers-that-be want to pit us against one another. They want us to adopt an “us versus them” mindset that keeps us powerless and divided.

      Trust me, the only “us versus them” that matters anymore is “we the people” against the police state.

      We’re all in the same boat, folks, and there’s only one real life preserver: that’s the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

      The Constitution starts with those three powerful words: “We the people.”

      The message is this: there is power in our numbers.

      That remains our greatest strength in the face of a governmental elite that continues to ride roughshod over the populace. It remains our greatest defense against a government that has claimed for itself unlimited power over the purse (taxpayer funds) and the sword (military might).

      This holds true whether you’re talking about health care, war spending, or the American police state.

      While we’re on the subject, do me a favor and don’t let yourself be fooled into believing that the next crop of political saviors will be any different from their predecessors. They all talk big when they’re running for office, and when they get elected, they spend big at our expense.

      As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, this is how the middle classes, who fuel the nation’s economy and fund the government’s programs, get screwed repeatedly.

      George Harrison, who would have been 77 this year, summed up this outrageous state of affairs in his song Taxman:

      If you drive a car, I’ll tax the street,

      If you try to sit, I’ll tax your seat.

      If you get too cold I’ll tax the heat,

      If you take a walk, I’ll tax your feet.

      Don’t ask me what I want it for

      If you don’t want to pay some more

      ‘Cause I’m the taxman, yeah, I’m the taxman.

      Now my advice for those who die

      Declare the pennies on your eyes

      ‘Cause I’m the taxman, yeah, I’m the taxman

      And you’re working for no one but me.


      Tyler Durden

      Thu, 02/27/2020 – 00:05

    • Thousands Of US Troops Return To Saudi Base After 17-Year Absence To "Deter Iran"
      Thousands Of US Troops Return To Saudi Base After 17-Year Absence To “Deter Iran”

      After a nearly 17 year absence, US troops have returned Saudi Arabia’s Prince Sultan Air Base. The last time the base, which lies about 60 miles outside of Riyadh, saw an American presence was in 2003, after which the troops moved to Qatar.

      The American troop surge into the gulf region to curtail Iran continues even as the world is focused on the coronavirus pandemic, which appears to be spreading in the Middle East.

      While the Pentagon focuses on “deterring Iran,” the Islamic Republic is busy dealing with a very different and more immediately devastating threat. Coronavirus has killed 19 Iranians among 139 confirmed to be infected, as we reported earlier, and one lawmaker has claimed that the true death toll is actually much higher.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      An F-22 Raptor at Prince Sultan Air Base, via World Defense.

      The prior US abandonment of the base was in large part because the US soldiers stationed in the strict Islamic kingdom became a “huge recruiting device for al Qaida,” according to then-Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz. In the decade prior it had been a key base for US forces starting after Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990.

      “We face a thinking enemy that is playing a real regional conflict for keeps, and they’re very good,” Gen. John Walker, the commander of the 378th Air Expeditionary Wing at the base, told The Wall Street Journal of the return of some 2,500 US troops to the base.

      They will reportedly man Patriot missile batteries stationed there, and F-15 fighter jets will operate out of the air base. 

      Despite the kingdom’s US-supplied anti-air defenses appearing to have failed during the Sept.14 drone and missile attack allegedly out of Yemen, US defense officials now say they’re confident in Patriot missile systems’ ability to intercept any inbound threats.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Prince Sultan Air Base. Image source: The Wall Street Journal

      According to the WSJ:

      U.S. defense officials now say they have shored up Saudi air defenses to the extent that they could prevent an airstrike like the one in September, thanks in part to the deployment of four American Patriot missile batteries in Saudi Arabia, including two stationed at Prince Sultan. Yet defense officials acknowledge that Patriot missiles, which cost millions of dollars, are an expensive tool to parry cheaper cruise missiles or drones.

      But there remains the question of whether they can defend against smaller “drone swarms” — given that as the report notes the Patriots were designed to protect against more sophisticated missiles. Yemen’s Houthis, for example, would likely deploy both primitive or locally made, as well as possibly more advanced Iranian-supplied rockets and drones.

      Meanwhile, infrastructure at the newly reestablished Prince Sultan Air Base appears rudimentary at this point: “At the moment, the American encampment at Prince Sultan remains a basic outpost. The Saudis have built a road to service the American section of the base, while the Americans are installing electricity for new tents, and replacing some tents with trailers,” the WSJ observes. 

      * * *

      But again, as Washington builds up forces in the Middle East, it could be the exact wrong time for such a surge, also given Iran is surely preoccupied with more pressing matters:

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 23:45

    • Russiagate: The Toxic Gift That Keeps On Giving
      Russiagate: The Toxic Gift That Keeps On Giving

      Authored by Kollibri Terre Sonnenblume via Counterpunch.rog,

      All smears are boomerang smears. That is why anyone worth a damn does not engage in it. That goes for the Russia-Gaters, the left/right smears on Gabbard, the years of left/right smears on Assange, the attacks on the Green Party and now the Russia narrative attacks on Sanders. Falling into line with the secret police will not save anyone. Red Scares target dissenters and promote war. Isn’t the history clear enough?”

      – Richard Moser

      The despicable exhuming of “Russia!” to smear Sanders recently smacks of desperation and dishonesty.

      Of course, the role played by the preposterous Russiagate conspiracy theory has always been the same: to be a distraction from issues that really matter. At best, it makes a mountain out of molehill. At worst, it’s straight up political psy-op.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      For those just tuning in, a re-cap:

      In 2016, Wikileaks released a cache of emails from a Democratic National Committee (DNC) server. The electronic correspondence revealed numerous unsavory and unethical activities, among them that the party had been rigging the primary process in favor of Hillary Clinton and against Bernie Sanders from the beginning, and that the Clinton campaign was deceptively funneling money from state parties into her national coffers. Various details of these and other shady endeavors were confirmed by other sources, including Donna Brazille, a party chairperson who personally leaked CNN debate questions to Clinton before the event, and ended up fessing up to it later.

      Given the graft-ridden history of US politics, none of this was particularly grievous, honestly speaking, but honestly speaking about it was the last thing the DNC leadership wanted to do, so, with the cooperation of much of the corporate media, they aimed their considerable firepower against Wikileaks and its founder, Julian Assange. That’s what’s called “shooting the messenger.”

      Clinton had already made it clear that it was her policy to up US antagonism against Russia, so it wasn’t long before that nation was accused of “hacking” the DNC servers and turning the trove over to Wikileaks in order to hurt Clinton and thereby help Trump. Never mind that the most credible evidence pointed to an inside joba leak, not a hackwith the responsible party therefore being some US American, not a Russian. Also never mind that claiming the information would negatively affect Clinton was up front admitting that it was incriminating.

      Not about to let something as minor as facts or actual culpability get in the way, the DNC and their media allies pushed the “Russia!” narrative hard, especially after Clinton’s election day lossanything to avoid admitting their own mistakes, such as the lack of campaigning or get-out-the-vote efforts in the key “swing” states that Trump narrowly won. Over the course of the next few months, one shrill accusation after another was blared in screaming headlines, only to be quietly walked back within a day or a few. But accuracy was never important; the goal was to create an impression: that the aberration of Trump could only be explained by the nefarious meddling of those pesky Russkies, not something more mundane and far more likely such as good old fashioned voter suppression. Roundly ignored was the work of investigative journalist Greg Palast in detailing just such malfeasance on a widespread basisincluding 60,000 votes not counted in Democrat stronghold Detroit, in a state that Trump won by less than 11,000 votes.

      But the cooperation of the corporate media was not enough. Non-corporate, independent mediawhich could call attention to the truthneeded to be squashed as well. Here the internet giants, such as Google, YouTube and Facebook, patriotically stepped up and began censoring outlets and authors across the political spectrum, both by de-platforming them and by burying them in the noise with algorithms. The excuse was fighting so-called “fake news.” Many well-known leftist websites experienced double-digit percentage declines in readership when these new policies were applied. Nor have the restrictions been lifted since then; rather they have been constantly honed, and the reach of many alternative voices continues to be eroded. It’s all been very Orwellian.

      The “Russia!” narrative seemed to fizzle out after former FBI Director Robert Mueller’s investigation failed to turn up more than a few dubious crumbs. Are we supposed to believe the election was swung by a Russian troll farm purchasing $100,000 in Facebook ads, only some of which were actually political? If you’re willing to buy that, I’ve got a bridge for sale in Brooklyn…

      In the meantime, the Trump administration had been executing a no-holds-barred attack on virtually every environmental and safety regulation of the last fifty yearsincluding those pertaining to clean air, clean water, and endangered specieswith virtually no news coverage or pushback. These are actions with very real consequences, potentially including extinction. Is it possible that some species of plants or animals might die from this planet because the DNC and the corporate media chose to focus on a conspiracy theory instead of the very real policies of the Trump administration? Yes, and that makes me livid.

      These policy changes have still not received the attention they deserve, by the way, because “Russia!” was followed by “Impeachment!” and now “Primaries!”

      What if every social media post about “Russia!” had instead focused on climate change? Or the opening of public lands to resource extraction? Or the gutting of the National Environmental Policy Act? Most people probably don’t even know what that last one is, which is sad. These are issues of immense importance, but they’ve gotten totally short shrift.

      And this is where it’s not just about the DNC and their corporate media stooges: it’s about all the people who fell for it and helped spread it around; the people who were not merely gullible, but who were eager to lap up whatever they were served and spit it out again on command; the people for whom “America” was already “great” and who were shocked by Trump’s popularity.

      I wasn’t shocked. I’m from Nebraska, and though I was as surprised as anyone that Trump squeaked through on election night, I was not mystified about his appeal. I didn’t need a fairy tale to explain his following. Watching him give his victory speech, I was like, “Yep, I know that guy, and I know the people who like him, and I see why they do.” (I got out of Nebraska as soon as I could!)

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      But liberal urbanites don’t get that, and they needed an explanation of how His Deplorableness could possibly have won. Hence the psychological attractiveness of the Russiagate narrative: it claimed that the force that propelled him to victory was not “American”; it came from outside. The nation’s deeply ingrained, widespread racism and patriarchyof which Trump was merely an expressioncould be papered over. “We’re better than this,” people could reassure themselves. Yeah, you wish.

      A teachable moment came and went. An opportunity for self-examination was passed over. A mirror was held up, but the gaze was quickly averted.

      That Trump is as “American” as apple pie was too much to consider.

      The new McCarthyism that accompanied Russiagate has exacted a terribly corrosive effect on political and social discourse, besides the damage it has incurred on alternative media.

      Anyone disagreeing with the mainline neoliberal Democratic agenda runs the risk of being slandered as a “Russian bot,” “Russian asset,” “Putin puppet” or something else equally as asinine. Maligning dissentor even merely progressive ideaswith this childish name-calling has become a casual liberal pastime. The range of discussion, which was already far too narrow, has constricted further. Right at a time when the dire state of the planet’s ecosystem and the ability of humans to survive within it requires creativity and big ideas, we’ve been subjected to smack-downs and small-mindedness. It’s enraging, frankly.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      So here’s Bernie Sanders, whorealisticallyis far from radical, and whose proposed policies fall desperately short of what is needed. But because he’s an FDR capitalist rather than a Clinton capitalistno, he’s not a socialistis being maligned by the establishment as if he’s Che Guevara come back from the dead. If only!

      The naked antipathy of the DNC and their corporate media shills for Sanders is a sight to behold. They are applying no veneer of impartiality to their smears. It was only a matter of time before “Russia!” was screeched in his direction. The fact that the attack came as a one-two punch from the New York Times and the Washington Post on the eve of the Nevada caucus betrayed its top-down coordination. As has been typical of stories in this genre, hypey headlines are paired incongruously with incoherent articles that fail to support the case. But it doesn’t matter. Again, it’s all about emotional impressions. Edward Bernays wrote the original playbook a century ago, and nothing’s changed except the delivery systems. It’s called propaganda.

      Alas, Sanders’ response did nothing to question the false premise of Russiagate, or its toxic effects on discourse, or its irresponsible inflaming of tensions with a nuclear power. If he hasn’t actually been a true believer in the “Russia!” bullshit since the beginning, he’s certainly been giving a damn good impression. But that’s just who he is on subjects of foreign policy: a man of big talk and few principles, all too willing to fold under the pressure of authority, and far too reluctant to challenge the narratives of the establishment. This too, is a teachable moment: If this is the best we can get, then that’s tragic. We need so much more.

      So what are we supposed to do?

      Well, there’s that old union song, “Which side are you on?” which goes:

      “Don’t scab for the bosses,
      Don’t listen to their lies.
      Us poor folks haven’t got a chance
      Unless we organize.”

      Indeed. Russiagate is just one of their lies and we’ve got to organize. We must remember, too, that we’ve got far, far more common in with the people of Russia than we do with the DNC oligarchs and their compliant media here.


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 23:25

    • Decoupling Accelerates: Google And Microsoft Shift Production From China
      Decoupling Accelerates: Google And Microsoft Shift Production From China

      Earlier this month, we mentioned how the Covid-19 outbreak would force companies with high centration of supply chains in China to “rework” operations to other countries to avoid future disruptions. 

      Nikkei Asian Review confirmed our thoughts on Wednesday when sources said Google and Microsoft, who are currently experiencing supply chain disruptions in China, will shift production of their phones, computers, and other devices to factories in Vietnam and Thailand in the coming months. 

      Two sources with direct knowledge of the shift said Google would begin production of its Pixel 4A smartphone in northern Vietnam in April. The Pixel 5 will start production in 2H20 in the Southeast Asian nation.

      Google asked a manufacturing partner in Thailand to immediately start production of its “smart home” related products, with expected delivery no later than 1H20, one source said. 

      Microsoft could have production online of its Surface devices, notebooks, and desktop computers in northern Vietnam sometime in 2Q, another two sources said. “The volume in Vietnam would be small at the beginning, but the output will pick up, and this is the direction that Microsoft wants,” a supply chain executive told Nikkei.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Google smartphones and Microsoft computers are mostly manufactured in China. From trade wars to virus impacts, the overreliance and high concentration of supply chains have left both firms in shock after production was recently halted as economic paralysis in China develops factory shutdowns. These firms are learning the hard way of overexposure of a supply chain to one particular geographical region. 

      “The unexpected coronavirus hit will definitely push electronics builders to further seek production capacity outside their most cost-effective production base of China,” a supply chain executive said. “No one could ignore risks after this. … It’s more than just cost — it’s about the continuity of supply chain management.”

      Another source indicated that Google had asked suppliers to send production equipment from China to Vietnam as quickly as possible. 

      Microsoft also accelerated efforts to shift production to Vietnam after the virus outbreak became more severe earlier this month, the source added. 

      As we’ve noted, Apple has a tremendous overexposure of their supply chain to China and will find it challenging to shift lines – this means shortages of iPhones and Airpods could be seen in the coming months.

      But here’s the dilemma, even if Google and Microsoft move production lines to Vietnam and Thailand, many of the parts used in their products are from China. The next obstacle that both companies have to overcome is finding alternative suppliers. 

      “It’s reasonable for companies like Google to want to speed up its pace of diversifying from China amid the coronavirus threat, while the trade war remains an uncertainty. But even if the final assembly process is outside of China, suppliers still need to ship some components from the country. … It’s a matter of the supply chain ecosystem, which takes time to rebuild,” IDC tech analyst Joey Yen told Nikkei. 

      It remains to be seen just how significant the impact of the epidemic on Google and Microsoft will be, but already judging by the supply chain shifts out of China and possible supplier issues that may occur after, it seems the virus impact is going to be a full year problem


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 23:05

    • Key Witness In Harvey Weinstein Trial Hit By Car And Hospitalized
      Key Witness In Harvey Weinstein Trial Hit By Car And Hospitalized

      Authored by John Vibes via TheMindUnleashed.com,

      Dr. Barbara Ziv the forensic psychologist who played a key role in the conviction of Harvey Weinstein by testifying as a witness in his trial was recently hospitalized after being hit by a car.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Not much is known about her condition or the circumstances of the incident aside from the fact that she was hit by a car while crossing the street and is in the hospital with multiple broken bones.

      Law and Crime noted that there is no evidence that Ziv’s injuries have anything to do with her role as a witness in the Weinstein trial, but the timing and the fact that Weinstein is notorious for his ruthless intimidation tactics makes the incident suspicious. Weinstein’s reputation led many potential witnesses and even journalists to fear for their lives when dealing with his case.

      Ziv took the stand last month as an expert witness in the case against Weinstein where she gave in-depth psychological analysis about why his victims did not initially report the crimes and why survivors of sexual assault will often continue friendships or business relationships with their attackers, especially when that person is extremely powerful and influential as Weinstein was.

      As devastating as sexual assault is, most individuals think, ‘Ok, I can put it behind me. I can move on with my life. I don’t want it to get worse. I don’t want this person who sexually assaulted me to ruin my friendships or put my job in jeopardy. I am just going to put it in a box and forget what happened. I don’t want it to get worse, but they can’t,” Ziv said in court.

      Ziv also testified as an expert witness in the case against Bill Cosby.

      This week, a jury in New York found Harvey Weinstein guilty on charges of rape and criminal sexual act in the first degree. He was initially supposed to be sent to Rikers Island but ended up being diverted to a local hospital after complaining of chest pains.


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 22:45

    • YouTube Isn't A Public Forum: PragerU Loses Conservative Censorship Case
      YouTube Isn’t A Public Forum: PragerU Loses Conservative Censorship Case

      Social media platforms accused of politically biased, selective enforcement policies will be allowed to continue discriminating against conservatives, according to a Wednesday court ruling from the Ninth Circuit court of appeals – which has been heavily criticized for anti-Trump rulings on immigration and other matters.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The court rejected an argument by conservative radio talk show host Dennis Prager, who claimed that his conservative PragerU videos were receiving unfair treatment by the Silicon Valley behemoth – determining that YouTube, which is owned by Google, is not a state actor subject to First Amendment constraints.

      A California federal judge first dismissed the 2017 complaint in March 2018 on the grounds that YouTube isn’t a public forum and can regulate content as they see fit, according to the Hollywood Reporter.

      On Wednesday, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that decision and rejected PragerU’s contention that the site has become a digital-era public forum and its power to moderate content is a threat to fair dissemination of conservative viewpoints on public issues.

      Using private property as a forum for public discourse is nothing new,” writes Circuit Judge M. Margaret McKeown. “Long before the internet, people posted announcements on neighborhood bulletin boards, debated weighty issues in coffee houses, and shouted each other down in community theaters.

      While those methods seem “quaint” compared to the 400 hours of video uploaded to YouTube each day, the underlying issues don’t change.

      “Despite YouTube’s ubiquity and its role as a public-facing platform, it remains a private forum, not a public forum subject to judicial scrutiny under the First Amendment,” writes McKeown, adding that both the First Amendment and Supreme Court precedent present “insurmountable barriers” to PragerU’s argument. –Hollywood Reporter

      “Just last year, the Court held that ‘merely hosting speech by others is not a traditional, exclusive public function and does not alone transform private entities into state actors subject to First Amendment constraints,” McKeown wrote. “The internet does not alter this state action requirement of the First Amendment.”

      Prager’s lawsuit focused on YouTube’s so-called Restricted Mode, which slaps age constraints on content, requires viewers to click to watch, and disallows videos from being embedded on websites. The restrictions are aimed at videos containing alcohol, sexual situations, violence and other mature subjects – such as conservative content apparently. Restricted videos are also demonetized, so creators cannot derive income from third-party advertisers.

      Creators can appeal restricted mode.

      “YouTube does not perform a public function by inviting public discourse on its property,” McKeown added. “To characterize YouTube as a public forum would be a paradigm shift.”

      The court notes that both sides made hyperbolic arguments about decisions not in their favor, with PragerU attempting to instill fear about the tyranny of big-tech and YouTube arguing the Internet itself would be undone by government speech regulation.

      “While these arguments have interesting and important roles to play in policy discussions concerning the future of the Internet, they do not figure into our straightforward application of the First Amendment,” writes McKeown. “Because the state action doctrine precludes constitutional scrutiny of YouTube’s content moderation pursuant to its Terms of Service and Community Guidelines, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of PragerU’s First Amendment claim.” –Hollywood Reporter

      The 9th Circuit also tossed PragerU’s claim of false advertising.

      “YouTube’s braggadocio about its commitment to free speech constitutes opinions that are not subject to the Lanham Act,” reads the decision. “Lofty but vague statements like ‘everyone deserves to have a voice, and that the world is a better place when we listen, share and build community through our stories’ … are classic, non-actionable opinions or puffery.”


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 22:25

    • Four Reasons Inequality Isn't What You Think It Is
      Four Reasons Inequality Isn’t What You Think It Is

      Authored by Antonis Giannakopoulos via The Mises Institute,

      One of the defining characteristics of advocates for socialism is an obsession with equality. According to this line of thinking, inequality is the central problem of the modern world, and it demands a centralized solution. Thus, socialists – and more mild social democrats – push to use the power of the state to force the transfer of wealth from the productive and successful to those who are less so. This is the way to achieve social justice, they contend.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      But inequality is not the societal plague that socialists allege it to be.

      The Source of Wealth: Consumer Judgment

      Contrary to popular belief, the way to make money is not to exploit one’s customers. The reality is the opposite. Wealth is created by identifying the problems that people have and creating products that provide a solution and improve their lives.

      In this process, the consumer leads the process by expressing his own preferences in the marketplace. If a consumer feels that a product is overpriced, he will not make an exchange. If a product seems worthwhile, he will buy it willingly. The sum of these individual choices—to purchase or not—make or break a business on the market, and this is the consumers’ prerogative. In order to meet his own needs, a person must produce something that satisfies another’s needs, whether they be labor, industrial machinery, or fine cuff links.

      Does Wealth Accrue at the Expense of the Poor?

      One of the socialists’ key assumptions is that there is always a losing side in a transaction. They think that wealth is like a pie, and that the rich take the largest slice, leaving workers and customers with almost nothing. In reality the market is always expanding the pie, and voluntary exchanges are always win-win when they are made.

      Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and all the other “evil capitalists” have managed to create an unprecedented amount of wealth, but not only for themselves. Those working for them have benefited from their jobs, and the people who buy their products and services have benefited from better or cheaper goods (or both). Other benefits include more time to pursue more important things, and in ways that cannot be quantified (i.e., they are measured in psychic profit). The entrepreneurs, in turn, have benefited from the services of their workers—which are well worth paying for. Entrepreneurs also benefit from the voluntary purchases made by their customers.

      Profit and Competition Are Not Antithetical to Collaboration

      Socialists pit profit and competition against an ideal of sharing and collaboration. But rather than being a wicked, stolen good, profit is a crucial incentive for collaborative human action.

      People are always searching for the best and cheapest products in order to satisfy their needs, and their demands raise prices. The prospect of profit quickly pushes entrepreneurs into producing what people want—and what they are willing to pay for. Profits illustrate how much people value an entrepreneur’s services. Consumers only pay if the entrepreneur satisfies their desires.

      As long as there are profits to be made, others enter the market. The competition spurs entrepreneurs to make production more efficient and cheaper, because the greater the competition, the more the businessman will have to do to earn the customer’s business. As more goods enter the market, consumers can be more picky about whom to purchase from, and prices drop. It’s their own demand that sets the prices, and once they are satisfied and there’s not as much profit in the business, entrepreneurs shift to making other things that people want.

      As many Austrian and non-Austrian economists have figured out, the market is an everyday “voting system” of what needs to be produced. Every penny acts as a vote for how best to use limited resources. Profits point entrepreneurs toward what people want most badly. The resulting production is a form of collaboration rather than exploitation. People can do more, because they don’t have to do everything themselves, and they can focus on what they do best.

      Income Inequality Is Heightened by a Restrained Market

      The Left makes the mistake of arguing that only the rich have gotten richer and attack capitalism without looking at the facts. The market has made nearly everyone richer, not only in terms of income but also in terms of the overall quality of life and the products that they own.

      Leftists also ignore income mobility in market economies, when studies show that in fact most people born to the richest fifth of Americans fall out of that bracket within twenty years while most of those born to the poorest fifth climb to a higher quintile and even to the top.

      Though their rhetoric makes it seem surprising, this makes sense. As Ludwig von Mises pointed out in The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality, the businessman owes his wealth to his customers, and this wealth is inevitably lost or diminished when others enter the market who can better satisfy the consumer through lower prices and/or a better quality of goods and services.

      The problem with income inequality today is that it isn’t entirely a byproduct of the free market but instead is the result of a market crippled by interventionist policies, such as regulations, expensive licenses, and the most complicated tax system in the history of this country. Such restrictions have limited competition and made wealth creation more difficult, causing the stagnation of the middle and lower classes.

      Though leftists contend that these restrictions protect people from the “dangers” of the free market, they actually protect the corporate interests that progressives claim to stand against.

      Colossal businesses like Amazon and Walmart in fact favor higher minimum wages and increased regulations. They have the funds to implement them with ease, and such regulations end up acting as a protective barrier, keeping startups and potential competitors from entering the market. With competition blocked, these businesses can grow artificially large and don’t have to work as hard to earn people’s business. Instead they can spend money on lawyers and DC lobbyists to fence small businesses out of the market.

      Ironically, efforts to regulate businesses in the name of protecting laborers and consumers harms small businesses and makes everyone less equal than they could be in a free market.

      Conclusion

      Markets are not the enemy of inequality. Regulated markets are. The income inequality that naturally occurs in the free market as a result of human uniqueness is needlessly amplified by restrictive government policies to the detriment of all.

      Voluntary exchanges in capitalism are mutually advantageous. If they weren’t, the exchange would never take place. People who live in countries with more economic and social freedom enjoy greater incomes and a higher standard of living. Free trade has contributed more to the alleviation of poverty than have all the government-run programs. Socialist intervention in the market can only distance man from eradicating poverty and from happiness: only unrestrained competition driven by profit can bring about the expansion of choice, the fall in prices, and the increased satisfaction that make us wealthier.


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 22:05

    • Over 20 Killed, 200 Wounded In Sectarian Riots Which Coincided With Trump's India Visit
      Over 20 Killed, 200 Wounded In Sectarian Riots Which Coincided With Trump’s India Visit

      The death toll from days of riots which coincided with President Trump’s first ever official visit to India early this week has risen to at least 20 killed and nearly 200 wounded, Reuters reports. 

      New Delhi has seen the worst sectarian violence in decades after Hindus and minority Muslims clashed — along with security forces attempting to put down the violence over the controversial new citizenship law, which prioritizes citizenship for non-Muslims from neighboring countries who immigrate.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      “This was the first time that the protests have set off major bloodshed between Hindus and Muslims,” crossing “an old and dangerous fault line,” The New York Times reports.

      Shortly before concluding his two day visit Trump was asked about the unrest by reporters. He said he “heard about” the law but that it is “up to India” to handle.

      “As Air Force One flew Trump and his delegation out of New Delhi late Tuesday, Muslim families huddled in a mosque in the city’s northeast, praying that Hindu mobs wouldn’t burn it down,” The Associated Press reports

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      The riots are considered a deep embarrassment for Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who appealed for calm on Wednesday.

      “Peace and harmony are central to our ethos. I appeal to my sisters and brothers of Delhi to maintain peace and brotherhood at all times,” Modi said in a tweet.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Police and paramilitary security forces were out in greater force on the streets of the Indian capital Wednesday, after sectarian mobs had been engaged in running clashes involving guns, knives, clubs, and stones.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      An eyewitness report by Reuters detailed the following

      Critics say the law is biased against Muslims and undermines India’s secular constitution. Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party has denied it has any bias against India’s more than 180 million Muslims.

      Reuters witnesses saw mobs wielding sticks and pipes walking down streets in parts of northeast Delhi on Tuesday, amid arson attacks and looting. Thick clouds of black smoke billowed from a tyre market that was set ablaze.

      Many of the wounded had suffered gunshot injuries, hospital officials said. At least two mosques in northeast Delhi were set on fire.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Throughout Trump’s visit, widely viewed as a success, the president frequently sidestepped the issue of the citizenship law.

      He had said during his opening visit remarks Monday at Motera Stadium: “Your nation has always been admired around the Earth as the place where millions upon millions of Hindus and Muslims and Sikhs and Jains, Buddhists, Christians, and Jews worship side by side in harmony.” And further: “Your unity is an inspiration to the world.”

      The country has seen months of protests over the citizenship law, but exploded into their worst violence upon Trump’s visit. 


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 21:45

    • China Car Sales Continue To Crater, Down 83% For The Third Week In February
      China Car Sales Continue To Crater, Down 83% For The Third Week In February

      Chinese auto sales continue to be a sinking ship on the heels of both an auto recession that has been in full swing for the last 18-24 months – and now the impact of the coronavirus.

      Though the narrative coming out of China is that the country is attempting to return to some normalcy, the data from the company’s auto market tells us very differently. Retail car sales in the country are down 83% year over year for the third week in February. For the week, the country’s auto sales dropped to 5,411 units per day, according to the China Passenger Car Association.

      They also stated that vehicle production and sales would show a “more noticeable” drop in February than in January, something Zero Hedge readers already knew based on our analysis of January numbers out of China, where we said exactly that. The CAAM said that January vehicle sales fell 18.7% on the year and 27.5% on month.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      But the story is going to be from February onward. 

      Recall, just 5 days ago we wrote that Chinese auto sales had gone into “full collapse” and fell 92% for the first half of February. 

      China recorded 4,909 units sold in the first 16 days of the month, which is down from 59,930 in the same period last year. We said then what we’ll say again today: “If this figure doesn’t make it clear that the pandemic is having an effect outside of Hubei province in China, we’re not sure what will do it.

       

      The China Passenger Car Association said days ago: “Very few dealerships opened in the first weeks of February and they have had very little customer traffic.”

      Photographs out of China, as the virus rages its way through several major eastern cities, make the country look like something between a ghost town and wasteland. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Which it why it wasn’t surprising late last week to hear CPCA Secretary General Cui Dongshu say: “There was barely anybody at car dealers in the first week of February as most people stayed at home.”

      Again, Zero Hedge readers should not be surprised by the February numbers. We noted that while China’s January decline was partially attributable to the coronavirus outbreak, it wasn’t until the end of January and early February when China was placed essentially on a full lockdown due to the outbreak of the virus.

      We’d like to speculate that the small tick up in the third week of February is a promising sign, but we think we know better. We’ll continue to follow the story very closely and will update when new data becomes available. 

       


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 21:25

    • 'Not A Real Democrat' – Florida Lawsuit Seeks To Exclude Bernie Sanders From Primary Ballot
      ‘Not A Real Democrat’ – Florida Lawsuit Seeks To Exclude Bernie Sanders From Primary Ballot

      Democrats are failing to halt Bernie Sanders’ march toward the nomination after the latest Democratic debates. This has prompted two Tallahassee men to file a lawsuit against Sanders to remove him from the Florida primary ballot, reported Tallahassee Democrat

      Frank Bach, a retired mail carrier, and George Brown, a retired social worker, filed their lawsuit in a Leon County circuit court on Monday, requesting a judge to exclude Sanders from the primary ballot because he’s not a genuine Democrat, but rather an “independent.” 

      The complaint read that the Vermont senator would be “interloping improperly” and “unlawfully” in the March vote if he remained on the ballot. 

      “The plaintiffs have the right to cast their March 17 Democratic presidential preference primary votes for those who are really Democrats, not independents, and are entitled to this court’s protection of their right to vote for a Democrat, with the results not diluted by Defendant Sanders’ unlawful participation as an independent interloping improperly in the (primary),” the complaint said.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      “Defendant Sanders is clearly an independent and is clearly not a Democrat, by his own definition,” the complaint adds. “His current ‘day job’ is as a United States senator, and he has consistently, proudly asserted his service in that role as an independent.”

      Juan Penalosa, executive director of the Florida Democratic Party, dismissed the lawsuit and called it absolutely “ridiculous.” Penalosa said, ” the Florida Democratic Party Executive Committee voted unanimously to place Sen. Sanders on the Florida ballot. Votes cast for the senator are valid and must be counted.”

      The lawsuit comes as Sanders is seen as an early front-runner to become the Democratic nominee after he won the popular vote in New Hampshire, Nevada, and Iowa. VP Joe Biden and billionaire Michael Bloomberg have intensified their attacks on Sanders as his popularity increases among US voters. 

      While it’s too late to withdraw Sanders from the Florida ballot, the complaint notes that any mailed ballots in the Democratic primary should be set aside if in favor of Sanders. 

      As far as the complaint succeeding in court, it’s a long shot but should outline just how much the Democratic party is willing to do directly or indirectly, to make sure Sanders does not become the nominee


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 21:05

    • Coronavirus Paralyzes Global Credit Market As New Issuance Crashes To Zero
      Coronavirus Paralyzes Global Credit Market As New Issuance Crashes To Zero

      In the early days, when virtually nobody paid attention to the coronavirus pandemic which China was doing everything in its power to cover up, markets were not only predictably ignoring the potential global plague – after all central banks can always print more money, or is that antibodies – but until last week, were hitting all time highs. All that changed when it became apparent that for all its data manipulation, China was simply unable to reboot its economy as hundreds of millions of workers refused to believe the government had the viral plague under control, starting a potentially catastrophic 2,3 month countdown to millions of small and medium Chinese businesses going bankrupt, resulting not only in untold devastation in the world’s 2nd largest economy but paralyzing and crippling supply chains across the world. Worse, it also triggered the biggest equity selloff in years.

      And now, the coronavirus pandemic is about to leave yet another market in critical condition as the global credit machine is grinding to a halt.

      As Bloomberg points out, the $2.6 trillion international bond market, where the world’s biggest companies raise money to fund everything from acquisitions to factory upgrades, came to a virtual standstill as the coronavirus spreads panic across company boardrooms.

      While hardly a surprise with US equity markets suffering one of their worst selloffs since the great depression, Wall Street banks recorded their third straight day without any high-grade bond offerings, an unheard of event – especially in this day and age of ravenous yield apetite – outside of holiday and seasonal slowdowns. Across the Atlantic, European debt bankers had their first day of 2020 without a deal on Wednesday. And bond issuance in Asia, where the virus first emerged, has also slowed to a trickle.

      As Bloomberg puts it, “it has been a remarkable turn of events for a market where investors had been snapping up almost anything on offer amid a global dash for yield. Europe had been enjoying its strongest ever start to a year for issuance, and sales of U.S. junk bonds have been on the busiest pace in at least a decade. With so many borrowers having postponed their issuance plans, a calming in global markets could kickstart debt sales again.”

      Honeywell, Virgin Money UK and Transport for London were among the numerous European borrowers who had lined up deals before financial markets turned upside down. Before the slowdown, Europe had seen 239 billion euros ($260 billion) of bonds sold in January alone. Across in the US, the investment-grade market was expecting around $25 billion of sales this week before virus fears froze the market on Monday. Excluding the seasonally dead December holiday season and typical two-week summer hiatus in late August, there hasn’t been that long of a break to start the week since July 2018.

      As shown in the chart below, after record new issuance in the investment grade market, the last week of September has seen a total paralysis in the primary market, similar to the freeze of China’s economy.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Amid a surge in uncertainty that has crushed dip buyers, and left even central bankers scrambling to figure out what the proper response is, credit investors have been rattled by the potential impact on company earnings – now that most realize collapsing supply chains could result in catastrophic number in coming quarters – from disruption caused by the virus, which has seen huge parts of global supply chains shutting down. Meanwhile, as traders await the the panic selling to kick in, a derivatives index that gauges credit market fear in the U.S. had its biggest jump in more than three years on Monday as investors rushed to hedge against a wider selloff.

      “It’s a coin toss as to what tomorrow will look like, or even the rest of today,” said Tony Rodriguez, head of fixed income strategy at Nuveen. “You have to respect the fact that when you don’t have an information advantage to not make any significant moves.”

      It’s not just the IG market: offerings also came to a halt in the junk-bond market, where until the past week, $67 billion of sales had been running at the fastest pace since at least 2009, Bloomberg data showed. Mining giant Cleveland-Cliffs was the latest to try and crack the primary market freeze on Wednesday, with a $950 million offering of secured and unsecured notes testing the market in an attempt to refinance an acquisition target’s debt. And the Canadian market remained open for business as utility company Hydro One Ltd. raised C$1.1 billion ($827 million) in the largest Canadian dollar bond from a non-financial company this year.

      Ironically, one can argue that there is a simple way to reboot the credit market: just offer higher yields:

      Overall borrowing costs remain very low, however. A rally in U.S. Treasuries has sent all-in yields on U.S. investment-grade debt to record lows. U.S. investment-grade funds have reaped near-record inflows each week this year, as investors seek high-quality income assets. High-yield and leveraged loanfunds, however, have seen more outflows.

      Almost as if investors don’t buy credit for the (relative) yield, but for the capital gains from selling it to a greater fool.

      Meanwhile, the worsening pandemic is already taking a toll on companies’ balance sheets, with drinks maker Diageo set to book as much as a 325 million-pound ($422 million) hit to organic net sales. In the U.S., United Airlines Holdings withdrew its 2020 profit forecast Tuesday as it can’t guarantee its earlier earnings goal. Microsoft was the latest to cut its guidance for personal computer sales. And it’s all downhill from here.

      The biggest concern however: with bond markets frozen, just how will IG-rated companies obtain the funding they need to keep buying back their stock, and pushing the market higher. In fact, one can argue that the freeze of the credit market is far more dangerous to the stock market than the inability to refinance a 1% bond with something paying 0.5%. If that’s the case, expect far more pain for stocks in coming weeks and months as the market’s entire buyback spree of the past three years goes into a very painful and dramatic reverse.


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 20:29

    • SoftBank 'Vision Fund' Chief Carried Out Weinstein-Style Sabotage Campaign To Sideline Rivals
      SoftBank ‘Vision Fund’ Chief Carried Out Weinstein-Style Sabotage Campaign To Sideline Rivals

      Over the past six months, the words “SoftBank”, “Vision Fund” and “WeWork” have become emblematic of the excessive valuations of Silicon Valley “unicorns”. When a series of anonymously-sourced reports by WSJ and several rivals claimed investors were valuing WeWork at just one-fifth of its massive $47 billion, the company quickly pulled the IPO, before admitting that without the money from the IPO and a $6 billion credit line that was contingent on the dealing going through, WeWork would be insolvent in a matter of months.

      This triggered a frantic rescue by WeWork’s biggest backer, SoftBank, which had poured both the firm’s capital, and capital belonging to its “Vision Fund” investors (mostly the Saudis) based on the investing ‘vision’ of Chairman Masayoshi Son, who controlled SoftBank and had a reputation as one of the world’s most successful momentum investors. By the time the dust had cleared, SoftBank had committed another $6 billion to WeWork, and its reputation was in tatters. It would go on to become the butt of jokes as other SoftBank backed firms shut down or saw their valuations eviscerated.

      The entire episode shocked the international investing community. It also didn’t reflect well on SoftBank’s culture, as the VC arm of the company, and the Vision Fund in particular, was characterized as a snakepit, with rival executives jockeying for Masa Son’s favor.

      Now, a lengthy investigative report written by two WSJ reporters delves into a stunning sabotage campaign allegedly organized by the executive who led the Vision Fund through many of its disastrous investments. Rajeev Mishra, the executive vice president in charge of the Vision Fund, allegedly enlisted the help of a shady Italian banker to sideline two rival executives so he could have exclusive control over the Vision Fund and its $100 billion pile of capital.

      His schemes would put Harvey Weinstein to shame.

      Their methods including hiring private investigators to tale the men, setting up an attempted ‘honeypot’ to try and ensnare one of the men in a sex scandal and leaking private details stolen from the mens’ bank accounts to reporters and allege that it’s evidence of corruption.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Rajeev Mishra

      The Italian banker, Alessandro Benedetti, also reportedly had experience working with private intelligence operatives and computer hackers, making him an ideal fit for Mishra’s purposes. During the course of the scheme, it’s clear Benedetti began to see Mishra as a friend and benefactor, and was disappointed when Mishra failed to secure him a lucrative job in payment for the scheme – though at one point he did wire Benedetti $500,000 for ‘expenses’.

      Somehow, WSJ managed to obtain emails between Benedetti and Mishra (as for how, we have a few ideas).

      It’s unclear how much Benedetti spent on the campaign, but it involved hiring several professional spies, employing tactics also favored by newly convicted fallen Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein. 

      That month, Mr. Benedetti sent a team to Tokyo to set up the so-called honey trap, in which one or more women would lure Mr. Arora to a hotel room rigged with cameras in an attempt to obtain compromising images, people familiar with the effort said.

      The mission failed: Mr. Arora didn’t fall for the ploy.

      Around that time, Mr. Benedetti hired K2 Intelligence LLC, a private intelligence firm, to investigate Messrs. Arora and Sama and disseminate findings to the media, according to emails and people familiar with the hiring. He also recruited a Swiss private intelligence operative, Nicolas Giannakopoulos, to work on the campaign.

      Mr. Giannakopoulos distributed to journalists screenshots of Mr. Arora’s and Mr. Sama’s private banking records and emails, according to messages reviewed by the Journal. Mr. Giannakopoulos didn’t respond to requests for comment.

      During one ‘operation’, one of the team’s ‘operative’s allegedly bribed a journalist to publish a story raising questions about a deal that one of Mishra’s marks had worked on.

      K2 hired a London public-relations firm, Powerscourt Group, to try to get K2’s findings and information provided by Mr. Benedetti into the press. The operatives often referred to Mr. Arora by a code name, “Mr. West.”

      In September 2015, Mr. Giannakopoulos, who goes by Nico, contacted a freelance reporter to pitch a story about a troubled telecom deal Mr. Arora played a part in. Reporter Mark Hollingsworth took the story to The Independent, a British newspaper. An email about this arrangement suggested the reporter would be paid if the story was published.

      “The Independent is not a high quality newspaper so I’ve asked Nico only to offer a success fee,” David Robertson, then a K2 employee working on the campaign, wrote in an email to several people.

      The Independent published the article October 2015. Mr. Hollingsworth said the notion he received a success fee was “completely and utterly false.”

      A spokeswoman for The Independent said it expects journalists to adhere to “all applicable bribery and corruption laws.”

      A spokeswoman for K2 said the firm doesn’t discuss clients or client matters. Powerscourt’s CEO said the same.

      Amazingly, all of Mishra and Benedetti’s sabotage attempts amounted to nothing, as their compatriots inside SoftBank seemed not to care about the allegations.

      At SoftBank, the article and others that resulted were mostly seen as noise, people familiar with the internal reaction said. By November 2015, Mr. Benedetti was trying a new tack: a shareholder campaign. He asked law firm Susman Godfrey LLP to represent him as an investor making claims about SoftBank, Mr. Arora and others, emails show.

      The law firm declined to take the work, and Mr. Benedetti then went to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. Mr. Benedetti arranged for Mr. Giannakopoulos to be the shareholder nominally behind the claims, but stayed closely involved, according to people familiar with the events.

      This inspired them to try a new tack: Shareholder activism. Eventually, this proved successful, Mishra’s rivals resigned, and he was left in charge of the Vision Fund.

      In January 2016, a Boies Schiller lawyer sent a public letter questioning Mr. Arora’s investments in Indian startups and asking for an investigation of alleged conflicts of interest. Mr. Arora’s “past conduct also demonstrates his willingness to put his personal interests—and those of his partners—above those of the companies that have employed him as a senior executive,” the letter said.

      More letters followed throughout 2016 from Boies Schiller and a law firm that succeeded it, prompting SoftBank’s board to launch an investigation into Mr. Arora, which found the allegations to be false. Over time, critical shareholder letters began to focus on Mr. Sama as well.

      In June 2016, Mr. Arora resigned from SoftBank. He said he made the decision after Mr. Son chose not to give up his CEO post. Messrs. Son and Arora had begun to disagree on investments, said people familiar with the internal dynamics.

      Benedetti had hoped that once Mishra was in charge of the Vision Fund, he would reward Benedetti with a cushy job. But this never happened, though the emails suggest that Mishra tried to set Benedetti up with friends, and even lobbied them to hire him.

      Eventually, Benedetti grew bitter, and although he wasn’t named as the source, we wouldn’t be surprised to learn that WSJ’s sources are either Benedetti, or some kind of intermediary.

      Americans simply assume that many successful business executives, politicians and other powerful figures are irredeemable sociopaths. It’s rare that we get to see them prove it so brazenly.

      And just like with the Credit Suisse spying scandal, we can’t help but wonder, are these tactics really the norm in the rarefied world of high finance?


