Covid – The Truth

The so-called “Covid pandemic” was planned, years in advance of 2020. The name may have been different, and the actual launch date uncertain, but the implementation and format was totally planned.

Obvious question is why? The answer is not so obvious, and several possibilities present themselves.

1. To vaccinate the entire population, as suggested by Bill Gates in a 2104 TED talk, but to what end?
   1. To kill and main a proportion of the population
   2. To create some kind of chemical dependency
   3. To create an endless revenue stream for the Big Pharma companies
   4.  To compromise the innate immune system, to make the vaccinated more susceptible to disease, leading to a future dependency on pharmaceutical drugs
   5. To introduce some foreign agent, as yet undisclosed – graphene, nano-lipids, nanoparticles
2. To introduce a vaccine passport system, whereby people can be punished, excluded or fined for failure to keep up to date with their “required” boosters and vaccinations
3. To introduce a China style social credit system, whereby peoples movements, and other aspects of their lives can be controlled, a natural extension to item 2.
4. Use the fear generated to control the populations, allowing the implementation of Agenda 2030, Zero carbon goals, the WEF Great Reset and Build Back Better initiatives, 15 minute cities.
5. Introduce CBDC’s and usher in the cashless society, tied in neatly to items 2, 3 and 4.
6. Leading to “You’ll own nothing, and you’ll be happy” and you will do exactly what you are told, when you are told without question. Failure to comply will mean total exclusion from society or movement to a death camp (potentially).
7. Alternatively, this could be just part of the wider Climate Emergency agenda, to allow lockdowns and other measures to be introduced to combat Climate Change – which always means Manmade Climate Change.

Our lack of resistance and demands for freedom and rights has been very telling, it has not gone unnoticed by those who believe themselves to be in charge. We have sort of proven them right, they are in charge, and they can get away with pretty much any abuse of power, in the name of an emergency.

A suitable Coronavirus strain was obtained from Bats in the wild. Suitable for modification and manipulation.

This Bat virus was genetically modified intentionally to make humans susceptible to it, through Gain of Function (GoF). This was performed at various Bio Labs around the World, including one in Wuhan, China. GoF was also used to make the Bat virus highly transmissible.

The GM Bat virus, which came to be known as SARS-COV-2 (Covid-19) was intentionally released into the population in Wuhan, China and elsewhere.

Crisis actors in Wuhan, China (and elsewhere) appeared to collapse and instantly die in the street. Others were shown in scary Hazmat suits, and spraying “disinfectant” in “affected areas, all to dramatic effect. Entire hospitals were built in mere weeks, because! We know they were crisis actors in China, because the collapsing and dying has not been observed in day to day life, except professional athletes on football pitches and other sports venues.

The GM Bat virus was created to produce a potentially dangerous spike protein in humans.

This spike protein was used to synthesise several so-called vaccines (prior to virus release), which in most cases were experimental gene therapy treatments, using mRNA or modified DNA strands.

In parallel to the “vaccine” development, two testing protocols were developed to “detect” SARS-VOV-2, the PCR test and the LFT test. The PCR test was deemed the more “accurate” test for the virus, but only when cranked up to 40 or more test cycles, even though after around 18 cycles the test increasingly reports false positives.

Somewhat fortuitously (for our so-called leaders), the inventor of the PCR test Kary Mullis who was highly outspoken about its use and suitability outside of research and definitely NOT as a diagnostic test, had died in summer 2019.

Starting on 18th October 2019, a simulation called Event-201 was run, by the John Hopkins University, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and others, of a global pandemic based on a Bat Coronavirus. Many of the conclusions arising from the simulation were a blueprint for exactly what happened when the WHO declared a Viral Pandemic in March 2020, except the “real” virus was much less deadly than the simulated one – thankfully.

Politicians and media across the planet were instructed to drive a fear narrative, to convince the global public that a deadly virus was spreading across the world, and that anyone that caught this virus would probably die. We were told we were facing a disease posing an existential threat to humanity and that if the governments of the world did not act quickly and decisively mankind potentially faced extinction.

This fear generation has worked much better than they could have possibly imagined, the level of supplication and compliance has been truly staggering. Some people have been even begging for even more severe restrictions, faster, harder and longer.

Some would like to see masks as mandatory, in all settings, forever, or for people to be forcibly restrained in their homes if they so much as cough or sneeze. Those people can choose to live their own lives like that if they wish, and die early in misery, but they have no right to even suggest that of others.

