Return to Covid-19

Questions to UK government

Questions that the UK government need to answer:

  1. Why was our response to Coronavirus based on a computer modelling by Imperial College only? were no others available? Were no others considered, or even sought?
  2. Considering the truly awful past history of predictions by Professor Neil Ferguson of imperial College, why were his Coronavirus recommendations even considered?
  3. Coronavirus was downgraded by the UK Government from a High Consequence Infectious Disease (HCID) on March 19th 2020, why was this not made public knowledge? Why did this not insignificant factor guide further government policy? https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid
  4. Why did the UK government only consult one group of “Experts”, why were dissenting opinions not sought from other eminent Epidemiologists and Virologists ? Not all Experts agreed
  5. When real data emerged that totally refuted the computer modelling predictions of Imperial College, why were lockdown restrictions not relaxed or removed?
  6. Why were peer reviewed assessments of the Imperial College computer modelling software not made available? Especially considering no-one reported similar or even consistent results. The scientific method requires the base source code should be made available for verification purposes, the results should have been made available in the public domain.
  7. Who chooses the make-up of individuals of SAGE? Why are so many of them known left-wing activists?
  8. Why did we not seal our borders to foreigners before locking down our nation? As an Island nation we could have controlled the spread, and only allow returning British nationals who would be screened and quarantined. Foreign nationals could have been allowed to return to their home countries as long as they were not symptomatic. To suggest this was in any way racist is beyond absurd, especially considering BAME communities are disproportionately affected.
  9. Can the government, or health professionals give an exact figure of individuals who have died of Coronavirus, as opposed to those designated as dying with Coronavirus? Why were death certificates changed to allow merely the suspicion of Covid-19 infection, since when was this considered good medical practice? Because of this we can never know the true number of deaths due to the pandemic, and this will impact our ability to plan accordingly for future health emergencies.
  10. Can the government provide empirical evidence that the policy of lockdown has saved even one single life?
  11. How many people to date have died due to the policy of lockdown, due to non treatment of chronic illness, suicide or other causes not attributable to Coronavirus?
  12. Can the government provide the empirical evidence of the number of people who would have died had we not adopted lockdown and social distancing policies?
  13. Can the government provide the empirical evidence of the number of people who would have died had we sealed our borders and not locked down healthy individuals? Not predictions or extrapolations, but hard data.
  14. Can the government provide the empirical evidence that lack of social distancing measures in outdoor settings would have resulted in even one single infection?
  15. Can Neil Ferguson and his team at Imperial College provide empirical data proving that even one life was saved by locking down healthy people, or that locking down any arbitrary time earlier would have saved even one life?
  16. Who made the decision to remove elderly infected individuals from hospital beds back to care homes? How many deaths in care home environments resulted following this insane and criminally negligent policy?
  17. What is the scientific basis for the 2 metre social distancing rule?
  18. Considering the UK was following WHO advice, why did we not adopt their recommendation of 1 metre?
  19. Why did we cherry pick WHO advice?
  20. Who made the catastrophic decision to stop treating and diagnosing cancer patients and others with chronic (non-Covid) conditions?
  21. Where are the safety studies relating to 5G rollout?
  22. Where are the risk assessments relating to 5G?
  23. Microwave ovens operating at 2.5 GHz are shielded for health reasons. 5G operates between 25 GHz and 39 GHz and by their nature cannot be shielded, what is the effect on the human body, including at the cellular and molecular level in close proximity to those frequencies?
  24. If 5G is deemed as totally safe to humans, why can this not be debated and questioned openly? Concerns relating to questions 21 to 23 are not unreasonable concerns!
  25. Are providers of 5G fully indemnified against potential future health claims?
  26. Why are infection and death rates continuously amended to include previously unrecorded data, totally invalidating the data? Manipulated data is useless.
  27. How many people have died alone and neglected in their own homes due to lockdown policies?