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 20:25

    • President Trump Appoints VP Pence As Coronavirus Czar, Stocks Slide
      President Trump Appoints VP Pence As Coronavirus Czar, Stocks Slide

      Update (1845): In his long-awaited press conference, President Trump defended the White House’s response to the coronavirus outbreak, insisted that he would accept whatever amount of crisis-response funds approved by Congress and appointed VP Mike to be his “Coronavirus Czar”.

      In the middle of Trump’s presser, the Washington Post dropped a bombshell report, claiming that the latest US coronavirus case has been confirmed in Northern California, and that it was the first case with no clear path of origin. That case would be the US’s 16th.

      Trump started with an update on the 15 confirmed US cases that weren’t infected aboard the Diamond Princess or in Wuhan, claiming that 8 of 15 have returned, only 1 is still in the hospital, and 5 have fully recovered.

      On the subject of the emergency spending package, Trump said that “if Congress wants to give us more, we’ll take it.”

      “We’re requesting 2.5. Some Republicans would like us to get 4 and some Democrats want 8.5,” he said.

      Though he added that “hopefully we won’t need too much because we’ve done a tremendous job,” Trump said.

      In one of the funnier moments, Trump remarked about the flu: “The flu kills between 25,000 to 60,000 people a year – that was shocking to me.”

      The president also stressed America’s readiness for anything.

      “We’re very, very ready for this, for anything, whether it’s going to be a breakout with larger proportions or whether we stay at that very low level,” Trump said.

      Moving on to the subject of a vaccine, Trump said he expected one would be finished “fairly rapidly.”

      “We have a lot of great quarantine facilities we’re rapidly developing a vaccine and speaking to a the doctors we think this is something we can develop fairly rapidly.”

      Later in the presser, Dr. Fauci, the CDC’s infectious-disease response head, noted during the presser that it will take at least six months for ‘Phase One’ trial to be conducted. Though this is the fastest we have ever gone from a  sequence of a virus to a trial, it will still take a year to a year and a half to come up with a vaccine. We will know soon if it works.

      Dr. Anne Schuchat of the CDC also spoke, saying “the message is clear: more cases are expected… which explains why Dow futures are extending losses (below the lows of the day).

      “We do expect more cases and this is a good time to prepare,” she said.

      HHS Secretary Azar also spoke, reiterating that that Americans, hospitals and local governments across the country should start to prepare in case coronavirus begins spreading more widely here.

      After Trump announced his plan to appoint VP Mike Pence to lead the virus response, he invited Pence up to speak about his qualifications and his plan for leading the federal response. Pence cited his experience in dealing with the MERS outbreak in 2014 – Indiana was the first state to report a case in that instance.”

      As the Q&A began, Trump told a reporter that  “no I don’t think it’s inevitable” when asked by a reporter about the CDC’s comments yesterday about the likelihood of “community” outbreaks. Trump answered another reporter’s question, claiming the US may need t restrict travel from Italy and South Korea, though “this is not the right time.”

      The outbreak will impact US GDP, Trump acknowledged, though he said the impact “cannot really be determined.”

      One reporter asked Trump for his thoughts on the stock market’s wild ride, which he blamed – in comic fashion – on the Dems.

      “I think investors looked on stage last night and said if there’s even a possibility that could happen – I think it takes a hit for that. I think the stock market will recover. the Economy is very strong. The consumer is doing better than they’ve ever done.”

      As for quarantine measures, Trump said he has plans for quarantines “on larger scale” if needed, though apparently the market didn’t like that.

      Stock futures moved lower during the presser as Trump spoke about the administration’s virus-response plans:

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      As the Q&A dragged on, Trump addressed the Olympics, and whether schools should start preparing for the virus.

      Trump was also asked what he’d say to Americans planning a vacation, and that the games would go on.

      “Hopefully, they’re going to be able to do that. We think, we hope it’s going to be in good shape by that time,” Trump said.

      “This ends, this is going to end. Hopefully it’ll be sooner rather than later,” Trump said. Travel companies whose stocks have fallen will pick their business back up then, he predicts.

      As for whether schools should be prepared, Trump said “every aspect of our society should be prepared.”

      Trump also threw some shade at “incompetent” Nancy Pelosi.

      “I think she’s incompetent,” Trump said of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who criticized his administration’s response to the coronavirus.

      Asked about the travel restrictions, Trump said he won’t loosen travel restrictions on China at this time.

      As for whether he think people are panicking, Trump said. “You don’t want to see panic, because there’s no reason to be panicked,” Trump said.

      Of course, Trump can’t talk about a market selloff without bashing the Fed, which he did on Wednesday. Specifically, he said he was “not happy” with the Fed funds rate, and blamed the Fed, Boeing and GE for the market carnage, while also bashing the central bank for the strong dollar.

      “I totally disagree with our Fed; I think our Fed has made a terrible mistake,” Trump said.

      Asked why Trump put Pence in charge of the virus response if Azar is doing such a good job (as Trump insisted following the news about the ‘coronavirus czar’ earlier today), Trump said Azar has other priorities on his plate, including drug pricing.

      With reporters scrambling to think of every “gotcha” question imaginable, Trump was asked how he could possibly trust the Chinese after they lied during the early days of the epidemic. Trump dismissed these claims and insisted the US is still working with China, and that his relationship with Xi hasn’t been impacted by the outbreak.

      * * *

      A day after he sought to minimize fears of the virus spreading widely across the U.S., President Trump is holding a White House press conference (pushed back from 1800ET to 1830ET) alongside experts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

      Trump and members of his administration have been sending mixed messages about the virus (WH’s Kudlow “contained”, CDC’s Messonnier “it’s coming!”) and we assume tonight will be to ‘clarify’ the message and attempt to calm markets (after another fall today.

      Watch Live at 1830ET:

      As AP reports, on Capitol Hill, senior lawmakers called for a bipartisan spending package that would give federal, state and local officials more resources. Congress in recent years took a similar approach with the opioid epidemic, pumping out federal dollars for treatment and prevention.

      Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York unveiled an $8.5 billion coronavirus proposal. Schumer has been harshly critical of Trump’s response to the outbreak, and his request – announced before the Democratic-controlled House Appropriations Committee has weighed in – rankled some Democrats hoping for quick, bipartisan action to address the crisis.

      *  *  *

      As we detailed earlier, having already urged the American public to ‘buy the dip’, just before another 900 point drop in the Dow, President Trump has decided to take matters into his own hands – the only way he knows how.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      In a double tweet this morning, Trump announced he will hold a news conference at 6pmET to put the American people straight.,

      “I will be having a News Conference at the White House, on this subject, today at 6:00 P.M. CDC representatives, and others, will be there. Thank you!”

      The reason for his sudden need to address the public (aside from the 2000 points drop in the Dow) is that

      “Low Ratings Fake News MSDNC (Comcast) & CNN are doing everything possible to make the Caronavirus look as bad as possible, including panicking markets, if possible. “

      And responding to Democrats new narrative that The Trump administration is not doing enough, he lashed out:

      “Likewise their incompetent Do Nothing Democrat comrades are all talk, no action. USA in great shape!”

      One thing does make our eyebrows raise a little is the CDC official that raised what is somewhat unprecedented alerts yesterday has an interesting family linkage.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Dr. Nancy Messonnier, the CDC Director of the Center for the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, warned ominously that:

      “As more and more countries experience community spread, successful containment at our borders becomes harder and harder. It’s not a question of if this will happen but when this will happen and how many people in this country will have severe illnesses.

      Disruption to everyday life might be severe…

      …We are asking the American public to prepare for the expectation that this might be bad.”

      In addition, Messonnier warned that it may soon become necessary for schools and businesses to greatly restrict person to person contact…

      The CDC outlined what schools and businesses will likely need to do if the COVID-19 virus becomes an epidemic outbreak in the U.S. Schools should consider dividing students into smaller groups or close and use “internet-based tele-schooling,” Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, told reporters on a conference call.

      “For adults, businesses can replace in-person meetings with video or telephone conferences and increase teleworking options,” Messonnier said.

      Can you ever recall a top CDC official ever making statements this ominous?

      Well, it turns out Dr. Nancy Messonnier is the sister of the former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein who appointed Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

      Could she be part of the resistance?

      Remember, it was reported that CDC employees cried when Trump was elected.


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 20:15

    • "Haven Of Last Resort" – Goldman Sees Gold At $1800 Due To Virus & Bernie Sanders Fears
      “Haven Of Last Resort” – Goldman Sees Gold At $1800 Due To Virus & Bernie Sanders Fears

      Over the past two weeks gold has surged higher, in line with the decline in long-term bond yields and global equity sell-off as new cases off Covid-19 in Europe and the Middle East threaten to curtail global economic activity.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Goldman Sachs suggests there is more to come for precious metals as with rates getting closer to their lower bound, gold looks increasingly like the safest haven.

      Mikhail Sprogis outlines three factors behind continued gains for gold (12m forecast $1800)…

      1) Fear-Driven investment demand

      2) Large global savings glut

      3) The rise of Bernie Sanders

      Gold has outperformed traditional haven currencies, such as the Yen and Swiss Franc, underscoring its status as the safest haven in a world where all currencies are susceptible to a virus-related shock.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      1. This surge in ‘fear-driven’ investment demand has been significantly larger than the consumer demand lost owing to any negative wealth shock to EM consumers as a result of China’s shutdown.

      We estimate that gold purchases fall 2.6% for every 1% hit to Chinese real GDP growth. Therefore, our Economists’ forecast of a 6% contraction in Chinese GDP in Q1 implies only a 28 tonnes loss in gold demand. Adding losses for other East-Asian countries implies a total loss of 40 tonnes. This is small relative to 130 tonnes of additional demand from gold ETFs since January 12. If it continues at this pace total ETF demand could reach 200 tonnes by end of Q1.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The actual increase in gold investments could be up to twice as large owing to non-transparent purchases. Therefore, for gold, the fear-effect from Covid-19 more than offsets any wealth shock as the result of quarantines.

      While the number of new cases in China has been declining, Goldman warns that it is premature to say we are out of the woods yet. The Chinese economy is yet to materially restart and the effects on global supply chains are only now becoming visible.

      Our Strategy team sees risks of further equity downside which should keep volatility high and ETF inflows strong.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      2. Investment demand for gold is further supported by the large global savings glut.

      Household savings in developed markets are at historically high levels while global capex remains depressed creating a shortage of places to invest. Inflows into bond mutual funds and ETFs – a good proxy for retail demand of defensive assets – is at its highest level since 2009. At the same time, supply of government bonds globally is restricted owing to central bank purchases creating a deficit in high quality assets. This supports demand for alternative portfolio diversifiers such as gold.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      We continue to believe that gold remains attractive relative to bonds. It has a greater capacity to increase during the next recession as bonds may be constrained by the lower bound on central bank rates. Gold is also a better hedge against the risk of inflation overshoots.

      Additionally, gold’s share in investor portfolios remains at a very depressed level. The value of gold ETFs relative to the NAV of funds in North America and Europe indicates that the value of gold ETFs is only 0.3%-0.4% of the funds’ NAV and that we are materially below gold’s peak allocation of 2011-2012. As such we see scope for material rotation of investment funds into gold.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      3. Finally, the increase in the probability of Bernie Sanders winning the Democratic nomination could further boost investment demand for gold.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Sanders’ proposed tax hikes could pose risks to equities, and he has proposed a large increase in government spending.

      The last time this happened in the US outside of a recession was during Regan’s stimulus in the 1980s. Gold rallied as market participants became concerned regarding increases in inflation.

      Finally, the proposed wealth tax could incentivize high net worth individuals to buy physical gold bars and store them in a vault, where it is more difficult for governments to reach them.

      Additionally, Morgan Stanley sees more than just safe-haven demand as rising negative yielding debt bring fresh impetus to gold’s price…

      Having fallen through 4Q19, total negative yielding debt has climbed 19%ytd to $13.5tn (Exhibit 1), making holding gold an attractive proposition.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      That’s helped propel total ETF holdings to fresh all-time highs, following inflows of 1.2Moz in Jan-20.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      So, summing it al up, risks to global growth surrounding the virus together with a continued savings glut, depressed real rates, and increased focus on the US election should take the gold price higher by year-end with their new 3, 6 and 12 month forecasts are now $1,700/toz, $1,750/toz and $1,800/toz.

      In the event that the virus effect spreads to Q2, we could see gold top $1800/toz already on a 3 month basis.

      Goldman also increased their 3, 6 and 12m silver forecasts to $18.5/toz, $18.75/toz and $19/toz.


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 20:05

    • CDC Confirms First US Coronavirus Case Of 'Unknown Origin' As South Korea Infections Soar: Live Updates
      CDC Confirms First US Coronavirus Case Of ‘Unknown Origin’ As South Korea Infections Soar: Live Updates

      Summary:

      • South Korea reports 334 new cases, bringing the total number in the country to 1,595

      • South Korea, US postpone joint drills due to coronavirus

      • The US State Department has issued a level 3 travel advisory urging people to reconsider going to South Korea

      • China reports 26 new deaths and 409 additional cases in Hubei province

      • CDC confirms first case of ‘unknown origin’ in US

      • CDC reports 6 new cases among repatriated Americans

      • WaPo reports Northern California has 16th US case, says it’s first of “unknown origin” and risks local spread

      • 83 being monitored in Nassau County

      • Orange County declares state of emergency

      • Norway has confirmed its first case

      • 8 quarantined in Westchester

      • HHS confirms 15th US case

      • Iran deaths hit 19

      • Brazil confirms first case in South America

      • France confirms 2nd death

      • Tokyo pushes back against Tokyo Games cancellation talk

      • Greece confirms first case

      • Germany unleashes fiscal stimulus after confirming new cases

      • Dems one-up Trump with $8.5 billion package.

      • Kuwait, Iraq, Lebanon, Bahrain confirm new cases

      • Finland confirms 2nd case

      • 1st 2 cases reported in Pakistan

      • HHS Secretary tells Congress infectious disease fund has no extra uncommitted cash

      • Congress begins talks on corona virus spending bill with vote expected early next month

      • Germany health minister warns we’re at beginning of epidemic in Germany; 5 new cases

      • Italy confirms 12th death, cases soar above 400

      • North Macedonia confirms first case

      • South Korea cases soar above 1,200 as gov’t begins testing of 200k patients

      • Brazil confirms infected patient came on plane from Paris

      • Ericsson confirms one of its employees in Croatia tested positive

      * * *

      Update (2025ET): Cases in South Korea have exploded higher, with an official report of 334 new cases, bringing the total to 1,595.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The US State Department has issued a level 3 travel advisory urging citizens to reconsider travel to South Korea.

      Meanwhile, China reported an unbelievably low 26 deaths and 409 additional cases in Hubei province.

      * * *

      Update (1950ET): The CDC has confirmed the first US case of “unknown origin”, but they haven’t said where it is.

      • CDC SAYS HAS FIRST U.S. CORONAVIRUS CASE OF UNKOWN ORIGIN

      The announcement, which was scooped by WaPo, follows Trump’s press conference, where he named Mike Pence to be his “Coronavirus Czar” (though Trump made clear he didn’t like that terminology).

      One economist with BankRate.com praised Trump’s performance, saying the appointment of Pence would help the administration clarify the narrative after yesterday’s “bungled messaging.”

      “In naming Vice President Mike Pence as the administration’s point person in charge of the response to the coronavirus outbreak, President Trump attempted to show a concerted effort after bungled messaging. Even so, he couldn’t avoid the opportunity to spend more time at the briefing room lectern instead of letting the experts address health concerns.”

      * * *

      Update (1850ET): Just as President Trump was appointing VP Mike Pence to oversee the US’s virus response, the Washington Post reported that the first US coronavirus case of unknown origin has been reported in Northern California.

      They added that the case is a sign that the virus “may be spreading in a local area.”

      The CDC won’t disclose the exact location of the case, according to the paper.

      Of course…

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      * * *

      Update (1755ET): FoxLA reports that Orange County officials declared a local health emergency Wednesday in response to the coronavirus, which has now infected more than 81,000 people worldwide. Michelle Steel, chair of the county Board of Supervisors, and board Vice Chair Andrew Do made the announcement at an early afternoon news conference.

      Our declaration of local emergency today signed by Dr. Quick is about preparedness. It does not indicate a greater risk of harm, there are no current incidents reported in the county of Orange,” stated Supervisor Andrew Do.

      There has only been one confirmed case of the virus in Orange County, according to county health officer Nichole Quick, that one patient has been treated and is no longer showing signs.

      The Orange County decision follows San Diego County, where officials declared a local emergency in response to the coronavirus on Feb. 14, and San Francisco Mayor London Breed declared a local emergency on Tuesday.

      *  *  *

      Update (1549ET): The tiny kingdom of Bahrain has reported a stunning spike in cases, going from just a handful to 33 in less than 24 hours, according to the country’s health ministry.

      * * *

      Update (1545ET): Workday is reportedly cancelling its internal sales conference, which was expected to draw thousands to Orlando, over coronavirus fears.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      * * *

      Update (1505ET): Norway has confirmed its first case, becoming the latest Scandinavian state to join the corona club.

      After the WHO said Wednesday afternoon in the US that China confirmed 412 cases Wednesday, which was less than the 459 cases confirmed in the rest of the world, here’s what the chart of cases ex-China is looking like.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      * * *

      Update (1435ET): County officials in Westchester have just confirmed that 8 people are under quarantine.

      New York City has reiterated that it has zero confirmed cases.

      * * *

      Update (1430ET): Iraq is taking more steps to protect its fragile economy from the virus, closing schools and universities for 10 days, while banning citizens from traveling to a list of 8 virus-impacted countries, including Iran.

      * * *

      Update (1345ET): If you’re wondering what caused the latest leg lower in stocks, we believe we’ve found the answer: 83 people in Long Island’s Nassau County are being monitored for coronavirus infection, threatening to make the CDC’s warnings about imminent community outbreaks come true.

      The story was initially reported by a local radio station before it was picked up by other local outlets.

      Nassau County Executive Laura Curran told residents “do not panic” at a press conference. Six have been tested so far, five confirmed to not have it.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Nassau health officials say they’re working with both state and federal agencies to monitor the situation. Gov. Cuomo has weighed in on the situation, affirming that only one possible case is still pending after 27 were tested. He added that no matter what happens here, he expects the virus will eventually arrive in NY State. Though an outbreak is inevitable, Cuomo added that there’s “no need for undue fear.” He added that he believed the pending case was in Nassau County.

      Earlier, HHS Secretary Alex Azar confirmed the 15th coronavirus case in the US, while the latest tally from France put the total at 18, up from just a handful yesterday. Germany has also seen a run-up, as we noted earlier, confirming 7 new cases on Thursday as its leading health official declared an “epidemic”, and urged local officials to prepare for a pandemic.

      Meanwhile, five new cases were recently confirmed in Germany, according to Bild, this after Health Minister Spahn gave a stirring warning earlier, part of which we mentioned below: He also confirmed that some infection chains in Germany can’t be tracked. That would bring the total to 23.

      * * * 

      Update (1250ET): A few days ago, the CDC’s Dr. Fauci was on CNBC affirming a WSJ report that human trials for a coronavirus vaccine could enter testing in a matter of months, though we’re likely still at least a year shy of a usable vaccine.

      Now, another FDA official is reportedly claiming that the three-month time-frame for human trials to begin might be a little too optimistic.

      In recent days, the market has found solace in optimistic vaccine headlines. We’re curious to see if that dynamic will continue.

      Over in hte UK, British Airways just announced plans to scrap 22 round-trip flights to Milan.

      * * *

      Update (1235ET): Another twist revealed: The coronavirus case in Croatia is reportedly an Ericsson employee.

      • ERICSSON CONFIRMS ONE OF ITS EMPLOYEES IN CROATIA HAVE TESTED POSITIVE FOR NOVEL CORONAVIRUS

      * * *

      Update (1225ET): Italy has confirmed some new cases.

      • ITALY HAS 400 CONFIRMED VIRUS CASES: EMERGENCY CHIEF

      Back in the US, an FDA official told the press that the situation is “on the cusp” of a pandemic, apparently violating WHO Director General Dr. Tedros’s request that people kindly refrain from using the “P” word.

      • FDA OFFICIAL WARNS CORONAVIRUS ON CUSP OF PANDEMIC

      Meanwhile, over in the Balkans, health officials in North Macedonia has confirmed its first infection in a woman who recently returned from Italy, Reuters reports.

      “The patient tested positive for coronavirus… She is the first patient in North Macedonia to have tested positive for this pathogen,” said Venko Filipce, adding that the patient was in a stable condition. The woman, a Macedonian citizen, reportedly drove from Italy to North Macedonia in a van. All her fellow passengers are being tested. This comes one day after neighboring Croatia reported its first case, someone who had just visited Milan.

      * * *

      Update (1150ET): The CDC has reported six new cases among the group of Americans repatriated from the Diamond Princess and Wuhan, bringing the total to 45, and the total cases in the US to 59.

      Though they couched the information in a weird, opaque way, perhaps to try and blunt the impact the market rally.

      • U.S. CDC SAYS 14 CONFIRMED CASES OF COVID-19 AS OF FEB. 26, 45 CASES AMONG THOSE REPATRIATED TO U.S.

      The good news is that no more cases have been identified among the general public. But it looks like the rally is starting to fade.

      * * *

      Update (1130ET): It’s been another relatively hectic morning for coronavirus-related news in the US. Here are some of the latest updates”

      • Finland has confirmed its second case of coronavirus as the outbreaks spread into northern Europe.
      • Pakistan reports first case, despite closing border with Iran
      • German health minister warns we’re at the beginning of an epidemic, tells hospitals to review planning
      • Brazil is worried about an interruption of medical supplies from China like facemasks (they’re not the only ones)
      • White House weighs appointing coronavirus czar (though the administration has denied)
      • Nice latest town to cancel Carnival celebrations
      • Air China cancels flights between Beijing and Vienna through March 20
      • US issues travel advisory for Iran, warns US citizens of risk of infection on top of kidnapping and detention
      • HHS Secretary Azar tells Congress during testimony on Wednesday that all of the infectious disease rapid response fund is “already committed or obligated”
      • House could vote on coronavirus funding plan during week of March 9
      • Congress begins talks on virus emergency spending bill
      • Delta Air Lines reduces flights between US and Seoul
      • Brazil tracking 20 patients suspected of having the virus
      • Brazil sees number of cases rising in coming days
      • Lebanon health ministry confirms 2nd case
      • Matteo Salvini says Italy should spend €10 billion on coronavirus aid
      • Russia says it will halt issuing visas to Iranian citizens

      The focus remains on Europe and the Middle East now that the number of new cases being confirmed outside China is outbumbering the number of new cases being declared in China (at least according to the ‘official’ numbers).

      * * *

      Update (0940ET): The Brazilian health ministry said the coronavirus patient arrived in Brazil on a plane from Paris. Exactly when isn’t known.

      * * *

      Update (0855ET): In the US, Dems are officially doubling-down on their push to politicize the coronavirus outbreak and use it as a cudgel against President Trump by proposing a plan calling for even more money to be spent.

      According to Fox’s Chad Pergram, Chuck Schumer is planning a $8.5 billion package that he plans to hand over to the appropriations committee later on Wednesday.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      President Trump is holding a press conference later today to discuss the outbreak. Yesterday, he said he would be handing off his administration’s $2.5 billion rescue package to Congress. President Trump has repeatedly insisted that the outbreak is under control, so we suspect that he fears a large number might spur panic.

      Of course, in a situation like this, money can only go so far. As the CDC has demonstrated, containing an outbreak is more about decision-making and hard choices.

      In other news, as we mentioned earlier, Germany is moving to implement some fiscal stimulus of its own.

      * * *

      Update (0750ET): While the Germans oppose closing borders in response to the outbreak in Italy, it appears Berlin has stepped up to rescue the market and placate economists begging them to roll out a fiscal stimulus program to stop the European economy from sliding into the gutter.

      • GERMANY PLANS TO TEMPORARILY SUSPEND LIMIT ON PUBLIC BORROWING

      Futures soared on the headline, which is hardly surprising, as the market has already been primed for German stimulus, even if Berlin has always held the idea at a distance. Back in September, there was all that talk about a “shadow budget”.

      As sentiment plunges, WHO’s Dr. Tedros has stepped in to try and soothe rattled investors, warning that government officials, economists, infectious disease researchers and any self-styled ‘experts’ should avoid using the word ‘pandemic’ to describe the outbreak.

      Yes, while it does technically meet the definition of a pandemic, that word has some seriously negative connotations which Tedros feels isn’t really appropriate here.

      Italy, meanwhile, has reported its 12th death after confirmed cases soared above 300 earlier.

      * * *

      Update (0730ET): The UK has announced plans to start randomly testing citizens with flu-like symptoms for COVID-19. The plan is part of measures to contain the virus as the UK has managed to avoid reporting any new cases over the past week. In England, random testing will take place at 11 hospitals and 100 doctor’s offices.

      “This testing will tell us whether there’s evidence of infection more widespread than we think there is. We don’t think there is at the moment,” Cosford said. He added: “The other thing it will do is, if we do get to the position of more widespread infection across the country, then it will give us early warning that that’s happening.”

      So far, only 13 people have been infected.

      * * *

      Update (0715ET): Abe’s government has officially denied comments made by a senior IOC member who suggested that the Tokyo Games might need to be canceled if the virus is still a threat in late May. IOC member Dick Pound told the AP that “a decision would have to be made by late May” about whether to cancel the games, according to the Washington Post.

      The official position of the Japanese government is that the Games will not be canceled. Besides the obvious blowback for Japan’s already sagging economy and tourism industry, cancelling the games would likely have a serious psychological impact on consumer confidence in the world’s third-largest economy.

      In other Japan news, Hokkaido, a prefecture in the north ofJapan, has urged schools to temporarily close as it struggles to contain the virus after a string of new cases popped up in the area. It was the prefecture’s first order to close schools since the epidemic began.

      * * *

      After cementing its largest two-day percentage drop in two years (going by points, it was the biggest two-day drop ever), stocks fell in Europe Wednesday as France reported its second virus-linked death (and first French national; the first was an 80-year-old Chinese tourist), while Spain confirmed 8 new cases within 24 hours.

      The Frenchman who passed away on Wednesday was one of three new cases confirmed by health authorities.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Over in the US, the CDC warned yesterday that “community spread” of the virus is “inevitable,” while President Trump and his administration continued to insist that everything is fine and that the outbreak in the US would soon die down. We also saw Croatia, Austria and Switzerland report their first cases on Tuesday following the EU health commissioner’s declaration that closing borders would be “disproportionate and ineffective.”

      “We’re talking about a virus that doesn’t respect borders,” said Italy’s Health Minister Roberto Speranza yesterday.

      Are we the only ones who feel that this sounds like justification for closing the border?

      Mirroring the situation on the Canary island of Tenerife, Austrian authorities placed a hotel in the Alpine city of Innsbruck under lockdown after a receptionist (an Italian who had recently visited outbreak epicenter Lombardy) tested positive, according to the Washington Post.

      Just hours after Brazil confirmed the first case in South America, some of its continental neighbors are going on “maximum alert”. Guatemalan President Alejandro Giammattei said the country was battening down the hatches, and that its hospitals are fully stocked and supplied.

      On Wednesday, Greece confirmed its first case in the city of Thessaloniki, while Iran reported 19 new deaths, bringing them, within swinging distance of the 50 deaths that a local lawmaker reported earlier this week. Confirmed cases in the revolutionary Islamic Republic have climbed to 139. According to Al Jazeera, Kuwait confirmed six more cases on Wednesday, bringing its total tally to 18. Bahrain reported three new cases, bringing its national total total to 26 as three women who recently traveled to Iran carried the virus back.

      While European officials largely avoided the heavy-handed tactics used in China, government ministers urged people to avoid all “non-essential” travel as the outbreak spreads across Europe. The mystery at the center of the outbreak in Italy has compounded fears, as the lack of understanding contributes to the hysteria surrounding the outbreak.

      “There is no prohibition,” said Spain’s health minister, Salvador Illa, according to El Pais. “But unless it is essential, do not go to a risk zone. It’s common sense.”

      Rumors circulating around twitter yesterday claimed an official who had met with the Ayatollah only days ago had tested positive for the virus, becoming at least the second government official to catch the virus after the deputy health minister.

      The Hong Kong government said it had been contacted by more than 3,000 Hong Kongers in Hubei Province, including 532 in Wuhan, asking for help getting them back to Hong Kong. In order to return to HK, the government said all Hong Kongers in Hubei must register with the government by Feb. 28.

      Mongolia has become the latest neighbor to tighten its borders and restrict internal travel. The country said it would restrict travel to and from its capital, Ulaanbaatar, to other provinces until March 3. A transportation minister said the country would take precautions with other flights from Europe, Russia Turkey and Kazakhstan. Egyptair has extended its shut-down of flights to China; flights were supposed to resume on Thursday.

      The Philippines, which adopted travel restrictions directed at China, said Wednesday it would also impose travel restrictions on South Korea. The government announced an immediate ban on entry to travelers from North Gyeongsang province, where the coronavirus-hit city of Daegu is located. Japan also announced that it would bar travelers who had visited Daegu or Ceongdo.

      Overnight, South Korea reported 115 more cases, in keeping with its 2-3 daily updates. The new total: 1,261. That number is, of course, expected to climb over the coming days as the country begins the mass-testing of 200,000 people, including members of the cult-like church that’s found itself at the epicenter of the outbreak in Korea.

      Korea also reported that an American soldier was among the 169 cases reported earlier in the day (we noted it late last night).

      Israel has yet to detect the virus within its borders, but another hair-raising revelation came to light Wednesday when South Korea’s CDC confirmed that the Korean Air cabin crew infected with the coronavirus had been on a flight between Israel and Incheon.

      As Shinzo Abe’s government goes all-out to keep the Olympics on track, the PM announced on Wednesday that all major sporting and cultural events in the country taking place over the next two weeks should be postponed or canceled. This comes after the International Olympic Committee said the Olympic Games would go on no matter what, even if the outbreak keeps travelers away, the Japan Times reports.


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 20:00

    • Scientists Discover HIV-Like "Mutation" Which Makes Coronavirus Extremely Infectious
      Scientists Discover HIV-Like “Mutation” Which Makes Coronavirus Extremely Infectious

      While mainstream scientists continue to perform mental gymnastics to insist that the new coronavirus wasn’t man-made, new research from scientists in China and Europe reveal that the disease happens to have an ‘HIV-like mutation’ which allows it to bind with human cells up to 1,000 times stronger than the Sars virus, according to SCMP.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Recall that at the end of January, a team of Indian scientists wrote in a now-retracted, scandalous paper claiming that the coronavirus may have been genetically engineered to incorporate parts of the HIV genome, writing “This uncanny similarity of novel inserts in the 2019- nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature,” meaning – it was unlikely to have occurred naturally.

      Fast forward to new research by a team from Nankai University, which writes that COV-19 has an ‘HIV-like mutation’ that  allows it to quickly enter the human body by binding with a receptor called ACE2 on a cell membrane.

      Other highly contagious viruses, including HIV and Ebola, target an enzyme called furin, which works as a protein activator in the human body. Many proteins are inactive or dormant when they are produced and have to be “cut” at specific points to activate their various functions.

      When looking at the genome sequence of the new coronavirus, Professor Ruan Jishou and his team at Nankai University in Tianjin found a section of mutated genes that did not exist in Sars, but were similar to those found in HIV and Ebola. –SCMP

      “This finding suggests that 2019-nCoV [the new coronavirus] may be significantly different from the Sars coronavirus in the infection pathway,” reads the paper published this month on Chinaxiv.org – a platform used by the Chinese Academy of Sciences which releases research papers prior to peer-review.

      This virus may use the packing mechanisms of other viruses such as HIV,” they added.

      For those confused, what the latest scientific paper claims is that whereas the Coronavirus may indeed contain a specific HIV-like feature that makes it extremely infectious, that was the result of a rather bizarre “mutation.” However, since the scientists did not make the scandalous claim that Chinese scientists had created an airborne version of HIV, but instead blamed a mutation, they will likely not be forced to retract it, even if it the odds of such a “random” mutation taking place naturally are extremely small.

      As a reminder, the running narrative is that the new coronavirus lie dormant in bats somewhere between 20 and 70 years, then ‘crossed over’ to humans through and unknown species – possibly a Pangolinbefore it emerged at a Wuhan, China meat market roughly 900 feet from a level-4 bioweapons lab.

      And what were they researching at said lab? Among other things – why Ebola and HIV can lie dormant in bats without causing diseases.

      According to the new study, the ‘mutation’ can generate a structure known as a cleavage site in the new coronavirus’ spike protein, SCMP reports. “Compared to the Sars’ way of entry, this binding method is “100 to 1,000 times” as efficient, according to the study.

      The virus uses the outreaching spike protein to hook on to the host cell, but normally this protein is inactive. The cleavage site structure’s job is to cheat the human furin protein, so it will cut and activate the spike protein and cause a “direct fusion” of the viral and cellular membranes. –SCMP

      (a recent paper published by Dr. Zhou Peng of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, meanwhile, is “Immunogenicity of the spike glycoprotein  of Bat SARS-like coronavirus.“)

      According to the report, a follow-up study from a Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhn confirmed Nankai University’s findings.

      The mutation could not be found in Sars, Mers or Bat-CoVRaTG13, a bat coronavirus that was considered the original source of the new coronavirus with 96 per cent similarity in genes, it said.

      This could be “the reason why SARS-CoV-2 is more infectious than other coronaviruses”, Li wrote in a paper released on Chinarxiv on Sunday.

      Meanwhile, a study by French scientist Etienne Decroly at Aix-Marseille University, which was published in the scientific journal Antiviral Research on February 10, also found a “furin-like cleavage site” that is absent in similar coronaviruses.

      Chinese scientists speculate that drugs targeting the fuirn enzyme could potentially hinder the virus’ replication inside the human body. Drugs up for consideration include “a series of HIV-1 therapeutic drugs such as Indinavir, Tenofovir Alafenamide, Tenofovir Disoproxil and Dolutegravir and hepatitis C therapeutic drugs including Boceprevir and Telaprevir,” according to Li’s study.

      The conclusion is in line with several reports from doctors who self-administered HIV drugs after testing positive for coronavirus, however there have been no clinical tests to confirm the theory.

      All perfectly “natural.”


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 19:45

    • U.S. Intelligence Is Intervening In The 2020 Election
      U.S. Intelligence Is Intervening In The 2020 Election

      Authored by Jefferson Morley via TruthDig.com,

      President Trump’s ongoing purge of the intelligence community, along with Bernie Sanders’ surge in the Democratic presidential race, has triggered an unprecedented intervention of U.S. intelligence agencies in the U.S. presidential election on factually dubious grounds.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Former CIA director John Brennan sees a “full-blown national security crisis” in President Trump’s latest moves against the intelligence community.

      Brennan charges, “Trump is abetting a Russian covert operation to keep him in office for Moscow’s interests, not America’s.” But congressional representatives, both Democratic and Republican, who heard a briefing by the intelligence community about the 2020 election earlier this month say the case for Russian interference is “overstated.”

      On February 21, it was leaked to the Washington Post that “U.S. officials,” meaning members of the intelligence community, had confidentially briefed Sanders about alleged Russian efforts to help his 2020 presidential campaign.

      Special prosecutor Robert Mueller documented how the Russians intervened on Trump’s behalf in 2016, while finding no evidence of criminal conspiracy. Mueller did not investigate the Russians’ efforts on behalf of Sanders, but the Computational Propaganda Research Project at Oxford University did. In a study of social media generated by the Russia-based Internet Research Agency (IRA), the Oxford analysts found that the IRA initially generated propaganda designed to boost all rivals to Hillary Clinton in 2015. As Trump advanced, they focused almost entirely on motivating Trump supporters and demobilizing black voters. In short, the Russians helped Trump hundreds of thousand times more than they boosted Sanders.

      The leak to the Post, on the eve of the Nevada caucuses, gave the opposite impression: that help for Trump and Sanders was somehow comparable. The insinuation could only have been politically motivated.

      What’s driving the U.S. intelligence community intervention in presidential politics is not just fear of Trump, but fear of losing control of the presidency. From 1947 to 2017, the CIA and other secret agencies sometimes clashed with presidents, especially Presidents Kennedy, Nixon and Carter. But since the end of the Cold War, under Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama, the secret agencies had no such problem.

      Under Trump, the intelligence community has seen a vast loss of influence. Trump is contemptuous of the CIA’s daily briefing. As demonstrated by his pressure campaign on Ukraine, his foreign policies are mostly transactional. Trump is not guided by the policy process or even any consistent doctrine, other than advancing his political and business interests. He’s not someone who is interested in doing business with the intelligence community.

      The intelligence community fears the rise of Sanders for a different reason. The socialist senator rejects the national security ideology that guided the intelligence community in the Cold War and the war on terror. Sanders’ position is increasingly attractive, especially to young voters, and thus increasingly threatening to the former spy chiefs who yearn for a return to the pre-Trump status quo. A Sanders presidency, like a second term for Trump, would thwart that dream. Sanders is not interested in national security business as usual either.

      In the face of Trump’s lawless behavior, and Sanders’ rise, the intelligence community is inserting itself into presidential politics in a way unseen since former CIA director George H.W. Bush occupied the Oval Office. Key to this intervention is the intelligence community’s self-image as a disinterested party in the 2020 election.

      Former House Intelligence Committee chair Jane Harman says Trump’s ongoing purge of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is a threat to those who “speak truth to power.” As the pseudonymous former CIA officer “Alex Finley” tweeted Monday,

      the “‘Deep state’ is actually the group that wants to defend rule of law (and thus gets in the way of those screaming ‘DEEP STATE’ and corrupting for their own gain).”

      Self-image, however, is not the same as reality. When it comes to Trump’s corruption, Brennan and Co. have ample evidence to support their case. But the CIA is simply not credible as a “defender of the rule of law.” The Reagan-Bush Iran-contra conspiracy, the Bush-Cheney torture regime, and the Bush-Obama mass surveillance program demonstrate that the law is a malleable thing for intelligence community leaders. A more realistic take on the 2020 election is that the U.S. intelligence community is not a conspiracy but a self-interested political faction that is seeking to defend its power and policy preferences. The national security faction is not large electorally. It benefits from the official secrecy around its activities. It is assisted by generally sympathetic coverage from major news organizations.

      The problem for Brennan and Co. is that “national security” has lost its power to mobilize public opinion. On both the right and the left, the pronouncements of the intelligence community no longer command popular assent.

      Trump’s acquittal by the Senate in his impeachment trial was one sign. The national security arguments driving the House-passed articles of impeachment were the weakest link in a case that persuaded only one Republican senator to vote for Trump’s removal. Sanders’ success is another sign.

      In the era of endless war, Democratic voters have become skeptical of national security claims – from Iraq’s non-existent weapons of mass destruction, to the notion that torture “works,” to “progress” in Afghanistan, to the supreme importance of Ukraine – because they have so often turned out to be more self-serving than true.

      The prospect of a Trump gaining control of the U.S. intelligence community is scary. So is the intervention of the U.S. intelligence community in presidential politics.


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 19:25

    Digest powered by RSS Digest

    Today’s News 26th February 2020

    • The Nobel Peace Prize Is A Sick Joke
      The Nobel Peace Prize Is A Sick Joke

      Authored by Ben Barbour via Off-Guardian.org,

      The Nobel Peace Prize was founded in 1901 by Alfred Nobel, an arms manufacturer. His family factory first gained notoriety for producing weapons for the Crimean War of 1853-1856. Alfred Nobel invented dynamite and various other powerful explosives. These explosives were used to devastate people in conflicts such as the Spanish-American War.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      After Nobel’s brother died, because of a journalistic error, the public believed that Alfred Nobel had died. In his obituary, he was portrayed as an amoral businessman who made millions of dollars off of the deaths of others. His critics declared that “the merchant of death is dead” and that Alfred Nobel “became rich by finding ways to kill more people faster than ever before.”

      According to Live Science, this discovery shocked Nobel, and to improve his legacy, “one year before he died in 1896, Nobel signed his last will and testament, which set aside the majority of his vast estate to establish the five Nobel Prizes, including one awarded for the pursuit of peace.” This may very well have been a genuine act, but it is important to draw parallels between the origin of the award and its not so peaceful recipients. Here are three of the Nobel Peace Prize winners that turned out to be war criminals.

      HENRY KISSINGER

      Henry Kissinger won the award in 1973 for his “efforts” to conclude the Vietnam War. What a joke. In 1968, Kissinger helped tank President Johnson’s peace talks on behalf of the Nixon campaign for political gain. Kissinger helped orchestrate the secret bombing of Cambodia. These bombing operations were known as Operation Menu and Operation Freedom Deal.

      The carpet bombing of Cambodia led to the deaths of 10,000s, if not 100,000s, of Cambodian civilians. The total death count has been estimated to be as high as 500,000 (most estimates range between 150,000-300,000 deaths). The vast majority of these deaths are considered to be civilians because of the indiscriminate nature of the carpet bombing. These bombings also destabilized Cambodia and allowed for the rise of the genocidal ruler, Pol-Pot. The bombing campaign was so gratuitous that it made Congress pass the War Powers Resolution in 1973, in an attempt to curb the bombing campaign.

      With all of that being said, Kissinger still won the award for his role in the Paris Peace Accords. The peace talks began in 1968, the same year that Kissinger undermined the process to win an election for Nixon. After the agreement was signed in January 1973, it lasted less than two months before full-scale war broke out again in March 1973.

      After winning the award, Henry Kissinger then proceeded to indirectly back Pol Pot’s genocide in Cambodia. This was done primarily as a way to put pressure on the former North Vietnamese Army. Pol-Pot’s genocide killed between 1.5-2 million people (20%-25% of Cambodia’s population).

      Henry Kissinger’s crimes are not limited to Vietnam. He has a long bloody history in Latin America as well. Kissinger was a major proponent of Operation Condor. The highly secretive US-backed campaign enabled South American dictators to kill an estimated 60,000 to 80,000 people. It also led to political imprisonments of over 400,000 people. Transcripts of telephone conversations reveal that after President Allende’s election in 1970, Kissinger began plotting a coup with CIA director Richard Helm. After the 1973 coup in Chile, Kissinger, as Secretary of State, formalized close ties between Pinochet and the United States.

      For years to come, Kissinger proceeded to have close ties with the Chilean dictator, Augusto Pinochet, who killed 1000s of his political opponents and imprisoned and tortured 10,000s more. Pinochet popularized death flights: a practice where people’s stomachs were cut open before they were tossed out of planes into the ocean.

      Kissinger also backed Argentina’s military dictatorship. He was buddy-buddy with Jorge Videla, a dictator who disappeared an estimated 30,000 political dissidents. Videla also tortured political opponents and their families at secret concentration camps. Kissinger encouraged all of this brutality and praised the dictatorship for stamping out “terrorism.”

      Henry Kissinger’s war crimes are far too numerous to neatly fit into one article. For a better understanding of his many war crimes that I left out, I recommend reading The Trail of Henry Kissinger.

      BARACK OBAMA

      In 2009, Barack Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between people.” Before digging into Obama’s war crimes, I would like to add a few caveats. Obama is not exactly like Kissinger.

      On the 2008 campaign trail, Obama did claim that he would meet with adversaries without preconditions. Furthermore, he followed through on this promise in two major ways. He successfully negotiated the Iran Deal and lifted the embargo on Cuba. These are not accomplishments that should be brushed aside. That being said, Obama’s diplomatic achievements are overshadowed by his imperialist failures. I also blame most of Obama’s failures on a lack of conviction in his values and not on any Machiavellian schemes. Most of Obama’s bad foreign policy decisions can be traced back to him getting rolled by people in the military industrial complex establishment like his CIA director John O. Brennan.

      Barack Obama’s most reprehensible policy was his support of the Saudi Arabian-fueled genocide in Yemen. Obama authorized mid-air refueling to refuel Saudi bombers on average twice per day and he set up a Joint Planning Cell to give Saudi intelligence and logistical support to bomb Yemen.

      Obama also approved 10s of billions in arms sales to Saudi Arabia that were used to devastate Yemen’s infrastructure and throw the country into a mass famine.

      In 2016 alone, Obama’s policies led to the deaths of 63,000 Yemeni children. They died from preventable causes overwhelmingly linked to malnutrition. These deaths were caused by the Saudi bombing campaign and the de-facto blockade of humanitarian aid.