Covid-19 became the only news item for months, nothing else mattered, except the unstoppable spread of the deadly virus.

It turns out though that a lot of the harrowing images of ICU’s full of dangerously ill and dying victims may not have been true, as the same video’s and pictures are shown as being from different hospitals all over the world – exact same images and footage.

On the 19th March 2020, the four nations of the UK downgraded the severity of Covid-19 from the highest category of High Consequence Infections Disease (HCID) status, this move was not made public and totally ignored by the media.

Four days later, on 23rd march 2020, in a very sombre tone, not unlike a declaration that the country was now at war, UK prime minister Boris Johnson announced to the nation that we would need to take unprecedented  steps to halt the spread of the deadly virus.

The UK would for the first time in history enter an enforced lockdown, people would not be allowed to leave their homes more than once a day, and all non-essential businesses would be forced to close. People would be prohibited from meeting with other people not of their household, for any reason.

However, this extreme and draconian response would only be for 3 weeks, to reduce the strain on the beleaguered NHS (busy dancing on Tik Tok video’s) and to “flatten the curve” – we were told.

We were also asked, like Pavlov’s Dogs, every Thursday evening to leave our homes (permission granted) to clap the NHS hero’s, and if we wished we could bang pots and pans, because that was what the NHS staff needed, not more pay or additional staff or protective gear, and we had to show some appreciation for their dancing prowess. It must be really hard to find the time to film a dance sequence when you are overwhelmed by a pandemic.

The government and parliament passed the Coronavirus Act 2020 (probably drafted years in advance) to introduce a whole raft of draconian “laws” and mandates, never used before in any country or democracy.

The UK government turned to its highly trusted and reliable (useless and unreliable) epidemic modellers at Imperial College London, led by the trusted (constantly wrong and exaggerating) Professor Neil Ferguson – who in reality had a terrible track record for highly inaccurate and overestimated predictions, he was not just wrong, he was spectacularly wrong on several occasions. However, despite his apparent shortcomings, Ferguson was the go to guy for apocalyptic predictions, and the models he and his team produced would serve to guide government policy for over two years. These policies were also adopted in many other Countries, based on Imperial College modelling.

Covid-19, as a disease was unique in many ways, but being deadly to everyone was not one of them, 95% of those who catch it exhibit little or no symptoms; the global CFR (Case Fatality Rate) is between 0.1 and 0.5%; over 80% of those who die are over 60, and 95% of those who die have existing known severe chronic or acute conditions. Covid is dangerous to people over 60 who have existing severe conditions or are frail, those of any age with serious health issues or are immune compromised. Sadly, people die, and every year people die from respiratory diseases, even the Common Cold, which is a Coronavirus.

In the UK the average age of Covid death is around 82, which is higher than the average age of death for any reason. It elicited many responses which had never been used or seen before, some of which to some people seemed strange, illogical and arbitrary.

Many people who oppose the various draconian measures introduced concede that the first lockdown may have been justified, as we just didn’t know what we were dealing with at the time! That assertion is totally wrong for several reasons.

Firstly, lockdowns had never been used on entire populations before, apart from some spurious and suspect modelling, no-one knew how effective, or ineffective it would be. They did however know how economically and psychologically devastating they would be.

Secondly, the UK and other countries had well known and effective pandemic strategies, these for no good reason were simply abandoned for unknown and untested interventions.

Thirdly, before Covid reached UK, we had seen that in Italy it was the old and infirm that were dying, this may have required we do something to protect the elderly and those in care homes specifically (Great Barrington Declaration), but provided no justification for locking everyone in their homes.

New words appeared, and other words had their meanings changed, perhaps the words contracted Covid, just another of the seeming thousands of possible symptoms.

The word pandemic was changed, so the Covid outbreak could be declared a pandemic.

Vaccine and vaccination where changed so that an experimental, never before used and inadequately tested novel gene therapy could be administered as if it were a bona fide vaccine in the usual sense. In addition, vaccination came to mean you were only classified as vaccinated 14 days after you were vaccinated, so if you died within those 14 days you were classified as unvaccinated, and any adverse effect or death within those 14 days were not vaccine related. Confused? This is just typical of Covid mania, and yet the majority just meekly accepted it.