      For example, Saudi Arabia, with US backing, bombed the cranes at the port of Hodeidah in August 2015. 70% of all humanitarian assistance to Yemen is channeled through Hodeidah. Bombing the cranes of the major port in this area is a war crime.

      In fact, humanitarian aid groups warned that the US-backed August 2015 bombings would lead to mass child death in Yemen. The Obama administration’s support and aid of these siege warfare tactics was an abhorrent moral failure. It is highly unlikely that the war in Yemen would have even been possible without US support. Neither Saudi Arabia or the UAE had the ability to wage a sustained bombing campaign without outside support from a major imperialist power like the United States.

      Barack Obama also authorized Operation Timber Sycamore, the CIA train-and-equip program in Syria. The multi-billion-dollar program armed and trained fighters to topple Assad. I personally believe that the Syrian conflict is not black and white. There is a lot of blame to go around. In my opinion, both pro-Assad and anti-Assad writers do not tell the entire complex story. Over half a dozen countries helped fuel the proxy war for different reasons, and Assad himself is not simply a victim of Western imperialism.

      Those caveats aside, it is very clear that Timber Sycamore was a terrible idea that led to textbook mutual escalation that broke open the Syrian conflict further and might well be the reason that 100,000s more Syrians died. Billions of dollars were poured into “vetted” rebel groups. Many of these groups turned out to be Salafi jihadist groups and Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups that carried out ethnic murder and various other war crimes.

      Among these groups that received either training or weapons were Ahrar al Sham, Jaysh al Islam, and Nour al-Din al-Zenki, all of whom have been accused of war crimes as per Amnesty International. The massive delivery of BGM-71 TOWs via Timber Sycamore is also sometimes cited (in my opinion correctly) as the policy that caused Russia to intervene in Syria. This is the aforementioned textbook case of mutual escalation.

      Obama also set up a worldwide drone program that Noam Chomsky called “the most extreme terrorist campaign of modern times.” A study done in Afghanistan over a six-month period found that 90% of people killed in US drone strikes were not the intended targets. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism is one resource that has documented the high civilian casualty rate that occurred under Obama’s drone program (and continued and oftentimes increased under Trump’s administration).

      AUNG SAN SUU KYI

      Aung San Suu Kyi won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991 for “her nonviolent struggle for democracy and human rights.” She is currently the State Counsellor (equivalent of prime minister) of Myanmar. State Counsellor Suu Kyi just oversaw one of the largest violent ethnic cleansing projects of the 21st century. It turns out that she fought for human rights and democracy…unless you are a Rohingya Muslim.

      The crackdown on the Rohingya that Suu Kyi oversaw led to a conservative death toll of 10,000 Rohingya. The Myanmar military burned children alive and raped 1000s of Rohingya women. Since 2015, over 900,000 Rohingya have had to flee from Myanmar, mostly into neighboring Bangladesh.

      There have been claims that the ethnic cleansing project may have been a response to violent Rohingya extremist groups that operated in the Rakhine State area of Myanmar. I find this to be plausible given the history of oppression that Rohingya faced and their subsequent insurrections dating back over a half a century.

      However, this certainly does not excuse hacking Rohingya civilians to death with machetes (similar to what the Hutus did to the Tutsis in the Rwandan genocide)

      State Counsellor Suu Kyi denied that an ethnic cleansing project was taking place and she backed the military crackdown. She gave cover for the war criminals in her military by stating “there have been allegations and counter-allegations…We have to listen to all of them.”

      Suu Kyi proceeded to be the figurehead that attacked the International Criminal Court investigations into Myanmar’s ethnic cleansing project as “not in accordance with international law.” She proceeded to run interference for her military’s war crimes at the UN.

      To be clear, as I alluded to above, not all Rohingya are innocent in the conflict. There are credible reports that tie some of the more extremist groups in Rakhine State to outside Saudi funding. But it is a false equivalency used by ethnic cleansing apologists to conflate all the Rohingya in Myanmar with Al Qaeda. Buddhist nationalists used the (likely) correct allegation that worldwide terrorism sponsor Saudi Arabia was funding a couple of Rohingya groups as an excuse to ethnically cleanse an entire population that is mostly peaceful.

      CONCLUSION

      It’s very simple. The Nobel Peace Prize is just like most other awards. Sometimes its distributors get it right and sometimes they get it wrong. The people that win awards do not win them based off of objective score cards about morality. They win these awards based off of media narratives.

      When the Nobel Peace Prize awarded Martin Luther King Jr. with the award, they got it right. When they awarded Henry Kissinger with the award, they exposed themselves to be clowns of the highest order. Do not take awards like the Nobel Peace Prize seriously. They are popularity contests, where oftentimes those that are popular are actually in favor of abhorrent policies.


      Tyler Durden

      Wed, 02/26/2020 – 00:05

    • America's Newest Most Powerful Submarine Has A Stealth Problem 
      America’s Newest Most Powerful Submarine Has A Stealth Problem 

      The Navy’s newest fast-attack submarine was recently spotted with structural damage to its stealth coating after returning from its first deployment, which brings into question the manufacturing process of the shipbuilder, reported Forbes.

      The USS Colorado (SSN 788), a nuclear-powered US Navy Virginia-class attack submarine, was recently photographed with large sections of its stealth coating, known as anechoic coating, missing on its starboard side. The layer is an outer skin, consisting of a sonar-absorbing material that makes the vessel virtually undetectable.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Colorado was launched on March 17, 2018, and this is one of America’s newest and most powerful submarines, already experiencing issues with its outer stealth coating that could make it susceptible to detection by enemy forces.

      The vessel recently returned from deployment in harsh northern waters, traveling approximately 39,000 nautical miles.

      Forbes notes that the US, British, and Russian navies have all had similar problems with stealth skin breaking off during deployments.

      However, Colorado experienced structural damage to its stealth coating on its first deployment, opening up questions surrounding the shipbuilder’s manufacturing process.

      The Trump administration has plowed nearly $2 trillion into the military, and the Navy still can’t figure out a reliable stealth skin for its most advanced nuclear-powered submarines.

      At some point, all this unproductive war spending will bankrupt America. The latest evidence above shows the amount of waste the administration is spending on the military for machines that fall apart in the first deployment.


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 23:45

    • Ron Paul Blasts Trump's Betrayal Of Julian Assange
      Ron Paul Blasts Trump’s Betrayal Of Julian Assange

      Authored by Ron Paul via The Ron Paul Institute for Peace & Prosperity,

      One thing we’ve learned from the Trump Presidency is that the “deep state” is not just some crazy conspiracy theory. For the past three years we’ve seen that deep state launch plot after plot to overturn the election.

      It all started with former CIA director John Brennan’s phony “Intelligence Assessment” of Russian involvement in the 2016 election. It was claimed that all 17 US intelligence agencies agreed that Putin put Trump in office, but we found out later that the report was cooked up by a handful of Brennan’s hand-picked agents.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Via Reuters/The Independent

      Donald Trump upset the Washington apple cart as presidential candidate and in so doing he set elements of the deep state in motion against him.

      One of the things candidate Donald Trump did to paint a deep state target on his back was his repeated praise of Wikileaks, the pro-transparency media organization headed up by Australian journalist Julian Assange. More than 100 times candidate Trump said “I love Wikileaks” on the campaign trail.

      Trump loved it when Wikileaks exposed the criminality of Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party, as it cheated to deprive Bernie Sanders of the Democratic Party nomination. Wikileaks’ release of the DNC emails exposed the deep corruption at the heart of US politics, and as a candidate Trump loved the transparency.

      Then Trump got elected.

      The real tragedy of the Trump presidency is nowhere better demonstrated than in Trump’s 180 degree turn away from Wikileaks and its founder Julian Assange. “I know nothing about Wikileaks,” he said as president. “It’s really not my thing.”

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      US pressure and bribes to the Ecuadorian government ended Assange’s asylum and his seven years in a room at the Ecuadorian embassy in London. After his dramatic arrest by London’s Metropolitan Police last April, he has been effectively tortured in British jails at the behest of the US deep state.

      Starting Monday the 24th of February, Assange faces an extradition hearing in a UK courthouse. The Trump Administration – led by a man who praised Assange’s work – seeks a show trial of Assange worthy of the worst of the Soviet era. The US is seeking a 175 year prison sentence.

      The Trump Administration argues that the Australian Assange should be tried and convicted of espionage against a country of which he is not a citizen. At the same time the Trump Administration argues that the First Amendment does not apply to Assange because he is not an American citizen! So Assange is subject to US law when it comes to publishing information embarrassing to the US deep state but he is not subject to the law of the land – the US Constitution – which protects all journalists and is the backbone of our system of government.

      It is ironic that a President Trump who has been victim of so much deep state meddling has done the deep state’s bidding when it comes to Assange and Wikileaks. President Trump should preempt the inevitable US show trial of Assange by granting the journalist blanket pardon under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

      The deep state Trump is serving by persecuting Assange is the same deep state that continues to plot Trump’s own ouster. Free Assange!


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 23:25

    • Secretive Cult Linked To Coronavirus Outbreak In South Korea Held Meetings In Wuhan
      Secretive Cult Linked To Coronavirus Outbreak In South Korea Held Meetings In Wuhan

      Following reports that a strange Christian cult might be behind the outbreak in Daegu that kickstarted South Korea’s COVID-19 crisis, readers around the world have been curious to learn more details about the Shincheonji Church of Jesus, the small but surprisingly extensive church that follows a man named Lee Man-hee who claims to be the second coming of Jesus Christ.

      Americans will recognize this as a similar concept to the Mormon theology. In South Korea, it’s one of several high-profile Christian cults with a doomsday-oriented philosophy (the leader of the Shincheonji will allegedly take thousands of followers with him to heaven when the world ends).

      But in China, a cult like this is extremely illegal. Yet, somehow, in a state that’s constitutionally athiest, cults like this survive and sometimes flourish as it’s one of the few options that ordinary people have to do something genuinely subversive.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Churches like Shincheonji survive in a sort of tense standoff with the government, with scrutiny coming in waves. Typically, any kind of high profile attention would be bad for the church because it would rouse the authorities. In which case, the story that we’re about to share will likely be very, very bad for the church. But unfortunately for them the cat is already out of the bag.

      he South China Morning Post has learned that the Shincheonji Church of Jesus has a branch in Wuhan, the Chinese city at the epicenter of the COVID-19 outbreak that is rocking the world right now. 

      And the paper has it on good authority that the church’s ~200 members in the city, most of whom are now in quarantine outside Wuhan, continued meeting even after the outbreak started to pick up steam.

      One alleged member, who spoke under condition of anonymity, said in the beginning, nobody took the virus seriously – because authorities said it wasn’t serious.

      “Rumours about a virus began to circulate in November but no one took them seriously,” said one member, a 28-year-old kindergarten teacher.

      “I was in Wuhan in December when our church suspended all gatherings as soon as we learned about [the coronavirus],” said the woman, who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the matter.

      As of Tuesday evening in the US, there were 977 confirmed cases in South Korea, the highest number outside China, as well as  11 deaths. Of the 84 new cases reported on Tuesday, more than half were reported in Daegu.

      A pastor in Hubei province who spoke with SCMP said that Shincheonji church members were especially dedicated, and probably continued their missions to recruit during the outbreak.

      Another alleged member of the church, identified only as a kingergarten teacher in Wuhan, said she was sure the church in Wuhan had nothing to do with the outbreaks in South Korea.

      The Wuhan kindergarten teacher said she was confident that the recent mass outbreaks in South Korea were not linked to Shincheonji church members from the city.

      “I don’t think the virus came from us because none of our brothers and sisters in Wuhan have been infected. I don’t know about members in other places but at least we are clean. None of us have reported sick,” she said.

      “There are so many Chinese travelling to South Korea, it’s quite unfair to pin [the disease] on us.”

      However, she can’t prove this.

      She sidestepped questions on whether church members had travelled from Wuhan to South Korea after the outbreak.

      A spokesman for the church told SCMP that the group has had troubles with the Chinese authorities before, and that they would do anything to avoid any undue scrutiny connected to the virus, which they stressed had nothing to do with the church.

      The teacher said that in 2018 the Wuhan group’s “holy temple” in Hankou district had been raided by police “who branded us a cult,” but members continued to worship in small groups.

      “We are aware of all the negative reporting out there after the outbreak in South Korea, but we do not want to defend ourselves in public because that will create trouble with the government,” she said. “We just want to get through the crisis first.”

      We wonder if Chinese authorities will see things the same way?


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 23:05

    • What Will Americans Do If The Democrats Steal It From Sanders Again?
      What Will Americans Do If The Democrats Steal It From Sanders Again?

      Authored by John Eskow via Counterpunch.org,

       “If Hillary gave up one of her balls and gave it to Obama, he’d have two.”

      –James Carville

      “Well, you know, James Carville is well-known for spouting off his mouth without always knowing what he’s talking about. And I intend to stay focused on fighting for the American people because what they don’t need is 20 more years of performance art on television. And that’s what James Carville and a lot of those folks are expert at … a lot of talk and not getting things done for the American people.”

      –Barack Obama

      This is what they’ve got? James freaking Carville?

      Yes, twelve years after he mismanaged Hillary Clinton’s campaign into a thoroughly delightful but stunningly unlikely defeat, James freaking Carville is the best footsoldier that MSNBC can muster up in the tireless (and tiresome) war they are fighting against Bernie Sanders, against the will of the voters, and against any chance of progressive change in our lifetimes.

      I have no idea how—-or even if—-James Carville is still alive. He seems to be permanently coated in the death-spray of a female praying mantis, some corrosive fluid that’s permeated his brain and turns him more bitter by the millisecond; as you watch him writhe around in his seat among the standard MSBNC crew of failed Democratic Party apparatchiks, Chris Matthews-type mental cases, and ex-CIA bosses with weak-ass gravitas, he seems even more disturbed than the rest of the panel; it seems like he’s about to start consuming his own flesh, live, on national TV.

      (Now, I think I speak for a sizable portion of the American public, of all political stripes, on this one: I wish James Carville hadn’t forced me to consider the issue of Hillary Clinton’s balls. It’s, um, distasteful. But when you delve into Carville’s quotes, you discover that they’re nearly ALL distasteful. While proudly fighting to break that glass ceiling and elect the first female president, for example, he said of Pamela Jones—-one of the women sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton—-“this is what you get when you drag a $100 bill through a trailer park.” The guy seems to have some deep psychosexual issues.)

      The fact that MSBNC is already so desperate to kill the Sanders’ candidacy in its cradle that they’re willing to exhume poor James Carville, dress him up in his least filthy rugby shirt, stick a baseball cap over his skull to keep the children from shrieking, and prop him up to babble at Joy Reid is one more signal that the fix is in. As if we needed it: for months, MSNBC hacks have been saying that Sanders is a Russian plant, an idiot, someone only “racist liberal whites” and “misfit black girls” could like, and-—when all else fails, simply a guy (Jew?) who “makes my flesh crawl.”

      Lets’ spare ourselves months of these subtle, rapier-like rhetorical thrusts and cut, as they say, to the chase: the Democratic Party, with James Carville serving as just one of their low-rent Paul Reveres, is screaming out a warning: it doesn’t matter if Bernie Sanders sweeps all, or most, of the remaining primaries, as he seems certain to do. It doesn’t matter what the plurality of Democrats actually wants: their hopes, their passions, their dreams mean nothing.

      They’re simply not going to let him win.

      Bloomberg, Biden, god help us Klobuchar, the reanimated corpse of Hubert Humphrey: God knows what human form the Party will assume, but it won’t be Bernie Sanders.

      So I find myself wondering how those voters will respond to the brazen theft that we’re about to witness. “What happens to a dream deferred?” asked the poet Langston Hughes. How will the young people of America—-the idealistic anti-Carvilles among us-—react on that day, when they see the last pretense of American democracy stripped away to reveal the huge and reeking meat factory that’s owned and operated by the Mike Bloombergs of this world? What about the older ones among us, lying dormant in cynicism for decades, who’ve dared to awaken to at least a flicker of hope?

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Will this blatant death-blow to democracy send us, at last, into the streets? Will we finally rain hell down on these monsters?

      “Maybe it just sags, like a heavy load,” wrote Hughes, speaking of that dream deferred.

      And that would be the most heartbreaking of outcomes…the outcome that James Carville, and Hillary Clinton, and Chris Matthews, and Joy Reid, and the CIA, and Wall Street, are all calmly expecting, as they lie back, smiling in the absolute certitude that they’re always right…

      “Or does it explode?”


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 22:45

    • Hong Kong Embraces Helicopter Money – Govt Gives Every Adult Citizen HK$10,000
      Hong Kong Embraces Helicopter Money – Govt Gives Every Adult Citizen HK$10,000

      Hong Kong just went full monetary-policy retard.

      In a desperate effort to “do something” about the economic collapse that the region is suffering…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Hong Kong’s Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po is set to unveil a HK120 billion relief deal which includes ‘helicopter money’ – giving every Hong Kong permanent resident over the age of 18 a cash handout of HK$10,000 (around US$1,300) to, reportedly, ease the burden on individuals and companies.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      As SCMP reports,  Chan has been under intense pressure from lawmakers to dose out a heavier aid to help the city ride out of the economic slump – battered by the coronavirus epidemic and months of anti-government protests, sparked by the now-withdrawn extradition bill.

      Hong Kong is suffering an unprecedented slump in consumption, with retail sales having collapsed…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      And as we detailed recently, Sun Hung Kai Properties, which is among Hong Kong’s largest mall owners, said on Wednesday it would reduce February rent by up to 50% for most of its tenants, in an effort to stabilize economy and protect employment.

      Earlier this month, KPMG urged the Hong Kong government to unleash the helicopter money:

      “The Hong Kong government should avoid the temptation to increase taxes or cut expenditures at a time when the city should in fact protect and even step up its domestic support programs,” said John Timpany, partner and head of tax in Hong Kong at KPMG China.

      KPMG went on to propose a series of short and long-term spending measures, including:

      • Giving out HK$10,000 electronic consumption vouchers to permanent residents age 18 and older to promote spending at local businesses.

      • Tax relief measures for local businesses such as deferred payments and partial waivers of provisional tax.

      • Extending rent subsidies for Hong Kong Science Park, Cyberport and other public institutions for six to 12 months.

      • Support to working parents as well as allowance on rental expenses for residences.

      • Boost Hong Kong’s long-term competitiveness by adopting bolder tax incentives and lower rates to attract overseas business.

      “The reserves are meant to prepare Hong Kong for rainy days, and we should use it timely and wisely to weather the storm we are in now,” said Alice Leung, a partner for corporate tax advisory at KPMG China.

      But, the money-drop was first suggested back in December, when the the pro-business Liberal Party proposed that the Hong Kong government should give cash or vouchers to each adult permanent resident in order to stimulate local consumption.

      Last Friday, pan-democrats tabled a non-binding motion in Legco urging the government to include a HK$10,000 cash handout in its HK$30 billion aid package.

      The motion was voted down by Chow and other pro-government lawmakers who said it would delay passage of the funding application for the package.

      And as recently as Sunday, Chan said in a blog post:

      “The government’s resources are finite, it is impossible for this budget to completely satisfy demands from everyone.”

      But, it seems Chan was able to see past that ‘finite-ness’ and the virus scare was just the right crisis not to waste and will dip into the government’s large fiscal reserves of about HK$1.1 trillion to help the city ride out the economic slump.

      The handout will cost HK$71 billion and benefit around 7 million people:

      “I have to emphasise that, although the cash payout scheme involves a huge sum of public money, it is an exceptional measure taken in light of the current unique circumstances and will not, therefore, impose a burden on our long-term fiscal position.”

      Notably, Bloomberg’s Iain Marlow points out that Chan noted he needs to get the approval of the Legislative Council for the “exceptional” cash handout.

      Given that LegCo has been paralyzed as a result of opposition filibustering, I wonder whether it will be delayed or stopped – or whether the pro-democracy camp in Hong Kong will think standing in the way of a cash handout at this time would be political suicide.

      However, Chan says Hong Kong’s economic growth this year will be between negative 1.5 per cent and positive 0.5 per cent.

      “It is hard to be optimistic on this year,” Chan says.

      If the city’s economy contracts this year, it would mean gross domestic product has shrunk two years in a row, something which has not happened since Hong Kong’s return to Chinese rule in 1997.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      So Hong Kong is about to unleash the mother of all stagflations on its people – who were already on the brink of massive social unrest before the virus forced lockdowns. Supply chains have collapsed, therefore there is no supply of goods or services, but demand is about to soar (thanks to free money drops from the government)…What happens to prices we wonder?


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 22:23

    • The Real Meaning Of Red Scare 3.0
      The Real Meaning Of Red Scare 3.0

      Authored by Nicholas Klein via Counterpunch.org,

      The US corporate media, who had such a long run as relative monopolizers of truth, have been discrediting themselves in serial fashion since 9/11. Their lapdoggery to the Bush regime backfired on them during the WMD lie operation and the resulting war of aggression. Then came their participation in the fraudulent business reporting leading up to the 2007-2009 Wall Street crash, and their big lies afterward that “no one could have imagined.” The next big rupture arrived in 2015-2016, their million-minutes spent on preemptive coronations of Trump as one candidate and Clinton as the other, and their responsibility for the unexpected result, which they have tried ever since to blame daily on a vague, ever-present “Russia.”

      In the last few years, it is true that a few million mostly well-meaning people have partaken in the fandom and breaking-news rituals of the Extended Maddowverse. A similar number have bought into the sorry fantasies of Murdochworld, in which a heroic manly Trump is always about to drain the swamp that spawned him. These groups are like the devoted audiences of Game of Thrones or Star Wars, but smaller. Of course it’s a far more serious matter, because they don’t distinguish between their favorite shows and reality, and they are politically influential people, relatively speaking. A third minority, meanwhile, also small if growing, reject both sides of the #Russiagate coin.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Meanwhile 90-95% of everyone else in this country just aren’t following it, don’t know, don’t care. The QAnon Volk call them sheeple, and the committed Hamiltonian liberals of the Russia-Ukrainegate priesthood want to condemn these vulgar Americans for their supposed toleration of Trump’s constitutional outrages. (The latter are the ones who assured that toleration, when they cheered on a ridiculously narrow impeachment, one bound to lose and based on the least atrocious of Trump’s many crimes, and proclaimed that “all roads lead to Russia.”)

      But it’s okay. It is okay that most working people are worried about work and wages and health care and debt, and bills and university and maybe ending the endless wars, and don’t have a fucking clue who Oleg Deripaska or Lev Parnas are. Those people have their priorities straight. Or, at least, their priorities are set more by the realities of having to get by and make a living, and perhaps just a little bit less by flickering shadows on a cave wall.

      In short, the more the corporate media and the mercenary-intellectual complexes (of private “think tanks” and “analysts”) continue to act openly as adjuncts of the alphabet-agencies and assert the hegemony of the new #Russiagate creed (or its flipside, on Fox and Co), the less they are believed.

      The more exposed they are.

      This is a big story: the decline of the corporate media’s power to persuade, an upheaval in what Guy Debord described as the Society of the Spectacle. It is why these outlets have become so fervent in condemning social media, as if people sharing bullshit on Facebook — problematic as it can be, although it should be noted that most of this bullshit is also corporate media product — is somehow inherently more pernicious than the activities of the cable news networks and the pronouncements of their “unnamed sources” at the blood-drenched State Department, Pentagon and natsec agencies.

      The corporate media have effectively joined the campaigns calling for Internet censorship. I don’t know if that will work, given the confluence of crises, the way all the inevitable disasters of capitalism, its wars and its ecocides might allow for sudden new repressive measures. But the corporate media’s credibility keeps setting new lows, and they keep grasping for the same increasingly blunted instrument of blaming the All-American shitshow on Russia. This week, apparently, Russia is why Sanders is winning.


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 22:05

    • Mapping Coronavirus In The Middle East: 9 Countries Hit As Alarm Raised Over Vulnerable Refugee Camps
      Mapping Coronavirus In The Middle East: 9 Countries Hit As Alarm Raised Over Vulnerable Refugee Camps

      Unprepared countries across the Middle East are scrambling to respond as they’ve begun recording more and more coronavirus cases.

      While official government figures across the region likely fall short of the true number — for example hard hit Iran may have already seen 50 deaths according to one lawmaker in the city of Qom despite the Health Ministry denying this high figure and confirming only 12 deaths to date — it’s deeply alarming that Covid-19 has been confirmed in multiple corners of the Middle East, from Egypt to the Gulf to Iran.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Notice also that the United Arab Emirates now has at least 13 confirmed cases, in a worrisome sign in could hit the gulf region hard, given also it’s a major international transport hub straddling east Asia and the West. 

      The WHO is especially concerned of an outbreak among refugee populations in war-torn regions of Iraq and Syria. 

      “Refugees and internally displaced populations across Iraq and Syria have been identified as the most vulnerable groups in the region, should the spread of the virus become a pandemic,” The Guardian reports of recent statements. 

      “Health officials in both countries remain under-equipped to deal with such a a reality that seems more possible with each passing day,” the report added.

      Sprawling and densely packed “tent cities” of refugees along the border areas of Syria remain the most vulnerable. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Refugee camp in northwest Syria, via the AP.

      Official government numbers of infected in the region are as follows:

      • Bahrain (17 cases)  
      • Egypt (1 case) 
      • Iran (61 cases)  
      • Iraq (5 cases)  
      • Israel (2 cases)  
      • Kuwait (3 cases)  
      • Lebanon (1 case)  
      • Oman (4 cases) 
      • UAE (13 cases)

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      The below includes excerpts of Middle East Eye’s brief summary report on confirmed coronavirus cases in each country. 

      * * *

      Bahrain (17 cases)

      Bahrain’s health ministry announced on 25 February that a total of 17 people have been infected with the coronavirus.

      The ministry reported its first case of the coronavirus on 24 February after a “citizen arriving from Iran was suspected of having contracted the virus based on emerging symptoms”…

      Egypt (1 case)

      The WHO confirmed on 19 February that a man identified a week earlier was recovering and no longer a carrier of the illness, but would remain in quarantine for the mandated 14 days. 

      Iran (61 cases, 16 dead)

      Iran is the worst-hit country outside of China, with at least 16 people dead due to the coronavirus. Several countries in the region confirmed their first patients had all previously been in Iran.

      The country’s deputy health minister, tasked with heading the country’s response, was also infected by the virus, a health ministry announcement confirmed on Tuesday 25 February…

      On 24 February, an Iranian MP accused the government of “lying” about the extent of the virus’s spread in Iran, claiming 50 people have been killed by it in the holy city of Qom alone. 

      Iraq (5 cases)

      Iraq confirmed four new cases of the coronavirus on 25 February in an Iraqi family returning from Iran to the city of Kirkuk. 

      Baghdad reported its first case of the coronavirus on 24 February. Health officials said the patient was an Iranian theology student living in the southern city of Najaf. 

      All students studying at the same religious seminary were quarantined, while one of the city’s most important religious sites was temporarily closed to pilgrims while it was disinfected. 

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Israel (2 cases)

      An Israeli woman tested positive for the virus after returning from a heavily affected cruise ship, Israel announced on 21 February. 

      The country later sent 180 South Korean tourists back home and closed travel to and from South Korea. According to Israeli media, the government is considering quarantining another 200 South Koreans at a military base. 

      Kuwait (3 cases)

      The Kuwaiti health ministry reported its first cases of coronavirus on 24 February. 

      In a statement posted on Twitter, the ministry said: “Tests conducted on those coming from the Iranian holy city of Mashhad showed there were three confirmed cases of the coronavirus (COVID-19).”…

      Lebanon (1 case)

      The first confirmed case in Lebanon involved a 45-year-old woman who had travelled from Iran and was quarantined.

      She had arrived on a plane from the Iranian city of Qom, where authorities have said Iran’s outbreak started.  

      Oman (4 cases)

      Oman reported two more cases of coronavirus from individuals who had just travelled to Iran, according to the country’s health ministry Twitter account.  

      The health ministry reported the first two cases of coronavirus infections in the country on 24 February, Oman TV said.

      The two Omani women diagnosed with the illness had visited Iran, it said. They are in a stable condition…

      UAE (13 cases)

      The UAE banned all travel to Iran and Thailand over fears about the spread of the virus, state news agency WAM reported on 24 February. 

      It recorded the first of its 13 cases when four members of a Chinese family were diagnosed on 28 January.


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 21:45

    • No Financing And No Demand: Chinese Refiners Run Into Trouble
      No Financing And No Demand: Chinese Refiners Run Into Trouble

      Authored by Irina Slav via OilPrice.com,

      International banks are suspending credit lines for some independent oil refiners worried about the growing risk of defaults across industries because of the coronavirus epidemic, Reuters reports, citing industry sources.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      According to the sources, at least three private refiners, or teapots, have had credit lines to the tune of $600 million suspended by banks including French Natixis, Dutch ING, and Singapore DBS Group Holdings.

      “All our applications for new open-account credits are frozen … these clean credits are pivotal as we buy 6 to 8 million barrels of oil each month,” one source told Reuters.

      Refiners, both private and state, have already reduced their run rates in response to the slump in fuel demand resulting from the outbreak, and now they have deepened these cuts, Bloomberg reported last week.

      The average as of last Thursday was about 10 million bpd, down by 25 percent on the same time last year, when the average run rates were at a record high of close to 13 million bpd. Analysts expect the low run rates to continue at least until the end of this month, but if it spills into March, some refiners – notably independent refiners – will start experiencing a lack of storage space, too, after earlier this month they took advantage of low prices to stock up on crude.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Now, on top of that, the teapots that have accounted for a large portion of China’s increased thirst for oil that was instrumental in oil price recovery after the crisis, are having financing trouble.

      “We were told by our banks that so long as the open-account credits are for oil heading to Shandong, it will be very hard chance winning approvals,” another Reuters source said.

      The three refiners refused credit line extensions have combined oil import quotas of about 240,000 bpd, Reuters reports. If more banks become wary of defaults among refiners, this could hit imports over a longer term.


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 21:25

    • US Plotted To Assassinate Julian Assange, WikiLeaks Attorney Tells London Court
      US Plotted To Assassinate Julian Assange, WikiLeaks Attorney Tells London Court

      On Monday Julian Assange’s defense team told a London court that the United States plotted to assassinate the WikiLeaks founder

      After describing US intelligence attempts to plant “intrusive and sophisticated” secret surveillance devices in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London where Assange had been living under asylum for seven years, Assange’s attorney Edward Fitzgerald told the court according to an explosive Daily Mail report published Tuesday:

      “There were conversations about whether there should be more extreme measures contemplated, such as kidnapping or poisoning Julian Assange in the embassy.”

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Via Getty Images

      The plot is alleged to have involved a private Spanish security company named UC Global, reportedly acting on behalf of the US authorities, which was engaged in eavesdropping on Assange and his visitors who entered the Ecuadorian embassy to meet privately with him. Officially the firm was in charge of protecting the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

      Prior reports say live-stream audio and video devices were secretly hidden inside the embassy, and supplemented what could be picked up by laser microphones from outside. Court documents detailing UC Global SL’s illegal operation were previously presented to Spain’s High Court.

      The new disturbing allegations which came out during the first day of the WikiLeaks’ founder extradition hearing involved scenarios wherein a “kidnapping” or killing could be made to look like an “accident”

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Fitzgerald made reference to a “Witness Two” who revealed UC Global owner David Morales — a former Spanish military officer — discussed the “extreme measures”. The witness was among a group of whistleblowers who previously came forward to testify against illegal and shady practices of the Spanish security firm.

      Witness Two detailed that Morales “said the Americans were desperate and had even suggested more extreme measures could be applied against the guest to put an end to the situation,” Fitzgerald told the court.

      Fitzgerald read the witness statement in court, which according to The Daily Mail also included the following:

      He said there was a suggestion the embassy door could be left open to make a kidnapping look like it could have been ‘an accident’, adding ‘even the possibility of poisoning had been discussed’

      Giving credence to the newly revealed alleged plot, it must be remembered that in 2017 while Assange was still holed up in the embassy, then CIA Director Mike Pompeo said in a speech before a Washington think tank audience that he deems WikiLeaks a “hostile intelligence service”.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      David Morales, left, owner of Spanish security firm Undercover Global SL. Image source: UC Global/Reuters

      “It is time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is, a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia,” Pompeo said.

      This was widely interpreted as a sign the CIA considered Assange and WikiLeaks members as fair game for assassination or kidnapping, given Pompeo essentially declared them “enemy agents” of the US.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Two years following these remarks, the Spanish-language daily newspaper El País revealed the major surveillance plot targeting Assange while in the embassy:

      Documents and videos revealed by EL PAÍS in July, months before Assange took legal action against Morales, show that UC Global SL spied on the cyber-activist’s conversations with his lawyers, at meetings where they were designing his defense strategy to avoid extradition to the US. Morales allegedly delivered these and other conversations to US intelligence services, this newspaper revealed. Morales was arrested and released pending trial to face charges of violation of client-attorney privilege and illegal arms possession.

      ABC News Australia also days ago published spy footage it obtained from inside the embassy showing:

      “Julian Assange’s conversations, including legally privileged meetings with Australian lawyers Geoffrey Robertson, Jennifer Robinson and Melinda Taylor, [which] were secretly recorded inside his London embassy home.”

      During his last months and years in the embassy, Assange was said to be deeply worried he was being recorded by WikiLeaks’ enemies, at times going so far as to sleep in a tent in his room so his every movement couldn’t be captured. 

      He was rightly paranoid in part because the US and UK have long charged that Assange “put lives at risk” in previously releasing hundreds of thousands of government top secret files related to wars and covert operations especially across the Middle East, which gained international attention. He’s now awaiting potential extradition to the US while under horrible conditions at London’s notorious Belmarsh prison.


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 21:05

    • South Korea Confirms 169 New Cases As Total Surpasses 1,000; China Reports Drop In Deaths
      South Korea Confirms 169 New Cases As Total Surpasses 1,000; China Reports Drop In Deaths

      Update (2045ET): Now that every has apparently accepted that China’s heavy handed quarantine measures worked, even if they won’t come clean with the real numbers, Beijing has reported a sharp drop in deaths, with just 52, the lowest in a single day since the early days of its outbreak disclosures.

      • CHINA REPORTS 52 NEW CORONAVIRUS DEATHS FEB. 25
      • CHINA REPORTS 406 ADDITIONAL CORONAVIRUS CASES FEB. 25

      * * *

      Update (2000ET): South Korea has reported 169 new cases, raising its total to 1,146, while the death toll stood still at 11.

      That’s up from 51 a week ago.

      In other news, three passengers found to have a fever on the flight from Seoul to Nanjing in East China. All 94 passengers have been quarantined, according to Chinese state TV.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      We now await for the latest numbers out of Hubei and mainland China, even as the focus has solidly shifted away from China.

      * * *

      As South Korea confirms another 144 cases during the day on Tuesday to bring the country-wide total to 977, the small East Asian nation has become home to the largest outbreak outside China. The country’s death toll also climbed to 11. The second-highest death toll outside the mainland after only Iran.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

       

       

      On Tuesday, President Moon Jae-in traveled to Daegu, the city where more than half of the country’s cases have been detected, and pledged to avoid the draconian restrictions Chinese authorities implemented in Wuhan, and across Hubei. Though he also advised residents to stay indoors. His comments were accompanied by a warning from the South Korean government advising foreigners to put off travel to the country.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      However, Moon’s bold promises were somewhat blunted by the fact that the government has implemented a containment policy on Daegu, North Gyeongsang Province, according to a party official cited by Yonhap. Other reports claimed South Korea is in the process of drafting a supplemental budget, while Moon has declared Daegu a “special disaster zone.”

      As Daegu sinks into isolation, Korean Air Lines and Asiana Airlines announced they would suspend domestic flights to the city until next month. A Singaporean government minister warned that the city-state could impose sweeping travel restrictions targeting South Korea if the outbreak gets worse. Korean Air also said it’s working with government health authorities to prevent the spread of the virus after a crew member fell sick.

      But in Seoul took on a more morbid tone Tuesday following reports in the local press that a civil servant from the Ministry of Justice’s Emergency Safety Planning Office jumped off a bridge in Seoul at around 5 am local time Tuesday.

      The official was one of several individuals charged with overseeing the government’s response to the virus. As cases soar and hysteria mounts, we suspect this news won’t exactly help quiet the public’s nerves.

      Finally, over in the US, the CDC has upgraded its travel notice for South Korea to “avoid nonessential travel”.


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 20:48

    • After Breaking The Repo Market, JPMorgan Wants To Start Using The Fed's Discount Window Again
      After Breaking The Repo Market, JPMorgan Wants To Start Using The Fed’s Discount Window Again

      Back in 2013, JPMorgan’s billionaire CEO reminded the general public why it hates bankers so much when in response to a simple question from bank analyst Mike Mayo, he answered that’s why I’m richer than you.” Dimon’s arrange aside, nothing in that exchange explained why Dimon is richer not only than Mayo, but 99.9999999% of the US population; the real reason why Dimon was richer than most is that every few years, JPMorgan, now America’s biggest bank, gets a generous taxpayer or Fed bailout even as Dimon claims he never needed that bailout and would have been perfectly ok if unlike his failing peers, he was left to his own devices. He did that in 2008, and he did it again today.

      As a reminder, back in 2008, JPMorgan – alongside most other major US commercial banks – received a $25 billion bailout as part of the TARP program (which was created by current Minneapolis Fed president Neil Kashkari). With the money, JPMorgan, whose fate was inexorably intertwined with that of its its weakest peer and counterparty, would have ceased to exist long ago. However, thanks to the Fed’s generosity which not only did not shutter any bank but rewarded bank CEOs handsomely for blowing up the financial system in 2008, JPMorgan flourished, eventually becoming the largest US commercial bank, and made Jamie Dimon into a billionaire. Of course, being a master at revisionist history, Jamie has repeatedly claimed that he didn’t need the $25BN TARP bailout, and that the bank would have been perfectly ok, but he only took the money under duress and to appear in solidarity with his far more insolvent peers.

      That, of course, is a lie: facing tens of billions in exposure to counterparties that would have liquidated and dragged JPM down with them, Dimon’s bank needed the money as much as anyone, because only if the entire financial system was rescued would every bank survive – there would not be piecemeal winners or survivors. The fact that he not only got the money, but then pretended he didn’t need it – amazingly without any serious pushback – is why Jamie Dimon was “richer than you” for the past decade.

      So fast forward 11 years, when on the 11th anniversary of Lehman’s bankruptcy, the repo crisis shocked Wall Street when on Sept 16, 2019 it suddenly became apparent that despite $1.3 trillion in “excess” deposits, there was not enough liquidity in the system. A month later we were the first to piece together the puzzle, which confirmed that it was JPMorgan’s drain of over $100 billion in repo and money market liquidity that was the precipitating factor for the repo market collapse. In other words, not only did JPMorgan precipitate the repocalypse  (and it’s not just us who make this claim, but other more “reputable” websites and news sources have since joined our clarion call), but with its actions it also triggered the launch of the repo liquidity flood and, a few weeks later, the Fed $60BN in T-Bill purchases, aka QE4. And yes, with JPMorgan stock surging as a result of JPMorgan once again holding the financial system hostage and forcing the Fed to inject hundreds of billions in liquidity, Jamie Dimon just became “even richer than you.”

      But wait, there’s more, because after pretending it had nothing to do with the repo market fiasco or the resultant QE4, the same way it did not need a TARP bailout in 2008, JPMorgan – which singlehandedly forced the Fed’s hand into injecting over $600BN in liquidity in the past 4 months – today said that it planned to borrow funds through the Federal Reserve’s emergency lending facility in “an exercise designed to break the stigma attached to a program that can scare investors and spark political attacks” according to Bloomberg.

      Wait, what? Didn’t JPM just get the benefit of hundreds of billions in repo and QE4 funding? Well, yes, it did… and for the bank’s next trick, it plans to “virtue signal” its way to the funding mechanism that originally started the global financial crisis. Recall that it was speculation, innuendo (and fact) that first Bear and then Lehman, was using tens of billions in discount window liquidity, which helped precipitate a bear raid against the insolvent banks (and which allowed JPMorgan to acquire Bear Stearns for $10/share, up from $2 originally).

      In a moment of brutal hypocrisy, Jennifer Piepszak, JPM’s CFO and the woman who certainly was involved in the bank’s decision to drain repo markets and eventually force the Fed to inject hundreds of billions in repo and QE4 funds, said Tuesday the bank would borrow from the so-called discount window from time to time this year and had discussed the plan with regulators.

      “We think this is an important step for us to take to break the stigma here,” Piepszak, who is also “richer than you”, said during the firm’s investor day in New York, without even a trace of self-referential humor from the bank that has now made repo market access the next big “stigma.” Because while nobody actually cares about the Fed’s tiny discount window which hasn’t been used in over a decade, not a single bank will admit that it is one of the dozens of dealers that submit daily (or term) collateral to the Fed in exchange for emergency liquidity.

      As a reminder, the Fed’s discount window was meant to provide emergency liquidity to banks that otherwise have healthy balance sheets; however after QE1, QE2, QE3 and now QE4 as well as the restart of repo, the discount window fell into disuse as there were far bigger and far more efficient ways to inject liquidity into the system. As a further reminder, in a cash crunch, banks could pledge collateral to the Fed’s discount window in return for cash. Well, they can do the same now… only it’s called repo!

      Meanwhile, when banks still did use the discount window, they become increasingly reluctant to use it because of the reaction it would provoke among investors, who feared it reveals a more serious problem – after all why would a bank need emergency liquidity if it wasn’t in dire strats –  and among politicians keen to attack taxpayer-funded bank bailouts.

      In short, the hypocrisy of JPMorgan truly knows no bounds: after making a mockery of the 2008 bailout, the bank which acquired one of its top peers which imploded after using the discount window, is now thriving thanks to launching QE4 and repo liquidity injections, yet in doing so has shifted the stigma away from the discount window, or any other Fed funding vehicle, and to the Fed’s repo operations.

      As Bloomberg notes, Piepszak’s remarks come less than three weeks after Randal Quarles, the Federal Reserve’s vice chairman for banking supervision, spoke of the need to make it easier for banks to access emergency lending from the Fed.

      “The discount window is meant to be used by healthy banks when it is needed,” Quarles said in a Feb. 6 speech. “While there has long been discussion about how the discount window is ‘broken’ because of stigma about using it, we know it is still an important part of firms’ contingency planning and preparations.”

      Quarles also discussed in his speech how improving access to the discount window could also help enhance money-market liquidity by reducing the demand among banks to hold excess reserves parked at the Fed. That demand contributed to a shortfall of lending by banks into overnight funding markets in September, forcing the Fed to boost reserves with purchases of Treasury bills. By making Treasuries more substitutable for reserves while still meeting liquidity requirements, the thinking goes, Quarles’ plan might encourage banks to hold more Treasuries and fewer reserves. Alternatively, it would merely reincarnate the same stigma that ended the discount window use in the first place.

      Joseph Abate, a money-market strategist at Barclays Plc, wrote in a Feb. 12 note to clients that the Fed could help overcome the long-standing stigma attached to the facility by making it “significantly more attractive” for banks to pledge Treasuries for cash through the discount window.

      Well, of course, but why? After all pledging securities for cash to the Fed is now done via the Fed’s daily or term repo operation, which just like the discount window has stigma associated with it.

      Don’t believe us? Just ask the Fed, or JPMorgan, which banks participate in the Fed’s repo ops, or which banks sell Bills to the Fed as part of QE4. Spoiler alert: the highly confidential answer will never be revealed because it would result in the stigmatization of the associate banks.

      Which simply means that as JPMorgan has now mastered the art of soaking up liquidity from every possible Fed orifice, it is now seeking to distract by pretending that it is willing to use the discount window (even as it aggressively uses repo) ahead of the next crisis.


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 20:45

    • U.S. Car Industry Most Reliant On Chinese Parts
      U.S. Car Industry Most Reliant On Chinese Parts

      As the COVID-19 crisis drags on, the epidemic’s economic impact is starting to be felt around the world. Due to China’s role in the global economy, the prolonged standstill in the country has the potential to disrupt supply chains for several key industries, including electronics, chemicals and automobiles.

      Considering that Wuhan, the outbreak’s epicenter, is often referred to as “China’s Motor City”, Statista’s Felix Richter notes that the automotive sector is among the industries most exposed to the negative impact of the virus. Not only will Chinese production suffer a significant hit due to extended shutdowns, but many manufacturers around the world who rely on Chinese parts are facing production outages.

      “It only takes one missing part to stop a line,” Mike Dunne, an industry consultant formerly heading GM’s operations in Indonesia, told CNN.

      Last week, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) said it would be temporarily halting production at a plant in Kragujevac, Serbia due to a lack of parts from China, while Hyundai and Renault have done the same in South Korea.

      China is among the world’s largest suppliers of car parts, exporting motor vehicle parts and accessories worth $34.8 billion in 2018, according to the UN’s Comtrade database. As the following chart shows, the U.S. car industry is theoretically most at risk of production outages as it relies heavily on parts sourced from China.

      Infographic: U.S. Car Industry Most Reliant on Chinese Parts | Statista

      You will find more infographics at Statista

      It remains to be seen how significant the impact of the epidemic on the global car industry will be, as it depends on how quickly the flow of components from Chinese suppliers can return to the required level. While automakers are gradually reopening factories across the country, those plants located in and around Wuhan remain closed for the time being.


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 20:25

    • How Many Cases Of Covid-19 Will It Take For You To Decide Not To Frequent Public Places?
      How Many Cases Of Covid-19 Will It Take For You To Decide Not To Frequent Public Places?

      Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

      As empty streets and shelves attest, people taking charge of risk has dire economic consequences.

      How many cases of Covid-19 in your community will it take for you to decide not to frequent public places such as cafes, restaurants, theaters, concerts, etc? How many cases in your community will it take for you to decide not to take public transit, Uber/Lyft rides, etc.? How many cases in your community will it take for you to limit going to supermarkets and ask your boss to work at home?

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      One of the most unexamined aspect of the Covid-19 pandemic is the human psychology of risk assessment and fear. The default human response to novel threats such as the Covid-19 virus is denial and abstraction: it can’t happen here, it won’t happen to me, it’s no big deal, etc.

      This careless denial of danger and urgency characterized the official response in China before the epidemic exploded and it characterizes the lackadaisical sloppiness of official response in the U.S.: few facilities have test kits, thousands of people who arrived on U.S. soil on direct flights from Wuhan have not been tested, confirmed carriers have been placed on flights with uninfected people, and the city of Costa Mesa, CA had to file a lawsuit to stop federal agencies from transferring confirmed carriers to dilapidated facilities that are incompatible with thorough quarantine protocols.

      This lackadaisical sloppiness didn’t hinder the spread of the virus in China and it won’t hinder it in the U.S. That means each of us will eventually have to make our own risk assessments and decide to modify our routines and behaviors or not.

      Hence the question: what’s your red line number? Do you stop going out to public places and gatherings when there’s ten confirmed cases in your community, or is your red line number 50 cases? Or is it 100?

      For many people, even a handful of cases will be a tremendous shock because they were unrealistically confident that it can’t happen here. The realization that the virus is active locally and can be spread by people who don’t have any symptoms shatters the comfortable complacency and introduces a chilling reality: what was an abstraction is now real.

      Human psychology is exquisitely attuned to risk once it moves from abstraction to reality. Why take a chance unless absolutely necessary? For many people, the first handful of local cases will be enough to cancel all exposure to optional public gatherings: cafes, bistros, theaters, concerts, etc.

      Many others will decide to forego public transit, taxis and Uber/Lyft rides because who knows if the previous fare was an asymptomatic carrier?

      If you doubt this impulse to over-reaction once abstraction gives way to reality, look at how quickly market shelves are stripped in virus-affected areas. Once we understand what rationalists might declare over-reaction is merely prudence when faced with difficult-to-assess dangers, we realize that there’s a bubble not just in the stock market and Big Tech but in complacency.

      Once a consequential number of people decide to avoid public places and gatherings, streets become empty and all the businesses that depend on optional public mixing–cafes, bistros, restaurants, theaters, music venues, stadiums, etc. etc. etc.– dry up and blow away, even if officials maintain their careless denial of danger and urgency.

      All the jobs in this vast service sector will suddenly be at risk, along with the survival of thousands of small businesses, many of which do not have the resources to survive weeks, much less months, of a sharp decline in business.

      All the official reassurances won’t be worth a bucket of warm spit. After being assured the risk of the virus spreading in North America was “low,” the arrival of the virus will destroy trust in official assurances. People will awaken to the need to control their own risk factors themselves. And as empty streets and shelves attest, people taking charge of risk has dire economic consequences.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      My COVID-19 Pandemic Posts

      *  *  *

      My recent books:

      Audiobook edition now available:
      Will You Be Richer or Poorer?: Profit, Power, and AI in a Traumatized World ($13)
      (Kindle $6.95, print $11.95) Read the first section for free (PDF).

      Pathfinding our Destiny: Preventing the Final Fall of Our Democratic Republic ($6.95 (Kindle), $12 (print), $13.08 ( audiobook): Read the first section for free (PDF).

      The Adventures of the Consulting Philosopher: The Disappearance of Drake $1.29 (Kindle), $8.95 (print); read the first chapters for free (PDF)

      Money and Work Unchained $6.95 (Kindle), $15 (print) Read the first section for free (PDF).

      *  *  *

      If you found value in this content, please join me in seeking solutions by becoming a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com.


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 20:05

    • Watch Live: 'Bloomberg Bashing' Round II At South Carolina Democrat Debate
      Watch Live: ‘Bloomberg Bashing’ Round II At South Carolina Democrat Debate

      After being savaged in the previous Democratic presidential candidate debate, all eyes will be billionaire Mike Bloomberg to see if he can recover tonight and his campaign is definitely coming out swinging as Bernie dominates the pack.

      Seven Democratic presidential candidates qualified for the South Carolina debate:

      Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard did not qualify for the debate stage in South Carolina.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      As Politico reports, after the disastrous first outing – his net favorability rating dropped 20 points in the aftermath, according to Morning Consult – Bloomberg’s debate goals in the Charleston, S.C., debate are twofold:

      1. Persuade viewers that Sanders is too divisive to defeat President Donald Trump in November,

      2. while sidestepping landmines surrounding complaints from women at his private media company and his race-based policing practices as mayor.

      “The debate tomorrow night and the campaign in general … needs to be about one candidate and that’s Bernie Sanders,” Dan Kanninen, a top strategist overseeing Bloomberg’s states operation, said in a conference call with reporters Monday morning.

      “We’ve been saying for some time that the nature of this contest means someone with even a small plurality of delegates can come away with an outsize and disproportionate delegate lead.”

      “We’ve trained our eyes on [Bernie]. Something the rest of the field has failed to do eight debates prior and a year in a campaign,” a top aide said in an interview.

      However, since the last debate, Bloomberg’s odds plummeted as Bernie’s soared…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      But, most worryingly for the DNC et al., the odds of a Trump win have surged in line with Bernie’s rise…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Which makes us wonder if tonight will be different… with the candidates ganging up on Bernie and toeing the establishment line.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Here the five key things to watch in tonight’s debate according to The Hill:

      Sanders is going to come under attack

      Sanders is heading into the debate as the primary race’s nominal front-runner following a near-win in Iowa and back-to-back victories in New Hampshire and Nevada, giving his opponents all the more reason to go on the attack. Already, some campaigns have telegraphed plans to go after Sanders on Tuesday night. Dan Kanninen, an adviser to Bloomberg’s campaign, told reporters on Monday that the debate “needs to be about one candidate and that’s Bernie Sanders.” Meanwhile, Biden has stepped up attacks on the Vermont senator in recent days, launching a digital ad in South Carolina that accused him of plotting to undercut former President Barack Obama. Buttigieg has also shown a willingness to aggressively take on Sanders, using a speech after the Nevada caucuses on Saturday to sharpen contrasts between himself and the senator. All the candidates have a common goal in targeting Sanders: to cast themselves as a leading alternative to a front-runner who some Democrats fear will be a liability to the party if he clinches the nomination. The situation is now viewed as more urgent than ever, especially with Super Tuesday just a week away. Bloomberg’s and Buttigieg’s campaigns have already warned that the March 3 primaries could give Sanders an “insurmountable” delegate lead in the race unless a moderate alternative is able to emerge from the crowded pack.

      Candidates will make appeals to black voters

      South Carolina may be the fourth state to vote in the Democratic nominating contest, but it’s the first in which a majority – about 60 percent – of the Democratic electorate is black. Expect the candidates to make explicit appeals to those voters when they take the stage in Charleston on Tuesday night. For Biden, who has long held a polling edge over his rivals in support among black voters, Tuesday’s debate may be more of a test of whether he can hold onto that support. The former vice president has faced criticism over his past stances on issues affecting black communities – the 1994 crime bill or his opposition to mandatory school busing in the 1970s, for instance – and recent polls suggest his advantage may be fading. He’s also facing competition from billionaire activist Tom Steyer, who has spent heavily in the state and is aggressively courting black voters. Recent polls show the former hedge fund manager with some strength in South Carolina, but he’s also likely to face attacks for his business record, including his past investments in private prisons. For Buttigieg, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), in particular, there’s a sense of urgency to the South Carolina debate. All three have struggled to build strong support among black voters in the Palmetto State, with recent polls showing them lingering in single digits. An NBC News/Marist survey released on Monday showed Warren with 7 percent support among black voters, while Buttigieg and Klobuchar notched 4 percent and 3 percent, respectively. The debate may offer them their last big chance before the primary on Saturday to make a case to those voters.

      Can Warren have a second big night?

      Warren came alive in the Democratic debate in Las Vegas last week, delivering the kind of incisive attacks against Bloomberg and other rivals that many of her supporters had been hoping for for months and fueling a fundraising surge that netted her more than $5 million in the day that followed. The Massachusetts senator is likely to try to recreate that energy on Tuesday night when she takes the debate stage in Charleston. But unlike the Las Vegas debate, the one in South Carolina carries more urgency. She’s running in fourth place in recent polls in the state and Tuesday’s debate offers one of her last chances to improve her standing. One key question is whether – or how aggressively – she’ll go after Sanders. The senators two are longtime allies and both occupy the primary field’s progressive lane. On one hand, attacking Sanders too sharply risks isolating many of the liberal voters that Warren will likely need to succeed in the race. On the other, she hasn’t yet notched any victories in the nominating contest and time is running out for her to show that she can be a competitive candidate.

      Bloomberg gets a chance for a bounce-back

      In the roughly three months since he launched his presidential bid, Bloomberg propelled himself near the top of national polls with a free-spending advertising campaign that cast him as the only candidate capable of taking on President Trump in the 2020 general election. But the image that Bloomberg had spent hundreds of millions of dollars cultivating took a massive hit last week as he struggled to fend off rapid-fire attacks from his rivals on the debate stage in Las Vegas. Throughout the forum, he stumbled through responses, often appearing out of touch and unrepentant for past policy positions. Tuesday night’s debate will give him an opportunity to try to revive his image. Making it even more important for Bloomberg is the fact that Super Tuesday is just a week away. The former New York City mayor declined to compete in the first four primary and caucus states and opted instead to anchor his presidential prospects on a strong showing in the March 3 primary contests. There won’t be another debate for another three weeks, meaning that the forum in Charleston on Tuesday night will be his last chance for a while to show he has what it takes to win.

      How nasty will the attacks get?

      As the race for the Democratic presidential nomination has become more urgent, the candidates’ attacks on one another have grown more bitter and personal, and it appears increasingly likely that that shift may set the tone for Tuesday night’s debate. In his digital ad attacking Sanders as being disloyal to Obama this week, Biden asserted that the Vermont senator “can’t be trusted.” Buttigieg mounted his most explicit attacks yet on the Sanders in a post-Nevada caucuses speech that accused his rival of “ignoring, dismissing, or even attacking the very Democrats we absolutely must send to Capitol Hill.” And that’s not to mention the flurry of attacks that characterized the last debate in Las Vegas. The debate in Charleston may end up being the most hostile yet. Not only will there be more candidates on stage than in Las Vegas, but it may end up being the last debate for some of the candidates, especially those that fall flat in the South Carolina primary or on Super Tuesday. Consequently, it’s possible that the candidates see little downside to getting nasty or personal on Tuesday night.

      The debate, co-hosted by CBS News and the Congressional Black Caucus Institute, will begin at 8 p.m. EST.  Watch Live here…


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 19:50

    • The Grim Reality About Pandemics They Don't Want You To Know: "No Country Is Prepared"
      The Grim Reality About Pandemics They Don’t Want You To Know: “No Country Is Prepared”

      Authored by Sara Tipton via ReadyNutrition.com,

      It’s been 100 years since the Spanish Flu caused a global pandemic. While the WHO would like you to rest easy right now given their belief that Covid-19 is not currently a global pandemic threat, it is just a matter of time before they admit it’s true. And when that day does arrive, “scientists say an outbreak of a flu-like illness could sweep across the planet in 36 hours and kill tens of millions due to our constantly-traveling population.”

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      According to the Daily Mail, “The report, named A World At Risk, said current efforts to prepare for outbreaks in the wake of crises such as Ebola are ‘grossly insufficient’”. It was headed by Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, the former Norwegian prime minister and director-general of the WHO (World Health Organization). He said in the report:

      The threat of a pandemic spreading around the globe is a real one. ‘A quick-moving pathogen has the potential to kill tens of millions of people, disrupt economies and destabilize national security.’”

      No country is fully prepared for the mayhem a pandemic flu can cause

      Out of the entire world, a mere 13 countries had resources and health care systems to put up a fight against a global pandemic. Among the countries ranked in the top tier were Britain, the United States, Australia, Canada, France, and Holland.

      Scientists say that the size of a city and its structure can impact an influenza epidemic, meaning where you live could affect the spread of the virus. Regardless of whether flu cases rise to a wintertime peak or plateau from fall to spring, new research suggests that the size of a city itself is what influences the contours of its flu season according to Science News.  Larger cities with higher levels of crowding were associated with a steady accumulation of influenza cases throughout the flu season. Smaller cities with less crowding tended to have a flu season with a more intense surge in winter, researchers report in the October 5 publication.

      When a highly lethal flu pandemic comes, it will affect everyone alive today. In a related article, “Pandemic flu is apolitical and does not discriminate between rich and poor. Geographical boundaries are meaningless, and it can circle the globe within hours.” Dr. Gupta goes on to explain that when most people hear “flu”, they think of seasonal flu, but pandemic flu is “a different animal, and you should understand the difference.”

      Preparations start at home

      So just how do we prepare for a possible pandemic? A big concern with pandemics is that supplies would be quickly exhausted leaving many unprepared to handle the ordeal. This will only fuel a more chaotic situation. These concerns are not new to most governments and steps have been taken to ensure communities are prepared and are able to contain most epidemics.

      Which such a large-scale emergency, it is difficult to know where to start and the best answer this author can give you is to start at home. We can’t control if or when governments decide to prepare, but we can control when and what we, as individuals need to protect our families.

      This a suggested list of supplies to help you combat a pandemic based on the best-selling book, The Prepper’s Blueprint. The preparedness manual offers real-world advice for preppers of all levels and stages to help gear up for a pandemic.

      The following is a list of pandemic supplies for your home:

      In the event of a pandemic, because of anticipated shortages of supplies, health care professionals and widespread implementation of social distancing techniques, it is expected that the large majority of individuals infected with the pandemic illness will be cared for in the home by family members, friends, and other members of the community – not by trained health care professionals. Bear in mind that persons who are more prone to contracting illnesses include people 65 years and older, children younger than five years old, pregnant women, and people of any age with certain chronic medical conditions.

      In addition to having some necessary supplies on hand, you’ll also want to do the following:

      • Store a one month supply of water and food. During a pandemic, if you cannot get to a store, or if stores are out of supplies, it will be important for you to have extra supplies on hand.

      • Periodically check your regular prescription drugs to ensure a continuous supply in your home.
        Have any nonprescription drugs and other health supplies on hand, including pain relievers, stomach remedies, cough, and cold medicines, fluids with electrolytes, and vitamins.

      • Talk with family members and loved ones about how they would be cared for if they got sick, or what will be needed to care for them in your home.

      • Prepare a sick room for the home to limit family member’s exposure to the virus.

      Brainstorming in advance is a great way to determine where you’d quarantine a family member or create your sick room. Individual preparation is critical if you would like to beat any pandemic and that all starts with brainstorming and coming up with the best ideas to keep yourself and loved ones healthy.

      *  *  *

      This article was originally published at Ready Nutrition™ on November 12th, 2019


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 19:35

    • Brazil Says It Might Have First COVID-19 Case In South America: Live Updates
      Brazil Says It Might Have First COVID-19 Case In South America: Live Updates

      Summary:

      • WHO warns the rest of the world “is not ready for the virus to spread…”

      • CDC warns Americans “should prepare for possible community spread” of virus.

      • San Francisco Mayor declares state of emergency

      • Later, CDC says pandemic not a question of it, but when

      • Brazil may have South America’s first coronavirus case

      • Germany confirms 2nd case on Tuesday, brings total to 17

      • Italy cases spike to 322; deaths hit 10

      • Japan’s Shiseido tesll 8k employees to work from home

      • Kudlow tries to jawbone markets higher

      • HHS Sec. Azar warns US lacks stockpiles of masks

      • Italy Hotel in Lockdown After First Coronavirus Case in Liguria

      • Algeria confirms 1st case

      • First case in Switzerland

      • Kuwait halts all flights to Singapore and Japan

      • Iran confirms 95 cases, 15 deaths

      • First case in Austria

      • Spain reports 7 cases in under 24 hours, including in Madrid, Canary Islands, Barcelona

      • Iran Deputy Health Minister infected with Covid-19

      * * *

      Update (1900ET): We’ve got some (potentially) big news. Brazil’s Health Ministry said a man has tested positive for the coronavirus on in initial test. If it’s confirmed in a second test, it will be the first case in South America.

      The virus has already spread from Asia to Europe, North America, Australia and Africa.

      On that note, El Salvador on Tuesday announced it would prevent entry of people from Italy and South Korea.

      In Spain, a 7th cases has been confirmed in under 24 hours. Just over a day ago, Spain had zero confirmed cases.

      Though it’s unconfirmed, there’s a rumor floating around twitter that an Iranian official who met with the Ayatollah a few days ago has tested positive for the virus.

      * * *

      Update (1750ET): Following reports just a few hours ago claiming Germany had reported its first case of the virus, Europe’s largest economy has just reported its second case, according to domestic media reports.

      The first patient was reportedly a 25-year-old German who recently traveled to Milan. Patient No. 2 was confirmed near Germany’s border with the Netherlands. The man is in critical condition.

      This brings Germany’s total cases to 18.

      Germany’s neighbors Austria and Switzerland confirmed their first cases on Tuesday as the virus spread through Central Europe.

      Over in Japan, Shiseido told 8,000 employees, roughly 30% of the personal-care company’s workforce, to telecommute in keeping with the Japanese government’s push for private employers to keep their workers out of offices and public places. Japanese companies started this more than a week ago, and have since expanded the number of employees affected.

      * * *

      Update (1700ET): SFChronicle reports that Mayor London Breed declared a state of emergency for San Francisco Tuesday, which will ramp up the city’s efforts to prepare for and confront potential cases.

      There have been no confirmed coronavirus cases in San Francisco to date, but “the global picture is changing rapidly, and we need to step-up preparedness,” Breed said in a statement.

      Three people have been treated at San Francisco hospitals for coronavirus, two of which have been discharged, but to date no cases have originated inside the city.

      “We see the virus spreading in new parts of the world every day, and we are taking the necessary steps to protect San Franciscans from harm.”

      This decision follows Santa Clara County, which declared a state of emergency a few weeks ago for similar reasons.

      *  *  *

      Update (1545ET): In keeping with the spate of ominous comments from American government officials, there have been reports about FDA Director Stephen Hahn warning about a shortage of medical supplies like facemasks as the CDC warns that outbreaks in the US are inevitable.

      He made a similar comment yesterday…

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      * * *

      Update (1520ET): Following an intro from HHS’s Alex Azar where he assured the public that the US is expanding its flu-monitoring surveillance system and taking other measures to mitigate the outbreak, a CDC representative attested that its response to the virus started in December following the initial reports.

      The US has pursued a policy of containment, travel restrictions and travel warnings. “We believe those precautions are working.”

      She largely repeated the warnings from earlier, hinting at the possibility of “community-based measures” for infection response that could include quarantines, while the US shifts to a policy of treating mild cases in isolation at home.

      She also reiterated that it’s no longer a question of if a pandemic will happen – it’s a question of when.

      “Our public health system has detected 14 people among the travelers entering the US. The fact that we have been cases at this level is an accomplishment. Based on what we know right now we believe the immediate risk in the US remains ‘low’. But we must use this time to prepare for the event of human transmission in the US. Part of that is educating the public about what transition from emergency measures to community-based measures would look like.

      “Patients with the virus with mild or no symptoms have been placed in medical environments in quarantined. That level of care is mostly not needed. In most cases, the proper care would be management at home, with use of healthcare facilities only permitted for those with other underlying conditions, the elderly and other vulnerable people.”

      “Circumstances suggest the virus will cause a pandemic, if that happens, new strategies will need to be implemented. These interventions at the community level will vary depending on local conditions.”

      “It’s not so much a question of if this will happen, but when, and how many people will become infected, and how many of those will develop a more complicated disease. “

      Well, there you have it…

      After that, Dr. Fauci spoke about the issue of a vaccine.

      Vaccine development began as soon as the virus genome was uploaded to the international database, and that human trials would likely begin within two months. He then explained the painstaking process of drug trials to illustrate why it will take “an additional 6-8 months” just to get the vaccine in circulation within “a year-year-and-a-half”.

      But that’s okay, Dr. Fauci said, because this virus isn’t going away any time soon, and will likely return with next year’s flu season.

      * * *

      Update (1500ET): Germany has confirmed its first case of the virus, a traveler who reportedly came from Milan.

      Maybe they should give the whole ‘keep the borders open’ idea a rethink?

      Meanwhile, HHS is delivering its press conference:

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      * * *

      Update (1445ET): Algeria has confirmed its first case of the virus as the focus on the Middle East intensifies.

      Back in the US, the Dems are on the offensive against President Trump, with Chuck Schumer likening the administration’s purportedly ‘lackluster’ virus response to Chernobyl (we also enjoyed the HBO series, Mr. Senator). Conn. Sen. and wax-faced robot Dick Blumenthal also criticized Trump’s request for Congressional funds as “too little, too late.”

      * * *

      Update (1420ET): Kuwait has halted all flights to Singapore and Japan, according to Al Arabiya, as the paranoia over the outbreak in Iran intensifies, particularly among the GCC member states who barely need an excuse to shit on Iran.

      * * *

      Update (1400ET): Here’s an update on the situation in Iran via the Washington Post.

      Iran has confirmed 95 cases across the country, with at least 15 deaths, as more cases have popped up in Bahrain, the region of Kirkuk in neighboring Iraq, and elsewhere.

      * * *

      Update (1335ET): Like a champion boxer who is just past his prime, Trump economic advisor Larry Kudlow took to CNBC early Tuesday afternoon to try and jawbone the markets higher as US stocks headed for their fourth day in a row.

      Kudlow stressed that the US has been “ahead of the curve” when it comes to “protecting citizens” (by canceling flights, barring foreigners etc.) – even as the CDC warns that the US is dangerously unprepared for “community outbreaks” that it believes will inevitably arrive. People need to stay “calm”, Kudlow said, adding that we won’t really know how bad this will be for the US until a few weeks have passed.

      Kudlow stressed the human toll of the outbreak, calling it “an incredible human tragedy.” But as far as the economy is concerned, “I don’t think we’re looking at an economic disaster at all,” he added.

      To support his claim, Kudlow cited the recent spate of Fed data, claiming there has been “no evidence” of supply disruptions.

      Granted, there have been bright spots, but we can’t help but wonder: Is Kudlow looking at the same data we are?

      And how does one explain gold and the 30-year?

      As far as rate cuts are concerned, Kudlow says “I’m not hearing that.”

      “I’m not hearing the Fed is going to make any panic moves.”

      Notably, Kudlow echoed Fisher’s comments from earlier.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      We can almost hear the bulls shouting ‘Aw, C’mon Larry!’ at their TV screens.

      * * *

      Update (1245ET): More updates out of Europe. Earlier, we reported the first coronavirus cases had been confirmed in Austria and Croatia, showing that the virus has now spread to both central and southeastern Europe.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Over in Italy, the number of confirmed cases has surpassed 300 to 322, while the number of dead climbed to 10, according to Italian emergency chief Angelo Borrelli, who said the newly deceased were over the age of 80. That’s up from just 20 confirmed cases on Friday.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Newly deceased were over 80 years old, says at press conference in Rome Tuesday. The new infections include three cases in southern Sicily region, Italian Civil Protection official Borrelli said.

      Earlier, we noted the WHO saying that while the pace of new infections has slackened in China thanks in part to the administration’s heavy handed crackdown to fight the virus, if officials and the public aren’t careful, we could see a resurgence. The WHO also warned that the world is wildly unprepared for the coronavirus, a fact that the CDC and HHS Secretary have now echoed about America’s ability to respond to the crisis.

      German officials gave the first hint at what is coming earlier today when they said that closing borders with Italy wouldn’t solve the problem (note: this is the same logic they used during the migrant crisis and we all remember how that turned out). Now, European health officials have collectively decided that closing borders would be “ineffective,” concluding days of mounting speculation about whether Italy, or its neighbors, would suspend Schengen rules governing the free movement of people across the EU.

      According to Bloomberg, health ministers from Austria, Croatia, France, Germany, Italy, Slovenia, Switzerland and a representative from San Marino agreed on Tuesday to keep European borders open, arguing that closing them would be a “disproportionate and ineffective measure” at this time.

      * * *

      Before we go, the story of the four-star hotel at Tenerife, a Spanish island where an Italian doctor and his wife who both tested positive for COVID-19, appears to have captured the imagination of the international press.

      According to the BBC, the couple were staying at the H10 Costa Adeje Palace hotel on the island, which is the largest of Spain’s Canary Islands. The doctor tested positive Monday, and his wife the following day. They’ve been placed in isolation at the University Hospital Nuestra Senora de Candelaria.

      But in their wake, an entire hotel with more than 100 guests has been put under quarantine.

      Here’s a still from a video of the residents gazing forlornly at the outside world that was initially shared by the NY Post.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Residents have been told to wait in their rooms as health officials test everyone in the building.

      *  *  *

      Update (1145ET): US CDC says COVID-19 epidemic is rapidly evolving and expanding, warning that a vaccine could be ready in a year, and Americans should prepare for possible spreads in communities.

      “Now is the time for businesses, hospitals, communities, and schools to begin preparing to respond to coronavirus.”

      Nancy Messonnier, the director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said: “As more and more countries experience community spread, successful containment at our borders becomes harder and harder.”

      Additionally, HHS Secretary Alex Azar says at Senate panel hearing that the U.S. doesn’t have enough stockpiles of masks and ventilators to fight the coronavirus and that’s one reason the Trump administration is seeking $2.5b in funding.

      About 30m so-called N95 respirator masks are stockpiled but as many as 300m are needed for healthcare workers, Azar says, adding that his department doesn’t yet know how much they would cost.

      Democratic Sen. Patty Murray, who questioned the administration’s readiness to battle the spread of the virus:

      “I’m deeply concerned we’re way behind the eight ball on this,” Murray said while questioning Azar at the Appropriations subcmte hearing.

      Azar also says the money would be used to help develop vaccines and treatments for the virus and that a vaccine could be ready in a year.

      *  *  *

      Update (1100ET): WHO’s Bruce Aylward told journalists that China’s actions “prevented hundreds of thousands of cases” and warned that the rest of the world “is not ready for the virus to spread,” adding that “countries should instruct citizens now on hygeine.”

      *  *  *

      Update (1001ET): A case of the novel corona virus has been confirmed for the first time in Switzerland. The federal government announced on Tuesday. One person was tested positive for the virus, said those responsible.

      Italian officials stated that the first patient was “obviously infected in Italy,” and will consider further measures if they think “uncontrolled transmission” of the virus is occurring.

      *  *  *

      Update (0950ET): Spanish authorities have confirmed the fourth case of coronavirus in Catalonia, according to La Vanguardia.

      Jordan has banned flights arriving from Italy, becoming the first country in the region to guard against travelers from Europe’s third-largest economy.

      * * *

      Update (0900ET): Iran’s MP Mahmoud Sadeghi said he had tested positive for the coronavirius, telling supporters: “I don’t have a lot of hope of continuing life in this world”.

      CBS has confirmed that it was an Italian doctor visiting the Spanish isle of Tenerife who prompted all guests at his hotel to be confined to their rooms on Tuesday. The country has now confirmed nearly 60 cases on Tuesday.

      In the UAE, home to long-haul carriers Emirates and Etihad, airlines have suspended flights to and from Iran for at least a week, cutting the country’s 80 million people off from thousands of flights.

      Unsurprisingly, the Dems were quick to slam the White House’s $2.5 billion spending plan that was sent lawmakers on Monday to address the deadly coronavirus outbreak. Democrats said the request fell far short of what’s needed.

      House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called the president’s request “long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency” in a statement released Monday. She added that the House would propose a “strong, strategic” funding package of its own to address the public health crisis.

      Because nothing solves a public health crisis like a political stalemate.

      “We have a crisis of coronavirus and President Trump has no plan, no urgency, no understanding of the facts or how to coordinate a response,” said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.

      Trump joked in public remarks Tuesday that if he had authorized more, Chuck Schumer and the rest would be criticizing him, saying “it should be less.”

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      For those who have been watching, CNBC has been talking up a storm about the drugmaker Moderna, which delivered its first experimental coronavirus vaccine for testing, with the clinical trial slated to start in April. The WSJ is supposedly one reason why market’s are clinging to optimism on Tuesday.

      The CDC’s Dr. Fauci praised the development, said “nothing has ever gone that fast.”

      “Going into a Phase One trial within three months of getting the sequence is unquestionably the world indoor record. Nothing has ever gone that fast,” Dr. Fauci said.

      As Jim Cramer won’t stop repeating Tuesday morning, the advances are “really remarkable.”

      Finally, Austrian health officials have confirmed that at least one of the likely coronavirus patients isolated Tuesday was an Italian living in the country.

      This comes after Italian authorities reported the first coronavirus case in the country’s south: a tourist visiting Sicily who had traveled from Bergamo, an Italian city in the Lombardy region.

      * * *

      Update (0825ET): Bahrain has banned its citizens from traveling to Iran as it reports 9 new cases of coronavirus, raising the total cases in the tiny island kingdom to 17 in the span of 24 hours.

      * * *

      Update (0800ET): With his reputation under fire and his popularity slipping, PM Giuseppe Conte said Tuesday that he’s confident that the measures his government has put in place will contain the contagion in the coming days.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      This comes after the PM admitted that a hospital in Lombardy inadvertently helped spread the virus by not adhering to certain health-care protocols. The PM has blamed the hospital for the outbreak in the north, raising questions about whether “the European nation is capable of containing the outbreak,” according to CNN. To put things in perspective, Italy now has 3x the number of cases in Hong Kong.

      “That certainly contributed to the spread,” Conte said, without naming the institution concerned. The infection has been centered around the town of Codogno, around 35 miles south of Milan.

      “Obviously we cannot predict the progress of the virus. It is clear that there has been an outbreak and it has spread from there,” Conte told reporters, referring to the hospital.

      A team of health experts from the World Health Organization and the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control arrived in Italy on Monday to assist local authorities while some 100,000 remain under an effective quarantine.

      Over in India, Trump added to his earlier comments by saying a vaccine is “very close”, even though the most generous estimates claim we need another year.

      Market experts cited a WSJ report on a possible vaccine as helping market sentiment, though even that report made clear that human tests of the drug are not due until the end of April and results not until July or August.

      * * *

      Update (0650ET): It’s not even 7 am in the US, and it looks like a new outbreak is beginning in Central Europe.

      Local news agencies report that Croatia has confirmed its first case, while the Austrian Province of Tyrol has confirmed two cases.

      In South Korea, meanwhile, officials have just confirmed the 11th coronavirus-linked death, a Mongolian man in his mid-30s who had a preexisting liver condition.

      Over in India, where President Trump is in the middle of an important state visit with the newly reelected Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the president struck an optimistic tone once again claiming that the virus will be a “short-term” problem that won’t have a lasting impact on the global economy.

      “I think it’s a problem that’s going to go away,” he said.

      Trump also reportedly told a group of executives gathered in India that the US has “essentially closed the borders” (well, not really) and that “we’re fortunate so far and we think it’s going to remain that way,” according to CNN.

      Meanwhile, SK officials announced they’re aiming to test more than 200,000 members of the Shincheonji Church of Jesus, the “cult-like” church at the center of the outbreak in SK.

      * * *

      Last night, a post written by Paul Joseph Watson highlighted commentary from a Harvard epidemiology professor (we realize we’ve heard from pretty much the whole department at this point in the crisis, but bear with us for a moment) who believes that, at some point, ‘we will all get the coronavirus’.

      Well, up to 70% of us, but you get the idea: The notion that this outbreak is far from over is finally starting to sink in. Stocks are struggling to erase yesterday’s losses, with US futures pointing to an open in the green after the biggest drop in two years. More corporations trashing their guidance, and more research offering a glimpse of the faltering Chinese economy (offering a hint that all the crematoriums are keeping air pollution levels elevated even as coal consumption and travel plunge) have seemingly trampled all over the market’s Fed-ensured optimism.

      And across Europe, the Middle East and the Far East, headlines tied to the outbreak hit at a similarly non-stop pace on Tuesday.

      With so much news, where to start?

      In China, data out of the Transport Ministry revealed that barely one-third of China’s workforce has returned to work, despite state-inspired threats. CNN reported Tuesday that only 30% of small businesses in China have returned to work. The problem? Travel disruption has left millions of migrant workers stranded. There’s also the question of schools: Some cities, including Shanghai, are offering students the option of completing their studies online after March 2.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      China’s rapidly advancing tech sector has responded to the crisis by unleashing a wide range of technologies outfitted for specific tasks, including ferrying supplies to medical workers, fitting drones with thermal cameras and leveraging computer-processing power to aid the search for a vaccine. 

      In a televised interview, one health official said it might take 28 days to safely say an area is free of coronavirus, while another official insisted that “low risk” areas should “resume normal activity” on Tuesday. The government is dividing the country outside Hubei and Beijing into three ‘risk’ tranches, and will mandate that those in the lowest tranche get back to work, school or whatever they were doing before the virus hit.

      Investors are clearly concerned that, instead of the ‘v’-shaped recovery promised by the IMF, the economic bounce-back from the coronavirus might be closer to a “u”-shape. On top of that, as cases proliferate in South Korea, Italy and the US, pundits are beginning to worry that the rest of the world is where China was two months ago – in other words

      Throughout the day, South Korea confirmed 144 more cases, bringing the country-wide total to 977, the highest number outside China.

      As the Korean government warns that foreigners shouldn’t travel there, Korean Air Lines and Asiana Airlines, to South Korean airlines, said they would halt flights to Daegu until next month, leaving the door open to a longer shutdown.

      On Tuesday afternoon, South Korean President Moon Jae-in traveled to Daegu, the city where more than half of the country’s cases have been detected, and advised its residents to stay indoors but pledged to avoid the draconian restrictions Chinese authorities implemented in Wuhan.

      Outbreak-related news in Seoul took on a more morbid tone Tuesday following reports in the local press that a civil servant from the Ministry of Justice’s Emergency Safety Planning Office jumped off a bridge in Seoul at around 5 am local time Tuesday.

      The official was one of several individuals charged with overseeing the government’s response to the virus. As cases soar and hysteria mounts, we suspect this news won’t exactly help quiet the public’s nerves.

      A Singaporean government minister warned that the city-state could impose sweeping travel restrictions targeting South Korea if the outbreak gets worse.

      Minutes ago, Italian authorities confirmed another 8 coronavirus cases, 54 of which have been confirmed on Tuesday, bringing the total to 283. 

      More than 100,000 Italians in 10 villages are under lockdown in the ‘red zone’ in northern Italy, where the military has been deployed and people have been told to stay inside. Fears about the virus spreading throughout the region were validated yesterday when Spain reported a third case, an Italian traveler. On Tuesday, Reuters reports that Spanish authorities have closed the Tenerife Hotel on the Canary Islands and are testing all of its occupants.

      Most of the cases have been recorded in Lombardy (200+), while Veneto, Emilia-Romagna, Piedmont, Bolzano, Trentino and Rome have all confirmed at least one case. The UK government warned that any British travelers in northern Italy should self-isolate, according to the Washington Post.

      In Japan, the “J League”, Japan’s professional soccer league, has announced that it will postpone all games until at least March 15, saying in a statement that it’s “fully committed” to stopping the spread of the coronavirus. The decision followed a government recommendation to cancel all public events and gatherings.

      Embracing a markedly different approach from Beijing, Japan has announced a new policy on Tuesday designed to focus medical care on the most serious cases, while urging people with mild symptoms to treat themselves at home.

      According to the FT, the new strategy of containment announced by a panel overseeing the virus response acknowledged that simply testing everyone potentially exposed to the more than 100 cases outside the ‘Diamond Princess’ would overwhelm its health-care system.

      It is radically different approach from that adopted by China,

      Though it hasn’t announced new cases in a day or so, Japan has confirmed 840 cases of novel coronavirus so far, with nearly 700 of them linked to the ‘Diamond Princess’ cruise ship.

      Iran’s ‘official’ death toll climbed to 14 on Tuesday, with 61 cases confirmed so far. Despite a wave of border closures that left Iran virtually isolated by its neighbors, more cases have started to bleed across the border: Iraqi health ministry officials have confirmed four coronavirus cases in Kirkuk, all of whom are members of a family. He previously looked unwell during a press conference.

      Even more embarrassing for the Iranians than having a local lawmaker expose the horrifyingly real death toll: on Tuesday, the government confirmed that a Deputy Health Minister had been sickened by the virus.

      We suspect we’ll be hearing more bad news from the Middle East as the full scope of the Iranian outbreak becomes more clear.


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 19:21

    • NYC Hotel Loans Defaulting At Alarming Rate As Room-Rates Plunge, Tourism Tumbles
      NYC Hotel Loans Defaulting At Alarming Rate As Room-Rates Plunge, Tourism Tumbles

      More and more New York City hotels are defaulting on their mortgages, signaling an alarming trend in the industry as “challenging market fundamentals” and new supply act as headwinds for the industry. 

      This has resulted in room rates declining and sites like Airbnb gaining traction in the market, according to The Real Deal

      The main metric to watch is the average daily room rate, which has dropped in New York City to its lowest point since at least 2013: $255.16, according to STR. More than 22,000 new hotel rooms remain in the pipeline, as well, which will further add to the supply glut and likely push room rates even lower.

      As a result, loans like a $260 million loan on the Row Hotel near Times Square have been in default. In the case of the Row Hotel, it’s lender is looking to offload the loan on the secondary market for as little as $50 million. Meanwhile, the hotel itself has been on the market since last year, but has little interest from buyers. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Colony Credit, the lender, says there has been a “significant deterioration” in the hotel market and that feedback during the sales process has led them to mark down the value of the loan. 

      In 2019, Heritage Equity Partners defaulted on a $68 million loan for the Williamsburg Hotel. That property is now in the process of heading toward receivership. Lenders to Maefield Development’s hotel at 20 Times Square have also sought to foreclose on $650 million in loans that were made for the project. East West Bank has also moved to foreclose on loans secured by the Selina Chelsea. 

      The Blakely Hotel was shut down altogether last month by its owner, Richard Born, who blamed challenges facing the industry. 

      Finally, there are an additional 21 CMBS mortgages backed by New York hotels that remain under watch for potential difficulties.

      As if the industry wasn’t facing headwinds of its own, it also now has to deal with the backlash of the coronavirus outbreak. We’re guessing that the droves of Chinese tourists usually meandering their way around Manhattan on any given day will likely continue to thin out, as travel restrictions between China and the U.S. remain in place. As we’ve already noted, the virus has already taken its toll on Chinese owned businesses in New York. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Now Wah Tea Parlor’s owner, Wilson Tang, said that on February 3, his restaurant saw an unprecedented 40% drop in business, according to Eater New York. It was a similar story out of critically acclaimed Sichuan restaurant Hwa Yuan, which also saw a steep plunge in sales 2 weeks ago. 

      Tang said: “It sucks. The past couple days suck. We’ve been letting people go early, just to let them take some extra time off. It’s slow in general.”

      Elizabeth Chin, a travel agent in Fort Lee, N.J. told the NY Times“It’s going to be a serious financial burden. The flights are canceled. The tour operators have canceled.”

      Bruce Zhu, the manager of China Tour Travel Services in Flushing, Queens said: “It’s a big problem. We have to cancel the bookings, cancel the hotels. We lose a lot of money on the bookings.”

      “It’s all stopped — zero,” another travel agent in Flushing lamented. 


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 19:15

    • Why Governments Hate Secession
      Why Governments Hate Secession

      Authored by Ryan McMaken via The Mises Institute,

      When the Soviet Union began its collapse in 1989, the world witnessed decentralization and secession on a scale not seen in Europe since the nineteenth century.

      Over the next several years, puppet regimes and states-in-name-only broke away from Soviet domination and formed sovereign states. Some states which had completely ceased to exist—such as the Baltic states—declared independence and became states in the own right. In total, secession and decentralization in this era brought about more than twenty newly independent states.

      This period served as an important reminder that human history is not, in fact, just a story of ever increasing state power and centralization.

      Since then, however, the world has seen very few successful secession movements. A handful of new countries have come into being over the past twenty years, such as East Timor and South Sudan. But in spite of many efforts by separatists worldwide, there have been few changes to the lines on the maps.

      This has certainly been the case in Europe and the Americas, where from Quebec to Scotland to Catalonia to Venice demands for independence have been met with trepidation and sometimes outright threats of violence from central governments.

      Countries Don’t Like to Get Smaller

      This is partly due to the fact state organizations—that is, the people who control them—have little motivation to give up the benefits conferred by bigness. States that control larger geographic areas and larger populations have greater ability to project their power and get more power.

      Greater size means a larger frontier that can act as a physical buffer between the state’s enemies and the state’s economic core. Physical size is also helpful in terms of pursuing self-sufficiency in both energy production and agriculture. More land means greater potential for resource extraction and acreage devoted to food production. From the state’s perspective, these activities are good things because they can be taxed or expropriated.

      In terms of population size, state control over larger populations means more human workers to tax, and, potentially, more highly productive urban workers. Historically at least, larger populations also provided personnel for military uses.

      Thus, states that control large territories and populations are able to directly control larger and more diverse economies within their borders. This means more tax revenue, which in turn means greater military capability. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Naturally, state organizations are not inclined to abandon these advantages lightly, even when secession movement express a desire that they do so.

      Why States Sometimes Get Smaller

      Sometimes, though, states are forced to contract in size and scope. This usually happens when the cost of maintaining the status quo becomes higher than the cost of allowing a region to gain autonomy.

      Historically, the cost of maintaining unity is raised through military means. Examples of this tactic being successfully employed include the cases of the United States, the Republic of Ireland, and some of the successor states of Yugoslavia.

      But secession and decentralization have also often been achieved through bloodless or near bloodless means. This was the case in Iceland and throughout most of the post-Iron Curtain states.

      Bloodless secession movements, however, only occur when the parent state is weakened by larger events beyond the secession movement itself. Iceland, for example, seceded in 1944, when World War II ensured that Denmark was in no position to object. The post-Soviet states seceded when the Soviet state had been rendered impotent by decades of economic decline and (in 1991) a failed coup. Nor is it a coincidence that India gained independence from the United Kingdom in the years immediately following World War II. It is likely the UK could have held on to India through military means indefinitely, but this would have come at a very high cost to the British economy and standard of living.1

      It is possible to envision largely “amicable” separations. The model for this is the separation of Canada, Australia, and New Zealand from the the United Kingdom. But even in these cases, British control over these Commonwealth states’ foreign policy was not totally abandoned until after World War II, when the British state had been weakened by depression and war. Moreover, the British state assumed that these newly independent states would remain highly reliable geopolitical and economic allies indefinitely. Thus, the geopolitical cost of separation was perceived to be low.

      Mega-States Are the Ideal State

      In cases where the seceding state is perceived to have differing cultural, economic, or geopolitical interests—which is true of the overwhelming majority of cases—the parent state is, all else being equal, likely to meet demands for secession with much hostility.

      Although liberal ideology has diminished the perception among much of the world’s population that bigger is better, most government agents—who are by nature decidedly illiberal—see things differently. For them, the ideal state is most certainly a large state.