Another word that changed, was the word “Case” when used to define someone as infected by a particular pathogen. In the old world (pre-2020) a case of an illness would be following a diagnosis by a doctor, maybe following and affirming a test for that illness. In Covid Land, a case became conflated with a positive outcome following a PCR test, but with no doctors diagnosis. This is the same PCR test that its inventor (for which he won a Nobel prize in medicine) categorically stated was not suitable as a diagnosis test, but very useful in research. So if you had a PCR test (and many millions did) because you maybe had a runny nose or a cough (formerly a cold), and that PCR test came back positive, regardless of how many cycles it may have been subjected to (unreliable beyond about 25) you had Covid, and you were a Case, a statistic in the daily regurgitation of all things Covid statistics. For the Health Nazi’s a case was a good thing, especially if hospitalisations and deaths were low or non-existent, and if you died within 28 days of a positive PCR test then you died of Covid, even if you were shot, stabbed, run over or fell off a tall building – cause of death was Covid. Oddly, that had never, ever in history been the case. Normally if you died from say gunshot wounds, or being decapitated in a car crash, that was your actual cause of death! But not any more, not now Covid is in town. The public were also eventually offered the opportunity to declare themselves as a Covid case, all they needed to do was order some free LFT tests, and if they were lucky enough to get a positive reading (of who knows what) they could be rewarded by contacting the NHS and telling them what a good case they were. As an added bonus, at one point that meant you were prohibited from leaving your home or having contact with anyone outside your home for 10 whole days! Even then you needed a negative LFT test to be allowed out again.

Another word that had its meaning changed was approved, as in the Covid vaccines were approved! They were never approved, they were granted Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) because until the end of January 2023 they were still officially under Stage 3 clinical trials. If effective treatments, prophylactics or therapeutics are available then EUA cannot be granted, so the health regulatory bodies had to discredit highly effective, safe and well known drugs such as HCQ, CHQ and Ivermectin, as well as immune boosting vitamins (C and D) and other supplements, which could have saved many lives.

Other words became conflated, dying “from/of” Covid (4.5%) became synonymous “with” dying with Covid (95.5%). Some of the new words included bubbles, cohorts, furlough, Midazolam, lockdown, Remdesivir, social distancing, tiers, shielding, quarantine and Covid-Secure.

In the first declared wave of Covid (March to May 2020) miraculously people suddenly stopped dying of Heart disease and Cancer, which had up until then been the top 2 killer diseases in the UK. Unfortunately and tragically for those who would have died of heart disease and cancer, they instead died of Covid, the grim reaper still got them.

In an even more bizarre twist, during the 3rd wave in 2021, all those who previously would have died from flu (influenza/pneumonia) died from Covid, and for an entire year flu was almost totally eradicated in the UK, amazing! Sadly though, by 2021 people had gone back to dying of Heart disease and cancer, as well as “suddenly” also known as SADS (Sudden Adult Death Syndrome), aka vaccine death.

As the first wave of (assumed) Covid fizzled out to a handful of deaths, or even cases a day, the government in its infinite wisdom on July 26th (mid summer) decided we all needed to start wearing masks in indoor setting, which for some very smart people meant when alone in their car, or swimming in the sea alone. This was following advice from the WHO, who up until that point had maintained that masks were useless (they are) and served no purpose whatsoever in a viral outbreak (they don’t).

The public were never advised on the safe usage of masks, which is of the upmost importance when dealing with a viral emergency. No mask of any type should be worn for more than 15 to 20 minutes, at which point it becomes a potentially lethal biohazard due to pathogenic load (virus, bacteria, fungal spores etc) within the mask material, at that point it should be removed and disposed of in a suitable biohazard receptacle – which should have been placed in all appropriate places (many thousands). If at any point the surface of the mask is touched, including removal it is then a biohazard, which should not be placed back on the face and should be disposed of safely as a biohazard.

Covid is a remarkably clever Virus, unprecedentedly so, not only does it know the time (curfews), it can also count (rule of 6), and it knows when someone is sitting or standing – remarkable!

Also, and this is awesome, it is aware of Perspex screens, and instinctively knows not to pass beyond or behind a screen, as the screen provides guaranteed 100% protection from Covid, and Covid knows!

On top of that it can also measure distances, if people are clever enough to remember to stand 2 metres apart, they can actually outwit the virus (so not that clever!), even though as an aerosol the virus can travel 30m in free air. In some countries people can stand 1.5m or 6 feet apart and still be safe, so perhaps the virus also knows geography as well.

In 2014 renowned medical specialist Bill Gates during a TED talk announced (for no apparent reason) that the entire global population of around 7 billion people should be vaccinated (for what he didn’t say). He did admit that up to 700,000 people (insignificant nobody’s) would likely die as a result of those vaccines, but that was a price worth paying for the increase in his personal wealth greater good. To be fair to Bill, he was only about a factor of 100 out on the deaths from the vaccine statistic.

Interesting fact: If you google something like “worlds most famous or influential doctor” the top reply is Bill Gates (not Fauci), even though he has no medical qualifications or experience.

Serous questions need to be asked on the role of the likes of Dr Anthony Fauci and Dr Francis Collins, it is possible their advice and mandates have contributed to considerable harms and deaths, to millions of people. In the UK the head of the UKHSA Dr June Raine also needs to face some very serious questions, as do Chris Whitty, Patrick Vallance, Jonathan van Tam and of course Matt Hancock, Boris Johnson and others.

In the pursuit of fairness, every death since the so-called vaccine rollout began (December 2020), should include the persons (actual – from the time/date the injection was administered) vaccine status, this should also probably extend to any illness, especially those listed as possible known side effects. The vaccinated (any number) and the unvaccinated (no jabs) cohorts could then be compared to comparative baseline figures pre Covid vaccine.

 Variants, sub-variants and sub-sub-variants are like Unicorns and Father Christmas – they don’t exist! The genetic sequence of SARS-COV-2 is alleged to consist of something like 20,000 nucleotides, but gene sequencing only exists in silico  which basically means in a computer simulation. If we assume the original virus represents a template for the gene sequence, then any variant represents a minor alteration in one or more parts of that sequence. If the differences are significant then it is a new viral organism not a variant, like SARS-COV-2 differs from SARS-COV-1 by about 20%, they are not the same. It is highly likely that any minor alteration from the original is irrelevant and only of statistical importance. The key part (we are told) is the spike protein, so unless the so-called variant results in a change to the structure of the spike protein, then it is not a variant at all, but a media anomaly. But this does raise two very obvious questions:

1. If the PCR (and LFT) test has been tuned to detect the original virus, how is it able to also detect the so-called variant, and if it can, how does it differentiate between the two (or more)?
2. If a vaccine has been specifically customised to synthesise the original virus spike protein as claimed, how is that same vaccine able to synthesise the variant spike protein? Virus mutation is always going to outstrip vaccine development, unless somehow the “variant” structure is known in advance, but that would suggest a conspiracy.

We are told that lockdowns, distancing, masks, isolation, Perspex screens,  shielding and all the other Non-Medical Interventions (NMIs) were enacted because of the precautionary principle, which is all fine and great. Better to be seen to do something than do nothing and watch our species go extinct! What is not obvious is why the administration of experimental, untested, never before used on humans gene therapies was not also subjected to the precautionary principle. It is no stretch of credibility to suggest that politicians, news readers, musicians and celebrities endorsing these products as “safe and effective” is no guarantee of their safety or effectiveness.

In reality how can anyone know for certain the safety profile of a product that has never before been injected into human bloodstream when all the usual clinical trials, previously lasting 10 years or more have been short-circuited or ignored? How can anyone know they are safe in the short, medium and long term? It certainly appears that in the short term (0 to 2 years) they are anything but safe.