      Those who delight in the generous application of state violence have noticed that it is not a coincidence the world’s most powerful states—e.g., the US, Russia, China—are those that control large populations, large economic centers, and large geographic areas with sizable frontiers. The combination of these three factors in various configuration ensures that existential threats to the regime are few and far between. Russia’s relatively small economy—only a fraction of the size of Germany’s economy—is mitigated by its enormous geographical frontiers. Its economy is nonetheless large enough to maintain a nuclear arsenal. China’s per capita wealth is quite small, but Chinese territory and the sheer size of its overall economy ensures protection from foreign attack. The US’s enormous economy and its huge ocean frontiers render it essentially immune to all existential threats other than large-scale nuclear war.

      Large states such as these are limited only by the defensive capabilities of other states, and by the threat of domestic unrest and resistance. As Ludwig von Mises noted in Liberalism, states can take only as much power as their populations are willing to give it. There are limits to the public’s generosity.

      Totalitarian States Require Bigness

      This relationship between bigness and state power has been illustrated in the fact totalitarian states are virtually always large states.

      In her book The Origins of Totalitarianism, Hannah Arendt examines a number of nontotalitarian dictatorships that sprang up in Europe before the Second World War. These included (among others) the Baltic states, Hungary, Portugal, and Romania. In many of these cases, Arendt contends the regimes attempted to turn themselves into totalitarian regimes, but failed. This was largely due to their lack of size:

      Although [totalitarian ideology] had served well enough to organize the masses until the movement seized power, the absolute size of the country then forced the would-be totalitarian ruler of masses into the more familiar patterns of class or party dictatorship. The truth is that these countries simply did not control enough human material to allow for total domination and its inherent great losses in population. Without much hope for the conquest of more heavily populated territories, the tyrants in these small countries were forced into a certain old-fashioned moderation lest they lose whatever people they had to rule. This is also why Nazism, up to the outbreak of the war and its expansion over Europe, lagged so far behind its Russian counterpart in consistency and ruthlessness; even the German people were not numerous enough to allow for the full development of this newest form of government. Only if Germany had won the war would she have known a fully developed totalitarian rulership.

      Arendt was not an economist, but had she been one, she might have noted that the necessity of size is so central to totalitarian regimes because they are so economically inefficient. Contrary to promises of machine-like efficiency made by advocates of ever more powerful states, totalitarian states are absurdly wasteful both in terms of capital and human life. The same is true—to varying extents—for all regimes. But as the most centrally-planned ones—whether totalitarian or not—quickly become economic basket cases, large size is necessary. A smaller state would quickly exhaust its capital and its population, and the regime would collapse. Size can provide the appearance of sustainability for longer.

      Cultural factors cannot be ignored, however. Arendt concedes this process of collapse can be drawn out longer in societies that are more ideologically tolerant of it:

      Conversely, the chances for totalitarian rule are frighteningly good in the lands of traditional Oriental despotism, in India and China…

      That region’s relative tolerance for despotism is enabled by local ideologies that foster a “feeling of superfluousness,” which according to Arendt “has been prevalent for centuries in the contempt for the value of human life.”

      Continued Movement toward Smaller States

      Fortunately for humanity, the trend in the world today is toward smaller states. As numerous scholars have noted, the average number of states in the world is larger now than at any other time in recent centuries. Moreover, the rise of global trade has lessened the benefits of imperialism and expanding a state’s frontiers and population. As Mises observed, freedom in trade negates the need for a state to acquire more of the world’s wealth through militaristic or imperialistic methods. States often still seek economic “self-sufficiency,” but the cost of this is so high, and the benefits of open trade so enticing, that more states are willing to accept trade as a substitute for “lebensraum.” This can already be observed, as globalization has allowed small states to thrive, and small states have even acted to force greater discipline on large states through tax competition.

      There are certainly exceptions to this. Some small states, such as North Korea, have maintained an economically isolationist and totalitarian stance—fueled both by internal paranoia and by real perennial threats issued by its enemies (especially the US), in the case of the latter. For the most part, however, the spread of markets (and promarket ideology) has raised the opportunity cost of militaristic expansion from the state’s perspective. If offered the chance to expand at low cost, though, virtually all regimes would take the opportunity in a heartbeat. And this is why we will likely continue to see regimes enthusiastically resist secession within their own borders. States don’t have many opportunities to expand their territories and populations. So they’re not about to sign off on secession lightly. Nevertheless, new economic realities, wars, and demographic shifts may certainly affect the equation in coming years. And then we may again see a redrawing of maps of a sort not seen since the end of the Cold War.


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 18:55

    Digest powered by RSS Digest

    Today’s News 25th February 2020

    • Netanyahu Threatens All-Out War After 90 Rockets Fired From Gaza
      Netanyahu Threatens All-Out War After 90 Rockets Fired From Gaza

      Monday witnessed significant escalation over Gaza as Palestinian Islamic Jihad sought to avenge the deaths of three commanders killed in Israeli air strikes on Gaza and Damascus the day before. 

      Israeli media counted some 90 total rockets fired at Israel from the Gaza Strip throughout the day since the attacks began Sunday night, with the IDF claiming its Iron Dome defense system had intercepted the vast majority which came near populated areas.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Israeli airstrike on Gaza City on Monday, February 24, via AFP/The Times of Israel.

      Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had earlier threatened to initiate broader war if the rocket fire didn’t cease. Despite an Islamic Jihad spokesman announcing a unilateral cease-fire by the early evening, the rocket fire was reported as continuing later into the night Monday. 

      “We are now hitting with planes, tanks, and helicopters,” Netanyahu said while inspecting an Iron Dome unit in the south. “I’m talking about a war,” Netanyahu, who is entering a final week of campaigning before Israeli national elections, had further told Israel’s Army Radio station. “I only go to war as a last option, but we have prepared something you can’t even imagine.”

      He also appeared to threaten to kill the heads of Hamas and Islamic Jihad if the rockets continued, saying:

      “We will continue to strike until the calm returns. If there isn’t quiet, you’ll be next.

      Some 30 rockets were initially fired out of the Gaza Strip on Sunday night, and it continued to escalate through Monday.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      In a developing stand-off, Islamic Jihad appeared to threaten its own continuation and step up of attacks, blaming Israel for not stopping its aggression. 

      “The enemy did not commit itself into stopping its aggression we we resumed based on the fire-for-fire principle,” Islamic Jihad spokesman Abu Hamza, said. 

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Pundits were quick to point the finger at Iran for allegedly supplying increasingly sophisticated rockets to militant groups in the strip, which are reaching deeper into Israel.

      Meanwhile, Israel is reportedly sending tanks, armored vehicles and troops to its southern border in what could become the next round of major fighting at a politically sensitive moment ahead of next week’s election.


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 01:00

    • American Gun Ownership: The Positive Impacts Of Law-Abiding Citizens Owning Firearms
      American Gun Ownership: The Positive Impacts Of Law-Abiding Citizens Owning Firearms

      Authored by Molly Carter via Ammo.com,

      It’s no secret that mainstream press coverage of gun ownership in the United States tends to be in favor of gun control – especially when those reporting on the topic are not firearm owners themselves. Journalists focus on how many people are killed by guns, how many children get their hands on improperly stored firearms, and how many deranged individuals go on shooting sprees.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      This anti-gun news bias is widespread among the “urban elite” who have very little personal experience with guns and yet write for influential newspapers like The New York TimesWashington Post, etc. Despite this bias, law-abiding private citizens owning guns does have positive impacts on American society that often go unreported – many of which are significant.

      Criminals and the Armed Citizen

      Perhaps the most notable impact of gun ownership on American society is how it influences the behavior of criminals.

      The fact is, criminals fear armed citizens more than they do the police. There’s many reasons for this, but here are the most prominent:

      • Police are rarely onsite during a crime.

      • Police are bound by policy and procedures, and are trained to only use their firearms if it’s absolutely necessary.

      • Civilians are also less trained.

      In a research study sponsored by the United States Department of Justice, James Wright and Peter Rossi interviewed over 1,800 incarcerated felons, asking how they felt about civilians and gun ownership. Thirty-three percent of these criminals admitted to being scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by a gun-owning victim. Sixty-nine percent of them knew at least one other criminal who had similar experiences. Nearly 80 percent of felons also claimed that they intentionally avoid victims and homes that they believe may be armed.

      This shows that at least one in three criminals has been deterred because of an armed citizen, and that four out five avoid victimizing people that have guns.

      Law-Abiding Gun Owners & Defensive Gun Use

      Advocates of civilian disarmament tend to scoff at the capabilities of everyday gun owners. Many believe that guns in the hands of normal people are crimes waiting to happen. However, thanks to the research of individuals such as John Lott, we now have evidence showing that gun owners are some of the most law-abiding segments of the American population.

      Lott drew the example of concealed license holders when compared to law enforcement:

      “Concealed-handgun permit holders are also much more law-abiding than the rest of the population. In fact, they are convicted at an even lower rate than police officers. According to a study in Police Quarterly, from 2005 to 2007, police committed 703 crimes annually on average. Of those, there were 113 firearms violations on average.

      With 683,396 full-time law enforcement employees nationwide in 2006, we can infer that there were about 102 crimes by police per 100,000 officers. Among the U.S. population as a whole, the crime rate was 37 times higher than the police crime rate over those years – 3,813 per 100,000 people.”

      Not only are gun owners very law-abiding, they are also quite capable of defending themselves against criminals. Criminologists Dr. Gary Kleck and Dr. Marc Gertz carried out a study that found 2.2 to 2.5 million cases of defensive gun use (DGU). Around 1.5 to 1.9 million of these cases involved handguns. There is reason to believe that DGU numbers completely overshadow the criminal use cases of guns.

      However, in today’s era of outrage politics, many incidents of DGU go under the radar because of their lack of shock appeal that does not make for good headlines.

      A Sense of Security

      Most people realize that law enforcement cannot be everywhere, yet so many rely on nothing but a 911 call to protect both their home and those inside it. For those who live in remote areas, it can take an hour or more for first responders to arrive after an emergency call, but in most cases, even five minutes is too long. But when a homeowner is armed and trained, the sense of security increases.

      Thanks to modern psychology, we know that people need this sense of security in order to grow and develop into healthy adults. Not surprisingly, privately owned guns provide that. Sixty-three percent of Americans now believe that having a gun in the house increases safety. While some may dismiss the importance of feeling secure and safe, or claim that another person’s desire for safety makes them feel unsafe, it is by far the most basic of human needs. And without it, people are left feeling frightened, angry, and defensive – often unable to reach, or even focus on, higher goals.

      Gun Ownership and Public Safety

      Concerning public safety, the media often portrays guns as the primary problem – stating things like, “Guns kill people” or “Guns are not the answer.” But gun control and restrictions are also not the answer. Whenever a community, city, state, or country has imposed a ban on guns, regardless if it was all guns or simply handguns, it has experienced an increase in murder rates. In 1997, Wales and England saw a nearly 50 percent increase in homicides immediately after implementing a ban on handguns.

      Gun control advocates promote the idea that more gun policies and regulations make Americans safer, but it’s naive to believe that any type of law will stop someone set on murder or other criminal activity. The individuals that engage in these types of criminal behaviors do not obey laws, and are therefore rarely impacted by policies and procedures. But these implemented gun control laws do impact the law-abiding citizens who are only trying to protect themselves and those they care about.

      The fact is, widespread gun ownership does reduce crime. Here are some of the ways:

      Home and Business Protection

      Every year, one million American home and business owners utilize a privately owned firearm to protect their property and lives. And when it comes to protection, resisting a crime with a gun is the safest route for victims. It’s associated with lower rates of both victim injury and crime completion than any other victim action.

      American criminals are also less likely to burglarize an occupied home due to fear of the homeowner being armed. In England, where only around four percent of the general population legally own a handgun due to heavy restrictions, 59 percent of homes are occupied when the burglar breaks in, compared to approximately 28 percent in the U.S. Even if the homeowner did own a gun, he or she would have to unlock it from its safe, then unlock another safe where the ammunition is kept, then load the weapon before self defense would be possible. In 2009, 13 years after the country’s handgun ban began, its handgun crime levels had nearly doubled.

      Public Shootings

      After personal and home protection, the biggest impact of gun ownership on American society is mass shootings. Since 1950, all but just over one percent of mass public shootings occurred in gun-free zones. That means perpetrators are likely to know they’re safe and could intentionally be choosing these places to act out their massacres.

      Also, immediately after right to carry concealed laws are put in place, the amount of mass public shootings fall dramatically. Not only does their frequency fall, but because people have the ability to carry firearms, they therefore can stop the perpetrator – limiting the impact of violence and destruction. Within the last two decades, this has happened numerous times across the country, including at a middle school dance in Edinboro, Pennsylvania and the Trolley Square Mall in Salt Lake City, Utah.

      What’s more, when police were interviewed regarding their position on gun control legislation, around 90 percent stated they believed that during an active shooter incident, having well-trained, armed citizens present would decrease the casualties. More than 28 percent agreed that more permissive carry concealed policies would be beneficial to the public, especially when it comes to large-scale public shootings.

      For the counter-argument that states an armed civilian is likely to increase the causalities of a mass shooter incident, there is a risk of this – just as there is an increased risk any time police are involved in a shoot-out. But remember, if there’s an armed shooter, things are already bad. And without interference, things are going to get worse. While the philosophy for protection during one of these situations is always run, hide, fight, if you’re fighting for your life, having a gun on your side is more beneficial than anything else.

      The Exponential Impact

      Because criminals fear citizens with firearms, gun ownership does have a dampening effect on crime. Not only is it a deterrent, but every time an intruder is shot, injured, or captured by a civilian, he or she is less likely to commit another crime.

      Consider this: In 1966, 2,500 women in Orlando, Florida, went through a specific, highly publicized handgun training. Without anything else happening, the prevalence of rapes fell substantially from almost 36 rapes per 100,000 women to four. Other crimes, such as home burglaries, also fell – demonstrating that the private ownership of guns does deter crimes.

      Protecting Constitutional Rights

      In 2014, America saw a switch in how people thought about gun control. For the first time since gun control became an issue, more Americans believed that protecting gun rights was more important than controlling gun ownership, 52 to 46 percent.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      That’s important because according to the U.S. Constitution, the right to bear arms is an inalienable right and an inherent part of the right to life. Once this right is violated by either another individual or the state, the ability to protect oneself from danger and even tyranny is impeded on. And when that happens, the ability of private citizens to protect the Constitution and the rights it enshrines for all Americans is threatened.

      Having the ability to forcefully fight back against a tyrannical leader with guns – not just words – is what gave the colonists the ability to overthrow British control of the American colonies. Without guns, we would not have become the United States of America. The Founding Fathers understood this, and wanted to ensure that future generations of Americans could defend themselves against all threats both foreign and domestic.

      Restraining the Power of Government

      It may seem ridiculous to think that in today’s world, citizens could rise up against the government simply because of privately owned guns. Yet the argument stands that citizens having guns does restrain the power of government. History has shown that when gun restrictions and bans are implemented, it leads to tyranny.

      Here are a few examples:

      • 1911: In Turkey, the Ottoman Empire killed 1.5 million Armenians.

      • 1929: Soviet Union implemented gun control, and after 20 years, killed over 20 million dissidents.

      • 1935: After 17 years of gun control laws, 20 million dissidents were killed in China.

      • 1938: Nazi Germany enacted gun control laws for Jews and by 1945, had murdered 13 million Jewish people.

      • 1956: In just two years after gun control laws were enacted, one million people were killed in Cambodia.

      • 1964: In a nine-year span after gun control, Guatemala killed over 100,000 Mayan Indians.

      • 1970: In Uganda, 300,000 Christians were killed after gun control was implemented.

      • 1994: The government of Rwanda disarmed the Tutsi people, and executed almost one million of them.

      What has the 20th Century shown us about gun control? That an unarmed country is not a safe country. That when citizens don’t have the right to bear arms, governments can and do grow too large and become a threat to their people. That in the 20th Century, governments murdered four times as many people as those that were killed in all the world’s wars during that same time period. That millions more people were killed by their own governments than by criminals.

      Truth Behind the Anti-Gun Rhetoric

      Arguments in support of the anti-gun campaign can seem strong. After all, they talk about gun control saving the lives of children, stopping school shootings, and putting an end to terrorist attacks. But the fact is, this is just rhetoric and much of it is exaggerated and skewed.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Here’s the truth behind the most common anti-gun arguments, especially when it comes to individual and public safety.

      Suicide

      Yes, civilian-owned guns often play a role in suicides. And yes, gun control policies do seem to lower the prevalence of gun suicides. But gun control does not impact the number of people who commit suicide nor the total number that occur. Research shows that when guns are not available, those intent on hurting themselves find other, just as fatal ways to do it. More gun regulation does not lessen these numbers.

      43 to One

      A favorite statistic used by those in favor of gun control is that when a person has a gun in the home, he or she is 43 times more likely to shoot and kill a family member than an intruder. This statistic is based off of one study done in Seattle in 1986. Shooting of a family member included firearm murders, suicides, and fatal accidents and was compared to court-ruled justifiable homicides.

      Of these 43 deaths, most were suicides. As already discussed, gun restrictions do not impact the number of suicides. Eliminate these deaths from the numbers, and it drops to 2.39 deaths to one.

      Now, of those 2.39 family deaths, some are accidents and some are murders. Just like the absence of guns doesn’t reduce the risk of suicide, when someone is bent on murder, chances are he or she is going to follow through regardless if it’s with a firearm, a knife, poison, or other means.

      Lastly, these are deaths compared to deaths, and when discussing self defense and protecting both yourself and home, it often doesn’t lead to death. Wielding a firearm alone is enough to turn many criminals away. And many who use a firearm in self defense shoot to injure, not kill. The study also didn’t account for those cases when a homeowner was acquitted on grounds of self-defense. Therefore, this number represents the number of dead criminals, not those that were captured or deterred.

      So what does this mean for America? It means that guns and the law-abiding citizens who carry them make and keep it a safer country. It means when a criminal knows you’re carrying a firearm, you’re less likely to become a victim. It means that there are positive benefits of gun ownership for Americans and that gun legislation is not the best way to safer streets.

      *  *  *

      *If you know that someone in your home is severely depressed or having suicidal idealizations, access to firearms should be completely restricted. This is also true for knives, ropes, and all medications – including those that can be purchased over the counter. Seek medical assistance as soon as possible.


      Tyler Durden

      Tue, 02/25/2020 – 00:10

    • Meet Naomi Seibt – The 19-Year-Old, Blond Antidote To Greta Thunberg
      Meet Naomi Seibt – The 19-Year-Old, Blond Antidote To Greta Thunberg

      In what is a somewhat shocking lead article, the Washington Post has written a feature on Naomi Seibt, a German climate skeptic and YouTuber that WaPo describes as “…19-year-old German who, like Greta, is blond, eloquent and European.”

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      WaPo introduces the teen:

      Naomi denounces “climate alarmism,” calls climate consciousness “a despicably anti-human ideology,” and has even deployed Greta’s now famous “How dare you?” line to take on the mainstream German media.

      Of course, there is a reason why WaPo decided to show Naomi to the world… to set the narrative – that she is a climate-denying, right-wing racist…

      In addition to climate change, Naomi echoes far-right skepticism about feminism and immigration.

      The German media have described her as sympathetic to the nationalist Alternative for Germany (AfD), the biggest opposition party in parliament, whose leaders have spoken of fighting “an invasion of foreigners.”

      Naomi says she is not a member of AfD – she describes herself as libertarian – but acknowledges speaking at a recent AfD event.

      Seibt was interviewed by Sky News Australia last week to discuss her story.

      “What the climate skeptics, or climate realists say, makes a lot of sense to me, scientifically,” Seibt said in the interview.

      “And that’s how I became really passionate about the topic.”

      I think this entire climate mainstream narrative is not about science at all. Because I would say that more than 90% of the people, especially the young people, who go to those Fridays for Future protests, they have no clue what they’re actually talking about. They don’t know anything about the science behind it. All they know is, this is the mainstream, and they are actually scared many of them I think that the planet is going to end like 12 years from now. And so, this is not about science. This is about politics. This is about controlling us.

      As WaPo reports, Naomi said her political activism was sparked a few years ago when she began asking questions in school about Germany’s liberal immigration policies. She said the backlash from teachers and other students hardened her skepticism about mainstream German thinking. More recently, she said that watching young people joining weekly “Fridays For Future” protests inspired by Greta helped spur her opposition to climate change activism.

      “I get chills when I see those young people, especially at Fridays for Future. They are screaming and shouting and they’re generally terrified,” she said in an interview.

      “They don’t want the world to end.”

      Later this week, Naomi is set to make her American debut at the Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC, a high-profile annual gathering just outside Washington of right-leaning activists.

      “She’s a fantastic voice for free markets and for climate realism,” James Taylor, director of the Arthur B Robinson Centre for Climate and Environmental Policy at The Heartland Institute, told The Washington Post


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 23:50

    • How To Know If America Is Your Enemy
      How To Know If America Is Your Enemy

      Authored by Eric Zuesse via The Strategic Culture Foundation,

      If your country is friendly toward Russia, China, or Iran, then today’s American Government is probably applying subversion, economic sanctions, or maybe even planning a coup, or (if none of those will succeed) probably is war-gaming now for a possible military invasion and permanent military occupation, of your country.

      These things have been done to Russia, Iran, China, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Cuba, Ukraine, Georgia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, and some other countries.

      However, after the 9/11 attacks in America, the U.S. Government has added another system for selecting countries to immiserate, and those are mainly the countries that already suffer the most misery – some of them are countries that were listed above, but others (many others) are not, and are selected instead largely because they are already in misery, and also because America – that is, the Deep State which controls it, America’s hundreds of billionaires, who control international corporations and the press in America, and not just control the politicians who win public offices – wants to control the given target country in order to extract its natural resources or simply in order to place some of U.S. military bases there so as to be better able to invade other countries.

      This relatively new category of America’s targeted enemies was invented, mainly, in 2003 and 2004, by Thomas P. M. Barnett, a Professor at the U.S. Naval College and columnist and writer for various popular magazines, as well as of best-selling books. His 2004 book The Pentagon’s New Map, presents that map, to show the areas, mainly around the Equator and including all of Central America; plus all of South America except Chile, Argentina, and Brazil; plus all of Africa except South Africa, all countries of which are supposedly not connected to globalization — i.e., they are Third World instead of First World — and he says that they are unstable and therefore need to be policed by the world’s policeman, which is the U.S. Government, to serve there as the judge, jury, and executioner, of anyone who lives there and who resists that judge, jury, and executioner. His key statement is on page 227,

      “A country’s potential to warrant a U.S. military response is inversely related to its globalization connectivity.”

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Here is the map, which shows which countries are supposedly high globalization connectivity and therefore inappropriate for America to sanction, coup, or invade and occupy; and which countries are supposedly low globalization connectivity and therefore appropriate for America to sanction, coup, or invade and occupy:

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      http://archive.is/2Pjqp

      As can be seen there, the following countries are not to be policed by the U.S. Government: Canada, U.S., Mexico, Chile, Argentina, Brazil, UK, Greenland, Iceland, EU, Switzerland, Ukraine, Georgia, South Africa, Russia, Mongolia, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Australia, N.Z.

      He calls those the “Globalized Functioning Core.”

      All others are “the Non-Integrated Gap” countries, America’s virtual free-fire zones, to control so as to ‘prevent terrorism’.

      Instead of international law being what the United Nations says it is, this “new map” theory says that international law in the “Non-Integrated Gap” countries should be what the U.S. Government says it is.

      According to Barnett’s theory, as he expressed it in its original version in an Esquire magazine article titled “Why the Pentagon Changes Its Maps: And why we’ll keep going to war,” he listed these countries as “THE GAP” or third-world countries, “My list of real trouble for the world in the 1990s, today, and tomorrow, starting in our own backyard” (and these are listed here by the names that he gave to them): Haiti, Colombia, Brazil and Argentina, Former Yugoslavia, Congo and Rwanda/Burundi, Angola, South Africa, Israel-Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Somalia, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, North Korea, Indonesia. Then he listed “CORE MEMBERS I WORRY WE MAY LOSE:” China, Russia, India.

      So, if you live in any of those countries, then Barnett, and the many U.S. generals who respect his theory, and the U.S. billionaires, who want the resources in those countries or else just want military bases there, view you as an enemy, not as a citizen of a sovereign foreign country. His Esquire article says, “it is always possible to fall off this bandwagon called globalization. And when you do, bloodshed will follow. If you are lucky, so will American troops.” He assumes that you need a “policeman” from America because what your own country provides is too primitive. And, “Conversely, if a country is largely functioning within globalization, we tend not to have to send our forces there to restore order or eradicate threats.”

      On 22 August 2017, Thierry Meyssan at Voltairenet headlined “The US military project for the world” and gave his progressive critical interpretation of Barnett’s theory by placing it into the long-term evolution of U.S. geostrategy. On 26 September 2004, Razib Khan gave his admiring racist-fascist or ideologically nazi interpretation of it, under the headline “IQ And The Non-Integrating Gap”. He assumed there that lower-income countries are “lower IQ” and therefore need to be directed according to the master’s whip, not as sovereign countries.

      The book’s publisher places online an informative excerpt from the work. under the headline “An Operating Theory of the World” and Barnett says there:

      As the “vision guy,” my job was to generate and deliver a compelling brief that would mobilize the Defense Department toward generating the future fighting force demanded by the post-9/11 strategic environment. Over the next two years I gave that brief well over a hundred times to several thousand Defense Department officials. Through this intense give-and-take, my material grew far beyond my original inputs to include the insider logic driving all of the major policy decisions promulgated by the department’s senior leadership. Over time, senior military officials began citing the brief as a Rosetta stone for the Bush Administration’s new national security strategy.

      The strategy remains in force, though there now is a return to focusing on the main enemies being Russia, China, and Iran. The “gap” countries are currently viewed not only according to the “gap” but also according to their relationships to Russia, China, and Iran.


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 23:30

    • Uncertainty Surrounds Fate Of 2020 Tokyo Games As Covid-19 Outbreak Broadens
      Uncertainty Surrounds Fate Of 2020 Tokyo Games As Covid-19 Outbreak Broadens

      The 2020 Tokyo Summer Olympics are scheduled to begin on July 24, and with about five months to go before the games start, the Covid-19 outbreak continues to worsen, with rising risks the Olympics could be delayed or canceled, reported The Times.

      As of February 24, the deadly virus has infected more than 79,524, killed 2,626 and prompted more than 50 countries and territories to close their borders with China. The virus has spread uncontrollably in South Korea, Japan, and now in Europe, with cases, ex-China increasing.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Japan has the second-highest confirmed cases, with a total of 838 cases including four deaths, most of them are from a cruise ship docked in Yokohama, Japan.

      Japanese public broadcaster NHK reported that Tokyo Olympic organizing committee CEO Toshiro Muto recently said he was “extremely worried that the spread of the infectious disease could throw cold water on the momentum toward the Games.”

      Tokyo 2020 President Yoshiro Mori said last week, “we are not considering a cancelation or postponement of the Games—let me make that clear.”

      However, Dr. Hitoshi Oshitani, a professor of virology at Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine in Sendai, warned that the Olympics couldn’t take place tomorrow, considering the outbreak situation continues to worsen. 

      “I’m not sure of the situation at the end of July,” Oshitani said. He said it would be “difficult to have the Olympics (now).” 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      With an expanding list of Tokyo events being postponed ahead of the Olympics, it suggests some form of disruption could be seen in the months ahead.

      Unpaid volunteer training for the event has been delayed until May or even weeks before the event. Organizers acknowledge the games cannot operate without these volunteers.

      The Tokyo Marathon on March 1 will exclude hundreds of elite runners for fear they may contract the deadly airborne virus.

      Some Olympic qualifying events outside of Tokyo have been shifted to different regions or postponed until further notice.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      On Monday, the first board meeting for the Milan-Cortina 2026 Olympics committee opted for a video conference call after an outbreak of the virus prompted several towns in northern Italy to close.

      Some sporting events in Italy are being held behind closed doors: “Playing all sports behind closed doors for the next week could be possible, because then fans can more easily stay at home,” said Maurizio Casasco, the president of the Italian federation for sports physicians

      This could suggest as the crisis spreads across the world, the 2020 Olympic games might not be canceled, delayed, or relocated this summer, but rather a closed event that will be televised.

      Since 1896, the Olympics have only been canceled during wartime. And in 1976, 1980 and 1984 faced boycotts.

      The longer the outbreak continues, the more uncertainty it could create for Olympic organizers.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      But there’s good news for Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, if whatever reason the event is canceled or at least closed off to the public, his administration can blame the collapsing economy on the virus.


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 23:10

    • Sabotaging Kabul's Multipolar Revolution With China And Russia
      Sabotaging Kabul’s Multipolar Revolution With China And Russia

      Authored by Federico Pieraccini via The Strategic Culture Foundation,

      Nineteen years after September 11, 2001 and 17 years after launching its war against the Taliban in Afghanistan, the U.S. seems ready to cut a deal with the Taliban in order to freeze out its Eurasian rivals.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The central government in Kabul has in recent years granted a leading role to Moscow and Beijing in efforts to pacify the country by bringing all parties to the negotiating table. A successful outcome would allow Afghanistan to reap the benefits of its geographical position vis-a-vis Sino-Russian infrastructure projects.

      The entry into Afghanistan’s dynamics of China’s economic power and Russia’s military weight promises to spark a multipolar revolution in the country and beyond that would spread to neighbors like India, Pakistan and Iran.

      Moscow had even initiated historical negotiations with Taliban representatives, culminating in a visit to Moscow. U.S. sources at the time voiced doubts about the success of any peace plan and tensions between the U.S. and Iran were high, with sanctions imposed on Iran and pressure placed on U.S. allies in the region like India to boycott Iranian oil.

      Moscow and Beijing must have seen it as opportune to renew extended talks on Afghanistan that included regional countries but excluded the U.S.

      Washington’s countermove took place shortly thereafter, calling into service the Taliban, an old geopolitical tool of theirs. This faction of Afghan politics served as a handy expedient to justify Washington’s initial invasion of Afghanistan and will now be employed to obviate Washington’s exclusion from any peace accords.

      The CIA wielded the Taliban as a weapon against the USSR, arming and supporting it since the 1980s. The blowback from this strategy came 20 years later with the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 that was carried out by al Qaeda with the Taliban regime in Afghanistan giving them aid and comfort, or so the State Department has officially been telling us.

      As geopolitics never gets boring, Washington will now, 20 years after entering the country, try and use an agreement with the Taliban to scupper the regional plans of Kabul, Moscow and Beijing as well as to justify its continued existence in the country.

      The Taliban (influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood, whose military strength lies in Turkey and economic strength in Qatar) entering into negotiations with the U.S. means betraying its initial determination to remove any foreign presence in Afghanistan. But this has not stopped it from unofficially negotiating with Washington in Qatar for more than a year.

      Washington’s primary goal is to remain in the country militarily in order to position itself in what is a geopolitically strategic location, the intention always being to slow down the integration and economic union of Eurasia, in the knowledge that Afghanistan is a central pivot both for China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Russia’s North-South corridor to connect Moscow and New Delhi. Afghanistan is also the gateway and intersection between North Africa, the Middle East, the Persian Gulf and South Asia.

      It is therefore not surprising that Afghanistan is a country that attracts great-power competition involving the likes of the U.S., Russia, India and China.

      Washington’s deal with the Taliban may be based on the avowed need to fight against the terrorist threat posed by ISIS. We must pause for a moment to point out that the presence of ISIS in Afghanistan is quite recent, leading to all sorts of questions as to how they came to be there in the first place and of what assistance they may have received from foreign intelligence agencies in getting there. ISIS in Iraq and Syria has been used by foreign powers opposed to the central government in Damascus as a bludgeon with which to devastate the country.

      It seems the same modus operandi will be applied to Afghanistan, with the putative struggle between ISIS and the Taliban serving as the perfect blessing for this strange marriage of convenience between the U.S. and the Taliban and a justification for a continued presence by the U.S. in Afghanistan.

      Washington’s continued presence will not only destabilize Afghanistan but also neighboring countries like Pakistan and India that have suffered from the consequences of U.S. military occupation in the region for 17 years.

      Washington’s agreement with the Taliban will only further cement the role of the U.S. in the valiant fight against international terrorism, reflecting similar roles played by Saudi Arabia and Turkey in Yemen and Syria respectively, the former a U.S. ally and the latter a prominent NATO member.

      The aim of China, Russia and Iran is to drive the U.S. out of the Middle East and Eurasia and thereby bring about peace, stability and prosperity to the region. Afghanistan and Iran are two countries critical in the expansion of the Belt and Road Initiative and all that it entails for Western Asia. The possibility of expelling Washington from the heart of Eurasia is an opportunity that Russia and China cannot afford to waste.


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 22:50

    • Turmoil In Malaysia After Prime Minister Mahathir's Shock Resignation
      Turmoil In Malaysia After Prime Minister Mahathir’s Shock Resignation

      It’s being described a shock resignation by the world’s oldest elected leader. The 94-year old Prime Minister of Malaysia, Mahathir Mohamad, who returned to power in 2018, announced his resignation on Monday in a mere two-line statement offering no details.

      He was asked to stay on as interim leader by the country’s king upon his resignation at 1pm local time. It follows a weekend of political turmoil, which will now continue this week as the question of a new government remains hanging in the balance. As Al Jazeera reports

      Mahathir’s decision follows a weekend of political wrangling, after it was reported on Sunday night that his party was planning to form a new government that would exclude his anointed successor, Anwar Ibrahim.

      …Anwar also said that Mahathir has no plans to join with anyone from the previous ruling coalition he defeated to try to form a new government.

      When asked if Mahathir was responsible for the current political turmoil, Anwar blamed “those within my party and outside using his name.”

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Malaysia’s Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad has submitted his resignation to the king, via Bangkok Post.

      The crisis was sparked reportedly upon Mahathir’s supporters within his own “Pact of Hope” coalition attempting to form a new coalition allegedly aimed to prevent the appointment of his agreed successor, Anwar Ibrahim.

      Anwar and Mahathir had in 2018 joined forces despite their rocky political relations to defeat a notoriously corruption-plagued government in the polls.

      For the time being it’s expected that Malaysia’s constitutional monarch will play a key role, with options to invite a leader to form a new administration, or alternately call for a fresh general election.

      There’s rumors that Mahathir himself may be behind the drive to form a new coalition in order to later more firmly solidify his power. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Anwar and Mahathir, via CNN

      The immediate effect of the surprise resignation was felt by the country’s stock markets, which plunged on the news

      Meanwhile, director of the Asia Institute Tasmania at the University of Tasmania Prof James Chin, told The Guardian of future prospects for the country’s politics: “The possible outcome is that you have a much stronger Malay-centric government with a much more Islamic outlook. This is very bad news for non-Malays – the Chinese and Indian communities in Malaysia make up more than 30% of the population.”


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 22:30

    • Shocking State Media Report Exposes Widespread Undercounting Of Coronavirus Deaths In Wuhan's Nursing Homes
      Shocking State Media Report Exposes Widespread Undercounting Of Coronavirus Deaths In Wuhan’s Nursing Homes

      Despite the WHO’s refusal to even consider the question during its press conference on Monday, evidence continues to mount that officials in Beijing and Hubei are seriously massaging the stats to conform to Beijing’s narrative that the outbreak is under control, and is finally starting to recede.

      Yesterday, we shared the story of a doctor in Hunan who said out of 50 deaths at his hospital that day, authorities only counted one in the official stats.

      Then in the early hours of Tuesday morning, state-controlled business publication Caixin published a shocking scoop that exposed officials’ undercounting, and also suggested that the exaggerations are about as bad as critics feared.

      It’s hard to image that this wasn’t a deliberate act of defiance by a journalist who was finally fed up with official lies. The death of Dr. Li Wenliang earlier this month inspired a nascent free-speech movement that just might outlast the outbreak, unless authorities move to brutally crush it.

      The reporters claim that a pattern of discrepancies that has emerged in the official statistics surrounding cases tied to nursing homes and other facilities specializing in elder care. The elderly are, of course, one of several vulnerable populations singled out by the WHO and the governor of Hubei for special care.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      But after it came to light late last week that Chinese authorities missed 500 cases in several prisons in and outside of Hubei, journalists and local officials got curious to see what else was being overlooked.

      One nursing home situated just blocks from the seafood market where the outbreak allegedly began reported 19 deaths recently all of which are believed to have been caused by the virus. However, a doctor told the paper that only one death was counted in the official statistics.

      Unexplained deaths from lung ailments among the elderly at the Wuhan Social Welfare Institute and similar facilities suggest that nursing homes may be another blind spot as the government’s epidemic-fighting efforts have focused on hospitals and other communities. Last week it came to light that Chinese prisons reported more than 500 previously uncounted Covid-19 cases among guards and inmates.

      The situation was complicated by the quarantine, which cut off many family members from their loved ones. Once elderly patients were moved into quarantines, it only became more difficult to track them.

      After Wuhan tightened quarantine measures to restrict people from leaving their homes and to send the sick into makeshift quarantine quarters, many people lost contact with elderly family members in nursing homes. Family members of people in nursing homes say they have been trying to find out how many residents may be infected, where the elderly are quarantined, whether there are caregivers, what test results show and whether the government can send more medical and care staff to institutions.

      Given all the staff shortages, and the staggering number of health-care professionals who caught the virus, family members accused the state of failing to provide sufficient protections for elderly family members who died of the virus.

      Some family members of deceased seniors told Caixin that the nursing home didn’t take sufficient protective measures and residents were not even asked to wear masks.

      The doctor at the infirmary said the nursing home wasn’t sealed off until Jan. 21, when the outbreak was already spreading quickly in the city. Because it was close to the Lunar New Year, there were many visitors at the nursing home every day. It hasn’t been ruled out that visiting family members might have brought the virus into the nursing home, the doctor said.

      A medical worker at the nursing home said it’s also difficult to implement quarantine measures because of staff shortages and residents with dementia.

      Apparently, Caixin managed to obtain official documents proving the discrepancy: A register of the deceased from the nursing home where they lived showed 15 deaths between Dec. 23 and Feb. 15, and four more on Feb. 18 for a total of 19.

      But only one death, that of an 83-year-old male who had lived at the facility, was recorded in the official stats. The others were assigned ambiguous causes of death, like “pneumonia”, a strategy that we’ve reported on previously.

      A list of the dead at the social welfare facility obtained by Caixin showed 15 fatalities between Dec. 23 and Feb. 11 and four more Feb. 18. Of the total of 19 fatalities, only the death of an 83-year-old male Feb. 15 was clearly linked to Covid-19. Eight others were attributed to infections, including six to lung infections and two deaths from shock caused by infection. The remaining 10 fatalities were reportedly from other causes, and five of them took place before Feb. 11 when the nursing home started testing for Covid-19.

      The nursing home never before had so many deaths in such a short time, according to a staff member who has worked there many years. Except for one 27-year-old female with cholecystitis, all of the 18 others on the fatalities list were in their 80s and 90s and most had diabetes, high blood pressure, stroke or disabilities, according to the list.

      It’s also notable that the facility is just a few hundred yards from the seamarket alleged to be ‘ground zero’ for the outbreak.

      The facility, just a few hundred yards from the seafood market that may have been the starting point of the outbreak, is a combination senior hospital and nursing home. It is home to 458 senior residents with 190 staff, 21 property management personnel and eight care workers. The facility has been sealed off since Jan. 21 as local authorities stepped up efforts to contain the outbreak. All staff have been asked to stay in the facility.

      One doctor who purportedly worked at the facility said he treated a man with a high fever who eventually died of “septic shock” back in December. But given the time that has passed, there would be no way to prove the virus was the cause.

      A doctor in the welfare facility’s infirmary said he participated in the treatment of a patient in late December who had a fever as high as 107.6 degrees Fahrenheit (42 degrees Celsius). The patient died from septic shock possibly caused by infection, but the cause of infection was unknown because no virus check was done, according to the doctor, who was later confirmed infected with Covid-19 himself.

      But even without the tests, the symptoms combined with the sharp increase in deaths suggests that dozens are going undercounted in Wuhan’s nursing homes.

      The doctor said he treated three seniors who died since late December. Several doctors, nurses and attendants have also shown symptoms of lung infection, the doctor said.

      A care worker said more than 10 seniors died during the Lunar New Year holiday. At first, they had fever and lost appetite. Those with recurrent fevers were transferred to quarantine rooms but died after a couple of days, the worker said.

      “Since they were never confirmed with tests, we don’t know whether they died from the virus,” the worker said. “But before the outbreak, even though many of the seniors at the nursing home have chronic diseases, we have never seen so many deaths in such a short time.”

      And if they’re being undercounted in Wuhan, which reportedly had relatively lax controls on who could visit these ‘vulnerable’ facilities, that means they’re likely undercounting deaths in hot-spot nursing homes across the country.


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 22:10

    • Did ISS Live-Feed Accidentally Capture "Top Secret" Hypersonic Vehicle Test?
      Did ISS Live-Feed Accidentally Capture “Top Secret” Hypersonic Vehicle Test?

      Scott C. Waring, the founder of UFO Sightings Daily, claims he has come across a strange video recorded from the International Space Station’s (ISS) NASA Space Cam that shows the moment an unidentified flying object rockets into orbit.  

       “I was watching the NASA live space station cam when I noticed the camera zooming in on a strange object coming from below the space station. At first I thought it was a capsule or satellite, but its speed increased and after 22 minutes it shot up and into deep space. I believed if it was a capsule it would have gone into low earth orbit then lower to land. But when this object shot upward into deep space, it literally blew my mind. This could be USAF top-secret alien tech fused craft, but I don’t think so, the person on the camera seemed dismayed and unprepared for its sudden appearance,” Waring said in a blog post

      Waring operates the YouTube channel ET Data Base and judging by his past videos and commentaries – he’s a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist. 

      He told tabloid newspaper Daily Express, that at one point, the NASA live camera suddenly “notices something down there and begins to zoom in on it.”

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Waring said NASA was the one zooming in on the object in the video, “not me.” 

      He said the ISS crew is as “baffled by it as I am. They don’t know what it is or why it is there.” 

      “It doesn’t like any kind of object I have seen before. If it is military, then it is a top-secret US air force technology,” he said. 

      One video commenter said, “Reminds me of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s (DARPA) Falcon Hypersonic Technology Vehicle 2 (HTV-2). Capable of Mach 20 (13,000 miles/hr). What fascinates me in this video, though, is that it travels upwards away from Earth’s orbit! Amazing video.”

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      While the authenticity of the video remains of a question, the probabilities of an alien spaceship are slim to none, but instead could be a top-secret DARPA hypersonic vehicle.

      As we’ve explained on several occasions, DARPA is actively testing these vehicles that can fly between Mach 5 (3,836 mph) and Mach 10 (7,672 mph).


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 21:50

    • Manhattan DA Who Declined To Prosecute Weinstein Years Ago Celebrates Demise Of "Vicious Sexual Predator"
      Manhattan DA Who Declined To Prosecute Weinstein Years Ago Celebrates Demise Of “Vicious Sexual Predator”

      Authored by Matt Nathan via LawAndCrime.com,

      Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance, a Democrat who has been in office for more than a decade now, briefly addressed the media after prosecutors secured a conviction against prominent Democratic Party donor and Hollywood bigwig Harvey Weinstein on counts of rape and criminal sexual act.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Vance credited eight women–victims and prosecutors–for “pull[ing] our justice system into the 21st Century by declaring that rape is rape, and sexual assault is sexual assault no matter what,” and no matter who committed the crimes.

      “This is the new landscape for survivors of sexual assault in America, I believe, and this is a new day,” he said. “It’s a new day because Harvey Weinstein has finally been held accountable for crimes he committed.” Vance said their bravery proved that rape is rape “even if there is no physical evidence.”

      You know who had an opportunity to hold “vicious sexual predator” Weinstein–and others–accountable years ago but didn’t? 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Cy Vance.

      Remember this from 2017 about something that didn’t happen in 2015?

      Just months after the Manhattan District Attorney’s office declined to prosecute Weinstein over sexual assault allegations, the Hollywood producer’s lawyer, Daid Boiesdonated $10,000 to Vance’s re-election campaign.

      First broken by journalists David Sirota and Jay Cassano, here’s a condensed version of that story: In April, 2015, Italian model Ambra Battilana Gutierrez accused Weinstein of groping her breasts and shoving his hands up her skirt. She contacted the NYPD and wanted to press charges. There was no lack of evidence in this case either. An audio recording made at the NYPD’s request–and available to Vance’s office–reveals that Weinstein admitted the initial unwanted contact and that he had a sordid history of making such contact.