Some other salient and pertinent points regarding the so-called Covid pandemic

• Daily cases (positive PCR tests) were reported as absolute figures, they never quoted the actual number of tests performed per day, that would have had a significant bearing on those figures
• They only quoted daily hospitalisation, as in patients admitted to hospital, they never showed the number of Covid (or those with a positive PCR) patients released from hospital in the same time period
• The daily deaths announced were never put into perspective, as to how many daily deaths might be expected at that time of year. They should have reported total deaths (all causes, all settings) per day and if that was normal, above normal or below normal. The total deaths should have further been categorised by cause, by age and by setting such as in hospital, at home, in a care home etc. After the first vaccine was administered each death should have also identified actual vaccine status, such as unvaccinated, 4 days after 1st vaccine, 18 days after first booster or whatever. These types of figures are incredibly important to understand this particular disease and the responses to it, and how best to handle future diseases.
• Why were healthy lifestyles and immune boosting supplements not promoted? Sports facilities and Gyms were even forced to close in the first lockdown, denying people the opportunity to keep fit and exercise.
• Did every person receiving a “vaccination” sign a consent form, as required for every medical intervention? If not they are the victims of the Tort Law crime of battery, and those who administered the dose are guilty of battery – assault upon the person.
• Did every person receiving a “vaccination” receive information about the medical product being administered, its potential side effects, to allow those receiving the dose to make an informed decision before signing (or not) any consent form?
• Why was the policy of NOT mass vaccinating during the height of an alleged pandemic ignored? Considering it was known in advance that this runs the very real risk of creating breakout “variants”?
• Why was the long established understanding of protection afforded by prior infection ignored? Why were people who had already had “Covid” told to still get “vaccinated”
• Why were children and those under 20 “vaccinated” when it was already known that “Covid” posed little threat to that age group?
• Why were pregnant women, or those hoping to become pregnant told to get a “vaccine” when historically it is known these women are at a very elevated risk from any medical intervention? Remember Thalidomide!
• Why were the government unable to provide the false positive rate of PCR and/or LFT tests?
• Why did the vaccination programme continue beyond the point when the first person was reported as a death following vaccination? Is this not a case of criminal negligence? Where was/is the investigation?
• It was never illegal to be unvaccinated, it was and is illegal to coerce someone to take a medical intervention, why was this coercion, through multiple means allowed to occur?
• Why did the authorities fail to inform the public that the so-called “vaccines” did not stop a person catching “Covid” nor did it prevent transmission, and that the “vaccine” producers never claimed either was the case?
•  Why did the authorities fail to differentiate between Absolute and Relative Reduction Rates (ARR and RRR) of the various so-called “vaccines”?
• Never before have we seen vaccines for a Coronavirus like the Common Cold, because they are pointless, we don’t see them because they don’t work.
• Never before have large scale vaccine programs been used at the height of an (alleged) viral outbreak
• Where were all of the 10’s of thousands of biohazard bins for the safe disposal of used masks?
• Please explain scientifically, how it is safe to sit at a table in a restaurant without a mask, but why its not safe to walk to and from the table?
• If we assume the “Covid” virus is active at up to 2 metres, why do people need to poke a stick to the back of their nose and/or throat to obtain a suitable sample?
• Inexperienced people performing the injections in many cases were injecting the “vaccines” directly into blood vessels, why were they not taught the relatively simple procedure to make sure this was not happening? Why were inexperienced, untrained personnel performing these medical procedures?
• Why did the PM, Ministers, Civil servants and advisors consider it safe enough to attend drinks and parties, when those same people were informing the public we were in the midst of a deadly viral outbreak, and that mixing with other people was incredibly dangerous. The issue in NOT that they had parties when advice was not to mix socially, it is that they had the data and deemed it safe enough to actually mix socially, would you really put your life at severe risk just to have a drink with some mates or colleagues? Some people might!
• Why should anyone ever trust anything the government, health experts or mainstream media tells them? That trust has been totally and utterly shattered. But that happened way before the so-called Covid pandemic!
• Covid was unique in that one of it’s symptoms was actually no symptoms at all, and the spectacle of the asymptomatic spreader. So you have no symptoms, you produce a negative PCR and/or LFT test, but you are still able to spread the disease – yeah right, and I’ve got some time shares on Mars to sell.
• What are the potential health impacts of the following:
  • Microplastics in medical-style masks.
  • Chemicals present in medical-style masks.
  • Inserting a long thin stick to the very back of your nose and/or throat to the membrane surrounding the brain, the very delicate Meninges, the dura mater (outer), the arachnoid (middle) and the pia mater (inner) layers.
  • What chemicals are present on the PCR sticks, what is used to sterilise them?
  • Midazolam, a respiratory suppressant being administered in Care and Nursing Homes. Health Secretary Matt Hancock apparently bought up all of France’s reserve stocks. Why would you administer a respiratory suppressant to old and possibly frail people who may be suffering from a respiratory disease?

There is even some doubt as to whether the SARS-COV-2 virus exists, other than as a computer generated gene sequence. The burden of proof is on those who discovered the virus to prove its existence by producing isolated samples of the virus. Ideally fulfilling the requirements of Koch’s postulate (below) would provide that proof!

*****

Koch’s Postulate
 

In 1890 the criteria for seeing if a given bacteria was the cause of a certain disease was proposed by Robert Koch, German physician and bacteriologist. (German Koch Foundation)

The bacteria (virus) must be present in every case of the disease.

The bacteria (virus) must be isolated from the host with the disease and grown in pure culture.

The specific disease must be reproduced when a pure culture of the bacteria (virus) is inoculated into a healthy susceptible host.

The bacteria (virus) must be recoverable from the experimentally infected host.

These criteria, from before the time we could identify viruses, could also be used to prove causation of viruses in disease. The same rigour and burden of proof should be applied in the case of a virus (any virus)