      Many people clearly did remember this.

      Numerous articles were written after news about this got out, and other high-profile sexual assault cases Vance oversaw (and dismissed) started receiving additional scrutiny. As memorialized by the New Yorker:

      Vance’s stomach for high-profile prosecution was tested early on, in the 2011 sexual-assault case against the French politician Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who, before his arrest, was the head of the International Monetary Fund. A maid who was cleaning the Sofitel New York hotel suite where Strauss-Kahn was staying reported to police that he had emerged naked from the bathroom and forced her to perform oral sex. The D.A.’s office indicted Strauss-Kahn and trumpeted the strength of the case. But the office later disclosed credibility problems with the complaining witness. Vance reversed course and decided to dismiss all criminal charges, announcing that his office was “unable to credit her version of events beyond a reasonable doubt, what ever the truth may be about the encounter.”

      The last line of the blockquote above illustrates what Vance was referring to when he mentioned a “new landscape” in light of #MeToo.

      But the questions about Vance and his office’s decision-making when it comes to rich and powerful men accused of sex crimes do not end here. As recently as January, several survivors demanded his resignation when highlighting a sweetheart deal gifted to Columbia University gynecologist Dr. Robert Hadden.

      The disgraced OB/GYN was accused of sexually assaulting no less than 19 of his former patients—including Evelyn Yang, wife of 2020 Democratic Party presidential candidate and entrepreneur Andrew Yang.

      “Most women don’t know what you’re supposed to get when you’re pregnant,” Yang recently said in an interview—adding that she was initially unsure about what happened and that she only decided to open up about Hadden after other survivors came forward.

      “I feel like I put up with some inappropriate behavior that I didn’t know at the time was straight-up sexual abuse slash sexual assault until much later,” Yang continued, saying those doubts eventually dissipated. “I knew it was wrong. I knew I was being assaulted.”

      One of those additional survivors is Marissa Hoechstetter, who led the protest against Vance. Hoechstetter was the first woman to come forward about Hadden’s abuse. She claims he conducted unwarranted breast exams, made lewd comments about her looks and licked her vagina during a postpartum examination several years ago. Several additional woman have since come forward to register similar accusations.

      Hadden eventually pleaded out on various charges. There was no jail time, but Hadden was forced to give up his medical license. Vance also argued against placing Hadden on a sex offender registry.

      “For 10 years, Vance has repeatedly favored the wealthy and connected over justice for victims of sexual assault,” Hoechstetter said, noting that Hadden was actually first arrested in 2012 for licking another woman.

      But Vance’s office cut him loose. Hadden went on to abuse more women after that brief encounter with Manhattan justice.

      “Vance allowed that to happen,” Hoechstetter said. “It’s on him, and he must resign immediately.”

      The very same Manhattan District Attorney office run by Vance, it cannot be forgotten, once shocked a judge by requesting that the infamous dead pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s sex offender status be lowered to the lowest possible ranking.

      Back in 2011, Assistant Manhattan DA Jennifer Gaffney argued in court that Esptein’s sex offender status should be lowered from level 3 to level 1. If this was granted, Esptein would have been kept off the online sex offender database. This was after Epstein pleaded guilty to state charges of soliciting prostitution from a minor as part of a secretive, sweetheart plea deal that continues to garner intense scrutiny to this day. In reality, Esptein was accused of sexually abusing dozens of underage girls and ended up dodging federal charges. That changed in July 2019 Esptein was arrested for sex trafficking and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking. Epstein died the following month before he could stand trial.

      Per the New York Post on the judge’s response to an argument in favor of Epstein:

      “I have never seen the prosecutor’s office do anything like this,” Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Ruth Pickholz told Gaffney. “I have done many [cases] much less troubling than this one where [prosecutors] would never make a downward argument like this.”

      Pressed by the judge, Gaffney admitted that she never spoke to the Florida U.S. Attorney who handled a sprawling sex-crime investigation into the financier.

      “I don’t think you did much of an investigation here,” Pickholz said. “I am shocked.”

      Vance later admitted a mistake was made. Victims have said otherwise.

      It was also alleged that the Manhattan DA’s office was aware that Epstein was allowed to skip mandatory check-ins for sex offenders of his status–meaning Epstein was allowed to do something that others would be imprisoned for.

      “Our office vigorously prosecutes all failure-to-verify cases,” a Vance spokesman said at the time. “Our prosecutors did not and would not discourage the NYPD from making an arrest.”


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 21:30

    • Disruption Escalates: Proctor And Gamble Says Over 17,000 Products Potentially Impacted By Coronavirus
      Disruption Escalates: Proctor And Gamble Says Over 17,000 Products Potentially Impacted By Coronavirus

      While mom and dad on Main St. still aren’t getting the dire warning that the coronavirus has been offering up to Asia and the rest of the Eastern world over the last several weeks, perhaps a lightbulb will finally go off when Jane Q. Public heads to the grocery store and is unable to buy shampoo and toothpaste.  

      Proctor and Gamble, one of the world’s biggest “everyday product” manufacturers, has now officially warned that 17,600 of its products could be affected and disrupted by the coronavirus. The company’s CFO, Jon Moeller, said at a recent conference that P&G used 387 suppliers across China, shipping more than 9,000 materials, according to CIPS.org.

      Moeller said: “Each of these suppliers faces their own challenges in resuming operations.”

      And it’s not just everyday consumer goods that are going to feel the impact of the virus. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Smartphones and cars are so far among the consumer products that have been hardest hit from the virus. In fact, according to TrendForce, “forecasts for product shipments from China for the first quarter of 2020 had been slashed, by 16% for smartwatches (to 12.1m units), 12.3% for notebooks (30.7m units) and 10.4% for smartphones (275m units). Cars have dropped 8.1% (19.3m units).”

      Their report states: “The outbreak has made a relatively high impact on the smartphone industry because the smartphone supply chain is highly labor-intensive. Although automakers can compensate for material shortage through overseas factories, the process of capacity expansion and shipping of goods is still expected to create gaps in the overall manufacturing process.”

      A separate coronavirus analysis by Mintec says that “Chinese demand for copper (it has hitherto been responsible for consuming half the world’s output), will fall by 500,000 tonnes this year, and falls in demand have already impacted prices. From December to January the price of copper fell 9.6%.”

      The report notes: “Millions of people have been affected by the travel lockdown in Hubei province, the centre of the outbreak. This has been responsible for a glut of jet fuel and diesel on global markets at a time when petroleum supplies were already abundant.” 

      Other products that have been negatively affected so far include pork, which is up 11% this month, chicken, garlic and dried ginger. 

      Product supply chain issues could eventually compound hysteria at supermarkets if coronavirus becomes widespread in western countries. Northern Italy, which has seen a small outbreak of coronavirus cases over the last 48 hours, is already experiencing long lines and sold out store shelves. 


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 21:10

    • It Begins: Chinese Business Conditions Crash Most On Record
      It Begins: Chinese Business Conditions Crash Most On Record

      For the past two weeks, even as the market took delight in China’s doctored and fabricated numbers showing the coronavirus spread was “slowing”, we warned again and again that not only was this not the case (which was confirmed by the latest data out of South Korea, Japan and now Italy), but that for all its assertions to the contrary, China’s workers simply refused to go back to work (even with FoxConn offering its workers extra bonuses just to return to the factory) and as a result the domestic economy had ground to a halt, something we described previously in:

      Unfortunately, one month after the start of the Lunar New Year it’s not getting any better, as the latest high frequency updates out of China, courtesy of Goldman Sachs, demonstrate.

      First, here is China’s daily coal consumption which have barely pushed off the lows, and are roughly 50% where they were a year ago this time.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      With coal demand in the doldrums, it is also to be expected that coal supply is depressed as well, and indeed coal volumes over the past week remain 25% lower than the past 3 years’ average, and roughly 33% below the 2019 level.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      One of the better indicators of real-time commerce, traffic congestion, remains virtually unchanged, and substantially below where it was in previous years.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Yet, hilariously, this being China even with no transport, no commerce, and virtually no power plant use, pollution is finally starting to ramp up. One wonders what is causing this if it’s not coal demand, or transportation: maybe all those crematoriums working overtime?

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      And speaking of not transport, the number of passengers carried after the New Year is barely above 10 million, almost 50 million below last year’s levels.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Meanwhile, a brief silver lining in the economy was promptly snuffed out last week, when the property sales volume in 30 major cities crashed back to earth and remains well below 25% of the seasonal norm.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      And with no end market demand, it is hardly a surprise that steel demand has continued to crater, and was below half the normal level from the past 3 years.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Last but not least, and perhaps most ominous of all, the earlier semi-official data print in the form of the February survey on business conditions showed a depression level plunge, with the index crashing more than 18 points, the most on record, to 37.3, which confirms Nomura’s expectation of a manufacturing PMI print later this week which may have a 30-handle.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

       


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 20:50

    • More Turkish Troop Deaths In Idlib Bring Russia & Turkey To Breaking Point
      More Turkish Troop Deaths In Idlib Bring Russia & Turkey To Breaking Point

      After on Monday there were new unconfirmed reports of several Turkish Army soldiers killed or wounded in a Russian air strike on a Turkish convoy, already tense relations between Moscow and Ankara are at a breaking point. 

      “Several soldiers from the Turkish Army were reportedly killed or wounded this afternoon following the joint airstrikes launched by the Syrian and Russian air forces in the Idlib Governorate,” Beirut-based Al Masdar News reports. “According to pro-opposition media, as many as ten Turkish soldiers were killed or wounded as a result of the joint Russian-Syrian airstrikes near the town of Kansafra.”

      And British-Syrian journalist Danny Makki, who reports from inside Syria lists “10 Turkish casualties between killed and wounded in the Russian airstrikes today sources suggest, 4 armoured vehicles also purportedly destroyed.” However, there’s yet to be official confirmation out of Turkey of these new alleged casualties. Ankara did previously confirm at least one soldier killed in fighting on Sunday.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Turkish military post in Idlib, via Anadolu Agency.

      Turkey’s Defense Ministry has in total acknowledged 16 of its soldiers killed amid the renewed Syrian-Russian offensive to take back Idlib, which began early December. 

      These increasingly direct clashes between Syrian-Russian allied forces and Turkish national troops have led to renewed urgent talks announced Monday between Russian and Turkish officials.

      Russian FM Sergey Lavrov announced Monday that “Another series of consultations is now being prepared and we hope it will help us reach an agreement on how to ensure that this really becomes a de-escalation zone and terrorists don’t boss around there.” 

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      “I hope that the ongoing contacts between our military and the Turkish military, with the participation of diplomats and security services, will end positively, and we will be able to make sure that terrorists do not take over this part of Syria, as, in fact, they should not take over anywhere else,” Lavrov added.

      The Kremlin is further trying to downplay what Turkish officials are describing as a “crisis”  also given President Erdogan has lately vowed to not allow Idlib to be taken by pro-Assad forces. “Russian-Turkish relations should not be depicted as in crisis even after an escalation in political tensions over Syria’s last rebel-held enclave of Idlib, Presidential Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Sunday,” according to TASS news agency.

      “Certainly, we would not like to plunge into this gloomy mood and in fact to make extremely negative scenarios, but the week has really happened to be absolutely restless,” Peskov commented in a televised interview.

      Sixteen Turkish military personnel have been killed in shelling by Syrian government forces over the past two weeks, prompting Turkey to tell Russia to “stand aside” while its forces bombard dozens of Syrian army targets in retaliation.

      Moscow has warned Ankara to fulfil pledges made to disarm Islamist fighters it depicts as terrorists. The two sides held talks in the Russian capital last week to help diffuse tensions. — Ahval News

      Turkey has sent thousands of troops into Idlib while sealing off the border with the northwest province, also hoping to prevent some one million more refugees from flooding in, adding to already some three million plus refugees Turkey says it’s hosting. 


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 20:30

    • Most Americans Are Not Taking This Coronavirus Outbreak Seriously, And That Is Potentially Very Dangerous
      Most Americans Are Not Taking This Coronavirus Outbreak Seriously, And That Is Potentially Very Dangerous

      Authored by Michael Snyder via The Economic Collapse blog,

      We still don’t know if this coronavirus outbreak will become a horrific worldwide pandemic or not, but what we have seen so far is definitely very alarming.  People have literally been dropping dead in the streets, the Chinese government has locked down major city after major city, and the virus kept spreading very rapidly on a cruise ship off the coast of Japan even though a strict quarantine was instituted.  Scientists that have studied the virus are telling us that it “could be 20 times more lethal than the flu”, and it binds to human cell receptors much more easily than the SARS virus did.  Unfortunately, because the epicenter of this crisis is on the other side of the globe, most Americans are simply not paying much attention to it.  In fact, most of the people that my wife and I have been talking to and hearing from don’t think that the coronavirus is much of a threat to the United States at all.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      And if the coronavirus does start to become a problem in this country, a new survey has found that most Americans are quite confident that the government can handle it

      More than three in four Americans say they are very confident or somewhat confident in the US federal government’s ability to handle a coronavirus outbreak, a Gallup poll has found, a higher level of confidence than in previous health scares.

      Gallup said the results were from a February 3 to February 16 poll that began just days after the Trump administration announced it would suspend entry of foreign nationals who had been to China in the previous two weeks.

      Hopefully this coronavirus outbreak will not explode in North America and our normal lives will not be disrupted.

      But considering what is happening over in Asia, it would definitely be prudent to take some precautions.  Unfortunately, most Americans are not really doing much of anything to prepare for a potential pandemic at this point.

      If a pandemic does not materialize, that won’t be a problem.  But if this virus starts spreading like wildfire in the U.S., we are going to have a massive crisis on our hands.

      The time to stop an outbreak from happening is at the very beginning, and the lack of urgency about this virus that we are witnessing from local health officials around the country is absolutely stunning.

      According to NBC News, there are thousands of Americans that are currently “under voluntary self-quarantine”.  These individuals have either recently traveled to China or they have recently had contact with someone that was infected.

      As you might assume, a “voluntary self-quarantine” is not mandatory.  Instead, NBC News says that it is “strongly encouraged”

      Self-quarantining isn’t mandatory, but it is strongly encouraged.

      It’s up to the state and local health departments to decide how to manage residents under self-quarantine.

      So anyone that doesn’t want to participate can feel free to mix with the general public as much as they want.

      Isn’t that great?

      And since it is “up to the state and local health departments to decide how to manage residents under self-quarantine”, there is no single set of standards that is being followed.

      In other words, state and local health officials are free to make things up as they go along.

      We aren’t talking about a small number of people either.  In fact, more than 5,000 people are under self-quarantine in California alone

      The California Public Health Department said there are more than 5,400 such people in the state. In Washington state, 745 people have been asked to self-quarantine. Georgia health officials identified about 200 travelers.

      The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services said more than 300 people were referred for monitoring.

      All it takes is a couple of “super spreaders” to get a real good outbreak going, and to see such a lack of concern about preventing the spread of this disease is quite disheartening.

      And this lackadaisical attitude has even extended to actual victims that have been confirmed to have the virus.  The CDC specifically warned against putting infected people on the same flight with non-infected people, but the U.S. government did it anyway

      Fourteen Americans who tested positive for the Coronavirus were flown back to the US on a flight with over 300 people who were not infected, despite objections from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

      The flight was filled with people who were evacuated from the Diamond Princess cruise ship in Japan, which had been quarantined due to an outbreak of the virus.

      Reading this sort of thing makes you want to tear your hair out.

      Despite such extreme negligence, hopefully everything will be okay.  But it should be noted that the CDC is telling hospitals that now “is the time to open up your pandemic plans and see that things are in order”

      “This is the time to open up your pandemic plans and see that things are in order,” Dr. Anne Schuchat, a top official of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, urged hospitals last week as an outbreak of a deadly new coronavirus ravaged much of China.

      “For instance,” she continued, health-care providers need to plan for a “surge at a hospital, the ability to provide personal protective equipment for your workforce, the administrative controls and so forth that you might put place in a health care setting.”

      Anyone that assumed that this crisis would be largely confined to China has been proven wrong.  At this point, we have already seen significant outbreaks erupt in several other countries in Asia.  In fact, there are now eight other nations where “community spread” is taking place…

      • Japan

      • Singapore

      • South Korea

      • Taiwan

      • Thailand

      • Vietnam

      • Italy

      • France

      Perhaps the most notable outbreak on that list is in South Korea.  According to the Guardian, 31 brand new cases were announced on Thursday…

      The South Korean city of Daegu was facing an “unprecedented crisis” after coronavirus infections that centred on a controversial “cult” church surged to 38 cases, accounting for nearly half of the country’s total.

      The city of 2.5 million people, which is two hours south of the capital Seoul, was turned into a ghost town after health officials said the bulk of country’s 31 new cases announced on Thursday were linked to a branch of the Shincheonji Church of Jesus.

      If we don’t want the same thing to happen here, we need to take this virus very seriously.

      Unfortunately, that is simply not happening, and all of us could end up paying a great price as a result.


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 20:10

    • Israel Takes Out Islamic Jihad Militants In Damascus & Gaza In Rare Simultaneous Air Strikes
      Israel Takes Out Islamic Jihad Militants In Damascus & Gaza In Rare Simultaneous Air Strikes

      Damascus once again was rocked by Israeli airstrikes Sunday night, with Syria saying its anti-air defenses were active in confronting a wave of “enemy rockets” from the direction of the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.

      In a rare acknowledgement of the attack, Israel confirmed in was behind it, and linked it to rocket fire from the Palestinian territory, Gaza. The Israeli army said in a statement that it targeted Islamic Jihad leaders living in Damascus

      “In the Adeliyah region, outside of Damascus, an Islamic Jihad compound was struck, used as a hub of Islamic Jihad’s activity in Syria,” the statement said. “Israeli military planes targeted Islamic Jihad targets in Gaza” it said further. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Israeli air strike in the southern Gaza Strip on Sunday, on a night which also saw attacks on the Syrian capital. Image source: Reuters. 

      Palestinian Islamic Jihad confirmed that two of its members were killed in Damascus Sunday night, in a relatively brief attack which war monitors say killed a total of six people. The other four were alleged to be members of a pro-Iranian militia.  

      But Syrian state-run SANA said the country’s air defenses were effective, noting they “caused the missiles to deviate from their path, destroying most of the remainder before reaching their goals, and the results of the aggression are still being examined.”

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Like with prior attacks over the past two years, Israeli jets were said to have fired from outside of Syrian airspace most of the time from over neighboring Lebanon. Historically, wanted or exiled leaders of Palestinian militant and “resistance” groups have had headquarters in Damascus.  

      Islamic Jihad’s military wing, promised retaliation, saying in a statement: “The Israeli aggression in Damascus and killing two of our fighters is an event that cannot be ignored and will not pass quietly,” according to Haaretz.

      Israel simultaneously launched airstrikes on Gaza in response to earlier rocket fire:

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      This particular attack is notable not only because it was essentially an assassination of Palestinian commanders related to Gaza, but also because Tel Aviv owned up to it immediately. Prior attacks have been focused on preventing Iranian expansion and entrenchment inside Syria. 

      Israel’s Defense chief Naftali Bennett vowed last week to step up offensive attacks in Syria to stop Iran. “We will go from preventive action to offensive action — the only measure that guarantees us the expulsion of Iran out of Syria,” he said.

      “We are warning them (the Iranians), we will turn Syria into an Iranian Vietnam, and you will continue to bleed until the last Iranian soldier leaves Syrian territory,” the nation’s defense chief threatened


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 19:50

    • Harvey Weinstein Ambulance To Rikers Diverts To Hospital For Unknown Reason
      Harvey Weinstein Ambulance To Rikers Diverts To Hospital For Unknown Reason

      Update (19:35 ET): Weinstein’s ambulance was redirected from Rikers Island to Bellvue hospital for an unknown reason, according to his spokesperson Juda Engelmayer.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Perhaps he was struck with a sudden bout of affluenza?

      * * *

      Harvey Weinstein was convicted of third degree rape and a criminal sexual act by a New York jury of seven men and five women, who took five days to reach their verdict. He faces up to 25 years in prison, and will remain in custody until his March 11 sentencing.

      Weinstein was acquitted of predatory sexual assault, the most serious charge, and first degree rape.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The jury was deadlocked on the charge of predatory sexual assault, the most serious accusation against the disgraced 67-year-old Hollywood mogul, offering a glimpse into disagreements between jurors who had been deliberating in New York City over four days.

      Jurors had told Judge James Burke in a note, “We the jury request to understand if we can be hung on 1 and or 3 but unanimous on the others.”

      Counts 1 and 3 are charges of predatory sexual assault.

      Count 2 is criminal sexual act in the first degree, count 4 is rape in the first degree, and count 5 is rape in the third degree.

      Burke told jurors that any verdict that they returned must be unanimous and that if they cannot be unanimous on a specific criminal count then they cannot return a verdict for that count. –CNBC

      According to the Wall Street Journal, “Predatory sexual assault requires jurors to agree that Mr. Weinstein carried out more than one sex crime and carries a sentence of up to life in prison.”

      Weinstein was charged with one count of criminal sex act for allegedly forcible performing oral sex on former film-production assistant Miriam Haley in 2006, as well as first and third degree rape charges for allegedly forcing himself upon aspiring actress Jessica Mann in a Manhattan hotel room in 2013.


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 19:36

    • Are We Seriously Debating Capitalism Vs. Socialism Again?
      Are We Seriously Debating Capitalism Vs. Socialism Again?

      Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The American Institute for Economic Research,

      The answer is yes, we are seriously debating capitalism vs. socialism again. As it should be. And herein lies the silver lining in one of the most alarming trends in public life: a self-described socialist is leading in the polls to win the Democratic nomination. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      For nearly 100 years, public figures in America have dabbled in socialist ideology, learned from it, practiced it on a limited scale, imposed policies rooted in its logic, and been inspired by its conflict ethos that imagines markets to be inherently exploitative, unfair, and unjust.

      It makes some kind of weird sense that finally at the highest (?) levels of American public life, they would just finally come out and say it: we are all kind of socialist now. 

      To contradict that claim requires that you see the problem with socialism, and to see that problem leads one to think through the logic of markets and economics, which in turn leads one to see the virtues of commercial freedom. But doing that, taking those hard steps to understand scarcity, creativity, prices, and exchange threatens to undermine the ideological infrastructure of the Democratic Party itself. What has emerged instead is a “no enemies to the left” ethos that allows the extremists to control the messaging. 

      David Brooks, writing for the New York Times, makes the very compelling point that the reason Bernie Sanders is coming out on top is that he offers a clear (if utterly unrealistic) worldview that the others tacitly accept, so therefore they are not really in a position to shatter his presumptions:

      Over the past five years Sanders and his fellow progressives have induced large parts of the Democratic Party to see through the Bernie lens. You can tell because every candidate on that stage has the categories and mental equipment to carve up a billionaire like Bloomberg. None have the categories or mental equipment to take down a socialist like Sanders.

      Sanders goes untouched in these debates because the other candidates don’t have a mythic platform from which to launch an attack. Saying his plans cost too much is a pathetic response to a successful myth.

      Myth is right, and it was too much for Michael Bloomberg, who called him out for favoring socialism in a country in which the most famous socialist owns three homes. To be sure, to someone like Sanders, there is nothing contradictory here. The dictatorship of the proletariat always needs a vanguard elite to channel the interests and energies of the working classes; it stands to reason that they should live well, in this way of thinking. Such has it always been. 

      Socialism is a movement not of the working classes but of the elites, born of arrogance, snobbery, and preposterous pretense, kept alive not from lived experience but the astonishing capacity of an ideologically soaked brain to live in denial of reality. 

      But what about this term capitalism? The case against it as a description of the market economy is that it was an invention of the Marxists, and for a reason: it was supposed to describe an economy ruled by the capitalists. In fact, capitalism is nothing more than the working out of the advanced stage of a society that respects private property, peace, and freedom of association and trade. It is not an imposition or even a system; it is a description of what happens when violent actors bow out of the process of social evolution. 

      For this reason, many of my classically liberal friends would just as soon get rid of the term. 

      On the other hand, the term does zero in on the main debate: whether and to what extent should the produced means of production (capital) be unmolested by public authority and accumulated by successful companies. The non-capitalists of the political class want to bust up and pillage businesses just because they are big and tax the rich just because they are rich. The problem is that this is the path to impoverishment. 

      Capital, on the other hand, is institutionally essential for complex production structures and the division of labor. There is no doing without, though many societies have tried. 

      What’s more, socialists will tell you that they aren’t against private property as such, just private ownership in the means of production. So there is a sense in which framing the debate over the future of freedom really is an argument about capitalism vs. socialism. The logic of this demand trends toward finding a stable truth: there is freedom and private property or there is not. We need to have this debate. Probably it should never stop. 

      I personally recall that after 1989, I was pretty sure that the argument had been settled for all time and eternity. Part of me was disappointed because I had cut my teeth on this issue during the Cold War. Maybe all my knowledge would now be of historical interest only. Not so: the very next issue of a Marxian academic periodical headlined “the collapse of Stalinism” – announcing this only 40 years too late. 

      So yes, the intellectual battle continues. Watch the movie and buy the two books: The Best of Marx and the Best of Mises


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 19:30

    • Retail Investors Steamrolled By Monday Mauling After Berserker Buying Spree
      Retail Investors Steamrolled By Monday Mauling After Berserker Buying Spree

      Retail investors are legendary for chasing market momentum into a market meltup, buying stocks indiscriminately at all time highs with the confidence that a greater retail fool will buy the same stock from them at an even higher price. They are also notoriously fickle and dump stocks just as the momentum reverses, selling at lows. And following the biggest one-day market drop in years, we are about to find out if the record retail volume surge, and retail outperformance from the past few months is about to disintegrate with a bang.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Remarkably, it was just two days ago that we musedhow, ever since the launch of the Fed’s QE4, in October, retail investors had trounced hedge funds.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Curiously, the case can be made that the biggest reason why hedge funds did not do even worse in the YTD period, where the equity hedge fund cohort placed dead last in the list of assets tracked by Goldman…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      … is because retail investors ended up buying a substantial number of the same stocks that comprise the 50 most popular, aka hedge fund VIP stocks, from tech giants to small-caps.

      Yet while they have their similarities, the two baskets of most preferred stocks by retail and hedge fund investors, also have their differences, and as we said on Saturday, “ultimately it all really boils down to the far higher beta of the retail basket compared to the hedge fund VIPs: which means that while retail investors tend to win big, they also lose big when stocks tumble.”

      We then concludes by noting that “while it is certainly a novelty to see retail investors outperform hedge funds, we doubt this divergence will last long.

      Sure enough, just as fast as momentum giveth, momentum taketh away, and one day after we discussed the remarkable, if fleeting outperformance of retail investors, the group was steamrolled by the Monday’s furious selloff which sent the S&P tumbling 3.35%, with the Goldman basket of retail favorites – among which Tesla, Spring PG&E and SPCE – tumbling the most in nine months, and catching down to the hedge fund VIP basket, with the two sets of stocks now neck and neck in their performance over the past 6 months.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      As shown above, Goldman’s basket of 50 most-popular stocks among individual (i.e. retail) investors fell 3.9%, its biggest one-day drop since last May, with all but two of the 50 stocks sliding, and as recent darlings Tesla and Plug Power each sank more than 6%. As Bloomberg notes, “it has been a decisive turnaround for retail investors”, whose picks we first noted last Friday had surged 13% in 2020 before this week, outperforming the S&P 500 by a factor of four as retail investors bought not only high beta, momentum stocks but also a record amount of calls on stocks

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      … which mature within a week.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The question is what happens next: will retail investors just double down and BTFD, or – as they have traditionally done in the past – scatter at the first sign of a momentum reversal?

      “A lot of that money does tend to be hot money,” FTSE Russell managing director Alec Young told Bloomberg: “It’s very sensitive to near-term losses” of which there have been a lot in just the past three days, because shortly after the S&P hit a new all time high less five days ago, the S&P 500 has dropped almost 5% from its record close, the bull market’s biggest slilde in six months, amid fears of a global coronavirus pandemic.

      Desperate to preserve their reputation as Wall Street insiders – because what good is their job, and their 7 figure comp if amateur mom and pop can outperform their stock picsk – some strategists took offense at the outperformance of retail investors, who they claim are buying bonds not stocks, and that equity markets are the realm of institutions and other “smart money.”

      “A lot of what is happening with bonds has to do with demographics,” said Baird strategist Michael Antonelli. “Baby Boomers are retiring, the world is starved for yields.” The equity market, on the other hand, “is really controlled by institutions. This up-and-down price action, that’s not retail money,” he said, although nobody who has seen the ridiculous moves in some momo stocks in the past month actually believes him.

      A simple counter to Antonelli’s argument is who panic buys stocks at all time high valuations, which is where the market has been trading in recent weeks. There is just one group that does: as Bloomberg notes, when pointing to last week’s 19x P/E multiple for the S&P, the highest since the dot-com era, “no other investor group than retail has a greater propensity to chase winners regardless of valuations and company fundamentals. Among retail’s darling stocks, 10 scored year-to-date gains exceeding 20%, including Plug Power, Tesla and Virgin Galactic. Yet only two made profits in 2019.”

      Yet while retail investors are legendary for their late cycle euphoria, and their desire to participate in distributions, in which the rich sell to the poor just before a recession hits…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      … hedge funds were just as happy to capitalize on retail investor euphoria: as we said last Friday, retail infatuation with such hedge fund darlings as Apple, Amazon.com, Facebook and Microsoft has contributed to the top-heavy market that some strategists have warned is becoming hard to sustain, as today’s selloff clearly demonstrated.

      Of course, such a retail buying frenzy, which as shown in the chart below was also facilitated by the recent decision by online brokers E*Trade, Schwab and TD Ameritrade to cut commissions to zero which in turn double the daily average number of trades…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      … is not new, and reminds Peter Cecchini of the retail over-involvement in the late 1990s that marked the end of the golden age of equities and foreshadowed the crash.

      “While retail involvement in and of itself is not always a sign of frothy markets, when that involvement generally appears to be based on a fear of missing out or otherwise uniformed decision-making, as now, then it is cautionary,” said Cecchini, chief market strategist at Cantor Fitzgerald.

      The problem, as Cecchini adds, is that “the coronavirus may help demonstrate how quickly it can all come unraveled when fundamentals disconnect from the narrative hype.”

      And in a world in which retail investors have outperformed both the market and hedge funds, it would not be surprising if everyone looks at what Joe Sixpack does tomorrow to determine whether the post-QE4 meltup is now over, or if the coronavirus scare was merely the latest blip, whose dip was quickly bought.


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 19:10

    • US Claims Russia Spreading Disinfo Blaming America For Coronavirus Outbreak
      US Claims Russia Spreading Disinfo Blaming America For Coronavirus Outbreak

      US officials are claiming that thousands of ‘Russian-linked’ social media accounts have launched a coordinated effort to promote disinformation about coronavirus – including a theory that the US is behind the outbreak, according to The Guardian, which calls it an “apparent bid to damage America’s image around the world.”

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The accounts in question have popped up on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, according to State department officials – with some of the suspected bad actors claiming that the United States is waging “economic war on China,” and that the virus is a CIA-manufactured biological weapon.

      Several thousand online accounts – previously identified for airing Russian-backed messages on major events such as the war in Syria, the Yellow Vest protests in France and Chile’s mass demonstrations – are posting “near identical” messages about the coronavirus, according to a report prepared for the state department’s Global Engagement Center and seen by the AFP.

      The accounts are run by humans, not bots, and post at similar times in English, Spanish, Italian, German and French. They can be linked back to Russian proxies, or carry messages similar to Russian-backed outlets such as RT and Sputnik, the report said.

      “In this case, we were able to see their full disinformation ecosystem in effect, including state TV, proxy websites and thousands of false social media personas all pushing the same themes,” said Lea Gabrielle, the head of the Global Engagement Center, which is tasked with tracking and exposing propaganda and disinformation. –The Guardian

      Russia’s intent is to sow discord and undermine US institutions and alliances from within, including through covert and coercive malign influence campaigns,” said Philip Reeker, acting assistant secretary of state for Europe and Eurasia.

      “By spreading disinformation about coronavirus, Russian malign actors are once again choosing to threaten public safety by distracting from the global health response,” Reeker added.

      We would note that The Guardian, nor their sources, have provided any direct evidence of these claims.

      The Guardian then does its job to calm the masses – noting that the World Health Organization (WHO) says 80% of people who contract COVID-19 come down with a ‘mild respiratory illness,’ and likens it to the 2003 Sars virus, “which was thought to have come from bats.”

      In four out of five people, Covid-19 causes only mild respiratory illness, the World Health Organization (WHO) has said. But in some, the virus can cause severe respiratory illness including pneumonia. In the worst cases, it can cause respiratory failure.

      Covid-19 has killed more than 2,340 people, mostly in China, and infected more than 76,000. The US has tested more than 400 people and found 14 confirmed cases, mostly linked to travelers.

      A similar outbreak in 2003 involved the Sars virus, which was thought to have come from bats.

      Of course, The Guardian makes no mention of the Wuhan, China level-4 bioweapons lab located less than a mile from the wet market where the first cluster of cases was traced to – so looks like they’re going with the ‘naturally occurring’ bat theory.

      According to the report, the Russia-linked coronavirus disinformation campaign “has parallels with previous conspiracy theories traced to Moscow, including a KGB disinformation campaign in the 1980s that convinced many around the world that US scientists created the HIV virus that causes Aids.”

      The Guardian reports that US officials believe the alleged Russian disinfo campaign is complicating efforts to respond to the epidemic – particularly in Asia and Africa, as people have become suspicious of the West.


      Tyler Durden

      Mon, 02/24/2020 – 18:50

    Digest powered by RSS Digest

    Today’s News 24th February 2020

    • How The "Interpreter" Scam Brought 75,000 Iraqis And Afghans To America
      How The “Interpreter” Scam Brought 75,000 Iraqis And Afghans To America

      Authored by Daniel Greenfield via Sultan Knish blog,

      The latest battle over Special Immigrant Visas pitted Stephen Miller, President Trump’s senior advisor, against the Pentagon. The military brass was lobbying for 6,000 special immigrant visas for Iraqis who worked for American forces in the country. These visas were once again billed as helping “interpreters”.

      That’s a lot of interpreters considering that there were only 5,200 American troops in Iraq.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      How could there be more Iraqi interpreters for American troops than there are troops?

      The Special Immigrant Visa scam has been sold for over a decade using the same claim that it’s needed to save the lives of Iraqi and Afghan interpreters who are risking death by helping American soldiers.

      In one decade, the United States has handed out 75,250 of these visas to Iraqi and Afghan employees, and their dependents. Between 2007 and 2017, they represented 1 percent of all immigrant visas.

      The truth is that the military brass has wrongly used the incentive of Special Immigrant Visas to recruit local personnel and cut costs by promising them resettlement in the United States. Considering the costs of resettling even the nicest Iraqi or Afghan families, it would have been cheaper to pay each of them a six-figure salary. But that would have come out of the defense budget. The SIV scam passes the buck to local cities and states, to ordinary taxpayers and communities who have to hire interpreters who speak Pashto to interact with the children of the interpreters who are swamping local school systems.

      One Iraqi or Afghan employee brings a lot more dependents and expenses with him. In 2017, the 4,677 Iraqi and Afghan employees brought 13,713 dependents with them for a total of 18,390 refugees.

      Those were the worst numbers since before Obama took office.

      While conventional refugee numbers have been slashed, the number of Special Immigrant Visas for Iraqis and Afghans drastically shot up because the Pentagon was getting its way on immigration. Few of these visas were for actual interpreters. That number tends to be capped at 50 a year. Most of the SIV applicants coming in had to have only worked for a few years in often vaguely defined capacities.

      Some were actual interpreters. Many more were cultural advisors and linguists.

      All they have to do is claim that they received threats over their work for the US or the ISAF, the multinational force in Afghanistan, and they are resettled in the United States as refugees.

      While the media has repeatedly accused President Trump of stopping interpreters from coming to this country even though they, allegedly, risked their lives, the number of SIV visas for Afghans and Iraqis shot up from 10,681 in 2014, to 14,383 in 2016, to 18,390 in 2017.

      That’s when Stephen Miller tried to slam on the brakes.

      The media complains that visa processing isn’t fast enough. And that the lives of SIV applicants are at risk every day they’re living in their own country. But bypassing vetting puts American lives at risk.

      As a measure of how bad the vetting is, Ali Yousif Ahmed Al-Nouri, the Emir of an Al Qaeda group in Fallujah, entered this country as a refugee and applied for disability. He then went to work as a military contractor on a California base, teaching soldiers deploying to Iraq about the local culture. That’s the typical sort of task that many SIV visas are provided for which require little more than English skills.

      Was an Al Qaeda Emir employed by the US military in Iraq? Did Al-Nouri come here on an SIV visa? The answer is he probably did, but no one seems to be especially willing to ask or answer that question.

      Bilal Abood came to the United States on an SIV visa. Like many SIV applicants, he had worked as a contract linguist in Iraq. Like most SIV applicants, he claimed to have faced threats because of his work.

      Once in the United States, Abood began viewing ISIS beheading videos and tweeted, “I pledge obedience to the Caliphate Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.” That was the leader of ISIS.

      “The United States is the enemy of Allah,” he had said.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Jasim Mohammed Hasin Ramadon and Ali Mohammed Hasan Al Juboori, Mustafa Sataar Al Feraji, Ali Mohammed Hasan Al Juboori, and Yasir Jabbar Jasim, 5 Iraqis who who came to America on SIV visas, took part in the rape of an American woman in Colorado Springs who was abused so badly that there was blood splattered on the wall. Her mistake was sympathizing with the poor hapless refugees.

      That’s our mistake as a country.

      Ramadon, like the other SIV applicants celebrated by the media, had an NCO lobby for him. He appeared on Oprah, was featured in a book, and became a celebrity. Then he was hit with a restraining order for choking and threatening to kill his girlfriend. His crimes ended with the brutal rape of an older woman.

      But the SIV lobby doesn’t care about the woman he nearly killed. Or the threat to Americans.

      District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan, an Obama appointee involved in controversial decisions, like inventing a right to taxpayer-funded abortions for illegal migrants, ruled that the Trump administration must immediately start processing visa applications for SIV migrants and bring them to America.

      Meanwhile the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020 provided 4,000 more SIV slots for Afghans.

      Shutting down the SIV pipeline has been painfully difficult because the refugee program has broad bipartisan support from both Democrats and Republicans in Congress, and from military brass.

      In this case, it’s actually the bureaucracy that has saved American lives by slowing SIV visa processing.

      The United States has spent years figuring out exactly how to throw in the towel in Afghanistan through some sort of meaningless deal with the Taliban, even as we continue passing out SIV visas to Afghan employees in a country we may be leaving at any time. And we are handing out SIV visas like candy to Iraqis even though we have a very limited military presence there that is not expected to last for long.

      But facts have never stopped the SIV express from barreling through America at an incredible cost.

      85% of SIV recipients have received refugee resettlement benefits. Over 17,000 have been dumped in California, over 10,000 in Texas, and over 7,000 in Virginia. In Virginia, that meant that over 800 Iraqi children and almost 2,000 Afghan children became part of the system. In Northern Virginia, SIV holders increased tenfold and doubled in just one year, putting a potential terrorist population close to the center of government, to top terror targets, including the headquarters of the CIA in Fairfax County.

      Meanwhile a GAO report found that 60% of SIV refugees were unemployed after three months and 94% were on food stamps.

      70% of Iraqi SIVs were unemployed.

      In one single year, SIV refugees racked up $80 million in federal aid from two agencies alone. That doesn’t account for some federal refugee assistance programs that go on for as long as 5 years.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      How many American soldiers could have been trained to speak Arabic or Pashto for that money?

      As their number has grown, so has the monumental expense of subsidizing them. In 2008, SIV refugees accounted for only 1% of resettlement assistance. By 2017, SIV refugees made up a quarter of costs.

      After 75,000 Iraqi and Afghan SIV recipients, maybe it’s time that we shut down the SIV scam, instead of expanding it, as politicians from both parties and Pentagon brass, keep insisting that we must do.

      We currently have 14,000 troops in Afghanistan and over 55,000 Afghans here through the SIV program. There are 5,200 American military personnel in Iraq and over 20,000 Iraqis through the SIV program in America. We’ve resettled enough “interpreters” to fill Kalamazoo, Wilmington, or Boca Raton.

      America is all “interpreted” out.

      The US Army began deploying the Machine Foreign Language Translation System (MFLTS) in 2011. Millions of dollars have been signed in contracts for MFLTS systems that can provide automatic translations of Arabic, Pashto, Urdu, and many other languages. The system was deployed in 2017.

      MFLTS is no doubt inferior to living translators. But software doesn’t shoot our soldiers in the back, rape women in Colorado Springs, demand food stamps, swamp social services in Virginia, or join ISIS.


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 23:30

    • "Sick People" – Russian Lawmakers Blast US For Nuclear War Exercise 
      “Sick People” – Russian Lawmakers Blast US For Nuclear War Exercise 

      US Defense Secretary Mark Esper participated in a war exercise late last week at the United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) HQ in Omaha, Nebraska, which featured how the Pentagon would respond to a Russian nuclear attack on Europe, reported Defense One

      “We conducted a mini-exercise,” a senior defense official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. “The scenario included a European contingency where you are conducting a war with Russia and Russia decides to use a low-yield limited nuclear weapon against the site on NATO territory, and then you go through the conversation that you would have with the secretary of defense and then with the president ultimately to decide how to respond.”

      “During the exercise, we simulated responding with a nuclear weapon,” the official said.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      News of the “mini-exercise” immediately traveled to Moscow. Russian lawmakers called the Pentagon’s nuclear war simulation completely outrageous: 

      Senator Sergei Tsekov called organizers and participants of the exercise “sick people,” telling RBC News on Saturday, that he was “very surprised, frankly, very much, that they are doing this and also declare it. Although, on the other hand, judging by their current state and current actions, why be surprised?” 

      Alexander Sherin, the deputy head of the Duma’s defense committee, told HCH news on Saturday that the US’ nuclear war simulation with Russia has several objectives: 

      “Firstly, the population is getting used to such an incredible scenario for resolving the conflict as a nuclear strike between the Russian Federation and the NATO bloc. Secondly, an attempt to intimidate the population of Europe and justify the presence of American bases in European countries as guarantors of security and defenders in the event of a nuclear attack from Russia,” Sherin said.

      He said it would be foolish for Moscow to launch nuclear strikes on European countries because the fallout would flow back into Russia.

      Sherin says the reason the US nonchalantly leaks its nuclear war exercises to the media is because it has never had a major war on its soil, unlike Europe and Russia. 

      The latest drill comes as President Trump’s gargantuan military budget of more than $740 billion has allocated a whopping $44 billion for nuclear weapons. 

      Peter Kuznick, the director of the American University’s Nuclear Studies Institute, told RT News there is no such thing of limited nuclear war. 

      Kuznick said how these things play out is that both sides will continue shooting atomic weapons at one another until the human civilization is completely wiped out.

      The exercise comes weeks after we reported the US added a ‘low yield’ nuclear weapon to its submarine arsenal in a controversial first in decades.  

      Trump’s soaring military budget has led to the most significant increase in global military spending in more than a decade suggests governments across the world are preparing for the next big conflict.  


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 23:05

    • Bloomberg "Tried To Ruin Me For Speaking Out" On China
      Bloomberg “Tried To Ruin Me For Speaking Out” On China

      Authored by Leta Hong Fincher via The Intercept,

      I am one of the many women Mike Bloomberg’s company tried to silence through nondisclosure agreements. The funny thing is, I never even worked for Bloomberg.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      But my story shows the lengths that the Bloomberg machine will go to in order to avoid offending Beijing. Bloomberg’s company, Bloomberg LP, is so dependent on the vast China market for its business that its lawyers threatened to devastate my family financially if I didn’t sign an NDA silencing me about how Bloomberg News killed a story critical of Chinese Communist Party leaders. It was only when I hired Edward Snowden’s lawyers in Hong Kong that Bloomberg LP eventually called off their hounds after many attempts to intimidate me.

      In 2012, I was working toward a Ph.D. in sociology at Tsinghua University in Beijing, and my husband, Michael Forsythe, was a lead writer on a Bloomberg News article about the vast accumulation of wealth by relatives of Chinese President Xi Jinping, part of an award-winning “Revolution to Riches” series about Chinese leaders.

      Soon after Bloomberg published the article on Xi’s family wealth in June 2012, my husband received death threats conveyed by a woman who told him she represented a relative of Xi. The woman conveying the threats specifically mentioned the danger to our whole family; our two children were 6 and 8 years old at the time. The New Yorker’s Evan Osnos reports a similar encounter in his award-winning book, “Age of Ambition: Chasing Fortune, Truth and Faith in the New China,” when the same woman told Osnos’s wife: “He [Forsythe] and his family can’t stay in China. It’s no longer safe,” she said. “Something will happen. It will look like an accident. Nobody will know what happened. He’ll just be found dead.”

      The experience was especially terrifying because it came just months after the murder of a British businessman, Neil Heywood, who was poisoned by the wife of a senior Chinese leader, Bo Xilai, according to Chinese state media. His body was reportedly discovered in a hotel in the southwestern Chinese city of Chongqing. While our family spent the kids’ summer vacation in 2012 outside of China, Bloomberg executives kept my husband busy in nonstop conference calls about how to maintain our security. I had recurring nightmares about my young children getting beaten up or killed. I desperately wanted to speak publicly about the death threats, feeling it would give us stronger protection, but Bloomberg News wanted us not to say anything about it while the company conducted its own internal investigation. I had been loyal to the company ever since my husband and I married in 2002, and I didn’t want to jeopardize his job. I stayed silent until October 26, 2012, when another (unrelated) story was published in defiance of the Chinese government. I decided to tweet that we had received death threats after the Bloomberg story on Xi Jinping.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Screenshot: Leta Hong Fincher

      Within hours of my tweets — the original and my replies to questions — a Bloomberg manager called my husband and said, “Get your wife to delete her tweets.” I did not delete them, but I also did not tweet or speak publicly about the death threats again. I did not want to anger the company because we needed it to relocate us to Hong Kong, where our children would be safe. As we finished the remainder of our time in Beijing, applying for schools in Hong Kong and preparing for our move, I lived in constant fear. Would someone get to our children while they were on their way to or from school? Who was watching and listening to us? I obsessively pulled down all our window blinds at night in case Chinese security agents were watching us. I was careful not to speak loudly about our plans in our home or on my phone in case we were bugged.

      In August 2013, I finally relaxed as we flew out of Beijing and moved to a temporary apartment in Hong Kong. I thought that our yearlong nightmare had ended. But things would soon get even worse.

      My husband had been working for many months on another investigative report for Bloomberg about financial ties between one of China’s richest men, Wang Jianlin, and the families of senior Communist Party officials, including relatives of Xi. Bloomberg editors had thus far backed the story. A Bloomberg managing editor, Jonathan Kaufman, said in an email in late September 2013, “I am in awe of the way you tracked down and deciphered the financial holdings and the players. … It’s a real revelation. Looking forward to pushing it up the line,” according to an account published by the Financial Times.

      Then Bloomberg killed the story at the last minute, and the company fired my husband in November after comments by Bloomberg News editor-in-chief Matt Winkler were leaked.

      “If we run the story, we’ll be kicked out of China,” Winkler reportedly said on a company call.

      Mike Bloomberg, then New York City mayor and majority owner of Bloomberg LP, was asked on November 12, 2013, about reports that his company had self-censored out of fear of offending the Chinese government and he dismissed the question.

      “Nobody thinks that we’re wusses and not willing to stand up and write stories that are of interest to the public and that are factually correct,” Bloomberg told a press conference.

      Yet, days after Bloomberg made those comments to reporters in New York, Bloomberg lawyers in Hong Kong threatened to devastate my family financially by forcing us to repay the company for our relocation fees to Hong Kong from Beijing and the advance on my husband’s salary that we took out, leave us with no health insurance or income, and take me to court if I did not sign a nondisclosure agreement — even though I had never been a Bloomberg employee.

      The law firm representing Bloomberg, Mayer Brown JSM, sent a letter to my lawyer on December 6, 2013, threatening a court injunction if I didn’t agree to their confidentiality terms within seven days.

      I told my husband’s lawyer that I did not want to sign a gag order, so Bloomberg summoned me and my husband to a meeting on December 16 at Mayer Brown JSM’s office in central Hong Kong. We sat around a fancy conference table with some Bloomberg senior editors and Mayer Brown lawyers and spoke via videoconference with a lawyer from Willkie, Farr & Gallagher, representing Bloomberg in New York. My husband’s lawyer said that I did not possess any recordings or emails that might be damaging evidence about the company’s practices.

      “But what about all the evidence that is in her head?” said the outsized man on the video screen. When Bloomberg’s lawyer in New York uttered those words, I suddenly pictured him holding a giant vacuum cleaner, trying to suck all the memories out of my brain. I told everyone that I needed to leave the room and I walked out of the building, determined to go down fighting.

      On December 20, they sent a letter to my husband demanding that I sign a nondisclosure agreement. If I didn’t agree, we might owe the company thousands of dollars. I might even have had to pay Bloomberg’s legal bills. The thought of Bloomberg possibly ruining our family financially if I didn’t give in to their threats made me sick, but I was also infuriated that they had kept us in harm’s way after we received threats, forbidden me from speaking publicly about the death threats we received in Beijing, and now were trying to take away my freedom of speech forever.

      It was only when I hired Snowden’s lawyers in Hong Kong — Albert Ho and Jonathan Man offered me a low rate because it was a “good cause” — that Bloomberg finally backed off. In the meantime, they had sent me several more threatening letters. One letter from Mayer Brown JSM on January 8, 2014, spelled out that “by virtue of the knowledge that she retains (in her head) of our client’s [Bloomberg’s] Confidential Information she has an ongoing duty of confidentiality to our client.” They demanded that I sign away my right to speak out about things such as “unpublished drafts of an article prepared for our client; documents concerning our client’s newsgathering, editorial processes and editorial judgment …; any emails and other communications (including oral discussions) between and among our client’s employees concerning our client’s newsgathering editorial processes and editorial judgment.”

      Ho, a veteran Hong Kong pro-democracy legislator and activist who has been assaulted twice over the years, told me that if Bloomberg didn’t back down, we could hold a press conference to shame them. Fortunately, it didn’t come to that and in February 2014, Bloomberg finally stopped sending me legal threats. I returned to Tsinghua University to finish my Ph.D. and published my first book about women in China. My husband joined the New York Times, re-reported the entire story on the Chinese businessman, Wang, which Bloomberg claimed was “not ready for publication,” and his story was published on the front page of the New York Times in late April 2015.

      I never wanted to seek publicity about Bloomberg’s threatening behavior and was genuinely terrified of financial ruin, so in spite of preserving my freedom of speech, I have never written about my experience before. I am speaking out now because unlike so many other women, I am not bound by a nondisclosure agreement. Given the large number of women silenced by NDAs, it’s clear that there has been an environment of sexism at Bloomberg’s company. Bloomberg managers and lawyers treated me as though I were a piece of company property, an appendage of my husband, using intimidation and threats to try to bully me into submission. I agonized over whether to sign the NDA and I remember feeling physically suffocated, as though my mouth were stuffed with cotton balls. I haven’t met any of the other women, but I imagine that they, too, may have experienced the same terror of being threatened by a multibillion-dollar corporation, which could ruin their lives if they did not comply. Even now, I am nervous about the consequences of speaking out. But the more of us speak out, the stronger we are.


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 22:40

    • "Range Beyond 1,000 Miles" – Leaked Images Reveal US Army Super Cannon 
      “Range Beyond 1,000 Miles” – Leaked Images Reveal US Army Super Cannon 

      We noted last Oct. the US Army was developing a “powerful cannon that can fire a projectile over a distance of more than 1,150 nautical miles,” or about the distance from New York City to Tennessee. 

      The Strategic Long-Range Cannon (SLRC) is a “game-changing” weapon to counter China and Russia at great distances enters the first round of live-testing in 2023. 

      Over the weekend, Defense Blog published a piece detailing how the Army “accidentally revealed the first images” of the new super cannon during a US-UK Modernization Demonstration Event.

      The alleged pictures of the new cannon were shared by the US Army CCDC Army Research Laboratory at an event on Feb. 20 at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. 

      “The @USArmy hosted a US-UK Modernization Demonstration Event Feb. 20 at @USAGAPG to identify capability collaboration to the British Army. Officials from @ArmyFutures @USArmyCCDC , the centers and the lab, briefed interoperability to minimize risks of #modernization divergence.,” @ArmyResearchLab tweeted.

      Other photos posted on Twitter detailed how the projectile can travel more than 1,000 nautical miles. Here’s one of the leaked images: 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      And another:

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      It seems that the GI. Joe brand owned by the toy company Hasbro has already created a futuristic toy called the “Thurnderclap,” which looks very similar to the super cannon.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      However, super cannon is nothing new. The V-3 was a German World War II large-caliber cannon that filed projectiles upwards of 102 miles. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      A bloated national defense budget has given the Army the ability to develop their wildest weapons – such as a super cannon. More government waste as war spending will bankrupt the nation


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 22:15

    • Political Bias And Anti-Americanism On College Campuses
      Political Bias And Anti-Americanism On College Campuses

      Authored by Walter Williams, op-ed via Townhall.com,

      A recent Pew Research Center survey finds that only half of American adults think colleges and universities are having a positive effect on our nation. The leftward political bias, held by faculty members affiliated with the Democratic Party, at most institutions of higher education explains a lot of that disappointment. Professors Mitchell Langbert and Sean Stevens document this bias in “Partisan Registration and Contributions of Faculty in Flagship Colleges.”

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Langbert and Stevens conducted a new study of the political affiliation of 12,372 professors in the two leading private and two leading public colleges in 31 states.

      • For party registration, they found a Democratic to Republican (D:R) ratio of 8.5:1, which varied by rank of institution and region.

      • For donations to political candidates (using the Federal Election Commission database), they found a D:R ratio of 95:1, with only 22 Republican donors, compared with 2,081 Democratic donors.

      Several consistent findings have emerged from Langbert and Stevens’ study. The ratio of faculty who identify as or are registered as Democratic versus Republican almost always favors the Democratic Party. Democratic professors outnumber their Republican counterparts most in the humanities and social sciences, compared with the natural sciences and engineering.

      The ratio is 42:1 in anthropology, 27:1 in sociology and 27:1 in English. In the social sciences, Democratic registered faculty outnumber their Republican counterparts the least in economics 3:1. The partisan political slant is most extreme at the most highly rated institutions.

      The leftist bias at our colleges and universities has many harmful effects. Let’s look at a few.

      • At University of California, Davis, last month, a mathematics professor faced considerable backlash over her opposition to the requirement for faculty “diversity statements.”

      • University of California, San Diego, requires job applicants to admit to the “barriers” preventing women and minorities from full participation in campus life.

      • At American University, a history professor recently wrote a book in which he advocates repealing the Second Amendment.

      • A Rutgers University professor said, “Watching the Iowa Caucus is a sickening display of the over-representation of whiteness.”

      • University of California, Berkeley, professor and former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich chimed in to say: “Think about this: Iowa is 90.7% white. Iowa is now the only state with a lifetime voting ban for people with a felony conviction. Black people make up 4% of Iowa’s population but 26% of the prison population. How is this representative of our electorate?”

      • A Williams College professor said he would advocate for social justice to be included in math textbooks.

      • Students at Wayne State University no longer have to take a single math course to graduate; however, they may soon be required to take a diversity course.

      Then there’s a question about loyalty to our nation.

      Charles Lieber, former chairman of the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard, was arrested earlier this year on accusations that he made a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statement about work he did for a program run by the Chinese government that seeks to lure American talent to China.

      He was paid $50,000 a month and up to $158,000 in living expenses for his work, which involved cultivating young teachers and students, according to court documents. According to the Department of Justice, Lieber helped China “cultivate high-level scientific talent in furtherance of China’s scientific development, economic prosperity and national security.”

      It’s not just Harvard professors.

      • Newly found court records reveal that Emory University neuroscientist Li Xiao-Jiang was fired in late 2019 after being charged with lying about his own ties to China. Li was part of the same Chinese program as Lieber.

      • A jury found a University of California, Los Angeles, professor guilty of exporting stolen U.S. military technology to China. Newsweek reported that he was convicted June 26 on 18 federal charges.

      • Meanwhile, NBC reported that federal prosecutors say that University of Texas professor Bo Mao attempted to steal U.S. technology by using his position as a professor to obtain access to protected circuitry and then handing it over to the Chinese telecommunications giant, Huawei.

      The true tragedy is that so many Americans are blind to the fact that today’s colleges and universities pose a threat on several fronts to the well-being of our nation.


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 21:50

    • "Tsunami-Like" Coronavirus Floods South Korea With New Cases; Europe Begins To Isolate Italy: Live Updates
      “Tsunami-Like” Coronavirus Floods South Korea With New Cases; Europe Begins To Isolate Italy: Live Updates

      Summary:

      • In a report that was 4 hours “late”, China reported an additional 409 coronavirus cases across the entire nation, and 150 additional deaths as of February 23 compared to 648 additional cases and 97 deaths on February 22; this brought total China cases to 77150 and total deaths 2592
        • China’s Hubei province said it has 398 New Coronavirus Cases As Of Feb 23 and 149 New Coronavirus Deaths.
      • South Korea raised its national threat level to “red alert” for the first time since the H1N1 swine flu outbreak in 2009. The total number of confirmed cases in the country reached 763, a jump of 161 overnight, and a 25-fold increase in the past week.
      • The Italian government said it has 152 confirmed cases, up from three in a matter of days. Three people have died. Authorities have locked down about a dozen small towns and canceled events across the north, including Venice’s Carnival.
      • Iran has confirmed eight deaths related to the coronavirus, the most outside of China, media reported Sunday. South Korea confirmed its seventh death.
      • 4 more cases confirmed in UK
      • 200 Israelis quarantined
      • Japan confirms more cases; Japanese Emperor expresses hope for Tokyo Games
      • Trump says US has everything ‘under control’ as he asks Congress for more money
      • EU’s Gentiloni says he has ‘full confidence’ In Italian health officials
      • Turkey, Pakistan close borders with Iran as confirmed cases soar
      • Global Times says virus may not have originated at Hunan seafood market
      • Axios reports shortages of 150 essential drugs likely.

      * * *

      Update (2200ET): In a release that was about 4 hours late, China’s Hubei province said it has 398 New Coronavirus Cases As Of Feb 23 and 149 New Coronavirus Deaths. Overall, China reported an additional 409 coronavirus cases across the entire nation, and 150 additional deaths as of February 23 vs. 648 additional cases and 97 deaths on February 22. This brings the total number of cases across China to 77,150, and total deaths to 2592.

      None of these numbers are even remotely credible any more, and serve merely the propaganda purpose of giving the impression that Beijing is winning the war against the spread of the Coronavirus, when in reality nobody has any idea anymore what is going on on the ground in China, and is why workers refuse to show up to their place of business. Consider this: two days ago, WaPo reporters pointed to a clear case of manipulation where the authorities suppressed the true number of cases.

      Authorities in Hubei province reported good news Thursday: There were only 349 new coronavirus cases the previous day, the lowest tally in weeks. The bad – and puzzling – news? Wuhan, the capital of Hubei, reported 615 new cases all by itself.

      And then there was the Hunan doctor who said he had treated no less than 50 patients with coronavirus on the same day official data reported just one new case.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      * * *

      Update (2015 ET): The epidemic in South Korea is accelerating exponentially, with the country reporting 161 additional virus cases, bringing the total of 763, a 25-fold increase in cases in one week, along with two more deaths bringing the death toll there to seven. The Kospi is continuing its decline and is down 3.0% and approached the 2100 level on the downside.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      More ominously, the number of cases under inspection is nearly 10,000.

      Earlier in the day, S.Korea elevated the virus alert level to “red”, the highest in its four-tier system. According to Yonhap, in escalating the virus alert level, President Moon said, “a few days from now is a watershed moment.” In the first 30 days, S. Korea seemed to have been effectively combating the Covid-19. But within the past few days, the number of confirmed cases spiked, first linked to a religious sect and now starting to spread across the country. Yet, the city of Daegu and the Gyeongbuk area have a higher concentration of virus cases – representing 84% of the total number of infections – than other regions. Tied to this, the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) estimates 329 cases, accounting for more than half of the total cases, to be related to the church services.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Medics in protective gear spray disinfectant at a market in the South Korean city of Daegu on Sunday

      The following chart shows the geometric spread of new cases in several countries, including Italy, Japan, South Korea and Iran.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      * * *

      Update (1915ET): Austria’s state railroad has halted at least three trains traveling from Italy via the Brenner Pass in response to a rash of virus cases in its southern neighbor, officials said.

      Meanwhile, Hong Kong warned that the “Tsunami-like” event from the virus in Hong Kong is devastating businesses already hobbled by months of anti-government protests. As Bloomberg notes, unlike in the U.S. and rival Singapore, businesses in Hong Kong don’t have recourse to any corporate rescue procedure. The lack of a proper legal framework for bankruptcy protection means companies are forced into liquidation, according to Johnson Kong, the president of the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

      * * *

      Update (1820ET): White House trade adviser Peter Navarro says the crisis shows, “not surprisingly,” that the U.S. has offshored too much of its supply chain. Navarro expressed confidence on Fox’s Sunday Morning Futures, saying the “American economy is exceedingly strong and not particularly vulnerable to what happens in China.” He emphasized his goal to bring more of the U.S. supply chain home. “A lot of it is in China, some of it is in India, some in Europe, but we’ve got to get that back on shore,” he said.

      * * *

      Update (1615ET): The Italian government said it has 152 confirmed cases, up from three in a matter of days. Three people have died. Authorities have locked down about a dozen small towns and canceled events across the north, including Venice’s Carnival. Italian authorities reported cases in three regions: 110 in Lombardy; 21 in Veneto and nine in Emilia Romagna. Of those, 25 are in intensive care.

      * * *

      Update (1415ET): The Epoch Times Jennifer Zeng reporting once again that the crematoriums in Wuhan are working overtime.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      Still believe those official numbers?

      * * *

      Update (1345ET): G-20 finance ministers and central bankers who met in Riyadh yesterday for the latest G-20 summit said their countries stand ready to take action if the outbreak drags on the global economy. At this point, a massive hit to global GDP is looking inevitable.

      Meanwhile, Bloomberg reports that Zhou Dewen, the chairman of the Small and Medium Business Development Association in the city of Wenzhou, believes the coronavirus outbreak is the worst public health crisis he’s seen in his 40 years since China started its economic liberalization.

      In fact, he said, it is “the most severe” of any crisis in the 40 years since China embarked on major economic reforms. He sees not a double but a “triple whammy,” factoring in the economic slowdown the country was experiencing even before the trade conflict and the virus.

      That sounds about right. And now we’re finding patients can go 27 days without showing symptoms.

      * * *

      Update (1230ET): The number of new coronavirus cases in Japan has risen to 135, while 57 new ‘Diamond Princess’ cases have been confirmed days after hundreds were released from a two-week quarantine. As we mentioned earlier, a third passenger has also died, according to Japan’s NHK.

      One of the cases, according to the Japan Times, is a woman who was reportedly let off the cruise ship as the quarantine ended. Of course, every expert in the world including the CDC warned Japan that this would happen since health officials didn’t seem to have m much of an after-care plan. Alas, here we are.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Three boys who have been confirmed to be infected with the virus are now Japan’s youngest cases. They include a preschooler in Saitama and two brothers in a Hokkaido elementary school. It’s the first time people under the age of 10 have caught the virus in Japan. While the younger boy had recently traveled to Wuhan with his father, authorities have no explanation for how the two brothers in Hokkaido became infected.

      Emperor Naruhito cancelled a public event on Sunday, and also reportedly expressed some alarm about the virus and the Tokyo Olympics. Naruhito, who turned 60 on Sunday, ascended to the throne last spring after his father became the first Japanese emperor in 2 centuries to abdicate.

      He said he was looking forward to this summer’s games, adding that the ’64 Tokyo games were a special memory in his childhood, Reuters reports.

      “This new coronavirus is a concern. I would like to send my sympathies to those who are infected and their families,” he said.

      “At the same time, my thoughts are with the efforts of those who are treating them and working hard to prevent the spread of the infection. I hope their efforts will bear fruit soon.”

      Tokyo will host the Summer Olympics from July 24 for the second time, and Naruhito said the first Tokyo games, held in October 1964 when he was four years old, were one of the highlights of his childhood.

      The Tokyo Olympics are the major barometer right now. If they get cancelled, then the world will know: This outbreak is out of control.

      * * *

      Update (1220ET): Let’s check in with one country that we neglected to mention earlier in today’s roundup of outbreak-related news.

      Haaertz reports that 200 Israelis are under quarantine after nine Korean tourists tested positive for the virus following a return trip from Israel. Yesterday, Tel Aviv issued travel warnings for South Korea and Japan (they’ve also barred foreigners who’ve recently been to either country from entering Israel).

      Those under quarantine include people who came into contact with the Koreans.

      * * *

      Update (1145ET): Italian authorities have confirmed a third coronavirus-linked death in northern Italy. Officials confirmed that 50,000 remain under lockdown across 12 villages in the north.

      As a reminder, Italy’s first cases surfaced in early February, when a Chinese couple on vacation in Rome fell ill. Now, priests celebrating mass on Sunday across Italy have been ordered by the bishops to make a few changes to procedure, for safety’s sake.

      Bishops in several dioceses in northern Italy issued directives that holy water fonts be kept empty, that communion wafers be placed in the hands of the faithful and not directly into their mouths by priests celebrating Mass and that congregants refrain from shaking hands or exchanging kisses during the symbolic Sign of the Peace ritual.

      * * *

      Update (1130ET): The BBC reports that four of the 32 British passengers aboard the ‘Diamond Princess’ cruise ship that have been taken to the quarantine at Arrowe Park have tested positive for the virus, the UK’s Chief Medical Officer said.

      This brings the UK’s total case number to 13.

      * * *

      Bernie Sanders has won the Nevada caucus, and coronavirus outbreaks are taking root in a handful of countries outside China, threatening a genuine pandemic and threatening to pop the market’s dismissive bubble by proving unequivocally that this is not ‘just another flu’.

      We’re starting our Sunday roundup with South Korea which, along with Italy and Japan, is one of a handful of countries outside China that is genuinely in crisis. On Sunday, the South Korean government raised the national threat level to “red alert”, its highest threat level (like, North Korean troops on the move to Seoul-level) after 169 new cases were confirmed on Sunday, raising the national toll total to 602.

      South Korean President Moon Jae-in warned on Sunday that the outbreak had reached a “critical watershed” moment, and that “the next few days will be a very important critical moment.” He then asked health authorities to take “unprecedented, powerful” steps to contain the virus – and it appears they’re already starting to do just that, as the FT reports.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      As one can see from this chart, the bulk of new cases confirmed over the weekend have been in the ex-China, ex-Diamond Princess category:

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The Italian government is taking similar steps after confirming 133 cases, up from just three less than 72 hours ago. In that time, Italy has become host to the largest coronavirus outbreak outside Asia.

      As Rome scrambles to contain the outbreak, authorities on Sunday banned all public gatherings, including Venice’s famed carnival celebrations that honor the beginning of Lent. The last two days of the carnival have been cancelled as fashion week in Milan was also cancelled, forcing the cancellation of the famed Giorgio Armani show, which had been scheduled for Sunday afternoon.

      Carnivale drew tens of thousands of revelers to the region which unfortunately is home to one of several clusters of outbreaks in Northern Italy.

      While Italy’s impoverished south has so far done little to prepare for the outbreak, in the north, museums, schools, universities and other public venues will be closed in Venice, as well as the rest of the Veneto region, through March 1.

      According to ABC, three patients in Venice have tested positive for the COVID-19 virus, all of them in their late 80s and who are hospitalized in critical condition.

      Most of Italy’s cases are clustered in the north, where the most extreme lockdowns are being implemented. 25 cases have been isolated in Veneto, and the rest in Lombardy, with authorities still unable to track down the source of the virus. The first case was discovered last week when an Italian man in Codogno in his late 30s became seriously ill.

      In Turin, the biggest and most economically vital city of the Piedmont region, three cases have now been diagnosed, and a family of three are being tested, according to authorities.

      “The health officials haven’t been yet able to pinpoint Patient Zero,”Angelo Borrelli, head of the national Civil Protection agency, told reporters in Rome.

      Initially, authorities believed this man was infected by an Italian friend with whom he had recently dined, and who also had just returned from Shanghai.  When the friend tested negative for the virus, attention turned to several Chinese who live in town and who frequent the same restaurant. Regional Gov. Attilio Fontana said they tested negative, too.

      And they’re still not sure if he’s ‘patient zero’.

      Across Italy, millions of Italians are preparing to be on lockdown for weeks, as many are hoarding essential supplies.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      With 90 confirmed cases in Lombardy, the region has closed schools and universities, sporting events, other public events – and even catholic mass.

      More bad news out of Hubei followed on Sunday, as Wuhan’s Union Jiangbei Hospital confirmed the death of a 29-year-old doctor.  That’s the second death of a young doctor in Hubei in a matter of days (another doctor died late last week). Their deaths have stirred up memories of Dr. Li, a martyr of the virus and symbol of Beijing’s missteps.

      As we noted last night, Hubei reported ~600 new cases on Saturday but nobody really believes the Chinese numbers anymore.

      As Beijing tries to convince the world and its population that everything is under control, European Commission finance chief Paolo Gentiloni said the EU recently delivered 25 tonnes of protective equipment to China to help it contain the outbreak.

      Looking inward, Gentiloni warned there is “no need to panic” about the outbreak in Italy, even though 2 people have died and more than 100 have been confirmed to be infected. “The EU has full confidence in the Italian authorities and the decisions they are taking,” he said.

      “We share concern for possible contagion, but there is no need to panic.”

      We suspect he will soon eat those words.

      As the Trump administration confronts the unavoidable reality that it badly miscalculated by bringing those 14 sick passengers on the evacuation flight with ~300 seemingly healthy Americans from the Diamond Princess, Japanese officials confirmed on Sunday the third death among the ~2,600 passengers who traveled on the ship (along with another 1,000+ crew).

      The ‘Diamond Princes’ remains the largest outbreak outside mainland China – but South Korea has probably already surpassed it, health authorities just haven’t been able to test sick patients fast enough.

      Meanwhile, President Trump assured the public that the virus is “under control” in the US just as he reportedly asked Congress to authorize federal funds to combat the virus as the CDC warns only three states are truly prepared. This after 25 Senate Dems sent him a letter demanding that he act – a superficial political ploy – some are worried that the $1 billion Trump is asking for is ‘too small’. Seems to us that it makes sense to start small, then increase the ask as the situation evolves.

      Elsewhere in the US, reports on Sunday claimed 325 People in Michigan were being monitored, all of whom had recently been to mainland China, according to local health authorities.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Nearly all of South Korea’s coronavirus cases have been linked to two clusters at a church in southern city of Daegu and a nearby hospital in Cheongdo County – though cases have popped up seemingly without explanation, a phenomenon that is unnerving health officials around the world (Japan has faced a similar problem).

      Yonhap reports scenes familiar to those who watched Wuhan’s initial virus response: Exhausted health-care workers sleeping on benches outside hospitals.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The South Korean government has declared ‘special management zones’ in both areas – a kind of voluntary lockdown order. From what observers can tell, it seems to be working, because Daegu’s streets are abandoned, according to seemingly every report.

      As the public searches for somebody to blame for the outbreak, the public fury appears to be pointed at the cult-like church where a ‘super-spreader member who thought she just had a bad cold infected dozens of others, kicking of the outbreak in earnest.

      Rumors and reports are circulating claiming the church isn’t cooperating with the South Korean government.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      But nowhere outside of Hubei is the outbreak worse than in Iran. The country’s utter lack of health-care resources combined with a bitter and oppressive regime already struggling with an US-manufactured economic crisis and a leadership that just accidentally killed ~200 innocent people, including dozens of students, has left it completely vulnerable.

      Alarmed by their neighbors’ outbreak, Turkey and Pakistan have closed their borders with Iran in an effort to stop the spread.

      In just a matter of days, the death toll in Iran has climbed to 8 on Sunday. Assuming a mortality rate of 2%, that would imply Iran had ~400 cases one month ago when these patients were likely infected. That means there could be thousands of cases roaming around the country already. The biggest clusters so far have been reported in Qoms and in Tehran, the capital. In response, all schools in Tehran have been shuttered until further notice, and the government is telling citizens to avoid any gatherings or leaving their homes at all, if possible.

      As medical workers literally throw everything they have at the virus, using AIDS drugs that have been found to be effective as well as therapies that work on flu patients, Axios reports that the global outbreak could soon cause shortages of 150 prescription drugs.

      Before we go, we’d like to point out one interesting piece that we found in the Global Times – literally the most unlikeliest of places. As Beijing begins to push a narrative blaming the US for the outbreak (we know, we know), Chinese propaganda is already sowing the seeds of doubt. The virus didn’t originate in the Hunan seafood market where an illegal wildlife trade helped it pass from bats or snakes to humans. No, it was ‘introduced’ to workers at the market via human-to-human transmission via an unknown third party.

      This according to Chinese “researchers”.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      So much for Mike Bloomberg’s insistence that nothing can stop the inexorable march of globalization.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      We’ll see about that.


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 21:28

    • High-Income Taxpayers Now Confronted At Home By IRS Agents
      High-Income Taxpayers Now Confronted At Home By IRS Agents

      The IRS announced Wednesday that it would increase at-home visitations to high-income taxpayers who haven’t filed tax returns on time. 

      Remember when the IRS under the Obama administration targeted conservative groups? Now it appears this anti-wealth attitude extends to anyone earning over $100,000 that hasn’t filed a return since 2018 or prior years. 

      During an at-home visit, IRS agents will inform the non-compliant taxpayer how to file returns and show them a pathway of regaining compliant status. 

      Uncle Sam wants his goddamn money! 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      “The IRS is committed to fairness in the tax system, and we want to remind people across all income categories that they need to file their taxes,” said Paul Mamo, Director of Collection Operations, Small Business/Self Employed Division. “These visits focusing on high-income taxpayers will be taking place across the country.”

      Visitations have already started this month and will continue through March for severe cases of high-income taxpayers not filing. 

      In the last year, the agency started aggressively targeting low-income families who neglected to pay their taxes. These struggling folks in the “greatest economy ever” are barely surviving on depressed wages, insurmountable debts, and soaring housing and healthcare inflation, have no money left over to pay taxes. 

      If you’re rich or poor and haven’t paid your taxes in the last several years, watch out because Big Brother is now dispatching its agents to hunt you down. 

      And in case an agent confronts a non-compliant taxpayer – they will offer several options if the tax bill cannot be paid in full, such as a payment plan. But if a non-compliant taxpayer declines to pay, the IRS will inform the individual that they will pursue them in court. 

      Land of the free? Not when it comes to debt…

      And here’s the most bizarre move the IRS made before they launched a massive campaign across the country to confront rich and poor non-compliant taxpayers. The agency bought 5,000 guns, some automatic weapons, and 5 million rounds of ammunition. 

       “Among the agencies being supplied with night-vision equipment, body armor, hollow-point bullets, shotguns, drones, assault rifles, and LP gas cannons are the Smithsonian, U.S. Mint, Health and Human Services, IRS, FDA, Small Business Administration, Social Security Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Education Department, Energy Department, Bureau of Engraving and Printing and an assortment of public universities,” said john Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The militarization of the IRS? 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Seriously, why do IRS agents need AR-15 rifles?  To collect all the money that is owed, of course! 


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 21:25

    • Chinese Workers Refuse To Go Back To Work Despite Beijing's Demands
      Chinese Workers Refuse To Go Back To Work Despite Beijing’s Demands

      When we commented earlier that the coronavirus pandemic means that the vast majority of Chinese small and medium enterprises (SMEs) have at most 2-3 months of cash left, a potentially catastrophic outcome that will not only crippled China’s economy but its $40 trillion financial system, we summarized the circular quandary in which Beijing finds itself, to wit:

      … unless China reboots its economy, it faces an economic shock the likes of which it has never seen before in modern times. Yet it can’t reboot the economy unless it truly stops the viral pandemic, something it will never be able to do if it lies to the population that the pandemic is almost over in hopes of forcing people to get back to work. Hence the most diabolic Catch 22 for China’s social and economic system, because whereas until now China could easily lie its way out of any problem, in this case lying will only make the underlying (viral pandemic) problem worse as sick people return to work, only to infect even more co-workers, forcing even more businesses to be quarantined.

      Shockingly (or perhaps not at all in light of China’s tremendous human rights record), Beijing has picked output over life expectancy, and in a furious scramble to restart its economy, which as we showed earlier remains flatlined…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      … according to most high-frequency metrics, it has been “advising” people to get back to work, even as new coronavirus cases are still coming in, in the process threatening to blow out the current epidemic with orders of magnitude more cases as places of employment become the new hubs of viral distribution.

      As Bloomberg picked up late on Sunday, following what we said earlier namely that “local governments around the country face a daunting question of whether to focus on staving off the virus or encourage factory reopenings” China’s central and local governments are one again easing the criteria for factories to resume operations “as they walk a tightrope between containing a virus that has killed more than 2,400 people and preventing a slump in the world’s second-largest economy.” This schizophrenic dilemma for a government which faces two equally terrible choices, was best summarized by the following two banners observed in China:

      • Banner 1 says: “If you go out messing around now, expect grass on your grave to grow soon.“
      • Banner 2 says, “Sitting at home eats up all your have, hurry up go out & find a job.”

      Indeed, a perfectly schizophrenic message from the government to the people:

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      And yet, even with both options equally terrible, Beijing also has no choice but to pick one. As a result, as Bloomberg writes, “the rush to restart has been propelled by China’s leader Xi Jinping and top leaders, who are urging companies to resume production so the country can continue to meet lofty goals for growth and economic development in 2020.”

      Regular Zero Hedge readers know the rest: with most of Chinese economic output paralyzed, officials in China’s provinces have taken up Xi’s call, with one region after another relaxing rules that had kept more than half the nation’s industrial base idle following the Lunar New Year holiday.

      So as China undergoes a wholesale push to reboot its economy, there is certainly some success. AS Bloomberg notes, “about 600 kilometers east of the virus epicenter of Wuhan, vendors and customers at the Yiwu wholesale market in Zhejiang province are having their body temperature tested at the entrances after the vast complex that wholesales manufactured goods reopened on Tuesday, three days earlier than expected. Power demand has also started to pick up in China, with six major generators reporting that coal consumption – while still below pre-holiday levels – rose 7% on Feb. 20 from the previous day.”

      Well, “pick up” may be a bit of an exageration but here it is: the smallest possible increment, yet still more than 50% below where it was on previous years, suggesting China’s economy is running at half of its capacity, which in GDP terms means an epic collapse, a lifetime away from the traditional 6%-7% Y/Y increase.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Ultimately, the core problem China is facing as we explained earlier today, is one of trust: trust by workers that their employers, and certainly the government, has their best interest in mind when it is urging everyone to get back to work. Or lack thereof.

      “Our factory is still missing quite a lot of workers, so we can only resume limited production,” said Dong Liu, vice president of a textile manufacturer in Fujian, southeastern China, that employs more than 400 workers. Dong said he applied to the government on Feb. 17 to restart and the inspector came the next day and gave permission. “More and more factories are allowed to reopen this week,” he said, although as they reopen, they find the problem mentioned before: nobody is gullible enough to go back to work. After all why risk it if a return to the place of work with the pandemic still raging means a material chance of a death sentence?

      Naturally, China’s massive population – while bombarded by propaganda on a daily basis – is hardly naive, and is very well attuned to what is really going on. And what is going on is that China’s economy has ground to a halt because nobody trusts the government anymore!

      Even Bloomberg admits it: “the push to get production rolling again risks a renewed spread of the virus, about which much is still not yet known” (it’s certainly not known where it came from after Chinese scientists disproved the widely held propaganda narrative that it miraculously emerged from some bat at the Wuhan seafood market during the peak of bat hibernation season).

      “A peak may come at the end of this month for the whole country but it won’t necessarily indicate a turning point,” Zhong Nanshan, a respiratory disease expert who led research into a treatment for SARS, told reporters in Guangzhou earlier this week. “The epidemic could have a new peak after people travel back to work.”

      The last sentence is predicated on two major assumptions:

      1. that workers will decide they want to return to work; and
      2. that they will consider the outsized risk to their lives from returning to work as lesser than the threat to their livelihood from not receiving a salary.

      And what happens if they all refuse to come back? What if China, sick of the lies and fabrications of its government, creates the largest, if completely unexpected, labor union in history and one which refuses to work and demands handouts from the government until the coronavirus pandemic is well and truly halted, something which can not be ascertained for a long, long time in light of the government’s flagrant and ongoing lies?

      Meanwhile, the government schizophrenic, contradictory instructions continue:

      “Every day several government departments send representatives to spot check our efforts to curb the virus,” said Melissa Shu, the company’s export manager. “They come from the district government, the center for disease control, the city government, at different times of day and check if we disinfect in time, whether we test the temperature of workers, whether workers have masks, whether one person has a separate lunch seat, whether lunch is properly arranged, etc, etc.”

      Shu said at lunchtime, workers need to sit at least one meter apart (about three feet).

      “As a result, we can’t ask all the workers to come to work even when they’re in town ready to work,” she said, adding that the plant has about 40-50 staff working in rotation, about half the number employed before the virus.

      Ironically, some Chinese factories already have plenty of space, thanks to the long-running trade war with the U.S.

      “Compared with the virus, that was much worse” said Hui Zhuo, founder of a wooden furniture manufacturer in Zhongshan, in the Pearl River Delta. “We’ve cut a lot of workers in the last two years — so I’m not too worried this time because the space in my factory is big enough to avoid being crowded.”

      And speaking of trade war, if the long-running feud between the US and China wasn’t enough for Chinese customers to seek alternative supply chains, the coronavirus fiasco is sure to be the tipping point:

      In the longer term, the outbreak is likely to exacerbate the damage wrought on China’s factories by the trade war. For some overseas customers in fast-moving industries like fashion, the factory shutdown amid the virus has been another wake-up call that may spur them to reduce their reliance on Chinese suppliers.

      “I think for the next season or the next year’s goods, retailers would be looking at sourcing more from other countries,” said AJ Mak, CEO of Chain of Demand, which provides artificial-intelligence systems to retailers in Asia and the U.S. to predict product demand. “I think those conversations which started from the trade war would be definitely accelerated.”

      The irony is that by the time most Chinese workers do return to their jobs, those jobs may not exist anymore.

      Meanwhile China’s push to salvage its growth targets won’t be complete until the virus is fully under control – something that is impossible to predict, and will in fact be delayed the more China pushes to restore full factory staffing:

      “When can everyone come back to work? No one knows,” said Shu at the Zhenjiang LED factory. “Logistics is still not yet fully resumed, inter-city transportation is still restricted. Only after the epidemic is fully controlled, we can truly return to normal work and life.“

      What we do know, is that for now, when given the choice of the carrot or the stick, Chinese employers and the government are picking the carrot… for now. As China’s Global Times reported, fabrication giants such as Apple supplier Foxconn have rolled out incentives to encourage workers to return to their posts amid the coronavirus pandemic. In fact, the company’s factory in Zhengzhou said it would award 7000 yuan to back-to-work staff and give bonuses in stages to workers who clock in for up to 55 days.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      So far such “carrot” approaches have failed to yield results, which leads us to think that a far worse eventuality is next: the stick.

      And if China’s population was already furious at the inept response to the coronavirus pandemic, the information blackout, the self-serving lies by the communist party over the past two months, and the general lack of respect for ordinary people by China’s billionaire oligarchs, one can only imagine what happens to the mood across China’s workforce – the largest in the world – once the entire nation becomes one giant gulag, where everyone is forced to work for the greater good, or else…


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 20:55

    • 10-Year Treasury Yield Plunges To Just 1 Basis Point Away From Recession "Tipping Point"
      10-Year Treasury Yield Plunges To Just 1 Basis Point Away From Recession “Tipping Point”

      After more than a month of shocking complacency (because what, central banks will somehow print antibodies and “fix” the covid pandemic which will restore collapsing global supply chains?) traders are “suddenly” realizing that the coronavirus outbreak contains a significant likelihood of impact to the global economy and the potential to become a black bat, pardon, black swan type event. An event which could quickly spiral into a US – and global – recession.

      How to determine if a recession is coming? One place to watch is the NY ‘sFed recession probability indicator, which is a function of the slope of the curve between 3m bills and the 10y rate and was developed using a logistic regression technique. As BofA writes, going back to 1960, there have been 8 recessions, but comparisons with the last 3 recession are likely more relevant. Chart 1 shows that within a 12-month window prior to each of the last 3 recessions, the probability exceeded 30%. If we look at all 8 recessions since 1960, we find that the critical 30% threshold remains relevant back to 1969 (7 recessions), but provided a false positive in 1967 and was not reached in the 1960 recession.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Yet while a 30% recession probability is still a gray zone, once the NY Fed’s indicator reached a level of 40% it has not provided any historical false positives.

      Why is this notable? Because in the Fed’s framework, the 40% level corresponds to a slope of -45bp between 3m bills and the 10y rate.

      Looking at the current cycle, not only is the current probability above 30%, but it was above 40% in August of 2019, when the world was flooded with recession fears and sent a record $17 trillion in global sovereign debt into negative yielding territory. The probability indicator declined post-August as the Fed’s 3 cuts steepened the curve, but given the current reading – and the August reading – versus the critical 30% level of the past 3 recessions, BofA warns that we “have to view the recession outcome as significant enough to consider hedging against.”

      Furthermore, when looking for recession proxy signals, BofA focuses squarely on the probability of a zero lower bound (i.e. fed funds rate cut to 0%) in 18 months (this is shown in chart 2 below). With this approach, BofA obtains roughly one in three chance of seeing the Fed at the ZLB by mid-2021, corroborating the above.

      What does all this mean for the 10Year Treasury as a recessionary signal?

      According to BofA, recent mini-cycle troughs have coincided with bottoms on 10y Treasury yields around 1.4% (as shown in chart 3 below for The Conference Board Leading Indicators and 10yT yields since the great recession).

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      More importantly, breaking through this “tipping point” level requires more than 50% probability priced for the Fed cutting rates back to 0%! This means that breaking 1.4% in an on-hold context for the Fed creates a significant inversion of the curve, pushes recession signals higher, and pressures a further inversion of the FF1/FF6 spread which we found in Pricing cuts ahead of the Fed to have no false positives for Fed cuts following a -30bp inversion (currently -16bp).

      As of open of trading on Sunday evening, the implied 10Y yield is 1.41%, or just 1 basis point above this critical “tipping point” below which trapdoors to both a recession and the Zero Lower Bound are open.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      What this means in practical terms from a duration perspective is that “the market may gap lower on a break below 1.4% for the 10Y Treasury”, as this corresponds to phase transition higher in recession probabilities and a clear challenge to the on-hold Fed stance, “particularly as convexity flows add to what would likely be a broader risk-off move.

      Finally, while the threshold for cuts is high – especially if a slowdown is driven by pandemic fears – and considering the Fed’s recent rhetoric which has sought to allay expectations of a rate cut as soon as June, once the Fed commits to cuts, BofA finds it unlikely that they will be the insurance style of 2019, and instead the Fed will proceed to cut all the way to zero to avert the coming recession. For the curve, this implies some scope for further bull flattening, but limited beyond 1.4% in the 10Y, as the Fed is likely to be more significantly priced in beyond this level.

      And while BofA goes on to list several ways to hedge this eventuality, the simple take home here is that if the 10Y tips below 1.40%, it will proceeds to plunge straight down, which in turn will force the Fed to change its “reaction function” again, and announce that an aggressive rate cut phase is coming, one which will be meant to offset what the market is now saying is a virtually assured recession. It also means that anyone hoping the Fed will further taper its QE4 in coming months is in for a rude awakening.


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 20:44

    • Pizza Hut's Largest Franchisee Is On The Brink Of Bankruptcy
      Pizza Hut’s Largest Franchisee Is On The Brink Of Bankruptcy

      NPC International, better known as Pizza Hut’s largest franchisee, is on the brink of bankruptcy.

      The company is reportedly exploring restructuring options for its more than 1,200 Pizza Hut locations and 400 Wendy’s locations. The franchise secured $35 million in loans earlier this year to help bolster its liquidity, but also recently defaulted on $800 million of its $1 billion in debt, according to Restaurant Dive.

      NPC reportedly skipped loan payments and entered into a forebearance agreement with lenders to allow time to weigh options for restructuring. The company is working with advisers at Greenhill & Co., AlixPartners LLP and Eldridge Industries LLC to weigh its restructuring options. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      A bankruptcy could help the company re-negotiate agreements with landlords and the company is reportedly still weighing options that will keep it out of court. 

      The company’s woes are partially attributable to lack of delivery, which is a consumer trend that other fast food companies have been able to embrace with services like Uber Eats and DoorDash. The company has also experienced headwinds from rising food and labor costs – and domestic same store sales that slipped 2% during Q4. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Chris Tuner, Yum Brands CFO, said last week: “There is potential for choppiness in near-term results of Pizza Hut U.S., primarily related to our largest franchisee.”

      The chain has tried to adapt to other ideas, like self-service pickup cubbies and in-store kiosks. Pizza Hut is considering rolling these ideas out to all stores, pending the results of a pilot test in two Texas restaurants. Meanwhile, Yum Brands has leveraged a delivery partnership with Grubhub to try and compete with other delivery names and competitors like Domino’s. 

      Pizza Hut announced last year it could temporarily close up to 500 underperforming restaurants for remodeling. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Recall, just weeks ago, we reported about the epidemic of small restaurants going bankrupt due to lack of traffic in areas where they are situated. 

      In that piece, that noted that names like Bar Louie and American Blue Ribbon Holdings, which owns Village Inn and Bakers Square, both filed for bankruptcy earlier this month and that both both cited lower foot traffic in the U.S. as the reason for their downfall. 

      Bar Louie’s Chief Restructuring Officer Howard Meitiner said at the time: “This inconsistent brand experience, coupled with increased competition and the general decline in customer traffic visiting traditional shopping locations and malls, resulted in less traffic at the company’s locations proximate to shopping locations and malls.”


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 20:35

    • The Atlantic: Trump Is Going To Cheat
      The Atlantic: Trump Is Going To Cheat

      Authored by Jeff Charles via LibertyNation.com,

      It isn’t even March yet, and progressives are already making their excuses for why they may lose to Trump in 2020. In a piece written for The Atlantic, Sarada Peri – a former senior speechwriter for President Barack Obama – launched the latest in a long line of arguments explaining why their loss would be unfair.

      The piece, titled “Trump Is Going to Cheat,” is the usual Democratic fare.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The author insists that the president is going to somehow use underhanded means to sway the election in his direction. Unfortunately for her, the argument doesn’t pass the smell test.

      President Trump Is Going To “Lie” To Win In 2020

      Peri begins by pointing out that the Democrats are currently in a heated contest to determine which one of them is the most electable. It doesn’t take long, however, for her to identify the real challenge any nominee will face: “He or she will need to run against a president seemingly prepared, and empowered, to lie and cheat his way to reelection.”

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The author claims that President Trump would seek another win by lying and saying “absolutely anything necessary to attract and maintain support.” She also points to the so-called list of Trump’s lies as president. If the newspaper responsible for this particular curation is to be believed, he has rattled off over 15,000 since taking office. Of course, even a cursory glance shows that most of the statements in the fib collection are either Trump’s opinions, hyperbole, or even simple mistakes.

      Moreover, the notion that the Democrats — and their close friends and allies in the press — are somehow the epitome of honesty is laughable given their constant caterwauling about Russiagate conspiracy theories. But, according to Peri, President Trump is going to do far worse when it comes to winning in November.

      Trump Is Going To “Cheat!”

      Just in case bending the truth a little doesn’t quite cut it, the president will find a way to cheat, somehow. Peri is sure of it. She recalls an observation made by journalist Katy Tur during a discussion about the challenges involved in covering the president:

      “She said that what made covering Trump as a reporter and running against him as a candidate so difficult was the way that scandals stuck—or didn’t stick—to him. Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of state was like a stain on her shirt that people couldn’t get past, because it was the only mark on an otherwise clean shirt. But Trump had so many stains that ‘you couldn’t tell if it was a stained shirt or if it was just supposed to be that way.’”

      The author goes on to cite the controversy over Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as an example of how he will break the rules to defeat his opponent. Of course, she forgets to mention that the Democrats failed to prove that Trump’s motivation in his dealings with Ukraine was specifically to hurt former Vice President Joe Biden.

      Peri also seems to forget the fact that Hillary Clinton’s campaign brazenly paid money to have a former British spy dig up dirt on Trump using Russian and Ukrainian sources. A little bit of “good for me, but not for thee,” perhaps? But that’s not the worst of it. It seems employing the Democrats’ tactic of using foreign powers to gain an edge in the election isn’t the only card up Trump’s sleeve.

      Trump Will Use Media To Cheat!

      In her effort to convince readers that Trump will use unfair means to keep his position in the Oval Office, Peri makes one of the most laughable arguments a progressive could suggest in this type of conversation: She blames the media. That’s right — she actually complains that right-wing media would support Trump and influence the masses:

      “Perhaps the most troubling form of cheating is the most diffuse, and therefore the hardest to grasp. Trump’s reelection campaign, abetted by right-wing media and companies like Facebook that have absolved themselves of any democratic responsibility, is waging a disinformation war modeled on the efforts of dictators and unprecedented in its scale. As reported by this magazine, the campaign is prepared to spend $1 billion to harness digital media to the president’s advantage, including bot attacks, viral conspiracy theories, doctored videos, and microtargeted ads that distort reality.”

      Trump Ain’t Leaving!

      Just when you think the author’s arguments couldn’t get any more ridiculous, she makes her final assertion: If Trump’s lying and cheating don’t secure his position, he will simply refuse to leave. Now, she is not the first to put forth such a silly idea, but, as proof, she cites the fact that he has made jokes about remaining in office past his term.

      “He retweeted Jerry Falwell Jr.’s suggestion that he ought to have two years added to his term and ‘joked’ about staying in office longer than eight years,” she wrote.

      “If he loses in November, the litigious showman might claim that the election was rigged against him and theatrically contest the results in court.”

      The Democrat Delusion

      According to Google, the definition of the word “delusional” is as follows:

      “Characterized by or holding idiosyncratic beliefs or impressions that are contradicted by reality or rational argument, typically as a symptom of mental disorder.”

      Peri’s piece is chock full of the delusional talking points the corporate press has bandied about since Trump took office. But it is far more than that. It is a stellar example of a tactic that is all too relevant nowadays: Always accuse your opponent of that which you are doing.

      Most of the accusations that one hears from Peri and her ilk have a ring of familiarity to them – but that’s because they describe the behavior and tactics the left tries to use against Trump…

      And as The Wall Street Journal’s Editorial Board notes,

      Democrats now know how millions of Republicans felt in 2016. A populist with devoted plurality support charges through the primary and caucus states, racking up delegates against multiple “establishment” candidates who all want to be the last alternative standing. Before the media knew it, Donald Trump could not be stopped.

      Democrats are waking to the prospect of a nominee who wants to eliminate private health insurance, raise taxes on the middle class, ban fracking and put government in charge of energy production, make college a taxpayer entitlement, offer free health care to illegal immigrants, raise spending by $50 trillion, and tag every down-ballot Democrat with the socialist label.


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 20:10

    •  "Big Hit" – Xi Warns Of Economic Fallout From Covid-19 Outbreak 
       “Big Hit” – Xi Warns Of Economic Fallout From Covid-19 Outbreak 

      China’s top leader, Xi Jinping, told officials at a Communist Party meeting on Sunday that the Covid-19 outbreak is a “big test” for the country, and policy adjustments would cushion the economy for a downturn. Xi acknowledged “obvious shortcomings in response to the epidemic,” warning that short-term financial stress could be imminent.

      We’ve noted on several occasions that China’s economy is completely paralyzed

      Just take a look at Goldman’s Adam Gillard’s recent commodity report that suggests full country apparent demand is down a massive -66% y/y.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Or better yet, Nomura’s Chief China economist Ting Lu noted that China’s Emerging Industries PMI (EPMI), which gauges momentum in the country’s high-tech industries and is closely correlated with official manufacturing PMI slumped to 29.9 in February (from 50.1 in January!). 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      So, it’s apparent that the closely followed China manufacturing PMI could print in 30-40 range this month, suggesting the current growth slump triggered by the virus is collapsing the Chinese economy. 

      Xi said Sunday the “the epidemic situation is still severe and complex, and prevention and control work is in the most difficult and critical stage.” 

      He warned: 

      “The outbreak of novel coronavirus pneumonia will inevitably have a relatively big impact on the economy and society.” 

      Beijing has deployed several rounds of monetary policy to support the economy, as a twin shock (demand and supply) is having devastating impacts on first-quarter growth. 

      Xi said low-risk provinces should restart production monetarily, areas with medium-level risks should restart production on an orderly timeline, and high-risk regions should focus on virus containment strategies. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      For more color on China’s plunging economic output, we noted last week several “alternative” economic indicators such as real-time measurements of air pollution (a proxy for industrial output), daily coal consumption (a proxy for electricity usage and manufacturing) and traffic congestion levels (a proxy for commerce and mobility), concluding that China’s economy appears to have ground to a halt.

      These observations were subsequently reaffirmed when we showed that steel demand, property sales, and passenger traffic had all failed to rebound from the “dead zone” hit during China’s Lunar New Year hibernation.

      No matter the policy support Beijing deploys to stabilize the economy, economic paralysis is already visible, with 750 million people in lockdown, where people are becoming irritable at Beijing’s now openly over propaganda to downplay the epidemic. The shuttering of factories will lead to countless workers being fired and companies running out of funds, as the next big bankruptcy wave will hit smaller to medium-sized operations. To make matters worse, the price of food is surging for the most volatile combination possible, a collapse of the economy mixed with social unrest, one which, if not arrested soon could lead a new violent phase in the virus outbreak. 

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Putting it all together, the most significant economic shock to hit China’s economy in nearly a decade is unfolding, and it could also tilt the global economy into recession

      For weeks, investors have been gobbling up stocks, convinced that more stimuli from Beijing could force a V-shaped rebound in China’s economy in Q2 – but as the pandemic spreads across the world, now shutting down parts of South KoreaJapan, Iran, and Italy, the whole containment narrative has broken down – and the global economy could be nearing a prolonged period of below-trend growth. 


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 19:45

    • "It Will Be Really, Really Bad": China Faces Financial Armageddon With 85% Of Businesses Set To Run Out Of Cash In 3 Months
      “It Will Be Really, Really Bad”: China Faces Financial Armageddon With 85% Of Businesses Set To Run Out Of Cash In 3 Months

      For the past two weeks, even as the market took delight in China’s doctored and fabricated numbers showing the coronavirus spread was “slowing”, we warned again and again that not only was this not the case (which recent data out of South Korea, Japan and now Italy has confirmed), but that for all its assertions to the contrary, China’s workers simply refused to go back to work (even with FoxConn offering its workers extra bonuses just to return to the factory) and as a result the domestic economy had ground to a halt as we described in:

      Unfortunately, it’s not getting any better as the latest high frequency updates out of China demonstrate:

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Also unfortunately, it is getting worse, because as we explained several weeks ago, China is now fighting against time to reboot its economy, and the longer the paralysis continues, the more dire the outcome for both China’s banks and local companies. And since it is no longer just “scaremongering” by “conspiracy blogs”, but rather conventional wisdom that China may implode, here is a summary of how the narrative that “it will all be over by mid-March” is dramatically changing.

      Let’s start with Chinese businesses: while China’s giant state-owned SOEs will likely have enough of a liquidity lifeblood to last them for 2-3 quarters, it is the country’s small businesses that are facing a head on collision with an iceberg, because according to the Nikkei, over 85% of small businesses – which employ 80% of China’s population – expect to run out of cash within three months, and a third expect the cash to be all gone within a month.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Should this happen, not only will China’s economy collapse, but China’s $40 trillion financial system will disintegrate, as it is suddenly flooded with trillions in bad loans.

      Take the case of Danny Lau who last week reopened his aluminum facade panel factory in China’s southern city of Dongguan after an extended Lunar New Year break. To his shock, less than a third of its roughly 200 migrant workers showed up.

      “They couldn’t make their way back,” the Hong Kong businessman said. Most of his workers hail from central-western China, including 11 from Hubei Province, the epicenter of the coronavirus outbreak that has killed more than 2,000 people. Many said they had been banned from leaving their villages as authorities race to contain the epidemic.

      Lau’s business had already been hurt by the 25% tariff on aluminum products the U.S. imposed in its tit-for-tat trade war with China. Now he worries the production constraints will give American customers another reason to cancel orders and switch to Southeast Asian suppliers. The virus is making a bad situation “worse,” he said.

      Lau is not alone: this same double blow is hitting small and midsize enterprises across China, prompting a growing chorus of calls for the government to step in and offer lifelines. The stakes could not be higher: These smaller employers account for 99.8% of registered companies in China and employ 79.4% of workers, according to the latest official statistics. They contribute more than 60% of gross domestic product and, for the government, more than 50% of tax revenue. In short: they are the beating heart of China’s economy.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Companies like Lau’s that have resumed some production are the lucky ones. Many factories and other businesses remain completely stalled due to the virus. Many owners have no other choice but pray that things return to normal before they careen off a financial cliff.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Chinese street vendor transacting at more than an arm’s length basis.

      And here is the stark reality of China’s T-minus 3 months countdown: 85% of 1,506 SMEs surveyed in early February said they expect to run out of cash within three months, according to a report by Tsinghua University and Peking University. And forget about profits for the foreseeable future: one-third of the respondents said the outbreak is likely to cut into their full-year revenue by more than 50%, according to the Nikkei.

      “Most SMEs in China rely on operating revenue and they have fewer sources for funding” than large companies and state-owned enterprises, said Zhu Wuxiang, a professor at Tsinghua University’s School of Economics and Management and a lead author of the report.

      The problem with sequential supply chains is that these also apply to the transfer of liquidity: employers need to pay landlords, workers, suppliers and creditors – regardless of whether they can regain full production capacity anytime soon. Any abrupt and lasting delays will wreak havoc on China’s economic ecosystem.

      “The longer the epidemic lasts, the larger the cash gap drain will be,” Zhu said, adding that companies affected by the trade war face a greater danger of bankruptcy because many are already heavily indebted.  “Self-rescue will not be enough. The government will need to lend help.”

      So where are we nearly two months after the epidemic started? Wwll, as of last Monday, only about 25% of people had returned to work in China’s tier-one cities, according to an estimate by Japanese brokerage Nomura, based on data from China’s Baidu. By the same time last year, 93% were back on the job.

      And making matters worse, as we first noted several weeks ago, local governments around the country face a daunting question of whether to focus on staving off the virus or encourage factory reopenings, as the following tweet perfectly captures.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      As long as the national logistics network “is still in shambles,” Nomura’s chief China economist, Lu Ting said, there might be little to gain from rushing restarts, whereas “the cost of a rebound in infections might be quite high.” He expects economic activity to pick up again in a couple of months, although the longer Beijing fails to confidently put an end to the pandemic, the longer it will take for activity to return to normal. Meanwhile the 3 month countdown clock is ticking…

      Don’t tell that to Zhou Dewen, the chairman of the Small and Medium Business Development Association in the city of Wenzhou, who knows this and agrees that this crisis is worse than SARS. Far, far worse. In fact, he said, it is “the most severe” of any crisis in the 40 years since China embarked on major economic reforms. He sees not a double but a “triple whammy,” factoring in the economic slowdown the country was experiencing even before the trade conflict and the virus.

      Wenzhou, on the coast of Zhejiang Province, was the first city outside Hubei put into full lockdown in an attempt to stop the pathogen. As of last week, Zhou said, only factories that produce medical supplies had been allowed to resume work.

      “What entrepreneurs need is confidence,” Zhou said. “But first they need to survive.” He is hoping the government will offer fiscal support and tax breaks to buy more time for small businesses. Some local governments have already responded to such pleas by waiving electric bills and delaying taxes, social security payments and loans. But for some businesses, such relief measures are little consolation.

      Worse, last Sunday the communist party’s mouthpiece, the Global Times, suggested that instead of waiting for fiscal bailouts, Beijing will have no choice but to cut spending and unleash austerity, a move that would have catastrophic consequences for China.  But even if Beijing does ease fiscally, it is unclear just what it can do short of printing money and handing it out to everyone. “A tax reduction doesn’t help if you don’t even have income,” said Zhu, who must somehow scrape together around 700,000 yuan ($100,000) for rent and the salaries of about 40 employees.

      Zhu reckons her company will lose about 3 million yuan in profit over the two months. Besides the postponements, couples that were looking at wedding options before the outbreak have put their planning on hold. There is little room, it seems, to think about love in the time of the coronavirus.

      “This is the most difficult time I have ever experienced” after 11 years of running the company, Zhu said. The worst part might be the uncertainty: She has no idea when the authorities might lift the ban or whether she can make it that long. “All of this is unknown to us,” Zhu said.

      She is not alone: Wu Hai, owner of Mei KTV, a chain of 100 Karaoke bars across China, took to the nation’s premier outlet of discontent, social media platform WeChat, to voice his despair. KTV’s bars have been closed by the government because of the virus, choking off its cash flow. The special loans from the authorities will be of little help and no bank will provide a loan without enough collateral and cash flow, he said on his official WeChat account earlier this month. On WeChat , Wu gave himself two months before he has to shutter his business.

      * * *

      It’s not just Japan’s flagship financial publication and owner of the Financial Times, the Nikkei, that is dramatically changing the narrative away from “all shall be well.” In its headline article today, Bloomberg writes that “Millions of Chinese Firms Face Collapse If Banks Don’t Act Fast” and described the plight of Brigita, a director at one of China’s largest car dealers, who is also running out of options. Her firm’s 100 outlets have been closed for about a month because of the coronavirus, cash reserves are dwindling and banks are reluctant to extend deadlines on billions of yuan in debt coming due over the next few months. There are also other creditors to think about.

      “If we can’t pay back the bonds, it will be very, very bad,” said Brigita, whose company has 10,000 employees and sells mid- to high-end car brands such as BMWs. She asked that only her first name be used and that her firm not be identified because she isn’t authorized to speak to the press. With much of China’s economy still idled as authorities try to contain an epidemic that has infected more than 75,000 people, millions of companies across the country are in a race against the clock to stay afloat.

      The irony, of course, is that all this is happening even as China has in fact eased dramatically in recent weeks, from cutting rates, to engaging in a barrage of mini stimulus measures, to injecting massive amounts of liquidity, to cutting taxes, to supporting virus-stricken companies…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      … to flooding the economy with a record 5 trilion in loans and shadow debt in the last month.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Yet while China’s government has cut interest rates, ordered banks to boost lending and loosened criteria for companies to restart operations, many of the nation’s private businesses say they’ve been unable to access the funding they need to meet upcoming deadlines for debt and salary payments. Without more financial support or a sudden rebound in China’s economy, some may have to shut for good.

      “If China fails to contain the virus in the first quarter, I expect a vast number of small businesses would go under,” said Lv Changshun, an analyst at Beijing Zhonghe Yingtai Management Consultant company.

      Said otherwise, unless China reboots its economy, it faces an economic shock the likes of which it has never seen before. Yet it can’t reboot the economy unless it truly stops the viral pandemic, something it will never be able to do if it lies to the population that the pandemic is almost over in hopes of forcing people to get back to work. Hence the most diabolic Catch 22 for China’s social and economic system, because whereas until now China could easily lie its way out of any problem, in this case lying will only make the underlying (viral pandemic) problem worse as sick people return to work, only to infect even more co-workers, forcing even more businesses to be quarantined.

      Some, like Bloomberg, blame the banks.

      As a group, Chinese banks had offered about 254 billion yuan in loans related to the containment effort as of Feb. 9, according to the banking industry association, with foreign lenders such as Citigroup Inc. also lowering rates. To put that into perspective, China’s small businesses typically face interest payments on about 36.9 trillion yuan of loans every quarter.

      In an emailed response to questions from Bloomberg News, ICBC said it has allocated 5.4 billion yuan ($770 million) to help companies fight the virus. “We approve qualified small businesses’ loan applications as soon as they arrive,” the bank said

      Alas, it is not that simple: as we explained two weeks ago in “China’s Banks Face $6 Trillion Coronavirus Cataclysm If Epidemic Is Not Contained Soon“, China’s banks are rapidly retrenching well-aware that they face an explosion in bad debt as the bulk of Chinese companies face collapse. As such, it makes little sense for them to throw good money after bad, and instead most are hunkering down in anticipation of the coming shock. 

      Indeed, as even Bloomberg concedes, banks are hardly any better off themselves: “Many are under-capitalized and on the ropes after two years of record debt defaults. Rating firm S&P Global has estimated that a prolonged emergency could cause the banking system’s bad loan ratio to more than triple to about 6.3%, amounting to an increase of 5.6 trillion yuan.”

      The bottom line is that for both companies and their bank lenders (and sources of potential rescue financing), there is one commodity in very short supply: trust. Trust that the counterparty will do the right thing; trust that the government will treat everyone fairly instead of just bailing out a handful of connected politicians. Trust, which in China in general has been lacking for years, as the formerly communist country succumbed to crony hypercapitalism with Chinese characteristics, one in which knowing who to bribe and who to lie to meant the difference between success and failure. Trust was never cultivated. And now that lack of trust is about to cost China dearly.

      In any case, the lack of far more funding means that China’s smaller businesses whose revenue have suddenly collapsed, have just weeks if not days of liquidity left. Brigita, whose firm owes money to dozens of banks, said she has so far only reached an agreement with a handful to extend payment deadlines by two months. For now, the company is still paying salaries. But those will stop too.

      And that’s when the real crisis begins as hundreds of millions of workers suddenly find themselves unemployed.

      For some the crisis has already begun. Wang Qiang, a 23-year-old migrant worker, has been unable to find work in Shenzhen after three weeks of searching. On top of the limited factory job openings, the Nikkei notes that he faces another major obstacle: his identification labels him a native of Hubei.

      His home province, where the virus originated, accounts for the vast majority of the 74,000-plus mainland infections and most of the deaths. “The labor dispatch companies told me that the factories don’t want people from Hubei,” he said. The fact that he did not go home for the Lunar New Year holidays seems to make no difference.

      Wang spends his nights sleeping on the floor of an uncompleted building. “I’ll wait and see if the situation gets better when companies restart work on Feb. 24.”

      In a few short hours Wang will be greatly disappointed. He won’t be the last one, however, and if China’s doesn’t find some miraculous solution to the current coronavirus crisis, in two months China will face a financial, economic and social cataclysm the likes of which it has never seen in its modern history.


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 19:44

    • World's Biggest Oil Hedge Fund Plunges 8% In January Following Two Years Of Losses
      World’s Biggest Oil Hedge Fund Plunges 8% In January Following Two Years Of Losses

      Back in 2008 Forbes Magazine placed Pierre Andurand in its list of the top 20 highest-earning hedge-fund managers. That was the year after the French commodity trader co-founded the hedge-fund BlueGold with $300 million AUM. In June of 2008, just before oil crashed, BlueGold’s returns were described by the New York Post as “eye-popping” and “monstrous”. although it was a very different story just a few months later when oil plunged from $145 to $40. In any case, riding the dramatic recovery in the price of oil from 2009 to 2011 helped BlueGold cement its position as one of the largest oil-focused hedge funds, with AUM hitting $2.4 billion after returning 210% in 2008, 55% in 2009, 13% in 2010, and -34% in 2011.

      Then, after BlueGold shuttered in April 2012, Andurand launched a new hedge fund: Andurand Capital, which once again invested mostly in oil but also has a secondary focus on other commodities such as metals and as of May 2018, the firm managed $1.2bn in assets.

      And while Andurand timed the 2014 oil crash perfectly, returning 38% the year when the near OPEC-breakup sent oil plunging from above $100 to $30, it has been a challenging time for the commodity investor who turned bullish on oil in 2016, only to suffer a very choppy oil market for the past several years. So choppy, in fact, that after two years of losses, Andurand suffered another dramatic loss in January, when oil prices once again tumbled, this time on fears the coronavirus was hurting global economic growth, which in turn hit demand for oil and roiled global commodity markets.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The furious January drop was so unexpected that the Andurand Commodities Fund, dubbed by Bloomberg as “one of the oil market’s last remaining hedge funds”, plunged 8.4% last month, according to Bloomberg. The loss was the fund’s biggest monthly decline since October 2018 when it plunged 21% as global stocks swooned amid fears the Fed was hiking rates into a recession. Last month’s loss followed two prior painful years for Andurand who was down 7.1% in 2019 and 20% a year earlier.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      So is another name for “brilliant hedge fund investor” just “that guy who uses a ton of leverage to boost his beta” and picked the right side of the coin toss? What about picking the wrong side for three years in a row? If so, one wonders if an even better description for someone like Andurand is just “lucky”, something has has not been for the past three years when he desperately hoped that oil prices would skyrocket higher even as China’s economic slowdown meant that oil demand would suffer so much even OPEC now agrees.

      As Bloomberg notes, oil had its worst start to a year since 1991 on concern the spread of the coronavirus will curb demand in China for energy. Brent fell 16% in January as China, the world’s largest oil importer, locked down its cities in a bid to prevent the spread of the virus.

      According to various sources from Goldman to commodities trading giant Vitol, the market is facing a 200 million-barrel demand loss in the first quarter, culminating in a 4 million-barrels-a-day decrease in China currently as the virus hits economic activity and restricts travel.


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 18:55

    • Syria Stands As A Mega-Embarrassment For America
      Syria Stands As A Mega-Embarrassment For America

      Authored by Bruce Wilds via Advancing Time blog,

      For a long time, America has tried to ignore and distance itself from its role in making Syria the disaster it is today. Syria stands as a mega-embarrassment that shines a spotlight on America’s failed foreign policy. To say President Obama blew it is an understatement. His inexperience took us down a rabbit hole with each turn revealing more ugliness than the one before. Both Obama and Trump pledged to reduce America’s role in Afghanistan and Iraq but it has proven easier said than done, it has also had massive far-reaching ramifications.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Aleppo Is Just One Of The Many Cities Destroyed

      By reassuring and almost encouraging the people of Syria to rise up and overthrow their brutal leader Obama started a series of events that has taken countless lives and destroyed millions of others. Three of the most damaging developments flowing from this are the development of ISIS, the flow of millions of refugees into Europe, and the bombing and destruction of cities and innocent civilians.

       Continued violence in the region over the last decade has spurred the destabilizing mass migration of millions of people from the area.

      Many people do not realize the formation of ISIS is rooted in this mess and flowed out of America’s meddling. A failed attempt to build an army to fight Syrian President Bashar al-Assad backfired.  A report published by Reuters claimed that 200 men were trained and that over 1200 were to be added in a plan to prepare to free Syria from the rule of President Bashar but General Ibrahim al-Douri. who had been on the US most-wanted list since the second Gulf War took over control. This left the group with a problematic leader and a huge war chest at his disposal. Most of the money had come from US allies, including Kuwait, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, all are Sunni-based countries that originally supported ISIS.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      The Middle East Is Ready To Kill

      For years, day after day, week after week, month after month, the American people have busied themselves with ignoring the Pandora’s box of misery Obama opened and unleashed is his arrogance. Please don’t take this as an Obama bashing, he didn’t do it alone. The same old group of clowns that have infected American foreign policy for years weighed in and helped bring us to where we are today. America simply can’t mind its own business.

      While it could be argued a great deal of this is a continuation of President Bush’s folly, anyone making such a case should concede that Obama widened the conflict destabilizing the situation even more. In 2011, he and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton decided to undertake a “military intervention ” in Libya. Years later in a 2016 Fox interview, Obama said the handling of the military intervention in Libya was his “worst mistake” Today, oil-rich Libya is a violent mess split between rival governments, each backed by an array of foreign countries jockeying for influence and control of Libya’s resources. According to a statement from the UN, the failed country is continuing its long efforts to reach a lasting cease-fire. 

      Looking back at President Obama’s legacy in early 2017, The Guardian reported that in 2016 alone, the Obama administration dropped at least 26,171 bombs. Most of these air attacks were in Syria and Iraq but US bombs were also dropped in Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, and Pakistan. All seven of these countries have populations where a majority of the people are Muslim. as for the numbers of civilians killed by these bombs it could be in the thousands. We will never know because both the administration and mainstream media remained nearly silent about the civilian toll of the administration’s failed interventions.

      Returning to the issue of Syria, currently, around a million Syrians have their backs against the wall in the northern Syrian province of Idlib. The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs reports the number of civilians displaced since December 1 at 700,000. These civilians are trapped, the population is caught under the bombs of a three-way war which now involves the Syrian-Russian alliance fighting Turkey, as well as Turkish proxy jihadists as well as terror group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.

      The Syrian and Russian armies are bombing these people while Turkey refuses to let them cross the border partly because once there they become Turkey’s problem. Adding to the problem is that the European Union has signaled they don’t want them either. The situation has degraded into an almost bizarre state where America and the Trump administration are backing Turkey and its President Tayyip Erdoğan. This is definitely not a marriage made in heaven. Over the last few years, Turkey has bashed the Kurds and played Russia against America while constantly leaning on Greece and the Euro-zone.

      People Have Fled To Horrible Camps

      Those that have fled the fighting are suffering horrible conditions. A YouTube video is linked to the picture to the right. Clicking on the picture brings up drone footage showing the horrible conditions in a refugee camp covered in snow. Snow blankets the countryside while mothers and their children live in flimsy tents without heat or enough to eat.

      Living in the mud, cold and hungry without proper sanitation is far from ideal. The children have no real schools and people have little to do except to suffer. To make matters worse the men have little or no work or any way to make money. Life in the refugee camps is a case of just trying to survive until things get better. It is important to remember most of these were happy middle-class people simply wanting to go about their lives before we stirred the pot.

      I started writing about Syria back in 2012. At the time I predicted the country had passed the tipping point and was facing a civil war. That was at a time forces were lining up to supply weapons to both sides of the Syrian conflict. This fueled the fire and turned the Syrian people into pawns in a very dangerous and deadly game. As in Libya, a parade of foreign countries jockeying for influence and control have poured weapons and fighters into the area and it is the people of the region that are paying the price.

      Was their government perfect? No, but they were not living under the conditions under which they are currently forced to exist. To make matters worse the vice is expected to tighten. Syria is only one example of how meddling in the affairs of other countries has consequences. Unfortunately, America’s history of intruding in the affairs of others has been widespread. To say these people face a bleak future is most likely an understatement because the world is doing little to help them. It could be said that with friends like us these counties don’t need more enemies.


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 18:30

    • Futures Plunge, Gold Soars As Covid-19 Contagion Craters Complacency
      Futures Plunge, Gold Soars As Covid-19 Contagion Craters Complacency

      After a weekend in which attention is now firmly focused on the accelerating spread of the coronavirus outside of China (whose epidemic numbers have become a bigger joke than the country’s GDP), with Italy now a supercluster of new cases that has sealed off Northern Italy and threatens to shut down Schengen…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      …traders are back to their desks and for once, it appears they are realizing that central bankers can’t print their way out of this particular pandemic mess.

      US equity futures are accelerating their catch down to reality…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Dow Futures are down 400 points…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Spot gold is up over 2%, breaking $1680…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      WTI Crude is also plunging, back to a $51 handle…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      And after JPY’s recent collapse, Nikkei futures are down 500 points in early trading…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      And therefore, as always, The BoJ is out with its standard boiler-plate  – we’ll puke more money and buy more of everything – plan…

      The Bank of Japan will be fully prepared to take necessary action to mitigate the impact of the coronavirus on the world’s third-largest economy, its Governor Haruhiko Kuroda said. Kuroda said there was no major change to the BOJ’s projection that Japan’s economy would keep recovering moderately thanks to an expected rebound in global growth around mid-year.

      He also repeated the view that, while the central bank stands ready to ease monetary policy further “without hesitation”, it saw no immediate need to act.

      But Kuroda said the BOJ would scrutinize developments on the virus outbreak carefully, since the damage to Japan’s economy could be profound if the epidemic is prolonged and disrupts supply chains.

      First of all, just how is printing money going to fix the virus; and second, what is this “moderate recovery” he is talking about after the -1.6% GDP print?!

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Finally, we do note that Japan is closed for the Emperor’s Birthday celebration so markets are especially illiquid… and cash bond trading remains closed. However, 10Y bond futures are surging, implying a  1.41% yield…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Nevertheless, it appears, as we noted above, investors are starting to wake up to the fact that central bankers can’t print vaccines… and you can only swallow so many blue pills before the red one becomes too tempting.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Time for a phone call…

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 18:28

    • China's 'Fake' Coronavirus Numbers Exposed: Doctor In Hunan Confirms 50 New Cases, Only One Reported
      China’s ‘Fake’ Coronavirus Numbers Exposed: Doctor In Hunan Confirms 50 New Cases, Only One Reported

      In one of many shocking videos circulating on Twitter, a recent clip of a doctor in Hunan that was widely shared by credible journalists covering the outbreak has caught our attention because it supports our theory – which has become increasingly widely adopted among the western press – that Chinese health officials are seriously undercounting the number of cases and deaths.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      As the Washington Post wrote in a piece published earlier this week: “Chinese leaders and state media strike a coordinated note this week about the government’s ability to contain the outbreak, inconsistencies and sudden changes in official data are leaving experts — and journalists — struggling to plot meaningful trends, or even place any confidence in the figures coming from government.”

      The WaPo reporters pointed to a clear case of manipulation where the authorities suppressed the true number of cases.

      Authorities in Hubei province reported good news Thursday: There were only 349 new coronavirus cases the previous day, the lowest tally in weeks.

      The bad – and puzzling – news? Wuhan, the capital of Hubei, reported 615 new cases all by itself.

      Hubei authorities have changed their criteria for counting cases three times over the past week or so.

      Hubei officials explained that they deducted cases that have not been confirmed through genetic tests from their total reported number of cases. Since this mistake was very, very public, we also reported on it.

      But we’ve been reporting on this for weeks. The mainstream press in the US has since caught on, as the WaPo post shows. As its reporters claim, though there is no obvious smoking gun, most experts still believe China is underreporting cases based on mathematical algorithms and other methods used to project the rate of infection.

      There is no smoking gun suggesting that Chinese officials fabricate numbers – at least not since late January. But many researchers say the official figures probably underestimate the true numbers because of limited testing capacity and the prevalence of cases with mild or no symptoms. That is why having case numbers collected with consistent methodology would help scholars chart the general contours, if not the precise values, of how the epidemic is unfolding.

      We could go back all the way to the first “shift” in China’s reporting methodology on Feb. 12, when officials reported the first major spike in cases, shaking market confidence in the process, until Beijing axed two senior local officials in one of many obvious scapegoatings by Beijing.

      China’s numbers have consistently kept the fatality rate from the virus at around 2%. But given the exponential rate of spread outside China, and evidence that it acted too late with its quarantine’s to really blunt the outbreak, some suspect that this number, too, will rise once researchers get a fuller picture of what’s happening on the ground.


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 18:05

    • Obama DHS Whistleblower Found Dead On Side Of California Highway, Police Rule Suicide
      Obama DHS Whistleblower Found Dead On Side Of California Highway, Police Rule Suicide

      Department of Homeland Security (DHS) whistleblower Philip Haney was found dead on the side of a desolate California highway on Friday with a single gunshot would to the head, according to local authorities.

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      Haney’s death has been ruled a suicide by an Amador County coroner, who noted that a firearm was observed next to the 66-year-old, who was found lying next to his vehicle.

      “Upon their arrival, they located and identified 66-year-old Philip Haney, who was deceased and appeared to have suffered a single, self-inflicted gunshot wound. A firearm was located next to Haney and his vehicle. This investigation is active and ongoing. No further details will be released at this time,” reads the report.

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

      So, Haney supposedly parked his car on the side of the road and shot himself in the head just after 10 a.m. on Friday. And while his death is clearly suspicious to some, it should be noted that his wife, Francesca, passed away eight months ago in June 2019 following a battle with cancer. The couple had one daughter named Sara, an ordained minister who previously served as the chaplain for the Cobb Detention Center according to Francesca’s Facebook page (via Heavy).

      Haney lived in Plymouth, California – approximately 40 miles east of Sacramento.

      He notably authored “See Something, Say Nothing: A Homeland Security Officer Exposes the Government’s Submission to Jihad,” a scathing criticism of the Obama administration’s handling of radical Islamic terrorism. In 2016, he testified that the Obama administration could have prevented the Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando, Florida if they had not acted in favor of “political correctness.”

      Haney, who retired in 2015, studied Arabic culture and language while working as a scientist in the Middle East before becoming a founding member of the Department of Homeland Security in 2002 as a Customs & Border Protection (CBP) agriculture officer.

      After serving as an armed CBP officer, he was promoted to its Advanced Targeting Team. He specialized in Islamic theology and the strategy and tactics of the global Islamic movement. –Fox News

      Haney, a founding member of DHS, described his work at the agency like dealing with bugs – saying he “followed the trail and found the nest.”

      News of Haney’s death rocked those who knew him.

      “Somebody I deeply respected and considered a friend Phil Haney – a DHS whistleblower during the Obama Admin was apparently killed yesterday in Southern California,” wrote journalist Sara Carter in a Saturday tweet. “Pray for his family and pray they find the person who murdered him. Still trying to get confirmation on details.”

      https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 17:44

    • The Bogus Big Brother-Big Tech Brawl Over Backdoors
      The Bogus Big Brother-Big Tech Brawl Over Backdoors

      Authored by Bill Blunden via TheAmericanConservative.com,

      The law can already get into your phone anytime. But Apple needs you to think it isn’t helping them…

      <!–[if IE 9]><![endif]–>

      In the wake of this year’s Munich Security Conference, members of the European Union are pushing back against warnings by the United States about networking gear sold by Chinese telecom giant Huawei. American officials have alleged that Huawei can covertly access its equipment through backdoors designed for law enforcement, and voiced concerns about the risk associated with installing hardware that could give the Chinese government the ability to remotely monitor or even disable other nation’s networks.    

      The insistence of countries like Britain and Germany on integrating technology from a police state directly into their digital infrastructure is definitely curious. But it’s not like supply chain subversion hasn’t already transpired on an industrial scale. For example, we know now, thanks to a recent Washington Post report, that during the early days of the Cold War, the Central Intelligence Agency succeeded in secretly compromising encryption technology used by over 120 different countries. For years, American spies were tapping lines and pilfering secrets from all over the globe.  

      Back to 2020. American officials are sounding alarms about Huawei having backdoors, though that hasn’t stopped them from supporting U.S. law enforcement getting their own access to everyone’s data whenever they want. But theirs is a “noble” cause: high ranking members of the political establishment are warning that they won’t be able to protect us against terrorists, drug cartels, and child pornographers unless Silicon Valley allows in American security services. 

      The tech industry has responded by assuming a defiant stance that seems to side with user privacy. Yet history informs us that this Manichean soap opera is not always what it appears to be. Concealed behind the headlines is a choreographed routine in which executives and politicians confront each other across the table while secretly shaking hands underneath.    

      The “Going Dark” Narrative 

      At the core of the matter is encryption technology. This past summer, Attorney General William Barr complained that encryption “allows criminals to operate with impunity, hiding their activities under an impenetrable cloak of secrecy.” Such that the government’s ability to discern illegal conduct online is “going dark.” The Five Eyes intelligence alliance (consisting of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand) publicly proposed weakening cryptographic protocols so they could engage in “lawful interception” of digital communications.

      Upping the ante, in December, Senator Lindsey Graham issued an ultimatum to business leaders at a Judiciary Committee hearing. He asserted that “this time next year, if you haven’t found a way that you can live with it, we will impose our will on you.” Graham has begun drafting a bill to this end.  

      It goes without saying that the tech industry opposes this strategy of government-imposed backdoors. That’s mainly because security boosts brand, and that in turn boosts sales. Not to mention that standing up to the big bad government provides street cred and scads of free publicity. When Barr presented his case for mandated backdoors, Facebook replied that his scheme “would be a gift to criminals, hackers and repressive regimes.” Apple likewise protested that “Backdoors can also be exploited by those who threaten our national security and the data security of our customers…encryption is vital to protecting our country and our users’ data.”

      Of course, there’s something missing from this debate. Something that merits careful attention.  

      Strong Crypto as a Speed Bump  

      It just so happens that strong encryption isn’t the cure-all that it’s cracked up to be. This is an inconvenient truth that’s confirmed on a daily basis. For example, in mid-October of 2019, the Department of Justice announced the takedown of a massive online repository of child pornography. The portal resided on the dark net, leveraging both the Tor anonymity suite as well as Bitcoin to conceal the identities of its user base. Yet in spite of these countermeasures, federal agents unearthed terabytes of evidence. The ensuing crackdown led to charges against more than 300 people. 

      And this isn’t the first time the feds succeeded in collectively unmasking large swathes of presumably nameless users. In 2015, the Federal Bureau of Investigation launched Operation Pacifier, which used a “court-approved network investigative technique” (e.g. hacking) to track down and arrest over 350 members of yet another website that was hosting child pornography.  

      Suddenly the dark net doesn’t seem so dark. 

      The public record indicates that there’s a whole industry devoted to sidestepping device encryption, catering primarily to the intelligence community. Companies like Israel’s NSO Group have garnered substantial media attention. The NSO Group has openly boasted that “it developed a hacking tool that can break into just about any smartphone on Earth.” 

      Please rewind and ponder the implications of that previous sentence. Then perhaps reassess the risk associated with allegedly secure messaging software like WhatsApp or seemingly impregnable devices like the iPhone. Glenn Greenwald himself may be having second thoughts after Brazilian security services intercepted messages he exchanged with hackers.  

      There are countless vendors in this space, companies like Hacking Team and Gamma International whose surveillance tools have garnered media attention. Wade around in this shadowy milieu long enough and the underlying subtext becomes clear: encrypt confidential data all you want; it doesn’t matter if someone can hack your computer and make off with the data inside.   

      Backdoors and Backroom Deals 

      These spyware companies thrive because the backdoors that everyone is arguing about are already out there, wide open in the field. They exist in the form of plausibly deniable technical flaws, aka bugs. These bugs are legion because market incentives favor low costs over security. And also because industry titans like RSA have been known to secretly cooperate with spy chiefs while vocally rebuffing their agendas in the press. 

      During the crypto wars of the 1990s, the president of RSA proudly announced that “for almost 10 years, I’ve been going toe to toe with these people at Fort Meade. The success of this company is the worst thing that can happen to them. To them, we’re the real enemy, we’re the real target.” Pay no heed to the backdoor that they planted for the NSA.   

      Sound familiar? That’s the kayfabe in action. Feud in public and fraternize in private. Coquettishly wink at spies while making noise for rubes. 

      Apple has likewise shown a propensity for quiet cooperation. A couple of years ago, they decided against encrypted iCloud backups after the FBI balked. And when the FBI initially requested help accessing the iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters, Apple was perfectly happy to help them so long as the FBI quietly submitted the request under seal. Only after the request went public did Tim Cook adopt a more antagonistic posture. For users in Russia, Apple discreetly adjusted its maps and weather apps so that Crimea appears to be a part of Russian territory.  

      Pity the Overworked Bureaucrat

      This obviously raises a question. With the abundant supply of commercial tools and the ongoing success against dark nets, why are officials so keen to paint their investigative programs as “going dark”? 

      One answer pivots on the nature of bureaucracies, a world where budgets are fixed and overworked apparatchiks are under pressure from above to get results with limited resources. In a nutshell, state-sanctioned backdoors are convenient. They don’t require the resources necessary to launch and maintain an extended hacking campaign. Clandestine cyber ops can involve multiple teams of technical specialists working around the clock in conjunction with field officers and support staff. Faced with a towering case load and impatient bosses, the typical civil servant will understandably opt for whatever solution makes their job easier. 

      To use an analogy, why spend hours to break into a bank vault, lugging around heavy equipment and making a huge mess, when you can nonchalantly walk up and swing it open with the factory-enabled bypass combination? 

      Legally mandated cryptographic backdoors are the path of least resistance, a surveillance geodesic compliments of the justice system. While you can’t necessarily fault government officials for wanting to take the easy route, it’s important to recognize when they’re wielding imperfect metaphors to justify their demands. Thanks to clandestine arrangements, perpetually buggy code, and cheap gear, American security services aren’t going dark anytime soon. 


      Tyler Durden

      Sun, 02/23/2020 – 17:40

    Digest powered by RSS Digest